Expert Report of Edward C. Monahan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Expert Report of Edward C. Monahan EXPERT REPORT OF EDWARD C. MONAHAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. QUALIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................... 1 II. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 2 III. DATA AND INFORMATION CONSIDERED IN FORMING OPINIONS ................ 3 IV. FACTS, ASSUMPTIONS, AND METHODOLOGY .................................................... 4 A. 81 Sampled cases ................................................................................................ 4 B. 35 Case files ........................................................................................................ 8 V. OPINIONS AND BASES/REASONS FOR THEM ...................................................... 9 A. Legal obligations of governments to provide counsel Right to counsel when facing possibility of loss of liberty ............................................................ 9 B. There are 8,725 cases in Lexington County Magistrate Courts with charges for which incarceration is a possible sentence ............................. 15 C. 5,312 to 6,185 indigents did not receive the assistance of counsel in 2019 in Lexington County, South Carolina Magistrate Court ...................... 17 D. Requirements for adequately funding and staffing public defense in Lexington County’s Magistrate Courts ............................................................. 19 1. National Standards for Public Defender Workloads ............................. 21 2. Ethical Rules Require Reasonable Workloads ..................................... 22 3. ABA Workload Standard - National Maximum Standard for Over Four Decades: 400 .................................................................. 23 4. NAC Caseloads Translated to Hours .................................................... 23 5. Maximum number of cases for a properly staffed attorney .................. 23 6. 13 - 16 attorneys are needed to adequately serve indigent clients in Magistrate Court. ................................................................... 25 7. The ABA Ten Principles Workload Standard Is the Maximum Number that Can Be Handled ............................................................... 25 2 8. Support staff .......................................................................................... 26 9. 4 - 5 investigators are needed for the indigent defense cases in Magistrate Court ................................................................................... 26 10. 4 - 5 social workers are needed for the indigent defense cases in Magistrate Court ............................................................................... 27 E. Practical considerations/reasons weigh in favor of provision of counsel and for adequate staffing ................................................................................... 28 F. Staffing and funding of public defense in Lexington County’s Magistrate Courts is and has historically been inadequate ................................................. 31 1. Lexington County has historically underfunded the Public Defender Office .................................................................................... 32 G. Lexington County Magistrate Courts have structural, pervasive and serious constitutional deficiencies .................................................................... 33 H. An efficient, yet deeply problematic pattern and practice ................................ 36 I. Waiver of the right to counsel colloquies are deficient and trials in absentia are unusually high ............................................................................... 38 1. Every reasonable presumption against waiver of counsel must be made. ................................................................................................ 38 J. The boilerplate waiver of counsel form is written at a college grade level and is not readily comprehensible to ordinary defendants ....................... 39 K. Rote, mechanical, automatic waivers................................................................ 43 L. Trials in Absentia .............................................................................................. 46 M. Lack of counsel has deleterious effects for clients who face fines beyond their financial means, and lifelong collateral consequences that result from lack of counsel .................................................................................................. 48 1. Magistrate Judges must conduct meaningful ability to pay hearings ... 49 2. Collateral consequences of a conviction ............................................... 50 3. At show cause hearings, convicted persons are unrepresented ............. 52 3 4. Social and government costs ................................................................. 52 5. Attorney at first appearance and value of an attorney: lawyers make a difference .............................................................................................. 53 N. Lexington County’s practices lag behind other comparable South Carolina and national public defense county and city programs ..................................... 56 1. City of Beaufort and Town of Bluffton, South Carolina ...................... 56 2. York County, South Carolina ............................................................... 57 3. Denver, Colorado .................................................................................. 57 4. Aurora, Colorado .................................................................................. 58 5. Atlanta, Georgia .................................................................................... 59 6. National standards of practice ............................................................... 60 a. Appointment and waiver ........................................................... 60 b. Fines and fees ............................................................................ 60 c. ABA Ethics Opinion ................................................................. 62 d. Workloads and support staff ..................................................... 63 VI. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS; RECOMMENDATIONS ....... 63 VII. FINDINGS .................................................................................................................... 64 A. Remedies, at a minimum, include ..................................................................... 65 B. Consequences of deficiencies ........................................................................... 66 VIII. ANTICIPATED FUTURE WORK .............................................................................. 66 IX. EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................... 67 4 I, Edward C. Monahan declare: I. QUALIFICATIONS I have been asked by counsel for Plaintiffs to render an opinion on the provision of counsel in Magistrate Courts in Lexington County, South Carolina. I served as a public defender with the Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy, the agency charged with the delivery of public defender services throughout Kentucky, for 38 years from 1976 to 2004 and from 2008 to 2017. I was the Public Advocate, which is the chief administrator of the Department of Public Advocacy, for Kentucky from September 1, 2008 until September 15, 2017. As the Public Advocate, I oversaw 545 full-time staff statewide. In the 2017 fiscal year, the Kentucky program provided representation in 162,485 cases at every level of the Kentucky criminal justice system. Major initiatives during my term as Public Advocate included reforms to pretrial release and expansion of alternative sentencing programs focused on alternatives to incarceration. Before that, I was Deputy Public Advocate from 1996 to 2008. I also served as Training Director from 1980 to 2001 with responsibility for developing and producing practice education and development programs and publications for Kentucky public defenders, investigators, paralegals, mitigation specialists, and legal secretaries for trial, appeal, and post-conviction levels. Over the course of my career, I have personally represented criminal clients at trial, appeal, and post-conviction, including capital clients. Since September 2017, I have worked as a criminal defense consultant, doing program evaluations, consulting with public defense programs, and training defenders and criminal defense lawyers. I serve on the National Association of Public Defenders (NAPD) Systems Builders, Workload, Fines and Fees, and Steering Committees. I am currently a member of the Kentucky Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Board and co-chair of the Education Committee. I am chair-elect of the ABA Government and Public Sector Lawyers Division Council. I am a graduate of the Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C.; Law Review, staff member 1974-1975, Associate Editor, 1975-1976; Degree: J.D., May 1976. I previously provided an expert opinion in the 2018 litigation in Nevada, Davis v. Nevada, Case No. 170C02271B by affidavit in consideration of whether the case should be certified as a class action. In that litigation, I was asked to render an opinion on whether the public defense contracts were structured to provide meaningful representation of clients in the rural Nevada counties. I reviewed the contracts for requirements to comply with national and state norms including workload limits, adequate staffing, training, compensation,
Recommended publications
  • Democratic Citizenship in the Heart of Empire Dissertation Presented In
    POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AMERICAN EDUCATION: Democratic Citizenship in the Heart of Empire Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University Thomas Michael Falk B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University Summer, 2012 Committee Members: Bryan Warnick (Chair), Phil Smith, Ann Allen Copyright by Thomas Michael Falk 2012 ABSTRACT Chief among the goals of American education is the cultivation of democratic citizens. Contrary to State catechism delivered through our schools, America was not born a democracy; rather it emerged as a republic with a distinct bias against democracy. Nonetheless we inherit a great demotic heritage. Abolition, the labor struggle, women’s suffrage, and Civil Rights, for example, struck mighty blows against the established political and economic power of the State. State political economies, whether capitalist, socialist, or communist, each express characteristics of a slave society. All feature oppression, exploitation, starvation, and destitution as constitutive elements. In order to survive in our capitalist society, the average person must sell the contents of her life in exchange for a wage. Fundamentally, I challenge the equation of State schooling with public and/or democratic education. Our schools have not historically belonged to a democratic public. Rather, they have been created, funded, and managed by an elite class wielding local, state, and federal government as its executive arms. Schools are economic institutions, serving a division of labor in the reproduction of the larger economy. Rather than the school, our workplaces are the chief educational institutions of our lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert F.Kennedy
    P SPEAK OUT U K A E P S GRADE 8 RobeRt F. Kennedy LESSON PLANS ROBERT F. KENNEDY MEMORIAL PHOTO CREDIT: STANLEY TRETICK RobeRt F. K ennedy ChampIon oF SoCIaL JUStICe Grade 8 “Laws can embody standards; govern - ments can enforce laws; but the final task is not a task for government. It is a task for each and every one of us. every time we turn our heads the other way when we see the law flouted; when we tolerate what we know to be wrong; when we close our eyes and ears to the s e g a corrupt because we are too busy, or too m I y t t e G frightened; when we fail to speak up / s e r u t c and speak out – we strike a blow against i P e f i L freedom and decency and justice.” e m i T / / e g d i r Robert F. Kennedy (1925-1968) on June 21, 1961, in remarks p p E l l before the Joint Defense Appeal of the American Jewish i B y b Committee and the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai o t o h B’rith, Chicago. P “S peaK Up, S peaK oUt : R obeRt F. K ennedy , C hampIon oF SoCIaL JUStICe ,” IS the pRodUCt oF a paRtneRShIp between the RobeRt F. K ennedy memoRIaL , dedICated to advanCIng hUman RIghtS by pRovIdIng InnovatIve SUppoRt to CoURageoUS hUman RIghtS deFendeRS aRoUnd the woRLd ; and new yoRK State UnIted teaCheRS , a StatewIde UnIon oF moRe than 600,000 pRoFeSSIonaLS dedICated to StRengthenIng edUCatIon and heaLth CaRe and advanCIng SoCIaL JUStICe .
    [Show full text]
  • Edwin Meese Papers, 1941-1991
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt358035d1 Online items available Inventory of the Edwin Meese papers, 1941-1991 Finding aid prepared by Aparna Mukherjee, revised by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Staff and Beth Goder Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 1991, 2013 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Inventory of the Edwin Meese 91005 1 papers, 1941-1991 Title: Edwin Meese papers Date (inclusive): 1941-1991 Collection Number: 91005 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 772 manuscript boxes, 2 oversize boxes, 1 envelope, 5 sound cassettes, 2 motion picture film reels(325.0 Linear Feet) Abstract: Speeches, correspondence, memoranda, reports, schedules, press releases, legal documents, printed matter, photographs, and sound recordings related to California politics and administration of the California state government during the governorship of Ronald Reagan; and to American domestic policy, Republican Party politics, and federal administration of justice during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org. Creator: Meese, Edwin Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 1991, with increments received in subsequent years. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Edwin Meese papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Edward H. Levi Papers 1894-1998
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the Edward H. Levi Papers 1894-1998 © 2004 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Descriptive Summary 3 Information on Use 3 Access 3 Citation 3 Biographical Note 3 Scope Note 5 Related Resources 7 Subject Headings 7 INVENTORY 8 Series I: Biographical and Personal 8 Series II: Correspondence, 1936-1998 12 Subseries 1: Business Correspondence, 1947-1997 14 Subseries 2: General Correspondence, 1936-1998 16 Series III: General and Subject Files, 1937-1994 90 Subseries 1: General Files, 1942-1994 91 Subseries 2: Subject file, 1937-1954 94 Subseries 3: Subject File, 1951, 1964-1991 103 Series IV: University of Chicago, 1939-1994 116 Subseries 1: General files, 1939-1996 117 Subseries 2: Law School, 1939-1994 121 Subseries 3: Provost, 1962-1968 125 Subseries 4: President, 1967-1975 126 Subseries 5: Course Materials, 1937-1984 127 Series V: Department of Justice, 1940-1996 133 Subseries 1: Department of Justice, 1940-1945 135 Subseries 2: Attorney General, 1975-1977 145 Subseries 3: Post Attorney General, 1975-1996 164 Series VI: Organizations, 1936-1996 170 Subseries 1: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1963-1995 172 Subseries 2: American Bar Association, 1951-1995 188 Subseries 3: American Law Institute, 1955-1996 194 Subseries 4: Other Organizations, 1936-1996 204 Series VII: Speeches and Writings, 1936-1992, n.d. 249 Subseries 1: Texts, 1936-1992, n.d. 250 Subseries 2: Associated documents, 1958-1992 272 Series VIII: Clippings and Audio/Visual Items 273 Series IX: Restricted files, 1946-1996 279 Subseries 1: Correspondence, 1963-1995 279 Subseries 2: Supreme Court cases, 1946-1993 280 Subseries 3: University of Chicago, 1951-1996 281 Subseries 4: Organizations, 1978-1996 285 Subseries 5: MacArthur Foundation, 1978-1996 289 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.EHLEVI Title Levi, Edward H., Papers Date 1894-1998 Size 258 linear feet (441 boxes) Repository Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library 1100 East 57th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School REMEMBERING JIMMY CARTER THE RHETORICAL EVOCATIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL MEMORIES A Thesis in Communication Arts and Sciences by Brandon M. Johnson 2020 Brandon M. Johnson Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2020 The thesis of Brandon M. Johnson was reviewed and approved by the following: Mary E. Stuckey Professor, Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Stephen H. Browne Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Michael J. Steudeman Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Director of CAS100A Denise H. Solomon Head and Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT This thesis is an analysis of the public memory of Jimmy Carter and the way the historical resources of his presidency (including his perceived moral character) are interpreted and evoked as a shorthand for presidential failure by associating him with a rhetoric of weakness. Broadly, I consider the nature of presidential memory, asking how a presidency passes from history to memory. I suggest that presidential histories serve as inventional resources in the present, with rhetors evoking interpretations of the past as rhetorical appeals. These appeals are acts of memory, and analyzing how they function discursively and are deployed strategically draws out how presidential memory works and what implications it has to presidential rhetoric. The different strategies used in remembering the presidency of Jimmy Carter are useful texts for rhetorically critiquing this process because Carter is often deployed as a rhetorical shorthand, providing a representative example of interpreting presidential pasts. I begin by considering the evolving scholarship and historiography on Carter and conceptualizing how presidential pasts can be interpreted in the present through acts of remembering.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwin Meese Papers, 1951-1991
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt358035d1 No online items Inventory of the Edwin Meese papers, 1951-1991 Finding aid prepared by Aparna Mukherjee, 1991. Revised by Alexandra Dunlop, Beth Goder, Casey Limgenco, and Steven Wandro, 2013. Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 2013 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Inventory of the Edwin Meese 91005 1 papers, 1951-1991 Collection Summary Title: Edwin Meese papers Date (inclusive): 1951-1991 Creator: Meese, Edwin. Collection Number: 91005 Repository: Hoover Institution Archives Stanford, California 94305-6010 Collection Size: 771 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 1 card file box, 1 envelope, 4 phonotape cassettes, 2 motion picture film reels (325 linear feet) Abstract: Speeches, correspondence, memoranda, reports, schedules, press releases, legal documents, printed matter, photographs, and sound recordings related to California politics and administration of the California state government during the governorship of Ronald Reagan; and to American domestic policy, Republican Party politics, and federal administration of justice during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Language of the Materials: The collection is in English. Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all audiovisual material is immediately accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Marc D. Falkoff
    MARC D. FALKOFF TEACHING AND ADMINISTRATION Northern Illinois University College of Law, DeKalb, IL 2006–present Associate Dean for Academic Affairs (acting 2015–2016; 2016–present) Professor of Law (2016–present; with tenure since 2012) Associate Professor of Law (2010–2016) Assistant Professor of Law (2006–2010) Courses in Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure (Police Investigations), Criminal Procedure (Adjudication), Constitutional Law, Corporations, Federal Courts, Post-Conviction Remedies, Introduction to Lawyering Skills Director of Faculty Development (2013–2015) Brooklyn Law School, Brooklyn, NY 2004, 2006 Adjunct Professor of Law Courses in Post-Conviction Remedies and Prisoners’ Rights State University of New York, Purchase College, Purchase, NY 1997–1998 Adjunct Professor of Literature Courses in Realism and Naturalism, Memoir Writing, Contemporary American Fiction EDUCATION Columbia Law School, J.D. 1998–2001 Columbia Law Review, Articles Editor James Kent Scholar, 1999–2000 Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, 1998–1999, 2000–2001 Student Legal Action Network, President Public Interest Law Students Association, President Brandeis University, Ph.D. (English) 1991–1997 Dissertation, Heads and Tales: American Letters in the Age of Phrenology Instructor, Writing & Composition Teaching Assistant for courses in 19th-Century American Literature, Introductory Linguistics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, M.A. (English) 1989–1990 Teaching Assistant for courses in Bible as Literature, Political Novel University of Pennsylvania, B.A. (English and Psychology) 1984–1988 Cum laude and with distinction in English Pennsylvania Punch Bowl Magazine, Editor in Chief Research Assistant for Professor Betsy Erkkila CLERKSHIPS United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY 2002–2003 Law Clerk to the Honorable Jack B.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene R. Nichol
    GENE R. NICHOL Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 [email protected] 919 962 5928; [cell] 757 903 8589 Family Married to B. Glenn George three daughters — Jesse, Jennifer, Soren Prior Academic Positions Director, UNC Poverty Center 2008-2015 President, College of William & Mary, 2005-2008 Dean and Burton Craige Professor [1999-2005], University of North Carolina Law School Dean and Professor of Law, University of Colorado Law School, 1988-1995; Professor of Law, 1996-1999. J.G. Cutler Professor and Director, Institute of Bill of Rights Law, College of William & Mary, 1985-1988 Professor of Law, University of Florida, 1984-1985 Assistant/Associate Professor of Law, West Virginia University, 1978-1984 Education B.A., Philosophy, Oklahoma State University 1973; University of Florida, 1969-1970; Varsity Football, 1969-1973 J.D., University of Texas, 1976, Order of the Coif. PUBLICATIONS Books THE FACES OF POVERTY IN NORTH CAROLINA (UNC Press, 2018) CASES AND MATERIALS ON FEDERAL COURTS (W. Marshall, G. Nichol & M. Wells) (3rd ed. 2015). [KF8718 .W45 2015 c.2] SEEING THE INVISIBLE: PUTTING A FACE ON POVERTY IN NORTH Gene R. Nichol Page 2 CAROLINA (News & Observer) (Amazon Kindle, April 4, 2014). CASES AND MATERIALS ON FEDERAL COURTS, (with M. Wells, G. Nichol and L. Yackle) (West American Casebook Series 2nd ed. 2012) (Teacher's manual). CASES AND MATERIALS ON FEDERAL COURTS (with M. Wells, G. Nichol and L. Yackle) (West 2nd ed.; American Casebook Series 2011). [KF8718 .W45 2011] FEDERAL COURTS: CASES, COMMENTS, AND QUESTIONS (with M.H. Redish) (Supp.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwin O. Guthman Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 2/21/1968 Administrative Information
    Edwin O. Guthman Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 2/21/1968 Administrative Information Creator: Edwin O. Guthman Interviewer: John F. Stewart Date of Interview: February 21, 1968 Place of Interview: Los Angeles, CA Length: 76 pages Biographical Note Guthman, Editor, Seattle Times (1947-1961); Director of Public Information, Department of Justice (1961-1964); press assistant to Robert F. Kennedy [RFK] (1964-1965) discusses the press coverage during the Kennedy Administration, RFK’s relationship with the press, and Guthman’s involvement in the investigation of Jimmy Hoffa, among other issues. Access Restrictions No restrictions. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed August 22, 1991, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Thurgood Marshall's Speeches on Equality and Justice Under the Law, 1965-1967
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1979 Thurgood Marshall's Speeches on Equality and Justice Under the Law, 1965-1967. Erma Waddy Hines Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Hines, Erma Waddy, "Thurgood Marshall's Speeches on Equality and Justice Under the Law, 1965-1967." (1979). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3335. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3335 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacldng from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rob Reinhardt 42Nd State Bar President
    AugustAugggustust 22000004 mmbermber 1 RobRob ReinhardtReinhardt 42nd42nd StateState BarBar PresidentPresident Unlock Your Potential Sign Up for the Women & Minorities in the Profession Committee’s Speaker Clearinghouse About the Clearinghouse The Women and Minorities in the Profession Committee is committed to promoting equal par- ticipation of minorities and women in the legal profession. The Speaker Clearinghouse is designed specifically for, and contains detailed information about, minority and women lawyers who would like to be considered as faculty members in continuing legal education programs and provided with other speaking opportunities. For more information and to sign up, visit www.gabar.org/speakerbarcheck.asp.To search the Speaker Clearinghouse, which provides contact information and information on the legal experience of minority and women lawyers participating in the program, visit www.gabar.org/speakersearch.asp. State Bar of Georgia We’re here for you! Law Practice Management Program The Law Practice Management Program is a member service to help all Georgia lawyers and their employ- ees put together the pieces of the office management puzzle. Whether you need advice on new computers or copiers, personnel issues, compensation, work- flow, file organization, tickler systems, library materi- als or software, we have the resources and training to assist you. Feel free to browse our online forms and article collections, check out a book or videotape from our library, or learn more about our on-site manage- ment consultations and training sessions. Consumer Assistance Program The Consumer Assistance Program has a dual pur- pose: assistance to the public and attorneys. CAP responds to inquiries from the public regarding State Bar members and assists the public through informal methods to resolve inquiries which may involve minor violations of disciplinary standards is by attorneys.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kennedy Administration's Campaign to Restore Public
    LEE, BRIAN E., Ph.D. A Matter of National Concern: The Kennedy Administration’s Campaign to Restore Public Education to Prince Edward County, Virginia (2015) Directed by Charles C. Bolton. 462 pp. The Kennedy administration’s civil rights record requires revision. Scholars have developed a negative interpretation of that record by focusing on the most dramatic crises and a handful of poor judicial appointees. The dominant narrative, therefore, concludes that the administration reacted to civil rights crises, hesitated on advancing racial equality to protect the president’s domestic agenda from attack by southern legislators, and appointed racist federal judges. Those crises and judges do not fully represent the administration’s performance on civil rights. All matters for racial equality from that period and all of President Kennedy’s judicial appointees need to be examined to develop a comprehensive assessment of the administration’s record. “A Matter of National Concern” analyzes the Kennedy administration’s civil rights record through a case study of Prince Edward County, Virginia. This study synthesizes unpublished and, in some cases, previously unexamined manuscript collections, government documents, newspapers, periodicals, secondary sources, and oral histories. The historical record of the Kennedy administration’s performance in Prince Edward County counters the dominant narrative of President Kennedy’s civil rights record. In fact, the administration took proactive measures to arrest that county’s school crisis, risked its legislative program against southern legislators by standing up for black Prince Edwardians, and appointed moderate-to-progressive judges to the U.S. Fourth Circuit who broke down the county’s resistance to school desegregation.
    [Show full text]