DOCSLIB.ORG

Edwin Meese Papers, 1941-1991

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt358035d1 Online items available Inventory of the Edwin Meese papers, 1941-1991 Finding aid prepared by Aparna Mukherjee, revised by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Staff and Beth Goder Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 1991, 2013 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Inventory of the Edwin Meese 91005 1 papers, 1941-1991 Title: Edwin Meese papers Date (inclusive): 1941-1991 Collection Number: 91005 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 772 manuscript boxes, 2 oversize boxes, 1 envelope, 5 sound cassettes, 2 motion picture film reels(325.0 Linear Feet) Abstract: Speeches, correspondence, memoranda, reports, schedules, press releases, legal documents, printed matter, photographs, and sound recordings related to California politics and administration of the California state government during the governorship of Ronald Reagan; and to American domestic policy, Republican Party politics, and federal administration of justice during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org. Creator: Meese, Edwin Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 1991, with increments received in subsequent years. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Edwin Meese papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Alternate Forms Available Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org. 1931 Born, Oakland, California December 2 1954-1955 Served in the United States Army 1953 A.B. in public administration, Yale University 1958 Married Ursula Herrick J.D., University of California, Berkeley 1959-1967 Deputy district attorney, Alameda County, California 1967-1968 Legal affairs secretary (previously called secretary on clemency and extradition) to Governor Reagan 1969-1974 Executive assistant, chief of staff to Governor Reagan, Sacramento, California 1975-1976 Vice president, administration, Rohr Industries, Chula Vista, California 1976-1980 Attorney at law 1977-1978 Director, Center for Criminal Justice Policy and Management, University of California, San Diego 1977-1981 Professor of law, University of California, San Diego 1980 Chief of staff and senior issues advisor, Ronald Reagan Presidential Campaign 1981-1985 Member of the National Security Council Member of President Reagan's Cabinet Counselor to President Reagan, Washington, D.C. 1983 Recipient, Distinguished Public Service Award 1985 February-1988U.S. attorney general, Washington, D.C. August 1988- Ronald Reagan Chair in Public Policy, The Heritage Foundation Distinguished visiting fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, California 1992 Author, With Reagan: The Inside Story 1996 President, Council for National Policy 1996-2004 Member, Board of Visitors, George Mason University 1997 Author, Making America Safer 2001-2013 Chairman, Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, Heritage Foundation Inventory of the Edwin Meese 91005 2 papers, 1941-1991 2004 Author, Leadership, Ethics and Policing 2006 Member, Iraq Study Group 2008 Named honorary Reagan fellow of Eureka College, Illinois 2012 Recipient, Bradley Prize Scope and Content of Collection The Edwin Meese papers document Meese's role in the gubernatorial and presidential administrations of Ronald Reagan. The collection contains speeches, correspondence, memoranda, reports, schedules, press releases, legal documents, printed matter, photographs, and sound recordings related to California politics and administration of the California state government during the governorship of Ronald Reagan; and to American domestic policy, Republican Party politics, and federal administration of justice during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Meese began his work for Ronald Reagan during Reagan's two terms as governor of California. In his book With Reagan, Meese notes that he was recommended to the governor based on his experience with law enforcement. From 1967 to 1968, Meese served as legal affairs secretary, tasked with resolving issues of extraditions, prisons, and capital punishment, as well as acting as a liaison to legal, judicial, and law enforcement departments. From 1969 to 1974, Meese was executive assistant and chief of staff, directing the governor's executive office and serving on the cabinet. In this role, Meese also had responsibilities concerning the National Guard, the Office of Emergency Services, and the Office of Criminal Justice Planning. The Gubernatorial Administration of Ronald Reagan File documents Meese's work during this period through correspondence, clippings, memoranda, reports, schedules, speeches, and court documents. During Reagan's campaign for the presidency in 1980, Meese served as chief of staff and senior issues advisor. In order to devote more time to the campaign, Meese spent less time teaching as a professor of law at UC San Diego and gave up his duties managing the Center for Criminal Justice Policy and Management. After Reagan was elected, Meese served as a counselor to the president and as a member of his cabinet. Boxes 566 to 582 document the Iran-Contra Affair, a scandal involving the sale of arms to Iran in exchange for Iran's help in releasing American hostages. In November 1986, after news of the scandal became public, Meese announced that some of the money gained from selling arms to Iran had been used to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. The collection includes clippings, correspondence, memoranda, testimony of Meese and others, phone logs, and chronologies related to the Iran-Contra Affair. From February 1985 to August 1988, Edwin Meese held the position of attorney general of the United States. In this role, Meese influenced policy initiatives concerning drug abuse, civil rights, and criminal procedure, in addition to creating a national marijuana eradication program. His accomplishments included prevention and control of crime, improvement of the criminal justice system, protection of civil rights, promotion of economic growth, improvement of the legal system, government financial integrity, and the preservation of constitutional values. The Presidential Administration of Ronald Reagan File documents Meese's work during Ronald Reagan's presidency from 1981 to 1988, including his efforts as the 75th attorney general of the United States. As required by law, security-classified materials have been removed from the collection until they can be declassified by government officials. Gubernatorial Administration of Ronald Reagan File, 1941-1976. Contains correspondence, clippings, memoranda, reports, schedules, and court documents related to Meese's role during Ronald Reagan's terms as governor of California. Boxes 128-554, 772-773, film shelf. Agriculture and Services Agency Boxes 349-353, 364-367 Appointments to government positions Boxes 481-487 Budget Boxes 312-335 Business and Transportation Agency Boxes 370-378 California Council on Criminal Justice (CCCJ) Boxes 160-170 Clippings Boxes 456-480 Community and minority relations Inventory of the Edwin Meese 91005 3 papers, 1941-1991 Boxes 191-193 Conference file Boxes 288-300 Correspondence and memoranda Boxes 144-149, 154-155, 501-505, 529 Department of Corrections Boxes 390-395 Education Boxes 193-201, 487-494 Emergencies and disaster planning Boxes 176-190 Energy Boxes 440-446 Environment Boxes 424-439 Health and Welfare Agency Boxes 378-387, 552 Intelligence Boxes 494-497 Intergovernmental management Boxes 206-217, 247-251, 300-311 Legal affairs, legislation, and crime Boxes 217-240, 264-271 Military Boxes 240-247, 259 Office of Economic Opportunity Boxes 395-408 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act Boxes 170-174 Photographs Box 771 Schedules of Reagan and Meese Boxes 255-261, 509-511 Sound recordings Box 773 Speeches and speaking engagements of Meese Boxes 511-515 Speeches of Ronald Reagan Boxes 280-286 State employees Boxes 357-364 Student radicalism, activism, and unrest Boxes 230-236, 488-490 Tax reform Boxes 338-348 Water Boxes 447-449 Welfare Inventory of the Edwin Meese 91005 4 papers, 1941-1991 Boxes 409-418 Presidential Administration of Ronald Reagan File, 1975-1991. Contains correspondence, clippings, memoranda, reports, schedules, and court documents related to Meese's role during Ronald Reagan's presidency, including Meese's service as attorney general from 1985 to 1988. Boxes 554-771, 774. Alphabetical file Boxes 563-566, 608-627, 644-658, 693-701, 736-769 Chronological file Boxes 627-629 Clippings on Iran Boxes 710-716 Correspondence Boxes 602, 690-692, 708 Drug prevention Boxes 585-596 Iran-Contra Affair Boxes 566-581 Republican National Committee Boxes 686-689 Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation Boxes 729-736 Schedules of Reagan and Meese Boxes 554-556, 559-561, 582-584, 599-600, 603-608 Speeches and travel file Boxes 706-708, 653-658 Related Materials Ronald Reagan subject collection, Hoover Institution Library & Archives Citizens for Reagan records, Hoover Institution Library & Archives Governor and the Students videotape
Recommended publications
  • Justices' Profiles Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School

    Justices' Profiles Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School

    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Supreme Court Preview Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1995 Section 1: Justices' Profiles Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School, "Section 1: Justices' Profiles" (1995). Supreme Court Preview. 35. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview/35 Copyright c 1995 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview WARREN E. BURGER IS DEAD AT 87 Was Chief Justice for 17 Years Copyright 1995 The New York Times Company The New York Times June 26, 1995, Monday Linda Greenhouse Washington, June 25 - Warren E. Burger, who retired to apply like an epithet -- overruled no major in 1986 after 17 years as the 15th Chief Justice of the decisions from the Warren era. United States, died here today at age 87. The cause It was a further incongruity that despite Chief was congestive heart failure, a spokeswoman for the Justice Burger's high visibility and the evident relish Supreme Court said. with which he used his office to expound his views on An energetic court administrator, Chief Justice everything from legal education to prison Burger was in some respects a transitional figure management, scholars and Supreme Court despite his tenure, the longest for a Chief Justice in commentators continued to question the degree to this century. He presided over a Court that, while it which he actually led the institution over which he so grew steadily more conservative with subsequent energetically presided.
  • OFFICIAL HOTELS Reserve Your Hotel for AUA2020 Annual Meeting May 15 - 18, 2020 | Walter E

    OFFICIAL HOTELS Reserve Your Hotel for AUA2020 Annual Meeting May 15 - 18, 2020 | Walter E

    AUA2020 Annual Meeting OFFICIAL HOTELS Reserve Your Hotel for AUA2020 Annual Meeting May 15 - 18, 2020 | Walter E. Washington Convention Center | Washington, DC HOTEL NAME RATES HOTEL NAME RATES Marriott Marquis Washington, D.C. 3 Night Min. $355 Kimpton George Hotel* $359 Renaissance Washington DC Dwntwn Hotel 3 Night Min. $343 Kimpton Hotel Monaco Washington DC* $379 Beacon Hotel and Corporate Quarters* $289 Kimpton Hotel Palomar Washington DC* $349 Cambria Suites Washington, D.C. Convention Center $319 Liaison Capitol Hill* $259 Canopy by Hilton Washington DC Embassy Row $369 Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC* $349 Canopy by Hilton Washington D.C. The Wharf* $279 Mason & Rook Hotel * $349 Capital Hilton* $343 Morrison - Clark Historic Hotel $349 Comfort Inn Convention - Resident Designated Hotel* $221 Moxy Washington, DC Downtown $309 Conrad Washington DC 3 Night Min $389 Park Hyatt Washington* $317 Courtyard Washington Downtown Convention Center $335 Phoenix Park Hotel* $324 Donovan Hotel* $349 Pod DC* $259 Eaton Hotel Washington DC* $359 Residence Inn Washington Capitol Hill/Navy Yard* $279 Embassy Suites by Hilton Washington DC Convention $348 Residence Inn Washington Downtown/Convention $345 Fairfield Inn & Suites Washington, DC/Downtown* $319 Residence Inn Downtown Resident Designated* $289 Fairmont Washington, DC* $319 Sofitel Lafayette Square Washington DC* $369 Grand Hyatt Washington 3 Night Min $355 The Darcy Washington DC* $296 Hamilton Hotel $319 The Embassy Row Hotel* $269 Hampton Inn Washington DC Convention 3 Night Min $319 The Fairfax at Embassy Row* $279 Henley Park Hotel 3 Night Min $349 The Madison, a Hilton Hotel* $339 Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC Downtown* $299 The Mayflower Hotel, Autograph Collection* $343 Hilton Garden Inn Washington/Georgetown* $299 The Melrose Hotel, Washington D.C.* $299 Hilton Washington DC National Mall* $315 The Ritz-Carlton Washington DC* $359 Holiday Inn Washington, DC - Capitol* $289 The St.
  • The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration

    The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration

    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THE IMPACT OF THE NEW RIGHT ON THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION: KIRKPATRICK & UNESCO AS. A TEST CASE BY Isaac Izy Kfir LONDON 1998 UMI Number: U148638 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U148638 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to investigate whether the Reagan administration was influenced by ‘New Right’ ideas. Foreign policy issues were chosen as test cases because the presidency has more power in this area which is why it could promote an aggressive stance toward the United Nations and encourage withdrawal from UNESCO with little impunity. Chapter 1 deals with American society after 1945. It shows how the ground was set for the rise of Reagan and the New Right as America moved from a strong affinity with New Deal liberalism to a new form of conservatism, which the New Right and Reagan epitomised. Chapter 2 analyses the New Right as a coalition of three distinctive groups: anti-liberals, New Christian Right, and neoconservatives.
  • Conflicts of Interest in Bush V. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? Richard K

    Conflicts of Interest in Bush V. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? Richard K

    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship Spring 2003 Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? Richard K. Neumann Jr. Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Richard K. Neumann Jr., Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally?, 16 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 375 (2003) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES Conflicts of Interest in Bush v. Gore: Did Some Justices Vote Illegally? RICHARD K. NEUMANN, JR.* On December 9, 2000, the United States Supreme Court stayed the presidential election litigation in the Florida courts and set oral argument for December 11.1 On the morning of December 12-one day after oral argument and half a day before the Supreme Court announced its decision in Bush v. Gore2-the Wall Street Journalpublished a front-page story that included the following: Chief Justice William Rehnquist, 76 years old, and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, 70, both lifelong Republicans, have at times privately talked about retiring and would prefer that a Republican appoint their successors.... Justice O'Connor, a cancer survivor, has privately let it be known that, after 20 years on the high court,'she wants to retire to her home state of Arizona ...
  • Democratic Citizenship in the Heart of Empire Dissertation Presented In

    Democratic Citizenship in the Heart of Empire Dissertation Presented In

    POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AMERICAN EDUCATION: Democratic Citizenship in the Heart of Empire Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University Thomas Michael Falk B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University Summer, 2012 Committee Members: Bryan Warnick (Chair), Phil Smith, Ann Allen Copyright by Thomas Michael Falk 2012 ABSTRACT Chief among the goals of American education is the cultivation of democratic citizens. Contrary to State catechism delivered through our schools, America was not born a democracy; rather it emerged as a republic with a distinct bias against democracy. Nonetheless we inherit a great demotic heritage. Abolition, the labor struggle, women’s suffrage, and Civil Rights, for example, struck mighty blows against the established political and economic power of the State. State political economies, whether capitalist, socialist, or communist, each express characteristics of a slave society. All feature oppression, exploitation, starvation, and destitution as constitutive elements. In order to survive in our capitalist society, the average person must sell the contents of her life in exchange for a wage. Fundamentally, I challenge the equation of State schooling with public and/or democratic education. Our schools have not historically belonged to a democratic public. Rather, they have been created, funded, and managed by an elite class wielding local, state, and federal government as its executive arms. Schools are economic institutions, serving a division of labor in the reproduction of the larger economy. Rather than the school, our workplaces are the chief educational institutions of our lives.
  • Robert F.Kennedy

    Robert F.Kennedy

    P SPEAK OUT U K A E P S GRADE 8 RobeRt F. Kennedy LESSON PLANS ROBERT F. KENNEDY MEMORIAL PHOTO CREDIT: STANLEY TRETICK RobeRt F. K ennedy ChampIon oF SoCIaL JUStICe Grade 8 “Laws can embody standards; govern - ments can enforce laws; but the final task is not a task for government. It is a task for each and every one of us. every time we turn our heads the other way when we see the law flouted; when we tolerate what we know to be wrong; when we close our eyes and ears to the s e g a corrupt because we are too busy, or too m I y t t e G frightened; when we fail to speak up / s e r u t c and speak out – we strike a blow against i P e f i L freedom and decency and justice.” e m i T / / e g d i r Robert F. Kennedy (1925-1968) on June 21, 1961, in remarks p p E l l before the Joint Defense Appeal of the American Jewish i B y b Committee and the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai o t o h B’rith, Chicago. P “S peaK Up, S peaK oUt : R obeRt F. K ennedy , C hampIon oF SoCIaL JUStICe ,” IS the pRodUCt oF a paRtneRShIp between the RobeRt F. K ennedy memoRIaL , dedICated to advanCIng hUman RIghtS by pRovIdIng InnovatIve SUppoRt to CoURageoUS hUman RIghtS deFendeRS aRoUnd the woRLd ; and new yoRK State UnIted teaCheRS , a StatewIde UnIon oF moRe than 600,000 pRoFeSSIonaLS dedICated to StRengthenIng edUCatIon and heaLth CaRe and advanCIng SoCIaL JUStICe .
  • Louisiana Political Corruption-2018

    Louisiana Political Corruption-2018

    Defending Political Corruption and Abuse of Power Prosecutions in Louisiana Typical Types of Federal Prosecutions of Public Officials • 18 U.S.C. § 201- Public Bribery • 18 U.S.C. § 666- Theft or Bribery Concerning Programs Receiving FeDeral FunDs • 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343- Mail and Wire fraud (honest services frauD) • 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242- Deprivation of Rights anD Conspiracy Against Rights 18 U.S.C. 201- Public Bribery • Offering or promising something of value to a “public official,” or • A “public official” demanding, seeking, receiving, or accepting something of value • Corruptly with the intent to influence or be influenced in the performance of an “official act” (ie. bribery) • Or as a reward for an official act already done, or which is promised to be done in the future (ie. a ”gratuity”) 18 U.S.C. 201 • Who is a “public official”? • Per § 201(a)(1), “The term public official means Member of Congress, Delegate, or ResiDent Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualifieD, or an officer or employee of or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency, or branch of Government thereof, incluDing the District of Columbia, in any official function, unDer or by authority of any such Department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror.” • IncluDes any feDeral employee or anyone who holds ”a position of public trust with official federal responsibilities” and who possesses “some degree of official responsibility for carrying out a federal program or policy.” Dixson v. UniteD States, 465 U.S.
  • University of Cincinnati

    University of Cincinnati

    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 11-Dec-2009 I, Marjon E. Kamrani , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science It is entitled: "Keeping the Faith in Global Civil Society: Illiberal Democracy and the Cases of Reproductive Rights and Trafficking" Student Signature: This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Anne Runyan, PhD Laura Jenkins, PhD Joel Wolfe, PhD 3/3/2010 305 Keeping the Faith in Global Civil Society: Illiberal Democracy and the Cases of Reproductive Rights and Trafficking A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science of the College of Arts and Science by Marjon Kamrani M.A., M.P.A. University of Texas B.A. Miami University March 2010 Committee Chair: Anne Sisson Runyan, Ph.D ABSTRACT What constitutes global civil society? Are liberal assumptions about the nature of civil society as a realm autonomous from and balancing the power of the state and market transferrable to the global level? Does global civil society necessarily represent and/or result in the promotion of liberal values? These questions guided my dissertation which attempts to challenge dominant liberal conceptualizations of global civil society. To do so, it provides two representative case studies of how domestic and transnational factions of the Religious Right, acting in concert with (or as agents of) the US state, and the political opportunity structures it has provided under conservative regimes, gain access to global policy-making forums through a reframing of international human rights discourses and practices pertaining particularly to women’s rights in order to shift them in illiberal directions.
  • The Calculus of Public Corruption Cases: Hidden Decisions in Investigations and Prosecutions

    The Calculus of Public Corruption Cases: Hidden Decisions in Investigations and Prosecutions

    Article The Calculus of Public Corruption Cases: Journal of Criminal Justice and Law: Official Journal of the Law and Public Policy Section Hidden Decisions in Investigations and of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 21‐36 (2019) Prosecutions ©University of Houston‐Downtown Kristine Artello and Jay S. Albanese I Abstract Acts of public corruption can undermine the rule of law and the legitimacy of the state. Holding public officials to the rule of law through the threat of prosecution is a crucial mechanism to give the law meaning in practice. In the United States, nearly all prosecutions for public corruption occur at the federal level, although many defendants in these cases are officials at the state and local levels of government. When corruption cases are brought, they usually result in a conviction via a guilty plea. However, making these cases is difficult, with only about a third of investigations resulting in actual criminal prosecutions, an outcome much different from those seen in white collar or organized crime cases. In this study, we seek to elicit the decision‐making processes that occur in corruption investigation and prosecution. On the basis of 40 interviews with former investigators and former prosecutors, it has been found that experience, access, resources, and institutional barriers are all challenges to successful investigations. At the prosecution stage, prosecutors face a somewhat different set of barriers, including implied legitimacy concerns, thresholds, and potential long‐term repercussions. Implications of these findings for policy and resources are discussed. Keywords Corruption, investigation, prosecution, decision making ___________________________________________________________________________ I L.
  • A Matiter of Judgment, Not a Matter of Opinion

    A Matiter of Judgment, Not a Matter of Opinion

    A MATITER OF JUDGMENT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION EDWARD A. HARTNETr In this Article Professor Hartnett enters the longstanding debate over whether elected officials are obliged to follow the Supreme Court's interpretationof the Constitution. Responding to a call by Professors Larry Aleranderand Frederick Shauer for complete deference to judicial opinions-a stance echoed by a broad range of scholars, now including former auntideference advocate Edwin AMeese- ProfessorHartnett attempts to identify seriousflaws in this position. He maintains that because the scope of tie judicialrole is narrowly limited to deciding cases and controversies, and not "pronouncingthe law," there is a profound distinction be- tween judgments and opinions. Therefor, we should not confuse deference with obedience and grant tire Supreme Court a monopoly on constitutional interpretation. More than one hundred and ninety-five years after Marbury v. Madison,' one hundred and forty years after the Lincoln/Douglas de- bates, 2 forty years after Cooper v. Aaron,3 and a dozen years after Attorney General Edwin Meese was criticized for agreeing with President Lincoln,4 we continue to debate whether elected officials * Visiting Associate Professor of Law, University of Virginia (Fall 1998), Scholar in Residence (Spring 1999); Professor, Seton Hall University. A.B., 1982, Harvard Univer- sity, J.D., 1985, New York University. Earl C. Dudley, Louis Fisher, John C. Harrison, John V. Jacobi, John C. Jeffries, John C. Nagle, Michael S. Paulsen, John M. Rogers, and Charles A. Sullivan contributed valuable insights to this Article. 1 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803) ("It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.
  • Chantilly High School Chantilly, Virginia Presented By

    Chantilly High School Chantilly, Virginia Presented By

    Chantilly High School Chantilly, Virginia Presented by Chantilly High School Music Boosters We’re Glad You’re Here! e’re excited to once again host the East Coast’s premier high school jazz event and showcase the best in jazz Wentertainment. The Chantilly Invitational Jazz Festival was created 34 years ago to provide an opportunity for high school, professional jazz musicians and educators to share, learn, and compete. Over the years, bands, combos, and jazz ensembles from Virginia, Maryland, Tennessee, West Virginia and the District of Columbia have participated. Festival audiences have also heard great performances by the US Army Jazz Ambassadors, the Airmen of Note, the Jazz Consortium Big Band, Capital Bones, ensembles Workshop Jazz from nearby universities and soloists Matt Ni- ess, Tim Eyerman, Dave Detweiler, Jacques Johnson, Karen Henderson, Chris Vadala, Bruce Gates and many others. We’re delighted to welcome the Army Blues, National Jazz Orchestra, No Explanations, and the George Mason Uni- versity Jazz Band our feature ensembles. The Chantilly Invitational Jazz Festival has grown to over thirty groups battling for trophies, scholarships and most importantly, “bragging rights.” We’ve got a packed schedule for this year’s Festival. Again, welcome to the Festival — an annual March weekend which has become a tradition in the Washington area as the place to be for great jazz and special performances. Teresa Johnson, Principal Robyn Lady, Directory of Student Services, Performing Arts Supervisor Doug Maloney, Director of Bands Steve Wallace, V.P. for Bands, Chantilly Music Boosters Chris Singleton, Associate Director of Bands Betsy Watts, President, Chantilly Music Boosters Liz and Tim Lisko, Festival Coordinators Welcome We appreciate the support of all our Music Booster sponsors! We Jazz Festival Sponsors especially wish to recognize our sponsors who contributed directly to the Chantilly Jazz Festival.
  • Feature Article

    Feature Article

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/10/26/trumps-labor-secretary-is-a-wrecking-ball-aimed-at-workers A Reporter at Large October 26, 2020 Issue Trump’s Labor Secretary Is a Wrecking Ball Aimed at Workers As Election Day looms, Eugene Scalia, a cunning lawyer committed to dismantling regulation, is weakening one employee protection after another. By Eyal Press October 19, 2020 Even if Joe Biden wins, Scalia’s deregulation blitz will likely take years to reverse. Illustration by Paul Sahre. Photographs: Yuri Gripas / Bloomberg / Getty (Scalia); Getty (Workers) On February 24, 2010, during a show at SeaWorld Orlando, a trainer named Dawn Brancheau was reclining on a platform in the middle of a stadium pool when Tilikum—the park’s largest killer whale—pulled her into the water and thrashed her around until she drowned. Her death was initially reported as an accident, but a subsequent investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration revealed an “extensive history” of incidents exposing SeaWorld trainers to serious hazards. (It turned out that Tilikum, along with two other whales, had previously drowned a trainer at another park.) OSHA fined SeaWorld seventy‐five thousand dollars for three violations and ordered it to either install barriers or keep trainers Page 1 of 20 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/10/26/trumps-labor-secretary-is-a-wrecking-ball-aimed-at-workers at safe distances during shows. SeaWorld contested OSHA’s actions, and, in 2013, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case. The lawyer representing SeaWorld argued that OSHA, a division of the Labor Department, had improperly threatened the premise of the marine park’s business, which, he claimed, required close contact between trainers and killer whales.