Management Planning for Archaeological Sites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Management Planning for Archaeological Sites Management Planning for Archaeological Sites An International Workshop Organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and Loyola Marymount University 19-22 May 2000 Corinth, Greece Edited by Jeanne Marie Teutónico and Gaetano Palumbo THE GETTY CONSERVATION INSTITUTE Los ANGELES Cover: Temple of Apollo, Corinth, Greece. Photograph by Gaetano Palumbo, 2000. © 2000 J. Paul Getty Trust. Jeanne Marie Teutónico and Gaetano Palumbo, Editors Michelle Ghaffari, Copy Editor Anita Keys, Production Coordinator Jeffrey Cohen, Series Designer Hespenheide Design, Book Designer The Getty Conservation Institute (CCI) works internationally to advance conservation and to enhance and encourage the preservation and understanding of the visual arts in all of their dimensions—objects, collec- tions, architecture, and sites. The Institute serves the conservation community through scientific research; education and training; field projects; and the dissemination of the results of both its work and the work of others in the field. In all its endeavors, the Institute is committed to addressing unanswered questions and promoting the highest possible standards of conservation practice. The GCI is a program of the J. Paul Getty Trust, an international cultural and philanthropic organiza- tion devoted to the visual arts and the humanities that includes an art museum as well as programs for education, scholarship, and conservation. Published by The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, CA 90049-1684 © 2002 J. Paul Getty Trust. Printed in the United States of America 10 9876543 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Management planning for archaeological sites : an international workshop organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and Loyola Marymount University, 19-22 May 2000, Corinth, Greece / edited by Jeanne Marie Teutónico and Gaetano Palumbo. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-89236-691-0 ISBN-10: 0-89236-691-5 1. Excavations (Archaeology)—Congresses. 2. Historic sites—Management—Congresses. 3. Historic sites— Conservation and restoration—Congresses. 4. Archaeology—Methodology—Congresses. 5. Archaeology— Field work—Congresses. 6. Excavations (Archaeology)—Greece—Corinth—Congresses. 7. Corinth (Greece)—Antiquities—Congresses. I. Teutónico, Jeanne Marie. II. Palumbo, Gaetano. III. Getty Conservation Institute. IV Loyola Marymount University. CC76 .A76 2002 930.1'028'3—dc21 2002013572 Contents Timothy P. Whalen v Foreword Jeanne Marie Teutónico and William Fulco vu Préface PART ONE Background Papers Gaetano Palumbo 3 Threats and Challenges to the Archaeological Heritage in the Mediterranean Randall Mason and Erica Avrami 13 Heritage Values and Challenges of Conservation Planning Martha Demás 27 Planning for Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites: A Values-Based Approach PART TWO Case Studies Jeanne Marie Teutónico 57 Introduction Experiences from Europe and Latin America Christopher Young 60 Hadrian's Wall, United Kingdom Carolina Castellanos 68 Chan Chan, Peru Three Sites in the Region Esti Ben Haim 83 Masada, Israel Aysar Akrawi 98 Petra, Jordan Guy Sanders 113 Corinth, Greece Jeanne Marie Teutónico and Gaetano Palumbo 126 Summary of Discussions Martha Demás 129 Annotated Bibliography 155 List of Participants 157 Author Biographies V Foreword T is MY PLEASURE to present this newest addition to the Proceedings series of the Getty Conservation Institute (GCI). The series has a long i history and has dealt with a great variety of topics from wallpaintings conservation to the study of ancient and historic metals to the conserva- tion of grotto sites on the Silk Road. It is one of the many publication venues through which the GCI seeks to advance the conservation and pro- tection of the world's cultural heritage by disseminating information to a broad professional audience. Under the dedicated editorship of Jeanne Marie Teutónico and Gaetano Palumbo, this most recent volume contains the proceedings of a workshop entitled "Management Planning for Archaeological Sites," jointly organized by the GCI and Loyola Marymount University (LMU) near the site of Corinth, Greece, in May 2000. The workshop was attended by more than thirty participants from fourteen countries who gathered together for four days of presentations, site visits, and small group discus- sions focused on issues of archaeological site conservation and manage- ment in the eastern Mediterranean. The GCI has a long-standing commitment to the conservation and management of archaeological sites that is reflected in years of research, teaching, and field projects. In many ways, the Corinth workshop can be seen as a logical outcome of the 1995 conference "The Conservation of Archaeological Sites in the Mediterranean Region," which first brought together a group of professionals from the region to debate the merits of a values-based planning approach. Building on the results of that experi- ence, the Corinth workshop provided an opportunity to focus in a more detailed way on the realities of the region in relation to the theoretical planning model. It is our hope that this publication will promote critical discussion, inspire further research, and advance the conservation and management of archaeological sites worldwide. As always, events such as the Corinth workshop require the intelligence, talent, and enthusiasm of many people. First and foremost, thanks are due to the workshop participants, many of whom are repre- sented as authors in this volume. From the outset, they embraced the workshop's aims and brought energy, ideas, and a spirit of openness to the proceedings. The event and this publication would not have been possible without them. VI Our partner in the event, Loyola Marymount University, brought an invaluable knowledge of the region and its archaeological heritage and promoted the idea of a collaboration with the GCI. Special thanks are extended to Dr. William Fulco, NEH chair in Ancient Mediterranean Studies, who worked closely with GCI staff to develop, organize, and deliver the event, and to Dr. Joseph Jabbra, academic vice president, who supported the institutional collaboration and enthusiastically participated in the workshop. Thanks, too, to Sandra Scham in Jerusalem for facilitat- ing early contacts. Grateful acknowledgment is also due to Yad Hanadiv (The Rothschild Foundation) and to its representative Ariel Weiss for providing initial funding support for the event and for consistently emphasizing the importance of dialogue. The workshop would not have been possible without the assis- tance, collaboration, and hospitality of the local and national authorities in Corinth. We are especially grateful to Angelos Manolakis, prefect of Corinth, who welcomed us to the city and provided the workshop parti- cipants with a generous reception in their honor. We thank Elisabeth Spathari, director of the IV Ephoreia of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, and her colleague Zoe Aslamatzidou for their help in organizing the event and for sharing their knowledge of Corinth and of the administrative framework in which conservation takes place in Greece. We were also very fortunate to count on the collaboration of Guy Sanders, director of the Corinth excavation for the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, who provided invaluable assistance in organiz- ing the site visit to Corinth and the event in general. We also acknowledge the assistance of Nancy Bookidis, who, together with Guy Sanders, pro- vided the workshop participants with an extraordinary in-depth visit to the site. Recognition must also be given to the GCI staff who worked hard over a long period to realize this project. Giora Solar, formerly head of field projects at the GCI, fostered the early partnership with LMU and eventually participated in the workshop as a representative from Israel. On Giora's departure from the GCI, leadership for the event was taken up by Jeanne Marie Teutónico, associate director of the GCI, who worked with an extraordinarily dedicated team of professionals including Gaetano Palumbo, Martha Demás, Randall Mason, Erica Avrami, and Françoise Descamps to prepare and deliver the workshop. Their knowledge, experi- ence, and commitment were critical in giving structure and substance to the initial concept. On the logistical side, the team was ably assisted by Chris Seki of the GCI and Tammy Jones of LMU, who managed to meet numerous administrative and organizational challenges with exceptional grace and efficiency. Finally, in addition to the volume editors, we are indebted to Michelle Ghaffari, who copyedited the manuscript; to Kristin Kelly, head of Public Programs and Communications at the GCI; and to our colleagues at Trust Publications for getting these proceedings into print. Timothy P. Whalen DIRECTOR The Getty Conservation Institute Vil Preface N MAY 2000, an international group of architects, archaeologists, tourism professionals, and government officials met in Loutraki, i Greece, near the ancient site of Corinth, for a workshop on archaeo- logical site management planning that was jointly organized by the Getty Conservation Institute (GCI) and Loyola Marymount University (LMU). The purpose of the workshop was to explore management planning con- cepts that might be useful in addressing the many threats facing archaeo- logical sites in the eastern Mediterranean. For several years, the GCI has taken a leading role in developing, utilizing, and advocating a values-driven planning process for the manage- ment of archaeological sites based
Recommended publications
  • Unifying Spatial and Temporal Methodologies to Understand Archaeological Looting in Egypt
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: BUILDING A BASELINE: UNIFYING SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL METHODOLOGIES TO UNDERSTAND ARCHAEOLOGICAL LOOTING IN EGYPT Michelle R.D. Fabiani, Doctor of Philosophy 2019 Dissertation directed by: Dr. Laura Dugan, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice Archaeological looting – the illegal excavation or removal of an antiquity from the ground or structural complex of an archaeological site – is a persistent issue in many countries. National and international laws, agreements, conventions, and statutes all proscribe the looting transporting, possession, and sale of antiquities illegally removed from archaeological sites. Looting has also generated a lot of academic attention, with scholarship developing in archaeology, sociology, criminology, and law (among others). Despite such legal proscriptions and scholarly contributions to understanding this phenomenon, current efforts have been unable to produce tangible solutions for preventing this crime. Not only has there not yet been extensive scholarship to understand the link between looting and contextual forces, there is a dearth of research on the most effective ways to study these interconnected variables. Using a framework of routine activity theory, this dissertation proposes a new possible approach that considers spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal relationships to establish baseline data on patterns of archaeological looting attempts in Lower Egypt from 2015 to 2017 relative to sociopolitical, economic, and environmental stress — and to begin to address this research gap. Specifically, this dissertation proposes a methodology for collecting and coding data on archaeological looting attempts from satellite imagery. It then applies a series of spatial (clustering, proximity), temporal (SEM, VAR, ARDL), and spatio-temporal methods (clustering, hot spots analysis, spatial time series) to these data to demonstrate the importance of analyzing this phenomena multidimensionally.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States and the International Efforts Against Looting of Antiquities
    Cornell Law Library Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers Faculty Scholarship 2-19-2009 Protecting against Plunder: The nitU ed States and the International Efforts against Looting of Antiquities Asif Efrat Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clsops_papers Part of the Arts and Entertainment Commons, Commercial Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the International Trade Commons Recommended Citation Efrat, Asif, "Protecting against Plunder: The nitU ed States and the International Efforts against Looting of Antiquities" (2009). Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers. Paper 47. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clsops_papers/47 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protecting against Plunder The United States and the International Efforts against Looting of Antiquities Asif Efrat ∗∗∗ Word Count: 21,297 Abstract. In 1970 UNESCO adopted a convention intended to stem the flow of looted antiquities from developing countries to collections in art-importing countries. The majority of art-importing countries, including Britain, Germany, and Japan, refused to join the Convention. Contrary to other art-importing countries, and reversing its own traditionally-liberal policy, the United States accepted the international regulation of antiquities and joined the UNESCO Convention. The article seeks to explain why the United States chose to establish controls on antiquities, to the benefit of foreign countries facing archaeological plunder and to the detriment of the US art market.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Brodie Regulation Perspectives.Pdf
    Historical and Social Perspectives on the Regulation of the International Trade in Archaeological Objects: The Examples of Greece and India Neil Brodie* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................ .. 1051 11. REGULATION AT THE SOURCE OF THE ARTIFACT .......... 1054 A. Example 1: The Greek Cycladic Islands .......... .. 1056 B. Example 2: India .............................................. .. 1059 111. DISCUSSION .................................................................. 1062 I. INTRODUCTION It is a well-established fact that the international antiquities market is responsible for the destruction and vandalism of archaeological and cultural sites worldwide.1 Material removed from these sites is traded across jurisdictions until it can be sold legally and acquired as "art" by private and institutional collectors in North America, Europe and, increasingly, East Asia.2 One consequence of this trade is that most countries outside the United States have now passed laws that protect archaeological heritage by proscribing the unauthorized excavation of antiquities, the export of antiquities, or both.3 Opinions are divided, however, as to the effectiveness and * McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER United Kingdom 1. See e.g., ROGER ATWOOD, STEALING HISTORY: TOMB RAIDERS, SMUGGLERS, AND THE LOOTING OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 11, 241 (2004); NEIL J. BRODIE ET AL., STEALING HISTORY: THE ILLICIT TRADE IN CULTURAL MATERIAL 8 (2000); PATRICK J. O'KEEFE, TRADE IN ANTIQUITIES: REDUCING DESTRUCTION AND THEFT 14-16 (1997). 2. BRODIE ET AL., supra note 1, at 33. 3. See 3 LYNDEL V. PROTT & PATRICK J. O'KEEFE, LAw AND THE CULTURAL HERITAGE: MOVEMENT 429-530 (1989). 1051 1052 VANDERBIL T JOURNAL OF TRANSNA TlONAL LA W {VOl. 38;/051 even the desirability of such strong regulations at the source of the artifacts.4 Opponents of such regulation argue that the prohibitions deter people from declaring antiquities that are discovered by chance.
    [Show full text]
  • For Recording Endangered Archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa.', Geosciences., 7 (4)
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 29 September 2017 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Rayne, L. and Bradbury, J. and Mattingly, D. and Philip, G. and Bewley, R. and Wilson, A. (2017) 'From above and on the ground : geospatial methods for recording endangered archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa.', Geosciences., 7 (4). p. 100. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7040100 Publisher's copyright statement: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0). Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk 1 Type of the Paper (Article, Review, Communication, etc.) 2
    [Show full text]
  • Using Open Source Data to Detect Archaeological Looting And
    Interferometric SAR and Machine Learning: Using Open Source Data to Detect Archaeological Looting and Destruction RESEARCH ARTICLE HASSAN EL-HAJJ *Author affiliations can be found in the back matter of this article ABSTRACT CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Hassan El-Hajj, PhD Candidate Archaeological heritage in the Near East is under an ever increasing threat from multiple Classical Archaeology vectors such as looting and systematic destruction, militarization, and uncontrolled Department, Philipps- urban expansion in the absence of governmental control among others. Physically Universität Marburg, monitoring endangered sites proves to be infeasible due to the dangerous ground Biegenstrasse 10, 35037 Marburg, Germany conditions on the one hand, and the vast area of land on which they are dispersed. In recent years, the abundant availability of Very High Resolution (VHR) imaging satellites [email protected] with short revisit times meant that it was possible to monitor a large portion of these sites from space. However, such images are relatively expensive and beyond the means of many researchers and concerned local authorities. In this paper, I present an KEYWORDS: approach that uses open source data from two of the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Coherence Maps; Near East; Archaeological Looting; Copernicus Constellation, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 in order to generate disturbance Archaeological Destruction; patches, from which looting and destruction areas are classified using Machine Cultural Heritage; Open Source Learning. Such an approach opens the door towards sustainable monitoring over large swaths of land over long periods of time. TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: El-Hajj, H. 2021. Interferometric SAR and Machine Learning: Using Open Source Data to Detect Archaeological Looting and Destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antiquities Market: It’S All in a Price
    heritage & society, Vol. 7 No. 1, May, 2014, 32–46 The Antiquities Market: It’s All in a Price Neil Brodie Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, University of Glasgow, UK Abstract Antiquities have cultural and economic value. Scholarly experts create cultural value, and by creating cultural value they also unintentionally establish economic value. So although antiquities are collected as culturally-important objects, they have also been bought for investment purposes as tangible assets, though with mixed results. Collectors and investors must face the problem of how to assess accurately the cultural and economic value of an antiquity, though again the intervention of scholarly experts is crucial. Scholars themselves benefit finan- cially from even indirect involvement with the antiquities market, and their work can be appropriated and exploited financially as intellectual property. Anti- quities trading is often illicit, and in such conditions profits made from the anti- quities market are proceeds of crime, though that fact is generally overlooked. Resumen Las antigüedades tienen valor económico y cultural. Los eruditos crean valor cultural y, al hacerlo, también generan involuntariamente valor económico. Por lo tanto, aunque las antigüedades se coleccionan como objetos cultural- mente importantes, también se han comprado con fines de inversión como bienes tangibles, aunque con resultados ambivalentes. Los coleccionistas y los inversores deben enfrentar el problema de cómo evaluar con exactitud el valor cultural y económico de una antigüedad, aunque nuevamente la inter- vención de los eruditos es fundamental. Los eruditos se benefician económic- amente hasta de la participación indirecta en el mercado de antigüedades y su trabajo puede apropiarse y aprovecharse económicamente como propiedad intelectual.
    [Show full text]
  • Disentangling Strategic and Opportunistic Looting: the Relationship Between Antiquities Looting and Armed Conflict in Egypt
    arts Article Disentangling Strategic and Opportunistic Looting: The Relationship between Antiquities Looting and Armed Conflict in Egypt Michelle D. Fabiani ID Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-301-405-4733 Received: 30 March 2018; Accepted: 11 June 2018; Published: 14 June 2018 Abstract: Antiquities are looted from archaeological sites across the world, seemingly more often in areas of armed conflict. While this is not the only context in which antiquities are looted, it is an important context and one for which much is still unknown. Previously, the relationship between antiquities looting and armed conflict has been assessed with qualitative case studies and journalistic evidence due to a lack of systematically collected data. This study considers the relationship between antiquities looting and armed conflict in Egypt from 1997 to 2014 with a newly collected time series dataset. Autoregressive Distributed Lag Models (ARDL) with a bounds testing approach are used to assess both the overall relationship between these two phenomena and their temporal ordering. This article finds that antiquities looting and armed conflict are, indeed, statistically related; and that antiquities looting more often precedes armed conflict rather than the other way around. This finding suggests that looting is more strategic than opportunistic. Implications and future directions are discussed. Keywords: antiquities looting; Egypt; armed conflict; strategic looting; opportunistic looting; open source data; ARDL 1. Introduction Antiquities looting has become increasingly prominent in news headlines. Newspapers around the world show headlines reporting antiquities looting from Israel, Cambodia, China, Greece, Italy, Egypt, Peru, Syria, and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Journal of Contemporary Criminal
    Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice http://ccj.sagepub.com/ Congenial Bedfellows? The Academy and the Antiquities Trade Neil Brodie Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 2011 27: 408 DOI: 10.1177/1043986211418885 The online version of this article can be found at: http://ccj.sagepub.com/content/27/4/408 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice can be found at: Email Alerts: http://ccj.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://ccj.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://ccj.sagepub.com/content/27/4/408.refs.html >> Version of Record - Nov 14, 2011 What is This? Downloaded from ccj.sagepub.com at Glasgow University Library on July 31, 2012 CCJ27410.1177/1043986211418885Bro 418885dieJournal of Contemporary Criminal Justice Article Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 27(4) 408 –437 Congenial Bedfellows? © 2011 SAGE Publications Reprints and permission: http://www. The Academy and the sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1043986211418885 Antiquities Trade http://ccj.sagepub.com Neil Brodie1 Abstract The illicit trade in antiquities and other cultural objects is socially harmful in several respects. Private collectors and museums are generally considered culpable in providing end demand by acquiring illicitly traded objects, but this article suggests that the facilitating actions of academic experts have previously been overlooked. Through a series of case studies, it examines different ways in which academic expertise is indispensable for the efficient functioning of the trade and suggests that a knowledge-based ethical environment for academic practice would allow scholars to make more informed choices about the propriety or otherwise of their involvement with the trade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Destruction of Cultural Heritage: a Crime Against Property Or a Crime Against People?
    THE JOHN MARSHALL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW THE DESTRUCTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE: A CRIME AGAINST PROPERTY OR A CRIME AGAINST PEOPLE? PATTY GERSTENBLITH ABSTRACT The destruction of cultural heritage has played a prominent role in the ongoing conflicts in Syria and Iraq and in the recent conflict in Mali. This destruction has displayed the failure of international law to effectively deter these actions. This article reviews existing international law in light of this destruction and the challenges posed by the issues of non-international armed conflict, non-state actors and the military necessity exception. By examining recent developments in applicable international law, the article proposes that customary international law has evolved to interpret existing legal instruments and doctrines concerning cultural heritage in light of the principles of proportionality and distinction and a definition of intentionality that includes extreme negligence and willful disregard. As a result, international law may more effectively foster the preservation of cultural heritage for future generations. Copyright © 2016 The John Marshall Law School Cite as Patty Gerstenblith, The Destruction of Cultural Heritage: A Crime Against Property or a Crime Against People?, 15 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 336 (2016). THE DESTRUCTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE: A CRIME AGAINST PROPERTY OR A CRIME AGAINST PEOPLE? PATTY GERSTENBLITH I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology
    Books Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Edited by Deodato Tapete Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Geosciences www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences MDPI Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Books Special Issue Editor Deodato Tapete MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade MDPI Special Issue Editor Deodato Tapete Italian Space Agency (ASI) Italy Editorial Office MDPI AG St. Alban-Anlage 66 Basel, Switzerland This edition is a reprint of the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Geosciences (ISSN 2076-3263) from 2017–2018 (available at: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences/special_issues/archaeology). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: Books Lastname, F.M.; Lastname, F.M. Article title. Journal Name Year, Article number, page range. First Edition 2018 ISBN 978-3-03842-763-6 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03842-764-3 (PDF) Articles in this volume are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY), which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book taken as a whole is © 2018 MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). MDPI Table of Contents About the Special Issue Editor ..................................................................................................................... vii Preface to “Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology” ........................................................... ix Deodato Tapete Remote Sensing and Geosciences for Archaeology Reprinted from: Geosciences 2018, 8(2), 41; doi: 10.3390/geosciences8020041 ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Herod I, Flavius Josephus, and Roman Bathing
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts HEROD I, FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS, AND ROMAN BATHING: HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY IN DIALOG A Thesis in History by Jeffrey T. Herrick 2009 Jeffrey T. Herrick Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2009 The thesis of Jeffrey T. Herrick was reviewed and approved* by the following: Garrett G. Fagan Associate Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies and History Thesis Advisor Paul B. Harvey Associate Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, History, and Religious Studies, Head of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Ann E. Killebrew Associate Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Jewish Studies, and Anthropology Carol Reardon Director of Graduate Studies in History; Professor of Military History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT In this thesis, I examine the historical and archaeological evidence for the baths built in late 1st century B.C.E by King Herod I of Judaea (commonly called ―the Great‖). In the modern period, many and diverse explanations of Herod‘s actions have been put forward, but previous approaches have often been hamstrung by inadequate and disproportionate use of either form of evidence. My analysis incorporates both forms while still keeping important criticisms of both in mind. Both forms of evidence, archaeological and historical, have biases, and it is important to consider their nuances and limitations as well as the information they offer. In the first chapter, I describe the most important previous approaches to the person of Herod and evaluate both the theoretical paradigms as well as the methodologies which governed them.
    [Show full text]
  • Year 4 Petra Reading and Grammar Activities
    Wonders of the World UKS2 Reading Comprehension Activity Petra Visit the Creative Primary Literacy store for more Literacy resources including playscripts, creative writing ideas and close reading activities. Thanks to LoggaWiggler for the photo! Wonders of the World – Petra Petra is a historical and archaeological city in southern Jordan. It lies within the mountains of the Arabah valley that runs from the Dead Sea to the Gulf of Aqaba. Petra is believed to have been settled in as early as 9000 BC, and it was possibly established in the 4th century BC as the capital city of the Nabataean Kingdom. The earliest historical reference to Petra was in 312 BC when Greek historians wrote about an unsuccessful attack on the city. The Nabataeans were used to living in deserts, and were able to defeat any attacks by taking advantage of the area's terrain. Petra flourished in the 1st century AD, when its population peaked at an estimated 20,000 people. The Nabataean kingdom became a client state of the Roman Empire in the first century BC, but it wasn’t until 106 AD that it lost its independence. Petra fell to the Romans, who renamed it as Arabia Petraea. Petra's importance then declined as sea trade routes emerged, and an earthquake destroyed many of its structures. By the early Islamic era Petra was abandoned except for a handful of nomads. It remained unknown to the world until it was rediscovered again in 1812 by Johann Ludwig Burckhardt. Famous for its rock-cut architecture and water system, Petra is also called the Rose City due to the color of the stone out of which it is carved.
    [Show full text]