Accessible Transcript: Fight for Civil Rights

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accessible Transcript: Fight for Civil Rights Accessible Transcript: The Fight for Civil Rights for People with Disabilities Welcome to “The Fight for Civil Rights for People with Disabilities.” The Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law 25 years ago. This historic milestone wasn’t the work of one person or even a small group of people. And, it didn’t happen overnight. Thousands of courageous people with disabilities, activists and advocates for disability rights, legislators and the legal community worked tirelessly on many fronts for more than 50 years. This presentation is based on a collection of 31 stories that capture key “Moments in Disability History.” They can be found on the Minnesota Governor’s Council on Developmental Disabilities’ website. These stories represent just a fraction of the fascinating historic events that eventually led to the passage of the ADA. Welcome to CLE Training In this webinar, you will learn about some of the key events that led to the passage of the ADA and the contributions of four important social movements. They are the Parent Movement, the Independent Living Movement, the Self-Advocacy Movement and, finally, the Disability Rights Movement. You also will learn about the personal experiences of people with disabilities and how their powerful stories of discrimination, inequality and segregation helped frame the debate for passing the ADA. Finally, you will be introduced to some of the key activists, judicial representatives, Congressional representatives and others who played pivotal roles in passing the ADA. How to Navigate this Course: Part 1 Before we get started, let’s go over how to navigate this webinar. There is a navigation bar at the bottom of the screen. If for any reason you need to pause the training, click the Pause button. To continue to play the training simply click the Play button. The Speaker button allows you to turn the audio on or off. In addition, the sidebar of this webinar provides you four different types of information: • An outline of the topics • Thumbnails of the slides Page 1 of 23 • A script of the narration • and a search function Click on any of these tabs to view this information. How to Navigate this Course: Part 2 Throughout the webinar, an arrow button may appear on the screen which allows you to play additional videos and audio clips contained on external websites. When clicking the arrow button, a new browser window will open. To continue, click the play button to play the video or audio clip. When you’re done, close the browser window and click the Play button within the webinar to continue. People First Language Now, let’s get started. It’s important to understand the power of language. Historically, society has defined people with disabilities in terms of their limitations and deficiencies, often using words and labels that are considered offensive, derogatory and insensitive today. At times, this presentation refers to historical documents that reflect the cultural norms and language of the times. Hopefully, you will find this language uncomfortable and recognize how these labels reinforce negative stereotypes and continue to stigmatize people with disabilities. In the interest of accuracy, these references have not been revised to reflect the more respectful “people first” language preferred today. “People first” language emphasizes the individual, not a disability. As members of the legal community, the words you use can help to create a more inclusive, respectful society. Click the arrow button on the screen to view this clear explanation made by an individual with an intellectual disability at the first national self-advocacy conference in 1974. http://mn.gov/mnddc/parallels/seven/7b/7b_html/7b_5vid.html The Parent Movement: Part 1 The ADA can trace its roots to the late 1940s and early 1950s when parents began to organize and demand services for their children with disabilities. To understand the significance of a national parent movement, it’s important to recognize that, at the time, most people pitied or feared individuals with developmental disabilities. Parents were ashamed and often overtly blamed for their children’s disabilities. The vast majority of people with developmental disabilities lived out of sight in dangerously overcrowded, understaffed public institutions. Medical professionals routinely told parents to place children with developmental disabilities in institutions and Page 2 of 23 to forget about them. Parents who chose to keep their children with disabilities at home were instructed to place the child face down in a stroller when out in public so that no one would see him or her. The Parent Movement: Part 2 In 1950, ninety parents from across the United States traveled to Minneapolis to participate in the first national conference for parents of children with intellectual disabilities. The Arc, the United States’ first national parents’ organization, was created at the conference. 65 years later, the Arc continues to be a leading advocate for the rights of people with disabilities. At the 1950 conference, parents agreed to focus on working to pass legislation that would help children with disabilities receive training, encourage research in the field and educate the public that children with disabilities can be trained to be productive citizens. As one parent said in a local newspaper account, “We hope someday that our sons and daughters will not be tax burdens.” Gov. Youngdahl’s List of Rights Minnesota Governor Luther Youngdahl was the keynote speaker at the conference in 1950. During his remarks he became one of the first public officials to speak openly about the rights of people with disabilities. Click the arrow button on the screen to hear Youngdahl’s comments on the rights of children with disabilities. http://mn.gov/mnddc/parallels/five/5a/4.html Brown v. Board of Education – 1954 There are many parallels between the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s and the disability rights movement that would soon follow. For example, the 1954 Brown versus Board of Education decision concluded racial segregation in schools is “inherently unequal” and is consequently unconstitutional. This decision, that guaranteed the right to an equal education for children of all races, would later become the model for the PARC versus the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania lawsuit that would guarantee the educational rights of children with developmental disabilities in 1971. Public demand for change, along with these and other lawsuits would eventually lead to Congressional action. Page 3 of 23 Ed Roberts – 1960s: Part 1 By the 1960s, the Parent Movement was well-established. Many of the children who were the focus of the Parent Movement were now young adults demanding the opportunity to be independent and the support services that would make that happen. This helped to set the stage for the birth of the Independent Living Movement. Ed Roberts is the nationally recognized leader and founder of the Independent Living movement. After contracting polio at age 14, he was paralyzed from the neck down. Despite roadblocks thrown in his way by the educational system, Ed was able to graduate from high school. After fighting and ultimately winning the right to attend the University of California Berkeley, one headline read: “Helpless Cripple Attends U C Berkeley in Wheelchair.” He entered the University of California Berkeley in 1962, the same year that James Meredith entered the University of Mississippi. Ed Roberts – 1960s: Part 2 It is impossible to measure the profound impact that Ed had on disability rights. His accomplishments include starting the Physically Disabled Students Program at Berkeley and creating the Berkeley Center for Independent Living. He created the first curb cut, making the city of Berkeley accessible to people of all ages and abilities. He received a MacArthur Fellowship. At one point, the California Department of Rehabilitation judged Ed incapable of being employed. He went on to head that same agency for eight years. He traveled the world and he changed it. Click the arrow button on the screen to hear Ed Roberts discuss the importance of inclusion. http://mn.gov/mnddc/parallels/six/6b/6b_html/6b_13vid.html Newspaper Exposés – 1960s: Part 1 Throughout history, the media has played an important role in furthering disability rights. After World War II, several newspapers ran articles exposing the horrific conditions in the nation’s institutions. Page 4 of 23 Funding to institutions had been reduced, leading to dangerous understaffing. In some institutions, 1 staff member supervised 100 residents. Residents were chained to benches and one toilet was shared by hundreds of people. Unfortunately, these conditions steadily deteriorated. By 1960, approximately 200,000 with developmental disabilities lived in public institutions in the United States. Yet, their care was grossly underfunded. In 1964, the per diem rate for a person living in an institution was $5.57, about one-half of the daily amount allotted to tend animals in a zoo. Newspaper Exposés – 1960s: Part 2 Another round of media exposés in the 1960s and 1970s prompted demand for significant changes to the system. These images show the dehumanization that occurred in the nation’s institutions. When experts from Sweden and Norway traveled to America in the 1960s to investigate conditions in U.S. institutions, local headlines declared that Scandinavians treated their cattle better than we treated people with disabilities. Newspaper Exposés – 1960s: Part 3 One newspaper article used three photos to illustrate the sterile conditions in an institution. Whether the resident is a child, a teenager or an adult, their physical surroundings don’t change to reflect the group’s age or interests. All are sterile, cold and uninviting. Newspaper Exposés – 1960s: Part 4 In 1966, Burton Blatt published Christmas in Purgatory, one of the most famous and influential exposés. Using a hidden camera, Blatt and Fred Kaplan captured life inside the public institutions.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to Quality Individualized Education Program (IEP) Development and Implementation
    The University of the State of New York The State Education Department Guide to Quality Individualized Education Program (IEP) Development and Implementation February 2010 (Revised December 2010) THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University MERRYL H. TISCH, Chancellor, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. .................................................. New York MILTON L. COFIELD, Vice Chancellor, B.S., M.B.A., Ph.D. .................................... Rochester ROBERT M. BENNETT, Chancellor Emeritus, B.A., M.S. ........................................ Tonawanda SAUL B. COHEN, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.......................................................................... Larchmont JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. .......................................................... Plattsburgh ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. ............................................................................ Syracuse GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ............................................................. Belle Harbor HARRY PHILLIPS, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. .................................................................... Hartsdale JOSEPH E. BOWMAN, JR., B.A., M.L.S., M.A., M.Ed., Ed.D..................................... Albany JAMES R. TALLON, JR., B.A., M.A. ......................................................................... Binghamton ROGER TILLES, B.A., J.D. ....................................................................................... Great Neck KAREN BROOKS HOPKINS, B.A., M.F.A..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality and the Disability Rights Movement: the Black Panthers, the Butterfly Brigade, and the United Farm Workers of America
    JW Marriott Austin, Texas July 19-23, 2021 Intersectionality and the Disability Rights Movement: The Black Panthers, the Butterfly Brigade, and the United Farm Workers of America Paul Grossman, J.D., P.A. Mary Lee Vance, Ph.D. Jamie Axelrod, M.S. JW Marriott Austin, Texas July 19-23, 2021 Faculty Grossman, Axelrod and Vance Consulting, Beyond the ADA Paul Grossman, J.D., P.A. US, ED, OCR, Chief Regional Civil Rights Attorney, SF, retired Guest Lecturer for Disability Law, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Hastings and Berkeley Colleges of Law, U.C. NAADAC, OCR DisNet, & CAPED Faculty Member Former AHEAD Board Member; Blosser Awardee AHEAD and CHADD Public Policy Committees Member The Law of Disability Discrimination for Higher Education Professionals, Carolina Academic Press (updated annually) JW Marriott Austin, Texas July 19-23, 2021 Faculty Grossman, Axelrod and Vance Consulting, Beyond the ADA Jamie Axelrod, M.S. Mary Lee Vance, Ph.D. Dir., Disability Resources, Northern Arizona University Dir., Services for Students with Disabilities, Sacramento State University ADA Coordinator/Section 504 Compliance Officer, Northern Arizona Former AHEAD Bd. Member; University Member, JPED Editorial Bd.; Immediate Past President AHEAD Board Member, Coalition for Disability Reviewer, NACADA National Advising Journal Access in Health Science and Education Co-editor, Beyond the ADA (NASPA 2014) Member AHEAD Public Policy Committee JW Marriott Austin, Texas July 19-23, 2021 Caveat This presentation and its associated materials are provided for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as legal advice. You should seek your Systemwide or house counsel to resolve the individualized legal issues that you are responsible for addressing.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Use of Mobile Resources to Enhance Paralympic Boccia Teaching and Learning for Students with Cerebral Palsy
    12th International Conference Mobile Learning 2016 UNDERSTANDING THE USE OF MOBILE RESOURCES TO ENHANCE PARALYMPIC BOCCIA TEACHING AND LEARNING FOR STUDENTS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY Fabiana Zioti, Giordano Clemente, Raphael de Paiva Gonçalves, Matheus Souza, Aracele Fassbinder and Ieda Mayumi Kawashita Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of South of Minas Gerais IFSULDEMINAS – Campus Muzambinho ABSTRACT This paper aims to discuss about how mobile technologies and resources can be used to support teaching and improving the performance of students with cerebral palsy during out-door classes in the paralympic boccia court. The Educational Design Research has been used to help us to identify the context and to build two interventions: i) using an online boccia game and ii) developing a digital booklet to support teaching and learning paralympic boccia. KEYWORDS Teaching; Disability Sports; Adapted or Paralympic boccia; Cerebral Palsy; Assistive Technology; M-Learning. 1. INTRODUCTION According to the last results from the Brazilian Population Census performed in 2010, the total Brazilian population was about 200 million inhabitants and nearly 46 million people have some form of disability. Considering this question, many teachers of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of South of Minas Gerais at Muzambinho city, in the countryside of Brazil, have been developing academic projects to promote learning and inclusion in the local community. One project aims to promote sports initiation and enhancing the full potential of students with disabilities through paralympic boccia activities in a local and formal school for adults and children with special needs. The paralympic boccia is similar to the conventional boccia, it means the player aims to touch balls in the target ball (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Government
    FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Chapter 5 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 261 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES George W. Bush – Texas (R) Term: Serving second term expiring January 2009. Profession: Businessman; Professional Baseball Team Owner; Texas Governor, 1995-2000. Education: Received B.S., Yale University, 1968; M.B.A., Harvard University, 1975. Military Service: Texas Air National Guard, 1968-1973. Residence: Born in New Haven, CT. Resident of Texas. Family Members: Wife, Laura Welch Bush; two daughters. www.whitehouse.gov VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES Richard B. Cheney – Wyoming (R) Term: Serving second term expiring January 2009. Profession: Public Official; White House Chief of Staff to President Gerald Ford, 1975-1977; U.S. Congressman, Wyoming, 1979-1989; Secretary of Defense, 1989-1993; Chief Executive Officer of the Halliburton Company. Education: Received B.A., University of Wyoming, 1965; M.A., University of Wyoming, 1966. Residence: Born in Lincoln, NE. Resident of Wyo- ming. Family Members: Wife, Lynne V. Cheney; two daugh- ters. www.whitehouse.gov 262 IOWA OFFICIAL REGISTER U.S. SENATOR Charles E. Grassley – New Hartford (R) Term: Serving fifth term in U.S. Senate expiring January 2011. Profession and Activities: Farmer and partner with son, Robin. Member: Baptist Church, Farm Bureau, Iowa Historical Society, Pi Gamma Mu, Kappa Delta Pi, Mason, International Association of Machinists, 1962-1971. Member: Iowa House of Representatives, 1959-1975; U.S. House of Representatives, 1975-1981. Elected to U.S. Senate, 1980; reelected 1986, 1992,
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies to Include Students with Severe/Multiple Disabilities Within the General Education Classroom
    Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 2018, 37(2), 1-12. doi: 10.14434/pders.v37i2.24881 © Division for Physical, Health and Multiple Disabilities PDERS ISSN: 2372-451X http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/pders/index Article STRATEGIES TO INCLUDE STUDENTS WITH SEVERE/MULTIPLE DISABILITIES WITHIN THE GENERAL EDUCATION CLASSROOM Wendy Rogers Kutztown University Nicole Johnson Kutztown University ______________________________________________________________________________ Abstact: Federal legislation such as IDEA (1997) and NCLB (2001) have led to an increase in the number of students with significant disabilities receiving instruction in the general education classroom. This inclusionary movement has established a more diverse student population in which general and special education teachers are responsible for providing instruction that meets the needs of all their students. Although most research focuses on effective inclusionary practices for students with high incidence disabilities (e.g., learning disabilities), literature has revealed a dramatic increase in the number of students with severe/multiple disabilities receiving support in general education settings. Therefore, it is imperative that educators acquire the effective inclusive practices necessary to meet the unique needs of students with severe/multiple disabilities. A review of literature was conducted to determine effective ways to include and support students with severe/multiple disabilities within the general education classroom. Keywords:
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Assessment for Special Education
    Report of Assessment for Special Education Training and Technical Assistance Guide Preview Edition Table of Contents RPT 1A: RPT 1C: Student Information Student Information Validity and Reliability Assessment Conditions Reason for Assessment Strengths, Interests, Concerns Related to Area(s) of Assessment Educational Background Observations Results of Attempted General Ed. Interventions Assessment Results and Interpretation Previous or Current Special Ed. Programs Assessment Results and Interpretation(continued) Additional Educational Background Assessment Results and Interpretation(continued 2) General Medical/Health Findings Add Page Medications Add Page(continued) Vision/Hearing Family, Environmental, Cultural, Economical Factors RPT 1D: Conclusion RPT 1B: Recommendations Student Information Assistive/Augmentative Devices or Tools English Language Learners Need for Special Education and Related Services SIRAS Student Information Example English Language Learners: English Proficiency English Language Development Language of Assessment Simply click any of these titles and you will automatically be directed to the page Additional English Learner Information containing the respective information. Table of Contents Eligibility Student Information Hard of Hearing: Speech or Language Impairment: Criteria Criteria Autism: Explanation & Comments Criteria(continued) Criteria Criteria(continued 2) Criteria(continued) Intellectual Disability: Criteria(continued 3) Explanation & Comments Criteria Explanation & Comments Explanation & Comments Deaf-Blindness:
    [Show full text]
  • 4. IOWA Iowa Is the State Famous for Holding Presidential Caucuses Rather Than a Presidential Primary. There Is a Good Reason F
    4. IOWA Iowa is the state famous for holding presidential caucuses rather than a presidential primary. There is a good reason for that. The state of New Hampshire has a tradition of holding the first presidential primary. In fact, New Hampshire has a law requiring that the New Hampshire primary be one week before the presidential primary of any other state. By scheduling caucuses rather than a primary, Iowa is able to hold its caucuses ahead of New Hampshire and thereby escape the political ire of New Hampshirites. Iowa also thus prevents New Hampshire from scheduling its primary one week ahead of the presidential caucuses in Iowa. That is what that famous New Hampshire law would require if Iowa held a primary. It was in 1972 that Iowa first scheduled its "First In The Nation" presidential caucuses. Four years later, in 1976, the Iowa caucuses were propelled to major importance when Jimmy Carter, a little-known former governor of Georgia, devoted virtually a year of his life to campaigning in Iowa. Carter's surprise victory in the Iowa caucuses made him the instant front-runner for the Democratic nomination. It was an advantage which Carter exploited so well he was eventually elected president of the United States. But there is also a downside to the Iowa caucuses for presidential hopefuls. Iowa can be the burial ground for a candidacy instead of the launching pad. That is what happened to U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts in 1980 when he challenged incumbent President Jimmy Carter for the Democratic nomination. President Carter polled 59 percent of the Iowa caucuses vote to 31 percent for Kennedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • OPERATING GUIDELINE DEAF-BLINDNESS Deaf-Blindness
    OPERATING GUIDELINE DEAF-BLINDNESS Boerne ISD 130901 Legal Framework: Deaf-Blindness Category: Evaluation “Whether a child’s disability ‘adversely affects a child’s educational performance’ is considered for all disability categories in 34 CFR §300.8(c), because, to be eligible, a child must qualify as a child with a disability under 34 CFR §300.8 and need special education because of a particular impairment or condition. Although the phrase ‘adversely affects educational performance’ is not specifically defined, the extent of the impact that the child’s impairment or condition has on the child’s educational performance is a decisive factor in a child’s eligibility determination under Part B. A range of factors—both academic and nonacademic—can be considered in making this determination for each individual child. See 34 CFR §300.306(c). Even if a child is advancing from grade to grade or is placed in the regular educational environment for most or all of the school day, the group charged with making the eligibility determination still could determine that the child’s impairment or condition adversely affects the child’s educational performance because the child could not progress satisfactorily in the absence of specific instructional adaptations or supportive services, including modifications to the general education curriculum. 34 CFR §300.101(c) (regarding requirements for individual eligibility determinations for children advancing from grade to grade).” OSEP Letter to Anonymous (November 28, 2007). “Assessments or other evaluation materials must be provided and administered in the child's native language or other mode of communication and in the form most likely to yield accurate information on what the child knows and can do academically, developmentally, and functionally, unless it is clearly not feasible to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability Timeline - Advocacy
    Disability Timeline - Advocacy 1841 Dorothea Dix begins to advocate for people with disabilities held in prisons and ACT INST Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the poorhouses. PSY USA Disability Rights Movement. WOM 1854 New England Gallaudet Association of the Deaf founded Montpelier, Vermont. ACT DF Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the ORG USA Disability Rights Movement. 1878 Modified Braille demonstrated by Joel W. Smith to American Association of ACT BLI Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the Instructors of the Blind. Rejecting it, association instead continues to support New EDU ORG Disability Rights Movement. York Point, even though blind readers complain it is more difficult to read and write. USA "War of the Dots" ensues, with blind advocates mostly favoring Modified Braille, while sighted teachers and administrators, who control transcription funds, back New York Point. 1880 National Convention of Deaf Mutes in Cincinnati, Ohio. Gathering ultimately leads ACT DF Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the to founding of National Association of the Deaf (NAD), which will resist oralism ORG USA Disability Rights Movement. and suppression of American Sign Language. 1901 National Fraternal Society of the Deaf founded by graduates of Michigan School ACT DF Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the for the Deaf. As only fraternal life insurance company run by Deaf people, advocates L&P ORG Disability Rights Movement. during first half of 20th century for Deaf people's rights to buy insurance and get USA driver's licenses. 1908 Clifford Beers, A Mind That Found Itself, exposes abusive conditions in public and ACT INST Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the private mental hospitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Senator Tom Harkin*
    FOREWORD Senator Tom Harkin* Over the past 25 years the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has been one of the most successful pieces of civil rights legislation in United States history.1 Since its inception, the ADA has been supplemented with regulations and rules enforced by the Department of Labor, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Department of Transportation, Federal Communications Commissions, and Department of Justice, among others, which provide individuals with disabilities a broad range of rights including access to public transit, buildings, and facilities, as well as the judicial system for issues concerning employment discrimination.2 But implementation of the ADA has not occurred without setbacks. Following its passage, the United States Supreme Court overly restricted the ADA by limiting interpretations of the definition of “disability” and whether a disability “substantially limits” the individual and affects a “major life activity” of the individual, two necessary requirements within the ADA for an individual to be covered under the law.3 The four major goals of the ADA are to provide “equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency” to persons * Senator Tom Harkin’s signature legislative achievement is The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Almost 20 years after its enactment, Senator Harkin and Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) introduced the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 to preserve the intent of the ADA after several court rulings weakened its standards and to ensure continuing protections from discrimination for all Americans with disabilities. It was signed into law in September 2008, and in November 2008, Senator Harkin made history by becoming the first Iowa Democrat to win a fifth term in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • IL Movement Where We Have Been Where We Are Going
    IL NET an ILRU/NCIL National Training and Technical Assistance Project Expanding the Power of the Independent Living Movement The Independent Living Movement: Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going A National Teleconference & Webcast Participant’s Manual April 12, 2004 Contributors to the training materials: Steve Brown June Kailes Maggie Shreve Julia Sain Paul Longmore Anne-Marie Hughey Kristy Langbehn June Sutherland Tim Fuchs i © 2004 IL NET, an ILRU/NCIL Training and Technical Assistance Project ILRU Program NCIL 2323 S. Shepherd Street 1916 Wilson Boulevard Suite 1000 Suite 209 Houston, Texas 77019 Arlington, Virginia 22201 713-520-0232 (V) 703-525-3406 (V) 713-520-5136 (TTY) 703-525-4153 (TTY) 713-520-5785 (FAX) 703-525-3409 (FAX) [email protected] 1-877-525-3400 (V/TTY - toll free) http://www.ilru.org [email protected] http://www.ncil.org Permission is granted for duplication of any portion of this manual, providing that the following credit is given to the project: Developed as part of the IL NET: an ILRU/NCIL National Training and Technical Assistance Project. Substantial support for development of this publication was provided by the Rehabilitation Services Administration, U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement of the Department of Education should be inferred. The IL NET is a collaborative project of Independent Living Research Utilization (ILRU) and the National Council on Independent Living (NCIL), with funding from the Rehabilitation Services Administration through Agreement No. H132B99002. IL NET Presents: The Independent Living Movement: Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going Page ii The Independent Living Movement: Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going A National Teleconference & Webcast April 12, 2004 Participant’s Manual Table of Contents Agenda..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]