This Week's Sale Plants
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Some of the Best Vines and Ground Covers for Massachusetts Gardens**
ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 13 MARCH 6, 1953 NUMBERS 1-2 SOME OF THE BEST VINES AND GROUND COVERS FOR MASSACHUSETTS GARDENS** the past two years, two issues of Arnoldia have dealt with some of DURINGthe best shrubs and trees for Massachusetts gardens. (Arnoldia 11 : No. 1, March 9, 1951 ; Vol. 11 : No. 1, March 7, 195~?~. This issue, dealing with vines and ground covers will complete this series. Everything which was said in those bulletins on what constitutes "the best" and how such plants are chosen, is also applicable here to the vines and ground covers. It should be re-emphasized here however, that nothing is implied in the following discussions of the selected types, that would indicate some of the others listed on pages 18 and 19 are not just as serviceable. The recommended ones might be used considerably more than they are at present. It is especially important to note that each plant in the following list is avail- able from at least one of the listed nurserymen. It was impossible to contact all the nurserymen in the state, so there are undoubtedly many other sources in the state for these plants. Since they are available, your local nurseryman can obtain them for you, if he will. Glowing descriptions of plants that are unobtainable may play on the imagina- tion, but it is useless to become enthusiastic about them until they are obtain- able. Each one of these listed is available in 1953. Consequently, the gardeners of the state are urged to become better acquainted with these vines and ground covers, buy a few that are hardy and in this way increase the beauty and interest of the home grounds. -
Plant Descriptions 2018 4/22/2018
Tyler Plant Sale - Plant Descriptions 2018 4/22/2018 TypeDesc Botanical Common Season of Exposure Size Description Name Name Interest Woody: Vine Clematis Clematis Summer to Sun to 8-10' Clematis 'Cardinal Wyszynski' dazzles your garden with huge 8" glowing 'Cardinal Fall Partial crimson flowers. The vibrant flowers are accented with darker crimson Wyszynski' Shade anthers and light pink filaments. Blooms in June-July and again in September. Attracts pollinators. Easy to grow in a rich, porous, alkaline soil. Provide shade for the roots with a generous layer of mulch or a shallow-rooted groundcover near the base of the vine. Received the Golden Medal at 'Plantarium' in 1990. Woody: Vine Clematis Hybrid Summer Sun to 6-8’ Fully double white flowers have yellow anthers and green outer petals. 'Duchess of Clematis Partial They are borne on the previous year’s growth and the current season’s Edinburgh' Shade new growth. This clematis does not require heavy pruning, remove only weak or dead stems in late spring. Tolerates most garden soils, needs protection from cold winds. Woody: Vine Clematis Clematis Early Sun to 8-10’ A beautiful, compact vine that covers itself with 5” shell pink flowers in 'Hagley Summer Partial summer. 'Hagley Hybrid' is also know as Pink Chiffon. This is a large- Hybrid' Shade flowering clematis that can be grown as a container plant. It is best keep out of full sun to prevent bleaching of flowers. Prefers moist, well-drained soil and for best results, mulch. TypeDesc Botanical Common Season of Exposure Size Description Name Name Interest Woody: Vine Clematis x Clematis Summer to Sun to 6-10' This deciduous hybrid clematis, has unusual and very striking deep blue durandii Fall Partial flowers with creamy stamens on a non-clinging, scrambling vine. -
Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. Info
Scientific Name Common Name Region 6 Habit Scientific Name Common Name Region 6 Habit Abies balsamea FIR,BALSAM FACW NT Amaranthus californicus AMARANTH,CALIFORNIA NI ANF Abutilon theophrasti VELVET-LEAF NI AIF Amaranthus crassipes AMARANTH,TROPICAL FAC+ AIF Acacia greggii ACACIA,CATCLAW UPL NST Amaranthus greggii AMARANTH,GREGGIS FAC ANF Acacia smallii HUISACHE FACU NTS Amaranthus obcordatus AMARANTH,TRANS PECOS NI ANF Acalypha rhomboidea COPPER-LEAF,COMMON UPL* ANF Amaranthus palmeri AMARANTH,PALMER'S FACU- ANF Acalypha virginica MERCURY,THREE-SEEDED UPL* ANF Amaranthus retroflexus AMARANTH,RED-ROOT FACU- ANF Acer negundo BOX-ELDER FACW- NT Amaranthus rudis AMARANTH,TALL FAC ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,DRUMMOND RED FACW NT Amaranthus spinosus AMARANTH,SPINY FACU- ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,TRIDENT RED NI NT Amaranthus tuberculatus AMARANTH,ROUGH-FRUIT NI ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,RED FAC NT Ambrosia artemisiifolia RAGWEED,ANNUAL FACU- ANF Acer saccharinum MAPLE,SILVER FAC NT Ambrosia grayi BURSAGE,WOOLLY-LEAF FACW PNF Acer saccharum MAPLE,SUGAR UPL NT Ambrosia psilostachya RAGWEED,NAKED-SPIKE FAC- PNF Achillea millefolium YARROW,COMMON FACU PNF Ambrosia trifida RAGWEED,GREAT FAC ANF Acorus calamus SWEETFLAG OBL PIEF Amelanchier alnifolia SERVICE-BERRY,SASKATOON FAC- NS Adiantum capillus-veneris FERN,SOUTHERN MAIDEN-HAIR FACW+ PNF3 Amelanchier arborea SERVICE-BERRY,DOWNY FACU NT Adiantum pedatum FERN,NORTHERN MAIDEN-HAIR FAC PNF3 Amianthium muscaetoxicum FLYPOISON FAC PNF Adiantum tricholepis FERN,HAIRY MAIDEN-HAIR FAC PNF3 Ammannia auriculata AMMANNIA,RED-STEM -
The Wetland Condition Index (WCI): Biological Indicators of Wetland Condition for Isolated Depressional Herbaceous Wetlands in Florida
The Wetland Condition Index (WCI): Biological Indicators of Wetland Condition for Isolated Depressional Herbaceous Wetlands in Florida Report Submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection under Contract #WM-683 By Charles R. Lane with Mark T. Brown, Mike Murray-Hudson, and M. Benjamin Vivas H.T. Odum Center for Wetlands University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-6350 September 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported under a research contract from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP); M.T. Brown, principal investigator. We would like to acknowledge the support of FDEP staff, especially Russ Frydenborg, Ashley O’Neal, Ellen McCarron, Liz Miller, Lori Wolfe, Joy Jackson, Johnny Richardson, and the FDEP Central Laboratory in Tallahassee. Additional acknowledgement is due to the research group of the H.T. Odum Center for Wetlands, especially Kelly Reiss, Matt Cohen, Jim Surdick, and Susan Carstenn. We also thank the members of the 1999 and 2000 field crew for their tireless and enthusiastic work, especially Mark Fowlkes, Mark Otto, and Michael Stevens. Steven Doherty was an integral part of the initial stages of this research, and his perseverance and hard work helped to ensure this research to fruition. This project and the preparation of this report were funded in part by a Section 319 Nonpoint Source Management grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through a contract with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. -
Ranunculaceae) for Asian and North American Taxa
Mosyakin, S.L. 2018. Further new combinations in Anemonastrum (Ranunculaceae) for Asian and North American taxa. Phytoneuron 2018-55: 1–11. Published 13 August 2018. ISSN 2153 733X FURTHER NEW COMBINATIONS IN ANEMONASTRUM (RANUNCULACEAE) FOR ASIAN AND NORTH AMERICAN TAXA SERGEI L. MOSYAKIN M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2 Tereshchenkivska Street Kiev (Kyiv), 01004 Ukraine [email protected] ABSTRACT Following the proposed re-circumscription of genera in the group of Anemone L. and related taxa of Ranunculaceae (Mosyakin 2016, Christenhusz et al. 2018) and based on recent molecular phylogenetic and partly morphological evidence, the genus Anemonastrum Holub is recognized here in an expanded circumscription (including Anemonidium (Spach) Holub, Arsenjevia Starod., Tamuria Starod., and Jurtsevia Á. Löve & D. Löve) covering members of the “Anemone ” clade with x=7, but excluding Hepatica Mill., a genus well outlined morphologically and forming a separate subclade (accepted by Hoot et al. (2012) as Anemone subg. Anemonidium (Spach) Juz. sect. Hepatica (Mill.) Spreng.) within the clade earlier recognized taxonomically as Anemone subg. Anemonidium (sensu Hoot et al. 2012). The following new combinations at the section and subsection ranks are validated: Anemonastrum Holub sect. Keiskea (Tamura) Mosyakin, comb. nov . ( Anemone sect. Keiskea Tamura); Anemonastrum [sect. Keiskea ] subsect. Keiskea (Tamura) Mosyakin, comb. nov .; Anemonastrum [sect. Keiskea ] subsect. Arsenjevia (Starod.) Mosyakin, comb. nov . ( Arsenjevia Starod.); and Anemonastrum [sect. Anemonastrum ] subsect. Himalayicae (Ulbr.) Mosyakin, comb. nov. ( Anemone ser. Himalayicae Ulbr.). The new nomenclatural combination Anemonastrum deltoideum (Hook.) Mosyakin, comb. nov . ( Anemone deltoidea Hook.) is validated for a North American species related to East Asian Anemonastrum keiskeanum (T. -
GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant Species Not Listed Are Considered UPL for Wetland Delineation Purposes
GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps region. -
National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt. -
Bark and Cambial Variation in the Genus Clematis (Ranunculaceae) in Taiwan
Bark and Cambial Variation in the Genus Clematis (Ranunculaceae) in Taiwan Sheng-Zehn Yang ( [email protected] ) National Pingtung University of Science and Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8648-7507 Po-Hao Chen Graduate Institute of bioresources Chien-Fan Chen Taiwan Forestry Research Institute Original Article Keywords: cogwheel-like rhytidome, ray indentation, wedge-like phloem, Ranunculaceae, vessel restriction Posted Date: October 12th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-89689/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/21 Abstract Background Studies on the anatomical characteristics of stems of Taiwanese species from the Clematis genus (Ranunculaceae) are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare cambial variation in stems of 22 Clematis species. Results The rhytidome (outer bark) was either cogwheel-like or continuous, except for in the species Clematis tashiroi. Key features of the genus were eccentric to elliptical or polygonous-lobed stems, wedge-like phloem, wedge-like rays, indentations in the axial parenchyma, and ray dilatation. The cortical sclerenchyma bers were embedded in the phloem rays with approximately 23% of the Clematis species. Both C. psilandra and C. tsugetorum had restricted vessels. There were three vascular bundle patterns, with approximately 27% of the Clematis species in Taiwan having 12 vascular bundles. The vessels dispersed throughout the stem were semi-ring-porous in most species, but were ring-porous in others. No species had diffuse-porous vessels. Only two species had a primary xylem ring located around the pith. -
The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society
Volume 28: Number 3 > Summer/Fall 2011 PalmettoThe Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Invasion of the Climbing Ferns ● Wildflowers of Tosohatchee ● Stickywilly ● Landscape Awards Part II Right: Checking the book. Photo by Vince Lamb. Hunting Wildflowers at Tosohatchee WMA Walter Kingsley Taylor The long-anticipated day had arrived. It was Thursday, May 19, and the 31st Annual Conference of the Florida Native Plant Society was a reality. The fruits of labor from all the planning, numerous meetings held, and emails exchanged would come to fruition. Field trip “G” to the Tosohatchee Wildlife Management Area (TOS) near Christmas, Orange County, Florida, was about to roll. Just a few days earlier, the new Taylor Creek Road bridge was finished and opened for traffic. This cut traveling miles for the 20 folks scheduled to come on trip “G”, and the other TOS FNPS field trip led by Katherine Bowman and Pete Dunkelberg. The weather was perfect. Fortunately, the area had recently received a needed rain and I knew the plants would be perked-up and ready to show off their colors. About a week before this gorgeous day, Karin and I motored to the TOS to survey things only to find the ground to be quite dry with many plants drooping. As we drove through the TOS main gate, there were our good friends Ray Jarrett, Sid Taylor, and Rita Grant, and a few other attendees to greet us. Ray had his boots on and was ready to go. He had directed the first vehicles to the appropriate parking area. -
Field Identification Guide to WAP Plants 2008 3Rd Ed
The Field Identification Guide to Plants Used in the Wetland Assessment Procedure (WAP) Contributors: Shirley R. Denton, Ph.D. - Biological Research Associates Diane Willis, MS – GPI Southeast, Inc. April 2008 Third Edition (2015 Printing) The Field Identification Guide was prepared by the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Additional copies can be obtained from the District at: Southwest Florida Water Management District Resource Projects Department Ecological Evaluation Section 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604 The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including access to and participation in the District’s programs and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act should contact the District’s Human Resources Bureau Chief, 2379 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 34604-6899; telephone (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4703; or email [email protected]. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1(800)955-8771 (TDD) or 1(800)955-8770 (Voice). Introduction In 1996, the Florida Legislature directed the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) to begin the process of establishing Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) throughout the District, beginning in Hillsborough, Pasco, and Pinellas counties. MFLs are defined as the flow in watercourses below which significant harm to water resources and ecology of the area would occur, and the level in surface-water bodies and aquifers in which significant harm to the water resources of the area would occur. -
UDBG: Tree Shrub Inventory January 10, 2020
UDBG: Tree Shrub Inventory January 10, 2020 Acc. Num Scientific Name LOCATION Common Name Family Common Name 15-167*1 Abelia 'Canyon Creek' TE2 Glossy Abelia Honeysuckle Family 15-167*2 Abelia 'Canyon Creek' TE2 Glossy Abelia Honeysuckle Family 15-167*3 Abelia 'Canyon Creek' TE2 Glossy Abelia Honeysuckle Family 02-2*1 Abelia x grandiflora 'Little Richard' F5 Honeysuckle Family 18-87*1 Abelia x grandiflora 'Rose Creek' TREE Rose Creek Glossy Abelia Honeysuckle Family 70-1*1 Abeliophyllum distichum C3 White Forsythia Olive Family 15-57*1 Abies balsamea var. phanerolepis NBF Pine Family 90-47*1 Abies cephalonica 'Meyer's Dwarf' C2 Meyer's Dwarf Grecian Fir Pine Family 89-4*1 Abies concolor C1 White Fir Pine Family 01-74*1 Abies firma C1 Momi Fir Pine Family 12-9*7 Abies fraseri PILL Pine Family 71-1*2 Abies koreana C1 Korean Fir Pine Family 95-26*1 Abies nordmanniana C1 Nordmann Fir Pine Family 96-21*1 Abies pinsapo C1 Spanish Fir Pine Family 14-72*1 Acer [Crimson Sunset] = 'JFS-KW202' FE Crimson Sunset hybrid maple Soapberry Family 17-100*1 Acer barbatum WR Florida Maple Soapberry Family 17-100*2 Acer barbatum WR Florida Maple Soapberry Family 88-40*1 Acer buergerianum W2 Trident Maple Soapberry Family 91-32*1 Acer buergerianum C3 Trident Maple Soapberry Family 92-78*1 Acer buergerianum A2 Trident Maple Soapberry Family 92-78*2 Acer buergerianum A2 Trident Maple Soapberry Family 18-28*1 Acer buergerianum 'Mino Yatsubusa' FH5 Mino Yatsubusa Trident Maple Soapberry Family 94-95*1 Acer campsetre 'Compactum' WV1 Dwarf Hedge Maple Soapberry Family -
Floristic Quality Assessment Report
FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.