DOCSLIB.ORG

Democracy Promotion As Foreign Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DEMOCRACY PROMOTION AS FOREIGN POLICY AS FOREIGN PROMOTION DEMOCRACY series editors JENNY EDKINS AND NICK VAUGHAN-WILLIAMS This book looks at democracy promotion as a form of foreign policy. Elliott asks why democracy was seen to be the answer to the 7/7 bombings in London, and why it should be promoted not in Britain, but in Pakistan. The book provides a detailed answer to these questions, examining the logic and the modes of thinking that made such a response possible through analysis of the stories we tell about ourselves: stories about time, history, development, civilisation and the ineluctable spread of democracy. Elliott argues that these narratives have become a key tool in enabling practices that differentiate selves from others, friends from enemies, the domestic from the foreign, civilisation from the barbarian. They operate with a particular conception of time and constitute a British, democratic, national identity by positing an “other” that is barbaric, alien, despotic, violent and backward. Such understandings are useful in the wake of disaster, because they leave us with something to do: danger can be managed by bringing certain people and places up-to-date. However, this book shows that there are other stories to be told, and that it is possible to read stories about history against the grain and author alternative, less oppressive, versions. Providing a genealogy drawing on material from colonial and postcolonial Britain and Pakistan, including legislation, political discourse, popular culture and government projects, this book will be of interest to scholars and students focusing on democracy promotion, genealogy, critical border studies, poststructural IR, postcolonial politics, discourse analysis, identity/subjectivity, and “the war on terror”. Cathy Elliott is a Senior Teaching Fellow at the School of Public Policy, University College London. She previously worked as a development manager in Pakistan. Her research interests include poststructural international relations; time, temporality and history; politics and aesthetics; and feminism and gender. Cathy Elliott DEMOCRACY PROMOTION AS FOREIGN POLICY TEMPORAL OTHERING IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS POLITICS / DEMOCRACY Cover image: © Peter Sanders ISBN 978-1-138-66972-7 The Tracks of My Tears INTERVENTIONS Muhammad Jamil, CSA, tending his small garden at Edgware Road www.routledge.com Tube Station. He was one of the first CATHY ELLIOTT people to rush down the train tunnel 9 781138 669727 on 7/7 to offer assistance. Routledge titles are available as eBook editions in a range of digital formats Democracy Promotion as Foreign Policy This book looks at democracy promotion as a form of foreign policy. Elliott asks why democracy was seen to be the answer to the 7/7 bombings in London, and why it should be promoted not in Britain, but in Pakistan. The book provides a detailed answer to these questions, examining the logic and the modes of thinking that made such a response possible through analysis of the stories we tell about ourselves: stories about time, history, development, civilisation and the ineluctable spread of democracy. Elliott argues that these narratives have become a key tool in enabling practices that differentiate selves from others, friends from enemies, the domestic from the foreign, civilisation from the barbarian. They operate with a particular conception of time and constitute a British, democratic, national identity by positing an “other” that is barbaric, alien, despotic, violent and backward. Such understandings are useful in the wake of disaster, because they leave us with something to do: danger can be managed by bringing cer- tain people and places up-to-date. However, this book shows that there are other stories to be told, and that it is possible to read stories about history against the grain, and author alternative, less oppressive versions. Providing a genealogy drawing on material from colonial and postcolonial Britain and Pakistan, including legislation, political discourse, popular culture and government projects, this book will be of interest to scholars and students focusing on democracy promotion, genealogy, critical border studies, post- structural international relations, postcolonial politics, discourse analysis, identity/subjectivity, and the “war on terror”. Cathy Elliott is a Senior Teaching Fellow at the School of Public Policy, University College London. She previously worked as a development man- ager in Pakistan. Her research interests include poststructural international relations; time, temporality and history; politics and aesthetics; and feminism and gender. Interventions Edited by: Jenny Edkins, Aberystwyth University and Nick Vaughan-Williams, University of Warwick The Series provides a forum for innovative and interdisciplinary work that engages with alternative critical, post-structural, feminist, postcolonial, psychoanalytic and cultural approaches to international relations and global politics. In our first 5 years we have published 60 volumes. We aim to advance understanding of the key areas in which scholars working within broad critical post-structural traditions have chosen to make their interventions, and to present innovative analyses of important topics. Titles in the series engage with critical thinkers in philosophy, sociology, poli- tics and other disciplines and provide situated historical, empirical and textual studies in international politics. For a full list of available titles please visit https://www.routledge.com/series/INT. The most recent titles in this series are: Refugees in Extended Exile Living on the edge Jennifer Hyndman and Wenona Giles Security Without Weapons Rethinking violence, nonviolent actions, and civilian protection M. S. Wallace Disorienting Democracy Politics of emancipation Clare Woodford Democracy Promotion as Foreign Policy Temporal othering in International Relations Cathy Elliott Asylum Seekers, Sovereignty, and the Senses of the International A politico-corporeal struggle Eeva Puumala Global Powers of Horror Security, politics, and the body in pieces François Debrix Democracy Promotion as Foreign Policy Temporal othering in international relations Cathy Elliott First published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2017 Cathy Elliott The right of Cathy Elliott to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Names: Elliott, Cathy. Title: Democracy promotion as foreign policy : temporal othering in international relations / by Cathy Elliott. Description: Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2017. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016037848| ISBN 9781138669727 (hardback) | ISBN 9781315618050 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Democratization–International cooperation. | Democracy. | international relations. Classification: LCC JC423 .E385 2017 | DDC 327.1/1–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016037848 ISBN: 978-1-138-66972-7 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-31561-805-0 (ebk) Typeset in Times New Roman by Taylor & Francis Books To my mum and dad, with love Contents List of figures viii Preface ix Introduction 1 1 What is democracy promotion? 22 2 Democratic representation 38 3 Disordering histories 55 4 Authoring the codes elsewhere: Colonial governmentality and teleological time 82 5 Blood in the codes: Liberal governmentality, democracy and Pakistan 106 6 Twelve months that shook the world: 1989 and the Salman Rushdie affair 126 7 The art of integration: Representing British Muslims 147 Conclusion: Democracy promotion, time and the “radical ordinary” 165 Bibliography 176 Index 196 Figure 2.1 Why politics will not fix Pakistan 38 Preface On Friday 13 November 2015, we tragically saw yet another co-ordinated terrorist attack in a European capital city. Gunmen and suicide bombers in Paris attacked a rock concert, a sports stadium, and various bars and restau- rants, killing 130 people and injuring many more (BBC, 2015a). A two-minute monologue by BBC TV political affairs presenter Andrew Neil condemning the attacks subsequently went viral on social media. It was later translated into French and made freely available on the BBC website in both languages (BBC, 2015b). This intervention summed up common discursive responses to such terrible events. The attackers, says Neil, are more in a long historical line of “fascists, Nazis and Stalinists” who have attacked Europe and “democ- racy” before. He proposes that France is a symbol of “civilisation” and cites as evidence a long list of distinguished French citizens. This is mainly a roll call of dead white men – including Sartre and Camus but not Simone de Beauvoir – though Juliette
Recommended publications
  • Bias at the Beeb?

    Bias at the Beeb?

    Pointmaker BIAS AT THE BEEB? A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF SLANT IN BBC ONLINE REPORTING OLIVER LATHAM SUMMARY This paper uses objective, quantitative of coverage by the BBC than is coverage in methods, based on the existing academic The Daily Telegraph. literature on media bias, to look for evidence Once we control for coverage of a think-tank of slant in the BBC’s online reporting. in The Guardian, the number of hits a think- These methods minimise the need for tank received in The Daily Telegraph has no subjective judgements of the content of the statistically significant correlation with its BBC’s news output to be made. As such, they coverage by the BBC. are less susceptible to accusations of This paper then looks at the “health partiality on the part of the author than many warnings” given to think-tanks of different previous studies. ideological persuasions when they are The paper first examines 40 think-tanks mentioned on the BBC website. which the BBC cited online between 1 June It finds that right-of-centre think-tanks are far 2010 and 31 May 2013 and compares the more likely to receive health warnings than number of citations to those of The Guardian their left-of-centre counterparts (the former and The Daily Telegraph newspapers. received health warnings between 23% and In a statistical sense, the BBC cites these 61% of the time while the latter received think-tanks “more similarly” to that of The them between 0% and 12% of the time). Guardian than that of The Daily Telegraph.
  • The Theoretical Significance of Foreign Policy in International Relations- an Analyses

    The Theoretical Significance of Foreign Policy in International Relations- an Analyses

    Journal of Critical Reviews ISSN- 2394-5125 Vol 7, Issue 2, 2020 Review Article THE THEORETICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FOREIGN POLICY IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS- AN ANALYSES Jesmine Ahmed* *PhD Scholar, Department of Political Science, Assam University, Email Id-jesmine, [email protected]. Received: 09.11.2019 Revised: 05.12.2019 Accepted: 04.01.2020 Abstract: Foreign policy of a country is formulated to safeguard and promote its national interests in the conduct of relations with other countries, bilaterally and multilaterally. It is a direct reflection of a country’s traditional values and overall national policies, her aspirations and self-perception. Thus, Foreign Policies are the strategies, methods, guidelines, agreements that usually national governments use to perform their actions in the international arena. In contemporary times, every state establishes diplomatic, economic, trade, educational, cultural and political relations with other nations and that compels to maintain its relation with each other as well as with international organizations and non-governmental actors in the international relations. Thus, International Relations attempts to explain the behaviours that occur across the boundaries of states and institutions such as private, state, governmental, non-governmental and inter- governmental oversee those interactions. However, this paper try to articulate the theoretical importance of foreign policy in international relations and how it helps in maintaining relations among the countries at the international level. Key Words: Foreign Policy, International Relations, State, Bilateral, Multilateral © 2019 by Advance Scientific Research. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.02.144 INTRODUCTION: Moreover, Foreign policy involves both decisions and actions i.e., In international arena, every nation has always been policies.
  • The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It

    The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It

    September 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE JAMES DOBBINS, GABRIELLE TARINI, ALI WYNE The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It n the aftermath of World War II, the United States accepted the mantle of global leadership and worked to build a new global order based on the principles of nonaggression and open, nondiscriminatory trade. An early pillar of this new Iorder was the Marshall Plan for European reconstruction, which British histo- rian Norman Davies has called “an act of the most enlightened self-interest in his- tory.”1 America’s leaders didn’t regard this as charity. They recognized that a more peaceful and more prosperous world would be in America’s self-interest. American willingness to shoulder the burdens of world leadership survived a costly stalemate in the Korean War and a still more costly defeat in Vietnam. It even survived the end of the Cold War, the original impetus for America’s global activ- ism. But as a new century progressed, this support weakened, America’s influence slowly diminished, and eventually even the desire to exert global leadership waned. Over the past two decades, the United States experienced a dramatic drop-off in international achievement. A generation of Americans have come of age in an era in which foreign policy setbacks have been more frequent than advances. C O R P O R A T I O N Awareness of America’s declining influence became immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic and by Obama commonplace among observers during the Barack Obama with Ebola, has also been widely noted.
  • Foreign Policy Roles of the President and Congress

    Foreign Policy Roles of the President and Congress

    Order Code RL30193 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Foreign Policy Roles of the President and Congress June 1, 1999 (name redacted) Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress ABSTRACT The United States Constitution divides foreign policy powers between the President and the Congress so that both share in the making of foreign policy. The executive and legislative branches each play important roles that are different but that often overlap. Both branches have continuing opportunities to initiate and change foreign policy, and the interaction between them continues indefinitely throughout the life of a policy. This report reviews and illustrates 12 basic ways that the United States can make foreign policy. The practices illustrated in this report indicate that making foreign policy is a complex process, and that the support of both branches is required for a strong and effective U.S. foreign policy. For a detailed discussion of how war-making powers are shared, see War Powers Resolution: Presidential Compliance. CRS Issue Brief 81050. This report will be updated only as events warrant. Foreign Policy Roles of the President and Congress Summary The United States Constitution divides the foreign policy powers between the President and Congress so that both share in the making of foreign policy. The executive and legislative branches each play important roles that are different but that often overlap. Both branches have continuing opportunities to initiate and change foreign policy, and the interaction between them continues indefinitely throughout the life of a policy. This report identifies and illustrates 12 basic ways to make U.S.
  • Sovereignty Foreign Policy; Washington; Jan/Feb 2001; Stephen D Krasner;

    Sovereignty Foreign Policy; Washington; Jan/Feb 2001; Stephen D Krasner;

    Sovereignty Foreign Policy; Washington; Jan/Feb 2001; Stephen D Krasner; Issue: 122 Start Page: 20-29 ISSN: 00157228 Subject Terms: Globalization Sovereignty Classification Codes: 9180: International 1210: Politics & political behavior Abstract: Sovereignty was never quite as vibrant as many contemporary observers suggest. The conventional norms of sovereignty have always been challenged. A few states, most notably the US, have had autonomy, control, and recognition for most of their existence, but most others have not. Even for weaker states sovereignty remains attractive. Although sovereignty might provide little more than international recognition, that recognition guarantees access to international organizations and sometimes to international finance. In various parts of the world, national borders still represent the fault lines of conflict. The most important impact of economic globalization and transnational norms will be to alter the scope of state authority rather than to generate some fundamentally new way to organize political life. Full Text: Copyright Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Jan/Feb 2001 [Headnote] THINK AGAIN [Headnote] The idea of states as autonomous, independent entities is collapsing under the combined onslaught of monetary unions, CNN, the Internet, and nongovernmental organizations. But those who proclaim the death of sovereignty misread history. The nation -state has a keen instinct for survival and has so far adapted to new challenges -even the challenge of globalization. The Sovereign State Is Just About Dead Very wong. Sovereignty was never quite as vibrant as many contemporary observers suggest. The conventional norms of sovereignty have always been challenged. A few states, most notably the United States, have had autonomy, control, and recognition for most of their existence, but most others have not.
  • Gubernatorial Foreign Policy

    Gubernatorial Foreign Policy

    JULIAN G. KU Gubernatorial Foreign Policy A B S T R A C T. In a variety of circumstances, state governors exercise independent decision- making power over matters affecting the foreign policy of the United States. This Essay describes and defends this emerging system of gubernatorial foreign policy on both legal and functional grounds. Recent Supreme Court decisions retreating from federal exclusivity in foreign affairs and prohibiting the commandeering of state executive officials leave a small doctrinal space for governors to act independently on matters affecting foreign policy. This small space has been further expanded by the federal government's practice of imposing limitations on the preemptive effect of treaties and international agreements. A system of gubernatorial foreign policy also represents the most practical and feasible way to accommodate the internationalizing pressure of globalization with a continuing federal system of "dual sovereignties." Under this system, the states will continue to improve their capacity to deal with matters affecting foreign affairs, and the federal government will retain the right to preempt, but not to commandeer, state governors in the service of federal foreign policy goals. A U T H O R. Associate Professor of Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Visiting Associate Professor of Law, William & Mary School of Law. I would like to thank John Parry, Michael Ramsey, James Tierney, and Timothy Zick for helpful comments, Jacob Djaboury for research assistance, and Patricia Kasting for library assistance. An earlier version of this Essay was presented at a faculty workshop at Lewis & Clark Law School. Hofstra University School of Law provided support for this Essay.
  • A Reflection on the Work of Stanley Hauerwas

    A Reflection on the Work of Stanley Hauerwas

    10_CARTER_CORRECTED (DO NOT DELETE) 11/19/2012 4:01 PM MUST LIBERALISM BE VIOLENT? A REFLECTION ON THE WORK OF STANLEY HAUERWAS STEPHEN L. CARTER* I INTRODUCTION My subject is the work of the theologian Stanley Hauerwas on violence and coercion. I shall argue that his views on the violence of war and his views on the violence of the liberal state are inextricably linked, and that the critique of liberalism that emerges from his thought actually does have—contrary to his own view—important implications for public policy. In order to appreciate his thinking on these matters, one must appreciate his starting point, which is not the starting point of the standard academic analysis—that is, he does not begin with liberalism. He begins (and he would say, ends) with Christianity. Not Christianity in the sense of Christendom but Christianity in the sense of church—the place to which Christians are called and through which their lives are constituted. And although Hauerwas certainly has some interest in what commands bind believers in general and Christians in particular (a point to which I will presently come), his larger concern is the creation and nurturing of people who believe that commands bind them—that people are in the first instance bundles not of rights and preferences (as liberalism would have it) but of duties. These duties, moreover, are not owed to each other, or to ideology or party, or to government or future generations or Mother Earth; they are owed to God. The notion that we are created by God, and owe duties first to God, is crucial to the conceptions of church and of society that motivate his work.
  • PBIFF 2012 Film Announcement-1

    PBIFF 2012 Film Announcement-1

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE National Press Contact: March 13, 2012 Carol Marshall Carol Marshall Public Relations, Inc. 818/760‐6450 [email protected] Local Press Contact: Profile Marketing & PR Joanne Polin [email protected] 561‐350‐8784 Hillary Reynolds [email protected] 954‐815‐1186 17th PALM BEACH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL UNVEILS 2012 LINE‐UP * * * “ROBOT & FRANK” OPENS FESTIVAL THURSDAY, APRIL 12; CLOSES WITH “SASSY PANTS” * * * Festival Presents 40 World and U.S. Premiere Feature Films BOCA RATON, FL – The Palm Beach International Film Festival (PBIFF) announced its highly anticipated film line‐up for the 17th edition, April 12‐19, 2012, featuring 25 World Premieres, 14 U.S. Premieres and 2 North American Premieres. PBIFF (www.pbifilmfest.org) will present features, documentaries and short films from the U.S. and around the world, including Netherlands, Spain, Argentina, Tanzania, Italy, France, England, Israel, Thailand, Guinea‐Bissau, Portugal, Australia, Canada, Romania and Sweden, and will play host to filmmakers, producers, and actors to represent and discuss their films. “We are excited about this year’s program,” comments PBIFF Director Randi Emerman, “which reflects our ongoing mission to engage with the community, expanding and enhancing its knowledge of the world through the unique lens of independent film.† We encourage people to take this opportunity to enjoy these diversely international stories.ʺ Opening Night kicks off with Robot & Frank, directed by Jake Schreier. Set in the near future, Frank, a retired cat burglar, has two grown kids who are concerned he can no longer live alone.† They are tempted to place him in a nursing home until Frankʹs son chooses a different option: against the old manʹs wishes, he buys Frank a walking, talking humanoid robot programmed to improve his physical and mental health.
  • 11 October 2019 Page 1 of 15 SATURDAY 05 OCTOBER 2019 Fans Helps Explain the Current State of Politics

    11 October 2019 Page 1 of 15 SATURDAY 05 OCTOBER 2019 Fans Helps Explain the Current State of Politics

    Radio 4 Listings for 5 – 11 October 2019 Page 1 of 15 SATURDAY 05 OCTOBER 2019 fans helps explain the current state of politics. Editor: Eleanor Garland SAT 00:00 Midnight News (m0008y9h) Penny is an academic and a serial fan - covering everything National and international news from BBC Radio 4 from David Bowie to Ed Balls. And in this energetic and witty SAT 10:30 The Kitchen Cabinet (m00092tc) talk Penny argues that many of the characteristics of fandom Series 26 elsewhere - a rich interest, a wish to protect the sanctity of the SAT 00:30 Margaret Thatcher: Herself Alone (m0008y7r) fandom, and a refusal to tolerate criticism - also mark politics Isle of Wight Episode 5 and political fans, whatever side they're on. And that understanding politics in this way may help us understand it Jay Rayner and his panel are on the Isle of Wight. Polly Russell, How did Margaret Thatcher both change and divide Britain? better. Tim Hayward, Paula McIntyre and Tim Anderson answer the How did her model of combative female leadership help shape culinary questions from the audience. the way we live now? How did the woman who won the Cold Producer: Giles Edwards War and three general elections in succession find herself This week the panellists offer ideas for blackberries, suggest a pushed out by her own MPs? foolproof way to flip an omelette and discuss cheese soufflé. SAT 06:00 News and Papers (m00092t1) Charles Moore’s full account, based on unique access to The latest news headlines. Including the weather and a look at David Redup of Grace's bakery joins the panel with Bird's Margaret Thatcher herself, her papers, and her closest the papers.
  • New Approaches to Understanding the Role and Effect of UK Party Leaders in General Elections

    New Approaches to Understanding the Role and Effect of UK Party Leaders in General Elections

    How leaders matter: new approaches to understanding the role and effect of UK party leaders in general elections Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Peter Andersen. October 2020 Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ 5 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 1 : Introduction ........................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 : Reviewing the Literature on Leaders: Evaluations, Elections and Effects ........... 23 Chapter 3 : Research Design, Methods and Approach ........................................................... 59 Chapter 4 : Fluid or Stable? Leadership Evaluations During a Turbulent Period of British Politics (2014-17) ................................................................................................................... 85 Chapter 5 : Party Leaders and Campaigns: Masters of Persuasion? .................................... 126 Chapter 6 : From Footnotes to Headliners:
  • Title from Liberal Multiculturalism to Muscular Liberalism : Changes in The

    Title from Liberal Multiculturalism to Muscular Liberalism : Changes in The

    Title From liberal multiculturalism to muscular liberalism : changes in the official discourses of multiculturalism in Australia Sub Title Author 塩原, 良和(Shiobara, Yoshikazu) Publisher 慶應義塾大学法学研究会 Publication year 2020 Jtitle 法學研究 : 法律・政治・社会 (Journal of law, politics, and sociology). Vol.93, No.12 (2020. 12) ,p.394 (43)- 416 (21) Abstract Notes 大石裕教授退職記念号 Genre Journal Article URL https://koara.lib.keio.ac.jp/xoonips/modules/xoonips/detail.php?koara_id=AN00224504-2020122 8-0394 慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)に掲載されているコンテンツの著作権は、それぞれの著作者、学会または出版社/発行者に帰属し、その権利は著作権法によって 保護されています。引用にあたっては、著作権法を遵守してご利用ください。 The copyrights of content available on the KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources (KOARA) belong to the respective authors, academic societies, or publishers/issuers, and these rights are protected by the Japanese Copyright Act. When quoting the content, please follow the Japanese copyright act. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 法学研究 93 巻 12 号（2020：12） From Liberal Multiculturalism to Muscular Liberalism: Changes in the Ofcial Discourses of Multiculturalism in Australia1） SHIOBARA, Yoshikazu Introduction Liberal Values: Alternating between “Sharing” and “Coercion” The Discursive Formation of Ofcial Multiculturalism Changes in the Ofcial Discourses of Multiculturalism after 2000 Neoliberalism in Muscular Liberal Multiculturalism Conclusion: Moving toward a “Multiculturalism of Associations” Introduction While multiculturalism is broadly defined as a variety of principles, movements and policies that recognize the existence of culturally diverse people in a national society, and seek a fair society where they can all live together (Shiobara 2012), understanding the concept and implications of multiculturalism has been a controversial topic of academic and political debates in many countries. In the early 2010s, European political leaders such as David Cameron, Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarközy proclaimed the “failure” of multiculturalism.
  • In Search of Common Values Amid Large-Scale Immigrant Integration Pressures

    In Search of Common Values Amid Large-Scale Immigrant Integration Pressures

    In Search of Common Values amid Large-Scale Immigrant Integration Pressures Integration Futures Working Group By Natalia Banulescu-Bogdan and Meghan Benton MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE EUROPE In Search of Common Values amid Large-Scale Immigrant Integration Pressures By Natalia Banulescu-Bogdan and Meghan Benton June 2017 Integration Futures Working Group ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was commissioned for a meeting of the Integration Futures Working Group held in Vienna in January 2017. The theme of the meeting was ‘Debating Values: Immigrant Integration in a Time of Social Change’, and this report was among those that in- formed the working group’s discussions. The authors are grateful for the feedback they received from the working group, as well as to Aliyyah Ahad for research assistance and to Elizabeth Collett and Lauren Shaw for their helpful edits and suggestions. The Integration Futures Working Group is a Migration Policy Institute Europe initiative that brings together senior policymakers, experts, civil-society officials, and private-sector leaders to stimulate new thinking on integration policy. It is supported by the Robert Bosch Foundation. For more on the Integration Futures Working Group, visit: www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/integration-futures-working-group. © 2017 Migration Policy Institute Europe. All Rights Reserved. Cover Design: April Siruno, MPI Typesetting: Liz Heimann, MPI No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Migration Policy Institute. A full-text PDF of this document is avail- able for free download from www.migrationpolicy.org.