DOCSLIB.ORG

Different Types of Glomerulopathic Light Chains Interact with Mesangial Cells Using a Common Receptor but Exhibit Different Intracellular Trafficking Patterns

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Different Types of Glomerulopathic Light Chains Interact with Mesangial Cells Using a Common Receptor but Exhibit Different Intracellular Trafficking Patterns Laboratory Investigation (2004) 84, 440–451 & 2004 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0023-6837/04 $25.00 www.laboratoryinvestigation.org Different types of glomerulopathic light chains interact with mesangial cells using a common receptor but exhibit different intracellular trafficking patterns Jiamin Teng1, William J. Russell1, Xin Gu1, James Cardelli2, M Lamar Jones1 and Guillermo A. Herrera1,3,4 1Department of Pathology; 2Department of Microbiology; 3Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy and 4Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA Patients with plasma cell dyscrasias may have circulating light chains (LCs), some of which are nephrotoxic. Nephrotoxic LCs can affect the various renal compartments. Some of these LCs may produce predominantly proximal tubular damage, while others are associated with distal nephron obstruction (the so-called ‘myeloma kidney’). Both these are considered tubulopathic (T) LCs. A receptor has been found in proximal tubular cells (cubilin/megalin complex), which mediates the absorption of LCs and is involved in the pathogenesis of tubulopathies that occurs in these patients. Another group of nephrotoxic LCs is associated with glomerular damage and these are considered as glomerulopathic (G). These patients with G-LCs may develop AL- amyloidosis (AL-Am) or LC deposition disease (LCDD). Recent evidence indicates that the physicochemical characteristics (amino-acid composition and conformation of the variable region) of a given nephrotoxic LC may be the most significant factor in determining the type and location of renal damage within the nephron. Other factors may also be involved, including yet uncharacterized host factors that may include genetic polymorphism, among others. Interestingly, the amount of LC production by the clone of plasma cells does not correlate directly with the severity of the renal alterations. Understanding the nature of the interactions between G-LCs and mesangial cells (MCs) is crucial to define key steps that may be targeted for therapeutic purposes. Experimental studies have delineated important aspects pertaining to interactions between G-LCs and MCs, indicating that these interactions are receptor mediated. The data presented in the current study support a single receptor present on MCs for both LCDD and AL-LCs, as clearly demonstrated with competition and colocalization immunofluorescence (IF) studies. This receptor resides in caveolae present on the plasma membrane of HMCs and is overexpressed when HMCs are incubated with G-LCs but not TLCs. Caveolae play a fundamental role in receptor-mediated endocytosis, a crucial process in the internalization of AL-LCs and amyloidogenesis. LC internalization is clathrin mediated. The data also indicate that intracellular trafficking in MCs is different for AL-LCs and LCDD-LCs. AL-LCs are delivered to the mature lysosomal compartment where amyloid formation occurs. LCDD-LCs alter mesangial function and phenotype by interacting with the MC surface membranes through similar receptors as the AL-LCs. The data also demonstrated that cubilin and megalin were absent on MCs, so the receptor involved is different from the one already characterized in the proximal tubules. Laboratory Investigation (2004) 84, 440–451, advance online publication, 1 March 2004; doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700069 Keywords: myeloma; light chains; plasma cell dyscrasia; mesangial cells; light-chain deposition disease; AL-amyloidosis; receptor While the majority of the nephrotoxic light chains 30% are primarily associated with glomerular (LCs) produce tubular damage, approximately pathology. Binding data relating to the tubular receptor for LCs have suggested that cubilin first binds to megalin on cell membranes, where Correspondence: GA Herrera, Department of Pathology, Louisiana the cubilin–megalin complex is internalized State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, simultaneously for endosomal trafficking in Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA. the proximal tubules.1 The pathogenic effects of E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 June 2003; accepted 05 November 2003; published glomerulopathic (G)-LCs are centered in the online 1 March 2004 mesangium. Trafficking of light chains in mesangial cells J Teng et al 441 G-LCs alter mesangial homeostasis. Their effects proven by renal biopsy. The LCs were obtained and on mesangial cells (MCs) are variable depending on purified from the urine of these patients using the biochemical composition of the variable region ammonium sulfate precipitation and ion exchange of the LCs resulting in two well-characterized chromatography, as described previously.6 disease processes: Al-amyloidosis (AL-Am) and LC Briefly, affinity chromatography consisted of depostion disease (LCDD).2–4 The LCs obtained from passing urine over sepharose CL-4B columns to the urine of patients with these disorders are which either goat anti-human l or k antibodies have referred as AL and LCDD-LCs, respectively. Nephro- been conjugated. Free plus bound l or k LCs were toxic LCs may either affect both the tubular inter- eluted from the columns with 0.1 glycine, pH 2.2. stitial and glomerular compartments in a given case The purity of the LC was checked on immunodiffu- or may restrict their damage to one compartment, or sion plates and anti-IgG and anti-IgA affinity the two glomerulopathies may coexist. As such, columns were used to remove contaminating IgG some LCs may elicit their pathologic effects produ- and IgA. When purified, the LC migrated as a single cing a combination of lesions (ie proximal tubular band when resolved by zone electrophoresis on damage and distal nephron obstruction in the agarose gels using a 50 mM barbital buffer, pH 8.6, tubular interstitial compartment or LCDD and AL- and consisted entirely of either free l or k LC as Am in the glomerular compartment). The majority of determined by immunofixation. Purified LCs were the nephrotoxic LCs, however, produce a specific concentrated, dialyzed against 0.9 NaCl, filtered pattern of renal damage confined to one renal through a 0.2-m membrane and stored aseptically at compartment and restricted to a specific lesion. 1 mg/ml at 41C. The extracted LCs had the same Vascular alterations also occur in a significant composition as those circulating in the serum of the number of cases associated with AL-Am and in corresponding patients. some cases with LCDD. The present paper focuses on the interactions between G-LCs and MCs and how these produce Human Mesangial Cell (HMC) Culture pathologic alterations. The study aimed at elucidat- HMCs were cultured following the standard method ing whether a specific receptor was shared by all described by Harper et al.7 Briefly, the cortex of G-LCs or more than one receptor was involved, leading surgically removed human kidneys was separated to AL-Am and LCDD. Immunogold labeling studies and glomerular MCs were isolated by sieving the at the ultrastructural level, coimmunolocalization cortex through stainless-steel screens and a series of using IF, binding competition and crosslinking different pore size nylon sieves. The cells were studies demonstrated the presence of a single plated for culture in RPMI 1640 containing 20% receptor for both types of G-LCs. This receptor must fetal calf serum and penicillin, streptomycin and act differently when involved in LC–MC interac- fungizone. For some experiments, the HMCs were tions associated with AL-Am and LCDD, as the final grown on coverslips placed on 20 mm culture plates. result of the pathogenetic effects is entirely differ- Ultrastructural examination and immunocyto- ent. In the case of AL-LCs, endocytosis is a crucial chemistry staining with immunoreactivity for muscle- step in the formation of amyloid and resultant specific antigen (HHF-35 antigen) and vimentin and pathologic changes leading to mesangial matrix lack of staining for keratin and factor VIII were used degradation and replacement of normal matrix by to determine that these cells were a homogeneous amyloid fibrils. In contrast, in LCDD-LC interactions population of HMCs. Passage 5–6 HMCs, but not with MCs, internalization is not an important initial older, were grown on RPMI 1640 medium contain- process and the alterations in mesangial home- ing 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS) until confluent. ostasis dictated by the G-LCs appear to occur Once confluent, HMCs were cultured in low serum primarily at the MC surface.5 The receptor modulat- (0.5% FBS) RPMI 1640 medium for 48 h to render ing and regulating LC–MC interactions is different the cells quiescent prior to the experiments. from the receptor identified for LCs in the proximal tubular cells. The main objectives of the work reported in this paper are to confirm the existence Immunofluorescence (IF) of such receptor-mediating G-LC-MC pathologic events and to define whether AL and LCDD-LCs HMCs grown on coverslips incubated with one or exhibit similar or different intracellular trafficking two different G-LCs at the same time (LCDD and AL- pathways in MCs. Further studies to characterize LCs) and T-LCs were fluorescence tagged for k and this receptor fully are currently being conducted. or l LCs in order to label the various LCs and caveolin-1 to determine whether the G-LCs coloca- lized to the same surface MC areas and whether Materials and methods there was any attraction for the TLC to the MCs Protein purification membranes or competition with the G-LCs. A direct immunofluorescence stain procedure was per- G-LCs were purified from the urine of patients who formed.8 A polyclonal antibody to caveolin-1 (Santa had AL-Am, LCDD and myeloma cast nephropathy Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) was used Laboratory Investigation (2004) 84, 440–451 Trafficking of light chains in mesangial cells J Teng et al 442 at a dilution of 1/50 and those to k and l at a dilution to the slides for 1 min, rinsed with distilled water, of 1/200. LCs were labeled with either fluorescein, two changes and placed in Dako automation buffer rhodamine or Texas red.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perspectives on in Vitro Diagnostic Devices, Regulated by the Office Of
    1 2 “This transcript appears as received from the commercial transcribing service after inclusion of minor corrections to typographical and factual errors recommended by the Technical Point of Contact.” 1 PERSPECTIVES ON IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES, 2 REGULATED BY THE OFFICE OF BLOOD RESEARCH AND REVIEW 3 4 FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION 5 WHITE OAK CAMPUS 6 BUILDING 31 7 10903 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE 8 SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND 20903 9 10 TUESDAY, JULY 16, 2019 11 8:30 A.M. 12 13 APPEARANCES: 14 MODERATOR: TERESITA C. MERCADO, MS 15 16 WELCOME: 17 JULIA LATHROP, PHD, DETTD/OBRR 18 19 INTRODUCTION: 20 WENDY PAUL, MD, DBCD/OBRR 21 22 PRESENTERS: 23 KIMBERLY BIGLER, MLS(ASCP)CMSBB, DBCD/OBRR 1 ANNETTE RAGOSTA, MT(ASCP)SBB, DBCD/OBRR 2 ZHUGONG "JASON" LIU, PHD, DRB/DBCD 3 4 CONFERENCE 5 TUESDAY, JULY 16, 2019 6 8:30 A.M. 7 DR. LATHROP: Okay, everybody. Thank you for coming to the second day of 8 our workshop which is going to be focused on considerations for IVDs regulated by the Division 9 of Blood Components and Devices in OBRR. 10 Again, the slides will be available on the website in about two weeks, so take a 11 look for them there. And moderating today’s session is Teresita Mercado from the Division. 12 MS. MERCADO: Good morning. Welcome to session three of the IVD 13 workshop. Our first speaker will be Dr. Wendy Paul. She is the deputy director of DBCD who 14 will give us an introduction to devices in DBCD. 15 DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoclonal Antibodies As Tools to Combat Fungal Infections
    Journal of Fungi Review Monoclonal Antibodies as Tools to Combat Fungal Infections Sebastian Ulrich and Frank Ebel * Institute for Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, D-80539 Munich, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 November 2019; Accepted: 31 January 2020; Published: 4 February 2020 Abstract: Antibodies represent an important element in the adaptive immune response and a major tool to eliminate microbial pathogens. For many bacterial and viral infections, efficient vaccines exist, but not for fungal pathogens. For a long time, antibodies have been assumed to be of minor importance for a successful clearance of fungal infections; however this perception has been challenged by a large number of studies over the last three decades. In this review, we focus on the potential therapeutic and prophylactic use of monoclonal antibodies. Since systemic mycoses normally occur in severely immunocompromised patients, a passive immunization using monoclonal antibodies is a promising approach to directly attack the fungal pathogen and/or to activate and strengthen the residual antifungal immune response in these patients. Keywords: monoclonal antibodies; invasive fungal infections; therapy; prophylaxis; opsonization 1. Introduction Fungal pathogens represent a major threat for immunocompromised individuals [1]. Mortality rates associated with deep mycoses are generally high, reflecting shortcomings in diagnostics as well as limited and often insufficient treatment options. Apart from the development of novel antifungal agents, it is a promising approach to activate antimicrobial mechanisms employed by the immune system to eliminate microbial intruders. Antibodies represent a major tool to mark and combat microbes. Moreover, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are highly specific reagents that opened new avenues for the treatment of cancer and other diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation of High Affinity Anti-Peptide Polyclonal Antibodies
    molecules Article Generation of High Affinity Anti-Peptide Polyclonal Antibodies Recognizing Goat αs1-Casein Aliah Zannierah Mohsin 1 , Rashidah Sukor 1,2,* , Jinap Selamat 1,2 , Anis Shobirin Meor Hussin 2, Intan Hakimah Ismail 3, Nuzul Noorahya Jambari 1,2 and Farina Mustaffa-Kamal 4 1 Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; [email protected] (A.Z.M.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (N.N.J.) 2 Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +603-9769-8254 Academic Editor: Paolo Iadarola Received: 18 April 2020; Accepted: 5 May 2020; Published: 5 June 2020 Abstract: The chemical, technological and allergy properties of goat’s milk are significantly affected by the level of αs1-casein. Detection and quantification of αs1-casein requires high-specificity methods to overcome high-sequence similarity between this protein and others in the casein family. Unavailability of antibodies with high affinity and specificity towards goat αs1-casein hinders the development of immuno-based analytical methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and biosensors. Here, we report the generation of polyclonal antibodies (or immunoglobulins, IgGs) raised towards goat αs1-casein N- (Nter) and C-terminal (Cter) peptide sequences. The Nter and Cter peptides of goat αs1-casein were immunized in rabbits for the generation of antisera, which were purified using protein G affinity chromatography.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoclonal Antibodies Vs Polyclonal Antibodies
    ARP American Research Products Inc http://blog.arp1.com Monoclonal Antibodies vs Polyclonal Antibodies Author : Dan Souw Monoclonal Antibodies vs Polyclonal Antibodies: what are the differences and how they will affect your experiments Monoclonal antibodies vs Polyclonal antibodies: The different production processes Both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies share a huge number of applications, such as IHC and WB, in common. However, the very nature of how they are produced can often make one more suitable for a given application over another. So what are the difference in their production? And how does this affect their various features? The Polyclonal Antibody Production Process In nature, the primary immune response to a foreign antigen involves the activation of large numbers of B-cells to protect the body. Each B-cell targets a single antigen, and produces antibodies against a specific epitope of that antigen. The result is the production large numbers of antibodies, each with different specificities and epitope affinities, known as ‘polyclonal antibodies’. Polyclonal antibodies can be raised in many different species, such as goats, sheep, or rabbits. To do this, the animals are typically immunized with a specific antigen to elicit an immune response. This is usually followed by further immunizations to boost the levels of circulating antibodies – the titer. Following this, the serum containing the desired antibodies is collected. This is then typically enriched using affinity purification. This process – multiple immunizations followed by affinity purification – ultimately lends itself to the production of high titer, high-affinity polyclonal antibodies against the antigen of interest. The Monoclonal Antibody Production Process Monoclonal antibodies are created with a single B-cell clone from one animal, generating 1 / 4 ARP American Research Products Inc http://blog.arp1.com antibodies to a single specific epitope.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies for Sensitive Detection of Pro-Inflammatory Protein S100A9
    applied sciences Communication Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies for Sensitive Detection of Pro-Inflammatory Protein S100A9 Eun-Jung Kim 1, Gyu-Min Im 2, Chang-Soo Lee 3, Yun-Gon Kim 4, Byoung Joon Ko 5, Hee-Jin Jeong 6,* and Byung-Gee Kim 1,2,* 1 Bio-MAX/N-Bio, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] 2 Interdisciplinary Program for Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea; [email protected] 4 Department of Chemical Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Korea; [email protected] 5 School of Biopharmaceutical and Medical Sciences, Sungshin Women’s University, Seoul 02844, Korea; [email protected] 6 Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Hongik University, Sejong 30016, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.-J.J.); [email protected] (B.-G.K.) Abstract: The calcium-binding protein S100A9 regulates inflammatory processes and the immune response. It is overexpressed in a variety of inflammatory and oncologic conditions. In this study, we produced a recombinant human S100A9 (hS100A9) antigen with high yield and purity and used it to generate a hybridoma cell culture-based monoclonal anti-hS100A9 antibody. We selected five anti-hS100A9 antibodies from cell supernatants that showed high antigen binding efficiency and identified the nucleotide sequences of three antibodies: two with high effective concentration values and one with the lowest value. The antigen and antibody development procedures described herein Citation: Kim, E.-J.; Im, G.-M.; Lee, are useful for producing large amounts of monoclonal antibodies against hS100A9 and other antigens C.-S.; Kim, Y.-G.; Ko, B.J.; Jeong, H.-J.; of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Vaccinations What Is Vaccination?
    Chapter 18: Applications of Immunology 1. Vaccinations 2. Monoclonal vs Polyclonal Ab 3. Diagnostic Immunology 1. Vaccinations What is Vaccination? A method of inducing artificial immunity by exposing the individual to some portion or form of the pathogen (aka “immunization”): • triggers an adaptive immune response resulting in the production of memory T and B cells specific for antigens from the pathogen • a secondary exposure will result in a potent and immediate immune response to the specific pathogen due to the memory cells **the vaccination itself should NOT cause an infection** 1 Different Types of Vaccines 1) Attenuated whole agent vaccines: • live but “weakened” pathogen • genetically modified • mutant or less virulent strains of the pathogen 2) Inactivated whole agent vaccines: • pathogen that has been killed in some way • usually by chemical treatment, also by heat **whole agents are generally more effective due to containing multiple antigens, but also carry more risk of infection** 3) Toxoid vaccines: • chemically inactivated protein exotoxins • inactivated toxins are referred to as toxoids 4) Subunit vaccines: • a specific protein or protein fragment from pathogen • purified from pathogen directly OR • produced as a recombinant vaccine in other organism 5) Conjugated vaccines: • small or non-protein antigens attached to a “carrier” • necessary to enhance immune response **these “molecular vaccines” tend to be less effective however they are safer than whole agents** Haptens & Conjugated Antigens • some molecules (haptens) are too small to induce an IR • cannot be processed and presented on MHC class II • others (e.g. polysaccharides) are not very immunogenic • in either case, conjugation to a protein carrier is nec.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibody Production
    Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines on: antibody production This document, the CCAC guidelines on: antibody production, has been developed by the ad hoc subcommittee on immunological procedures of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) Guidelines Committee: Dr Albert Clark, Queen's University (Chair) Dr Dean Befus, University of Alberta (Canadian Society for Immunology representative) Dr Pamela O'Hashi, University of Toronto Dr Fred Hart, Aventis Pasteur Dr Michael Schunk, Aventis Pasteur Dr Andrew Fletch, McMaster University Dr Gilly Griffin, Canadian Council on Animal Care In addition, the CCAC is grateful to the many individuals, organizations and associations that pro- vided comments on earlier drafts of this guidelines' document. In particular thanks are extended to: the Canadian Society of Immunology; the Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Science and the Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Medicine; Dr Terry Pearson, University of Victoria; Dr Mavanur Suresh, University of Alberta; Drs Ernest Olfert and Barry Ziola, University of Saskatchewan; and Dr Patricia Shewen, University of Guelph. © Canadian Council on Animal Care, 2002 ISBN: 0-919087-37-X Canadian Council on Animal Care 315-350 Albert Street Ottawa ON CANADA K1R 1B1 http://www.ccac.ca CCAC guidelines on: antibody production, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. PREFACE . .1 E. REFERENCES . .20 B. INTRODUCTION . .2 1. General . .20 2. Polyclonal Antibody Production . .21 C. POLYCLONAL ANTIBODY PRODUCTION 3 3. Monoclonal Antibody Production . .25 3.1 Other useful references . .27 1. Animal Selection and Care . .3 3.2 Additional useful information . .27 2. Immunization Protocol . .6 3. Standard Operating Procedures . .6 F. GLOSSARY . .27 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Immune System
    CAMPBELL BIOLOGY IN FOCUS URRY • CAIN • WASSERMAN • MINORSKY • REECE 35 The Immune System Lecture Presentations by Kathleen Fitzpatrick and Nicole Tunbridge, Simon Fraser University © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. SECOND EDITION Overview: Recognition and Response . Pathogens, agents that cause disease, infect a wide range of animals, including humans . The immune system enables an animal to avoid or limit many infections . All animals have innate immunity, a defense that is active immediately upon infection . Vertebrates also have adaptive immunity © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 35.1 © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. Innate immunity includes barrier defenses . A small set of receptor proteins bind molecules or structures common to viruses, bacteria, or other microbes . Binding an innate immune receptor activates internal defensive responses to a broad range of pathogens © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. Adaptive immunity, or acquired immunity, develops after exposure to agents such as microbes, toxins, or other foreign substances . It involves a very specific response to pathogens © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 35.2 Pathogens (such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses) INNATE IMMUNITY Barrier defenses: (all animals) Skin • Recognition of traits shared Mucous membranes by broad ranges of Secretions pathogens, using a small set of receptors Internal defenses: Phagocytic cells • Rapid response Natural killer cells Antimicrobial proteins Inflammatory response ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY Humoral response: (vertebrates only) Antibodies defend against • Recognition of traits infection in body fluids. specific to particular pathogens, using a vast Cell-mediated response: array of receptors Cytotoxic cells defend against infection in body cells. • Slower response © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. Concept 35.1: In innate immunity, recognition and response rely on traits common to groups of pathogens .
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Immune Response to Posthodiplostomum Minimum Infection in Bluegills
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications Summer 2020 Assessment of the Immune Response to Posthodiplostomum minimum Infection in Bluegills Olamide S. Olayinka Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses Part of the Immunity Commons, Immunology of Infectious Disease Commons, and the Parasitology Commons Recommended Citation Olayinka, Olamide S., "Assessment of the Immune Response to Posthodiplostomum minimum Infection in Bluegills" (2020). Masters Theses. 4823. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4823 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSMENT OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO POSTHODIPLOSTOMUM MINIMUM INFECTION IN BLUEGILLS by Olamide S. Olayinka D.V.M., University of Ibadan, 2015 (Under the Direction of Dr Jeffrey R. Laursen) A Thesis Submitted for the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Biological Sciences Eastern Illinois University August 2020 1 ABSTRACT Bluegills (Lepomis macrochrius) are common intermediate hosts for white grub (Posthodiplostomum minimum). They tolerate heavy infections with minimal effect on condition and continue to accumulate metacercariae as they age. This suggests that any immune response to this parasite might not be effective. This study was conducted to better understand the immune mechanisms underlying P. minimum infection in bluegills. Infected organs (liver, kidney, and heart) were examined histologically, and serum from infected fish was tested for antibodies to white grub. Juvenile flukes were recovered from isolated metacercarial cysts.
    [Show full text]
  • Antigens & Antibodies II Polyclonal Antibodies Vs Monoclonal Antibodies
    A Brief Review of Antibody Structure A Brief Review of Antibody Structure Primary structure Tertiary structure The basic antibody is a dimer of dimer (2 heavy chain-light chain pairs) composed of repeats of a single structural unit known as the “immunoglobulin Secondary structure domain” Quaternary structure Antigens & Antibodies II Polyclonal antibodies vs Monoclonal antibodies Definitions A comparison of antigen recognition by B and T cells Polyclonal antibodies: antibody preparations from Factors that influence immunogenicity immunized animals. Consist of complex mixtures of different antibodies produced by many different B cell Quantitating the strength of antibody-antigen interactions clones Equilibrium constants equilibrium dialysis Monoclonal Antibody: homogeneous antibody preparations impact of multivalency produced in the laboratory. Consist of a single type of antigen binding site, produced by a single B cell clone Cross-reactivity of antibodies (later we’ll talk about how these are made). Measuring antibody-antigen binding Affinity between two macromolecules can measured using a biosensor Technique: Surface Plasmon Resonance Instrument: Biocore -Resonance units are proportional to the degree of binding of soluble ligand to the immobilized receptor. (or soluble antibody to immobilized antigen, as shown here) - Determining the amount of binding at equilibrium with different known concentrations of receptor (antibody) and ligand (protein antigen) allows you to calculate equilibrium constants (Ka, Kd). -Rate of dissociation and association (koff, kon) can also be calculated. 1 Avidity (strength of binding) is influenced by both Affinity refers to strength of binding of single Affinity (Ka of single binding site) x Valence of epitope to single antigen binding site. interaction (number of interacting binding sites) But antibodies have 2 or more identical binding sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive Immunotherapy of Viral Infections: 'Super-Antibodies'
    REVIEWS Passive immunotherapy of viral infections: ‘super-antibodies’ enter the fray Laura M. Walker1 and Dennis R. Burton2–4 Abstract | Antibodies have been used for more than 100 years in the therapy of infectious diseases, but a new generation of highly potent and/or broadly cross-reactive human monoclonal antibodies (sometimes referred to as ‘super-antibodies’) offers new opportunities for intervention. The isolation of these antibodies, most of which are rarely induced in human infections, has primarily been achieved by large-scale screening for suitable donors and new single B cell approaches to human monoclonal antibody generation. Engineering the antibodies to improve half-life and effector functions has further augmented their in vivo activity in some cases. Super-antibodies offer promise for the prophylaxis and therapy of infections with a range of viruses, including those that are highly antigenically variable and those that are newly emerging or that have pandemic potential. The next few years will be decisive in the realization of the promise of super-antibodies. The use of antibodies to ameliorate the adverse clini­ then the generation of fully human antibodies by vari­ cal effects of microbial infection can be traced back to ous techniques described below. Such antibodies have the late 19th century and the work of von Behring and been largely applied in the fields of oncology and auto­ Kitasato on the serum therapy of diphtheria and tetanus immunity. Only a single antiviral mAb, the RSV­specific (reviewed in REFS 1,2). In these settings, the antibodies antibody palivizumab, is in widespread clinical use. act to neutralize bacterial toxins.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoclonal Antibodies and Polyclonal Antibodies: a Brief Comparison Ahmed Adel Seida
    Editorial iMedPub Journals Advance Techniques in Clinical Microbiology 2017 http://www.imedpub.com/ Vol.1 No.2:10 Monoclonal Antibodies and Polyclonal Antibodies: A Brief Comparison Ahmed Adel Seida Immunology and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Corresponding author: Ahmed Adel Seida, Immunology and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, P.O. 12211, Egypt, Tel: +20237175004; Email: [email protected] Received date: April 11, 2017; Accepted date: April 21, 2017; Published date: April 27, 2017 Citation: Seida AA. Monoclonal Antibodies and Polyclonal Antibodies: A Brief Comparison. Adv Tech Clin Microbiol. 2017, 1:2. Copyright: © 2017 Seida AA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction produce hypersensitivity reactions, ability to generate huge quantities of identical antibody in the laboratory with high An antibody, a blood protein produced by plasma cells in homogeneity from batch to batch and produce better results in response to a specific antigen (foreign). the experimentations which need quantification of the protein levels. On the other hand, the disadvantages are significantly It is called an immunoglobulin that is used for neutralization more expensive to produce; more strict storage conditions of the foreign pathogens like viruses, bacteria or any foreign needed for the precious clone, required regular cell culture lab bodies invade the blood. When antibodies produced from work and purification, minor changes in the epitope’s structure immunized animals against certain antigen will produce what is able to reduce the ability of the monoclonal antibody to identify called polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) which are mixture of the target protein or epitope.
    [Show full text]