Abraham Lincoln and the Fifth Column
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lincoln and Habeas: of Merryman and Milligan and Mccardle
Lincoln and Habeas: Of Merryman and Milligan and McCardle John Yoo* Three cases define the Supreme Court's encounter with the Civil War: Ex parte Merryman,' Ex parte Milligan,2 and Ex parte McCardle.3 All three case names bear the styling "ex parte" because all three were brought on behalf of citizens detained by the armed forces of the Union. All three detainees sought release under the ancient writ of habeas corpus, which requires the government to demonstrate to a federal judge the factual and legal grounds for detention.4 I will explain why the cases of the Civil War did not assume the landmark importance, despite their circumstances and language, as a Marbury v. Madison, McCullough v. Maryland, or Brown v. Board of Education, but instead showed the deferential attitude of the Supreme Court to the other branches of the government during wartime. Merryman was a Maryland militia officer who had blown up railroad bridges between Washington, D.C. and the North, and was training secessionist troops in the earliest days of the Civil War.5 Milligan was an alleged member of an insurgent force in Indiana that was sympathetic to the Confederacy.6 He was tried and sentenced by a military commission-an old form of ad hoc military court established by commanders for the trial of violations of the laws of war and the administration of justice in occupied territory.7 * Distinguished Visiting Professor of Law, Chapman Law School (2008-09); Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley; Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute. The author thanks Ben Petersen and Janet Galeria for outstanding research assistance. -
And Justice for All: Indiana’S Federal Courts
And Justice for All: Indiana’s Federal Courts Teacher’s Guide Made possible with the support of The Historical Society of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Inc. Indiana Historical Society Heritage Support Grants are provided by the Indiana Historical Society and made possible by Lilly Endowment, Inc. The R. B. Annis Educational Foundation Indiana Bar Association This is a publication of Gudaitis Production 2707 S. Melissa Court 812-360-9011 Bloomington, IN 47401 Copyright 2017 The Historical Society of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Inc. All rights reserved The text of this publication may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the written permission of the copyright owner. All inquiries should be addressed to Gudaitis Production. Printed in the United States of America Contents Credits ............................................................................................................................iv Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 Curriculum Connection ..................................................................................................1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................3 Video Program Summary ...............................................................................................3 -
The Battle of Sailor's Creek
THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war. -
Ex Parte Milligan, 1866 SUPREME COURT CASE STUDY
Ex Parte Milligan, 1866 SUPREME COURT CASE STUDY Background of the Case In 1864 during the Civil War, Lambdin P. Milligan, a civilian resident of Indiana who was violently opposed to the war, was arrested by order of the commander of the mili- tary district of Indiana, General Hovey, for his part in a plot to free Confederate war prisoners and overthrow three state governments. He was tried in a military court even though state courts in Indiana were still functioning. The military court found Milligan guilty and sentenced him to death. This sentence was approved by President Andrew Johnson. Nine days before he was to be hanged, Milligan petitioned the United States Circuit Court for a writ of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is an order requiring that a pris- oner be brought before a court at a stated time and place to decide on the legality of his or her detention. Milligan claimed that the proceedings of his conviction were unconsti- tutional and that he was denied the right of a trial by jury. As a citizen of Indiana who was not in the military, Milligan claimed he should not have been tried by a military court. He appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. Constitutional Issue The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war and raise armies to fight the war. In order to carry on a war, the federal government often assumes powers that would be illegal in times of peace. As Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes stated in 1934,“the war power of the Federal government . -
The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts CITIES AT WAR: UNION ARMY MOBILIZATION IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1861-1865 A Dissertation in History by Timothy Justin Orr © 2010 Timothy Justin Orr Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The dissertation of Timothy Justin Orr was reviewed and approved* by the following: Carol Reardon Professor of Military History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Director of Graduate Studies in History Mark E. Neely, Jr. McCabe-Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Matthew J. Restall Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Colonial Latin American History, Anthropology, and Women‘s Studies Carla J. Mulford Associate Professor of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT During the four years of the American Civil War, the twenty-three states that comprised the Union initiated one of the most unprecedented social transformations in U.S. History, mobilizing the Union Army. Strangely, scholars have yet to explore Civil War mobilization in a comprehensive way. Mobilization was a multi-tiered process whereby local communities organized, officered, armed, equipped, and fed soldiers before sending them to the front. It was a four-year progression that required the simultaneous participation of legislative action, military administration, benevolent voluntarism, and industrial productivity to function properly. Perhaps more than any other area of the North, cities most dramatically felt the affects of this transition to war. Generally, scholars have given areas of the urban North low marks. Statistics refute pessimistic conclusions; northern cities appeared to provide a higher percentage than the North as a whole. -
Street Directory Listing
Prince William County Office of Information Technology STREET DIRECTORY LISTING Persons noting errors or omissions in this list are encouraged to notify the Office of Information Technology’s GIS Division at 5 County Complex Court Suite 140, Prince William, Virginia 22192 or Phone at 703-792-6840 8:00am EST to 5:00pm EST Monday through Friday. Date of this listing *** July 6, 2011*** Please call the GIS Division if more current information is required. This directory is published quarterly on or about the 15th of the third month of each quarter. Please note that a zero (0) address range indicates that there is no information available. An asterisk (*) indicates that a change was made on the entry during the most recent update. Street Type Codes Status Type Codes AL Alley RSV Reserved AR Arcade PREL Preliminary AV Avenue FINL Final Plan BL Boulevard REC Recorded CN Center U/C Under Construction CL Circle INSP Inspected CT Court 0000 VDOT Route Number DR Drive PRIV Private Road EX Expressway CITY Cities: Manassas and Manassas Park FY Freeway TOWN Towns: Quantico, Dumfries, Occoquan, HY Highway Haymarket LN Lane USMC Quantico Marine Corp Base LP Loop ME Mews PY Parkway PI Pike PL Place PZ Plaza RD Road SQ Square ST Street TR Terrace TY Throughway TL Trail TN Turn WY Way Street Name Type Status Subdivision/Area Low High Record Add Add Date 2ND AV 1405 TOWN OF QUANTICO 224 261 09/18/90 3RD AV 1404 TOWN OF QUANTICO 200 336 01/01/01 4TH AV 1403 TOWN OF QUANTICO 200 333 03/15/00 5TH AV TOWN TOWN OF QUANTICO 199 337 03/29/00 A A ST USMC QUANTICO -
CIVIL WAR on the WEB
THE CIVIL WAR on the WEB THE CIVIL WAR on the WEB A GUIDE TO THE VERY BEST SITES Completely Revised and Updated ALICE E. CARTER & RICHARD JENSEN Foreword by Gary W. Gallagher New Introduction by John C. Waugh © 2003 by Scholarly Resources Inc. All rights reserved First published 2003 Printed and bound in the United States of America Scholarly Resources Inc. 104 Greenhill Avenue Wilmington, DE 19805–1897 www.scholarly.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carter, Alice E., 1964— The Civil War on the Web : a guide to the very best sites / Alice E. Carter & Richard Jensen ; foreword by Gary W. Gallagher and new introduction by John C. Waugh. — Rev. & updated. p. cm. Rev. and updated ed. of: The Civil War on the Web / William G. Thomas, Alice E. Carter. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8420-5134-1 (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-8420-5135-X (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. United States—History—Civil War, 1861–1865—Computer network resources—Directories. 2. Web sites—Directories. I. Jensen, Richard J. II. Thomas, William G., 1964– Civil War on the Web. III. Title. E468.9 .C35 2003 025.06'9737—dc21 2003009604 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for permanence of paper for printed library mate- rials, Z39.48, 1984. A CKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Will Thomas, who co-authored the first edition and who developed the book’s organization and focus. Will’s scholarship, leadership, and innovation in putting history on the web have made the Internet a better place. -
Download Original 14.56 MB
S. 6. and E. L. ELBERT lln^ntleiVkt ella smith albert. 188 Jkx ilUumviaat XV KATHARINE E . COKAN The Life of Abraham Lincoln Volume Three Mt Xiift of jBC^raJam Unttoln ©raton ftom ortgfnal sources ano contamfng many ^>peec^e& Letter^ ano Celegramg &ft$etto unpublfstyeD ano 9!Uuj5tratcD toftto man? reproouctfonss from original painting ^footographj, etc. itfacoln f^fetot^ l&ocfetp jttcmbW Copyright, 1895, 1896, 1898, 1899 By The S. S. McClure Co. Copyright, 1900 By Doubleday & McClure Co. Copyright, 1900 By McClure, Phillips & Co. CONTENTS Volume TEbree CHAPTER PAGE XXIX. The First Inauguration of Lincoln—The Relief of Fort Sumter—Seward's Ambition to Control the Admin- istration I XXIII. The Beginning of Civil War 33 XXIV. The Failure of Fremont—Lincoln's First Difficulties with McClellan—The Death of Willie Lincoln . 61 XXV. Lincoln and Emancipation 93 XXVI. Lincoln's Search for a General 127 XXVII. Lincoln and the Soldiers 146 XXVIII. Lincoln's Re-election in 1864 170 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Volume Ubree PAGH Bust of Lincoln Frontispiece Lincoln's Inaugural Address facing 10 Lincoln Early in *6l •••••• • facing 40 Gen. Geo. B. McClellan facing 56 Willie Lincoln • • facing 88 Lincoln in 1861 facing 94 Lincoln in 1861, Age 52 facing 100 Lincoln Cabinet Room, White House .... facing 112 Reading Emancipation Proclamation .... facing 116 Lincoln at McClellan's Headquarters .... facing 130 General Jos. Hooker facing 138 H. W. Halleck facing 140 Grand Review, Army of Potomac • facing 142 Gen. Grant in 1863 facing 144 Lincoln in Camp • facing 148 Facsimile of Check • facing 150 Note to Secretary of War . -
Girding for War: the North and the South ---Civ:L'""-- 1861-1865
Girding for War: The North and the South ---civ:l'""-- 1861-1865 I CONSIDER THE CENTRAL IDEA PERVADING THIS STRUGGLE IS THE NECESSITY THAT IS UPON US, OF PROVING THAT POPULAR GOVERNMENT IS NOT AN ABSURDITY. WE MUST SETTLE THIS QUESTION NOW, WHETHER IN A FREE GOVERNMENT THE MINORITY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BREAK UP THE GOVERNMENT WHENEVER THEY CHOOSE. IF WE FAIL IT WILL GO FAR TO PROVE THE INCAPABILITY OF THE PEOPLE TO GOVERN THEMSELVES. ABRAHAM LINCOLN, MAY 7, 1861 braham Lincoln solemnly took the presidential oath The Menace of Secession A of office on March 4, 1861, after having slipped into Washington at night, partially disguised to thwart assas Lincoln's inaugural address was firm yet conciliatory: sins. He thus became president not of the United States there would be no conflict unless the South provoked it. of America, but of the dis-United States of America. Secession, the president declared, was wholly impractical, Seven had already departed; eight more teetered on the because "physically speaking, we cannot separate." edge. The girders of the unfinished Capitol dome Here Lincoln put his finger on a profound geo loomed nakedly in the background, as if to symbolize graphical truth. The North and South were Siamese the imperfect state of the Union. Before the nation was twins, bound inseparably together. If they had been restored-and the slaves freed at last-the American divided by the Pyrenees Mountains or the Danube River, people would endure four years of anguish and blood a sectional divorce might have been more feasible. But shed, and Lincoln would face tortuous trials of leader the Appalachian Mountains and the mighty Mississippi ship such as have been visited upon few presidents. -
History of the US Army Corps of Engineers
History of the US Army Corps of Engineers Course No: B07-002 Credit: 7 PDH Robert Steelhammer, P.E. Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: A History Headquarters U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Office of History Alexandria, Virginia 2008 This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of ISBN 978-0-16-079585-5 is for U.S. Government Printing Office Official Editions only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. It is prohibited to use the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers seal, as it appears on the cover, on any republication of this material without the express, written permission of the Office of History, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Any person using official seals and logos in a manner inconsistent with the Federal Regulations Act is subject to penalty. Foreword his illustrated history of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers provides an overview of many of the missions that engineers have performed in support of the U.S. Army and the Nation since the early days of the T American Revolution. A permanent institution since 1802, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has effect- ively and proudly responded to changing defense requirements and has played an integral part in the development of the Nation. -
DRUG DELIVERY Review and Outlook I N D U S T R Y G R O W T H T O C O N T I N U E T H R O U G H N E W Technologies
SPECIAL REPORT DECEMBER 2011 DRUG DELIVERY REVIEW AND OUTLOOK INDUSTRY GROWTH TO CONTINUE THROUGH NEW TECHNOLOGIES The worldwide drug-delivery arena is growing each year as the increasing aging population is in need of improved methods of administration for products and therapies. Drug-delivery industry growth is being led by the United States as well as emerging markets. Oral forms remain the preferred method of drug-delivery administration. Gaining in popularity are parenteral, inhalation and implantable systems. Elements impacting the development of drug-delivery systems include reimbursement, environmental factors, and regulatory processes. Product developers are coming up with better ways to improve therapy performance and safety as patients become more involved in their treatments in an effort to cut down on costs. New electronic technologies for reusable systems and disposable devices are leading to improved sales of auto-injectors. Microneedle technology is on the rise so that medicine can be precisely delivered to areas in need of treatment. UBM CANON DATA PRODUCTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 828B Newtown-Yardley Road, Suite B Drug-Delivery Industry Overview . Page 3 Newtown, PA 18940 Drug-Delivery Company Overview . 8 United States Phone: +1 .215 .944 .9800 Drug-Delivery Prescription Products Fax: +1 .215 .867 .0053 Website: PharmaLive .com Awaiting Approval . 26 Steve Corrick Phase III . 29 VP and Executive Director UBM Canon Publishing Phase II/III . 36 steve .corrick@ubm .com Phase II . 37 Roger Burg Phase I/II . 46 VP, Operations Publications Division Phase I . 47 roger .burg@ubm .com +1 .310 .445 .4221 Preclinical Development . 50 Glenn Glasberg Companies . 52 Circulation and Marketing Director glenn .glasberg@ubm .com Drug-Delivery Medical Devices +1 .215 .944 .9810 Class I Devices – General Controls – 510(k) Exempt . -
Billy Yank and Johnny Reb,” Pp
20 Girding for War: The North and the South ᇻᇾᇻ 1861–1865 I consider the central idea pervading this struggle is the necessity that is upon us, of proving that popular government is not an absurdity. We must settle this question now, whether in a free government the minority have the right to break up the government whenever they choose. If we fail it will go far to prove the incapability of the people to govern themselves. ABRAHAM LINCOLN, MAY 7, 1861 See DBQ 6 braham Lincoln solemnly took the presidential oath The Menace of Secession Aof office on March 4, 1861, after having slipped into Washington at night, partially disguised to thwart assas- Lincoln’s inaugural address was firm yet conciliatory: sins. He thus became president not of the United States there would be no conflict unless the South provoked it. of America, but of the dis-United States of America. Secession, the president declared, was wholly impractical, Seven had already departed; eight more teetered on the because “physically speaking, we cannot separate.” edge. The girders of the unfinished Capitol dome Here Lincoln put his finger on a profound geo- loomed nakedly in the background, as if to symbolize graphical truth. The North and South were Siamese the imperfect state of the Union. Before the nation was twins, bound inseparably together. If they had been restored—and the slaves freed at last—the American divided by the Pyrenees Mountains or the Danube River, people would endure four years of anguish and blood- a sectional divorce might have been more feasible.