nutrients Article The Role of Reduced Methionine in Mediating the Metabolic Responses to Protein Restriction Using Different Sources of Protein Han Fang 1 , Kirsten P. Stone 1 , Sujoy Ghosh 2,3 , Laura A. Forney 4 and Thomas W. Gettys 1,* 1 Laboratory of Nutrient Sensing & Adipocyte Signaling, 6400 Perkins Road, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA;
[email protected] (H.F.);
[email protected] (K.P.S.) 2 Laboratory of Computational Biology, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA;
[email protected] 3 Program in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders and Center for Computational Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore 4 Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
[email protected] * Correspondence:
[email protected] Abstract: Dietary protein restriction and dietary methionine restriction (MR) produce a comparable series of behavioral, physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional responses. Both dietary regimens produce a similar reduction in intake of sulfur amino acids (e.g., methionine and cystine), and both diets increase expression and release of hepatic FGF21. Given that FGF21 is an essential mediator of the metabolic phenotype produced by both diets, an important unresolved question is whether dietary protein restriction represents de facto methionine restriction. Using diets formulated from either casein or soy protein with matched reductions in sulfur amino acids, we compared the ability Citation: Fang, H.; Stone, K.P.; of the respective diets to recapitulate the metabolic phenotype produced by methionine restriction Ghosh, S.; Forney, L.A.; Gettys, T.W.