DOCSLIB.ORG

In the General Court of Justice First Settings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the General Court of Justice First Settings IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE ASHEVILLE, N.C. SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION BUNCOMBE COUNTY COURT DATE: 7/06/2021 TIME: 9:00 AM COURTROOM NUMBER: 0710 FIRST SETTINGS CALENDAR JUDGE PRESIDING: HONORABLE ALAN Z. THORNBURG COURTROOM CLERK: COURT REPORTER: DISTRICT ATTORNEY: TODD M. WILLIAMS ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS: DOUG EDWARDS, MEREDITH PRESSLEY, JEREMY INGLE, JUSTIN STEEN, NICK BENJAMIN, AMY BROUGHTON, MEREDITH MERCER, CATHERINE PEREZ, DAVID DENNINGER, DAVID LAMPERT, KYLE SHERARD, JORGE REDMOND ***Attendance is mandatory for Attorneys and Defendants pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Criminal Case Docketing Plan for the 28th Judicial District. If you have any questions please call Susanne Middleton at 259-6463 or Danielle Gelder at 259-6439. FIRST SETTING July 6, 2021 9 00 am All cases are set on this Calendar pursuant to the Criminal Case Docketing Plan for the 28th Judicial District. Attorneys are required to advise the District Attorneys Office when they are appointed or appear for a defendant. This Calendar will be called alphabetically by Attorney last names. Attendance is mandatory for Attorneys and Defendants. If you have any questions please call Susanne Middleton at 259-6463. AKHAVI,EHSAN BANKS,ROBERT,CHARLES,JR JRS 20CRS090766 POSSESSION OF STOLEN GOODS Y 20CRS090767 FELONY LARCENY Y 20CRS090768 RESISTING PUBLIC OFFICER Y 20CRS090769 DWLR NOT IMPAIRED REV Y RECKLESS DRIVING TO ENDANGER Y 20CRS090770 TRAFFICKING, OPIUM OR HEROIN Y 21CRS000226 HABITUAL FELON N BURGESS,HOWARD CNP 21CRS083221 FAIL REGISTER SEX OFFENDER(F) Y CLARK,AMANDA,JEAN JDI 20CRS087770 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y 20CRS087771 LARCENY OF A FIREARM Y 20CRS087813 LARCENY OF MOTOR VEHICLE (F) Y 20CRS087814 INJURY TO PERSONAL PROPERTY Y 20CRS090521 SECOND DEGREE BURGLARY Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y COREY,THOMAS,ADAM DJL 20CRS082770 PWIMSD SCH II CS Y 20CRS082771 POSSESS METHAMPHETAMINE Y 20CRS082772 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 1 MOORE,JEREMIAH,JOHN CNP 20CRS088617 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y 20CRS088619 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y 20CRS088619 LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y 20CRS088620 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y SIGMON,MORGAN,MCKINLEY JDI 21CRS081401 FELONY LARCENY N 21CRS081402 BREAK OR ENTER A MOTOR VEHICLE N SMITH,NICHOLAS,NATHANIAL DPE 20CRS089555 INTERFERING WITH ELECTRONIC MONITORING Y 21CRS082224 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Y 21CRS082225 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 21CRS082312 POSSESS WEAPON MASS DESTRUCT Y 21CRS082313 RESISTING PUBLIC OFFICER Y CARRYING CONCEALED GUN(M) Y SMITH,TYRIUS,EUGENE DPE 21CRS080901 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Y WHITESIDE,GERALD,JR JDI 21CRS000248 HABITUAL FELON N 21CRS081915 LARCENY BY EMPLOYEE Y 2 ALLISON,JANNA,D BLOUNT,JASON,VALORR JDI 20CRS088486 RESISTING PUBLIC OFFICER Y SIMPLE ASSAULT Y 21CRS000231 FIRST DEGREE BURGLARY N LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER N 21CRS000232 COMMON LAW ROBBERY N BROWN,SIERRA,SHUNTAY DJL 20CRS085660 OBTAIN PROPERTY FALSE PRETENSE Y 20CRS085661 FORGERY OF INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS085697 OBTAIN PROPERTY FALSE PRETENSE Y 20CRS085698 UTTERING FORGED INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS085699 POSS 5+ COUNTERFEIT INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS086856 OBTAIN PROPERTY FALSE PRETENSE Y BURGESS,WILLIAM,MARLON JRS 20CRS084788 TRAFFICK IN METHAMPHETAMINE Y 20CRS084789 TRAFFICK IN METHAMPHETAMINE Y 20CRS084790 PWISD SCH II CS Y LOPEZ,DAMIAN,JOSE DPE 19CRS088417 POS/SELL/BUY ALT GUN SERIAL NO Y 19CRS089062 SECOND DEGREE TRESPASS Y 19CRS089063 CARRYING CONCEALED GUN(M) Y POSSESS HANDGUN BY MINOR Y 19CRS089065 PWISD SCH II CS Y 19CRS089066 ALTER/REMOVE GUN SERIAL NUMBER Y 19CRS089298 POS/SELL/BUY ALT GUN SERIAL NO Y 19CRS089299 PWIMSD SCH II CS Y 3 AMBURGEY,JAMES,THOMAS JEFFRIES,DARRYL,LYNDON NEB 20CRS000155 FIRST DEGREE MURDER Y 20CRS000156 ROBBERY WITH DANGEROUS WEAPON Y 20CRS000196 FIRST DEGREE MURDER Y SIMPSON,DENIKKA,MICHELE CNP 20CRS090778 COMMON LAW ROBBERY Y 20CRS090779 ASSAULT BY STRANGULATION Y WILSON,LAWRENCE,EDWARD NEB 20CRS084349 RECKLESS DRVG-WANTON DISREGARD Y 20CRS084350 FAIL TO HEED LIGHT OR SIREN Y SPEEDING Y 20CRS084375 FLEE/ELUDE ARREST W/MV (F) Y BESEN,TED,J ALLEN-WILLIAMS,KALEN,MONTAE NEB 20CRS090932 FIRST DEGREE BURGLARY N 20CRS090933 ATT ROBBERY-DANGEROUS WEAPON N 20CRS090934 CONSP ROBBERY DANGRS WEAPON N 20CRS090935 AWDW SERIOUS INJURY N 20CRS090976 SECOND DEGREE TRESPASS N POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA N 21CRS000067 PWIMSD SCH II CS N POPE,CARLOS,NATHAN DPE 21CRS083462 CARRYING CONCEALED GUN(M) Y 21CRS083463 POSSESS STOLEN MOTOR VEHICLE Y 21CRS083464 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Y 4 RADEKER,DAVID CNP 20CRS091047 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON N ROBERTS,DEVERON,ANGELO DPE 20CRS080474 FIRST DEGREE MURDER Y SEXTON,CHAD,NATHANIEL NEB 20CRS082980 PWISD METHAMPHETAMINE Y 20CRS082981 RESISTING PUBLIC OFFICER Y 20CRS082982 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 21CRS080811 POSSESS STOLEN MOTOR VEHICLE Y 21CRS080812 LARCENY OF MOTOR VEHICLE (F) Y 21CRS081963 ATTEMPT FIRST DEGREE MURDER Y 21CRS081984 AWDW INTENT TO KILL Y 21CRS081985 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Y BOOTH,COURTNEY,V GETTINGER,TAYLOR,JOYCE JRS 21CRS082154 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 21CRS082155 PWISD SCH VI CS Y 21CRS082156 PWISD METHAMPHETAMINE Y 21CRS082157 TRAFFICKING, OPIUM OR HEROIN Y 21CRS082158 MAINTN VEH/DWELL/PLACE CS (F) Y 21CRS082159 PWISD SCH II CS Y 21CRS082160 TRAFFICKING, OPIUM OR HEROIN Y 21CRS082161 PWISD SCH II CS Y 21CRS082162 MAINTN VEH/DWELL/PLACE CS (F) Y 21CRS082163 PWISD METHAMPHETAMINE Y 21CRS082164 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 5 HARBOUR,DYLAN,QUENTIN DPE 21CRS083518 CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON Y POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 21CRS083519 PWISD SCH VI CS Y 21CRS083520 SIMPLE POSSESS SCH IV CS (M) Y RECKLESS DRIVING TO ENDANGER Y 21CRS083521 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Y HOUSE,DANIEL,LORIN DJL 20CRS082092 FINANCIAL CARD FRAUD (M) Y 20CRS082093 FINANCIAL CARD THEFT Y 21CRS000184 HABITUAL FELON Y HUNNICUTT,JOSHUA,RYAN JDI 20CRS090801 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Y 20CRS090802 PWISD METHAMPHETAMINE Y 20CRS090803 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 21CRS081849 SELL/DELIVER SCH II CS Y 21CRS081850 POSSESS METHAMPHETAMINE Y 21CRS082581 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 21CRS082582 MAINTN VEH/DWELL/PLACE CS (F) Y 21CRS082583 PWISD SCH II CS Y 21CRS082584 PWISD METHAMPHETAMINE Y MOORE,CHRISTOPHER,DARYN NEB 19CRS091925 OBTAIN PROPERTY FALSE PRETENSE Y 19CRS091926 POSS STOLEN GOODS/PROP (F) Y 20CRS000331 PWIMSD SCH II CS Y 20CRS000332 FELONY POSSESSION SCH II CS Y 20CRS081337 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 20CRS081338 MAINTN VEH/DWELL/PLACE CS (F) Y 20CRS081340 PWISD SCH II CS Y 20CRS081341 FELONY POSSESSION SCH II CS Y 20CRS083100 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Y 6 MUSSO,LAUREN JDI 20CRS091756 IDENTITY THEFT Y 20CRS091757 UTTERING FORGED ENDORSEMENT Y 20CRS091758 FLEE/ELUDE ARREST W/MV (F) Y 20CRS091759 AWDW GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL Y 20CRS091760 DWLR NOT IMPAIRED REV Y FICT/ALT TITLE/REG CARD/TAG Y 20CRS091761 RESISTING PUBLIC OFFICER Y DRIVE LEFT OF CENTER Y 20CRS091828 FORGERY OF INSTRUMENT Y UTTERING FORGED INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS091830 IDENTITY THEFT Y 20CRS091831 FORGERY OF INSTRUMENT Y UTTERING FORGED INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS091833 IDENTITY THEFT Y 20CRS091834 FORGERY OF INSTRUMENT Y UTTERING FORGED INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS091836 IDENTITY THEFT Y 20CRS091837 FORGERY OF INSTRUMENT Y UTTERING FORGED INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS091839 IDENTITY THEFT Y 20CRS091840 FORGERY OF INSTRUMENT Y UTTERING FORGED INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS091842 IDENTITY THEFT Y 20CRS091843 FORGERY OF INSTRUMENT Y UTTERING FORGED INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS091845 IDENTITY THEFT Y 20CRS091846 FORGERY OF INSTRUMENT Y UTTERING FORGED INSTRUMENT Y 20CRS091848 IDENTITY THEFT Y SCOTT,DEMARCUS,DEQUAN JRS 20CRS091265 TRAFFICKING, OPIUM OR HEROIN Y 20CRS091266 TRAFFICKING, OPIUM OR HEROIN Y 20CRS091267 PWISD SCH IV CS Y 20CRS091268 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y TISDALE,CHRISTIN,LEIGH JDI 21CRS080628 OBTAIN PROPERTY FALSE PRETENSE Y 21CRS080629 OBTAIN PROPERTY FALSE PRETENSE Y 21CRS080630 OBTAIN PROPERTY FALSE PRETENSE Y 21CRS080966 OBTAIN PROPERTY FALSE PRETENSE Y 7 BOWMAN,JOSEPH,CARROLL ADLER,PAUL,MICHAEL DHD 20CRS092140 DISTRIBUTE CERTAIN FOOD AT HALLOWEEN/ALL OTH Y CORN,DAKOTA,ALLEN NEB 20CRS088969 POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON Y 20CRS088972 POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y SIMPLE POSSESS SCH VI CS (M) Y 21CRS000194 FELONY POSSESSION SCH II CS Y 21CRS000195 HABITUAL FELON Y 21CRS000196 POS/SELL/BUY ALT GUN SERIAL NO Y GOSNELL,MICHAEL,EDWARD,JR DPE 21CRS000219 HABITUAL FELON Y 21CRS000220 HABITUAL FELON Y 21CRS000221 HABITUAL FELON Y 21CRS000222 HABITUAL FELON Y 21CRS082267 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y 21CRS082268 INJURY TO REAL PROPERTY Y 21CRS082269 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y 21CRS082270 INJURY TO REAL PROPERTY Y 21CRS082271 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y 21CRS082273 INJURY TO REAL PROPERTY Y 21CRS082521 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y 21CRS082522 INJURY TO REAL PROPERTY Y HARTRICK,ERICA,MARIE NEB 20CRS085882 KIDNAPPING Y 20CRS085883 FELONY CONSPIRACY Y 21CRS083618 LARCENY OF MOTOR VEHICLE (F) Y 21CRS083619 INJURY TO PERSONAL PROPERTY Y 21CRS083620 ROBBERY WITH DANGEROUS WEAPON Y 8 JONES,ANTHONY,ROBERT JRS 19CRS091596 POSSESS METHAMPHETAMINE Y 19CRS091597 POSSESS MARIJ PARAPHERNALIA Y POSSESS DRUG PARAPHERNALIA Y 19CRS091598 BREAKING AND OR ENTERING (F) Y LARCENY AFTER BREAK/ENTER Y 20CRS088623 INJURY TO PERSONAL PROPERTY Y 20CRS088626 MISDEMEANOR LARCENY Y 20CRS088628 POSSESS MARIJ PARAPHERNALIA Y 20CRS088630 FIRST DEGREE BURGLARY Y 20CRS088631 FELONY CONSPIRACY Y 20CRS088633 POSS STOLEN GOODS/PROP (M) Y CASTERLINE,MICHAEL BUCKNER,NICOLE,BROOKE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Charging Language
    1. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abduction ................................................................................................73 By Relative.........................................................................................415-420 See Kidnapping Abuse, Animal ...............................................................................................358-362,365-368 Abuse, Child ................................................................................................74-77 Abuse, Vulnerable Adult ...............................................................................78,79 Accessory After The Fact ..............................................................................38 Adultery ................................................................................................357 Aircraft Explosive............................................................................................455 Alcohol AWOL Machine.................................................................................19,20 Retail/Retail Dealer ............................................................................14-18 Tax ................................................................................................20-21 Intoxicated – Endanger ......................................................................19 Disturbance .......................................................................................19 Drinking – Prohibited Places .............................................................17-20 Minors – Citation Only
    [Show full text]
  • Common Law Fraud Liability to Account for It to the Owner
    FRAUD FACTS Issue 17 March 2014 (3rd edition) INFORMATION FOR ORGANISATIONS Fraud in Scotland Fraud does not respect boundaries. Fraudsters use the same tactics and deceptions, and cause the same harm throughout the UK. However, the way in which the crimes are defined, investigated and prosecuted can depend on whether the fraud took place in Scotland or England and Wales. Therefore it is important for Scottish and UK-wide businesses to understand the differences that exist. What is a ‘Scottish fraud’? Embezzlement Overview of enforcement Embezzlement is the felonious appropriation This factsheet focuses on criminal fraud. There are many interested parties involved in of property without the consent of the owner In Scotland criminal fraud is mainly dealt the detection, investigation and prosecution with under the common law and a number where the appropriation is by a person who of statutory offences. The main fraud offences has received a limited ownership of the of fraud in Scotland, including: in Scotland are: property, subject to restoration at a future • Police Service of Scotland time, or possession of property subject to • common law fraud liability to account for it to the owner. • Financial Conduct Authority • uttering There is an element of breach of trust in • Trading Standards • embezzlement embezzlement making it more serious than • Department for Work and Pensions • statutory frauds. simple theft. In most cases embezzlement involves the appropriation of money. • Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. It is important to note that the Fraud Act 2006 does not apply in Scotland (apart from Statutory frauds s10(1) which increases the maximum In addition there are a wide range of statutory Investigating fraud custodial sentence for fraudulent trading to offences which are closely related to the 10 years).
    [Show full text]
  • CRIME How to Respond to Unlawful Behaviour Crime Is an Undeniable Part of Our Lives; Unfortunately We May Find Ourselves Victims
    CRIME How to respond to unlawful behaviour Crime is an undeniable part of our lives; unfortunately we may find ourselves victims, perpetrators or witnesses of illegal actions varying in severity. To better understand the legality of certain actions (and inactions) is to be able to make ethical decisions to improve the safety in our communities. Are all crimes the same? NO. There are two categories of offences in the Criminal Code: indictable and summary. The category determines the jurisdiction of trial courts (provincial or superior), the possibility of having a jury trial or a preliminary inquiry, the application of limitation periods and the default maximum penalties. Summary offences are commonly known as the lesser offences. They carry a default maximum penalty (i.e. if not specified in the provision) of 6 months imprisonment and/or 5 000$ fine. They are subject to a limitation period of 6 months to start the prosecution. Indictable offences are commonly known as the most serious offences. They carry a default maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment. Subject to certain exceptions, there is no statute of limitations. What do I do if I witness a crime? Contact the police as early as possible. Write down any information you can remember to give a complete account to the police or in case you are called to testify at court. If you have any concerns, you should consult a lawyer. What if I committed a crime but didn’t know that it was illegal at the time? As stated by s. 19 of the Criminal Code, “ignorance of the law by a person who commits an offence is not an excuse for committing that offence.” What if I just helped someone commit a crime? (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Timely History of Cheating and Fraud Following Ivey V Genting Casinos (UK)
    The honest cheat: a timely history of cheating and fraud following Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd t/a Crockfords [2017] UKSC 67 Cerian Griffiths Lecturer in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Lancaster University Law School1 Author email: [email protected] Abstract: The UK Supreme Court took the opportunity in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd t/a Crockfords [2017] UKSC 67 to reverse the long-standing, but unpopular, test for dishonesty in R v Ghosh. It reduced the relevance of subjectivity in the test of dishonesty, and brought the civil and the criminal law approaches to dishonesty into line by adopting the test as laid down in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan. This article employs extensive legal historical research to demonstrate that the Supreme Court in Ivey was too quick to dismiss the significance of the historical roots of dishonesty. Through an innovative and comprehensive historical framework of fraud, this article demonstrates that dishonesty has long been a central pillar of the actus reus of deceptive offences. The recognition of such significance permits us to situate the role of dishonesty in contemporary criminal property offences. This historical analysis further demonstrates that the Justices erroneously overlooked centuries of jurisprudence in their haste to unite civil and criminal law tests for dishonesty. 1 I would like to thank Lindsay Farmer, Dave Campbell, and Dave Ellis for giving very helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this article. I would also like to thank Angus MacCulloch, Phil Lawton, and the Lancaster Law School Peer Review College for their guidance in developing this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Res Judicata and Conspiracy John R
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 39 | Issue 1 Article 7 1948 Res Judicata and Conspiracy John R. Gehlbach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation John R. Gehlbach, Res Judicata and Conspiracy, 39 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 58 (1948-1949) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. CRIMINAL LAW COMMENTS [Vol. 39 has been a tendency to carry its application to extremes. The minority approach of Texas and Maryland seems the more desirable; in other words, a waiver of the right of confrontation should be permitted only when personally requested by the accused, and when he has a full under- standing of the consequences.13 Three problems are raised in each case involving waiver: was the waiver actually made; if so, was it done know- ingly; and even if made with full knowledge, should it be permitted? The rule should not be permitted to operate automatically upon the re- quest of the defendant or his attorney. Some examination into the causes and circumstances which have resulted in the request should be made by the court, and discretion should be used in the granting or denial of such a request. KENN-r H. HANSON Res Judicata and Conspiracy The United States Supreme Court in Sealfon v.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of a Sample of Felony Offenses
    NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION CLASSIFICATION OF A SAMPLE OF OFFENSES (Effective 12/1/17) CLASS A FELONIES Maximum Punishment of Death or Life Without Parole First-Degree Murder. (14-17) CLASS B1 FELONIES Maximum Punishment of Life Without Parole First-Degree Forcible Sexual Offense. (14-27.26)/First-Degree Second-Degree Murder. (14-17(b)) Statutory Sexual Offense. (14-27.29) First-Degree Forcible Rape. (14-27.21)/First-Degree Statutory Rape (14-27.24) CLASS B2 FELONIES Maximum Punishment of 484* Months Second-Degree Murder. (14-17(b)(1) and (2)) CLASS C FELONIES Maximum Punishment of 231* Months Second-Degree Forcible Rape. (14-27.22) First-Degree Kidnapping. (14-39) Second-Degree Forcible Sexual Offense. (14-27.27) Embezzlement (amount involved $100,000 or more). (14-90) Assault W/D/W/I/K/I/S/I. (14-32(a)) CLASS D FELONIES Maximum Punishment of 204* Months Voluntary Manslaughter. (14-18) Child Abuse Inflicting Serious Physical Injury. (14-318.4(a)) First-Degree Burglary. (14-51) Death by Vehicle. (20-141.4(a)(1)) First-Degree Arson. (14-58) Sell or Deliver a Controlled Substance to a Person Under 16 But Armed Robbery. (14-87) More than 13 Years of Age. (90-95(e)(5)) CLASS E FELONIES Maximum Punishment of 88* Months Sexual Activity by a Substitute Parent or Custodian. (14-27.31) Assault with a Firearm on a Law Enforcement Officer. (14-34.5) Assault W/D/W/I/S/I. (14-32(b)) Second-Degree Kidnapping. (14-39) Assault W/D/W/I/K.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentencing Guidelines Offense Table (Updated 11/2/20)
    Appendix A Sentencing Guidelines Offense Table (Updated 11/2/20) Appendix A contains a table of guidelines offenses including their CJIS code, statutory source, seriousness category, and penalties. If an offense is not listed in Appendix A and the offense has a maximum penalty of one year or less, the offense should be identified as a category VII offense. If an offense is not listed in Appendix A and the maximum penalty is greater than one year, the individual completing the worksheet should use the seriousness category for the closest analogous offense and the sentencing judge and the parties should be notified. If there are any questions about how to categorize or score an offense, please call the Maryland State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy staff at (301) 403-4165. November 2020 121 INDEX OF OFFENSES Abuse & Other Offensive Conduct ......................... 1 Kidnapping & Related Crimes .............................. 33 Accessory After the Fact ......................................... 2 Labor Trafficking ................................................... 33 Alcoholic Beverages ................................................ 2 Lotteries ................................................................. 33 Animals, Crimes Against ......................................... 3 Machine Guns ........................................................ 34 Arson & Burning ...................................................... 3 Malicious Destruction & Related Crimes ............. 34 Assault & Other Bodily Woundings .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Forgers and Fiction: How Forgery Developed the Novel, 1846-79
    Forgers and Fiction: How Forgery Developed the Novel, 1846-79 Paul Ellis University College London Doctor of Philosophy UMI Number: U602586 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U602586 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 Abstract This thesis argues that real-life forgery cases significantly shaped the form of Victorian fiction. Forgeries of bills of exchange, wills, parish registers or other documents were depicted in at least one hundred novels between 1846 and 1879. Many of these portrayals were inspired by celebrated real-life forgery cases. Forgeries are fictions, and Victorian fiction’s representations of forgery were often self- reflexive. Chapter one establishes the historical, legal and literary contexts for forgery in the Victorian period. Chapter two demonstrates how real-life forgers prompted Victorian fiction to explore its ambivalences about various conceptions of realist representation. Chapter three shows how real-life forgers enabled Victorian fiction to develop the genre of sensationalism. Chapter four investigates how real-life forgers influenced fiction’s questioning of its epistemological status in Victorian culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 21. Forgery. § 14-119. Forgery of Notes, Checks, and Other Securities; Counterfeiting of Instruments
    Article 21. Forgery. § 14-119. Forgery of notes, checks, and other securities; counterfeiting of instruments. (a) It is unlawful for any person to forge or counterfeit any instrument, or possess any counterfeit instrument, with the intent to injure or defraud any person, financial institution, or governmental unit. Any person in violation of this subsection is guilty of a Class I felony. (b) Any person who transports or possesses five or more counterfeit instruments with the intent to injure or defraud any person, financial institution, or governmental unit is guilty of a Class G felony. (c) As used in this Article, the term: (1) "Counterfeit" means to manufacture, copy, reproduce, or forge an instrument that purports to be genuine, but is not, because it has been falsely copied, reproduced, forged, manufactured, embossed, encoded, duplicated, or altered. (2) "Financial institution" means any mutual fund, money market fund, credit union, savings and loan association, bank, or similar institution, either foreign or domestic. (3) "Governmental unit" means the United States, any United States territory, any state of the United States, any political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality of any state, or any foreign jurisdiction. (4) "Instrument" means (i) any currency, bill, note, warrant, check, order, or similar instrument of or on any financial institution or governmental unit, or any cashier or officer of the institution or unit; or (ii) any security issued by, or on behalf of, any corporation, financial institution, or governmental unit. (1819, c. 994, s. 1, P.R.; R.C., c. 34, s. 60; Code, s. 1030; Rev., s. 3419; C.S., s.
    [Show full text]
  • BASIC CRIMINAL LAW LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION .4B Manonal CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE (Forger, ) WASHINGTON, D.C
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. , • ~. • ~ ,'11 t' • • . • I . I~/.''- " I I) . ~ , I SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT ETY This micnfiche WIS produced from documents received for TRAINING PROGRAM inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since HCJRS Clnnot exercise control mer the physical condition of the documents submitted, thti individual frame quality will vary. The resolution ch.ut on this frallle may be used to euluate the document quality. 2 5 11111 . 1.1 11 ::::i 111111.8 111111.25 111111.4 11111 1.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NAT/ONAl BUREAU or STANDARDS-I963_A Microfilminl procedures used to cnate this fiche cOlllply with the standards set forth in 41CFR 101.11.504 POints of view or opinions stated in this docu.llt are those of th author(s) and do not represent th official position or pOlicies of the U.S. Dep;rtlllut of Justin. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BASIC CRIMINAL LAW LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION .4b MAnONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE (Forger, ) WASHINGTON, D.C. 20531 • PART XI ·1/28/76 STUDY WORKBOOK ....~ " SOUlll CAROLINA LAW ENfORCEMENT DIVIS'OII • ill C..,.,.tlill wltll SOUTH CAROLINA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION METWOII( ••• • -~. \ I U 't:dl'({''''1 l()~;O I ------SOUTH ---------CAROLINA ---LAW ENFORCEMENT-~--- ---------TRAINING --------PROGRAM FROM CRIME TO COURT ~ ./ ,-I' ;?~~ . " • • ~)~aSiC Criminal Law~ '\ i I I Part ~ I! - r-:; ;'~'-e- '1 ) ::';k,. I J I f I 0, • Study Workbook )\ ",~,-..:.c, IC.~, ___"""",:","" '''''''41)" •.,;, .... ..:;.:...""-... ;.• Wf"lis:;,.g,ld..riCl!lMi!t~i~ .. ;..ei,!'2d --~---,-,,-~,,-- ""f" I • • ANSWER SHEET l. is 25. deed 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fraud Trial
    THE FRAUD TRIAL GLOBAL HeAdquArters • tHe GreGOr BuiLdinG 716 West Ave • Austin, tX 78701-2727 • usA The Law Against Fraud II. THE LAW AGAINST FRAUD Fraud is distinguished from larceny or theft. The elements of criminal and civil fraud hinge on willful acts of misrepresentation. Selected criminal and civil laws are defined. Background and Definitions of Fraud Early references to fraud in English common law—the legal system on which the U.S. system is based— define it as cheating or deceit. A common-law cheat was someone who, by false pretenses, false tokens, or intentionally false representations, induced someone else to part with their property or personal rights. Common-law cheating or fraud was considered both a crime (a misdemeanor, as opposed to larceny, which was a felony) and grounds for civil action. Fraud, then, has a historical foothold in English civil law as well as in criminal law. This dual status is retained in modern U.S. courts. For many frauds, criminal and civil actions are both pursued in relation to the same act: Prosecutors may file a criminal complaint and the damaged party can file a civil action for recovery of damages or property. Similarly, tax evasion can be treated as a criminal and civil fraud. In many states, fraud is now considered larceny by trick or false pretenses. Larceny refers to what is more widely called theft, and it is defined as the wrongful taking of money or property of another with the intent to convert the money or property or to deprive the owner of its possession and use.
    [Show full text]
  • Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes Larry Alexander
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 87 Article 2 Issue 4 Summer Summer 1997 Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes Larry Alexander Kimberly D. Kessler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Larry Alexander, Kimberly D. Kessler, Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes, 87 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1138 (1996-1997) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/97/8704-1138 THE JouRmAL OF CRIMINAL LAw & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 87, No. 4 Copyright © 1997 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. MENS REA AND INCHOATE CRIMES LARRY ALEX&ND* KIMBERLY D. KESSLER** I. INTRODUCTION When a defendant engages in proscribed conduct or in conduct that brings about a forbidden result, our interest focuses on his state of mind at the time he engages in the proscribed conduct or the con- duct that causes the result. We usually are unconcerned with his state(s) of mind in the period leading up to the conduct. The narra- tive of the crime can begin as late as the moment defendant engages in the conduct (or, in the case of completed attempts,1 believes he is engaging in the conduct). Criminal codes do not restrict themselves to proscribing harmful conduct or results, however, but also criminalize various acts that pre- cede harmful conduct.
    [Show full text]