2011 Population and Housing Census

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2011 Population and Housing Census 2011 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS Hardap Regional tables based on 4th Delimitation Basic tables with estimated figures Foreword Foreword The first Population and Housing Census in an independent Namibia was conducted in 1991. Since then, a Census has been undertaken every ten years, and the 2011 Population and Housing Census marks Namibia’s third census since independence in 1990. The Census is demonstrative of the Namibia Statistics Agency’s (NSA) commitment to providing relevant and quality statistics to support decision making, policy formulation and monitoring of development programmes. The regional tables present the results of the 2011 Namibia Population and Housing Census for the Hardap Region. The regional tables compliment the regional profiles report to accommodate the changes introduced by the 4th Delimitation Commission. The information provided include total population, fertility, mortality, education, labour force and households condition/characteristics for the region and constituencies. Indicators not provided herein, can be provide to users upon request. We are hopeful that the users will find its contents useful for their decision making and planning purposes, including business investments. Our commitment is to ensure that all statistics required by our users are readily available. DR. JOHN STEYTLER STATISTICIAN GENERAL NAMIBIA STATISTICS AGENCY 2011 Population and Housing Census i Content Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................... i Contents ................................................................................................................................................... ii 1. Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Population Structure ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Population Characteristics ................................................................................................................... 6 4. Population Trends ................................................................................................................................ 8 5. Socio-Economic Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 17 6. Household Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 44 7. Housing Characteristics ...................................................................................................................... 48 2011 Population and Housing Census ii Chapter 1: Background 1.1 Background Hardap Region is one of the fourteen regions of Namibia that was affected by the 4th Delimitation Commission and announced in the Government Gazette of August 2013, its capital is Mariental. The NSA saw the need of producing additional tables to accommodate the changes introduced by the 4th Delimitation Commission. The information provided include total population, fertility, mortality, education, labour force and households condition/characteristics for the region. Hardap region comprises of six (8) constituencies, namely: Aranos, Daweb, Gibeon, Mariental Rural, Mariental Urban, Rehoboth East Urban, Rehoboth Rural and Rehoboth West Urban. 2011 Population and Housing Census 1 Chapter 2: Population Structure Table 2.1 Total population by sex and single years, Hardap Age Total Female Male Age Total Female Male 0 2022 978 1044 49 807 397 410 1 1904 937 967 50 756 392 364 2 1832 940 892 51 653 339 314 3 1843 952 891 52 644 331 313 4 1891 902 989 53 630 321 309 5 1854 931 923 54 613 315 298 6 1782 925 857 55 529 269 260 7 1507 735 772 56 533 274 259 8 1682 848 834 57 449 197 252 9 1530 741 789 58 535 266 269 10 1672 807 865 59 560 276 284 11 1945 948 997 60 501 259 242 12 1558 762 796 61 402 218 184 13 1693 869 824 62 448 224 224 14 1562 777 785 63 402 205 197 15 1539 782 757 64 389 205 184 16 1527 795 732 65 376 213 163 17 1346 648 698 66 274 142 132 18 1589 777 812 67 279 142 137 19 1545 761 784 68 267 161 106 20 1638 764 874 69 272 146 126 21 1619 768 851 70 235 125 110 22 1395 628 767 71 210 106 104 23 1511 739 772 72 216 125 91 24 1371 622 749 73 215 120 95 25 1447 675 772 74 205 113 92 26 1387 637 750 75 179 107 72 27 1323 631 692 76 187 109 78 28 1316 593 723 77 140 77 63 29 1282 593 689 78 118 60 58 30 1257 576 681 79 99 62 37 31 1206 551 655 80 104 70 34 32 1216 561 655 81 90 51 39 33 1061 503 558 82 93 58 35 34 1038 446 592 83 68 43 25 35 1050 468 582 84 47 27 20 36 1025 465 560 85 57 34 23 37 883 426 457 86 44 26 18 38 1048 499 549 87 44 34 10 39 1010 479 531 88 30 18 12 40 1016 504 512 89 29 21 8 41 892 414 478 90 29 15 14 42 967 475 492 91 21 14 7 43 924 472 452 92 14 5 9 44 795 396 399 93 17 12 5 45 929 437 492 94 18 12 6 46 708 354 354 95+ 63 36 27 47 678 323 355 Total 79507 38935 40572 48 801 349 452 2011 Population and Housing Census 2 Chapter 2: Population Structure Table 2.2 Population distribution by age Table 2.4 Population distribution by age group and sex, Hardap group and sex, Daweb Age group Total Female Male Age group Total Female Male Total 79 507 38 935 40 572 Total 5 768 2 780 2 988 0 - 4 9 492 4 709 4 783 0 - 4 635 323 312 5 - 9 8 355 4 180 4 175 5 - 9 637 316 321 10 - 14 8 430 4 163 4 267 10 - 14 600 305 295 15 - 19 7 546 3 763 3 783 15 - 19 425 228 197 20 - 24 7 534 3 521 4 013 20 - 24 499 244 255 25 - 29 6 755 3 129 3 626 25 - 29 577 265 312 30 - 34 5 778 2 637 3 141 30 - 34 486 215 271 35 - 39 5 016 2 337 2 679 35 - 39 343 144 199 40 - 44 4 594 2 261 2 333 40 - 44 329 137 192 45 - 49 3 923 1 860 2 063 45 - 49 274 128 146 50 - 54 3 296 1 698 1 598 50 - 54 234 111 123 55 - 59 2 606 1 282 1 324 55 - 59 228 106 122 60 - 64 2 142 1 111 1 031 60 - 64 183 87 96 65 - 69 1 468 804 664 65 - 69 112 62 50 70 - 74 1 081 589 492 70 - 74 84 38 46 75 - 79 723 415 308 75 - 79 60 34 26 80 - 84 402 249 153 80 - 84 33 23 10 85 - 89 204 133 71 85 - 89 18 11 7 90 - 94 99 58 41 90 - 94 3 1 2 95+ 63 36 27 95+ 8 2 6 Table 2.3 Population distribution by age Table 2.5 Population distribution by age group and sex, Aranos group and sex, Gibeon Age group Total Female Male Age group Total Female Male Total 8 528 4 150 4 378 Total 6 354 3 053 3 301 0 - 4 1 100 544 556 0 - 4 852 409 443 5 - 9 951 475 476 5 - 9 759 383 376 10 - 14 970 480 490 10 - 14 737 368 369 15 - 19 793 403 390 15 - 19 589 269 320 20 - 24 826 371 455 20 - 24 512 241 271 25 - 29 704 327 377 25 - 29 426 192 234 30 - 34 593 269 324 30 - 34 380 169 211 35 - 39 490 235 255 35 - 39 292 138 154 40 - 44 502 242 260 40 - 44 307 142 165 45 - 49 361 170 191 45 - 49 306 136 170 50 - 54 358 173 185 50 - 54 263 139 124 55 - 59 258 125 133 55 - 59 244 102 142 60 - 64 232 127 105 60 - 64 232 107 125 65 - 69 146 71 75 65 - 69 154 82 72 70 - 74 96 54 42 70 - 74 131 73 58 75 - 79 83 48 35 75 - 79 78 47 31 80 - 84 34 21 13 80 - 84 51 29 22 85 - 89 12 6 6 85 - 89 19 11 8 90 - 94 13 5 8 90 - 94 10 9 1 95+ 6 4 2 95+ 12 7 5 2011 Population and Housing Census 3 Chapter 2: Population Structure Table 2.6 Population distribution by age Table 2.8 Population distribution by age group and sex, Mariental Rural group and sex, Rehoboth Rural Age group Total Female Male Age group Total Female Male Total 6 780 3 289 3 491 Total 7 591 3 362 4 229 0 - 4 867 447 420 0 - 4 901 457 444 5 - 9 760 373 387 5 - 9 841 394 447 10 - 14 796 387 409 10 - 14 749 379 370 15 - 19 657 313 344 15 - 19 614 267 347 20 - 24 618 291 327 20 - 24 671 254 417 25 - 29 583 281 302 25 - 29 549 219 330 30 - 34 444 203 241 30 - 34 475 173 302 35 - 39 399 180 219 35 - 39 438 184 254 40 - 44 329 140 189 40 - 44 397 157 240 45 - 49 317 161 156 45 - 49 362 140 222 50 - 54 263 129 134 50 - 54 386 177 209 55 - 59 207 92 115 55 - 59 331 149 182 60 - 64 174 93 81 60 - 64 299 130 169 65 - 69 134 67 67 65 - 69 200 97 103 70 - 74 102 51 51 70 - 74 154 69 85 75 - 79 65 38 27 75 - 79 110 59 51 80 - 84 31 19 12 80 - 84 57 22 35 85 - 89 17 11 6 85 - 89 27 19 8 90 - 94 12 10 2 90 - 94 17 9 8 95+ 5 3 2 95+ 13 7 6 Table 2.7 Population distribution by age Table 2.10 Population distribution by age group and sex, Mariental Urban group and sex, Rehoboth Urban West Age group Total Female Male Age group Total Female Male Total 15 254 7 365 7 889 Total 11 197 5 745 5 452 0 - 4 1 785 907 878 0 - 4 1 200 607 593 5 - 9 1 556 785 771 5 - 9 999 505 494 10 - 14 1 599 833 766 10 - 14 1 107 530 577 15 - 19 1 466 748 718 15 - 19 1 110 549 561 20 - 24 1 568 722 846 20 - 24 970 488 482 25 - 29 1 524 662 862 25 - 29 851 407 444 30 - 34 1 307 587 720 30 - 34 786 388 398 35 - 39 1 038 444 594 35 - 39 850 436 414 40 - 44 906 413 493 40 - 44 741 419 322 45 - 49 769 339 430 45 - 49 660 340 320 50 - 54 547 270 277 50 - 54 553 308 245 55 - 59 377 176 201 55 - 59 408 213 195 60 - 64 287 148 139 60 - 64 324 185 139 65 - 69 187 114 73 65 - 69 242 138 104 70 - 74 139 90 49 70 - 74 189 107 82 75 - 79 84 45 39 75 - 79 106 61 45 80 - 84 60 46 14 80 - 84 61 41 20 85 - 89 30 23 7 85 - 89 32 19 13 90 - 94 18 8 10 90 - 94 5 3 2 95+ 7 5 2 95+ 3 1 2 2011 Population and Housing Census 4 Chapter 2: Population Structure Table 2.9 Population distribution by age group and sex, Rehoboth Urban East Age group Total Female Male Total 18 035 9 191 8 844 0 - 4 2 152 1 015 1 137 5 - 9 1 852 949 903 10 - 14 1 872 881 991 15 - 19 1 892 986 906 20 - 24 1 870 910 960
Recommended publications
  • GUIDE to CIVIL SOCIETY in NAMIBIA 3Rd Edition
    GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA GUIDE TO 3Rd Edition 3Rd Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono and Naita Marowa PJ Rejoice Compiled by GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA 3rd Edition AN OVERVIEW OF THE MANDATE AND ACTIVITIES OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN NAMIBIA Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA COMPILED BY: Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono PUBLISHED BY: Namibia Institute for Democracy FUNDED BY: Hanns Seidel Foundation Namibia COPYRIGHT: 2018 Namibia Institute for Democracy. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means electronical or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission of the publisher. DESIGN AND LAYOUT: K22 Communications/Afterschool PRINTED BY : John Meinert Printing ISBN: 978-99916-865-5-4 PHYSICAL ADDRESS House of Democracy 70-72 Dr. Frans Indongo Street Windhoek West P.O. Box 11956, Klein Windhoek Windhoek, Namibia EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.nid.org.na You may forward the completed questionnaire at the end of this guide to NID or contact NID for inclusion in possible future editions of this guide Foreword A vibrant civil society is the cornerstone of educated, safe, clean, involved and spiritually each community and of our Democracy. uplifted. Namibia’s constitution gives us, the citizens and inhabitants, the freedom and mandate CSOs spearheaded Namibia’s Independence to get involved in our governing process. process. As watchdogs we hold our elected The 3rd Edition of the Guide to Civil Society representatives accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Record of 2019 Election Results
    Produced by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) Issue No 1: 2020 Your Record of 2019 Election Results These results are based on a spreadsheet received from the Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN) on February 20 2020 with the exception that a mistake made by the ECN concerning the Windhoek Rural constituency result for the Presidential election has been corrected. The mistake, in which the votes for Independent candidate and the UDF candidate had been transposed, was spotted by the IPPR and has been acknowledged by the ECN. National Assembly Results REGION & Constituency Registered APP CDV CoD LPM NDP NEFF NPF NUDO PDM RDP RP SWANU SWAPO UDF WRP Total Votes 2019 2014 Voters Cast Turnout Turnout ZAMBEZI 45303 Judea Lyaboloma 3122 12 12 8 3 47 4 1 5 169 12 9 3 1150 5 2 1442 46.19 62.86 Kabbe North 3782 35 20 5 20 30 8 2 5 224 17 8 8 1780 14 88 2264 59.86 73.17 Kabbe South 3662 16 10 6 13 20 3 3 3 97 9 6 1 1656 4 4 1851 50.55 72.47 Katima Mulilo Rural 6351 67 26 12 25 62 12 4 6 304 26 8 7 2474 16 3 3052 48.06 84.78 Katima Mulilo Urban 13226 94 18 24 83 404 23 10 18 1410 70 42 23 5443 30 12 7704 58.25 58.55 Kongola 5198 67 35 17 21 125 10 5 5 310 32 40 17 1694 22 5 2405 46.27 65.37 Linyanti 3936 22 17 7 4 150 4 2 5 118 84 4 4 1214 12 0 1647 41.84 70.61 Sibbinda 6026 27 27 17 13 154 9 2 6 563 42 11 9 1856 27 5 2768 45.93 55.23 23133 51.06 ERONGO 113633 Arandis 7894 74 27 21 399 37 159 6 60 1329 61 326 8 2330 484 20 5341 67.66 74.97 Daures 7499 39 29 2 87 11 13 12 334 482 43 20 80 1424 1010 18 3604 54.86 61.7 Karibib 9337 78 103
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of the Resettlement Programme on Sustainable
    THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAMME ON SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS OF SMALL – SCALE COMMERCIAL FARMERS IN MARIENTAL RURAL CONSTITUENCY OF THE HARDAP REGION, NAMIBIA A THESIS SUBMITED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF EDUCATION (ADULT EDUCATION) OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA BY JEFTA VATUNA NGAVETENE 2001 00 580 OCTOBER 2019 SUPERVISOR: DR M. HAMUNYELA I ABSTRACT At independence, Namibia was confronted with a skewed land tenure system where the minority owned vast productive land (Juach et al., 2013). To avoid losing land to dominant locals and rich occupants the government established the Ministry of Lands and Resettlement to be responsible for the process of land reform and resettlement. As a result, the resettlement programme was established to assist in addressing social injustices and to improve the lives of those who are encircled by poverty. A resettlement programme is a developmental approach aimed at the alleviation of poverty and to uplift people’s livelihoods. This study investigated the contribution of Land Reform and Resettlement Programme (LRRP) on sustainable livelihoods of small-scale livestock commercial farmers in the Mariental Rural Constituency of Hardap Region. The study used a case study design of the qualitative approach to capture the reality of the small-scale livestock commercial farmers’ lived experiences of and thoughts about the resettlement programme, its intended purpose and benefits to them. The study revealed that the programme beneficiaries have managed to accumulate assets they did not have before they were resettled. The researcher assessed the lives of resettled farmers and remarkable improvement was observed and tangible assets were evident.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Namibia State of the Region Address Hardap Region 28 July 2021, Mariental
    Republic of Namibia State of the Region Address Hardap Region 28 July 2021, Mariental The Governor HONOURABLE REVEREND SALOMON MENTHOS APRIL 1 Honorable Dausab, Chairperson of Hardap Regional Council Honorable Regional Councilors present Your Worship Kuhlmann, the Mayor of Mariental Municipality and All Local Authority Councilors present The Acting Chief Regional Officer All management cadres and representatives from all Line Ministries The Acting Regional Commander of the Namibian Police Officer in Charge of Hardap Correctional facilities Chief Executive Officers of All Local Authorities Distinguished Traditional Leaders Inhabitants of the Great Hardap Region Members of the Media Viewers and listeners on different media platforms Ladies and Gentlemen Honourable Chairperson, I would like to thank you for convening a Special Session of Council to allow us to execute the mandate entrusted upon us by Article 110A subsection (5) and (6) of the Constitution of the Republic of Namibia, to present a State of the Region Address (SoRA). In this report, I will present the following aspects crosscutting all sectors: Effective governance through improved community-based planning, tourism, agriculture, education, health, safety and security, gender and housing In order to promote Effective governance through Community Based Planning I held a meeting in May 2020, with the Constituency Councillors and the Local Authorities, to review annual budgets and development plans. A key outcome was that we need to pro-actively set long term development targets. 2 Similarly, external resource mobilisation, Public-Private-Partnership and revenue collection should be enhanced in good faith to improve livelihood of our fellow citizens. It was also emphasised that the needs and opportunities identified at local authority and constituency level, must inform the overall strategic plan of the Hardap Regional Council, in order to ensure bottom-up participatory planning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Georeferenced Digital Database for Sustainable Land Use Management in Namibia
    Environment and Ecology Research 4(6): 294-301, 2016 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/eer.2016.040602 The Georeferenced Digital Database for Sustainable Land Use Management in Namibia Lisho C. Mundia Department of Geo-spatial Sciences and Technology, Namibia University of Science and Technology, Namibia Copyright©2016 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract The article presents the empirical findings on georeferenced digital database were considered. This the georeferenced digital database for sustainable land use resulted in exploring the challenges and benefits associated management of the Hardap region, Namibia. The research with the georeferenced digital database in Namibia. signifies the continuous value of geographical data management for land use planning and management in 2. The Study Area (Hardap Region) Namibia. The research applied a combination of approaches that include literature review, Geographical Information After Namibia’s independence in 1990, the Hardap System (GIS), delineation of the imagery, Global region was divided into six political constituencies: Gibeon, Positioning Systems (GPS) and cartographic mapping. Both Mariental Rural, Mariental Urban, Rehoboth Rural, positive and negative impacts of the georeferenced digital Rehoboth Urban East and Rehoboth Urban West database for sustainable land use management were explored. (Government of Namibia [1]). In August 2013, the Hardap The research findings, among others, include the concepts, region was re-demarcated with two extra constituencies explanations, procedures and the value of the georeferenced (Aranos and Daweb) by the President after the fourth digital database towards sustainable land use management.
    [Show full text]
  • Tells It All 1 CELEBRATING 25 YEARS of DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS
    1989 - 2014 1989 - 2014 tells it all 1 CELEBRATING 25 YEARS OF DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS Just over 25 years ago, Namibians went to the polls Elections are an essential element of democracy, but for the country’s first democratic elections which do not guarantee democracy. In this commemorative were held from 7 to 11 November 1989 in terms of publication, Celebrating 25 years of Democratic United Nations Security Council Resolution 435. Elections, the focus is not only on the elections held in The Constituent Assembly held its first session Namibia since 1989, but we also take an in-depth look a week after the United Nations Special at other democratic processes. Insightful analyses of Representative to Namibia, Martii Athisaari, essential elements of democracy are provided by analysts declared the elections free and fair. The who are regarded as experts on Namibian politics. 72-member Constituent Assembly faced a We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the FOREWORD seemingly impossible task – to draft a constitution European Union (EU), Hanns Seidel Foundation, Konrad for a young democracy within a very short time. However, Adenaur Stiftung (KAS), MTC, Pupkewitz Foundation within just 80 days the constitution was unanimously and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) adopted by the Constituent Assembly and has been for their financial support which has made this hailed internationally as a model constitution. publication possible. Independence followed on 21 March 1990 and a quarter We would also like to thank the contributing writers for of a century later, on 28 November 2014, Namibians their contributions to this publication. We appreciate the went to the polls for the 5th time since independence to time and effort they have taken! exercise their democratic right – to elect the leaders of their choice.
    [Show full text]
  • WINDHOEK - 12 December 2018 No
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$58.20 WINDHOEK - 12 December 2018 No. 6791 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 340 Notification of application for registration as a political party: Electoral Act, 2014............................. 1 ________________ Government Notice ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF NAMIBIA No. 340 2018 NOTIFICATION OF APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS A POLITICAL PARTY: ELECTORAL ACT, 2014 In terms of subsection (7) of section 136 of the Electoral Act, 2014 (Act No. 5 of 2014), I give notice that - (a) the Landless People’s Movement, with abbreviated name LPM, has made an application for registration as a political party under subsection (1) of that section; (b) the list of the names and addresses of the office-bearers of the Landless People’s Movement is set out in Schedule 1; (c) the business address and postal address of the office which for the purposes of that Act is the office of the authorised representative of the political party is situated at 270 Chrisoperah Street, Khomasdal, Windhoek, P.O. Box 24491, Windhoek; (d) the names and voters’ registration numbers of the persons who have signed the declaration referred to in subsection (2)(d)(i) of that section are set out in Schedule 2; 2 Government Gazette 12 December 2018 6791 (e) the distinctive symbol, referred to in subsection (3)(f) of that section, of the Landless People’s Movement which may appear on the ballot paper, is set out in Schedule 3; (f) a registered political party or a person who wishes to object to the particulars referred to in paragraph (a) to (e) may, within 30 days from the date of publication of this notice, lodge an objection to any of the particulars setting forth the reasons for his or her objection to the office of the Electoral Commission, 67-71 Van Rhijn Street, Windhoek North, Khomas region, during office hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Goes to Vote 2015
    ProducedElection by the Institute for Public Policy Research W (IPPR)atch Issue No. 6 2015 NAMIBIA GOES TO VOTE 2015 FILL IN YOUR OWN RECORD OF THE REGIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITY ELECTIONS n November 27 2015 Namibians go to vote in the Regional Council and Local Authority elections. 95 constituencies will be contested in the Regional Council elections while 26 are uncontested meaning the sole candidate standing wins the Regional Council seat. 52 Local Authorities will be contested while five are uncontested. This edition of the Election Watch bulletinO lists all the regional council candidates (below) and the parties/organisations standing in the local authority elections. You can fill out the election results as they are announced in the spaces provided. Follow the fortunes of your party and candidates and see who will be elected. Constituency for Total number Political party/independent Votes per Regional Council in of votes Full names candidate candidate respect of a Region recorded ERONGO REGION Surname First names Arandis /Gawaseb Elijah Hage United Democratic Front of Namibia Imbamba Benitha Swapo Party of Namibia Prins Andreas Independent Candidate Daures !Haoseb Joram United Democratic Front of Namibia Katjiku Ehrnst Swapo Party of Namibia Ndjiharine Duludi Uahindua DTA of Namibia Rukoro Manfred Verikenda National Unity Democratic Organisation Karibib Ndjago Melania Swapo Party of Namibia Nguherimu Christiaan Rally for Democracy and Progress Tsamaseb Zedekias United Democratic Front of Namibia Omaruru Hamuntenya Johannes Tuhafeni
    [Show full text]
  • I~~I~ E a FD-992A-~N ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rte of the REPUBLIC of NAMIBIA
    Date Printed: 12/31/2008 JTS Box Number: lFES 14 Tab Number: 30 Document Title: GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA, R2,BO - NO 473, NO 25 Document Date: 1992 Document Country: NAM Document Language: ENG lFES ID: EL00103 F - B~I~~I~ E A FD-992A-~n ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rtE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA R2,80 WINDHOEK - I September 1992 No. 473 CONTENTS Page PROCLAMATION No. 25 Establishment of the boundaries of constituencies in Namibia ........ PROCLAMATION by the PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA No. 25 1992 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES IN NAMIBIA Under the powers vested in me by section 4(2)( a) of the Regional Councils Act, 1992 (Act 22 of 1992), I hereby make known the boundaries of constituencies which have been fixed by the Delimitation Commission under the provisions of Article 106(1) of the Namibian Constitution in respect of the regions referred to in Proclamation 6 of 1992. - Given under my Hand and the Seal of the RepUblic of Namibia at Windhoek this 29th day of August, One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-two. Sam Nujoma President BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT-IN-CABINET F Clifton White Resource Center International Foundation for Election Systems 2 Government Gazette I September 1992 No. 473 SCHEDULE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES REGION NO. I: KUNENE REGION compnsmg: Ruacana Constituency This Constituency is bounded on the north by the middle of the Kunene River from the said river's mouth upstream to the Ruacana Falls whence the boundary conforms with the demarcated international straight line east­ wards to Boundary Beacon 5; thence the boundary turns southwards and coincides with the straight line boundary common to the Kunene and Omusati Regions as far as line of latitude 18° S; thence along this line of latitude westwards to the Atlantic Ocean; thence along the line of the coast in a general northerly direction to the mouth of the Kunene River.
    [Show full text]
  • GGRETA Assessment Report Stampriet Aquifer
    United Nations International (GXFDWLRQDO6FLHQWL¿FDQG Hydrological Cultural Organization Programme TransboundaryStampriet Aquifer System Assessment Governance of Groundwater Resources in Transboundary Aquifers (GGRETA) - Phase 1 Technical Report Report prepared by the International Hydrological Programme of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. © UNESCO 2016 Pictures © UNESCO-IHP (Pictures taken by Pius Gsponer, Namibia Nature Foundation) Printed by UNESCO Printed in France 2016/SC/HYD/GGRETA-3 Transboundary Aquifer SystemStampriet Assessment Governance of Groundwater Resources in Transboundary Aquifers (GGRETA) - Phase 1 Technical Report Table of Contents Table of Contents Acronyms .......................................................................9 Executive Summary ............................................................11 Approach and main activities 11 Location, delineation and type of aquifer 11 General features of the Stampriet Transboundary Aquifer System (STAS) area 11 Water and water use in the area 12 The Stampriet Transboundary Aquifer System (STAS) 12 Main groundwater management challenges in the area 12 Improving groundwater governance 13 Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................15 1.1. General background 16 1.2. The GGRETA project 16 1.3. The Stampriet Transboundary Aquifer System pilot project 17 1.3.1 People and organisations involved 17 1.3.2 Project approach 18 1.3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • WELCOME ADDRESS by Governor S.S
    WELCOME ADDRESS by Governor S.S. Nuuyoma Erongo Region Governor S.S. Nuuyoma It is with the sense of deep gratitude and appreciation that I rise to speak to you today, at this very important gathering. I am particularly pleased to have been availed this opportunity to welcome all the distinguished guest to the great Erongo Region and in particular to the beautiful historic beach Town of Swakopmund. Having said that, allow me on behalf of Erongo Regional Council, the people of the great Erongo Region and of course on my own behalf to officially pronounce a warm welcome to all of you honourable members, most particularly the Right Honourable Prime Minister, Comrade Hage Geingob and all the dignity members from all the corners of the Republic of Namibia. Your presence here is held in a very high esteem. 1 The same heartfelt welcome is extended to all the distinguished guests. Your presence here is a token of solidarity and unity that embraces all of us together, to discuss and share knowledge and experiences at this Congress. Without your presence this Congress will be meaningless. Equally important, let me also on behalf of the people of the great Region register my gratitude and appreciation to the Management team of the Association of Regional Councils under the leadership of Honourable Governor and the President of the Association, Comrade John Pandeni for finding it fit to host the third Congress in our Region. I believe that the weather of the Atlantic Ocean which is uncharacteristic to many of you will give you a special treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia 2011 Population and Housing Census Preliminary Results
    REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA NAMIBIA 2011 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS PRELIMINARY RESULTS National Planning Commission Private Bag 13356 Windhoek April 2012 ISBN:978-99945-0-051-2 Namibia 2011 Population and Housing Census Preliminary Results National Planning Commission Private Bag 13356 Windhoek Tel: +264 61 283 4111 Fax: +264 61 239376 Website: www.npc.gov.na ADMINISTRATIVE MAP OF NAMIBIA i i Table of Contents ADMINISTRATIVE MAP OF NAMIBIA ....................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................... v LIST OF MAPS ....................................................................................................... vi LIST OF IMAGES .................................................................................................. vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................ viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................... xi LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................. xii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 7 1.1
    [Show full text]