DOCSLIB.ORG

Operative Part of the Verdict

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operative Part of the Verdict SUD BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE СУД БОСНЕ И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНЕ COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Case No.: X-KR-05/24-1 Date: Delivered 29 July 2008 Published 4 February 2009 Before: Judge Hilmo Vučinić, Presiding Judge Paul Melchior Brilman Judge Shireen Avis Fisher PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. PETAR MITROVIĆ FIRST INSTANCE VERDICT Counsel for the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mr. Ibro Bulić Mr. Kwai-Hong Ip Counsel for the Accused Petar Mitrović: Mr. Todor Todorović Ms. Vesna Tupajić-Škiljević TABLE OF CONTENTS VERDICT .................................................................................................................................7 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .........................................................................................................9 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS OF EVIDENCE.......................................................................11 A. Generally......................................................................................................................11 B. Credibility of S4...........................................................................................................12 1. Plea Agreements and Immunity Generally .........................................................12 2. Discrepancies between Investigative Statements ................................................14 3. Credibility of Facts ................................................................................................16 III. SUMMARY OF EVENTS ......................................................................................................17 A. Background and Summary of Events .......................................................................17 1. Preparation for Attack on Srebrenica .................................................................17 2. Attack on Srebrenica and Aftermath...................................................................18 3. Participation of RS MUP Units in the Aftermath...............................................21 4. Widespread and Systematic Attack .....................................................................23 5. Structure of the 2nd Šekovići Detachment............................................................24 B. Operations of the 2nd Šekovići Detachment and the 3rd Skelani Platoon...............25 1. 10 July – 11 July.....................................................................................................25 2. 12 July .....................................................................................................................26 3. 13 July: Sandići Meadow.......................................................................................27 4. 13 July: Kravica Warehouse.................................................................................28 5. 14 July – 15 July.....................................................................................................31 C. The Execution at the Kravica Warehouse ................................................................33 IV. LAW OF GENOCIDE ...........................................................................................................43 A. Elements of the Crime ................................................................................................43 B. Actus Reus ....................................................................................................................45 C. Mens Rea ......................................................................................................................45 1. Intent to Kill ..........................................................................................................46 2. Genocidal Intent.....................................................................................................47 a. “Aim” (“Intent”).................................................................................................47 b. “to Destroy” .......................................................................................................48 Case No. X-KR-05/24-1 2 29 July 2008 c. “In Whole or in Part” .........................................................................................48 d. “A national, ethnical, racial or religious group”................................................49 D. Proof of Genocidal Intent...........................................................................................49 E. Findings on Protected Group.....................................................................................50 1. The Accused knew that the Victims of the Killings at the Kravica Warehouse were Bosniaks from Srebrenica............................................................50 2. The Bosniaks of Srebrenica were a “Part” of a “Protected Group”.................51 V. GENOCIDAL PLAN AND CONTEXT – THE “LIBERATION” OF SREBRENICA ......................54 A. The “Liberation” of Srebrenica.................................................................................54 B. Phase One: Military Takeover of Srebrenica...........................................................55 C. “The Second Part”: Phase Two – Eradication of the Bosniaks..............................58 1. The Role of the Security and Intelligence Organs in Phase Two ......................60 2. The Role of the MUP forces in Phase Two ..........................................................61 D. Phase Two: Eradication of Bosniaks – Forcible Transfer.......................................62 1. Preparation for the Transfer Plan........................................................................62 2. The Deception.........................................................................................................64 E. Phase Two: Eradication of Bosniaks – Killing of the Men......................................66 1. Preparation for the Killing....................................................................................66 2. The Killing Plan: 12 July 1995..............................................................................69 a. The Killing Plan: Potočari..................................................................................70 b. The Killing Plan: The Column...........................................................................73 3. The Killing Plan: 13 July 1995..............................................................................78 a. Killing ................................................................................................................78 i. Ambush, Shelling, and Murder.....................................................................78 ii. Organized Multiple Killings........................................................................78 b. Induced Surrender..............................................................................................79 c. Transfer and Collection for Execution...............................................................80 d. Simultaneity .......................................................................................................80 4. The Killing Plan: 14 July – 19 July 1995 .............................................................81 5. No Deviation from the Killing Plan......................................................................82 F. Phase Two: Eradication of Bosniaks – The Decision to use the MUP Special Police to Implement the Plan Came From the Top .........................................84 1. The Order to Use the MUP Special Police came “From the Top” ....................85 2. Importance of the MUP Special Police ................................................................86 3.The Mission of the MUP came “From the Top” ..................................................88 a. Civilian Structures..............................................................................................88 b. Military Structures .............................................................................................89 Case No. X-KR-05/24-1 3 29 July 2008 4. Activities of the MUP were known “To the Top” ...............................................90 5. The Killings at Kravica were Consistent with the Plan “By the Top”..............92 G. Genocide was Committed in Srebrenica in Accordance with this Plan.................93 VI. THE ACCUSED – GENOCIDAL INTENT ..............................................................................96 A. The Accused knew the Basic Elements of the Genocidal Plan................................96 1. Timing .....................................................................................................................98 2. Content....................................................................................................................98 a. Content: Liberation of Srebrenica......................................................................98 i. Liberation of Srebrenica meant the Eradication of the Bosniaks .................98 ii. Eradication of the Bosniaks meant Killing the Men and Forcibly Transferring the Women, Children and Elderly ..............................................99 b. Content: The Order for Redeployment of the Platoon to Srebrenica to Assist in the Liberation came From the Top........................................................100 c. Content: The Details of the Detachment’s Part in the Liberation of Srebrenica were not to be Talked About..............................................................100 3. Manner..................................................................................................................101
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Nations
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-03-68-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 30 June 2006 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Original: English Former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Carmel Agius, Presiding Judge Hans Henrik Brydensholt Judge Albin Eser Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 30 June 2006 PROSECUTOR v. NASER ORIĆ JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Jan Wubben Ms. Patricia Viseur Sellers Mr. Gramsci Di Fazio Ms. JoAnne Richardson Mr. José Doria Counsel for the Accused: Ms. Vasvija Vidović Mr. John Jones Case No.: IT-03-68-T 30 June 2006 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. THE ACCUSED 1 B. SUMMARY OF THE CHARGES 2 1. Charges of Murder and Cruel Treatment 2 2. Charges of Wanton Destruction 3 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING EVALUATION OF THE EVIDENCE 5 A. GENERAL MATTERS REGARDING THE ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE 5 B. AUTHENTICITY OF EXHIBITS 8 1. Prosecution Objections to the Admission of Documents Tendered by the Defence 9 2. Defence Objections to the Admission of Documents Tendered by the Prosecution 9 (a) Objections Based on Lack or Insufficient Chain of Custody 9 (b) Objections to Exhibits Which Have not Been Presented to any Witness 11 (c) Objections Based on the Nature of the Document 11 i. Computer Files 11 ii. ‘Combat Action Information Sheets’ from the ABiH 2nd Corps 12 (d) Objections Based on the Source of the Document 12 i. Documents Provided by the Republika Srpska Liaison Office 12 ii. Documents Provided by Republika Srpska Bureau for Co-operation With the Tribunal 13 iii.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecution's Submission Pursuant to Rule 65
    IT-95-5/18-PT 18182 D 18182 - D 15860 18 May 2009 PvK UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 18 May 2009 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Iain Bonomy, Presiding Judge Christoph Flügge Judge Michèle Picard Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Alan Tieger Ms. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff The Accused: Radovan Karad`i} 18181 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) 1. Pursuant to the Trial Chamber’s order of 6 April 20091 and Rule 65 ter (E)(i)- (iii) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (“Rules), the Prosecution hereby files: (i) the final version of the Prosecutor's pre-trial brief (Appendix I); (ii) the confidential list of witnesses the Prosecutor intends to call (Appendix II); and (iii) the confidential list of exhibits the Prosecutor intends to offer into evidence (Appendix III). 2. Attached to Appendix I, the final pre-trial brief, are the following: - Confidential Attachment Detailing Events in the Municipalities: these set out the political background and events in the 27 municipalities;2 - Confidential Appendix A: Schedules A-G setting out additional particulars and the supporting evidence for the scheduled incidents; 1 Order Following on Status Conference and Appended Work Plan, 6 April 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Srebrenica - Intro ENG.Qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1
    srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 2 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Bridging the Gap conference in Srebrenica would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of many people and agencies. Our thanks to all those that made this remarkable series possible. Appreciation is expressed to the Helsinki Committee in Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Their commitment to truth-seeking and upholding basic human values, often in the face of hostility, is acknowledged. The event was generously supported by the Neighbourhood Programme of the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Heartfelt appreciation is extended to those people most affected by the crimes addressed at the conference. Without their bravery, nothing could be accomplished. ii Bridging the Gap between the ICTY and communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 A publication of the Communications Service, Registry, ICTY Contents Editor: Liam McDowall Graphics Editor: Leslie Hondebrink-Hermer Contributors: Ernesa Begi}-Ademagi}, Rebecca Cuthill, Matias Hellman, James Landale, Natalie O’Brien Printed by Albani drukkers, The Hague, Netherlands 2009 SREBRENICA srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 3 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Table of contents Map
    [Show full text]
  • Miroslav Deronjic, “Bearing in Mind His Genuine Remorse Expressed on Numerous Occasions During His Contacts with OTP Investigators”.521
    Case No.: IT-02-61-S 30 March 2004 UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-02-61-S Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 30 March 2004 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Wolfgang Schomburg, Presiding Judge Carmel A. Agius Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 30 March 2004 PROSECUTOR v. MIROSLAV DERONJI] SENTENCING JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Mark B. Harmon Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Slobodan Cvijeti} Mr. Slobodan Ze~evi} Case No.: IT-02-61-S 30 March 2004 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. THE ACCUSED.................................................................................................................................. 2 III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ............................................................................................................. 4 A. OVERVIEW OF THE PROCEEDINGS ....................................................................................................... 4 B. PLEA AGREEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 6 C. TESTIMONY OF THE ACCUSED............................................................................................................. 7 D. SENTENCING HEARING
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER (Exclusively for the Use of the Media
    JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) United Nations The Hague, 30 June 2006 Nations Unies PROSECUTOR V. NASER ORIĆ SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENT International Please find below the summary of the judgement today read out by Judge Agius: Criminal Tribunal for the former Introduction Yugoslavia Tribunal Pénal Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia is sitting today to International pour deliver its Judgement in the trial of Naser Orić. l’ex-Yougoslavie This case deals with crimes of murder and cruel treatment of prisoners and of wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages alleged to have happened in Srebrenica in 1992 and 1993 for which the Accused was indicted on 13 March 2003. The Accused stood trial for the following charges: first, under COUNT 1, he is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute of the Tribunal (“Statute”) for murder as a violation of the laws or customs of war pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute. Under COUNT 2, the Accused is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute for cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute. The Prosecution never alleged that these crimes of murder and cruel treatment were committed by the Accused, but only accused him pursuant to Article 7(3) of the Statute as being responsible for these crimes committed by his subordinates whilst he was holding a position of superior authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina O O Indictment
    Sud £¡H / Cyfl GnX Kfivicno cdjeljenje ¡ Apelaciono odjeljenj«/ KpMBKSHo cftjejo€hbe K Ane/ia^hoHO OAfefbert* Odjcl I i Oc je III / Ofljs/i I * Ofl|»/i II Odsjek za sudsfcu upravu/Oflejes 33 cy/^cicy ynpsoy BOSNIA AND HERZEGO PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BIH fflGWJ) U^/vfA q^ SARAJEVO Number: KT-RZ-10/05 Sarajevo, 12 December 2005 COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - Preliminary Hearing Judge - Pursuant to Article 35 (2) (h) and Article 226 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code of BiH, I hereby issue the O INDICTMENT AGAINST: 1. STUPAR MILOS, a.k.a. "MISO", son of Slavojka (maiden name Ninic), born 7 December 1963 in TiSci, Sekovici where he is holding permanent residence, of Serb ethnicity, citizen of BiH, police officer, married, father of four children, served the Army in 1982 in Nis, average financial situation, with no previous conviction, criminal proceedings are being conducted against him for a criminal offence of light bodily injury, currently under custody by the Decision of the Court of BiH number: X-KRN-05/25 to last until 22 December 2005 at 11:00 hrs, 2. TRIFUNOVlt MILENKO, a.k.a "COP", son of Ivan and Milojka Obradovic, O born 7 January 1968 in the village of Kostolomci, Srebrenica Municipality, residing in Skelani bb in his private house, of Serb ethnicity, citizen of BiH, JMBG: 0701967183154, trader, unemployed, completed Vocational Trade School, married, father of two minor children, expecting a newborn child, served the Army in 1987 in Pec and Prizren, with no military rank or medal, registered in military records of Srebrenica, indigent financial situation, no other criminal proceedings are being conducted against him, with no previous conviction, currently under custody by the Decision of the Court of BiH to last until 22 December 2005 at 11:00 hrs, 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 173 /20 Sarajevo,12.6.2020.Godine Na Osnovu Člana 56. Zakona O
    Bosna i Hercegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERALNO MINISTARSTVO RASELJENIH MINISTRY OF DISPLACED PERSONS AND OSOBA I IZBJEGLICA REFUGEES OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Broj: 03-32-3-65- 173 /20 Sarajevo,12.6.2020.godine Na osnovu člana 56. Zakona o organizaciji organa uprave u Federaciji BiH („Službene novine Federacije BiH“ broj:35/05), člana 22. Pravilnika o unutrašnjoj organizaciji Federalnog ministarstva raseljenih osoba i izbjeglica, broj: 02-02-1967-11/18 od 04. mart 2019. godine, a u vezi sa objavljenim Javnim pozivom za refundiranje troškova poreza I doprinosa za uposlene povratnike na području entiteta Republika Srpska, broj: 03-32-3-65-1/20 od 14.4.2020. godine, a u skladu sa Procedurama za izbor potencijalnih učesnika u programu pomoći za refundiranje troškova poreza i doprinosa za uposlene povratnike na području entiteta Republika Srpska, broj: 03-32-3-65-2-2/20 od 22.5.2020.godine, na prijedlog Komisije za razmatranje prijava, imenovane Rješenjem broj: 03-32-3- 65-2/20 od 20.4.2020. godine, federalni ministar raseljenih osoba i izbjeglica, d o n o s i O D L U K U O UTVRĐIVANJU LISTE POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA POMOĆI po Javnom pozivu za refundiranje troškova poreza i doprinosa za uposlene povratnike na području entiteta Republika Srpska I Ovom odlukom vrši se ocjenjivanje prijavljenih kandidata po osnovu ispunjavanja/neispunjavanja uslova za učešće u programu refundiranja troškova poreza i doprinosa za uposlene povratnike na području entiteta Republika Srpska . II Lista potencijalnih korisnika pomoći koji ispunjavaju uslove iz Javnog poziva, raspoređeni prema općinama implementacije projekta, kako slijedi: ISPUNJENOST RED.BR.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Remains and Identification
    Human remains and identification HUMAN REMAINS AND VIOLENCE Human remains and identification Human remains Human remains and identification presents a pioneering investigation into the practices and methodologies used in the search for and and identification exhumation of dead bodies resulting from mass violence. Previously absent from forensic debate, social scientists and historians here Mass violence, genocide, confront historical and contemporary exhumations with the application of social context to create an innovative and interdisciplinary dialogue. and the ‘forensic turn’ Never before has a single volume examined the context of motivations and interests behind these pursuits, each chapter enlightening the Edited by ÉLISABETH ANSTETT political, social, and legal aspects of mass crime and its aftermaths. and JEAN-MARC DREYFUS The book argues that the emergence of new technologies to facilitate the identification of dead bodies has led to a ‘forensic turn’, normalizing exhumations as a method of dealing with human remains en masse. However, are these exhumations always made for legitimate reasons? And what can we learn about societies from the way in which they deal with this consequence of mass violence? Multidisciplinary in scope, this book presents a ground-breaking selection of international case studies, including the identification of corpses by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, the resurfacing ANSTETTand of human remains from the Gulag and the sites of Jewish massacres from the Holocaust. Human remains
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Address: Press
    Press Release . Communiqué de presse (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) United Nations REGISTRY Nations Unies GREFFE The Hague, 11 April 2003 J.L./ P.I.S. / 745e ARREST AND TRANSFER OF NASER ORI] International Criminal Tribunal for the former On Thursday 10 April 2003, SFOR forces arrested Naser Ori} in Tuzla, Bosnia and Yugoslavia Herzegovina. The accused was transferred to the Detention Unit of the International Criminal Tribunal Pénal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia the following day. International pour l’ex-Yougoslavie The Indictment against Naser Ori} was confirmed on 28 March 2003. According to the Indictment, Naser Ori} (born on 3 March 1967 in Poto~ari, municipality of Srebrenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina) was the Commander of the forces of the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina (ABiH) in the Srebrenica area in Eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Indictment states that, “by virtue of his position and authority as Commander, Naser Ori} commanded all units that were operating within his area of his responsibility. This includes all units involved in combat activities in the municipality of Srebrenica and Bratunac, in particular the combat activities in Rupovo Brdo on 10 June 1992, Ratkovi}i on 21 and 27 June 1992, Je`estica on 8 August 1992, Fakovi}i on 5 October 1992, Bjelovac between 14 and 19 December 1992 and Kravica on 7 and 8 January 1993 and all units including the Military Police involved in the detention and custody of Serb individuals in Srebrenica ”. The Indictment alleges that, between 24 September 1992 and 20 March 1993, members of the Military Police under the command and control of Naser Ori} detained several Serb individuals in the Srebrenica Police Station and in the building behind the Srebrenica Municipal Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina Verdict
    SUD BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE СУД БОСНЕ И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНЕ COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Case No.: X-KR-07/430 Date: Delivered 29 June 2009 Published 14 September 2009 Before: Judge Tihomir Lukes, Presiding Judge Carol Peralta Judge David Re PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. FERID HODŽIĆ VERDICT Counsel for the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Ms. Sanja Jukić, Prosecutor Counsel for Ferid Hodžić: Mr. Asim Crnalić, Lawyer INDEX TO VERDICT A. OPERATIVE PROVISION ................................................................................3 B. REASONING .......................................................................................................6 The indictment .........................................................................................................6 Existence of an armed conflict................................................................................7 Detention of prisoners in a stable in Rovaši ..........................................................9 Breaches of Article 3 (1) (a) and (c) of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Articles 173 and 175 of the Criminal Code of BiH – beatings and mistreatment of the prisoners.......................................................................................................13 Torture................................................................................................................16 Death of Dušan Čestić........................................................................................18 Applicability of Article 121
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Crimes and Bias-Motivated Incidents in Bosnia and Herzegovina: 2015 Monitoring Findings of the OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Hate Crimes and Bias-Motivated Incidents in Bosnia and Herzegovina: 2015 Monitoring Findings of the OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina 16 November 2016 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Legislative Developments ............................................................................................... 4 2. Collection of Data/Statistical Information ...................................................................... 4 3. Overview of Incidents and Authorities’ Responses ........................................................ 5 3.1. Judicial Cases ............................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Instances of Incidents in 2015 .................................................................................. 7 3.3 Key Findings ............................................................................................................. 10 3.4 Responses .................................................................................................................. 11 4. Governmental and Non-governmental Initiatives to Combat Hate Crimes .................. 12 4.1. Governmental Initiatives ........................................................................................ 12 4.2. Non-governmental Initiatives ................................................................................. 12 4.3. Social Media Outreach ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LOKACIJE BIRAČKIH MJESTA - Lokalni Izbori 2020
    LOKACIJE BIRAČKIH MJESTA - Lokalni izbori 2020. godine Na označenim KOD biračkim mjestima, Vrsta Birackog KOD Grad/Opština Birackog Naziv Birackog Mjesta Lokacija Birackog Mjesta svoje biračko pravo Mjesta Mjesta mogu ostvariti i birači koji glasaju: 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A001 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 1 PRVA OSNOVNA ŠKOLA LIČNO/OSOBNO 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A002A REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 2A GIMNAZIJA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A002B REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 2B GIMNAZIJA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A003 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 3 GIMNAZIJA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A004 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 4 GIMNAZIJA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A005 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 5 DRUGA SREDNJA ŠKOLA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A006 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 6 OŠ 25. NOVEMBAR 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A007 REDOVNO ZAGRAD DRUGA SREDNJA ŠKOLA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A008A REDOVNO TRNOVIA OŠ TRNOVI 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A008B REDOVNO TRNOVIB OŠ TRNOVI 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A009A REDOVNO POLJEA OŠ POLJE 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A009B REDOVNO POLJEB OŠ POLJE 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A010 REDOVNO GRAHOVO OŠ GRAHOVO Na označenim KOD biračkim mjestima, Vrsta Birackog KOD Grad/Opština Birackog Naziv Birackog Mjesta Lokacija Birackog Mjesta svoje biračko pravo Mjesta Mjesta mogu ostvariti i birači koji glasaju: 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A011 REDOVNO DONJA VIDOVSKA OŠ DONJA VIDOVSKA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A012A REDOVNO ŠUMATACA OŠ ŠUMATAC 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A012B REDOVNO ŠUMATACB OŠ ŠUMATAC 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A013 REDOVNO ŠABIĆI PRIVATNI PROSTOR ŠABIĆ SEAD 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A014A REDOVNO KUDIĆIA OŠ KUDIĆI 001 VELIKA
    [Show full text]