DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations Judgement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations Judgement UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-02-60-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 17 January 2005 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER I, SECTION A Before: Judge Liu Daqun, Presiding Judge Volodymyr Vassylenko Judge Carmen Maria Argibay Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 17 January 2005 PROSECUTOR v. VIDOJE BLAGOJEVI] DRAGAN JOKI] JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Peter McCloskey Mr. Stefan Waespi Ms. Antoinette Issa Mr. Milbert Shin Mr. Salvador Viada Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Michael Karnavas and Ms. Suzana Tomanovi} for Vidoje Blagojevi} Mr. Miodrag Stojanovi} and Mr. Branko Lukić for Dragan Joki} Case No.: IT-02-60-T 17 January 2005 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. VIDOJE BLAGOJEVIĆ ....................................................................................................................1 1. The Accused.............................................................................................................................1 2. Overview of the Case against Vidoje Blagojević ....................................................................2 B. DRAGAN JOKIĆ.............................................................................................................................4 1. The Accused.............................................................................................................................4 2. Overview of the Case against Dragan Jokić ............................................................................4 II. PRELIMINARY FACTUAL FINDINGS ..................................................................................7 A. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE ..................................7 B. MILITARY AND CIVILIAN STRUCTURES RELEVANT TO THIS CASE ..............................................12 1. Armed Forces of the Republika Srpska .................................................................................12 (a) Structure of the Main Staff of the VRS.................................................................................. 13 (b) Structure of the Drina Corps .................................................................................................. 14 (c) Structure of the Bratunac Brigade.......................................................................................... 15 (i) Brigade command............................................................................................................. 16 a. Security and Intelligence ................................................................................................. 17 b. Rear Services (Logistics)................................................................................................. 18 c. Morale, Legal and Religious Affairs ............................................................................... 19 (ii) Infantry Battalions ............................................................................................................ 19 (iii) Military Police of the Bratunac Brigade........................................................................... 23 (d) Structure of the Zvornik Brigade ........................................................................................... 23 (i) Command Structure and Units.......................................................................................... 23 (ii) Structure of the Engineering Company ............................................................................ 25 (e) The MUP................................................................................................................................27 (i) Regular Police Force......................................................................................................... 27 (ii) Special Police Brigade...................................................................................................... 28 (iii) Re-subordination to the VRS in July 1995....................................................................... 28 2. Civilian Structures in Bratunac..............................................................................................31 (a) Municipal Authorities ............................................................................................................ 31 (b) Department of Defence .......................................................................................................... 31 (c) Civilian Protection.................................................................................................................. 32 C. FACTUAL BACKGROUND RELEVANT TO THIS CASE....................................................................35 1. 1991-1994 ..............................................................................................................................35 2. Plans to “Defeat” the Srebrenica Enclave..............................................................................38 3. Events in and around Srebrenica from January to July 1995.................................................39 4. Srebrenica in July 1995..........................................................................................................43 (a) 2 July – 6 July 1995 ............................................................................................................... 44 (b) 6 to 11 July 1995.................................................................................................................... 45 (c) Srebrenica Following the Take-over ...................................................................................... 49 5. Conclusions and Findings related to the Role of the Bratunac Brigade ................................50 D. THE BOSNIAN MUSLIMS FOLLOWING THE FALL OF SREBRENICA ...............................................51 1. Potočari ..................................................................................................................................51 (a) Civilians Flee from Srebrenica to Potočari ............................................................................ 51 (b) Conditions in Potočari............................................................................................................ 53 (c) Negotiations related to the Refugees in Potočari ................................................................... 55 (d) Atmosphere in Potočari and Intimidation by VRS forces...................................................... 60 (e) Separations of Men from Women, Children and Elderly....................................................... 63 (f) The Transport of the Civilian Population out of Potočari ...................................................... 68 (g) Killings in Potočari ................................................................................................................ 73 (h) Potočari: 16-17 July ............................................................................................................... 75 (i) Conclusions and Findings related to the Role of the Bratunac Brigade ................................. 76 2. The Column ...........................................................................................................................80 (a) 10-16 July 1995...................................................................................................................... 80 (i) Searching the Terrain........................................................................................................ 80 (ii) Specific Incidents related to the Men Detained 12-15 July.............................................. 88 a. Killings along the Konjević Polje-Nova Kasaba road..................................................... 88 b. Sandići meadow .............................................................................................................. 88 c. The Warehouse at the Konjević Polje Intersection ......................................................... 90 d. Interrogation at Konjević Polje Checkpoint.................................................................... 92 e. Nova Kasaba.................................................................................................................... 93 f. Detention near the Kravica supermarket.......................................................................... 95 (b) Detention and killings after 17 July ....................................................................................... 95 (i) 18-19 July 1995 – Capture and Execution in the area of Baljkovica near Nezuk............ 95 (c) Conclusions and Findings related to the Role of the Bratunac Brigade................................. 96 E. DETENTION AND KILLINGS IN BRATUNAC TOWN ........................................................................98 1. General situation in Bratunac town........................................................................................98 2. Detention in buses in Bratunac town .....................................................................................99 3. Detention and killings in and around the Vuk Karad`ić School on 12 and 13 July 1995 ...100 4. Transport of prisoners from Bratunac to the Zvornik area - 13 to 15 July ..........................106 5. Conclusions and Findings related to the Role of the Bratunac Brigade ..............................107
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1.4. United Nations Peacekeeping in Bosnia and Herzegovina ...56
    UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL The United Nations Peacekeepers and Local Population of the United Nations Safe Area Srebrenica: (De) Construction of Human Relationships DISSERTATION Tea Rozman – Clark Mentor: Prof. Dr. Mirjam Milharčič - Hladnik Nova Gorica 2014 CONTENTS CONTENTS....................................................................................................................... 2 List of Photographs .................................................................................................... 4 List of Narrators ......................................................................................................... 7 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 8 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................... 9 Notes on Transliteration ........................................................................................... 12 List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................... 14 Preamble .................................................................................................................. 20 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 24 Theoretical Framework: ................................................................................................ 28 Memory Studies ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-03-68-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 30 June 2006 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Original: English Former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Carmel Agius, Presiding Judge Hans Henrik Brydensholt Judge Albin Eser Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 30 June 2006 PROSECUTOR v. NASER ORIĆ JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Jan Wubben Ms. Patricia Viseur Sellers Mr. Gramsci Di Fazio Ms. JoAnne Richardson Mr. José Doria Counsel for the Accused: Ms. Vasvija Vidović Mr. John Jones Case No.: IT-03-68-T 30 June 2006 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. THE ACCUSED 1 B. SUMMARY OF THE CHARGES 2 1. Charges of Murder and Cruel Treatment 2 2. Charges of Wanton Destruction 3 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING EVALUATION OF THE EVIDENCE 5 A. GENERAL MATTERS REGARDING THE ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE 5 B. AUTHENTICITY OF EXHIBITS 8 1. Prosecution Objections to the Admission of Documents Tendered by the Defence 9 2. Defence Objections to the Admission of Documents Tendered by the Prosecution 9 (a) Objections Based on Lack or Insufficient Chain of Custody 9 (b) Objections to Exhibits Which Have not Been Presented to any Witness 11 (c) Objections Based on the Nature of the Document 11 i. Computer Files 11 ii. ‘Combat Action Information Sheets’ from the ABiH 2nd Corps 12 (d) Objections Based on the Source of the Document 12 i. Documents Provided by the Republika Srpska Liaison Office 12 ii. Documents Provided by Republika Srpska Bureau for Co-operation With the Tribunal 13 iii.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecution's Submission Pursuant to Rule 65
    IT-95-5/18-PT 18182 D 18182 - D 15860 18 May 2009 PvK UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 18 May 2009 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Iain Bonomy, Presiding Judge Christoph Flügge Judge Michèle Picard Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Alan Tieger Ms. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff The Accused: Radovan Karad`i} 18181 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) 1. Pursuant to the Trial Chamber’s order of 6 April 20091 and Rule 65 ter (E)(i)- (iii) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (“Rules), the Prosecution hereby files: (i) the final version of the Prosecutor's pre-trial brief (Appendix I); (ii) the confidential list of witnesses the Prosecutor intends to call (Appendix II); and (iii) the confidential list of exhibits the Prosecutor intends to offer into evidence (Appendix III). 2. Attached to Appendix I, the final pre-trial brief, are the following: - Confidential Attachment Detailing Events in the Municipalities: these set out the political background and events in the 27 municipalities;2 - Confidential Appendix A: Schedules A-G setting out additional particulars and the supporting evidence for the scheduled incidents; 1 Order Following on Status Conference and Appended Work Plan, 6 April 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Srebrenica - Intro ENG.Qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1
    srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 2 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Bridging the Gap conference in Srebrenica would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of many people and agencies. Our thanks to all those that made this remarkable series possible. Appreciation is expressed to the Helsinki Committee in Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Their commitment to truth-seeking and upholding basic human values, often in the face of hostility, is acknowledged. The event was generously supported by the Neighbourhood Programme of the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Heartfelt appreciation is extended to those people most affected by the crimes addressed at the conference. Without their bravery, nothing could be accomplished. ii Bridging the Gap between the ICTY and communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 A publication of the Communications Service, Registry, ICTY Contents Editor: Liam McDowall Graphics Editor: Leslie Hondebrink-Hermer Contributors: Ernesa Begi}-Ademagi}, Rebecca Cuthill, Matias Hellman, James Landale, Natalie O’Brien Printed by Albani drukkers, The Hague, Netherlands 2009 SREBRENICA srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 3 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Table of contents Map
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Normative Gaps in Transitional Justice: the Serbian Discourse on the Srebrenica Declaration 20101
    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 11, No 4, 2012, 127-156 Copyright © ECMI 2013 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/2012/Mehler.pdf Understanding Normative Gaps in Transitional Justice: The Serbian Discourse on the Srebrenica Declaration 20101 Daniela Mehler* Friedrich Schiller University The Serbian government has often been accused of “double-speak” in confronting crimes that took place during the Yugoslav war. This behaviour is interpreted as a gap between an underdeveloped domestic norm of facing the past and the international norm of transitional justice. This paper argues that “normative gaps” are no contradiction to the transnational norm socialization process, but to the rule itself. By applying methods of discourse analysis, the 2010 Serbian parliamentary debate on the declaration condemning the 1995 massacre of Srebrenica is used as an extensive case study showing how domestic actors use concepts of facing the past. Keywords: norm socialization, transitional justice, facing the past, Serbia, Srebrenica, conditionality 1. Introduction Until recently, Serbia was not regarded as having confronted its war-time past in an appropriate manner. However, under President Boris Tadić (2004-2012) Serbia made veritable progress in its cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and symbolic politics. Tadić supported a symbolic policy of facing the past and reconciliation that was warmly welcomed by the international community, although his successor, President Tomislav Nikolić, has since adopted another line. Only days after his electoral success the latter stated that Serbia should be acquitted of a past in which nobody could live.
    [Show full text]
  • Miroslav Deronjic, “Bearing in Mind His Genuine Remorse Expressed on Numerous Occasions During His Contacts with OTP Investigators”.521
    Case No.: IT-02-61-S 30 March 2004 UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-02-61-S Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 30 March 2004 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Wolfgang Schomburg, Presiding Judge Carmel A. Agius Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 30 March 2004 PROSECUTOR v. MIROSLAV DERONJI] SENTENCING JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Mark B. Harmon Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Slobodan Cvijeti} Mr. Slobodan Ze~evi} Case No.: IT-02-61-S 30 March 2004 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. THE ACCUSED.................................................................................................................................. 2 III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ............................................................................................................. 4 A. OVERVIEW OF THE PROCEEDINGS ....................................................................................................... 4 B. PLEA AGREEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 6 C. TESTIMONY OF THE ACCUSED............................................................................................................. 7 D. SENTENCING HEARING
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER (Exclusively for the Use of the Media
    JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) United Nations The Hague, 30 June 2006 Nations Unies PROSECUTOR V. NASER ORIĆ SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENT International Please find below the summary of the judgement today read out by Judge Agius: Criminal Tribunal for the former Introduction Yugoslavia Tribunal Pénal Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia is sitting today to International pour deliver its Judgement in the trial of Naser Orić. l’ex-Yougoslavie This case deals with crimes of murder and cruel treatment of prisoners and of wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages alleged to have happened in Srebrenica in 1992 and 1993 for which the Accused was indicted on 13 March 2003. The Accused stood trial for the following charges: first, under COUNT 1, he is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute of the Tribunal (“Statute”) for murder as a violation of the laws or customs of war pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute. Under COUNT 2, the Accused is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute for cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute. The Prosecution never alleged that these crimes of murder and cruel treatment were committed by the Accused, but only accused him pursuant to Article 7(3) of the Statute as being responsible for these crimes committed by his subordinates whilst he was holding a position of superior authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Javni Poziv Fmroi 2019 – Konačna Rang Lista Potencijalnih Korisnika Za Rekonstrukciju Stambenih Objekata – Grad Bijeljina
    JAVNI POZIV FMROI 2019 – KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA ZA REKONSTRUKCIJU STAMBENIH OBJEKATA – GRAD BIJELJINA Red.br. Ime i prezime Adresa sanacije/Sadašnja adresa Broj bodova 1. Kasić (Mujo) Avdulaziz Braće Lazić 227, Bijeljina 220 Braće Lazić 227, Bijeljina 2. Alijević (Ruždija) Šefik Nikole Tesle 23, Bijeljina 210 1. maj 31, Janja 3. Bilalić (Mehmed) Vahidin Drinska 107, Janja 210 Drinska 107, Janja 4. Halilović Admir Mehmed N.Tesle bb Bijeljina 200 Mula Alije Sadikovića 21 Bijeljina 5. Krivić (Ramo) Enes Dž. Bijedića 15, Bijeljina 200 Dž. Bijedića 15, Bijeljina 6. Krilašević (Osman) Mevludin I.L. Ribara 15, Bijeljina 200 Bobarovača 15, Bijeljina 7. Osmanović (Zinija) Adi Jurija Gagarina 39, Bijeljina 200 Jurija Gagarina 39, Bijeljina 8. Sivčević (Ohran) Osman Đorđa Vasića 41, Janja 200 Brzava 77, Janja 9. Spahić (Nedžib) Mensur Braće Lazić 203, Bijeljina 190 Braće Lazić 203, Bijeljina 10. Alibegović (Ibrahim) Sakib M.M. Dizdara 63, Bijeljina 190 M.M. Dizdara 63, Bijeljina 11. Pobrklić (Jusuf) Mensur Braće Lazić bb, Janja 180 Dž. Bijedića 36, Janja 12. Hrustić (Omer) Sead 24. Septembar 14, Bijeljina 180 24. Septembar 14, Bijeljina 13. Godušić (Ragib) Nešat M.M. Dizdara 19A, Bijeljina 180 M.M. Dizdara 19A, Bijeljina 14. Demirović (Emin) Mustafa Desanke Maksimović 46, Bijeljina 180 Desanke Maksimović 46, Bijeljina 15. Karjašević (Huso) Ahmed Mlade Bosne 5, Bijeljina 180 Mlade Bosne 5, Bijeljina 16. Tuzlaković (Muhamed) Emir Miloša Obilića 104, Bijeljina 180 Miloša Obilića 106, Bijeljina 17. Bajrić (Alija) Mujo D. Tucovića 32, Bijeljina 180 D. Tucovića 32, Bijeljina 18. Osmanagić (Mustafa) Omer Brzava 119, Bijeljina 170 Brzava 119, Bijeljina 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Komponenta: Zapošljavanje Kod Poslodavaca PREGLED
    Komponenta: Zapošljavanje kod poslodavaca PREGLED POSLODAVACA KOJIMA SU ODOBRENA SREDSTVA PO PROGRAMU ZAPOŠLJAVANJA I SAMOZAPOŠLJAVANJA CILJNIH KATEGORIJA U PRIVREDI U 2021.GODINI NA SJEDNICI UPRAVNOG ODBORA OD 21.05.2021.GODINA ODOBRENO Rb. Biro Filijala Naziv pravnog lica LICA 1 Biro Han Pijesak Istocno Sarajevo "RSC PROMET" d.o.o. 1 2 Biro Zvornik Zvornik Gostionica ''SAČ'' Marica Đokić s.p. Zvornik 1 3 Biro Zvornik Zvornik "SIGMA" Darko Božić s.p. Trnovica 1 4 Biro Modriča Doboj Zanatska radnja "DDD" Boro Đuran s.p. Kužnjača 1 5 Biro Modriča Doboj ''MAVEGO'' Marina Đuran, s.p. Modriča 1 6 Biro Šipovo Banja Luka Mesnica ,,Vitorog,,Milanka Pastir,s.p.Šipovo 1 7 Biro Šipovo Banja Luka ,,MB. MILMAX,, DOO 1 8 Biro Sokolac Istocno Sarajevo "Štamparija" Mile Šuka s.p. Sokolac 1 Zanatska radnja "TOPLOMONT" Mladen Trivić s.p. 9 Biro Čelinac Banja Luka 1 Crni Vrh 10 Biro I. N. Sarajevo Istocno Sarajevo D.O.O. "MAHAGONI" Istočno Novo Sarajevo 2 11 Biro Banja Luka Banja Luka ,,GEO-PLAN'' - FADžAN SALIH s.p. 2 12 Biro Banja Luka Banja Luka "GMP KOMPANI" d.o.o. Banja Luka 1 13 Biro Vlasenica Zvornik JKP "Vlasenica" d.o.o. Vlasenica 15 Zanatsko trgovinska radnja "JASEN" Zdenko Sekulović 14 Biro Foča Trebinje 2 s.p. Foča 15 Biro Foča Trebinje Trgovinska radnja "Agro-trade" Dejan Kapuran s.p. Foča 1 Ugostiteljska radnja "KELT PUB" Žarko Perišić s.p. 16 Biro Foča Trebinje 1 Foča 17 Biro Foča Trebinje Konoba "Zlatna dunja-M" Ljilja Vasović s.p. Foča 2 18 Biro Foča Trebinje "FALCON" d.o.o.
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliografija Doktorskih Disertacija
    Prirodno-matematički fakultet Biljana Stojanović BIBLIOGRAFIJA DOKTORSKIH DISERTACIJA, MAGISTARSKIH, MASTER I DIPLOMSKIH RADOVA ODBRANJENIH NA ODSJEKU ZA GEOGRAFIJU PRIRODNO-MATEMATIČKOG FAKULTETA UNIVERZITETA U SARAJEVU U PERIODU 1954-2016. GODINE Sarajevo, 2017. Prirodno-matematički fakultet Biljana Stojanović BIBLIOGRAFIJA DOKTORSKIH DISERTACIJA, MAGISTARSKIH, MASTER I DIPLOMSKIH RADOVA ODBRANJENIH NA ODSJEKU ZA GEOGRAFIJU PRIRODNO-MATEMATIČKOG FAKULTETA UNIVERZITETA U SARAJEVU U PERIODU 1954-2016. GODINE Sarajevo, 2017. Naziv djela: BIBLIOGRAFIJA DOKTORSKIH DISERTACIJA, MAGISTARSKIH, MASTER I DIPLOMSKIH RADOVA ODBRANJENIH NA ODSJEKU ZA GEOGRAFIJU PRIRODNO- MATEMATIČKOG FAKULTETA UNIVERZITETA U SARAJEVU U PERIODU 1954- 2016. GODINE Priredila i sastavila: Biljana Stojanović, bibliotekar Izdavač: Prirodno-matematički fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu Štampa: Coronʼs d.o.o - Sarajevo Godina izdanja i štampanja: 2017. godina -------------------------------------------------------- CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 013:[378.245:91(497.6 Sarajevo)"1954/2016" STOJANOVIĆ, Biljana Bibliografija doktorskih disertacija, magistarskih, master i diplomskih radova odbranjenih na Odsjeku za geografiju Prirodno-matematičkog fakulteta Univerziteta u Sarajevu u periodu 1954-2016 / [priredila i satavila] Biljana Stojanović. - Sarajevo : Prirodno-matematički fakultet, 2017. - 221 str. ; 25 cm Bibliografija: str. 221. - Registri. ISBN 978-9958-592-97-3 COBISS.BH-ID SADRŽAJ PREDGOVOR ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Skupština Opštine Srebrenica Odluke, Zaključci, Programi I Javni Konkursi
    BILTEN SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA BROJ: 1/2015 Srebrenica, Januar 2015. god. SKUPŠTINA OPŠTINE SREBRENICA ODLUKE, ZAKLJUČCI, PROGRAMI I JAVNI KONKURSI Broj:01-022-185 /14 ODLUKE SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA Srebrenica, 26.12.2014. god. Broj:01-022-184/14 Na osnovu člana 31. Zakona o budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske Srebrenica, 26.12.2014. god. ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 121/12 ), a u skladu sa Zakonom o trezoru ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 16/05 i Na osnovu člana 5. Zakona o Budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske 92/09) i člana 30. Zakona o lokalnoj samoupravi ("Službeni glasnik ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 121/12), člana 30. Zakona Republike Srpske", broj: 101/04, 42/05, 118/05 i 98/13) i člana 32. Statuta Opštine Srebrenica ("Bilten opštine Srebrenica", broj: 10/05), o lokalnoj samoupravi ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: Skupština opštine Srebrenica na XVII redovnoj sjednici održanoj 101/04, 42/05,118/05 i 98/13) i člana 32. Statuta Opštine Srebrenica 26.12.2014. godine je usvojila: ("Bilten opštine Srebrenica", broj: 10/05), Skupština opštine Srebrenica na XVII redovnoj sjednici održanoj 26.12.2014. godine je Odluku usvojila: o izvršenju Budžeta opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu Odluku Član 1. o usvajanju Budžeta opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu Ovom Odlukom propisuje se način izvršenja Budžeta Opštine Član 1. Srebrenica za 2015. godinu (u daljem tekstu: budžet). Budžet opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu sastoji se od: Ova Odluka će se sprovoditi u saglasnosti sa Zakonom o budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske i Zakonom o trezoru. 1. Ukupni prihodi i primici: 6.883.00000 KM, od toga: a) Redovni prihodi tekućeg perioda: 6.115.500,00 KM; Sve Odluke, zaključci i rješenja koji se odnose na budžet moraju biti u b) Tekući grantovi i donacije: 767.500,00 KM.
    [Show full text]