DOCSLIB.ORG

Defining Geographic Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Defining Geographic Communities Defining Geographic Communities Michelle Poland, David C Maré, Motu Working Paper 05–09 Motu Economic and Public Policy Research June 2005 Author contact details David C Maré Senior Fellow Motu Economic and Public Policy Research Trust PO Box 24390 Wellington New Zealand Email: [email protected] Michelle Poland The Families Commission PO Box 2839 Wellington New Zealand Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements This paper is part of Motu’s programme of research on “Understanding Adjustment and Inequality” funded by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research PO Box 24390 Wellington New Zealand Email [email protected] Telephone +64-4-939-4250 Website www.motu.org.nz © 2005 Motu Economic and Public Policy Research Trust. All rights reserved. No portion of this paper may be reproduced without permission of the authors. Motu Working Papers are research materials circulated by their authors for purposes of information and discussion. They have not necessarily undergone formal peer review or editorial treatment. ISSN 1176-2667. Abstract The purpose of this paper is to provide a guide to concepts, ideas, and measurements of geographic communities. The paper investigates the various concepts of geographic communities found in the literature and reviews existing studies to determine how researchers measure geographic communities in practice. JEL classification R11 Keywords Geographic communities, Local labour markets. Contents 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................1 2 Concepts ..........................................................................................................1 2.1 Common location....................................................................................2 2.2 Common ties ...........................................................................................2 2.2.1 Experiences ..............................................................................2 2.2.2 Attitudes, cultures, or beliefs ...................................................2 2.2.3 Access to common resources and institutions..........................2 2.3 Social interactions ...................................................................................3 2.3.1 Bonds .......................................................................................3 2.3.2 Virtual communities.................................................................4 2.4 Interdependence ......................................................................................4 3 What makes a geographic community?...........................................................4 3.1 Geographic boundaries ...........................................................................4 3.2 Common ties ...........................................................................................4 3.3 Social interactions ...................................................................................5 3.4 Interdependencies....................................................................................5 4 Measuring geographic communities................................................................6 4.1 Measuring interactions and social capital ...............................................6 4.1.1 Social network analysis............................................................6 4.1.2 Formal interviews ....................................................................7 4.1.3 Participant observation.............................................................8 4.2 Geographic boundaries ...........................................................................8 4.2.1 Distance-based approach........................................................10 4.2.2 Local government ..................................................................11 4.2.3 Trade-offs...............................................................................11 5 Quantitative studies of geographic communities...........................................12 5.1 Labour markets .....................................................................................12 5.2 Immigration...........................................................................................13 5.3 Neighbourhood effects..........................................................................14 5.4 Evaluating the measures used ...............................................................15 6 Geographic communities in New Zealand ....................................................16 6.1 New Zealand research...........................................................................16 6.2 The Local Government Act 2002..........................................................18 7 Conclusion.....................................................................................................19 References..............................................................................................................20 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide a guide to concepts, ideas, and measurements of geographic communities. The paper investigates the various concepts of geographic communities found in the literature and reviews existing studies to determine how researchers measure geographic communities in practice. The consensus within the literature seems to be that there is no ‘all- purpose’ definition of community. However, there are two main types of communities: interest communities and geographic communities. Interest communities do not usually have a spatial base but are connected through a common interest. Examples include the sporting community and the academic community. A geographic community is one defined over a geographic space. Some type of social interaction or common tie is usually included in this type of definition as well (Poplin, 1979). Although community is a word that usually has positive connotations, this is not always the case (e.g. the mafia community). Communities create insiders and outsiders, those who belong and those who do not. Communities often have barriers to entry in place to protect the way of life for the people in the community. In addition to keeping outsiders out, these barriers may keep members in, resulting in loss of opportunities that may be available outside the community (Harington, 1997, p. 29). For example, an ethnic community may have the advantage of giving its members protection from racism and creating a comfortable, known environment. However, it may also inhibit their learning of the host country’s language and culture. This in turn may foster racism. 2 Concepts The common thread seems to be that people within the community have something in common that is not shared with people outside the community. In this paper, we focus on communities that consist of a common location, common ties, social interactions, or interdependencies. However, these are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for a community. 1 2.1 Common location Most communities have a common location. The common location gives the community something in common that is not shared with others outside of the location. This means that places such as towns and cities can be defined as communities with nothing more in common than that they share the same location. A common location is not essential for a community to exist because members may have something in common other than the location. A community that does have a common location can be called a geographic community. 2.2 Common ties 2.2.1 Experiences A common experience can bring people together and create a community. Such communities can be seen after unexpected tragedies such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and wars. Members of a group who survive such an experience often form bonds with one another due to the shared experience. Another example of shared experiences is that of those who have the same labour or housing market conditions and shocks. 2.2.2 Attitudes, cultures, or beliefs The way in which community is perceived is likely to depend on a person’s attitude, culture, or beliefs. For example, Māori tend to take a more holistic view of community than Europeans do, including extended family relationships in the definition (Harper, 2001; Spellerberg, 2001). In extreme cases, communities may remove themselves from the rest of society in search of their own way of life. Examples of this include enclosed communes and monasteries. 2.2.3 Access to common resources and institutions Common resources and institutions create communities through the shared use of these facilities. It is a common tie in the sense that people who share resources and institutions will have repeated, and often regular, interactions with each other. Examples include local government areas where there are shared community centres, local amenities, and services. 2 Individuals may select the area that they live in based on the services offered. Tiebout (1956) suggests that if there were enough communities, individuals would reveal their preferences for public goods through their choice of community. In addition to this, people living in the same community would be homogeneous in terms of public goods and so a local public goods equilibrium may be Pareto-efficient. Atkinson and Stiglitz (1980) discuss various reasons why the above conclusion may be too simplistic. They point to the possibility of myopic consumers and a very limited choice of communities as reasons why an equilibrium may not
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Developing Communities
    Developing 1 Communities Jerry W. Robinson, Jr., and Gary Paul Green BEHAVIOR OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter and completing the online learning activities, students should be able to 1. Understand the criticism of the concept of “community.” 2. Define community of place. 3. Differentiate between community development and economic development. 4. Describe the social forces that led to the rise of the community development field. 5. Differentiate between development “of” community and development “in” community. 6. Identify issues that influence the interests of residents in specific localities. 7. Understand the role of participation in the community development process. 8. Distinguish between community service-learning and volunteering/community service. ________________________________________ Introduction Much has been written in recent years about the loss of community and the implications for civil society (Putnam, 2000). Globalization has restructured economic, political, and social relationships at the local level. Technological and social changes have opened new paths for sharing collective interests, such as social networking sites on the Internet and mass media that link individuals to a common culture. Corporations and financial institutions shift capital around the globe to seek out more profitable locations for doing business. Workers increasingly move to places where they can find better job opportu - nities. All of these factors undermine the sense of community in places. 1 2 INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Although our social relationships and interests are no longer limited to local communities, the power of place remains. Local issues, such as education, housing, health, and jobs, are critical concerns for most residents. There continues to be interest in mobilizing local residents to build assets that improve their quality of life (Green & Haines, 2007; Kretzmann & McKnight, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Role of Assets in Community-Based Development 3
    The Role of Assets in Community-Based 1 Development ommunity development’s intellectual roots are in several academic C disciplines, including sociology, economics, political science, planning, social work, and even architecture. The interdisciplinary approach of com- munity development has many advantages, but it also presents some ana- lytical problems. It lacks a common language, a conceptual framework, and a set of agreed-upon issues or problems. Community development also is frequently driven more by practice than by theory. There also is distributeconsiderable debate among practitioners whether community development is primarily a process or an outcome. or Community development has always had a diverse set of objectives: solv- ing local problems (e.g., unemployment and poverty), addressing inequalities of wealth and power, promoting democracy, and building a sense of com- munity (Rubin & Rubin, 1992). As a result, it has been defined in a variety of ways, including local economic development,post, political empowerment, service provision, real estate development, comprehensive planning, and job training. In this book, we do not overcome these ambiguities, but we define some of the major concepts and issues for which there is considerable agree- ment in the community development field today. We believe the asset approach offers the best potentialcopy, for providing a common conceptual basis for community development theory and for practitioners. We begin with one of the most slippery terms—community. not BOX 1.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FACTS •• RacialDo and ethnic minorities account for 83% of the growth in metropolitan areas. •• One out of eight Americans is an immigrant, and half of the foreign born live in a few of the largest metropolitan areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Fan Communities and Subgroups: Exploring Individuals' Supporter Group Experiences Bruce David Tyler University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected]
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Open Access Dissertations 2-2013 Fan Communities and Subgroups: Exploring Individuals' Supporter Group Experiences Bruce David Tyler University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Sports Management Commons Recommended Citation Tyler, Bruce David, "Fan Communities and Subgroups: Exploring Individuals' Supporter Group Experiences" (2013). Open Access Dissertations. 711. https://doi.org/10.7275/xf75-ac29 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/711 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FAN COMMUNITIES AND SUBGROUPS: EXPLORING INDIVIDUALS’ SUPPORTER GROUP EXPERIENCES A Dissertation Presented by BRUCE DAVID TYLER, JR. Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2013 Isenberg School of Management Department of Sport Management © Copyright by B. David Tyler 2013 All Rights Reserved FAN COMMUNITIES AND SUBGROUPS: EXPLORING INDIVIDUALS’ SUPPORTER GROUP EXPERIENCES A Dissertation Presented by BRUCE DAVID TYLER. JR. Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________ Sheranne Fairley, Chair _______________________________________ Todd Crosset, Member _______________________________________ Easwar Iyer, Member _______________________________________ James Gladden, Outside Member __________________________________________ D. Anthony Butterfield, Ph.D., Department Head Isenberg School of Management ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thank you to all friends, family, teachers, mentors, and coworkers who helped me during this process. Special thanks is owed to my wife.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Meanings of Community in the Social Sciences
    Connected Communities Concepts and meanings of community in the social sciences Discussion Paper Valerie Walkerdine and David Studdert 1 CONCEPTS AND MEANINGS OF COMMUNITY IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES Concepts and meanings of community in the social sciences Discussion Paper Valerie Walkerdine and David Studdert Executive Summary The project „Concepts and meanings of community in the social sciences‟ undertook to produce a conceptual review, linking theoretical underpinnings with the usage of the concepts of community in empirical research and describing the manner in which these conceptualisations appear in government and non-government sector policies and practices. The review mapped key academic texts across 9 disciplines and fields since the 1960s. It reviewed the ways in which key conceptualizations appeared in empirical articles within these fields and disciplines and also appeared within government, NGO and voluntary sector websites, where community was an explicit aspect of the organisation‟s brief. The review showed that while there is a sophisticated history of debate and investigation within a few key disciplines, there has been a paucity of concepts used within empirical research, applied fields and policy websites. The impact of this is to make community into a „spray-on term‟, in which there is little reference to concepts but in which implicit meanings emphasize the significance of community as an object and downplay the importance of social relations and experience. The implications of this for research, policy and practice are profound: we badly need research which allows community as action to be conceptualized in ways which understand and thus support action by community members, central to the localism agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY PERSPECTIVES on SOCIAL CAPITAL THEORY and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRACTICE by Douglas D
    Journal of the Community Development Society Vol. 33 No. 1 2002 COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIAL CAPITAL THEORY AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRACTICE By Douglas D. Perkins, Joseph Hughey, and Paul W. Speer ABSTRACT Concepts and research from community psychology can inform community development practice by reframing social capital theory. Social capital (SC) is generally defined and measured at the interpersonal, community, institutional, or societal levels in terms of networks (bridging) and norms of reciprocity and trust (bonding) within those networks. SC should be analyzed in a multi-level ecological framework in terms of both individual psychological and behavioral conceptions (sense of community, collective efficacy—or empowerment, neighboring, and citizen participation) and institutional and community network-level conceptions. Excessive concern for social cohesion undermines the ability to confront or engage in necessary conflict, and thus, it dis-empowers the community. Instead of emphasizing social cohesion, “network-bridging” opportunities to increase power, access, and learning should be emphasized. Institutional and community network analysis shows how SC operates at those levels and where to target service resources and develop mediating structures. Psychological and behavioral factors point to factors that motivate individuals to engage in building SC and methods to maintain and improve that engagement. Keywords: community psychology, social capital theory, sense of community, collective efficacy, empowerment, neighboring,
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Phenomenon of the Youth Subculture and Its Place in the Cultural and Educational Environment of the Russian Higher Education Institution
    Kolesnik, E., Stepanov, V., Pavlova, L. /Vol. 9 Núm. 26: 88 – 96 / Febrero 2020 88 Artículo de investigación Study of the phenomenon of the youth subculture and its place in the cultural and educational environment of the Russian higher education institution Исследование феномена молодёжной субкультуры и её места в культурно- образовательной среде российского вуза Recibido: 20 de septiembre del 2019 Aceptado: 12 de noviembre del 2019 Written by: Elena Andreyevna Kolesnik32 https://elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=776891 ORCID: 0000-0001-5678-2257 Vladimir Gennadyevich Stepanov33 https://elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=1053149 ORCID: 0000-0002-9211-6267 Larisa Leonidovna Pavlova34 https://elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=402877 ORCID: 0000-0003-1626-9429 Abstract Аннотация The article considers the youth subculture from В статье рассматривается молодёжная the position of its place in the cultural and субкультура с позиции её места в культурно- educational environment on the example of образовательной среде на примере вузов universities in Tyumen. The authors concluded г.Тюмени. Авторами был сделан вывод, что that the concept of subculture accumulates a понятие субкультура аккумулирует в себе certain system of values and attitudes inherent in определенную систему ценностей и this or that isolated social community, as well as установок, присущих той или иной their ways of behavior and life styles. In the обособленной социальной общности, а также process of analysis it was determined that there способов их поведения и жизненных стилей. was a positive attitude towards youth subcultures В процессе анализа было определено, что в in universities. At the same time, the educational вузах бытует положительное отношение к environment of universities is not always able to молодёжным субкультурам.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW to DO CREATIVE PLACEMAKING • III 90 Art: a Way of Life in Native Communities by LORI POURIER
    how to do placemaking creative National Endowment for the Arts how to do placemaking creative An Action-Oriented Guide to Arts in Community Development National Endowment for the Arts Table of Contents VIII How This Book Is Organized 1 So How Do You Do Creative Placemaking? BY JASON SCHUPBACH Chapter 1: Inclusive Planning + Equitable Development 6 How Creativity and Culture Can Contribute to Community Planning BY LAURA ZABEL 10 Equity in Practice: Strategies from Alternate ROOTS’ History of Creative Placemaking BY CARLTON TURNER 16 Understanding Arts and Culture in Equitable Development BY JEREMY LIU 20 Stitching It Together: Community Planning as Creative Act BY TOM BORRUP 28 The Role of Performing Arts in Place BY JENNA MORAN 32 Case Study: Takoma Park, MD - Working with Dancers and Residents to Plan the Future of a Transit Corridor II • NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS Chapter 2: Economic Opportunity 38 Bringing Back Main Street: How Community Development Corporations and Artists Are Transforming America’s Troubled Commercial Corridors BY SETH BEATTIE 42 Case Study: New Haven, CT - Using Empty Storefronts as Catalysts for Economic Revitalization 46 The Human-Scale Spark BY ESTHER ROBINSON 50 Strategic Planning for Arts, Culture, and Entertainment Districts BY AMANDA J. ASHLEY 56 Case Study: Dubuque, IA - Creating an Arts Master Plan for a Historic Millwork District 60 Can Arts Drive Rural Economic Development? BY CHRIS BECK AND TRACY TAFT 68 Case Study: Ajo, AZ - Reimagining a Historic School and Town Center Chapter 3: Community Identity
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Role of Social Capital in the Community Development
    ASSESSING THE ROLE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FIELD: A MULTI-LEVEL ANALYSIS by HYOUNG YONG KIM (Under the Direction of Kevin L. DeWeaver) ABSTRACT A multi-level and dimensional approach to social capital is applied for this study. This approach is particularly suitable for addressing the conceptual issues of social capital because it is a differentiated phenomenon that varies in its levels and components. The present study is thus the first empirical test of the three competing models of social capital that can be applied to the field of community development. In a multi-level framework, 1) the effect of individual- level social capital (bonding, bridging, and linking) on community development action is tested (network dynamic model), 2) it is examined whether neighborhood-level social cohesion has an independent effect on residents’ community development action (collective efficacy model), and 3) cross-level interaction tests the hypothesis that neighborhood-level social cohesion accounts for the way in which individual-level social capital are related to community development action (synergy model). In addition, the mediation and moderation models specify the associations. The empirical model of the study is thus designed to increase the explanatory power of each of social capital construct, using hierarchical linear and nonlinear models. The results generally support the network dynamic and collective efficacy hypotheses, concluding that both individual-level social capital and neighborhood-level social cohesion are significant predictors of the outcome, but there are substantial differences in the magnitude of the effect. Specifically, bridging and linking types of social capital produce stronger effects on residents’ community development action than any other variables, and the effect of neighborhood-level social cohesion is small and partially mediated by individual-level bonding capital.
    [Show full text]
  • A Community of Interest in the Due Process Calculus Charles H
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2000 A Community of Interest in the Due Process Calculus Charles H. Koch Jr. William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Koch, Charles H. Jr., "A Community of Interest in the Due Process Calculus" (2000). Faculty Publications. 637. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/637 Copyright c 2000 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs HOUSTON LAW REVIEW ARTICLE A COMMUNITY OF INTEREST IN THE DUE PROCESS CALCULUS Charles H. Koch, Jr.· TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE SEARCH FOR COHERENCE IN THE DUE PROCESS CALCULUS ........••........••...........•.....•....•................................. 638 A. Context ......................................................................... 638 B. Breaking Out ofBalancing ......................................... 644 C. A New Attitude for Procedural Design ........................ 655 II. THE SEARCH FOR COHERENCE IN THE MATHEWS FACTORS 657 A. The "Government's Interest" Redefined as the Community's Interest .................................................. 658 B. Coordinating Community Interest and Individual Interest ...................................................... 663 III. ENHANCEMENT OF THE PROCEDURAL DESIGN FACTORS ..... 670 A. Cost Factors ................................................................. 670 B. Effectiveness ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zinkiewicz & Smith
    QUT Digital Repository: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ Obst, Patricia L. and Zinkiewicz, Lucy and Smith, Sandra G. (2001) Sense of Community in Science Fiction Fandom, Part Two: Comparing Neighborhood and Interest Group Sense of Community. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1). pp. 105-117. © Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons Sense of Community Compared 1 Sense of Community in Science Fiction Fandom, Part Two: Comparing Neighborhood and Interest Group Sense of Community Patricia Obst Lucy Zinkiewicz The Queensland University of Technology The University of Southern Queensland Brisbane, Australia Toowoomba, Australia Sandra G. Smith The Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Published as: Obst, Patricia L. and Zinkiewicz, Lucy and Smith, Sandra G. (2001) Sense of Community in Science Fiction Fandom, Part Two: Comparing Neighborhood and Interest Group Sense of Community. Journal of Community Psychology 30(1):105-117. Abstract There is much debate in community psychology literature as to the dimensions underlying the construct psychological sense of community (PSOC). One of the few theoretical discussions is that of McMillan and Chavis (1986), who hypothesized four dimensions: Belonging; Fulfillment of Needs; Influence; and Shared Emotional Connection. Debate has also emerged regarding the role of identification within PSOC. However, few studies have explored the place of identification in PSOC. In addition, while PSOC has been applied to both communities of interest and geographical communities, to date little research has compared a single group’s PSOC with a community of interest to their PSOC with their geographical communities. The current study explored PSOC with participants’ interest and geographical communities in a sample (N = 359) of members of science fiction fandom, a community of interest with membership from all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Investigation on Relational Social Capital in a Virtual
    Abstract Empirical A virtual community of interest has a specific and narrow topic of discussion. Therefore, these Investigation on communities attract registered members who are focused on knowledge sharing. The current research examines whether network ties, which are an aspect Relational Social of structural social capital that can be categorized into strong and weak social ties, can provide a non- Capital in a Virtual trivial explanation for members’ trust, reciprocity, and identification in a virtual community for website Community for programming interest. This relationship enables us to examine a context in which members share a common goal of resolving programming problems Website through knowledge sharing in contrast with other community settings where only general topics are Programming discussed (e.g., societal and emotional issues). Data were collected through a survey of a virtual Chuan-Hoo Tan community for website programming composed of 69 members. Affirming conventional perception, City University of Hong Kong results of the study indicate that weak ties affect the level of generalized trust and facilitate group identification. Remarkably, the number of members’ Juliana Sutanto strong ties is not significantly related to the degree of Lancaster University their perceived norms regarding generalized reciprocity. Reciprocity refers to a mutual expectation that a benefit granted at present should be repaid in the future. The results suggest two key Bernard C.Y. Tan points. First, even for a virtual community of interest, National University of Singapore weak ties overshadow strong ties in explaining the outcome variables. Second, reciprocity is not guaranteed even in a focused form of discussion with a non-social topic that involves specialized knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Sense of Community and Its Relevance to Well-Being and Everyday Life in Australia
    The Australian Psychological Society Ltd Psychological sense of community and its relevance to well-being and everyday life in Australia Grace Pretty, PhD The University of Southern Queensland Brian Bishop, PhD Curtin University Adrian Fisher PhD Christopher Sonn, PhD Victoria University The Australian Psychological Society September 2006 Copyright © The Australian Psychological Society Ltd ABN 23 000 543 788 The Australian Psychological Society Ltd, Level 11, 257 Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 Phone +61 3 8662 3300; Fax +66 3 9663 6177; Email [email protected]; Web www.psychology.org.au 2 Abstract Sense of community is a concept that has considerable currency within a vast range of disciplines and practices. It serves as a criterion for the assessment of social capitol; the generation of social policies; the development of social and geographical communities; and the evaluation of community capacity building. Community psychologists consider it central to their value-based praxis in promoting social justice and social change. However it is also employed as a common lay term to refer to feelings of belonging, identity and support. It occurs in public domain discourse such as reporting community response to disaster, promoting the value of a rural lifestyle, and advertising urban residential developments. For psychologists, and other professionals and policy makers, there is the real need to consider the processes that are inherent in living in a community, in providing services and interventions, in understanding processes of inclusion and exclusion, with resultant positive or negative impacts on mental and physical health. Because sense of community discourses are utilised for such diverse purposes, this paper is written for multiple constituencies with a view to encouraging and informing its use in collaborative efforts to develop and sustain healthy Australian communities.
    [Show full text]