DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment for the Euclid Fueling Station Project, City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment for the Euclid Fueling Station Project, City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California Euclid-Hazard 7-Eleven Service Station Project Appendix B Paleontological and Cultural Resources Assessment Euclid-Hazard 7-Eleven Service Station CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE EUCLID FUELING STATION PROJECT, CITY OF SANTA ANA, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Sagecrest Planning+Environmental 2400 E Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, CA 92806 Authors: Logan Freeberg, B.A. and Kim Scott, M.S. Principal Investigator for Archaeology: John Gust, Ph.D., RPA Principal Investigator for Paleontology: Kim Scott, M.S. October 2019 Cogstone Project Number: 4797 Type of Study: Cultural (Phase I including survey) and Paleontological Resources Assessment Archaeological Sites: None Paleontological localities: None USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle: Anaheim, CA 1981 Area: Approximately 0.72 acres Key Words: Negative survey, cultural resources assessment, paleontological resources assessment 1518 West Taft Avenue Field Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 San Diego • Riverside • Morro Bay • Sacramento Toll free 888-333-3212 Office (714) 974-8300 Federal Certifications EDWOSB, SDB State Certifications DBE, WBE, SBE, UDBE Euclid Fueling Station Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................... III INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF STUDY ........................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT PERSONNEL ...................................................................................................................................... 5 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................... 6 STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS ................................................................................................................. 6 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ........................................................................................................... 6 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................. 6 PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE ..................................................................................................................................... 7 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................ 7 NATIVE AMERICAN HUMAN REMAINS ...................................................................................................................... 8 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, TITLE 14, SECTION 4307 ............................................................................... 8 LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS ............................................................................................................... 8 CITY OF SANTA ANA ............................................................................................................................................... 8 DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ......................................... 9 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 GEOLOGIC SETTING ......................................................................................................................................... 9 STRATIGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 PALEONTOLOGICAL SETTING ..................................................................................................................... 11 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ......................................................................................................................... 11 PREHISTORIC SETTING .................................................................................................................................. 12 ETHNOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................................. 16 HISTORIC SETTING .......................................................................................................................................... 18 PROJECT AREA HISTORY .............................................................................................................................. 18 RECORDS SEARCH ................................................................................................................................................ 19 PALEONTOLOGICAL RECORDS SEARCH ................................................................................................. 19 HOLOCENE FOSSILS ............................................................................................................................................. 20 LATE PLEISTOCENE FOSSILS ................................................................................................................................. 20 CALIFORNIA HISTORIC RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM ......................................................... 23 OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOURCES ...................................................................................................... 26 SACRED LANDS FILE SEARCH ...................................................................................................................... 28 SURVEY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 28 SURVEY METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 28 SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................. 28 IMPACT ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................ 31 PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY ............................................................................................................. 31 CULTURAL SENSITIVITY ............................................................................................................................... 32 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 33 PALEONTOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................. 33 ARCHAEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................ 33 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................................................................. 35 APPENDIX A. QUALIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 39 Cogstone i Euclid Fueling Station Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment APPENDIX B. PALEONTOLOGICAL RECORD SEARCH ............................................................................. 45 APPENDIX C. NATIVE AMERICAN SCOPING ................................................................................................ 48 APPENDIX D. PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY RANKING CRITERIA ............................................. 52 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. PROJECT VICINITY MAP .............................................................................................................................. 1 FIGURE 2. PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 3. AERIAL MAP ................................................................................................................................................ 4 FIGURE 4. TRIBAL BOUNDARY MAP ........................................................................................................................... 17 FIGURE 5. LAND GRANT MAP ..................................................................................................................................... 19 FIGURE 6. OVERVIEW OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROJECT AREA, VIEW SOUTHEAST ........................... 29 FIGURE 7. OVERVIEW OF THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE PROJECT AREA, VIEW EAST ......................................... 30 FIGURE 8. SOUTHERN WALL OF PROJECT AREA WITH TRANSIENT ENCAMPMENT AT RIGHT, VIEW SOUTH .......... 30 FIGURE 9. SURFACE SOILS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA .......................................................................................... 31 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. CULTURE CHRONOLOGY ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LA BREA TAR PITS Name______
    LA BREA TAR PITS Name_________________________ Please answer the following questions about the La Brea Tar Pits (George C. Page) Museum. The answers for these questions will be found inside the museum. Just after entering the museum, there is a movie theater. Go catch the movie (it is short), and write any five important facts from this movie. Name of movie_________________ F1: F2: F3: F4: F5: 1. How old is this deposit of tar? Era_______________ Period_______________ Epoch_______________ 2. Describe how “tar” traps animal and planet life. 3. Who was Glossotherium harlani? How big did it get? 4. What kind of human bones have been found at La Brea? How old are these bones? How old was the human when he or she died? 5. What was Smilodon californicus? What were its eating habits? 6. At La Brea, they found at least 159 skeletons of what large plant eater? 7. What was Mammuthus columbi? How big was it? 8. Who is Bison antiquus? How many skeletons of this critter did they find? How do they compare to the modern Bison? 9. Who was Mammoth americanum? To which modern day critter are they related? 10. Who was Capromeryx minor? 11. The “wall of jaws” is an awesome display of the jaws of what critter? What did they eat? Why do you think so many got stuck in the tar? 12. Who’s bigger, the American Lion or the California Saber Tooth Cat? Compare their sizes. 13. What was Equus occidentalis? What modern day animal is it related to? 14. How many different species of dinosaurs have been found in the tar pits? Why? 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Ppsad~A. Calif~Ia. ' 1 Corit1'ibut!On No
    ' . With two ~figures ' .. ,, , [RepriD.ted from Ca.rnegie Institution of W~n Pu'blicatioJl No. 4<K Pag~ 4$> to 53. Iseub~ AugJst, 1930] I ' I Balth{(iraduqte 1 Scfw~l of tM G'f.l.ogic~l S'*"'­ Cqlifornif.i rlnstitilte of Tedinol.off - Ppsad~a. Calif~ia. ' 1 Corit1'ibut!on No.,. ,a g· 1 I v CAPROMERYX MINOR TAYLOR FROM THE McKITTRICK PLEISTOCENE, CALIFORNIA By EUSTACE L. Fum.oNG With two text-figures 49 CAPROMERYX MINOR TAYLOR FROM THE McKITTRICK PLEISTOCENE, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION The occurrence of a Pleistocene vertebrate fauna in an e.sphalt deposit near McKittrick, California, has been reported by J. C. Merriam and C. Stock. Since the publication of the provisional list of mammals from this locality, several types new to the assemb­ lage have been discovered in the deposit. Among these should be recorded the small antilocaprid, Capromeryx minor. This species occurs here in association with the prong-horn antelope Antilocapra. Three species of the genus Capromeryx are now known from the Pleistocene of North America. The type, C. furcifer, was described by Matthew 1 from Hay Springs, Nebraska. C. minor Taylor 2 occurs at Rancho La Brea, and C. mexicana Furlong 8 is recorded from Tequixquiac, Mexico. The occurrence of C. minor at McKittrick extends the range of this species during the Pleistocene from the Los Angeles basin to the Great Valley of California. Members of the family Antilocapridre are apparently sparsely represented in the McKittrick fauna, as only one individual of Capromeryx has been found, while several individuals of Antilocapra are known to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington Monograph Series
    BTILL UMI Carnegie Institution of Washington Monograph Series BT ILL UMI 1 The Carnegie Institution of Washington, D. C. 1902. Octavo, 16 pp. 2 The Carnegie Institution of Washington, D. C. Articles of Incorporation, Deed of Trust, etc. 1902. Octavo, 15 pp. 3 The Carnegie Institution of Washington, D. C. Proceedings of the Board of Trustees, January, 1902. 1902. Octavo, 15 pp. 4 CONARD, HENRY S. The Waterlilies: A Monograph of the Genus Nymphaea. 1905. Quarto, [1] + xiii + 279 pp., 30 pls., 82 figs. 5 BURNHAM, S. W. A General Catalogue of Double Stars within 121° of the North Pole. 1906. Quarto. Part I. The Catalogue. pp. [2] + lv + 1–256r. Part II. Notes to the Catalogue. pp. viii + 257–1086. 6 COVILLE, FREDERICK VERNON, and DANIEL TREMBLY MACDOUGAL. Desert Botani- cal Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution. 1903. Octavo, vi + 58 pp., 29 pls., 4 figs. 7 RICHARDS, THEODORE WILLIAM, and WILFRED NEWSOME STULL. New Method for Determining Compressibility. 1903. Octavo, 45 pp., 5 figs. 8 FARLOW, WILLIAM G. Bibliographical Index of North American Fungi. Vol. 1, Part 1. Abrothallus to Badhamia. 1905. Octavo, xxxv + 312 pp. 9 HILL, GEORGE WILLIAM, The Collected Mathematical Works of. Quarto. Vol. I. With introduction by H. POINCARÉ. 1905. xix + 363 pp. +errata, frontispiece. Vol. II. 1906. vii + 339 pp. + errata. Vol. III. 1906. iv + 577 pp. Vol. IV. 1907. vi + 460 pp. 10 NEWCOMB, SIMON. On the Position of the Galactic and Other Principal Planes toward Which the Stars Tend to Crowd. (Contributions to Stellar Statistics, First Paper.) 1904. Quarto, ii + 32 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • LA BREA TAR PITS Name______F16 Please Answer the Following Questions About the La Brea Tar Pits (George C
    LA BREA TAR PITS Name_________________________ F16 Please answer the following questions about the La Brea Tar Pits (George C. Page) Museum. The answers for these questions will be found inside the museum. 1. How old is this deposit of tar? You may need to look this up in your textbook… Era_______________ Period_______________ Epoch_______________ 2. Describe how “tar” traps animal and planet life. 3. Who was Glossotherium harlani? How big did it get? 4. What kind of human bones have been found at La Brea? How old are these bones? How old was the human when he or she died? 5. What was Smilodon californicus? What were its eating habits? 6. At La Brea, they found at least 159 skeletons of what large plant eater? 7. What was Mammuthus columbi? How big was it? 8. Who is Bison antiquus? How many skeletons of this critter did they find? How do they compare to the modern Bison? 9. Who was Mammoth americanum? To which modern day critter are they related? 10. Who was Capromeryx minor? 11. The “wall of jaws” is an awesome display of the jaws of what critter? What did they eat? Why do you think so many got stuck in the tar? 12. What types of plants are fossilized here in La Brea? Give the scientific name and common name for at least three: Scientific Name Common Name __________________________ ________________________ __________________________ ________________________ __________________________ ________________________ 13. What is the American Lion’s new name? Who is bigger, this one or the California Saber Tooth Cat? 14. What was Equus occidentalis? What modern day animal is it related to? 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Nmg25n2: New Mexico Geological Society Spring Meeting Abs 2003
    analyses of these and other stalagmites for ele- tional reconstructions over the “collapse,” iden- mental variations. Ultimately this study will tification of the last paleo-water table (base of Abstracts constrain specific relationships between physi- porosity), and circular seismic anomalies (possi- cal, mineralogical, elemental and possibly iso- bly representing deepest preserved cave devel- topic variations in speleothems and changes in opment) deeper within the platform suggest effective precipitation. several periods of exposure in which the El Abra New Mexico Geological Society reef was sub-aerially exposed to altitudes of sev- spring meeting eral thousand feet. The Santa Agueda field 3-D seismic survey and interpretation was the first The New Mexico Geological Society annu- TIMING OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE acquisition and mapping along the western al spring meeting was held on April 11, SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES edge of the Faja de Oro atoll. Special thanks to 2003, at New Mexico Institute of Mining AROUND THE YOUNGER DRYAS, by Vic- PEMEX Exploration-Alfredo Guzman for per- and Technology, Socorro. Following are the tor J. Polyak, [email protected], Jessica B. T. Ras- mission to present this work. abstracts from all sessions given at that mussen, and Yemane Asmerom, Department of meeting. Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131 ROLE OF EVAPORITE KARST IN REGION- Session 1—Caves and karst p. 41 Speleothem growth in moisture-limited regions, AL GROUND WATER CIRCULATION IN Session 2—Paleontology p. 43 such as the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexi- THE LOWER PECOS VALLEY, by Lewis A. Session 3—Sedimentology/stratigraphy p.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Vertebrates of New Mexico
    Vertebrate Paleontology in New Mexico. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin 2, 1993 179 QUATERNARY VERTEBRATES OF NEW MEXICO ARTHUR H. HARRIS Laboratory for Environmental Biology, University of Texas at El Paso. El Paso, TX 79968—0519 Abstract—Approximately 346 species of vertebrates are represented in the Quaternary fossil record of New Mexico. These include 4 fishes, I salamander, 13 anurans, 5 turtles, 19 lizards, 23 snakes, 119 birds, and 162 mammals. Some 22 taxa are from the vicinity of the Blancan/Irvingtonian transition, 12 most likely are Irvingtonian, and 4 are possibly Illinoian in age. Although many sites are undated with precision, most remaining sites probably are Wisconsinan, with well over 300 taxa. INTRODUCTION omitted, particularly those from the archaeological literature, this list Although Quaternary vertebrate fossils have long been known from provides a starting point. Documentation of occurrence necessarily is New Mexico, there never has been a comprehensive list for the state. limited because of the immense number of taxa represented from the Existence of such a database would greatly simplify research in paleo- state coupled with space limitations for publication. Work in progress biology and add depth to studies of modern biogeography and syste- eventually should alleviate this situation. matics. This paper attempts to establish such a database by bringing The references include a large proportion of the primary and important together published records for the state and adding unpublished records secondary literature, but the aim has been to allow entry into the lit- represented in the collections of the Laboratory for Environmental Bi- erature rather than to provide an exhaustive bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • 286365181.Pdf
    Los Angeles Museum Publication No. 3 A FURTHER STUDY OF THE QUATERNARY ANTELOPES OF SHELTER CAVE, NEW MEXICO by CHESTER STOCK Science Series No. 3 Paleontology No. 3 PP. 1-45, 3 Pis., 11 Figs. in Text Los Angeles, California March 18, 1932 CONTENTS PAGE List of Illustrations 4 Introduction 7 Nature and Significance of Preservation 8 T etranieryx conkli11g£ Stock 10 Holotype 10 Horn-cores 12 Mandible 16 Cervical Vertebrae 18 Sacrum 25 Pelvis 27 Carpus 27 Femur 29 Astragalus 30 Calcaneum 31 N avicular-cuboid 32 Cannon Bones 33 Phalanges 35 Dung 36 Capromeryx, sp. 36 • LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE Plate I. T etrameryx conklingi Stock. Holotype, No. 174. Fig. 1, lateral view; fig. 2. posterior view; x 1. Los Angeles Museum Collection. Quaternary deposits, Shelter Cave, New Mexico. 41 Plate 2. T etranieryx conklingi Stock. Holotype, No. 174. Fig. 1, lateral view; fig. 2. ventral view of basicranium; x I. Los Angeles Museum Collection. Quaternary deposits, Shelter Cave, New Mexico. 43 A11tilocapra america11a (Ord). No. M760, Los Angeles Museum Collection. Fig 3, ventral view of basicranium; x 1. Recent. 43 Plate 3. Tetramrr~>'X conklingi Stock. Figs. 1 and 2, ramus of mandible, No. 177, lateral and dorsal views; fig. 3, No. 669, lateral view; x I. Figs. 4 and S, dung tentatively referred to Tetrameryx conklingi; x I. Los Angeles Museum Collection. Quaternary deposits, Shelter Cave, New Mexico. 4S Fig. I. Profiles of orbital and cranial portions· of skulls of A, T etrameryx conklingi Stock and B, Antilocapra americana (Ord); x ~- 10 . Fig. 2. T etrameryx conklingi Stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleobios 33:1–14, July 22, 2016 Paleobios
    PaleoBios 33:1–14, July 22, 2016 PaleoBios OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Kaitlin Clare Maguire and Patricia A. Holroyd (2016). Pleistocene vertebrates of Silicon Valley (Santa Clara County, California) Cover photo: Painting by Karen Carr depicting California's Santa Clara Valley during the Pleistocene. Citation: Maguire, K.C. & Holroyd, P. A. 2016. Pleistocene vertebrates of Silicon Valley (Santa Clara County, California). PaleoBios, 33. ucmp_paleobios_31767. PaleoBios 33:1–14, July 22, 2016 Pleistocene vertebrates of Silicon Valley (Santa Clara County, California) KAITLIN CLARE MAGUIRE1, 2* and PATRICIA A. HOLROYD2 1 School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, California 95343; current address, U.S. Geological Survey, 970 Lusk Street, Boise, ID 83706, [email protected] 2 University of California Museum of Paleontology, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Bldg., Berkeley, CA 94720 Here we report on late Pleistocene fossil vertebrates from new and previously described localities in Santa Clara County, California. The three new localities and specimens include: a partial mammoth pelvis from UCMP V91128 (Lawrence Expressway E); a juvenile cranial specimen of Mammuthus columbi from UCMP V99597 (SCVWD “Lupe” Mammoth), now on display at the San Jose Children’s Discovery Center; and a relatively diverse assemblage of me- dium- to large-sized mammals, including a nearly complete forelimb of Paramylodon harlani from UCMP V99891 (Babcock’s Bones). We also reassess specimens and assemblages from the following eight previously known localities: Molecular Medicine Building (UCMP V90003); Alma Street Underpass at Page Mill Road (USGS M1203); Moun- tain View Dump (USGS M1227); Sunnyvale Sewer (USGS M1218); Calabaza, Sunnyvale Sewer (USGS M1218A); Matadero Creek (USGS M1001); Matadero Creek, Veteran’s Hospital (USGS M1202); and Milpitas (UCMP V4916).
    [Show full text]
  • Supercontinent - Pangea
    Supercontinent - Pangea . (zoom in to view the names of the geologic eras) Alfred Wegner Supercontinent - Pangea . Pangea Gondwanaland Laurasia 1 Geologic Time Milankovitch Cycles (~ 100,000 years) Milankovitch Cycles (~ 100,000 years) Milutin Milankovitch (1879-1958) 2 Factors affecting Earth’s Climate 1. Milankovich Cycles (~100,000 years) 2. Pacific Decadal Oscillation (~10 – 15 years) 3. El Nino/La Nina Cycles (annual cycles*) Time Scale: The Cenozoic Era “Recent Life” • Pleistocene Epoch – Ice ages (WIKN) – Humans appear – 1.8 my to 10,000 yr http://www.museum.state.il.us/exhibits/ice_ages/images/loopglac.gif Continental Glaciers . Stages Wisconsin (most recent) What is a “nunatak”? Illinoian Kansan Nebraskan (oldest) 3 Human Migration National Genographic Project Human Migration Source: www.utexas.edu/features/2007/ancestry/ Continental Glaciers . Question: What type of vegetation covered the landscape immediately south of the continental glaciers? 4 Glaciers, Biotic Exchange, and Vegetation Patterns Vegetation Patterns during Glacial Periods North American Glaciers . Note the names and locations of the refugium 5 Glacial Lake Missoula Glacial Lake Missoula The name Missoula is derived from a Flathead (Salish) term meaning “cold, chilling waters”. Continental Glaciers . How did the continental glaciers affect the Willamette Valley? 6 Glacial Lake Missoula Glacial Lake Missoula A Sudden Onslaught of Water The Dalles, Oregon ~ 1,000 feet 7 Question.. Question: As the glaciers formed, they locked up water, how much lower were sea levels then? Astoria Trench Pacific Salmon Species Genus Oncorhynchus – “hooknose” Pink Salmon (O. gorbuscha) Steelhead Trout (O. mykiss) Chum Salmon (O. keta) Sea-run Cutthroat Trout (O. clarkii) Sockeye Salmon (O.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan University Library
    CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN VOL. XVI, NO. 1, pp. 1-223 (16 pls., 18 figs.) JULY 1, 1960 TWO LATE PLEISTOCENE FAUNAS FROM SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS BY CLAUDE W. HIBBARD and DWIGHT W. TAYLOR MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Director: LEWISB. KELLUM The series of contributions from the Museum of Paleontology is a medium for the publication of papers based chiefly upon the collections in the Museum. 1 When the number of pages issued is sufficient to make a volume, a title page and a table of contents will be sent to libraries on the mailing list, and to individuals upon request. A list of the separate papers may also be obtained. Correspondence should be directed to the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. VOLS.11-XV. Parts of volumes may be obtained if avai!able. VOLUMEXVI 1. Two Late Pleistocene Faunas from Southwestern Kansas, by Claude W. Hibbard and Dwight W. Taylor. Pages 1-223, with 16 plates. VOL. XVI. NO. 1. pp . 1-223 (16 pls.. 18 figs.) JULY 1. 1960 TWO LATE PLEISTOCENE FAUNAS FROM SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS BY CLAUDE W . HIBBARD and DWIGHT W . TAYLOR CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................. 5 Acknowledgments ...................................................... 5 Comparison of late Pleistocene and Recent faunas ............................ 6 Environmental interpretation ........................................... 16 Faunal differences ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North American Geology
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 524 NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY FOR 1911 WITH SUBJECT INDEX BY JOHN M. NICKLES WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Serials examined.......................................................... 6 Bibliography............................................................. 11 Classified scheme of subject headings............................'............ 103 Index.................................................................... 105 Lists......... ............................................................ 144 Chemical analyses.................................................... 144 Minerals described.................................................... 144 Rocks described...................................................... 145 Geologic formations described........................................... 146 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY FOR 1911, WITH SUBJECT INDEX. By JOHN M. NICKLES. INTRODUCTION. The bibliography of North American geology, including paleon­ tology, petrology, and mineralogy, for the year 1911 follows the plan and arrangement of its immediate predecessors, the bibliographies for 1906-7, 1908, 1909, and 1910 (Bulletins 372, 409, 444, and 495 of the U. S. Geological Survey). It includes publications bearing on the geology of the Continent of North America and adjoining islands, also Panama and the Hawaiian Islands. Papers by American
    [Show full text]
  • AAMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 1034 the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY June 26, 1939 New York City
    AAMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 1034 THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY June 26, 1939 New York City A STUDY OF TETRAMERYX AND ASSOCIATED FOSSILS FROM PAPAGO SPRING CAVE, SONOITA, ARIZONA BY EDWIN H. COLBERT AND ROBERT G. CHAFFEE INTRODUCTION During the summer of 1934, Messrs. of its horns. Not only is Tetrameryx of Quentin Roosevelt and J. W. Burden ex- interest because of its anatomnical features, plored a limestone cave near Papago Spring, but also because of its association, for some two and one-half miles southwest of Roosevelt and Burden found pottery frag- Sonoita, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, and, ments and other artifacts in Papago Spring as a result of their field work, discovered cave that would seem to point to the fact various skull and skeletal remains of the that Tetrameryx onusrosagris was contem- Pleistocene antilocaprid, Tetrameryx. poraneous with early man in southwestern These fossils were sent to the American United States. Moreover, among the as- Museum, where they were prepared and sociated mammalian remains is a bone of stored. In November of the same year, the Pleistocene North American horse, Roosevelt and Burden' described some of Equus, which also once lived in the South- the material that they had collected, allot- west with early man. Evidently these ting it to a new species of the genus Tetra- fossil animals, now extinct in North Amer- meryx, namely: Tetrameryx onusrosagris. ica, persisted on this continent to within a In the spring of 1936, these two gentle- few thousands of years ago, as did many men made an additional exploration of the other typically "Pleistocene" mammals, Papago Spring cave, with the result that and the discovery at Papago Spring cave additional specimens of Tetrameryx were constitutes one more record of the post- discovered, so that we now have fairly Pleistocene persistence of Pleistocene types.
    [Show full text]