DOCSLIB.ORG

Ipsos MORI Lower Thames Crossing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ipsos MORI Lower Thames Crossing February 2017 Lower Thames Crossing Consultation Analysis of findings report FINAL VERSION 15-081993-01 Lower Thames Crossing Consultation | Final | Client Use Only | This work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the international quality standard for Market Research, ISO 20252:2012, and with the Ipsos MORI Terms and Conditions which can be found at http://www.ipsos-mori.com/terms. © Highways England 2017 Ipsos MORI | Lower Thames Crossing Consultation – Final Summary Report © 2017 Ipsos MORI – all rights reserved. The contents of this report constitute the sole and exclusive property of Ipsos MORI. Ipsos MORI retains all right, title and interest, including without limitation copyright, in or to any Ipsos MORI trademarks, technologies, methodologies, products, analyses, software and know-how included or arising out of this report or used in connection with the preparation of this report. No license under any copyright is hereby granted or implied. 15-081993-01 Lower Thames Crossing Consultation | Final | Internal and Client use | This work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the international quality standard for Market Research, ISO 20252:2012, and with the Ipsos MORI Terms and Conditions which can be found at http://www.ipsos-mori.com/terms. © Highways England 2017 15-081993-01 Lower Thames Crossing Consultation | Final | Client Use Only | This work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the international quality standard for Market Research, ISO 20252:2012, and with the Ipsos MORI Terms and Conditions which can be found at http://www.ipsos-mori.com/terms. © Highways England 2017 Ipsos MORI | Lower Thames Crossing Consultation – Final Summary Report Contents 1 Overview of the consultation .................................................................................................... 2 2 The consultation process ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Taking part in the consultation ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 The response form and consultation questions ............................................................................................ 7 2.3 The timing of the consultation ........................................................................................................................ 7 3 Responses to the consultation .................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Number of responses ........................................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 How members of the public heard about the consultation ...................................................................... 10 3.3 Bespoke responses ........................................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Organised campaign responses ..................................................................................................................... 10 3.5 Petitions ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 3.6 Analysis of responses ...................................................................................................................................... 13 3.7 Interpreting the consultation findings ......................................................................................................... 13 3.8 Free-text responses ......................................................................................................................................... 14 3.9 Reading this report .......................................................................................................................................... 15 4 Analysis of responses ............................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Views on the proposed location of the crossing ......................................................................................... 18 4.2 Views on the proposed routes north of the River Thames ........................................................................ 36 4.3 Views on the proposed routes south of the River Thames ....................................................................... 58 4.4 Views on the proposed scheme ..................................................................................................................... 79 4.5 Views on additional junctions ..................................................................................................................... 106 4.6 Further comments ......................................................................................................................................... 125 4.7 Organised campaigns ................................................................................................................................... 134 4.8 Petitions ......................................................................................................................................................... 149 APPENDICES Appendix A: Consultation questionnaire ............................................................................................................. 152 Appendix B: Technical note on coding................................................................................................................. 160 Appendix C: Stakeholder organisations ............................................................................................................... 163 Appendix D: Profile of individuals ........................................................................................................................ 176 Appendix E: Glossary of terms ............................................................................................................................... 178 15-081993-01 Lower Thames Crossing Consultation | Final | Client Use Only | This work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the international quality standard for Market Research, ISO 20252:2012, and with the Ipsos MORI Terms and Conditions which can be found at http://www.ipsos-mori.com/terms. © Highways England 2017 Ipsos MORI | Lower Thames Crossing Consultation – Final Summary Report 1 Overview of the consultation 15-081993-01 Lower Thames Crossing Consultation | Final | Client Use Only | This work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the international quality standard for Market Research, ISO 20252:2012, and with the Ipsos MORI Terms and Conditions which can be found at http://www.ipsos-mori.com/terms. © Highways England 2017 Ipsos MORI | Lower Thames Crossing Consultation – Final Summary Report 2 1 Overview of the consultation This report relates to the ‘Lower Thames Crossing Consultation’ run by Highways England from 26 January to 24 March 2016 1. In 2009, the Department for Transport (DfT) commissioned a study, which identified five possible locations for a Lower Thames crossing that would ease congestion at the existing Dartford Crossing. Of the five locations considered, the two most easterly locations were ruled out and not pursued any further. In 2012, the DfT looked at three locations for a new crossing of the Thames between Dartford and east of Gravesend. These were known as Locations A, B and C. There was also a proposal for Option C Variant (additionally widening the A229 between the M2 and the M20). In 2013 the DfT ran a public consultation inviting views on the need for a crossing and where to locate it (‘Options for a New Lower Thames Crossing’2). Following further investigation of the three options and taking into account responses from the 2013 consultation, the Government asked Highways England to consider options at two of these locations - Location A (a new proposed crossing close to the existing crossing at Dartford) and Location C (a new proposed crossing to connect the A2/M2 to the M25 via the A13), with or without C Variant. After thorough assessment, Highways England determined that Location C was its proposed solution (see Figure 1.1). During their assessment of the options for a new crossing, Highways England considered whether widening the A229 between the M2 and the M20 (known as C Variant) would be a necessary part of a new crossing. Their assessment has concluded that this upgrade would have limited benefits, high environmental impact and high cost and is not essential as part of a new crossing scheme. Highways England will give further consideration to this link separately as part of Highways England’s ongoing regional route planning. In order to gain the thoughts of members of the public and stakeholder organisations, Highways England decided to conduct a major public consultation. This consultation would cover not just attitudes to the proposed route, but alternative ideas and suggestions that participants may have about the proposed crossing. The Lower Thames Crossing Consultation covered a number of aspects relating to the proposal to build a new crossing across the River Thames and the connection of a new proposed crossing to the existing strategic road network. In particular, this consultation covered: The preference of Location C for a new crossing; Options for routes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament Elections 2014
    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party
    Royaume-Uni 73 élus Parti pour Démocrates libéraux Une indépendance de Parti conservateur ECR Parti travailliste PSE l’indépendance du Les Verts PVE ALDE l'Europe NI Royaume-Uni MELD 1. Vicky Ford MEP 1. Richard Howitt MEP 1. Andrew Duff MEP 1. Patrick O’Flynn 1. Paul Wiffen 1. Rupert Read 2. Geoffrey Van Orden 2. Alex Mayer 2. Josephine Hayes 2. Stuart Agnew MEP 2. Karl Davies 2. Mark Ereira-Guyer MEP 3. Sandy Martin 3. Belinda Brooks-Gordon 3. Tim Aker 3. Raymond Spalding 3. Jill Mills 3. David Campbell 4. Bhavna Joshi 4. Stephen Robinson 4. Michael Heaver 4. Edmond Rosenthal 4. Ash Haynes East of England Bannerman MEP 5. Paul Bishop 5. Michael Green 5. Andrew Smith 5. Rupert Smith 5. Marc Scheimann 4. John Flack 6. Naseem Ayub 6. Linda Jack 6. Mick McGough 6. Dennis Wiffen 6. Robert Lindsay 5. Tom Hunt 7. Chris Ostrowski 7. Hugh Annand 7. Andy Monk 7. Betty Wiffen 7. Fiona Radic 6. Margaret Simons 7. Jonathan Collett 1. Ashley Fox MEP 1. Clare Moody 1. Sir Graham Watson 1. William Dartmouth 1. David Smith 1. Molly Scott Cato 2. Julie Girling MEP 2. Glyn Ford MEP MEP 2. Helen Webster 2. Emily McIvor 3. James Cracknell 3. Ann Reeder 2. Kay Barnard 2. Julia Reid 3. Mike Camp 3. Ricky Knight 4. Georgina Butler 4. Hadleigh Roberts 3. Brian Mathew 3. Gawain Towler 4. Andrew Edwards 4. Audaye Elesady South West 5. Sophia Swire 5. Jude Robinson 4. Andrew Wigley 4. Tony McIntyre 5. Phil Dunn 5.
    [Show full text]
  • European Elections in the UK Media Briefing 7Th May 2014 UKIP and the 2014 European Parliament Elections
    European Elections in the UK Media Briefing 7th May 2014 UKIP and the 2014 European Parliament elections Dr Philip Lynch ([email protected]) & Dr Richard Whitaker ([email protected]) University of Leicester UKIP and the 2014 European Elections Philip Lynch ( [email protected], @drphiliplynch ) and Richard Whitaker ( [email protected], @rickwhitaker ) Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester UKIP go into the 2014 European elections in a far stronger position than they did five years earlier. The crucial differences are first, that UKIP have not experienced the decline in support in general election polling that they normally do after a European election. On the contrary, they are now consistently placed in third position in polls of general election vote intentions. Second, their ratings in polls of European election vote intention are some ten points higher on average than they were in the run up to the 2009 contest for seats in the European Parliament (EP). Third, they have more than double the number of members and a much better, even if still small base in local councils having secured 147 seats in the 2013 local elections. Fourth, while they have benefitted in the past from Conservative supporters lending UKIP their vote, they are in an even better position to do so this time around given that the Tories are now in government. On top of that, if UKIP’s campaign to win even more support from working class voters is successful, they will make headway in areas where Labour are traditionally strong. The presence of the Liberal Democrats in government alongside the collapse of the BNP add to the auspicious conditions for UKIP in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Yourlocalcouncillors2017.Pdf
    Parish Councils Who sits on what? Committee Meetings Blackmore, Hook End & Wyatts Green— Cllr. N. McCarthy, The All meetings listed start at 7pm and are open to the public. Haven, Hay Green Lane, Hook End, CM15 0NT Tel: 01277 822882 Audit Committee 2017 Doddinghurst — Cllr. Mrs. D. Dicker, 68 Lime Grove, Doddinghurst, Brentwood CM15 0QY Tel: 01277 823410 Chair: Cllr McCheyne Vice-Chair: Cllr Ms Rowlands June Herongate & Ingrave — Cllr. A. Kingsford, 12 Grange Close,, Cllrs: Chilvers, Mrs Fulcher, Hirst, Mrs Hones, Keeble, 13 Planning & Licensing Committee Ingrave, Brentwood CM13 3QP Tel: 07769 931982 Ingatestone & Fryerning — Cllr. P. Jeater, 118 High Street, Reed and Russell 19 Community, Health & Housing Committee Ingatestone CM4 0BA Tel: 01277 353315 20 Policy, Projects & Resources Committee Kelvedon Hatch — Cllr. S. Saunders, Stonecroft, School Road, 21 Ordinary Council Kelvedon Hatch, Brentwood CM15 0BG Tel: 01277 374009 Community, Health & Housing Committee 28 Environment & Enforcement Committee Mountnessing — Cllr A Stephenson, 149 Roman Road, Chair: Cllr Hossack Vice-Chair: Cllr Poppy Mountnessing, Brentwood CM15 0UD Tel: 01277 352726 July Navestock — Cllr Mrs. J. Savill, Shonks Mill House, Mill Lane, Cllrs: Clarke, Cloke, Mrs Davies, Mrs Hubbard, 3 Corporate Projects Scrutiny Committee Navestock RM14 1ET Tel: 01708 688649 Ms Rowlands, Ms Sanders and Wiles 18 Policy, Projects & Resources Committee Stondon Massey — Cllr. K. Pratt, 6 Cannons Mead, Stondon Massey, Brentwood CM15 0EF Tel: 01277 821577 19 Ordinary Council West Horndon
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Audit: European Elections 2019: What Will Happen in the East of England Region? Page 1 of 6
    Democratic Audit: European elections 2019: what will happen in the East of England region? Page 1 of 6 European elections 2019: what will happen in the East of England region? Traditionally this is a Conservative region at Westminster elections. Yet the East of England is strongly Eurosceptic and UKIP came top here in the last European Parliament elections in 2014, although the Tories hung on (just) to three seats. The Brexit Party now look certain to take over the UKIP vote and comfortably come first: on current polls they are guaranteed three of the region’s seven seats, and possibly one more. The latest polling indicates that Labour and the Liberal Democrats look assured of a single seat each. So the main uncertainty hangs on just how dominant the Brexit Party vote will be, whether the Tories’ slump means that they lose all of their seats here, and whether the Greens can pick up a seat. With voters able to cast only a single vote for a party list, the Democratic Audit team reviews likely outcomes for the parties and the main potentially electable candidates. Norwich cathedral. Picture: MemoryCatcher / 3041 images The East of England region juts into the North Sea and covers East Anglia down to the northern fringes of London. People here voted 56.5% to 43.5% for Leave in the Brexit referendum. Yet the area also includes some anti-Brexit cities such as Norwich and Cambridge. Last time UKIP won 35% of the vote and gained three MEPs (two of whom subsequently defected to other parties).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Contact Your Councillors
    September 2018 STRUCTURE OF THREE RIVERS DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNCIL Licensing Committee / Regulatory Policy and Resources Audit Committee Service Committees (X 2) Planning Committee Services Committee Committee Infrastructure, Housing and Economic Development Committee Leisure, Environment and Community Committee Lead Member for Economic Development Lead Member for Leisure Economic Development Arts development Rivertech Outdoor (woodlands, tree management, open spaces/grounds maintenance, play areas) Sustainability – promoting energy efficiency and ‘green’ matters Leisure/Community Grants Supporting better buses, public transport and cycling Play Development, Schemes and Rangers Transport Sport (pools, gyms, pitches, golf courses) and sports development Car Parking (provision, fines, permits, parking machines and contract with Hertsmere Council, Highways Leisure Contract Services for Young and Old People Lead Member for Infrastructure and Planning policy Indoor (community centres, theatre) Infrastructure Schemes Development Management Lead Member for Environmental Services Heritage Cemeteries and crematoria Listed Buildings Air Pollution Land Charges Refuse collection and recycling Land Drainage Street Cleaning and litter bin emptying Conservation areas, local listing Animal and Pest control Tree Protection Community Infrastructure Levy Lead Member for Community Safety and Partnerships Local Plan Public Health Strategy Neighbouthood Planning Health and social care provision and access Right to Build Register Grant aid, including the voluntary
    [Show full text]
  • MEP Contact Details
    Annex 2: MEP contact details Below is a list of all the UK MEPs, along with their room numbers and email addresses. There are multiple MEPs for each constituency. The list of English MEPs includes the counties that make up each constituency. You can also find their details online at www.europarl.org.uk/en/your-meps.html. Please write (letter or email) to one or more of the MEPs for your region. If you are sending a physical letter, international standard postage to Belgium costs £1.00 and takes 3-5 days to arrive. All MEPs can be reached in writing at: [Insert MEP name here] European Parliament Bât. Altiero Spinelli [Insert the MEP’s room number here] 60 rue Wiertz B-1047 Brussels, Belgium Constituency MEP Name Room Email No. Northern Ireland Ms Martina Anderson (Sinn Fein) T0514 [email protected] 5 Ms Diane Dodds (Democratic 11G20 [email protected] Unionist Party) 6 Mr Jim Nicholson (Ulster 04M04 [email protected] Unionist Party) 7 Scotland Mr David Martin (Labour) 13G15 [email protected] 7 Mr Ian Hudghton (SNP) 04F35 [email protected] 3 Mr David Coburn (UKIP) 03F15 [email protected] 1 Mrs Catherine Stihler (Labour) 13G35 [email protected] 5 Dr Ian Duncan (Conservative) 06M08 [email protected] 7 Mr Alyn Smith (SNP) 04F34 [email protected] 3 Wales Ms Jill Evans (Plaid Cymru) 04F37 [email protected] 4 Constituency MEP Name Room Email No. Mr Nathan Gill (UKIP) 03F15 [email protected] 5 Ms Kay Swinburne 04M08 kayswinburnemep@welshconservativ es.com (Conservative)
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Council, 24/06/2015 19:00
    Thurrock: A place of opportunity, enterprise and excellence, where individuals, communities and businesses flourish Council To the Members of Thurrock Council The next meeting of the Council will be held at 7.00 pm on 24 June 2015 Council Chamber, Civic Offices, New Road, Grays, Essex, RM17 6SL Membership of the Council: Sue Gray (Mayor) Cathy Kent (Deputy Mayor) Tim Aker Shane Hebb Barry Palmer Chris Baker Terence Hipsey Jane Pothecary James Baker Victoria Holloway Robert Ray Jan Baker Barry Johnson Joycelyn Redsell Clare Baldwin Roy Jones Barbara Rice Terry Brookes Tom Kelly Gerard Rice Russell Cherry John Kent Andrew Roast Colin Churchman Martin Kerin Peter Smith Mark Coxshall Charlie Key Graham Snell Leslie Gamester Steve Liddiard Richard Speight Oliver Gerrish Brian Little Deborah Stewart Robert Gledhill Susan Little Michael Stone Yash Gupta (MBE) Sue MacPherson Pauline Tolson Graham Hamilton Ben Maney Kevin Wheeler Garry Hague Tunde Ojetola Lynn Worrall James Halden Bukky Okunade David Bull Councillor Sue Gray Interim Chief Executive Mayor of Thurrock Agenda published on: 16 June 2015 Agenda Open to Public and Press Page 1 Apologies for absence 2 Minutes 9 - 22 To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 27 May 2015. 3 Items of Urgent Business To receive additional items that the Mayor is of the opinion should be considered as a matter of urgency, in accordance with Section 100B (4) (b) of the Local Government Act 1972. 4 Declaration of Interests To receive any declaration of interests from Members. 5 Announcements on behalf of the Mayor or the Leader of the Council 6 Questions from Members of the Public 23 - 24 In accordance with Chapter 2, Part 2 (Rule 14) of the Council’s Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Nuttall
    Report on UKIP NEC meeting January 9th 2017 Members present: Paul Nuttall MEP (Party LeaDer) (PN), Paul OakDen (Party Chairman) (PO), DaviD Sprason (DS), Alan Bown (AB), John Bickley (JB), Toby Coke (TC), Fiona Mills (FM), Steve Crowther (SC), Mick McGough (MM), Elizabeth Jones (EJ), Marion Mason (MAM), Anish Patel (AP), Paul Oakley (PJO), Katie Fanning (KF) (from 2.30pm). Also present: ADam RicharDson (Party Secretary) (AR), Jonathan Arnott MEP (General Secretary) (JA), Peter Whittle (PW). The meeting started at 1.14pm. Apologies were receiveD from Douglas Carswell, and some members were expected to be late Due to inDustrial action on the LonDon UnDergrounD. The meeting began with brief introductions for the benefit of the newly- elected members. Motion: To approve the minutes of the previous meeting. Proposed by DS, seconDed by AB. Carried by 5-0 with 7 abstentions (not present at previous meeting). JB askeD the Committee to thank Rob McWhirter for his work when he was an NEC member and his work on the Technical Sub-Committee. Motion: To thank Rob McWhirter for his service to the Party during his time on the NEC. Proposed by JB, SC. Carried by 12-0 with no abstentions. The Spring Conference this year will be on Friday February 17th anD will take place at the Macron Stadium in Bolton. There will be a Gala Dinner on the Friday night. On the Saturday, whilst the main Conference room is not available, we will have a Day of local government-focuseD speakers. We anticipate a real opportunity for the Party at the (anticipateD) Leigh by- election.
    [Show full text]
  • Provided by the Author(S) and University College Dublin Library in Accordance with Publisher Policies
    Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title Tweeting Europe: A text-analytic approach to unveiling the content of political actors' Twitter activities in the European Parliament Authors(s) Cross, James P.; Greene, Derek; Belford, Mark Publication date 2016-06-25 Conference details 6th Annual General Conference of the European Political Science Association (EPSA'16), Brussels, Belgium, 23-25 June 2016 Link to online version http://www.epsanet.org/conference-2016/ Item record/more information http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7805 Downloaded 2021-10-01T20:05:54Z The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters! (@ucd_oa) © Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. Tweeting Europe: A text-analytic approach to unveiling the content of political actors’ Twitter activities in the European Parliament Mark Belford⇤ Derek Greene† James P. Cross‡ June 17, 2016 Abstract Twitter is an important platform for communication and is frequently used by Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to campaign and en- gage in discussion with constituents and colleagues in the parliament. Ex- amining the issues that MEPs talk about on Twitter can thus inform us about their political priorities. Topic modelling aims to summarise a corpus of documents by capturing the underlying hidden structure of the data and pre- senting the user with an overview of the key subjects and themes discussed in the corpus, known as topics. This paper aims to quantify and explore the content that MEPs pay attention to on Twitter by applying a new en- semble approach for topic modelling which involves applying two layers of Non-Negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF).
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Template
    Minutes of the Meeting of the Annual Council held on 25 May 2016 at 7.00 pm Present: Sue Gray, Councillors Cathy Kent, Tim Aker, John Allen, Chris Baker, James Baker, Jan Baker, Clare Baldwin, Russell Cherry, Colin Churchman, Gary Collins, Mark Coxshall, Jack Duffin, Tony Fish, Leslie Gamester, Oliver Gerrish, Robert Gledhill, Garry Hague, James Halden, Graham Hamilton, Shane Hebb, Clifford Holloway, Victoria Holloway, Roy Jones, Tom Kelly, John Kent, Martin Kerin, Steve Liddiard, Brian Little, Susan Little, Sue MacPherson, Ben Maney, Tunde Ojetola, Bukky Okunade, Terry Piccolo, Jane Pothecary, David Potter, Joycelyn Redsell, Barbara Rice, Gerard Rice, Sue Sammons, Angela Sheridan, Peter Smith, Graham Snell, Luke Spillman, Deborah Stewart, Michael Stone, Pauline Tolson, Aaron Watkins and Kevin Wheeler In attendance: Reverend Canon Darren Barlow, Mayor’s Chaplain Lyn Carpenter, Chief Executive Steve Cox, Corporate Director of Environment and Place Roger Harris, Corporate Director of Adults, Housing and Health Sean Clark, Director of Finance & IT Jackie Hinchliffe, Director of HR, OD & Transformation Fiona Taylor, Director of Legal and Democratic Services David Lawson, Deputy Head of Legal & Monitoring Officer Karen Wheeler, Head of Strategy, Communications and Customer Service Matthew Boulter, Principal Democratic Services Officer Jenny Shade, Senior Democratic Services Officer Before the start of the Meeting, all present were advised that the meeting may be filmed and was being recorded, with the audio recording to be made available on the Council’s website. The Mayor invited Reverend Canon Darren Barlow to lead those present in prayer. Sue Gray, the Mayor of Thurrock, took the Chair for Minute Nos. 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Cover with Photo – Balloon Or Elections Logo
    1 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT INFORMATION OFFICE IN THE UK MEDIA GUIDE 2014 - 2019 This guide provides journalists with information on: The European Parliament and its activities The 2009 and 2014 European elections A Who’s Who in the European Parliament Press contacts What the UK Office does Björn Kjellström Olga Dziewulska Head of UK Office Press Attachée Tel: 020 7227 4325 Tel: 020 7227 4335 Disclaimer: All information in this guide was true and correct at the time of publication. Updated information can be found on our website. www.europarl.org.uk @EPinUK 2 3 Introduction by Björn Kjellström, Head of the European Parliament Information Office in the UK Every 5 years over 500 million people in the EU have the power to choose who will represent them in the European Parliament, the world's most open and only directly elected international parliament. Our mission is to raise awareness of its role and powers, of how political differences within it are played out and of how decisions taken by its Members affect the UK. These decisions have a huge impact on everyday life and it makes a big difference who decides on our behalf. Since journalists and the media in the UK play a key role in informing citizens about how the work of the European Parliament affects them, we hope that you will find this guide useful. 4 The European Parliament Information Office in the UK Our Role: We do our best to reach as broad a spectrum of society as we can – both face to face, online and in print.
    [Show full text]