DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 15, Issue 21 Monday, July 5, 1999

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 15, Issue 21 Monday, July 5, 1999 THE VIRGINIA REGISTER INFORMATION PAGE THE VIRGINIA REGISTER is an official state publication issued period; (ii) the Governor exercises his authority to require the agency to every other week throughout the year. Indexes are published quarterly, provide for additional public comment, in which event the regulation, and the last index of the year is cumulative. THE VIRGINIA REGISTER unless withdrawn, becomes effective on the date specified, which shall has several functions. The new and amended sections of regulations, be after the expiration of the period for which the Governor has provided both as proposed and as finally adopted, are required by law to be for additional public comment; (iii) the Governor and the General published in THE VIRGINIA REGISTER OF REGULATIONS. In Assembly exercise their authority to suspend the effective date of a addition, THE VIRGINIA REGISTER is a source of other information regulation until the end of the next regular legislative session; or (iv) the about state government, including all emergency regulations and agency suspends the regulatory process, in which event the regulation, executive orders issued by the Governor, the Virginia Tax Bulletin issued unless withdrawn, becomes effective on the date specified, which shall periodically by the Department of Taxation, and notices of public be after the expiration of the 30-day public comment period. hearings and open meetings of state agencies. Proposed regulatory action may be withdrawn by the promulgating ADOPTION, AMENDMENT, AND REPEAL OF agency at any time before the regulation becomes final. REGULATIONS EMERGENCY REGULATIONS An agency wishing to adopt, amend, or repeal regulations must first If an agency demonstrates that (i) there is an immediate threat to the publish in the Virginia Register a notice of intended regulatory action; a public’s health or safety; or (ii) Virginia statutory law, the appropriation basis, purpose, substance and issues statement; an economic impact act, federal law, or federal regulation requires a regulation to take effect analysis prepared by the Department of Planning and Budget; the no later than (a) 280 days from the enactment in the case of Virginia or agency’s response to the economic impact analysis; a summary; a notice federal law or the appropriation act, or (b) 280 days from the effective giving the public an opportunity to comment on the proposal; and the text date of a federal regulation, it then requests the Governor’s approval to of the proposed regulation. adopt an emergency regulation. The emergency regulation becomes Following publication of the proposal in the Virginia Register, the operative upon its adoption and filing with the Registrar of Regulations, promulgating agency receives public comments for a minimum of 60 unless a later date is specified. Emergency regulations are limited to days. The Governor reviews the proposed regulation to determine if it is addressing specifically defined situations and may not exceed 12 months necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare, and if it is in duration. Emergency regulations are published as soon as possible in clearly written and easily understandable. If the Governor chooses to the Register. comment on the proposed regulation, his comments must be transmitted During the time the emergency status is in effect, the agency may to the agency and the Registrar no later than 15 days following the proceed with the adoption of permanent regulations through the usual completion of the 60-day public comment period. The Governor’s procedures. To begin promulgating the replacement regulation, the comments, if any, will be published in the Virginia Register. Not less agency must (i) file the Notice of Intended Regulatory Action with the than 15 days following the completion of the 60-day public comment Registrar within 60 days of the effective date of the emergency period, the agency may adopt the proposed regulation. regulation; and (ii) file the proposed regulation with the Registrar within The appropriate standing committee of each branch of the General 180 days of the effective date of the emergency regulation. If the agency Assembly may meet during the promulgation or final adoption process chooses not to adopt the regulations, the emergency status ends when and file an objection with the Registrar and the promulgating agency. the prescribed time limit expires. The objection will be published in the Virginia Register. Within 21 days STATEMENT after receipt by the agency of a legislative objection, the agency shall file a response with the Registrar, the objecting legislative committee, and The foregoing constitutes a generalized statement of the procedures the Governor. to be followed. For specific statutory language, it is suggested that Article 2 (§ 9-6.14:7.1 et seq.) of Chapter 1.1:1 of the Code of Virginia be When final action is taken, the agency again publishes the text of the examined carefully. regulation as adopted, highlighting all changes made to the proposed regulation and explaining any substantial changes made since CITATION TO THE VIRGINIA REGISTER publication of the proposal. A 30-day final adoption period begins upon final publication in the Virginia Register. The Virginia Register is cited by volume, issue, page number, and date. 12:8 VA.R. 1096-1106 January 8, 1996, refers to Volume 12, The Governor may review the final regulation during this time and, if Issue 8, pages 1096 through 1106 of the Virginia Register issued on he objects, forward his objection to the Registrar and the agency. In January 8, 1996. addition to or in lieu of filing a formal objection, the Governor may suspend the effective date of a portion or all of a regulation until the end "THE VIRGINIA REGISTER OF REGULATIONS" (USPS-001831) is of the next regular General Assembly session by issuing a directive published bi-weekly, with quarterly cumulative indices published in signed by a majority of the members of the appropriate standing January, April, July and October, for $100 per year by the Virginia Code committees and the Governor. The Governor’s objection or suspension Commission, General Assembly Building, Capitol Square, Richmond, of the regulation, or both, will be published in the Virginia Register. If the Virginia 23219. Telephone (804) 786-3591. Periodical Postage Rates Governor finds that changes made to the proposed regulation have Paid at Richmond, Virginia. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to substantial impact, he may require the agency to provide an additional THE VIRGINIA REGISTER OF REGULATIONS, 910 CAPITOL 30-day public comment period on the changes. Notice of the additional STREET, 2ND FLOOR, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219. public comment period required by the Governor will be published in the The Virginia Register of Regulations is published pursuant to Article 7 Virginia Register. (§ 9-6.14:22 et seq.) of Chapter 1.1:1 of Title 9 of the Code of Virginia. The agency shall suspend the regulatory process for 30 days when it Individual copies, if available, may be purchased for $4.00 each from the receives requests from 25 or more individuals to solicit additional public Registrar of Regulations. comment, unless the agency determines that the changes have minor or inconsequential impact. Members of the Virginia Code Commission: Joseph V. Gartlan, Jr., A regulation becomes effective at the conclusion of the 30-day final Chairman; W. Tayloe Murphy, Jr., Vice Chairman; Robert L. adoption period, or at any other later date specified by the promulgating Calhoun; Bernard S. Cohen; Jay W. DeBoer; Frank S. Ferguson; agency, unless (i) a legislative objection has been filed, in which event J. Randy Forbes; James E. Kulp; E.M. Miller, Jr.; James B. the regulation, unless withdrawn, becomes effective on the date Wilkinson. specified, which shall be after the expiration of the 21-day extension Staff of the Virginia Register: Jane D. Chaffin, Registrar of Regulations. PUBLICATION SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES This schedule is available on the Register's Internet home page (http://legis.state.va.us/codecomm/register/regindex.htm). July 1999 through June 2000 Volume:Issue Material Submitted By Noon* Will Be Published On 15:21 June 16, 1999 July 5, 1999 15:22 June 30, 1999 July 19, 1999 15:23 July 14, 1999 August 2, 1999 15:24 July 28, 1999 August 16, 1999 15:25 August 11, 1999 August 30, 1999 15:26 August 25, 1999 September 13, 1999 FINAL INDEX - Volume 15 October 1999 16:1 September 8, 1999 September 27, 1999 16:2 September 22, 1999 October 11, 1999 16:3 October 6, 1999 October 25, 1999 16:4 October 20, 1999 November 8, 1999 16:5 November 3, 1999 November 22, 1999 16:6 November 16, 1999 (Tuesday) December 6, 1999 16:7 December 1, 1999 December 20, 1999 INDEX 1 - Volume 16 January 2000 16:8 December 14, 1999 (Tuesday) January 3, 2000 16:9 December 28, 1999 (Tuesday) January 17, 2000 16:10 January 12, 2000 January 31, 2000 16:11 January 26, 2000 February 14, 2000 16:12 February 9, 2000 February 28, 2000 16:13 February 23, 2000 March 13, 2000 16:14 March 8, 2000 March 27, 2000 INDEX 2 - Volume 16 April 2000 16:15 March 22, 2000 April 10, 2000 16:16 April 5, 2000 April 24, 2000 16:17 April 19, 2000 May 8, 2000 16:18 May 3, 2000 May 22, 2000 16:19 May 17, 2000 June 5, 2000 16:20 May 31, 2000 June 19, 2000 INDEX 3 - Volume 16 July 2000 *Filing deadlines are Wednesdays unless otherwise specified. Virginia Register of Regulations TABLE OF CONTENTS CUMULATIVE TABLE OF VIRGINIA 18 VAC 90-20-460).......................................................2635 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTIONS BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY ADOPTED, AMENDED, OR REPEALED Regulations Governing the Practice of Psychology Cumulative Table..........................................................2623 (amending 18 VAC 125-20-10, 18 VAC 125-20-30, 18 VAC 125-20-40, 18 VAC 125-20-80, 18 VAC 125-20-120, 18 VAC NOTICES OF INTENDED REGULATORY 125-20-130, 18 VAC 125-20-150, 18 VAC 125-20-160, and 18 VAC 125-20-170; adding 18 VAC 125-20-41, 18 VAC ACTION 125-20-42, 18 VAC 125-20-54, 18 VAC 125-20-55, 18 VAC 125-20-56, and 18 VAC 125-20-65; repealing 18 VAC 125- TITLE 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary of Public Comments to State Water Control Board Adequacy of NWP 12 to Ensure Compliance with State Standards
    Summary of Public Comments to State Water Control Board Adequacy of NWP 12 to Ensure Compliance with State Standards Prepared by Wild Virginia Dominion Pipeline Monitoring Coalition (DPMC) August 15, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 7 I. Overall Body of Comments and Organization of the Online Records . 10 II. Waterbodies Discussed . 12 Mountain Valley Pipeline New River Basin Kimballton Branch . 14 (tributary to Stony Creek) Stony Creek . 15 (aka Big Stony Creek - tributary to New River) Little Stony Creek . 15 (tributary to New River) Doe Creek . 16 (tributary to New River) Greenbriar Branch . 17 (tributary to Sinking Creek) Unnamed Tributary to Grass Run . 17 (tributary to Grass Run) Sinking Creek . 18 (tributary to New River) James River Basin Craig Creek . 19 (tributary to James River) Roanoke River Basin Bottom Creek, Mill Creek, and Tributaries . 20 (tributary to South Fork Roanoke River) South Fork Roanoke River . 22 (tributary to Roanoke River) Mill Creek (Montogomery Co.) . 23 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Bottom Spring . 24 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Salmon Spring . 24 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) 2 Bradshaw Creek . 25 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) Flatwoods Branch . 25 (tributary to North Fork Roanoke River) North Fork Roanoke River . 25 (tributary to Roanoke River) North Fork Blackwater River . 26 (tributary to Blackwater River) Green Creek . 27 (tributary to South Fork Blackwater River) Teels Creek . 27 (tributary to Little Creek) Little Creek . 28 (tributary to Blackwater River) Blackwater River . 28 (tributary to Roanoke River - Smith Mtn. Lake) Pigg River . 29 (tributary to Roanoke River - Leesville Lake) Roanoke River .
    [Show full text]
  • Signal Knob Northern Massanutten Mountain Catback Mountain Browns Run Southern Massanutten Mountain Five Areas of Around 45,000 Acres on the Lee the West
    Sherman Bamford To: [email protected] <[email protected] cc: Sherman Bamford <[email protected]> > Subject: NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage draft multi-species habitat conservation plan comments - attachments 2 12/13/2011 03:32 PM Sherman Bamford Forests Committee Chair Virginia Chapter – Sierra Club P.O. Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015 [email protected] (540) 343-6359 December 13, 2011 Regional Director, Midwest Region Attn: Lisa Mandell U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990 Bloomington, MN 55437-1458 Email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Mandell: On behalf of the Virginia Chapter of Sierra Club, the following are attachments to our previously submitted comments on the the NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage (“NiSource”) draft multi-species habitat conservation plan (“HCP”) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (“Service”) draft environmental impact statement (“EIS”). Draft of Virginia Mountain Treasures For descriptions and maps only. The final version was published in 2008. Some content may have changed between 2007 and 2008. Sherman Bamford Sherman Bamford PO Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015-1102 (540) 343-6359 [email protected] Virginia’s Mountain Treasures ART WORK DRAWING The Unprotected Wildlands of the George Washington National Forest A report by the Wilderness Society Cover Art: First Printing: Copyright by The Wilderness Society 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202)-843-9453 Wilderness Support Center 835 East Second Avenue Durango, CO 81302 (970) 247-8788 Founded in 1935, The Wilderness Society works to protect America’s wilderness and to develop a nation- wide network of wild lands through public education, scientific analysis, and advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • SR V18 Index.Pdf (969.3Kb)
    Index to Volume 18 Rachael Garrity A Biedma, 115 A Girls Life Before the War, 81 Bimini, 119 Adams, President John, I 0, 13-14 Blacksburg, Va., 25, 30, 57, 80, 82-85, 91 Alabama, IOI Blue Ridge Mountains, 82 Alien and Sedition Acts, I 0 Boston, Barbara, 112 Alonso de Chavez, 115 Botetourt County, Va., 25, 27, 29, 54, 63, Alonso de Santa Cruz, 111-113 65, 79 Allegheny Mountains, 82 Bouleware, Jane Grace Preston, 78 American Declaration of Independence, 9 Boulware, Aubin Lee, 78 American Indians, 4, 52-54, 58, 66, 82, Bradenton, Fla., I 06 100, 105, 107-108 Brady, Mathew, 84 American Revolution, 58, 72, 73 Braham, John, 34 Apafalaya, I 0 I Brain, Jeffrey, I 05 Appalachia, I 0 I, I 04 Breckenridge, Robert, 40 Appalachian Mountains, 3, 20, 55 Brissot, Jacques Pierre, 16 Appalachian Trail, 110 Bristol, Tenn.Na., 99, I 09, 124 Arkansas, I 05 Bristol News, 126-127 Augusta County, Va., 25-27, 30, 33, 35, British North America, 55 37-38,40,43-44,52,54, 71 Brown, John, 91, 135 Avenel House Plantation, 81 Brown, John Mason, 135 Brown, John Meredith, 135 B Brunswick County, Va., 40 Bahaman Channel, 118-119 Buchanan, Colonel John, 27, 30, 35, 41, Baird (Beard), John, 40-41 52-53 Baldwin, Caroline (Cary) Marx, 78 Buchanan, Va., 27, 38, 52-53 Bank of the United States, 6 Bullett, Captain, 62-65 Bardstown, Ky., 3, 17 Bullpasture River, 54 Barreis, David, I 05 Bureau ofAmerican Ethnology, 110 Barrens, The, Ky., 13, 17 Burke County, N.C., I 03 Bassett, Colonel, 65 Burwell, Letitia M., 81-83, 86, 90 Batson, Mordecai, 60 Bussell Island, Tenn., 123 Battle
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Migration from Augusta County, Virginia, to Kentucky, 1777-1800
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1987 "Peopling the Western Country": A Study of Migration from Augusta County, Virginia, to Kentucky, 1777-1800 Wendy Sacket College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Sacket, Wendy, ""Peopling the Western Country": A Study of Migration from Augusta County, Virginia, to Kentucky, 1777-1800" (1987). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625418. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ypv2-mw79 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "PEOPLING THE WESTERN COUNTRY": A STUDY OF MIGRATION FROM AUGUSTA COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TO KENTUCKY, 1777-1800 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Wendy Ellen Sacket 1987 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, December, 1987 John/Se1by *JU Thad Tate ies Whittenburg i i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................. iv LIST OF T A B L E S ...............................................v LIST OF MAPS . ............................................. vi ABSTRACT................................................... v i i CHAPTER I. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE LITERATURE, PURPOSE, AND ORGANIZATION OF THE PRESENT STUDY .
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    William2 Gay of the Little Calfpasture 1 PREFACE This is an excerpt from a much longer report which represents my current thinking on the many Scotch- Irish families surnamed Gay who pioneered in the Valley of Virginia (the Shenandoah) in the 1740s. This excerpt is focused on William2 Gay (a.k.a. William-A Gay), one of the two such Williams (the other I call William-B) who settled on the Little Calfpasture River in the present county of Rockbridge. In order to call my subject William2 Gay (implying that his parents were the first immigrants to America of his line), I must logically provide some account of those parents, and this I have done below, although it must be noted that they remain rather shadowy figures—theoretical constructs based largely on onomastic analysis of the child-naming patterns in the families of their putative descendants. The children of this first couple, whom I hypothesize were named John1 and Agnes, were, in probable order of birth: William, James, John, Robert, Samuel, and Eleanor. Of these, besides William, the only one for whom I have included material here from my plenary report is Eleanor, and that only because her inclusion crucially impacts the structure of this family, and also uniquely brings into play evidence of its origins in Ulster—northern Ireland—probably either in the counties of Donegal or Londonderry. The main line of this report, as well as the plenary report from which it is excerpted, consists of a series of linked family sketches, in descendancy order. Each sketch covers one man, or one woman, their spouse or spouses, and their set or sets of children.
    [Show full text]
  • James River Action Plan (J-RAP)
    James River Action Plan (J-RAP) By: Reid Williams, Allie Kaltenbach, Michaella Becker, Andrew Ames Table of Contents Mission Statement……………………………………………………………………………. .2 Background…………………………………………………………………………………… 2 History……………………………………………………………………………………….... 2 Policies and Mandates in Place……………………………………………………………….. 3 Problems…………………………………………………………………………………….… 6 Problem 1: Harmful Algae blooms (blue algae)….……………………………....…… 8 Goals……………………………………………………………………….….. 8 Problem 2: Bacteria levels………………………………………………………….…. 9 Goals…………………………………………………………………………. 10 Problem 3: Wildlife/Habitat degradation……….......…………………………...…… 10 Goals…………………………………………………………………………. 10 J-RAP Summary of Goals..………………………………………………………………….. 11 References……………………………………………………………………………..…….. 12 1 Mission Statement: Our mission is to attain sufficient water quality standards for wildlife and recreation in the James River Basin of southern Virginia by the year 2030. Background: The James River Watershed is over 10,000 square miles in size and comprises of three sections, the Upper, Middle and Lower James (Middle James Roundtable). This watershed is home to about 3 million people. It emcompasses 15,000 miles of tributaries which include the Appomattox River, Chickahominy River, Cowpasture River, Hardware River, Jackson River, Maury River, Rivanna River, Tye River (James River Association). The James River is the largest tributary to the Chesapeake Bay (James River Association). History: The first inhabitants along the James water were nomadic hunters starting at least 15,000 years ago. Between about 10,000 to 3,000 years ago a collection of tribes described as Archaic Native Americans lived along the James river. They continued to be nomadic as they moved along the Basin seasonally, following animal migrations and plant growth cycles. This nomadic movement, along with the reasonable population, decreased the stress on the Basin due to human activities. It lasted for thousands of years because the way these tribes interacted with the watershed was sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Non Minimum Roads by Watershed Condition Class
    Non Minimum Roads by Watershed Condition Class USFS_COND Not Associated with a Watershed RTE_NO ROUTE_NAME Length HUC12_NAME FH561.1 VA.623 1.49 FH561.2 VA.623 2.864371 FH598 VA.818&VA.682 0.020837 FH554 VA.625 1.678439 444C MILAM 0.013939 265 DRY RIVER WORK CENTER 0.019088 265A DRY RIVER WORK CENTER 0.049903 4040 TENN 0.227884 49030 SUGAR CAMP 0.463635 4041 VALLEY 0.076535 FH580 VA.663 2.7653 FH WV589 CO15, CO15/3 0.354756 USFS_COND Functioning at Risk RTE_NO ROUTE_NAME Length HUC12_NAME 765B SNAKE DEN SPUR 0.212038 Elk Creek-James River 35 PETITES GAP 0.03242 Otter Creek-James River 35 PETITES GAP 3.982893 Elk Creek-James River 361C CIGAR RIDGE 1.10046 Mill Creek-Cowpasture River 39 PEDLAR RIVER 6.768137 Lynchburg Reservoir-Pedlar River 39 PEDLAR RIVER 5.554507 Browns Creek-Pedlar River 1037 BROAD RUN 0.747509 Skidmore Fork-North River 104E PATTERSON R-O-W 0.193824 Upper South River 10800 HAZELNUT 0.625286 Trout Creek-Craig Creek 10800A HAZELNUT SPUR A 0.331626 Trout Creek-Craig Creek P7 PATTERSON SPECIAL USE 0.295912 Mill Creek-Craig Creek 225A BLACKS RUN 2.506454 Black Run-Dry River 39E THIRTEEN CROSSINGS 3.42817 Browns Creek-Pedlar River 1283 CAL CLARK 0.172632 Upper South River 1283 CAL CLARK 1.313025 Irish Creek FH589 VA.636 3.465131 Upper Johns Creek FH563 VA.615 8.545137 Hunting Camp Creek FH575 VA.641 2.385472 Tract Fork 1584A SPICK AND SPAN SPUR 0.306516 Buffalo Branch-Middle River 151R STONEY SWAMP SALE 0.322371 Rough Run-South Fork South Branch Potomac River 151R STONEY SWAMP SALE 0.458325 Hawes Run-South Fork South Branch
    [Show full text]
  • Published by and for Residents of KENDAL at Lexington Vol. 18, No. 6, June 2018
    CONNECTIONS Published by and for Residents of KENDAL at Lexington www.kalex.kendal.org Vol. 18, No. 6, June 2018 ing and mulching each year. Resident Heather Marion just completed this annual effort. Interest in restoring the garden began with a volunteer crew of Kendal residents and staff who grubbed out invasive privet, honeysuckle and other plants from the boxwoods. A local master mason repaired several large cracks in the stone walls. The residents’ horticulture and landscap- ing committee took on the garden, and it became a project in 2011. In an important boost to the effort, resident Lloyd Craighill volunteered to build three attrac- tive garden benches and a table of white oak. A unique place that binds together the Sun- For a centerpiece, resident Jim McMillan donat- nyside Farm of long ago with today’s Kendal at ed a handsome sundial and added two other gar- Lexington is maintained today in honor of the den ornaments. Bartenstein, Webster and Anderson families, To level and steady the benches and to pre- who gave the property for the KaLex campus. vent their legs from rotting, masonry bases were Miss Helen Webster developed a terraced needed. The committee obtained bids for this flowerbed behind Sunnyside House about 1950. work and awarded the job to Mike Orrison. He It is now called The Secret Garden. At first the provided an attractive plan using a variety of stone wall-enclosed garden was surrounded by pavers. The plan also included a gravel circle young box bushes; they continued to thrive and for the sundial.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Reports, Chessie Trail: Rockbridge County, Virginia
    Survey Reports Chessie Trail Rockbridge County, Virginia Thomas C. Gentner Jr. Anthropology 378 Prof. McDaniel Dec. 16, 1982 VIRGINIA RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARCHAEOLOGY SITE SURVEY FORM Name llf site Quasi ' s Site Site number: Chessie 34 Cultural affiliation: Early 19th Century Tq)c of site Historic Ruin Map rcforcrn:e: USGS 7 • 5 min. quadrangle-Lexington Latitude o " north. Longitude o " west. ll.T.M. Zone -1-7- Easting 6J9J20 Northing l:J.1 . ~fi9~0 . (or distance from printed edge of map : bottom edge -- : n 1 e ge __) Owner/address: Maurice Smith Tenant/address: Altitude toward investigation: Favorable Informant/address: Surveyed by : T. Gentner Jr. Date:December 16, 1982 General surroundings: Approximately a mile to a mile and a quarter from the intersection of route 10J7 and route 763, along the Chessie Trail. 400' north of the Chessie Trail. Structural walls made out of· out stone. Nearest water: nature, direction and distance: Maury River, 600' south Dimension of site: 100' by 100' Description : depth, soil, collecting conditions: Inside of structure, four inches of topsoil on top of sterile clay; outside of structure, four inches of top soil on top of one inch of charcoal on top of sterile clay. Collecting were good to excellent throughout. Specimens collected: kinds, quantities. materials: noted: 51 nails; 6 pieces of bone; 4 pieces of metal; 2 spikes; 2 pieces of undecorated whiteware; 1 piece of hinge; 1 piece of wire. Specimens reported . owners. address: Other ducu ml'ntatllll\ : reports. ·historical data : (\1n dition : erosion. cultivation , ex cavation . comtruction : Recommendations: Intensive Testing Photo: Map: Recorded by: TCG Date: December 16, 1982 (Use reverse side of sheet and additional p~ges for sketches of site and artifacts) Thomas Gentner Between September 14, 1982 and December 19, 1982, the 1 students of the Anthropology 378 class of Washington and Lee University , under the instruction of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Effective Basins Funding Allocations Rationale May 18, 2020
    Most Effective Basins Funding Allocations Rationale May 18, 2020 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office Most Effective Basins Funding In the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Appropriations Conference Report, an increase to the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) Budget was provided in the amount of $6 million for “state-based implementation in the most effective basins.” This document describes the methodology EPA followed to establish the most effective use of these funds and the best locations for these practices to be implemented to make the greatest progress toward achieving water quality standards in the Chesapeake Bay. The most effective basins to reduce the effects of excess nutrient loading to the Bay were determined considering two factors: cost effectiveness and load effectiveness. Cost effectiveness was considered as a factor to assure these additional funds result in state-based implementation of practices that achieve the greatest benefit to water quality overall. It was evaluated by looking at what the jurisdictions have reported in their Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs) as the focus of their upcoming efforts, and by looking at the average cost per pound of reduction for BMP implementation by sector. Past analyses of cost per pound of reduction have shown that reducing nitrogen is less costly by far than reducing phosphorus1. Based on that fact, EPA determined that the focus of this evaluation would be to target nitrogen reductions in the watershed. Evaluating the load reduction targets in all the jurisdictions’ Phase III WIPs shows that the agricultural sector is targeted for 86 percent of the overall reductions identified to meet the 2025 targets collectively set by the jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Water Quality in the Rivers and Tributaries of the Shenandoah River Watershed
    The Status of Water Quality in the Rivers and Tributaries of the Shenandoah River Watershed Final Report (Third Edition) August, 2007 A paper prepared by Charles Vandervoort of the Friends of the Shenandoah River with the cooperation of the Volunteer Monitors of the Shenandoah River Watershed. Table of Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................................................vii Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................................................................................xi Chapter 1: Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................................1 Background..................................................................................................................................................................................1 Methodology ...............................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • August 24, 2020 at 5:30 P.M
    AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HELD IN THE ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING AT 150 SOUTH MAIN STREET, LEXINGTON, VIRGINIA ON MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 2020 AT 5:30 P.M. *** Please take notice, that the scheduled 4:30 p.m. Work Session was cancelled. *** BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: D. E. LYONS R. W. DAY L.E. AYERS D.B. MCDANIEL (Participated Remotely) A.J. “JAY” LEWIS, II. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: SPENCER H. SUTER COUNTY ATTORNEY: VICKIE L. HUFFMAN *** CALLED TO ORDER: Chairman Lyons called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Administrative Assistant to the County Administrator Brandy Whitten conducted a roll call of the Board members. All Board members were present, with Supervisor McDaniel participating remotely. Supervisor Lewis offered an invocation for anyone who wished to participate. The Board then led in the Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Lyons advised of the following announcements: “While the room will be open to the public, due to the size of the meeting room and social distancing requirements, no more than 30 attendees will be allowed into the room at one time. Per the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia Executive Order 63, all persons over the age of ten, that do not have a precluding medical condition, are asked to wear a face covering. We will hold citizen comment near the beginning of the meeting. Also, there are several public hearings this evening. We will do our best to take citizen comment remotely. There are two options for citizens to offer comment remotely: 1) To join the Rockbridge County Board of Supervisor’s Zoom webinar The link is available on the County website to copy into the address line on your browser.
    [Show full text]