Diversity and Floristics of Monocots
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales -
Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese -
Reconstructing the Basal Angiosperm Phylogeny: Evaluating Information Content of Mitochondrial Genes
55 (4) • November 2006: 837–856 Qiu & al. • Basal angiosperm phylogeny Reconstructing the basal angiosperm phylogeny: evaluating information content of mitochondrial genes Yin-Long Qiu1, Libo Li, Tory A. Hendry, Ruiqi Li, David W. Taylor, Michael J. Issa, Alexander J. Ronen, Mona L. Vekaria & Adam M. White 1Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, The University Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, U.S.A. [email protected] (author for correspondence). Three mitochondrial (atp1, matR, nad5), four chloroplast (atpB, matK, rbcL, rpoC2), and one nuclear (18S) genes from 162 seed plants, representing all major lineages of gymnosperms and angiosperms, were analyzed together in a supermatrix or in various partitions using likelihood and parsimony methods. The results show that Amborella + Nymphaeales together constitute the first diverging lineage of angiosperms, and that the topology of Amborella alone being sister to all other angiosperms likely represents a local long branch attrac- tion artifact. The monophyly of magnoliids, as well as sister relationships between Magnoliales and Laurales, and between Canellales and Piperales, are all strongly supported. The sister relationship to eudicots of Ceratophyllum is not strongly supported by this study; instead a placement of the genus with Chloranthaceae receives moderate support in the mitochondrial gene analyses. Relationships among magnoliids, monocots, and eudicots remain unresolved. Direct comparisons of analytic results from several data partitions with or without RNA editing sites show that in multigene analyses, RNA editing has no effect on well supported rela- tionships, but minor effect on weakly supported ones. Finally, comparisons of results from separate analyses of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes demonstrate that mitochondrial genes, with overall slower rates of sub- stitution than chloroplast genes, are informative phylogenetic markers, and are particularly suitable for resolv- ing deep relationships. -
ABSTRACTS 117 Systematics Section, BSA / ASPT / IOPB
Systematics Section, BSA / ASPT / IOPB 466 HARDY, CHRISTOPHER R.1,2*, JERROLD I DAVIS1, breeding system. This effectively reproductively isolates the species. ROBERT B. FADEN3, AND DENNIS W. STEVENSON1,2 Previous studies have provided extensive genetic, phylogenetic and 1Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; 2New York natural selection data which allow for a rare opportunity to now Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458; 3Dept. of Botany, National study and interpret ontogenetic changes as sources of evolutionary Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, novelties in floral form. Three populations of M. cardinalis and four DC 20560 populations of M. lewisii (representing both described races) were studied from initiation of floral apex to anthesis using SEM and light Phylogenetics of Cochliostema, Geogenanthus, and microscopy. Allometric analyses were conducted on data derived an undescribed genus (Commelinaceae) using from floral organs. Sympatric populations of the species from morphology and DNA sequence data from 26S, 5S- Yosemite National Park were compared. Calyces of M. lewisii initi- NTS, rbcL, and trnL-F loci ate later than those of M. cardinalis relative to the inner whorls, and sepals are taller and more acute. Relative times of initiation of phylogenetic study was conducted on a group of three small petals, sepals and pistil are similar in both species. Petal shapes dif- genera of neotropical Commelinaceae that exhibit a variety fer between species throughout development. Corolla aperture of unusual floral morphologies and habits. Morphological A shape becomes dorso-ventrally narrow during development of M. characters and DNA sequence data from plastid (rbcL, trnL-F) and lewisii, and laterally narrow in M. -
Genome-Wide Identification of the YABBY Gene Family in Seven
plants Article Genome-Wide Identification of the YABBY Gene Family in Seven Species of Magnoliids and Expression Analysis in Litsea Xuedie Liu 1,2, Xing-Yu Liao 1,2, Yu Zheng 1,2, Meng-Jia Zhu 1,2, Xia Yu 2, Yu-Ting Jiang 1,2, Di-Yang Zhang 2, Liang Ma 2, Xin-Yu Xu 2, Zhong-Jian Liu 2 and Siren Lan 1,2,* 1 College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (X.-Y.L.); [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (M.-J.Z.); [email protected] (Y.-T.J.) 2 Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Orchid Conservation and Utilization at Colleage of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; [email protected] (X.Y.); [email protected] (D.-Y.Z.); [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (X.-Y.X.); [email protected] (Z.-J.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The YABBY gene family, specific to seed plants, encodes a class of transcription factors in the lamina maintenance and development of lateral organs. Magnoliids are sisters to the clade-containing eudicots and monocots, which have rapidly diversified among the common ancestors of these three lineages. However, prior to this study, information on the function of the YABBY genes in magnoliids was extremely limited to the third major clades and the early diverging lineage of Mesangiospermae. In this study, the sum of 55 YABBY genes including five genes in INO, six in CRC, eight in YAB2, 22 in YAB5, and 14 in FIL clade were identified from seven magnoliid plants. -
Evolving Ideas on the Origin and Evolution of Flowers: New Perspectives in the Genomic Era
HIGHLIGHTED ARTICLE | PERSPECTIVES Evolving Ideas on the Origin and Evolution of Flowers: New Perspectives in the Genomic Era Andre S. Chanderbali,*,† Brent A. Berger,‡ Dianella G. Howarth,‡ Pamela S. Soltis,*,§ and Douglas E. Soltis*,†,§,1 *Florida Museum of Natural History and †Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, ‡Department of Biological Sciences, St. John’s University, Queens, New York 11439, and §Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610 ABSTRACT The origin of the flower was a key innovation in the history of complex organisms, dramatically altering Earth’s biota. Advances in phylogenetics, developmental genetics, and genomics during the past 25 years have substantially advanced our under- standing of the evolution of flowers, yet crucial aspects of floral evolution remain, such as the series of genetic and morphological changes that gave rise to the first flowers; the factors enabling the origin of the pentamerous eudicot flower, which characterizes 70% of all extant angiosperm species; and the role of gene and genome duplications in facilitating floral innovations. A key early concept was the ABC model of floral organ specification, developed by Elliott Meyerowitz and Enrico Coen and based on two model systems, Arabidopsis thaliana and Antirrhinum majus. Yet it is now clear that these model systems are highly derived species, whose molecular genetic-developmental organization must be very different from that of ancestral, as well as early, angiosperms. In this article, we will discuss how new research approaches are illuminating the early events in floral evolution and the prospects for further progress. In particular, advancing the next generation of research in floral evolution will require the development of one or more functional model systems from among the basal angiosperms and basal eudicots. -
Magnoliophyta - Angiosperms Survey of Angiosperms — Using APG System
Magnoliophyta - Angiosperms Survey of Angiosperms — using APG system ‘Basal angiosperms’ • ANA (‘basal families’) • magnoliid complex • monocots Eudicots or tricolpates (3 pored pollen) • ranunculids • caryophyllids • rosids • asterids Basal Angiosperms We will begin our survey of angiosperms by examining the ‘basal angiosperms’ - those groups that are now shown to be the first diverging – paraphyletic! These include all those shown here except the eudicots which are the bulk of dicots We will look at the monocots - a ‘basal angiosperm group’ - at the end of the semester Basal Angiosperms What are basal angiosperms? (1) Charles Bessey’s order Ranales with most of the dicot basal angiosperms and (2) monocots Magnolia = primitive polypetaly hypogyny actinomorphic Basal Angiosperms What are basal angiosperms? Exhibit a suite of primitive character states 1. Many parts at each whorl Basal Angiosperms What are basal angiosperms? Exhibit a suite of primitive character states 1. Many parts at each whorl 2. Separate, unsealed carpels Drimys Winteraceae Basal Angiosperms What are basal angiosperms? Exhibit a suite of primitive character states 1. Many parts at each whorl 2. Separate, unsealed carpels 3. Follicle fruits Leaf-like follicles Basal Angiosperms What are basal angiosperms? Exhibit a suite of primitive character states 1. Many parts at each whorl 2. Separate, unsealed carpels 3. Follicle fruits 4. Laminar stamens Laminar stamens in yellow waterlily Basal Angiosperms What are basal angiosperms? Exhibit a suite of primitive character states 1. Many parts at each whorl 2. Separate, unsealed carpels 3. Follicle fruits 4. Laminar stamens 5. Tracheids, no vessel elements Basal Angiosperms What are basal angiosperms? Lilium (monocot) uniaperturate Exhibit a suite of primitive character states 1. -
Diversity and Floristics of Monocots!
Diversity and Floristics of Monocots! . aquatics, aroids, lilies . ! The Monocots! We will finish our survey of angiosperms by going back to the basal angiosperms and take a look at the monocotyledons - those possessing one seed leaf. The other main features of the monocots separating them from all other flowering plants are: 1. 3 merous flowers The Monocots! We will finish our survey of angiosperms by going back to the basal angiosperms and take a look at the monocotyledons - those possessing one seed leaf. The other main features of the monocots separating them from all other flowering plants are: 1. 3 merous flowers 2. Parallel-veined leaves The Monocots! We will finish our survey of angiosperms by going back to the basal angiosperms and take a look at the monocotyledons - those possessing one seed leaf. The other main features of the monocots separating them from all other flowering plants are: 1. 3 merous flowers 2. Parallel-veined leaves 3. Absence of woody tissue The Aquatic Monocots! emergent Emergent, floating, or submerged aquatic group of monocots These are the first diverging monocots submerged floating The Aquatic Monocots! Associated with the aquatic habit is the trend from insect-pollinated, showy flowers to water-pollinated, reduced flowers The group shows increasing effort to vegetative reproduction over sexual reproduction Showy flowers, insect-pollinated Reduced unisexual flowers, water-pollinated Butomaceae - flowering rush family! Emergent aquatic family Leaves show no obvious blade and petiole differentiation CA 3 CO 3 A 9 G 6 Flowers -
584 *Monocots, Basal Angiosperms, Chloranthales, Magnoliids
584 584 584 *Monocots, basal angiosperms, Chloranthales, magnoliids Subdivisions are added for monocots, basal angiosperms, Chloranthales, magnoliids together; for monocots alone See Manual at 583–585 vs. 600; also at 583–584 .2 *Basal angiosperms, Chloranthales, magnoliids Standard subdivisions are added for basal angiosperms, Chloranthales, magnoliids together; for basal angiosperms alone .22 *Amborellales Class here Amborellaceae .23 *Nymphaeales Including Cabombaceae, Hydatellaceae, Nymphaeaceae Including water lilies .24 *Austrobaileyales Including Austrobaileyaceae, Schisandraceae, Trimeniaceae Including magnolia vine, star anise .26 *Chloranthales Class here Chloranthaceae .28 *Magnoliids .282 *Canellales Including Canellaceae, Winteraceae Including wild cinnamon, winter’s barks .284 *Piperales Including Aristolochiaceae, Hydnoraceae, Saururaceae Including birthwort, black pepper, lizard’s-tails, peperomias Class here Piperaceae Class here peppers Class comprehensive works on peppers in 583.9593 .286 *Magnoliales Including Annonaceae, Magnoliaceae, Myristicaceae Including cherimoya, cucumber tree, custard apples, lancewoods, mace, magnolias, michelias, nutmegs, papaws, tulip tree, yellow poplar See also 583.78 for papaws of family Caricaceae * *Add as instructed under 583–588 1 584 Dewey Decimal Classification 584 .288 *Laurales Including Atherospermataceae, Calycanthaceae, Hernandiaceae, Monimiaceae, Siparunaceae Including avocados, bay laurel, California laurel, cinnamon, Oregon myrtle, sassafras, sweet bay; comprehensive works -
Ancestral Traits and Specializations in the Flowers of the Basal Grade of Living Angiosperms
Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 Ancestral traits and specializations in the flowers of the basal grade of living angiosperms Endress, Peter K ; Doyle, James A DOI: https://doi.org/10.12705/646.1 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-119333 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Endress, Peter K; Doyle, James A (2015). Ancestral traits and specializations in the flowers of the basal grade of living angiosperms. Taxon, 64(6):1093-1116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12705/646.1 TAXON 64 (6) • December 2015: 1093–1116 Endress & Doyle • Flowers of basal living angiosperms REVIEW Ancestral traits and specializations in the flowers of the basal grade of living angiosperms Peter K. Endress1 & James A. Doyle2 1 Department of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland 2 Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Peter K. Endress, [email protected] ORCID: PKE, http://orcid.org/000166228196; JAD, http://orcid.org/000240838786 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12705/646.1 Abstract New morphological and phylogenetic data prompt us to present an updated review of floral morphology and its evolution in the basal ANITA grade of living angiosperms, Chloranthaceae, and Ceratophyllum. Floral phyllotaxis is complex whorled in Nymphaeales and spiral in Amborella and Austrobaileyales. It is unresolved whether phyllotaxis was ancestrally whorled or spiral, but if it was whorled, the whorls were trimerous. -
Phylogenetic Analysis of 83 Plastid Genes Further Resolves the Early Diversification of Eudicots
Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots Michael J. Moorea,1, Pamela S. Soltisb, Charles D. Bellc, J. Gordon Burleighd, and Douglas E. Soltisd aBiology Department, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074; bFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148; and dDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 Edited* by Michael J. Donoghue, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved January 26, 2010 (received for review July 14, 2009) Although Pentapetalae (comprising all core eudicots except Gun- (BS) values regardless of the partitioning strategy (Fig. 1 and Figs. nerales) include ≈70% of all angiosperms, the origin of and rela- S1–S3). The ML topologies were also similar to the maximum tionships among the major lineages of this clade have remained parsimony (MP) topology (Fig. S4). Relationships among early- largely unresolved. Phylogenetic analyses of 83 protein-coding diverging angiosperms and among many clades of Mesangio- and rRNA genes from the plastid genome for 86 species of seed spermae agree with those from the largest previous plastid genome plants, including new sequences from 25 eudicots, indicate that analyses (12, 15). Below, we focus on results regarding relation- soon after its origin, Pentapetalae diverged into three clades: (i) ships within the eudicots, with an emphasis on the ML topologies. a “superrosid” clade consisting of Rosidae, Vitaceae, and Saxifra- Within Eudicotyledoneae, a basal grade emerged, with most gales; (ii)a“superasterid” clade consisting of Berberidopsidales, nodes receiving 100% ML BS support. In all ML analyses, Santalales, Caryophyllales, and Asteridae; and (iii) Dilleniaceae. -
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) System
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) system The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, or APG, refers to an informal international group of systematic botanists who came together to try to establish a consensus view of the taxonomy of flowering plants (angiosperms) that would reflect new knowledge about their relationships based upon phylogenetic studies. As of 2010, three incremental versions of a classification system have resulted from this collaboration (published in 1998, 2003 and 2009). An important motivation for the group was what they viewed as deficiencies in prior angiosperm classifications, which were not based on monophyletic groups (i.e. groups consisting of all the descendants of a common ancestor). APG publications are increasingly influential, with a number of major herbaria changing the arrangement of their collections to match the latest APG system. Angiosperm classification and the APG Until detailed genetic evidence became available, the classification of flowering plants (also known as angiosperms, Angiospermae , Anthophyta or Magnoliophyta ) was based on their morphology (particularly that of the flower) and their biochemistry (what kinds of chemical compound they contained or produced). Classification systems were typically produced by an individual botanist or by a small group. The result was a large number of such systems (see List of systems of plant taxonomy). Different systems and their updates tended to be favoured in different countries; e.g. the Engler system in continental Europe; the Bentham & Hooker system in Britain (particularly influential because it was used by Kew); the Takhtajan system in the former Soviet Union and countries within its sphere of influence; and the Cronquist system in the United States.