Document of The World Bank

FOR uFFICIAL USE ONLY

Public Disclosure Authorized ReportNo. 7948

PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Public Disclosure Authorized

RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT (CREDIT 790-PH)

JUNE 30, 1989 Public Disclosure Authorized

Adra-hure Operations Division CouintryDepartment II Public Disclosure Authorized Asia Regional Office

This document has a restricted distribution and mat be used by recipients only in the performance of their official luties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorizstion. CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS Currency unit - Philippines Peso (O) P 1 - US$0.135 US$1 - 1 7.40

WEIGHTSAND MEASURES

1 ha - 2.47 acres 1 km - 0.62 miles 1 sq km - 0.386 sq mile 1 m - 3.28 ft 1 sq m = 10.76 sq ft 1 cu m - 35.31 cu ft 1 M cu m 3 810.7 ac ft 1 mm 00.039 in 1 kg - 2.2 lb 1 cavan = 50 kg 20 cavans = 1 m ton

ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AID - Agency for International Development BAE - Bureau of Agricultural Extension BBR - Bureau of Roads BHS - Barangay health Station BPI - Bureau of Plant Industry BPW - Bureau of Public Works CCC - Cabinet Coordinating Committee on Rural Development CP - Cooperative Program CPO - Central Project Organization DAR - Department of Agrarian Reforms DLGCD - Department of Local Government and Community Development DOH - Department of Health DPH - Departmont of Public Highways DPWTC - Department of Public Works, Transportation and Communications FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FSDC - Farm Systems Development Corporation ISA - Irrigation Service Association MLWL - Mean Low Water Level NEDA - National Economic and Development Authority NFAC - National Food and Agricultural Council NGA - National Grain Authority NIA - National Irrigation Administration O&M - Operation and Maintenance PDAP - Provincial Development Assistance Program PDD - Project Development Department PMS - Proj ect Management Staff PPA - Philippines Port Authority PPDS - Project Planning and Development Service PRIP: I - Philippines Rural Infrastructure Project: I RB - Rural Banks RHU - Rural Health Unit UPRP - Upper River Project WHO - World Health Organization

GLOSSARY Barangay - Village

GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINES FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 THEWOPLD BANK Wash.ngton.D.C. 20433 U.S.A.

0ke dowf tm.GmCi

June 30, 1989

MHDORANDWMTO THE EMECUTIVE DIRECTORS AND THE PRESIDENT

SUBJECT: Project Completion Report on Philippines Rural Infrastructure Proiect (Credit 790-PH)

Attached, for information, is a copy of a report entitled "Project Completion Report on Pnilippines - Rural Infrastructure Project (Credit 790-PH)" prepared by the Asia Regional Office. No audit of this project has been made by the Operations Evaluation Department at this time.

Attachment

This documenthas a restricteddistribution and may be usedby recipientsonly in the performance of their ofmicialduties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosedwithout World Bank authorization. FOR OFFICIALUSE ONLY

PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

PHILIPPINES

RURAL INFRASTRUCTUREPROJECT (CREDIT 790-PH)

Table of Contents

Preface ...... i Basic Data Sheet. ii Evaluation Suammry ...... iv

OVERVIEWOF THE PROJECT COMPLETIONREPORT

General. 1 The Project. 2 Project Cost and Financing. 2 Implementation. 3 Project Impact. 5 Bank Performance. 8 Lessons Learned. 8

BORROWER'S PROJECT COMPLETIONREPORT

NMAPS.11

I. BACKGROUND.49

II. PROJECT FORMULATIONAND APPRAISAL.50

III. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION.52

IV. PROJECT COST AND DISBURSEMENT.61

V. INSTITUTIONALPERFORMANCE .63

VI. ECONOMIC REEVALUATION.66

VII. BANK'S PERFORMANCE.73

VIII. CONCLUSIONS.75

ANNEXES

MAP: IBRD 13274

This document hasa restricteddistribution and may be usedby recipientsonly in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwisebe disclosedwithout World Bank authorization. PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

PHILIPPINES

RUkAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT (CREDIT 790-PH)

PREFACE

This is a Project Completion Repo-t (PCR) on the Rural Infra- structure Project-I, for which an IDA credit in the amount of US$28.0 million to the government was approved on April 21, 1978. The credit was closed after two extensions totalling 2-1/2 years on June 30, 1986. The undisbursed balance of US$6.5 million was cancelled.

The Project Completion Report (PCR) was prepared by the Department of Public Works and Highways of the Government and an Overview of the PCR was prepared by the Agriculture Operations Division, Country Department II, of the Asia Regional Office. The PCR Overview is based on a review of the Staff Appraisal and the President's Reports, the credit documents, other records on Bank files, and on discussions with Bank staff.

This PCR was read by the Operations Evaluation Department (OED). The draft PCR was sent to the Borrower on May 31, 1989, for comments by June 20, 1989, but none were received. - ii -

POJECT COWLETIOlrREOT

RURALDPA3ThUCTURE PROJECT I (CREDIT790-PFi

BASICDATA S1EET

KEYPRMJECT DATA

Appraisal Actual or Actual as X of Exectation Current Estimate Asereieal Estimate

Projoect Coat (US$ million) 59.9 48.8 61.9 Credit Amount (USN million)/I 29.6 21.6 77.0 Dot. Board Approval 64/11/7S Date EffectIven ee *7/2x/79 Date Physical Components Completed 12/41/92 so/w/Uo 196.6 Closing Date 12/31/65U6/9/S6 165.6 Economic Rote of Return (3) /b 17 17 1 Financial Rate of Roturn (X) n.s. n.e.

CUMULATVEDISURSEMENTS

FY79 FYUO FYS1 FY62 FY65 FY34 FY3S FYIS

Appraisal Estimat (USS million) 6.2 6.5 14.0 21.6 26.6 29.9 23.6 269. Actual (US million) - *.6 2.6 7.2 10.2 14.8 17.6 21.5 Actual as I of Entima-e - 14.6 17.9 54.5 69.2 61.1 Data of Final Disburament 67/16/SO Principal Repaid to 12/15/67 (USS million) O."I

STAFF INPUTS (staff weeks)

FY76 FY76 FY77 FY73 FY79 FYU9 FY61 FY62 FY65 FY64 FY6S FYSO FY67 FYS9 TOTAL

Preappraisal 11.6 .0 22.0 6.6 42.1 Appraisal 37.9 63.9 91.7 Negotiations 7.2 7.2 Supervision 1.6 18.7 26.4 9.2 9.6 6.5 11.9 6.7 6.9 O.69 .1 99.1 Other t.1 0.2 2.2 0.2 2.7

Subtotal 11.7 .0 59.9 73.5 16.6 26.4 9.2 9.6 6.J 11.6 6.7 6.9 0.0 1.1 242.7 MISSION"DATA

Date Ne. of Staff/Day* Speei.lizatio. Permeme. Typs of (selvr) Porsons In field nrog *Otit Trl is Prabhw 1!

Identifioation 11/75 4 in2 A,Ee,Em(2) - - - Prepratien 06/76 5 1 A,E,,E*(&) - - - Appraisal11/77 7 lu A(2),Ec(2),En(8) - - - Appraisal2 11/77 b 1t Ec.En(4) - - - Subtotal 21 470

Supervision1 17/7? 2 12 En(2) 1 2 - Supervlsion2 9a/79 a so En(t) 1 1 - Supervisiona 19/79 2 St Eni) 1 2 N Superv;sionJ(o)* 'J/9 1 14 En 1 1 - Supervision4 " /66 4 24 A,En(3) 2 2 N Supervision4(c)o 10/6 1 En - - - Supervision5 68/61 2 14 En(2) 2 1 i Supervision5(a)e 56/61 1 a En - - - Supervision6 08/82 1 7 En 2 1 UT Supervision7 *J/J8 2 26 En,Ec 2 a UTF Supervision3 16/83 2 6 En(2) 2 1 MTFP Supervision9 638/4 1 7 En 2 1 bTFP Supervision1 11/64 1 1i En 2 1 MFG Supervision11 16/"U 1 16 En 2 - - Subtotal 24 2eo

Total 46 670

3 Not full ission--SPNof one componentonly.

OTHERPROJECT DATA

Borrowor Republicof the Philippinos Executing Agency Departmnt of Public Works and Highways(OPEl) National Irrigation Administration (NIA); and Department of Health (DON)

Fiscal Year jnanuary 1 - D e _ r *1 Cofinanciors None Nome of Currency (abbroviation) Peso (P) Currency Exchange Rate Appraisal Year Average 1978 USU110 * 7.37 Intervening Years Average 1962 USS11 * 8.37 Completion Year Ave-age 196 USSIl. u 2 .60

Follow-on Project: None

la The undisbursedcredit balanceof US86,481,600.6J was cancelled *ffective July 11, 1906. lb The weightedERR on the basisof relativecosts of the irrigation,roads and posts componentsof the ML project. benofitsfrom the healthand eater supplycomponents wero not quant;iled et appraisaland completion. /e A a agriculturIst;Ec z eonomiat;En a engineer. I1d a problem-freeor minor problemo;2 a moderateproblems; and * a major problems. L 1 * improvIng; 2 a stationary;8 a deteriorating. f F a financial;M a sanagorial;T a technical; P a political;and 0 a other. i-iv -

PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

PHILIPPINES

RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT (CREDIT 790-PH)

EVALUATION SUMMARY

Objectives

1. The Philippine Rural Infrastructure Project-I was an effort by the Government of the Philippines to raise the socio-economic conditions of the rural population in six provinces by providing relatively small-scale infra- structure works. The project aimed to establish: (a) communal irrigation systems; (b) barangay (village) roads; (c) small ports; (d) barangay health stations; and (e) rural water supply facilities.

Implementation

2. IDA Credit 790-PH for US$28 million became effective on July 20, 1978. This represented the entire foreign exchange component of the project, or 48 percent of the total cost of US$59 million. At appraisal, disburse- ments were expected to be completed by December 31, 1983, one year after the scheduled completion of all project works. However, the implemenLaLion of the project took about four years longer than predicted at the time of ap- praisal. Delays were caused by severe weather conditions, lengthy adminis- trative procedures, peace-and-order problems, shortages of materials, con- tract modificati ns necessitated by price increases, funding delays and contractor difficulties.

3. Difficulties that arose in the renegotiation of the fees of consultants involved in the detailed engineering phase of the barangay roads project delayed construction bidding for almost two years. Some of the sites proposed for roads or irrigation systems were found tc have low expected economic returns or to present technical difficulties, so they were abandoned in favor of more favorable locations. Ports also suffered delays mainly due to the inability of the contractors to finish the work because of rising costs and technical difficulties. The health station and rural water supply components experienced some slippages, but were generally completed on time. Due to lower than expected costs, the number of water systems constructed under the rural water supply component increased to 477 from the appraisal proposal of 300. Overall management and coordination of work among the different agencies responsible for the different components was also more complicated than anticipated at appraisal.

Results

4. By the end of tho extended project period, about 90% of project targets had been met. A total of 1,012 km of barangay roads were constructed or upgrad- ed, including 110 km of access roads to communal irrigation systems and health stations. This represented about 73% of appraisal. Post-project economic v

analysis shows an increase of land put undtr cultivationand an increase in the value of productiondue to the roads. With the completionof the irrigationcomponent, 43 communal irrigationfacilities were constructedor improved. The area provided with irrigationfacilities increased from the appraisal estimate of 9,400 ha to 9,589 ha. The PCR assumes somewhat higher yields and zropping intensitiesthan those used at appraisal. These values are not unrealisticfor small communal systems,where intense farming efforts are exercised. As planned, 60 health stations were completee serving about 213,800 patients in 1985. The main beneficiarieswere the estimated 132,500 poorer families in the area. Constructionon two of the three ports targeted for rehabilitationhas been completed,while work continues on the third. Traffic at these ports has risenLsignificantly from 1975 to 1985; in San Jose de Buenavista, from 15,000 tons to 26,000 tons; in Dumaguit, from a negligible amount to 10,000 tons; in Culasi, from 100,000 tons to 125,000 tons.

5. The project ERR varies among the different components,but overall the returns are quite good. Based on the post-projecteconomic analysis, 11 of the 13 test barangay roads showed returns between 11.82 and 23.8:, compared to the appraisal projectionof 15Z. Based on an analysis of eight sample irrigation systems, the project ERR is about 30Z, com,ared to the appraisal projection of 212. Ports also show a positive ERR, with returns at 182 at San Jose de Buenavista, 23Z at Dumaguit and 342 at Culasi, compared to the average of 25Z anticipated at appraisal. The ERR was not calculated for the rural health station or water supply component,-,but the relatively low costs, at US$4 per family for health care and US$26 per person for water supply, are judged to be justifiable when compared with the observed benefits.

Disbursements and Costs

6. The Credit Ciosing Date was extended by two and a half years from December 31, 1983 to June 30, 1986, to enable completion of the balance of the project, especially road construction. US$21.5 million of the US$28 million had been utilized by the expiry of the credit.

7. The final project cost in US dollar terms was US$48.3 million, some US$ll million (18Z) lower than the appraisal cost estimates of US$59 million. The final project cost in local currency equivalent was considerably higher (42Z) than the appraisalestimate (P 436.6 million at appraisalcf. P 618.5 million final cost).

Sustainability

8. The project design concentrated mainly on implementation aspects and made only passing references, largely through legal covenants, to maintenance of the facilities after construction. At the time of appraisal maintenance problems were well known to the Bank and were raised as issues during processing. Poor or inadequate mainternanceis a problem affecting the sustainability of these infrastructure investments. In particular, there has been little maintenance of any of the rural roads financed under the project (the largest component) and none have been transferred to a maintenance basis. These problems have a national perspective, however, reflecting overall resource constraints and policies, such that project- specific maintenance deficiencies are difficult to resolve. - vi -

Lessons Learned -

9. In forecating the implementation schedule, the appraisalmission could have taken a more realistic view of some of the factorswhich could hinder implementation, including: speed and efficiency of goverrnent procedures;likelihood or frequent difficultweather conditions;geographleal dispersion of project works; contractor availability and quality; possible peace and order problems; likelihoodof the need to modify enginoeringdesigns and works contracts; financial difficultieslikely to face the country.

10. The design and costing of specific works such as ports were not sufficientlyadvanced at appraisal,as seen by the difficultiesencountered in implementation. Although more flexibilitywas possible during implementation in respect to smaller, less complex infrastructure(e.g., rural roads, irrigation,water supply and health facilities),port constructionrequires careful preliminaryplanning and design. PHILIPPINES

RURALINFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT-I (CREDIT790-PH) PROJECT COMPLETIONREPORT

Overview

(General

1. Thii v'-,ervlew is based on the Project CompletionReport (PCR) of the PhilippineR-i: Tnr:rastructureProject-I (PRIP-I)prepared by the Department of Public Works arn1Highways (DPWH),the implementingagency of the Government of the Philip.f'i.z"-GOP), and on the Bank's Appraisal Report, President's Report, Credit Agreeuient,Bank supervisionmission reports and informacionin relevant Bank -'Ies. The PCR reflects the findings and opinions of Government officials closely .ssociatedwith the project and, in general, presents an objectiveview of project implementation,performance and impact.

The Project

2. Proiect jje cctives. PRIP-I was an effort by GOP to raise the socio- economic conditions of the rural population in six provinces,namely , -Apayda, , , and , which were selected on the 1,asisof their low k vel of per capita income and the need for rural infrastruct.ral tacilities. This multi-sectoral,integrated project was (ieSignedi primarl to provide relativelysmall-scale infrastructure works in these provinces. The project aimed to establish: (a) communal irrigation systems: { 'Paaiigay(village) roads; (c) small ports; (d) barangay health stat-ions: ei rural water supply facilities;and (f) proposals for a follow-up r rooe e t

i. Thel irterent components of the project were meant to be ';omrlemertary. isolated rural farmers having few marketing opportunities lacked the marerial incentivesand technicalsupport necessary to maximize crop yields. '.isth the construction of roads to ensure convenient access to market, ifrlgdi,r'rsystems to improve the yields, health stations and wells, the :iving staan.tardsof the target population were to be raised.

. ,aL^iv e>J,ads.This componentaimed to construct or upgrade 1,386 km of sir.guie 7ane, all-weatherroads, which would benefit some 78,000 families or 43v,0JO inhabitants, This would consist of about 150 road stretches Xaringllg an length f rom three to 17 km. Location of the roads was based on the crlteria ot'a ii;inimum of two villages and/or a populationof 100 inhabitants per km- t.' !r served, and a minimum economic rate of return of 10?.

'. >.eie;w-standard access roads would link relatively isolated .. e maInstream of economic life of the provinces. Before the , -:i.ages were accessible only by dirt tracks the majority of ihl 'e!- _r a condition, and often only by foot or animal-drawnsleds X.e: .e:e-~-~ !.- r'tiring the dry season. The dirt tracks were used by the -2-

farmers, their children and hired labor to transportpaddy and corn to the prwvincialroads and then to market. Some farmers due to the lack of time, money or labor, sold paddy to local middlemen for half the price ava,lable in nearby markets. 6. Cooinal IrritationSystems. The appraisal report ptoposed the constructionof 53 new irrigationsystems ranging in size from 50 ha to 1,100 ha, serving about 6,500 ha. and the rehabilitationof two systema serving about 900 ha. Approzimately7,000 farm families and 1,500 landless laborers' familieswould benefit. In the absence of the project, the rate of increase in rice yields was estimatedat about 0.5Z each year, due mainly to some marginal improvDemntsin applicationof inputs. With the project, the projected yield at full developmentwas expected to rise from 1.5 tons/ha to 2.5 to 3.0 tons/ha. The selectionof the areas was based on the criteria of a minimum cropping intensityof 130S, farm size of 1.0 to 1.5 ha or less for at least 70Z of the farms and a minimum economic rate of return of 102.

7. Ports. The project aimed to rehabilitateand expand the port facilities in one municipal and two national ports. Though relativelysmall in size, these ports are of major importanceto the poor rural inhabitantswho depend on them for inter-regionalcommunication. The appraisalreport estimated traffic in the ports would rise significantlyfrom 1975 to 198g. An increase in fishing activitiesalso increasedthe need for pogt renovation. Without rehabilitation,the degradationof the ports would cb6tinue. More goods would have to be transportedby truck to and from the port at , an average of 150 km away, increasingtransportation costs. Upgrading and rehabilitatingthe selected ports would reduce turnaroundtimes and handling costs of ships and cargoes, and encourage the introductionof larger and more efficientvessels in inter-islandtrade, The improvementworks included extensionor realignmentof breakwaters,installation of navigational aids, reclaimingand surfacingfor storage area ind provision of independentwater supply.

8. Health Stations. About 60 rural health stations located in villages appioximately5-10 km from a rural health unit were to be constructedunder the project. These stations would provide family planning and nutritional services as well as basic health care. Each stationwould be built on a publicly owned 300 sq m plot of land with a floor area of about 50 sq m. Since some of the stations in the provinceshad no access roads, these would be provided under the barangay road component.

9. Rural Water Supply. The proposed 300 wells would be drilled with drilling depths varying from six m to about 100 m dependingon the aquifer characteristics,and the wells equippedwith standard hand pumps. Easy access to the wells would be ensured, a concrete basin facility for washing clothes provided at each site. Wells would be at least 300 m apart, and villagers would be responsiblefor providing land for the well and maintaining the well after construction.

Proiect Cost and Financing

10. The total estimatedcost of the project was US$59 million. IDA Credit 790-PH for US$28 million was signed on April 21, 1978, representingthe -3- entire foreign exchange componentof the project. or 482 of the total cost. The remainingUS$31 million was to be provided by the Government. ImDlementation

11. The Credit was signed Dy the ExecutiveDirectors on April 21, 1978, and became effectiveon July 20. 1978. At appraisal,disbursements were expected to be completed by December 31, 1983. one year after the scheduled completionof all project works. However, project implementationtook about four years longer than predicted at appraisal. The main factors responsible for the delay include severe weather conditions,Government's lengthy administrativeprocedures, peace and order problems, funding delays and contractordifficulties. The barangay roads component suffered especially long delays, the first due to the renegotiationof consultantquotations for detailed engineeringbecause of the Bank's view that these quotationswere too high. Also shortagesof materials caused delays in the roads and ports components. Coordinationbetween the different implementingagencies was not as smooth as expected, and the diversity and geographic dispersionof the individualworks made overall management difficult.

12. The Credit was extended for two and a half years, to June 30, 1986. By the end of March 1986, overall project completionwas abo4t 90?. The irrigationsystem, water supply and health station componentswere 1001 complete. The barangay roads component suffered from peace add order and right-of-wayproblems, contractor difficulties,delayed fund releases and bad weather, and was only 73S complete by the end of the project. Two of the three ports were completed, the other only about 60? completed; delays were due to the lack of funds, redesign of the project and contract adjustment. The PCR has listed most of the causes of delays in project implementationwith which this Overview agrees. However, the PCR does not mention the delays caused by inadequate allocationof local funds for project implementationby GOP, due to severe financialconstraints.

13. Barangav Roads. A total of 1,012 km of roads were constructedor upgraded, against an apprais~altarget of 1,386 km, under this component. Barangay roads were divided into two groups, those to be constructedby the DPWH and ti.oseto be constructedby contractors. Out of a total number of 140 road sections, 66 sectionswith an aggregate length of 671 km were subject to contract bidding by prequalifiedcontractors. The original target date for bidding was set in September 1978 but due to high rates quoted by the local consultantsfor the detailed engineeringphase, the Bank suggested renegotiationof the bids on the detailed engineeringphase. This delayed the bidding on roads until mid-1980, delaying commencementof constructionby almost two years (see PCR paras. 3.02-3.08). Many contracts suffered delays. The most prevalent causes were: unavailabilityof equipment and materials and lack of working capital in the case of many contractors;delay by government in acquisitionof right-of-wayand relocationof utilities; poor organization and management among most contractors;time consuming governmentprocedures for processing interim payments, and contractmodifications. Other delays stemmed from the reorganizationof the Ministry of Public Works and Highways, severe weather conditions and sporadic peace and order problems. Among the total road projects under contract, 42? were completedon time while the rest experienceddelays ranging from less than a year to three years. About 10S of -4- the contract projects were either cancelledor rescindedand then completedby DPWH. Almost all of the road sections implementedby DPWH are reported to have been completedon time (see PCR paras. 3.02-3.08).

14. Communal Irrifation. The impiementationof this componentwas undertakenby the National IrrigationAdministration (NIA). Of the 51 new irrigationsystems planned at appraisal,22 were constructed. Since others were found to be uneconomicalor to present technicaldifficulties, 21 alternativesystems were rehabilitatedinstead. The total area developedis reported as 9,589 ha against an appraisaltarget of 9,400 ha. Some minor delays were caused by errors in design and constructionof four systems, right-of-wayproblems due to disagreementof some farmers to the constructior4 of on-farm facilities,and in some cases the lack of cooperationof Irrigator Association (IA) members. Farmer beneficiarieswere involved in the formulation,design and constructionof most of the 43 systems, and are responsiblefor their operationand maintenance (see PCR paras. 3.09-3.10). The constructionof the 43 communal sub-projectsstarted in July 1978 and was completedclose to Rcnedule,in December 1983. The constructedsystems had already been turned over to their respectiveIrrigation Associations when typhoons and strong floods hit the region in 1984 and 1985, causing some damage. The repair work was completed in May 1986.

15. BaranRay Health Stations. The Bureau of Public Works of the Departmentof Public Works, Transportationand Communication(DPWTC) was responsiblefor the design, constructionand supervisionof the health stations while the Project ManagementStaff of the Departmentof Health (DOH) was responsiblefor contract administrationand procurementof supplies and materials and operation. Constructionbegan in 1979, and the 60 stations became operationalin 1983. However the complete equipping and furnishingof these stationswas finished only in 1985, mainly due to a lack of coordination between the implementingagencies.

:6. Ports. The Bureau of Public Works of DPWTC was responsiblefor the design and constructionof ports, with contractorstaking on most of the actual constructionwork. Slippagesoccurred on all projects,mainly due to the inabilityof the contractorsto finish the work in time because of rising costs, technicaldifficulties and political cactors. The port at Culasi was 87S finished in 1982, when the contract was terminatedbecause the contractor was unable to finish the work. Another contractorfinished the job in 1983. The port of San Jose de Buenavistawas 99Z completewhen the newly constructed breakwaterwas damaged by a typhoon in 1982 and the contract terminatedin 1983. Other contractorscontinued the project, completingall work in April 1986. Work at the Dumaguit port (about 60t accomplished)has yet to be completed,due mainly to deficienciesin the origina. pile foundationdesign and contractualproblems which followed as a result,which Governmentfailed to resolve in time (see PCR paras. 3.14-3.17). Governmentwill complete this work using local funds.

17. Rural Water Supply. The Bureau of Public Works of DPWTC was responsiblefor the implementationof rural water supply systems. The drilling of wells was started on time. A total of 462 wells were initially drilled of these 25 wells were abandoneddue to problems such as salty or muddy water or shale formation. Noting the availabilityof more funds due to p. -~~~~~~~~~~~~5- lower than anticipatedunit costs, DPWTCcontinued to construct 40 more water supply systemswith Bank approval. Of the 477 serviceablewells constructed :bout 31 are not currentlyoperational because of poor maintenance (see PCR paras. 3.18-3.19).

18. PreDarationof Future Proiect. No work was performedon the component,due apparentlyto a decision between the Bank and Governmentnot to have a follow-up project of this type.

19. Disbursementsand Costs. Disbursementof Credit 790-PH lagged well behind appratsal estimates throughoutthe project implementationperiod. The Credit Closing Date was extended by two and a half years from December 31, 1983 to June 30, 1986, to permit completionof the remainingworks, especiallyroad construction. US$21.5 million (of a total of US$28 million) was utilized of by the close of the Credit and the balance was cancelled (see PCR paras. 4.04-4.06,Annex 4.07.1).

20. The final project cost in US dollar terms, was US$48.3 million, some US$11 million or 182 lower than the appraisal estimate of US$59 million, mainly due to the devaluationof Philippinecurrency. However, the final project cost in local currency equivalentis higher than the0appraisal estimate by about 42Z. from Pesos 436.6 million at appraisal to,Pesos 618.5 million final cost.

Proiect Impact

21. Overall. The major objectivesof the project were met by providing 1,012 km of all-weather road access to markets, health stations and irrigation systems for the rural population;irrigating 9,589 ha of farmland to increase the yield of rural agriculturalproduction; providing 60 rural health stations to promote health and serve the medical needs of the rural population; improvingthe rural water supply system by constructing477 rural water supply systems to provide safe and potable drinking water; finishingconstruction of two ports to promote transportationand shipping,with work continuingon a third. By the end of the project, about 90Z of the appraisal targets were completed.

22. Barangay Roads. A total of 1,012 km of barangay roads were constructedor upgraded through the project. Because of sparse populationor difficult terrain, some of the sites originallyproposed were found inappropriate. Roads with higher rates of expected economic returns and lower constructioncosts replaced those which were dropped.

23. The appraisalmission had analyzed 6 barangay road projects to evaluate the economic viability of this component. The post-project reassessmentstudy used the same methodologybut analyzed 13 sample roads, with some adjustmentsof prices and costs to the 1986 level (see PCR paras. 6.01-6.04). The appraisalmission determinedthat a satisfactoryERR would be 102; the post-projectevaluation calculates the ERR to be satisfactoryon 11 of the of 13 projects, ranging from 11.8Z to 23.8? (see PCR para. 6.05, Annexes 6.05.1 to 6.05.13). -6-

24. Greater access to markets, and substitutionof jeepneys and trishaws for animal and man-drawn sleds has probably been the greatest benefit of the new barangay roads. Agriculturalproduction has increasedfrom both the increase in crop yields (see PCR Annex Table 6.04.7) and the opening up of new areas to cultivation. The appraisalreport assumed that five years after completionof a road all identifiednew potential areas for future production, averagingabout 20 ha per km of road, would be under cultivation. According to the 1987 economic analysis of the six km Sevilla-Bilarroad section, total area under cultivationwould remain constant at 1985 levels without road construction,at 1,945 ha, but with the road this would increase to 2,143 ha by 1990, an increase of 198 ha or 102. On this sub-project,new land put under cultivation increased33 ha per km of road built, higher than the appraisalestimates. The economic analysis also predicts an increase in the value of production, from P 7,161,000in 199n without the roads to P 9,792,00i with the roads, an increase of 36?. All-weather roads are also expected to give inhabitantsgreater access to health and educationalfacilities. According to the appraisal report, children should be able to spend more time in school instead of transportingpaddy, villagers have better access to off- farm employmentduring the off-seasonmonths in nearby towns, and farmers can grow labor-intensive,higher value crops, but these points are not mentioned in the PCR.

25. Communal Irrigation. With the completionof the irrigation component,43 communal irrigationfacilities were constructedor improved. This included the constructionof 22 new irrigationsystems serving 5,274 ha and the rehabilitationof 21 existing systems serving 4,315 ha. Of these 43 implementedprojects, 28 were included in the appraisal listing and 15 systems were new inclusions. The appraisal report proposed the establishmentof about 53 new communal irrigation projects serving about 8,500 ha and the rehabilitationof 2 old systems serving 900 ha, a total of 9,400 ha, but due to various factors, including the low expected economic returns of some proposed systems, lack of water, steep slope and high constructioncosts, some of the originallyplanned systemswere not built. Despite the reductionin the number of projects implemented,the area provided with irrigation facilitiesincreased from the appraisalestimates of 9,400 ha to 9,589 ha.

26. At appraisal the overall ERR for this componentwas estimated at 21?. The feasibilityreport on which appraisalwas based presented ten representa- tive communal irrigationsystems as test projects that were subjectedto detailed feasibilitystudies. For purposes of comparison,the economic re- evaluationin the PCR has been limited to the studied systems and the procedure carried out as in the feasibilitystudies (see PCR paras. 6.06.10). The projects costs used in the post-projectanalysis were adjusted to 1986 levels for the evaluation. On this basis the ERR of the sampLe systems is higher than the feasibilitystudy estimates. The higher ERR is attributable to a larger service area, higher yields and cropping intensities,higher farmgate price and, in some cases, reduction in project costs. The ERRs range from 17.0Z to 47.2? (30? weighted average) in the PCR, higher than the feasibilitystudy estimates in all but two cases (see PCR paragraph 6.10), and higher than the appraisalestimate.

27. The average cropping intensityincreased from an estimated 164? to 174?, increasingthe total effective area from 15,400 ha to 16,705 ha (see PCR -7- paras. 3.22, 3.23, Annex 3.22.1). The average cost of constructionwas estimated as P 6,920 per ha, comparedwith P 8,800 per ha estimatedby the appraisal report (see PCR Annex 3.22.1). The operationand maintenancecost (o&0)was predicted to be US$10 per ha by the appraisal report,about the same as the P 200 estimated for 1986 in the PCR (see PCR Annex 6.09.1). Crop yields on irrigated land increased;for example, at the Madua-San Isidro Comnunal IrrigationSystem in Bohol, yields of rice in 1987 are an estimated 3.28 tons/ha for both the first and second planting. Without the project, yields would only be about 2.5 toils/hafor the first planting and 2.2 tons/ha for the second planting (see Economic Analysis tables, IrrigationComponent). Yields also increasedfor other crops. Projectedmaximum yield levels estimated by PCR are generallyhigh.er than those predicted by the appraisal report (see PCR Annex 6.04.8).

28. Health Stations. As planned, 60 health stationswere completedand made operational in 1983. Some of the units were constructedin new sites because of poor access to the proposed sites or low populationin the area (see PCR paras. 3.28-3.29). These clinics provide family planning and nutrition services as well as basic health services. PCR reports a total of 213,760 patients served in 1985 (see PCR Annexes 6.11.1). Although the influence of health care is difficult to quantify, PCR notes that in 1985 total crude deaths in the areas were 12,893, 18.6Z lower thon the 15,839 before the opening of the station in 1979. Infant mortality dropped 43.81. The drop in death rate and child mortality may have some correapondencewith the establishmentof the health care stations,but other factorsmay also be involved. The main beneficiariesof the health stations are the estimated 132,503 poorer families of the area. Total cost comes to about US$4 per family (see PCR paras. 6.11-6.13,Annex 6.11.1).

29. Ports. Two national ports end one municipal port were targeted for rehabilitationand improvement. The work on the ports of Culasi in Capiz and San Jose de Buenavista in Antique are completed. Due to a deficiency in the design of the concrete pile foundationsfor the wharf, resultingdesign changes and problems with contractors,the work on the Dumaguit in Aklan port (about 601 done) has not yet been completed (see PCR paras. 3.24-3.27). At appraisal, it was predicted that traffic at the three ports would rise significantlyfrom 1975 to 1985; in San Jose de Buena Vista, from 15,000 tons to 26,000 tons, in Dumaguit from a negligibleamount to 10,000 tons, and in Culasi from 100,000 tons to 125,000 tons. In the post-projectre-evaluation of the port project, the evaluationmethod used in the appraisal is adopted. This assumed that without improvementthese ports would have difficulty handling traffic and would not be able to handle traffic increasesunless facilitieswere rehabilitated. Despite the uncompletedstatus of the port of Dumaguit, it is still evaluatedbased on the assumptionthat the existing cargo and passenger traffic in Washington will be transferredto Dumaguit when it opens (see PCR para. 6.16). With rehabilitation,total cargo handled is slightly above the appraisal estimates (see PCR para. 6.15). Post-projectERR was slightly higher than the appraisalevaluation, at 18? at San Jose de Buenavista,231 at Dumaguit, and 341 at Culasi (see PCR para. 6.18, Annex 6.18.1) against appraisal projectionsof 15?, 21Z and 302 respectively.

30. Rural Water Supply. The 300 wells proposed at appraisalwere drilled at well under appraisal cost, due to the availabilityof equipmentand lower -8-

than expected drilling depths. Wells were constructedat the health care stations and other sites. A total of 477 wells were constructed. The rural water supply project has provided a safe and reliablewatcr supply for about 110,000 villagers. This should lead to a reductionin water-bornediseases and eliminationof the necessity of hauling water over long distances. These benefits have not been quantified.but are judged to justify the small per capita investmentof about US$26.

Bank Performance

31. The PCR notes that the project was in agreementwith the Government's efforts to raise the socio-economicconditions in the project area. The PCR comments that the implementationschedule prepared by the Bank's appraisal mission was overly optimisticand did not allow for lengthy administrative proceduresand delays due to difficultweather conditionsand security issues (see PCR para. 7.02). Although these factorsmay not have been fully appreciatedat appraisal,other delays, such as those due to the lack of local funding, were also major factors.

32. The PCR credits the Bank with making valuable suggestionsand recommendations,and with following-upproblems that could have further aggravatedimplementation delay if they were not resolved iptime. Among the assistancenoted was that given to the strengtheningand supp&rtof staff, procurementof equipment and advice on financialmatters includingthe extension of the Bank Credit (see PCR paragraph 7.03.)

33. Mention was also made of the 'negativeattitudes' of the Bank toward the bidding procedureson barangay roads, and the lack of understandingof some Bank members, particularlyduring the early stages of implementation. This, 'caused disenchantmentamong field officials and resulted in lukewarm cooperation'(see PCR paragraph 7.02).

Lessons Learned

34. The implementationschedule prepared by the Bank's appraisalappears to have been overly optimistic. Some factors, such as: speed and efficiency of Governmentprocedures; likelihood of frequent severe weather conditions; geographicalspread of project works; contractoravailability and quality; possible peace and order problems; likely funding difficulties;etc. are common to several projects and deserve a deeper appreciation.

35. The roads and ports projects suffered the longest delays, each containingsome sub-projectsthat needed redesigning. The redesign and relocationof some of the roads were unavoidabledue to the large area involved and variationsin terrain. Allowances for such changes appear inadequate,considering the overall environment. The necessity of redesigning the port facilitiesat Dumaguit, however, indicates inadequatepreparatory work by the time of project appraisal. Hiring dnd retaininggood contractors was difficult in both the roads and ports components,and projects were consequentlydelayed. This emphasizesthe importanceof thoroughlyreviewing all important construction designs for works of this nature and carefully evaluating contractor capability and availability.

36. Although rearly impossible,there is a need for measures to expedite and improve the efficiencyof novernmentprocedures. -9-

Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS

PHILIPPINE RURAL INFRASTRUCTUREPROJECT-I (IDA LOAN-790-PH)

PROJECTCOMPLETION REPORT

AUGUST, 1987

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE-PRIP-I, MAR-IBRD IN COORDINATIONWITH PROJECT MANAGEMENTOFFICE-FEASIBILITY STUDIES SdVWI

- TT - - 13 -

smn Juan ~15z,uin"bmgRoad

Alinaya - Br4h Road \ ,~~~~~~.._.j.-...._

Jet. Nat'l. \ \ .- _ j -/ >

K~s._ a

Villaviciosa-s Road. -J

-Nmbo D tamXR.oad: B-lm Roadr

. . .AR ~~~~~~BoLry- Kion-ula Rd

RPilippine Rral Infrastruture Project

ProviwA of AMA

.,,,M Baranpy Roads .~~~~~~~~~~~i- ......

- I I 4 9: ,jp OuS t ~~~~~~~~Solido -lasena Poad

iNlnisud - Btgttg bato .Taps Road

#anPande - Payakan Road

Regador - YawanRoad \ai' U#o

PIA ATvi o AL Tmacoe - Panayakdn P"W~~~rioes- Ltaan oa

La : BaauigayA'or ad Libalyg- B. Barrio Ru&ovlLI J l)foIA " WSITtl >1 { { .\ 9bw~ARG Brlones -Laan Rsoad

- C_Iig,an RPd Naulinao - Bulabod Road 7 6kA3\ Futgencio

t I II^~~~LiElt - Batete - Calem pa

pibacao Ortega Rod Pbes I % i * a7

I~~ A

Philippine Rurat Lnfrastnucture Project

?hp I Provinc-e of AKLAN

legetid: _..o B;ra:Cay Roads z orts - 16 -

itadton-Alegre Road

Culasi-Montero Road

anise-Flores Road Importante-Tuno Road

awaan-Maybunga Road

Bugasong-Pangagalkan .oad

rmTnoMoS -F~'~-ffi- - = X , ' Eatnongon-Cuyapisto Road

Sumaray-Bagumbayan Road

San Remegio-Maradiona Road

Bia-nan - Bad-as- Tordesillas Road alala-Apdo Road

Philippine Rural Infrastructure Project Map I Province of Antique Legend:

w~ Barangay Roads rts RRINE O AS CITY Bia-(tasi Bcad All

< A~~~~APIAN C

OAS .?CJZJ.*, PORT "^*S0oA ° /A S

0A . . \* dSS0 \ I }

BARANGAY~ ROADS~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LA Rd. \wi. T ixa Sur - Pa. gi_n

Tas BoxsRa

PHIL IPP INE RUJRALI"fRASTRUCTURE PROJECT PROVINCE OF CAPIZ2 mapI LiEGEND: -BAP."GY ROADS PORTS Dagohoy - %:fft 0 WCanoling ; o° Road

Caugnundo - Kauawagan Roe

Canoting - Calatrava Roa Ubay - Bayungan Road Bog tong-bud - Dagnawan Road

Ulbujan-Sar ldr~

4 g eabayan- Inaghuban

Antiquera - Lose \ '- at;gF \ 7 " sA )e r r teu^t2arra Bullones - 4ngelan Road -- Candelaria Road

tag-Nan-od Road Cantonimbo - Data8 Road , C H ; s t \ \ ) S hop *agdan-LundagRoad

2 i~~katuna - polan-CambuyoRoad 7) Sevilla Road la-Oac (Dumyao) Road evilla-BilarRoad

L....awPhilippinePBesrng *^""* Rural Infrastruct7ure Project Province of Bohol Legend: Barangay Roads - 19 -

COMMUNALIRRIGATION PROJECTS/SYSTEMS

1. Gawad- Lagayan- La Paz CIS Ext'n. 2. QuidaoenCIS 3. MalanasLeft CIS 4. AbangCIS 5. NaguilianCIS 6. PatocCIS ,- \

N/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~ '4: ......

'~~

-< .1/ eACCESSROAD TO IRRIGATION I'J PROJECTS/SYSTEMS .gme \ d! ,1. AccessRoad to Gawad- Labayan- LapazCIS Ext'n. x * \ .i . 2. AccessRoad to Guidaden- 'N\v J CabcaburaoCIS 3. Access Road to Malanas Left CIS 4. AccessRoad to AbangCIS ( ; 5. AccessRoad to Naguilian CIS 6. AccessRoad to NatocCIS

aI

PHILIPPINERURAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT PROVINCEOF ABRA

LEGEND: 0 PRIP-COMF4NALIRRIGATION PROJECTS/SYSTEMS *m ACCESS ROADS MAP II - 20 -

COMMUNALIRRIGATION PROJECT SYSTEMS * -. 1. ConsueloCIS 2. TumalunogCIS 3. MalubibitNorte CI 4. LagacCIS 5. BagombongCIS

6. CalafugCIS - * 7. NambucayanCIS 8. MalalaoCIS 9. CalaccadCIS --

ACCESSROAD TO IRRI- _ -GATIONPROJECTS/ / -. ; SYSTEMS ( -.- 1. AccessRoad to / ConsueloCIS -...- 2. AccessRoad to TumalunogCIS .. , 3. AccessRoad to MalubibitNorte CIS | . ' 4. AccessRoad to LagacCIS 5. AccessRoad to BagomTbongCIS* 6. AccessRoad to - - CalafugCIS 7. AccessRoad to _ NambucayanCIS - 8. AccessRoad to \ MalalaoCIS 'r 9. AccessRoad to i - CalaccadCIS -

PHILIPPINERURAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRO.JECTS PROVINCEOF KALINCA-

LEGEND:MAI 4w PRIP-CCH4UN4ALIRRIGATION PROJECTS/SYSTEM4S I o A ACCESSROADS COMMUNALIRRIGATION PROJECTS/SYSTE4S ATILLO Malay CIS *Buruanga- HabanaCISA Liloan- MalandayonCIS * Cabayugan- TantbuanCIS |AA)ON*Ew WASIIINTj__

CCESSROAD TO IRRIGATIONPROJECTSISYSTEMS AccessRoad to Malay CIS AccessRoad to Buruanga- Hab na CIS L ATA AccessRoad to LiloanMalanda n CIS LET AccessRoad to Cabayugan- T buanCIS )-. A

PHILIPPINERURAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT PROVINCEOF AKLAN MAP 11 LEGEND: Q PRIP-COMMUNALIRRIGATION PROJECTS/SYSTEMS _ ACCESSROADS - 22 -

'^ COMMUNALIRRIGATION PROJECTS/SYSTEMS 1. FraganteCIS 2. BitadtonCIS L:>; 3. SanJuan CIS ; 4 BugasongCIS 5. PandananCIS ' 6. IgbobonCIS 1t / 7. BugoCIS 8. HamticCIS 9. Dao CIS

ACCESSROAD TO IRRIGATIONPROJECTS/ SYSTEMS 1. FraganteCIP AccessRoad 2. BitadtonCIP AccessRoad ' 3. San Juan - TomaoCIP AccessRoad M9MA k4. BugasongCIP AccessRoad sot\X5. PandanaCIP AccessRoad \ 6. IgbobonCIP AccessRoad 7. BugoCIP AccessRoad \ 8. HamticCIP AcccessRoad o 2XX l 9. Dao CIP AccessRoad

CA.

Ws

DEO &S.MSTA

PHILIPPINERURAL :NFRASTRUC7URE PRCUECT PROVINCEOF ANTIQUE

LEGEND: *w PRIP-COM4NUNAL!RRIGAT:ON PROjEC'S/SYST~EKS MAP II COMMUNALIRRiGATION PROJECTS/SYSTEMS 1. Mianay CIS 2. Cala-AgusCIS 3. BalucuanCIS 4. Ilas CIS 5. Nagba CIS 1 CITY 6. SalcedoCIS NVT POEVEv A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OIA

1.Aces R adoNaa I .-- * y \ D(< tP RA

', / >~~~~~~~~~~~+'~~t t''-J~~ACCESS ROAD TO IRRIGArTIONPROJECTS/SYSTEMS 1. AccessRoad to MianayCIS 2. AccessRoad to Cala-AgusCIS PHILIPPINERURAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT 3. AccessRoad to BalucuanCIS 4. AccessRoad to lhasCIS PROVINcIOf CAPIZ 5. AccessRoad to NagbaCIS 6. AccessRoad to SalcedoCIS LEGEND: C PRIP-COMMUNALIRRIGATIOM/SYSTEMS _o.~. ACCESSROADS COMMUNALIRRIGATION PROJECTS/SYSTEMS c-" PRIPCIS's o Dt D 1. San Agustin CIP 2. San Isidro- BansalanCIP 3. IlihanCIP 4. BagasicoCIP 5. GabayanCIP 6. CadapdapanCIP 7. BugsocIntegrated CISIP 8. Madua -San Isidro IP

~~, ~, ' \ ~ ACCESSROAD TO IRRIGATION PROJECTS/SYSTEMS

_J/^wV 1. AccessRoad to SanAgustin CIP ;,* . \tl Kst St Roadto San Isidro - BansalanCIP TAFuucn! OTV :J 2. Access 3. AccessRoad to lilhanCIP 4. AccessRoad to BagasicoCIP U 5. Access Road to GabayanCIP 6. Access Roadto CadapdapanCIP 7. Access Road to Bugsoc Integrated CISIP 8. Access Road to Madua- San Isidro CIP

PHILIPPIIE RURALINFRASTRXTtJE PIWJECTS PROVINEOF BOBO D LEGEND: PRIP-COWUA IRIGATIONPROJECTV/SYTERS _asm m ACCERSS - 25 -

BARANGAYHEALTH STATIONS ! 1. ValascoBHS, Tayumi / * 2. AbasBHS, Sallapadan .3. DalitBHS, Pilar 4. BangbongoagBHS, Bucay 5.SanMarcial-San Nicolos BHS a~ CalotBHS, Bangued ~ ~ 67. San GregorioBHS, La Paz

PHILIPPINERUJRAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRO.JECTS Nap III PROVINCEOF ABRA

LEGEND: - 26 -

/^

BARANGAY HEALTH STATIONS - 1. Apatan BHS,Pinukpuk > '\.^ " 2. Butuan BHS, Conner' : .' /" 3. Liwan East BHS, :- _ -,'_r~ . _ > , 4. Buianao BHS, Trabuk - - ._ L- 1 5. Tuga BHS,Tabuk 8:_:t",.S~_...,^ 6. Managol BHS, Lubuagan *._-_J 7. Masimot BHS, Cabuagao % a a. Builuyan BHS/ < ..,.. 9. Sipa BHS, Sta. Marcela *. . _ \--- / 10. Sta. Felomena BHS, Calanasan _ 3l. Bacasay BHS, Luna | . ;. / 12. Batong-Buhay BHS, Pasil 3. KapanikianBHS, Pudtolonr 14. Botbot BHS, Tunglayan 15. Mangale BHS, Balbalan

16. Mabaca BHS, Balbalan - - * \

ACCESS ROAD TO ARANCAY HEALTH STATION| 1. Access Road to Flora Health Station 2. Access Road to Luna Health Staion 3. Access Road to Calanasan Health Station 14.Botbot S u_._--

PROVINCE OF KALINbA-APAYAO Map III

LEGEND:

ACS RBARAN HEALTHGAY STATION 2. Ac ACCESS ROADS B[UFIUAlq()-

\) ** J4JE~ Z, KL\

\, CAETILNLOAW 1ICA- @ AIAT

!4ALINA0 A 0 " NEW WASIIIIEOTIJr

t } / UAWA* gh~~~LET\v ~~~~ALrAV

BARANGAYHEAL.H STATIONS !% /Ieu HL_> 1. Julita BHS, Libacao 2. NaisudOHS, lbajay 3. Argao BHS, fl1ay 4. Panayakan BNS, Tangalan 5. Malon BHS, Altavas PHILIPPINE RURAL INFRASTRUCTUREPROJECT {:-- ~~~~~~~6.Arcangel BHS, Balete 7. Alaminos BHS, Mbdalaz PROVINCEOF AKLAN 8. Torralba BHS, Banga

Map III LEGEND: PARANGAY HEALTH STATION - 28 -

I. /

I9r . '

WPam"~~~am

~~~m ~~BARANGAY HEALTHSTATIONS 1. BitadtionBHS, Culasi S cE 2. CapayuanBHS, Barbaza HAM m a'3. TinigbocBHS, Caluya 4. UnionBHS, Libertad 5. TagudtodBHS, Bugasong 6. Guimrbang-anBHS, San Jose 7. IgburiBHS, Patnongon 8. San JuanBHS, Sibaton 9. GallanBHS, Sabaste 10. FraganteBHS, Pandan

PM4ILIPPrNERURAL INFRtASTRUCTUREPROJECTS Ma~pIII PROVINCE OF ANTIQUE

LEGEQD: .! BARANGAY HEALTH4STATION STA'IOtlS C A NA<) jJaAPA.B,, B>I;ARANGAY HEALTH Sab clago IIXIIAtlL^'cT^rlNtl~AflA ,.r«l Ti \ 2~~~~~~~~1 _S t___J_t_/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~6.Maindang -A. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~7.CasanayanBH4S, Pilar 8.BadiannanBHS. Pres. Roxas 9. JagnayaBHS, Jamindan 1.SleoBS uaa PHILIPPINERURAL INfRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PROVINCEOF CAPIZ Ia

LEGEND: 0

od- .It tW C

owo 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BARANGAYHEALTH W ATIONS

Dusita //TAGOfLA;;nea 4.3. ttCatagdaan T^-K A U^2U" _ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5.Tambungan 6. La HaciendaBHS. Alicia 7. NandaweBHS, Tilibon

-'

PHILIPPINERURA INFRASTRUCTUREPROJECTS Map II PROVINCEOf BOHOL LEGEND: MAANGAYHEALTH STATION1 - 31 -

tm 9

PHILIPPINE RURALINFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT MapIV PROVINCEOF ABRA

* RURALWATER SUPPLY

0 - 32 -

LIST OF COMPLETEDPRIP-I RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROVINCEOF ABRA

BANGUED 26. Cayapa 1. Consolado 27. Bio 2. Caladia 3. Sao-atan LAGAYAN 4. Sinalang 28. Pang-ot 5. Macay 29. Pulot 30. Dugyuan BOLINEY 31. Duot 6. Danec LANGIDEN BUCAY 32. Baac 7. Calao 8. South LA PAZ 9. Malita 33. Ben-ben 10. Bakilino 11. Salnec MANABO 12. Quimlaong 34. Sto. Tomas 13. Bangbongcag 35. Catacdagan 14. Cabaraon 15. Lahon PERARUBIA 16. Bugbog 36. Malansit 37. Sta. Rosa DANGLAS 17. Danglas P.DIGAN 38. Naguirayan DOLORES 39. Sulvec 18. Cabaroan 40. Yayang 19. Cardona 41. Arab 20. Tapang 21. Nagsangalan PILAR 22. Poblacion 42. Tiquitic LAGANGILAN 43. Turod 23. Aguet 44. San Juan East 24. Taping 45. San Juan West 25. Bacooc - 33 -

PROVINCEOF ABRA

SALLAPADAN 46. Naguillan

SAN JUAN 47. Culiong 48. Guimba 49. Subtan-olo 50. Lan-ag 51. Cabcaburao 52. Supi-il

SAN ISIDRO 53. Dalinrag 54. San Marcial 55. Langbaban 56. Cabayagan

TAYUM 57. Palpal 58. Tecker 59. Pias - 34 -

'N'

/

1 .t .--

PMILIPPiNERURAL. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I Map IV PROVINCEOF KALINGA-APAYAO

S RURL WATERSUPPLY - 35 -

LIST OF COMPLETEDPRIP-I RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROVINCEOF KALINGA-APAYAO

BALBALAN PUOTOL

1. MabacaBPS - 22. Alem 23. Poblacion BULANAO 24. PudtolC/s site-/ 2. 2 25. San Antorio 3. Purok3 26. Malibang 4. Purok4 27. Agora 5. Purok5 28. Mataguisi 6. Purok 6 29. UpperMaton 7. Temp. Capital 30. Kapanikfan 31. LowerMaton CONNER 32. Swan 8. Ripung 33. Cabatakan 9. Cupis 34. KapanikianE/S 10. Caglayan 35. Emilia -1. Buluan 36. Malibang

FLORA RIZAL 12. Bagutong 37. Santor 38. Laya East E/S KABUG 39. RizalC/S 13. MasimotBHS 40. LiwanTown Site 41. LiwanEast LUNA 42. LiwanWest 14. San IsidroBHS 15. Pob. Luna, Luna STA. MARCELA 16. Sta. Lina 43. BarucbucTown Site 17. Francisco 44. Agria 18. Bacsay 45. ConsueloE/S 19. Dagupan 46. Sipa

PASIL 20. BalinciagaoSpring Deu

PINUKPUK 21. Alogiganbpring Dev. - 36 -

PROVINCEOF KALINGA-APAYAO

TABUK 47. San Juan Shallow 48. NambaraBliss site 49. Tabuk BHS 50. LacnagSpring Dev. 51. Calanan 52. Bolo 53. SouthernBolanao E/S 54. San Julian 55. BulanaoWest 56. Namoaran 57. Bulanao 58. Purok I Bularao 59. Balunc 60. BulanaoBHS 61. Isla Calanan

TINGLAYAN 62. Man-ubalSpring. Dev. 63. Lagod SpringDev. 64. MallangoBHS

TANUOAH 65. MangaliBHS

a/ BHS BarangayHealth Station E/ C/S CentralSchool c/ E/S ElementarySchooi - 37 -

* .~~~~~~~~.

ALA ( m ; ALrAAS l

PHILIPPINERURAL IHFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I4p IV PROVI NCE CF AKLA-

* 9URALWATER SUPPLY - 38 -

LIST OF COMPLETEDPRIP I RURALWATER SUPPLY PROVINCEOf AKLAN

ALTAVAS 27. Regador 1. Poblacion 28. Linat Bagaray 2. LumanayP/S 29. Naubo,Caliso 3. Dina-utP/S 4. Lupo E/S LESO 5. Cabugao 30. Mina 6. Malon BHS Comp. (PRIP) 31. Tayhawan

BALETE LlBACAO 7. Aranas 32. Banqa 8. ArcangelBHS (PRIP) 33. CalamcanE/S 34. GuadalupeE/S BANGA 35. JulitaBHS (PRIP) 9. San Isidro 36. OrtegaE/S 10. Libas 37. Casit-an 11. AgbanawanP/S MAKATO BATAN 38. Tuna 12. Magubahay 39. TibiawanP/S 13. Ipil 14. Talangban,Camaligan MALINAO 40. San Roque BURUANGA 41. San Dimas P/S 15. Sitio Tumansapa,Hawana 42. RosarioP/S 16. BagumbayanP/S 43. KinalangayP/S 17. Sitio Sapsapan 18. Havana MALAY 19. Sitio Labo 44. Naasag 45. Dumalag IBAJAY 46. Cabulihan 20. Naligusan 47. Cogon 21. Sitio Cu-angAgdugayan 48. San Viray 22. Sta. Cruz P/S 49. Argao BHS (PRIP) 23. Mabusao 50. Cubay P/S 24. Antipolo 51. Napa-an 25. Bliss,San Isidro 26. Buenavista - 39 -

4.g

I t

mgi * Goua",fPiao-J u.m.s

0

USAKa

NA@'

PHILIPPINERURL INIFRASTRUCTUREPROJECT -I PROVINICEOF ANTIQUIE a&pIV

* Rural Water a~ /ly - 40 -

LIST OF COMPLETEDPRIP-I RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROVINCEOF ANTIQUE

SIBALOM HAMTIK 1. Brgy. Lagdo 29. Bia-an E/S Cpd.

2. San Juan Silo BHS - 30. La Paz 3. BongbonganII 31. Brgy. Mapatag 4. SalvacionP/S Comp.- 5. BHS Cpd. PATNOGAN 6. EgaAaE/S Cpd.S/ 32. PatnonganP/M - 7. Catongan III 33. Tarog Poblacion 8. Isarayan 34. Baybay Poblacion 9. Lecaron 35. ConcepcionBHS 10. Cabar:uanP/S 36. PandananBHS Cpl. Valderama 11. Catongan II 37. Ilawad PoblacionBugasonq 12. CAmp MontagaweCubay Sermon 13. Forrer E/S LAUA-AN 14. Calog 38. Brgy. Oloc 15. Barang 39. Brgy. Jina'inan 40. Brgy. Lugta SAN JOSE 41. Brgy. Paningayan 16. San FernandoE/S Cpd. 42. Brgy. Lupaan 17. Pantao 18. Common BARbAZA 19. Supa 43. Jinalinan 20. Atabay 44. IspalgeE/S 21. Guimbangga-on 22. Capadocia TIBIAO 23. BinirayanHill 45. San FranciscoNorte BHS 46. Salazar ANINI-Y 47. Martinez 24. Casay BHS 48. Amar 25. MabuyongNorte 49. Tibiao 50. San Isidro FORNIER 51. Bandija 26. Igdanglag BHS Cpd. 27. PacienciaP/S Cpd. CULASI 28. Ysulat E/S Cpd. 52. BitadtonBHS 53. CamansijarE/S Cpd. 54. San Antonio E/S Cpd.

a/ BHS Barangay'ovalth Station c/ E/S ElementarySchool b/ P/S Primary School P - 41 -

O0A CITY

# t- / \Q .&Idb~ S~ *- Aim *°MIA ~~~~~~~~CA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*':iLIPPINE RURALINFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT Map IV PROVINCEOF CAPIZ

0 RURALWATER SUPPLY - 42 -

LIST OF COMPLETEDPRIP-I RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROVINCEOF CAPIZ

PANAY .MAMBUSAO 1. Bahit 25. Caidguid I

2. PanayP/M - 26. CaidguidII 3. Bunga 4. Lomboy CUARTERO

5. Magubilin 27. MalagabiE/S - 6. Elanay 28. CuarteroE/S 7. Tolosa OUMARAO ROXASCITY 29. SalcedoBHS 8. Cabuan 9. Baluagan IVISAN 30. Sta. Cruz PONTEVEDRA b/ 31. IvisanE/S 10. SublangonBHS 11. Guba DAO 12. Agdalipe 32. MalomayE/S 13. Solo 33. MapulangBato 14. Agbanaog 34. Nasunugan 15. Hipona 16. Intongan SIGMA 35. Acbo PRES.ROXAS 36. Capayanan 17. Marita 37. Bolago 18. Oaan Banwa 19. Pres.Poxas P/M JAMINOAN 38. Fe PILAR 39. Molit 20. Calderon 40. Macgrom 21. Sinamagan DUMALAG PANITAN 41. San Martin 22. Intampilan 42. Sta. Monica 23. TinigbanBHS 43. San Agustin 24. Ensanagan 44. DumalogVoc. School - 43 -

PROVINCEOF CAPIZ

TAPAZ 45. Enitan 46. Katipunan 47. Suvitch

MAAYON 48. Fernandez

a/ P/M PublicMarket b/ BHS BarangayHealth Station c/ E/S ElementarySchool C=7* D 1

''_ I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

I PHILIPPINE RURALINFRASTRUCTUR[ PROJECT - p I PROVIIKEOF BOHL * RL WATERSUPPLY - 45 -

LISTOF COMPLETEDPRIP I RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROVINCEOF BOHOL

ALICIA PILAR 1. Caigong,Cayacay / 25. San Isidro

2. La HaciendaBHS - 26. Danao (Catagdaan) 27. Moto (Buensuerte) 28. CatagdaanBHS 3. MandawaBHS 29. Estaca 30. Ricodoon(San Carlos) BUENAVISTA 4. Sweetlanc& SIERRABULLONES 5. Bo. Cruz 31. Sta.Cruz 6. Merrylandb/ 32. Ilaud (SanAgustin) 7. Bato P/S- 33. Ilaud (Concepcion) 8. Baluarte 34. Greenfield(Salvador) 9. Cawag 35. DusitaBHS

CANOIJAY SAN MIGUEL 10. Pagahat 36. Camanaga 11. TambonganBHS 37. Ughabi(Camanaga) 38. Cagawasan HERNANDEZ 39. San Isidro 12. East Lungsadaan 40. Tawid (Sto.Nino) 13. UlbujanEast 41. Sto. Nino 14. West Ulbujan 15. Canayawon rALIBON 42. San Agustin 16. Naatang 17. Tejero TRINIDAD 18. Laparan 43. Guinobatan 19. Faraon BHS a4. Tagum Sur

JETAFE UBAY 20. Cabognawan 45. 21. Taytay 46. Pob. Ubay 22. TaytayII 47. 23. Saguisi 48. Lumangog 24. Ilaya, Buyog - 46 -

PROVINCEOF BOHOL

VALENCIA 49. TaytayBHS 50. Nailo 51. Buyog 52. Catug-an

GUINDULMAN 53. Albur,Trinidad 54. 1iayiioaBHS

DAUIS 55. Sangculan 56. Bo. Biking 57. Bingag 58. Babugidban

PANGLAO 59. Libaong 60. Das-ag (Pob.) 61. Bolod 62. Tipolo 63. Sunrise

MARIBOJOC 64. Casangaan, Aghao 65. Cabawan

LOON 66. Cantaongon 67. LowerCanhandog 68. Tangnan 69. Taytay,Cuasi

a/ BHS BarangayHealth Station E/ P/S PublicSchool - 47 -

TEXT - 49 -

PHILIPPINES PHJLIPPINE RURAL INSFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT-LOAN 790-PH PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

I. ACKGRO=N

1.0l On April 21.1978. the Government of the Philippines signed a credit agreement with International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank for a loan amounting to $28 million (Loan No. 790-PH) representing the foreign exchange component (48% of the total project cost) for the financing of the Philippine Rural Insfracture Project-I (PRIP-I). a multi-sectoral Rural Insfrastructure Project in six (6) provinces namely: Abra in (I) , Kalinga Apayao in Valley Region (II). Aklan. Anttpie and CApiz in Western Region (VI) and Bohol in Region (VII). These provinces were selected on the basis of -heir low level of per capita income and the need for rural insfratructure facilities. The project components include communal irrigation systems, barangay (village) roads, small ports, barangay health stations and rural wa:e7 supply.

1.02 The project implementation was undertaken under the supervision of various government agencies. The National Irrigation Ad,ninistration (NIA) was responsible for the construction and improvement of irrigation system. The Ministry of Public Highways and the Ministry of Public Works that were merged into the Ministry of Public Works and Highways and now the Department of Public Works and Highways, handled the construction and improvement of barangay roads through the Bureau of Barangay Roads (BBR) are the construction of barangay health stations, community water supply and ports through Bureau of Public Works in coordination with the Ministry of Health and the Philippine Ports Authority.

1.03 The total estimated cost of the ProJect is $59 M of which S28.OOM is in foreign exchange. As mentioned. the foreign exchange cost of the Project was fully financed through the IDA credit of $23.OOM. The government provided the remaining estimated S31.00M to the implementing line agencies from annual budget appropriations. The amount of the loan were divided among the implementing agencies in approximately the followina proportions:

A G ENCYaXPERCENT NIA 2% DPWH & DOH 63% GEN. PROJ. MGT. 12% - 50 -

I1. PMOaCT WORwMULATION AND APPRATRA!

A. tWmulti6n

2.01 The Government's thrust to mobilize the rural sector in the development Stream has come up with a ru"al development croeram designed to uplift the socio--conomic conditions in the rural *reas. One of the current national development strategy for rural deveiopment is the integrated area de-elnn-ment Aporoa^% which a number of ongoing/completed rural development projects has been framed up along this concept.

2.02 In early 1977, the National Economic and Development Authority in coordination with various government agencies has come up with a concept paper for a multi-sectoral Rural Infrastructure Project designed primarily to provide relatively small-scale infrastructure works in the provinces of Abra. Kalinga-Apayao. Bohol. Aklan. Antique and Capiz.

2.03 Through the assistance from FAO-World Bank Cooperative Program and International Development- Aosociation (IDA). a Bank Appraisal Mission visited the Philippines in April 1977 to discuss with the Government the possibility of formulating the proposed proJect. Subsequently, a follow-up Bank Appraisal Mission visited in October 1977 tv further review and discusi various aspects of the project.

2. 04 Proaect evaluation started b;' requiring each acency concernde to review their respective ten-year development pzogram (1977-86, and identified schemes to meet the immediate needs of the population. Irrigation schemes were initlally evaluated on the basis of laad and water resources, willingness of farmer's to participate and preliminary cost of development; barangay roads were selected accordtng to potential pzoduction area and the need fcr preliminary field surveys of alignment and cost; ports according to alternative means of transportation and cost of impro"fement; rural health stations, according to the location of rural health units and their distance to the villages to be served; and water supply. according to the .need of small villages. Based on this preliminary evaluation, detailed feasibility studies were carried out in 1978 for irritation system which covered 25% of the project area and were representative of terrain, soils and type of diversion. Cost estimates of the road component were based on three road segments representing the terrain; and 11 segments for potential production area. Plans and detailed cost estimates were prepared for each port, barangay ,-ealth station and the equipment for rural water supply. - 51 -

2.05 Based on the findings and recommendations of the appraisal mission. the project consisted of the following:

(a) (Offiflunal T Dav.loom

construction of about 53 new irrigation system serving some 8,500 ha and rehabilitation of two existing system serving 900 ha;

(b) Banrsv Roads

(i) construction of about 820 km of new and upgrading of about 240 km of existing barangay roads; construction of about 290 km of new access roads to serve the proposed communal irrigation system. and of about 40 km of access roads to serve the proposed barangay health stations in Abra and Kalinga-Apayao provinces; and

(ii) engagement of highway engineer and consulting firms to assist with detailed engineering, design, supervision of construction and maintenance of the project roads.

(c) Ports

rehabilitation and improvement of two national ports and one municipal port.

(d) Baranzav Health Stations

(i) construction of 60 health stations; and

(ii) procurement of medical equipment, furniture, supplies and minor instruments for the proposed health stations.

(e) Rua'pl Waer_f'SPPlv

(i) procurement of drilling equipmenz and materials for the construction of about 300 wells; and

(ii) provision for training and strengthening of the existing staff of the Bureau of Public Works (BPW) at the center and in the six project provinces.

The project would also make provision for the preparation of a future rutral infrastructure project in ten provinces to be selected by the Government. - 52 -

III. PROJECT !MPLFMrNTATTON

A. Loano poetiveness

3.01 Loan negotiations took lace in Washington from March 6 to .0. 1978 for the project amounting to US$ 28.0 million. The loan was signed by the Executive Directors c," April 21. 1978 and become effective on May 6, 1978. The loan was payable within a period of 40 years excluding a 10 years grace period. It bears an interest rate of 1/2 of 1 percent per annum of the principal amount of the loan withdrawn and outstanding from time to time. The Philippine government. however, pays a commitment charge at the rate of 3/4 of 1 percent per annum not withdrawn from time to time. Amortization of the loan on semi-annual payments commenced on June 15. 1978. The Government did not encounter any difficulty in complying with the conditions for loan effectiveness set out in the loan documents.

B. Tmnlamentatlon Schedu1e

awanav RoadS

3.02 The implementation of barangay roads including the road access tc the communal irrigation systems and barangay health stations were divided into two (2) groups, those implemented by administration (DPWH) and those implemented by Contractors. Out of a total number of 140 road sections. 66 road sections with an aggregate length of 671 kms. were subjected for contract bidding by prequalified contractors. Bidding wa£ carried out in 4 major packages with 21 sub-packages consisting of 7a contracts, includinz separate contracts for 5 bridge construction, each ranginZ in estimated cost from a low of P0.5 million to a maximum of P12.2 million. The original target date for bidding was set in September 1978 but due to high rates quoted by the local consultants during the detailed engineering phase, the Bank suggested renegotiation of the bids. This delayed the bidding process until mid 1980. Contractors were given the option of bidding individual contracts or combinations which resulted in generally good competition, all contracts were awarded to domestic contractors.

3.03 Practically all contracts suffered delays in implementation for various reasons, most important of these were:

a) Problems caused by inavailability of equipment and certain materials and lack of working capital wLth many contractors;

b) Delay by Government in acquisition of right-of-way and relocation of utilities: - 53 -

c) Poor job organization and lack of managerial skill among most Contractors;

d) Complex and time consuming Government procedures for processing interim payments. certificates and construction change orders.

e) Considerable escalation in prices of construction inputs, spare parts and equipments:

f) Additional work orders found necessary due to unanticipated need for additional construction works such as culverts. riprap for side slope protection. dining of ditches, etc.

3.0 It was envisaged at the time of appraisal that the project will be completed in all respects by December 1983 together with closing of the accounts. Unfortunately, these exoectations were not fully realized. Targets of all key activities suffered partly because of unforeseen circumtances and partly due to additional discussions made necessary with the World Bank.

3.05 During the preparatory phase, the project suffered delays because of varLous reasons such as the desire of the Bank to revise economic analysis for a number of projects to check on their high cost estimates, the difficulty in hiring of consultants for detailed engineering because of their high bids which necessitated renegotiation with them including revision of the terms of reference which had to get approval from the bank, the delay in detailed engineering phase due to high rates quoted by the local consultants that made the bank to suggest renegotiation of the bids and the delay in equipment procurement due to problems of specifications as weli as pre-qualification of bidders which could be resolved only in consultations with the Bank.

3.06 Likewise, during the implementation stage there were valid reasons for delays, in some cases, the restraining peace and order problems in some parts of Abra and Kalinga- Apayao that caused the contractors to abandon or delay the construction of the proJect. The inappropriate design for some projects which were ascertained during implementation have also been a stumbling block, since these necessitated additional investigations. The considerable escalation in prices of construction inputs particularly cement, steel, fuel, lubricating oil and spare parts for equipment is the *main reason for the issuance of change orders that also caused the delay, but the PMO has exerted considerable restraint about these change orders that they investigated such cases through especially deputed teams from the PRIP Central Office. Another reason is the additional work orders found necessary in the case of roads which were completely new construction and a large number of them are located across rolling/mountaious terrain that require additional work which - 54 -

were but inevitable du- to unanticipated occurrence of rock. need for additional culverts, riprap for side slope protection dining of ditches. etc. In the course of construction of the project. there were also repeat orders for some proJects which were either washed out or eroded due to frequent typhoon occurrence.

3.07 However, in a l-rze number of cases, there were also some reasons which the contractors were themselves to be blamed for the delay or non-completion of the projects due to their incompetence. Frequent meetings were being held with these contractors to urge them to work fast, at the same time most of the poorly performing contractors have been issued warning letters at the Deputy Minister's level about possible recission of their contract.

3.08 Among the total road projects under contract. 28 proJects or U2% were completed on time while the rest were delayed from less than a year to a maximum of three (3) years. About 10% of the contract proJects were either cancelled or rescinded and were completed by administration. However. almost all (52 road proJects) of the road proJects implemented by administration were all completed on time.

Communal Trr!iastJon

3.09 The design and construction of this project was undertaken by the National Irrigation Administration (NTA). The construction of the L3 communal sub-projects started last July 1978 and was completed almost as scheduled in December 1983. Most of these sub-projects were constructed by labor intensive method with active involvement of the farmer beneficiaries in the formulation. design and construction of the systems as well as in their operation and maintenance. The constructed systems have already been turned-over to their respective Irrigators' Service Associations (ISAs) when typhoon and strong floods cccured in 1984 and 1985 necessitating repair and restoration works in some portion of the projects. The repair and restoration works were completed in May 1986.

3.10 The implementation of this project was, in seneral, satisfactorily completed as the costs and schedule of completion have generally remained almost within the appraisal estimates except for some minor slippages brought about by errors in desizn and construction of canals at Calaccad and Bagombong and of ogees at Tumalunog and Hamtic; the problems on right-of-way due to objections of some farmers to the construction of on-farm facilities and the lack of responsiveness and awareness of their responsibilities among the ISA members. - 55 -

3.11 The Bureau of Public Works of DPWTC was responsible for the design. construction and supervision of Barangay Health Stations while the Project Management Staff of DOH was responsible for its contract administration procurement of supplies and materials and operation.

3.12 The construction of the programmed 60 health stations started in 1979 and made operational in 1983. The construction of the buildings were completed and were brought to a uniform standard finish as required although the equipping and furn±shing of these stations were completed only in 1985.

3.13 The implementation of this proJect is generally satisfactory except for some minor delays caused by problems on the systems used for budgeting of project funds which resulted to lengthy delays in construction while disbursements from the IDA credit are awaited.

3.14 The Bureau of Public Works of DPWTC was responsible for the design and construction of ports. The construction and development of the ports of San Jose and Culasi were already completed although there were slippages mainly due to inability of contractors to finish the work because of increases in construction costs. The port of Dumaguit has not yet been completed at the time of this reevaluation.

3.15 The port of Culasi in Capiz was almost (87.82s) completed in 1982 when the contract was terminated due to inability of the contractor to finish the work. The rest of the work was done by another contractor and was completed in 1983.

3.16 The port of San Jose de Buenavista was already 99.17% complete when the newly constructed breakwater was damaged by a typhoon in late March 1982 and the contract was terminated in 1983. The completion of the work which was the construction of concrete wharf extension was done by another contractor and was completed in 1983. The repair of the damaged breakwater was done by another contractor and was completed last April 1986.

3.17 The construction/improvement of Dumaguit port has not been-completed due to the deficiency in the attainment of the desired soil bearing capacity of the original reinforced concrete test piles for the wharf. Instead of the designed length of 23 to 27 meters, piles now up to 0O meters have to be precasted. Along this line, the contractor - 56 -

requested for th- adjustment of unit prices which necessitated for change orders and extra work orders due to changes in quantity on several work items.

Au=lWatar SUDO1lV

3.18 The Bureau of Public Works of DPWTC was also responsible for the construction and drilling of wells. The drilling of wells was started on time. A total of 462 wells were actually drilled but only 437 of which were completed and serviceable since 1982. the other 25 wells were abandoned during the process of implementation due to unfavorable condition such as salty water, shale formation and muddy water. Noting the availability of more funds due to lower than anticipated unit costs, additional 40 wells were drilled and made operational in 1984 bringing the total physical accomplishments to 477 wells already completed although some or about 3% are currently not operational because of poor maintenance, since they were not included in the organized Water Users Association.

3.19 In general, the implementation of this component has been smoothly undertaken except for some minor slippage due to difficulties and delays in procurement of equipment and materials.

C. Pro1ect Chanbes

nArannAv Roads Conent

3.20 During the appraisal a total of 1,390 kms. of baranzay roads was proposed for construction/improvement, this included 820 kms. of new barangay roads, 240 kms. of existing roads, 290 kma. of access roads to serve the communal irrigation proJect and 40 kms. access road3 to the barangay health stations. (the list of proposed roads as appraised are shown in Annex 3.20.1). Among these proposed roads only about 46% or 639 kms. were implemented; 131 kms. of which composed of existing roads, 398 kms. new, 89 kms. as access to communal irrigation systems and 21 kms. as access to baransay health stations. The remaining of the total ; 012.095 kms. of roads actually completed were new lists of roads included as replacements to the original proposed roads because of their low expected economic returns based on evaluation and relatively high construction costs involved based on the detailed design conducted, rather they were replaced by roads which were technically and economically feasible. (see Maps I- III).

3.21 There were also minor changes in the design of some road projects especially in the case of roads which were completely new construction because the alignments pas. .ni rolling and mountainous terrains were not accurately anticipated and that it requir-d additional work such as - 57 -

additional culverts. riprap for slope protection and side ditches.

TrriZat _'on Thomconenl

3.22 The Appraisal Peport envisioned the c^struction of about 53 new communal irrigation projects serving about 8.500 hectares. and rehabilitation-/improvement of 2 existinZ systems serving 900 hectares or a total of 9.400 hectares. With the completion of the project, only L3 communal irrigation facilities were implemented of which 22 are new irrigation systems serving about 5.274 hectares and 21 are existing systems which were rehabilitated/improved covering 4.315 hectares. Despite the reduction in the number of projects implemented. the actual phys4 cal area provided with irriZation facilities increased from the appraisal estimates of 9.5'00 hectares to 9,589 hectares. Likewise. the average cropping intensity increased from an estimated 164% to 17UN and correspondinaly increasing the total effective ares (annual i.rrigable area) from 15.400 hectares to 16,705 hectares. (see Annex 3.22.1).

3.23 Moreover, out of the 43 implemented projects, 23 were included in the appraisal listings and 15 systems were new 4nclusions. Reasons for these project changes appear to be: inviability of the proposed system wherein the internal rate of return set at 10%' could not be attained: minimal source of water; steep slope; and high construction ccst particularly on the impoundlng type of diversion which the beneficiaries have been reluctant due to its high amortization payment. These factors resulted in the replacemer.t./deletion of some originally appraised projects.

Por-s rnprnimeant

3.24 Five(5) ports were initially considered for improvement under this component of the r.roject they are Culasi Port in Capiz. San Jose de Buenavista Port in Antique, Dumazuit Port in Aklan and and Port in Bohol. Of all this, only three(3) ports were actually implemented because the rehabilitation of Tutigon and Talibon Port proved to be not economically viable.

3.25 The port of Culasi in Capiz was 87.80' completed last March 1982 when the contract with JBS Construction Incorporated was terminated. The rest of the work was done by contract with Footsteps Construction. T',e repair of the concrete stairway. construction of cargo shed, deflector wave and deleted parts of the original contract were completed in 1933 following almost all the level of improvement proposed during appraisal.

3.26 The San Jose de Buenavista port was 99.17 complete when the newly constructed breakwater was damnaged by a typhoon in late March 1982. Additional work was undertaken - 58 -

in extension of the reinforced concrete wharf which was completed in 1983. The repair and construction of the damaged breakwater was completed in April 1986.

3.27 The improvement of DumaZuit Port has not been completed for reasons as explained in paragraph 3.'7. The construction of this port is still on-going with funding from national budget allocation.

Raia-nuav Health Stat1ona

3.23 Programmed for construction under this component were 60 units: seven in Abra, sixteen in Kalinga-Apayao, eight in Aklan. ten in Antique, ten in Capiz and nine in Bohol. All the 60 units were completed and made operational in 1983. except that some units under the proposed siltes were not implemented rather they were replaced by units under new sites. This was because some of the proposed units required costly access roads, others have relatively low population served and still cthers failed to meet the proJect criteria as to its necessity and accessibility because of the availability of health centers which are more accessible from the arua. Thus, new units were implemented under new sites which are more accessible and could serve a considerable number of population.

3.29 The list of completed Barangay Health Stations (BHS) in the above mentioned 6 provinces is shown in Map III.

Rural Water SunolV

3.30 This component originally had 300 wells proposed to be drilled and constructed in the depressed areas of the said 6 provinces. Because the actual cost of construction was much less than the estimated cost of construction, the physical target was raised to 418 weljs with World Bank concurrence. Thus, more wells were drilled and constructed to meet the water supply requirements of rural people within the proJect areas. A total of 477 wells were drilled and completed excluding those which were abandoned as explained in paragraph 3.18.

D. Cantra to Peraormanca

3.31 Implementation of contract Packages I and 1I started mostly in the first part of 1981 against oriZinal target of March 1979 due to some setbacks encountered during the Preparatory phase of the project (see paragraph 3.5). The contractors performance are generally satisfactory except for some which exhibited poor performance because of lack of working capital and equipment and inadequate technical capabilities. To date a total of 57 contract proJects with a total length of 527.985 kms. have already been completed, 22 contract road projects still remained uncompleted because their contracts were either terminated or rescinded. This - 59 - happenod b-cause most c. these contract projects are located in very critical rebel-infested areas which fcrced the contractors to abandon the project, while some were not completed because of inability of contractors.

3.32 Most cf tha uncompleted works of sever;a terminated and rescinded contract packages were completed by administration while some were proposed to be given to the Engineering Brigade of the AFP for completion but the Bank objected. To utilize available funds of projects affected by the very critical peace and order problems in the proJect areas realignment of funds to new projects after consultation with and approval by the Bank and the Central Office had been resorted to.

3.33 Overall, the implementation of roads under contracts have been satisfactorily completed and on time except for some which were affected by adverse weather condition and the cash flow problems of some contractors. due in part to the rapid inflation of construction costs and in part to the fact that their bids were relatively low.

E gonnu1tino Services

Oetai!Aed wrn.ine-rinz

3.311 The design of the project was carried out separately by component. The National Irrigation Administration (NIA) was responsible far the design and construction of communal irrigation projects, the Bureau of Public Works (BPW) of then DPWTC, was responsible for the design and construction of ports and drilling of wells for the rural water supply proJect, the Department of Health (DOM) was responsible for the construction of Barangay Health Stations under the supervision of BPW. For the detailad engineering of barangav roads, this was carried out by local consultants who had worked in close cooperation with the Bureau of Barangay Roads (BBR) established within the Department of Public Highways (DPH). The BBR supervised the detailed engineering through the issuance of guidelines, established standards for designs and plan preparation and make periodic reviews of all works undertaken.

3.35 Regardless of the assistance and guidelines provided by the DPH Project Office, the consultants had been solely responsible for all the data received and gathered for all designs conclusions and recommendations made by them.

3.36 The activities of the design consultants include field surveys, bridge site surveys, soils and materials inveRt1gations, pavement evaluarion and design, preparation of complete constructior, plans, estimation of quantities. detailed unit price analysis, cost estimates and assistance in the preparation of documents for local competitive bidding. - 60 -

3.37 The detailed engineering phase of the proJect was delayed by one and a half month because the Bank suggested a renegotiation of consultancy bids due to high rates quoted by local consulting firms. The target date of completion of detailed engineering design was January 1979 but the actual completion was mid of 1981.

3.38 In general, the performance of the design consultants were satisfactory and they acted favorably to the DPH/3ank decision to make them solely responsible for the work. However, it has been noted that had the consultants given greater attention to some of the routine design problems during detailed engineering design, a portion of the cost overrun could have been avoided (see paragraph 3.06).

3.39 There is no doubt that the local consultina firms gained valuable design experience and training by undertaking such responsible roles but there is little evidence that most of these firms realized significant improvements in work organization ability through development of their own middle management staff. This matter has been discussed with DPH and the consultants and improvement of this difficiency will be given particular attention in future work.

Technei Al Assitance

3.Uo The technicel assistance by consultants began in February 1981. The MPH. cognizant of the requirement of the International Development Association (IDA) have availed the services of the consultants from International Labour Organization (ILO) advisory services to assist the BBR in the implementation of rural roads planning, design construction and maintenance of the road component under the PRIP-I. For this purpose, two consultants from ILO was appointed as Rural Roads Engineer and Labour-based Engineer. The services of the Rural Roads Engineer covered 24 man-months whose duty was mainly to assist the Director of BBR in the analysis and evaluation of detailed engineering activities and prepare documents and reports pertaining to individual project where contractors are engaged. The Labour-based Engineer, whose services covered only 4 man-months, was assigned to prepare plan of action for the implementation of rural roads using labor-intensive methods, and assist and train contractors for efficient use of labor in order to develop the institutional capacity within the BBR to carry out major part of future program for rural roads with labor-based methods.

3.lI The consultants completed their work satisfactorily. The Labour-based Engineer ended his services in June 1981, the services of the Rural Roads Engineer terminated originally in July 1983 and was extended by one year to July 1984. Both consultants have contributed greatly to the efficient Implementation of the rural roads. - 61 -

IV. PROJRCT COS? AND 1uJS!MENT

A. P etcoskts

4.0l A comparison between appraisal cost estimates and final costs by component is shown in Annex a .Oll. As shown in Annex 4L.0' : the final proJect cost. excluding the feasibility studies and right-of-way is USS 48.3 million, some USS 11 million or 18 lower than the appraisal cost estimates of USS 59.0 million, Including contingencies. Likewise, the foreign exchange and local component (in US dollar equivalent) costs have also decreased by 23% and 13%. from the appraisal estimate of USS 28.0 and 31.0 million to actual cost of USS 21.5 and 26.8 million, respectively. On the other hand, the project cost in local currency equivalent showed a considerably higher final cost than the appraisal estimate by about 42% from P 436.6 million appraisal cost to p t136.6 million final cost. The foreign exchange component in local currency have also increased by 33X from the appraisal estimate of P 207.3 million to P 275.4 million while the local component increased by a bigger percentage of 50% P 229.L million in the appraisal to P 343.1 final cost.

e.02 The decrease in foreign currency (USS) value of the project cost Inspite of its increase in local currency value (P) colld be explained as the effect of various factors. The increase in local currency value of the proJect cost was attributed mainly to the longer implementation period dua to several reasons (as stated in paragraph 3.03); increase in local prices of construction materials; additional constructlon works and rehabilitation works for projects destroyed by typhoon; and delay in procurement of imported equipments. However, the decrease in dollar value of the project cost was due to a number of reasons such as the increase in foreign exchange rate; the decrease in construction cost for irrigation components because, out of the 51 irrigation projects for construction as identified in the appraisal, only 32 proJects were constructed and the rest are Just rehabilitated; inability of the contractors to complete the port improvement projects; and unavailment of the remaining balance of the loan proceeds (only USS 21.5 million was availed as against USS 28.0 million) because of the untimely expiry of the loan.

4 03 The foreign exchange and local currency components of the project cost overrun were financed entirely by the Government from its own resources.

B. DiRhuwsmentS

a .04 Disbursements lagged well behind appraisal estimates throughout the project implementation period as shown in table below. This was the result of the very slow st3rtups on most construction contracts and the much slower rate of implementation than had been assumed at appraisal - 62 -

(para. 3.05-3.07). Because of these, the closing date was extended three times; first by 12 months from the original December 31, 1983 to December 31. 193g. The difficulties and unforeseen events continued to cause the slow pace in construction activities that resulted to the reextension of the loan to December 31. 1935 and subsequently to JuJne 30. 1936 to permit further availment of the balance of the loan proceeds, but still the loan funds were not fullY di3bursed.

4 05 The disbursement rate for Category I, civll works, was increased to 45% effective December 13. 1983 in order to utilize subcategory 1 (a) for contractor mobilization which has not been disbursed at the time. The schedule of accumul.ated disbursements is shown in Annex a.05.1.

4.o6 "he allocation of loan proceeds as arnticipated in the appraisal was actually followed and changes from appraisal to final are as shown below this is in order to meet the foreign exchance requirments and to provide for the substantial increase in construction costs.

Category 3/23/'78 6'/30'36 - - - (US $ Million) - - -

T. Civil Works 19.8 17.0

TI. Equipment. Supplies

and Services 5.3 a. I

III Technical Assistance

and Training 0.6 0. 4

IV. Unallocated 2.3 6.5

T o t a 1 - "a_Q 28.

4.07 The actual schedule of costs disbursements by project component are shown in Annex 4.07.1. - 63 -

V. TNSTL TUTTONAL PFRFQRMANCF

Prcoe-t Qrc&niAtt1nn

5.01 In July 1979, the DPWTC was divided into the Department of Transportation and Communication (DOTC) and the remainin& functions to the Department of Public Works (D'W). The DPW and DPH and other national line departments automatically became Ministries following the adoption of the parliamentary system of goverment. Taking the cognizance of the importance of infrastructure as a solid foundation for national grow-h, these two huge ministries (MPW and MPH) were merged on goverment reorganization in July 1981 into Ministry of 2ublic Wo.rks and Hizt,ways (MP'H), for simplicity and economy in operation. The MPWH and other government Ministries are now reverted back to Departments following the political svstem of the new-/current administration.

Communal Tr-ization Comoonnnt

5.02 N.A in coordination with the the FSDC was the executing agency of the irrigation component. A ProJect Manager based in Manila was directly responsible for the execution of the project under the overall supervision of the Assistant Administrator for the Engineering and Operations which is likewise responsible to the administrator for the regional NIA offices which are headed by the regional directors who are responsible for all NIA activities in the project provinces constituting their regions through provincial irrization engineers. On the other hand, the FSDC under a memorandum of agreement with NIA, is responsible in organizing the farmers into Irrigation Services Associations (ISAs). recruitment and training of Institutional Offices to be assiZned to each ISA. and the operation and maintenance supervision.

5.03 On the early stage of proJect implementation, the progress of the construction and the design of future projects vary from one provinces to the other. and generally, was less than what was expected due to management aspects which requires particular attention. Much works were assigned to the provincial irrigation engineers over and above their former responsibilities with inadequate support from the Regional Offices especially on the detatl design phase and construction supervision. Moreover, the FSDC which is responsible for the institutional development aspects of tne component was, in some cases, not able to established effectively and sufficiently the management and operational requirements inputs which resulted in disparities of the proJect execution. - 64 -

5.04 However, the agency organized its administrative and executive structure in September 1930, to adequately cope with the works and m-et increasing responsibilities, particularly in externally funded projects. A major innovation in the modified set-up was the creation of four (4) offices for Assistant Administrators who assist the Administrator in major functional areas. These are (i) Project Development and Implementation (ii) Operations (ii') Finance and Management; and (iv) Administrative Services. The Office for Project Development and Implementation was created to formulate, implement, direct and supervise all foreign - assisted projects including this one, which were previously under the functions and responsibilities of the Office of Speclal ProJects. The functions of FSDC under the reorganized set-up was taken over under the Assistant Administrator for Systems Operation.

Rar-n-mf navds CimoDnent

5.05 The BBR within the then DPH was directly responsible for the proJect execution which was headed by a Project Manazer (BBR Asst. Director) based in Manila under the overall supervision of the lirector of BBR. who reports to the DPH Assistant Secretary for Operations. The proJect Manager coordlnates the work of the various divisions of BBR and of the consultants (local and foreign) under the project. PRIP field activities were administered through four regional offices under the dir ction of a regional director and in turn has eight districtoffices (Abra in reglon I. Kalinga and Apayao in Region II, Aklan, Antique and Capiz in Region VI and Bohol I and I: in Region VII) which are all headed by highway engineers. The Barangay Roads Division at each regional offices represents BBR at the regional level and the Barangay Roads sections of each distric carries out the construction, improvement and maintenance of barangay roads. Under the proJect, a separate PRIP project offices were established at the district levels under the direction of a Project Engineers who were responsible for the projects field activities which includes detailed designs, construction of projects undertaken by administration and construction supervision of contract projects.

5.06 In the goverment reorganization of July 1931 which merged the MPW and MPH into one Ministry (the MPWH and later the DPWH). the BBR was abolished and a Project Management Office (PMO) for PRIP-I was created at the headquarters to coordinate with the ProJect Engineers through the regional directors concerned in the project execution and other related activities that has been established/started by the SBR. - 65 -

5.07 The Institutional performance of this component was in some cases, disappointing despite the efforts being made to improve the implementation on a more systematic and vigorous procedure. An anticipation in the proJect appraisal to strengthen various project related offices in the n-tional, regional and provincial level proved futLle and is relatively attributable to the capacity of the implementing office (BBR) which was then new organization and have not previously undertaken large program, and emphasizing particularly the wide scope of the component which requires careful coordination, planning and management. Consequently. the reorganizations that occured during the process has greatly affected the institutional improvements and in zome cases, some factors which were beyond control of the management such as the peace and order situation. Nevertheless, the proJect has served as a good basis and considered to be relevant in any future undertakings specially on a multi-sectoral program.

Baranxav Health StAtions

5.08 At the early stages of the project, an arrangement has been made, with concurrence from the bank, whereby the BPW's Building Division will be responsible in the project execution of this component instead of construction supervision only as agreed upon during the proJect appraisal. In the process, there was a satisfactory performance in the project's physical accomplishments,however. the coordination, monitoring and provisions of other services for the health stations including water supply, lighting. essential furnishings such as examination tables and storage facilities and in some cases, medical equipment and supplies, as provided for under the project were inadequate due to financial constraints. An action program were taken into consideration to complement these defficiencies to ensure an effective operation.

Rural Water ru%Iv

5.09 The Wells and Springs Unit of BPW's Water Resources Division within the DPWTC was then responsible for the implementation of this component and following the department reorganization it was transfered to MPW Water Supply Section and later to the Water Supply Division under the Bureau of Construction in coordination with the PMO-Rural Water supply under the reorganized set up. (Merging of MPW and MPH into MPWH and later DPWH. ) The institutional performance was satisfactory which leads further to a fairly substantial increase in the scope of the water supply component of the project. - 66 -

Ports ComDonpnt

5. 10 Th- BPW's Ports and Harbors Division within the then DPWTC, in coordination with PPA were responsible for the execution of this component. Inspite of the satisfactory performance relative to the coordination of these agencies. the project experienced some implementation delays which are attributable to contractor's performance, additional works such as repairs of typhoon damates and major change orders in civil works which require substantial additional costs. An action program to complete the remaining works were taken into consideration through realignment of funds and/or inclusion in the annual appropriations.

VI. ECONOMIC RE-EVALUATION

A. Barana, Roads

6.01 The road projects are specifically aimed to provide an all-weather access linking relatively isolated villages to the mainstream of economic life of the provinces and to realize full benefits thereby increasing agricultural income and uplift the standard of living in the area. The areas served are major producers of palay, corn, coconut and some rootcrops and banana. Thirteen read protects were selected for analysis and each road was considered to represent a typical barangae' in each provinces. However, evaluation of roads in Kalinga Apayao and Abra were not undertaken d' e to limited time and critical peace and order situation in both provinces.

6.02 The inhabitants 'n the influence area benefitted substantially from lower transport costs, reduced travelling time and increased agricultural production. In the Appraisal Report, "Producer Surpls" approach has been used in the economic evaluation, thus, only the development benefits were calculated. Development benefits were expected to accelerate as a result of increased in cultivated area, crop intensification, improved agricultural practices thereby- increasing yield levels of crops. All identified new potential area for future production have been assumed to be fully cultivated and yield levels are maximized five years after completion of the road.

6.03 In the post-economic evaluation, the same methodology have been applied. However, the rate at which higher levels of production can be achieved was assumed to follow a relatively long and flat profile, thereby, benefits were expected to grow over the whole of the assessment period. During the interview with the farmers it was observed that most small farmers are subJect to financial constraints limiting their capacity to invest in agricultural inputs thus extends their response over e. period of years. Crop intensification programs and modern technology do not yet - 67 -

appear to have been easily and widoly accepted and will take some years to change the traditional method extensively used spocially in the remote areas.

6.04 In the reassessment of the economic viability of the road proJects. price increases for inputs in calculating the costs of production of crops and farmgate prices were considered and updated to 1986 level. The assumed farmgate prices are shown below while cost of production models for each crop are exhibited in Annexes 6.04.1 - 6.04.6. Project costs (economic cost) were also escalated to 1936 level and opportunity cost of capital was assumed at 15% compared to 10% used in the appraisal. Yield levels developed somewhat differently from what is expected in some of the roads but not significant enough to affect the projects. A comparison between appraisal and post-economic evaluation yield levels and maximum yields per crop are shown in Annexes 6.04.7 and 6.04.8 Farmgate Prices (P/MT) (1986)

Pal -y 3485 Corn 2400 Copra 3640 Banana 1000 Cassava 1175 Camote 1800

6.05 The results of the economic analysis are shown below Costs and benefits streams for each road project are exhibited in Annexes 6.05.1 to 6.05.13 One of the road projects showed negative returns. low on 1 road with 5.9 percent while the remaining 11 roads at batisfactory level ranging from 11.8 to 23.8 per cent.

Comparison of Appraisal and Post-Economic Returns (IRR)

Fet Estlmsat Name_of_Roads Anoratgal Post--valuation 1. Sikatuna-Sevilla 19.4 14.3 2. Sevilla-Bilar aX 23.8 3. -Candelaria 15.0 4. Gabayan-Inaghuban ..... 9 5. Ginapolan-Cambuyo 15.0 13.6 6. Malinao-Bulabod 15.0 12.9 7. Libacao-Ortega a/ 16.8 8. Balete-Calizo 19.1 ne.ative 9. Cabug Cabus-San Silvestre .a5a./ 10. Tabuk Sur-Palatian 22.3 16.4 ll. Patnongon-Cuyapyao 16.5 13.3 12. NR Calala-Apdo .1.aZ 11.8 13. Tuno-Importante 15.0 22.7

.az/ Not Available - 68 -

B. !yrlaation

6.06 The appraisal report presented ten(lO) representative commununal irrigation systems (CIS) accounting about 2.400 hectars or 25% of the total proposed systems, as test projects that were subjected to detailed feasibility study .1/ however, with the completion of the projects,two studied systems were not implemented or were rather replaced/relocated.

6.07 During the project implementation, there were some changes in service area, cropping intensities, project costs.yields and the project implementation period, as a result of which economic re-evaluation of the proJect has become necessary in order to ascertain project viability at the end of its completion. For purposes of comparison, the economic re-evaluation has been limited to the studied sysytem/CIS and likewise, the justification procedure carried out in the analysis has been established on the basis of the assumptions in the 'easibility study report and available informations from the present operations of the respective systems.

6.08 Project benefits considered in the analysis were quantified by deducting the net value of productions from with and without the proJect cases, respectively, and were derived based on past and present yields and its corresponding cost of production and yearly market prices.

6.09 The project cost used in the analysis were escalated to 1986 level and were converted into economic values for purposes of evaluation.i.e, the financial cost reduced by 15%. which was the assumed share of taxes and custom duties. Ttie estimated operation and maintenance cost per hectare is shown in Annex 6.09.1. The costs and the benefits stream of the representative systems are presented in Annex 6.09.2 - 6.09.9 including the economic feasibility parameters.

______L PPRIP - I, Irrigation Component, Feasibility Study Report dated August, 1977. - 69 -

6.10 On the basis of various significant factors/changes that occured during the project implementation, the Intern-l Rate of Return (IRR in %) of the studied SYStems appear higher from the feasibility study estimates. The higher IRR is attributable to: a) larger service area b) higher Yields and increased cropping intensities c) higher farmgateDprice; and d) in some cases reduction in project costs (see paragraph L.02). The IRR based on the study estimates and as re-evaluated for the repr-sentative systems are summarized below:

Project Representative Internal Rate Pr2vinc!e swvtAmc of Return ('N)

,Ann A i stAr .- P

Kalinga - Consuelo 18 13.1 Apayao

Bohol Madua - 20 21.5 San Isidro

Ilihan 20 17.0

Gabayan 13 23.0

Aklan MalandaYon 16 25.6

Antique Bugasong 48 a 1

Fragante 29 47.2

Capiz Ilas 23 33.7

C. RArAngAv Health Stations

6.11 Under this component of the project, the proposed construction of 60 units of Barangay Health Stations were all implemented. except that some of the proposed sites have been changed due to considerable reasons (see paragraph - 70 -

3.28). The proJects' major alm is to provide physical facilities and medical supplies to deliver first level or emergency health care. family planning services and nutrition advice to families in the rural areas. The maJority of the families in the proJect areas cannot pay for such services or cannot be treated immediately because they have to travel considerable distances to the nearest town to obtain them. The project also Include medical swpplies. or waiting porch, infants' examination room, storage room, toilet facilities and a water supply system and being manned by a midwife trained by DOH in providing health and family planning services and nutrition advice. The summary of accomplishments of Barangay Health Stations by province indicating number of patients cerved, health delivery services, referrals to hospitals and primary health care is sho,.n in Annex 6.11.1.

6.12 During appraisal no detailed evaluation has been undertaken for this component of the project. For the purpose of this reevaluation, "before and after" analysis has been applied wherein the health condition in the project areas before and after the completion of the project was analyzed. Based on the Department of Health records total crude deaths in the proJect areas as of 1985 was 12,893, which was 18.6 per cent lower than 15,839 before the opening of the project in 1979. Likewise, total infant mortality also declined from 3,373 in 1979 to 1.897 in 1985, a L3.8 per cent decrease. This only denotes that the project had contriButed greatly in the improvement of health and living condition in the project areas. Provincial data also exhibited significant decline in the number of crude deaths and infant mortalities from 1979 to 1985 as shown below:

Cr Ea_QSflJ;3 Infant MortAtitv Pronv1nee 1tE79 tQ80 X Dec. 1979 L=0 Dec-

Abra 1180 1113 5.7 26L 183 L.6

Kalinga- 915 707 22.7 324 163 L9.7 Apayao

Aklan 2L01 177L 26.1 399 178 5.5

Antique 2LL02 2002 20.0 733 3J41 L.0

Capiz 2909 23LL2 241.2 373 175 4.8

Bohol 6032 L955 17.8 1280 857 33.0 - 71 -

6.13 The major causes of deaths attributable to the inavailability of rural health and medical facilities are inJuries, pulmonary diseases. diarhea. heart diseases and maternal deaths due to birth deliveries. The main beneficiaries of the component are the poorer families of the rural population in the project area estimated at 132.503 at a cost of about USS l.1lper family.

D. 2oW.ts

6.14 The improvement of Culasi port in Capiz was completed in 1983 and have been fully-operatlonal since then, while the port of San Jose de Buenavista in Antique was already 99% completed when it was damaged by typhoon in 1932 and repair and works were completed in April 1986. The Dumaguit port in Aklan still remains unfinished because of its existing defficiency in the attainment of desired soil bearing capacity, thus. additional works have been proposed which involves relatively hizher cost of construction. The temporary wharf at Washington municipality near Dumaguit is currently being utilized instead as the port facility in the area.

6.15 Though relatively small in size compared to national ports, these ports are of major importance to the poor rural population whose inter-regional connection is based on them. As of 1985, the port of Culasi had a total of 211 shipcalls. the port of San Jose de Buenavista has 134 shipcalls and the port of Washington (temporary port of Dumaguit) has 320 shipcalls. As of the same year, the port of Culasi had a total of about 123,000 metric tons of carzo handled, while San Jose de Buenavista had 28,000 metric tons and Washington had 63.000 metrie tons.

6.16 In the reevaluation of the port proJect, the evaluation methodology previously used in the appraisal is adopted in order to come up with post-economic evaluation return. The methodology assumed that without improvement these ports handle traffic witth difficulty and will not be able to handle increases in traffic unless facilities are rehabilitated, further dilapidation of these ports would mean hardship and extra expense ?or pecple and cargoes transporting betwetn the islands. It is assumed that existinx volume of cargo would have to be shipped to and from -other islands through Iloilo port, incurring additional transportation cost by road for 100 km from Antique to Iloilo (for San Jose). 130 km from Capiz to Iloilo (for Culasi), and 200 km from Akian to Iloilo (for Dumaguit). Despite its uncompleted status, the port of Dumaguit is still evaluated based on the assumption - 72 -

th-t the existing cargo and Passenger traffic in Washington will be transfered to Dumaguit port by the time it opens and that the investment cost is tent-tiv-ly based on the latest construction cost estimate. The transportation costs by road to Iloilo was estimated based on the average truck hauling rate of F 2.20 per ton-km. Future volumi of cargo to be handled by port was estimated based on the NEDA projection of increase in trading activities of 7X in Region VI based on their Five Year Regional Development Plan (1987-1992). In this analysis, project life was extended from 15 years In the appraisal to 20 years because of the lengthy implementation which started in 1979 and actually end in 1986-87 so that the improved status of these ports is considered to start only in 1986-87 and that full benefits will accrue during this period.

6.17 The investment cost was escalated to 1986 price level and converted to economic cost net of taxes and duties. The total estimated operations and maintenance in the appraisal was also adjusted to 1986 price level and decreased by 10% based on the report that the proposed construction of storage facilities was not actually undertaken. The opportunity cost of capital is assumed at 15%.

6.18 The result of the reevaluation as shown in Annex 6.18.1. indicate that the improvement of all the three ports were economically feasible with economic returns (IRR) ranging from 18.03% to 34.7%. The Culasi port yielded the hignest return of 34.7%. next is the Port of Dumaguit with an IRR of 23.A%. The lowest IRR goes to San Jose de Buenavista port with only 13.0%. As compared to the appraisal evaluation, the result of reevaluation showed a slight difference wherein post- valuation report showed a relatively higher IRR as indicated below:

Tnternal Rate of Reaturn (%) AoMrls=a1A Post Evaluation

San Jose de 15 18.0 Buenavista

Culasi 30 34.7

Dumaguit 21 23. 4 - 73 -

E. Ru ,Al Water SUDo1lv

6.19 The project provided the rural areas with 300 village wells which are envisaged to improve considerably the availability and quality of water for the villaZers. The benefits from a safe and reliable water supply would arise primarily from a reduction in water-borne diseases and the elimination of a considerable amount of unproductive time and effort devoted to hauling water over long distances. These benefits have not been Quantified in the appraisal, and still in this reevaluation, due to inavailability of data but these are judged to justify the small per capita investment of about USS 38.3 given the estimated total population served of about 110. CO;.

VII. BANK'S PERFORMANCs

A . PrnA4eet Formulatio and P"Onhwstion

7.01 The project formulated by the Bank was substantially in agreement 1ith the Government's efforts to uplift the Socio-econcmic conditions in the rural areas through the integrated area development approach. The proJect was formulated in order to provide relatively small-scale infrastructure projects such as the construction of Barangay roads, BaranZay Health stations and Pural Water Supplies and the improvement of ports, which assure efficient facilities to promote health and economic well-being of the rural populace in the six(6) selected provinces of Abra, Kalinga-Apayaot Bohol. Aklan. Antique and Capiz thus the principal objecti4es of the projects were generally met.

B. ropect Tmolementation

7.02 The implementation schedule prepared by the Bank's appraisal mission proved to be overly optimistic and did not allow adequately for Government lengthy administrative procedures and the delaying effects on construction activities of some unavoidable factors such as the difficult weather condition and the peace and other situation. In addition, the project encountered sad experiences that also led directly to the delays in the implementation, which would be attributed in part or wholly to the Bank's relatively ieXative attitudes. Due to the Bank's non-concurrence of the quoted - 74 -

costs of consultancy services for which a reevaluation of the proposals was emphatically recommended, the detailed engineering of the Barangay roads component was delayed for almost one and a half years setting back to about two years the construction schedules or ttme frames of the contract packages. The renegotiation of the costs of services caused major discrepancies in the detailed engineering of far-flung mountan'ous *reas which were detected only during actual implementation, from Which many costly change orders ensued. Likewise, the aloofness and tactless attitude of some members of the supervisory missions particularly during the early stages of implementation has at several instances been the caus- of disenchantment especi.lly among field officials of implementing agencies that resulted to lukewarm cooperation and loss of interest in attending meetings with the Missions.

7.03 On the other side of the matter the World Bank had helped keeping the project in the stream. Through suggestions, recommendations and follow-ups the problems that could have aggravated farther the delay were resolved in due time. Th Central Office of PRIP-I takes cognizance of the important role played by the Bank which involves among the following

1. Assistance that expedited the supply and eleveries of heavy and light construction equipment including service vehicles for the barangav roads, rural water supply and the communal irrigation components.

2. Assistance in strengthening by way of suggestions the coordinative link for effectiveness in project implementation between the central, regional and district levels of management.

3. Assistance in the strengthening of staffs to facilitate the design of the irrigation facilities and structures.

4. Recommended the employment of sufficient engineers to highway district offices to work with the selected local consultants for gainful experience.

5. Timely concurrence of the approved tenderdocuments or contract papers forwarded related to the constr.zction of barangay roads. barangay health stations and ports and the early approval of requests for works by force account.

6. The mission were very supportive in the discussions of financial matters like CDC's including policies that have bearings on the Project.

7. All-out support for staff civil engineers attendinZ short trainings and seminars abroad that have relevance to the Project. - 75 -

8. Instrumental to the granting of loan extensions that would have been difficult and doubtful without the missions advices.

7.04 In its entirety the Bank did much in assisting the countryside development. The agreements and disenchantment that pervaded during the initial stages of project implementation and which resulted to extreme civility especially on the part of the implementors because of attitudinal differences of the early missions later on turned to cordi3l and harmoniuos Partnership in the pursuance of the ProJect's objectives and coals.

VllI. CONCL"STONS

A. Qverall Assesment

8.01 The major objectives of the ProJect were met by providinZ an all-weather road access to markets, health stations and irrigation systems for the rural population: irrigating a number of farmlands to increase the yield of rural production; providing rural health stations to promote health and serve the medical needs of the rural populace and improving the water system to provide safe and potable drinking water.

8.02 The implementation of the Project took about four years longer than envisaged at the time of appraisal, with some leftover projects still on-going under national fund. The delays in implementation were due to circumstances which could not have been foreseen at that time. The extent of delays, however, could have been reduced by a less dema.iding time schedule particularly for the selection of consultants and the construction of civil works (see paragraphs 3.05 to 3.07).

8.03 Although the efforts made were generally successful, improvements were needed in subsequent projects related to monitoring and controlling cash advances and development of procedures for prompt price escalation adjustments, thus, it would help if for future projects, basic project data were computerized and updated regularly, so as to permit easy access to essential Information regarding the project. In addition, unnecessary complex administrative procedures for processing construction change orders and interim payments caused financial problems and time delays to several contractors in the initial phases of construction. Although procedures were improved during the project period, earlier attention to potential problems in this area would have saved much time and trouble.

8.04 Apart from the cost overruns, and the delayed completion of the project, and despite the difficulties - 76 -

encountered with most of the Contractors, the Project has been completed in * generallY satisfactory manner.

B. Fo11ow-uo Att1nn

8.05 It is suggested that the Bank should continue to pursue with the Government the detailed investigation and evaluation of the Future Infrastructure Component of the Project for the other ten depressed provinces in the country for possible implementation in the future. - 77 -

ANNEXES PRIP-1PCR: LIST OF BARANGAYROADS PROPOSED IN THE APPRAISAL

ki105. slide. bk 0.8g S. lega*il Gel No. Aggeraptle. 2.16es*. U.W 1.4.1 C., M.. U.., Am 0.SA, 0.. Wei.9 8 ft.. U...tApulin

S go 06 M I 34.1W, a,gf,&...g. - 14 4 64 h cel.ee-oa-m.l.. - I - IA M. Seed Iomblle-ftsaw go SI a Ulae.b.-1eS.16p - U) I) 46 13 a.l..-ee.- S 50 00 0 IS U.. .m-11 deg.I A.lI.. Ia is- I S..ee-.le- Is Is 39 35 .1... e4l.0is- 0S be 80 IA.S. . isA is 0 0..I..-U.~~~~~.Ae.e. - S~I is 3 It D. aged *-u.teI Ia s Is9 *..efs,1A.1...-lo

S 0 3 - I 0 ee.e - - meSS U. Used 16-a4101. is)l P S...A.e-0. S.d4 - 0 O . ROSS is. III..-1-.a is Is 46 Gol 0.1-. 1 M1b.6-04.ae...1 1 * .Sed9. 0"geeSA.coS-."8hl* 1010 5 *2 D". A&S.6-0.1obm 50 as v. SeeadEl. U0A-.e 4 a. Seed El. Is 54 39 10 S..gIle-Ueee..gmg I - 0 40~~~~~~G43 radseae-basAA..d I 0 14 60 As 004.da-AoiS.Is# 4 0 Is AS Al U.s...g.6-Sm.gII - 44 LAg06eO 0 Is 10 so 04 U. S*ed #I. Bal.A.-C.S.gw.e - 16,mes-iiee - Is Is 39 4 16S.rb.c-T...lemes, - It is t0 01 a. b.cd El. ou.a.-F... be1 to Is 5 l IS 1 l - 8 - 46 U. Seed 16gami-fulae. - Is at 301 5b Fa..-ilabas Is C.Sae~mad-B5e5SOg S S 1A Sl.eLee. 46 49 11..lgd-MS.m.d - It 14 - Of JbL*"I4.4SA*S S I 0a II S. Lined 4s.k.e.21d.. - 10 10 39 40 hpleas-4.v.e 1 10 0. Seed As5iegb. - If & 0511N 3 1 it rall..S.egmea-he.l is - Is M mg.lU Ii il i IS A..V.I-L.O. II Is 0hui..IhtiIiuJ.m1 It Lb0.-IA.Sp. Is of5 46 ksmaLlyIlh aiuu m 5g oma la ll-ei.A... I 0 0 - 40 Coos-. I I I Is SO 1I.I.Saee - A S 10 to so. J...-Geles..I.beft 0 050 a I SeIInp-es-l. to0 t0 M1 imelmee" - - 39 C-edel"* - S S is 1 1 - IStl.bee.- Ie.-mAI SO St 5.844. is ftmbp.0 4 4 1.04.5.1 21 )j j )9 1 C.le.Sed 0s Is 1600.. - L i i 14 OW"S". - I uL 1ok. IsJlulaizlm104.02.1 £- 4

341. S to5 it 04m - 4 4

- is Is Is 01 S.3iess-S.eaem- 4 IS SI L. 0 .egI.mo it *Ide. 3 - 0 C&IM.0. 4,4 S I 01 0411g. Ce. 4..- imASlel 33 LI 13~~~~~~~~204 II.uIm - I 01 Maxell - 4 1116111a -ti011L11015IfO* . 5 S..ema.gi 4A 39 Sel.61 de 1 -

A..0l*I*l - U~~~~~~iIft If O CaI...

10 lemOWA3S 1 II UieSlaa - 3 3

0 rs"loclsl .. 1,44461 it~ebseel au au la 401am..gs.I.ca. Seal.. 4k IS lb.. ... l.m.b..l. 4 Sm.1pI..9.. Slb.n I ______

o. 9m.1".I.l 91. U. ta9 41Is . ewm9*.g. .9 9... i.t.ts 9.I. 9wu4eISSM1b41864isO is00 is

9S P. go....-Is9 it4*9.SIG..SIII.9 S Is is III 9.. towco-9M4.i - 94 4 - 93 94.l.-. 9.6.- 3 14 III) P.. 11"i 0-i.. 59)...;,. Is 9 It 3 .94 m~9.~9S It a. B.".dCee-A .2 9 9 4 sit vap.e-1l..d 3 at 4 i B.9.m-so" .1d.d Sb IS " a. 11-a. 1 9 G4,-....a its J,..ISa.9 is is Ie9 a.e.so".*ctds4bl. ii is 91 9. 9.40. L~~~m.-S.esIee4 * a. 93 999~al is.-S..- E4 U. so" ee-9.e. I so S ii .. 9..d** S.g....p-l.eg.l..~..9 am a. 9*6 ~9.ie4e.... - 93 91 40 S"III S.6. Seed Ce- -Be I

961 P. Re.d. Le.-Ueph... 9 9 9 a..3 12..-* 1 .. a a 40 946 S..1)l.-51.e - 5 4 99* 9.. S.eImI.-SeeiStite 9 4~ Is 9*4 odese.. 644 ,10.- - 949 9. Seed M4 ee 9e 4 9 943 9. .. t9.e- a to .

944 C...se.-Se..ee b.i a go a. ~~&.uAtI.. leelle.~~ Scale.. to hn*5Its ' et. to94.Ip.al94) C.bepea 1-iSebe. 1 14) 9 9915B.e.". .~-9 9 . 44.I.4.le 4 Is9 904 11e0ul. le9 934 16mb. 5 9to 141 c..je.es.."eue- 3 9 4 10119e9.. 4 - II? 5a1.d. - 5 9 9649U3.4ed.a*.. Is914 Ass 9.. 1.. - 4 - Its Sapd.pee - 49 ftvobvp-ce.16.0 is9 so off 141.;ee 9 ato Si9 Cole-ea.- 994, c.3.e.w ...- J.lmll a. a.

see C.lwo 4e; 1 96 6 l;a3- j 4UleI. .em.l SpIm 399 3.. 3 34 - ke

II4.19 I £1 is ) e~. III 6 6~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~II90.

44.00.... da ~ ~ ~ 36 U t06 LS 16S99*1900 *ie,Ce - 34) 301 *10SS 36 36 40~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~ /

- 81 - Annex 3.22.1

COMPARATIVEDATA ON REPRESENTATIVESYSTEMS (APPRAISALAND ACTUAL)

Service Cropping Financial FinancialCost Province RepresentativeSystem Area Intensity Cost Per Hectare (ha.) (%) (P1000) (P1000)

Kalinga- CONSUELO Apayao As Appraised 200 138 1819 9.1 As Implemented 276 170 2036 7.38 %*Change 38 23 - (23)

Bohol MADUA - SAN ISIDRO As Appraised 100 180 794 7.94 As Implemented 200 170 1584 7.92 % Change 100 (6) - (0.25) As Appraised 115 135 850 7.39 As Implemented 142 141 1136 8.00 % Change 23 4 - 8 GABAYAN As Appraised 100 170 1454 14.54 As :mplemented 350 143 3274 9.35 % Change 250 (19) - (56)

Aklan MALANOAYON As Appraised 220 168 1778 8.08 As Implemented 300 200 1449 4.83 % Change 36 19 - (67) Antique BUGASONG As Appraised 1100 182 4788 8.08 As Implemented 1117 200 4227 3.78 % Change 2 10 - (15)

FRAGANTE As Appraised 100 121 948 9.48 As Implemented 184 200 684 3.72 %0Change 84 65 - (155)

Capiz ILAS As Appraised 700 146 4522 6.46 As Implemented 700 180 7303 10.43

° Change 0 23 - 61 Comparisonof Appriasaland ActualProject Cost in US Dollar (US $ 1,000)

APPRAISAL A CTUAL PERCENTCHANGE Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total unmnunalIrrigation Systems 6320 5080 11400 4366 3825 8191 (31) (25) (28) arangayRoads 16200 14800 31000 19511 14940 34451 20 1 11 Improvementof Ports 1300 900 2200 1861 414 2X75, 43 (54) 3 arangayHealth Stations 640 160 ,900 402 143 545 (37) (45) (39) turalWater Supply 800 2200 1000 670 2198 2868 (16) - (4) )reparationof FutureRural InfrastructureProject 800 300 ItJo ------)nallocated 4940 4460 9400 - 033 033 - - -

TOTAL PROJECTCOST 31000 28000 59000 26810 21519 48329 (13) (23) (18)

0A :

.- Comparisonof Appraisaland Actual ProjectCost in PhilippineCurrency (P1000)

A P P R A I S A L A C T U A L PERCENTCHANGE Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total

CummunalIrrigiation Systems 46750 37650 84400 55884 41860 97,744 19 % 11 16 BarangayRoads 119880 109520 229400 249702 210280 45V982 108 92 100 Improvement,of Ports 9620 6670 16290 23813 4177 27990 147 (37) 72 BarangayHealth Stations 4740 1920 6660 5142 1163 6305 8 (39) (5) Rural Water Supply 5920 16280 22200 8581 17922 26503 45 10 19 1 Preparationof FutureRural InfrastructureProject 5920 2220 8140 ------Unallocated 36560 32990 69550 - 5 5 - - -

TOTAL PROJECTCOST 229390 207250 436600 343122 275407 618529. 50 33 42

x 4"

0 - 84 - Annex 4.05.1

RURAL INFRASTRUCTUREPROJECT-I PROJECTCOMPLETION REPORT

ACCUMULATEDDISBURSEMENTS

Bank-Group Appraisal Actualtotal X Shareof FiscalYear Estimate Disbursement Actualto Appraisal _ _ _ _ - (US $1000) - - - - -

1979 200 645 322 1980 P. 2,803 36 1981 23,500 6,897 29 1982 3.iACO 9,260 24 1983 50,5f0 13,455 27 1984 28,000 .1,896 60 1985 19,936 71 1986 21,521 77 PROJECTCOSTS AND DISBURSENENTS (LOCALAND FOREIGNCOMPONENTS) (IN THOUSANDS)

BarangayRoad IrrigationRural Water Ports baranay Unallocated Total Supply or Health Allocation (S) 14,800 5,080 2,200 900 260 4,760 28,000 Availed (S) 14,940 3,825 2,198 414 143 3 21,523 Balance (Cancelled) ($) 140 1,255 2 486 117 4,757 6,477 Breakown of Avallments FOREX (Approved 1979 (S) (37) (548) (-) (-) (60) (-) 645 fq4ivalents) 276 4,082 439 4.797 1980 (M) 651 404 858 211 28 (-) 2,158 v 5 026 3,036 6.544 1,601 215 16.422 a Igo: (s) 2,238 616 1,106 89 45 (-) 4,094 , F 18,292 4,902 8,547 712 353 32,806 ' 1982 S 1,424 899 38 2 2,363 12,571 7,645 (- 325 14 (-) 20,555 1983 ( 3,583 377 232 (-) (-) (3) 4,195 1984 (S)43,225 (4.093' ,8j 5(t's 61,746 1984 () 3,016 424 1 (- () -) 3,441 p 54,315 7.405 26 61.746 j985 ($) 2,677 355 (-1 (-) (8) (-) 3,040 49,731 6,578 141 56,450 j986 ($) 1.309 201 g-) (75) (-H -2 1,585 26,844 4,120 - 1,539 32.503 TotalApproved FOREX (5) 14,941 3,824 2,197 413 143 3 21 521 f0RKXIq4ivv,ent p 210,280 41,861 17,921 4,177 1,162 5 275.406 fop P 249,702 55,884 8.581 23,813 5,142 (-) 343,122 TOTALPROJECT COST 459,982 97,745 26,502 27,990 6,304 5 618,529

x

0 -J PALAYPRODUCTION COST MODELS

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Rainfed TV Low/ Rainfed Irrigated Rainfed Irrigated Irrigated Irrigated Upland Upland HYV TV HYV HYV HYV NYW (Pesos/Crop/Fectare) Low High Medium Low High Medium/LowMedium/High Very High Yieldrange (tonne/ha.) 0.8-1.2 1.2-1.5 1.6-2.0 1.8-2.2 2.1-2.5 2.3-2.7 2.8-3.4 3.5-5.0 CentralYield Assumption(tonne/ha.) 0.94 1.4 1.7 1.92 2.45 2.56 3.0 4.0 Labourvalue (P/ha.)* 1,825 2,075 2,075 2,540 2,540 2,850 3,035 3,625 Mandays/Ha.(No.) 55 65 65 80 80 90 95 115 Animaldays/ha. (1o.) 15 15 15 18 18 20 22 25 Seeds(50 kg.)(,?/ha.) at 4.50/kg. for TV and F6.10kg. for HYV 225 225 305 225 305 305 305 305 am ------...------__--_____--___-_.__-_-______------Fertilizerkg./Iha. N 0 14 20 27 37 54 92 92 PK 0 7 10 15 21 30 21 42 Value(PlO.14/Ikq.) (P/ha.) 0 213 304 426 588 852 1,146 1.359 Chemicals(P/ha.) 0 20 SO 268 337 380 423 537 Depreciation/repairs(P/ha.) 30 45 55 60 66 72 72 72 Sub-Total(P/ha.) 2,080 2,578 2,789 3,519 3,836 4,459 4,981 5,898 LandDevelopment Dosts (P/ha.) 140 370 535 535 600 535 465 400 Irrigationcost1s (/ha.)# 0 0 0 1,290 0 1,290 1.290 1,290 Total(W/ha.) 2,220 2,948 3,324 5,344 4,436 6,284 6,736 7,588 Total(P/ton) 2,362 2,106 1,955 2,783 1,811 2,455 2.245 1.897 g

Humanlabour valued at centralwage rateof P25.00/dayand animallabour at P30.00/day. -87- Annex6.04.2

CORN PRODUCTIONCOST MODELS

(Pesos'Crop/Hectare)

Yield (ton/ha.) 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.0

Labourvalue* (P/ha.) 985 1.270 1.450 1,580 1,680 1,730 Mandays/ha.(No.) 25 34 40 44 48 50 Animaldays/ha. (No.) 12 14 15 16 16 16 ------…------_-_ ------Seeds (15-20kg./ha.) (P/ha.) P4.00/kg. 60 64 68 72 76 80

Fertilizerkg./ha. N 0 2 7 12 23 46 PK 0 2 5 10 16 25 Value (pl0.14/kg.)(p/ha.) 0 41 122 223 395 720

Chemicals(P/ha.) 0 23 45 80 125 200

Depreciation/repairs(P/ha.) 30 30 30 30 30 30

Sub-Total(P/ha.) 1,075 1,428 1,715 1,985 2,306 2,760

Land developmentcosts (p/ha.)** 95 95 95 95 95 95

Total (p/ha. 1,170 1,523 1,810 2,080 2,401 2,855 Total (P/ton) 2,340 1,904 1,810 1,733 1,601 1,428

Human laborvalued at centralwage rate of P25.00per day and animal labor at P30.00/day. ** Land developmentannual cost is not defferentiatedfor the range of indicatedyields because present cropping practice for corn reflects relativeinsensitivity of yields to land development. COPRA PRODUCTIONCOST MODELS

I 11 III IV V TraditionalTraditional Traditional Improved/Hybrid Hybrid Annual;Characteristics Low Medium Nigh Medium Full Pot?ntial

At Matur_!y

Yieldcopra tonnes/ha. 0.3-0.7 0.8-1.2 1.3-1.7 2.5 4.0 Nuts/hectare 1,000-3,0003,000-5,500 5,500-7,500 10,000-12,000 15,000-25,000 Nuts/bearingtree 20* 30-35 50 80 150 Mandays/hectare 15 25 35 42 50 Fertilizerkg. NK/ha. (P10.14/Nutrientkg.)** - - 20 100 180 1 Firstbenring year 8 7 6 5 4 X

Land developmentcosts P/ha. 1,500 1,915 2,255 2,660 3,000 Nursery,land preparation, planting(Mandays) 15 25 30 35 45 Seedmaterials P/ha. 400 570 770 1,500 2,500 Chemicals/miscellaneousP/ha. (annual) 100 200 300 500 700 ------.------…------.. ------____ --- -___ -___ -_ - ______-______Total (cost/tonne)*** 3,038 2,279 2,108 2,328 1,935

* or very sparseplanting ** Fertilizerinputs are estimatesof annualpeak requirementsbeginning year 8 for III and year 6 for IV and V. AAnnual costs and yieldsdiscounted over 50 years at 15 per cent,assumes labour at P25.00/Manday.

x ?I

C3J - 89 - Annex 6.04.4

CASSAVAPRODUCTION COST (198.6)PRICES (AnnualCost per Hectare)

Traditional Improved

Yield (MT/Ha.) 8.0 20.0

Mandays: No./Ha.* 70 100 p/Ha. (p25.-/Manday) 1,785 2,550

Cuttings: No./Ha. 4,000 6,000 p/Ha. at P0.50/cutting 2,000 3,000

Fertilizer:Kg. NPK/Ha. 55 70 p/Ha. (p10.14/Kg.NPK) 558 710

Chemicals: p/Ha. 220 290

Depreciation:P/Ha. 90 90

Land Development:P/Ha. 200 200

Total Costs: p/Ha. 4,853 6,840 p/Ton 607 342

Includesanimal days representing10% of man-daysand valuedat p30.00/dayexclusive of operator'swage. - 90 - Annex 6.04.5

SWEET POTATO(CAMOTE) PRODUCTION COST (AnnualCost per Hectare)

Traditional Improved

Yield (MT/Ha.) 4.5 20.0

Manday: No./Ha.* 60 115 P/Ha. (P25.00/Manday) 1,530 2,935

Cuttings: No./Ha. 7,000 30,000 P/Ha. at PO.25/cutting 1,750 7,500

Fertilizer:Kg. NPK/Ha. 55 275 p/Ha. (PIO.14/Kg.NPK) 558 2,789

Chemicals: P/Ha. 220 1,315

Depreciation:p/Ha. 85 85

Land Development:?/Ha.** 300 300

Total Costs: p/Ha. 4,443 14,924 p/Ton 987 746

…------…--…----

Includesanimal days representing10% of man-daysand valuedat P30.00per day exclusiveof operator'swage. Basedon developmentcost of land plantedto rainfedpalay, assuming sweet potato(camote) as secondcrop producedfor commerce. 91- - Annex 6.04.6

INDICATIVEBANANA PRODUCTION COSTS-DOMESTIC VARIETIES Al1996PRICES) (Saba,Lacatan, Latundan, etc.)

PoorerManagement Levels and/or Soils

Annualaverage yield (tons/ha.) 3.5 5.25 10.0 Bunches/hill*(annual average) 1.0 1.5 2.0 Hills/hectare 280 280 400 Spacing(M) (6x6) (6x6) (5x4) Land development(annualized over 10 years) (p/ha.) 100 100 150

ESTABLISHMENTCOSTS Land preparationand planting Mandays/ha. 20 25 30 Animaldays/ha. 15 18 20 Value (p/ha.)** 950 1,165 1,350 Plantingmaterial (p/ha.) 340 400 580

EstablishmentCost-Total (P/ha.) 1,290 1,565 1,930

- annualize.'over five ratoons (p/ha.) 385 465 575

ANNUALCOSTS Annuallabor (Mandays/ha.) 35 42 62 Value (p/ha.) 875 1,050 1,550 Fertilizer(Kg. NPK/ha.) 0 0 0 Value (p/ha.at P10.14kg. NPK) 0 0 0 Misc. Costs (p/ha.) 60 70 70 Sub-Total 935 1,120 1,620 Total Costs (p/ha.) 1,420 1,685 2,345 Cost P/ton 406 321 235

Average12.5 kg. per standardbunch (range8-17 kg.) Human laborvalued at P25.00/day Aa4bx6.04.7

COIIPAPISOHOF1986 YIELD LEVELS BY (POP APPRAISALAND POST - ECONONICEVALUATION

P A L A Y COFH COPRA

IRRIGATED RAINFED UPLAND N AS PROJECTEDACTUAL AS PROJECTEDACTUAL AS PROJECTEDACTU1A AS PROJCTIEDACTUAL AS PROJECTED ACTUAL

SIATlUINA- SEVItLA - 2.12 2.00 - 0.92 0.60 0.92 2.00 SEVILLA- DILAR h-d. 2.80 a.. 1.30 - b a. 0.80 ma. 1.20 GAUAVAN- INAGtUDAN i.. 3.00 . 2.00W - - ... 0.70 a.a. 0.60 GINIUOLAN- IAIBIYO - - 1.96 2.-t0 1.40 1.,0 1.26 1.10 0.96 0.9 NALINAO- BULABOD 2.62 2.70 :.92I8 1.80 1.62 1.10 - 1.40 1.62 1.20 LIDlAO - ORTEGA 22a,a 50 a.d 1 51 r. a. 0.70 a 0.70 a... 1..0 DlAETE- CALIZO - - 3.41 1.20 1.91 0.50 - - 0.71 0.50 CAIW-CA9BUG- SAN SILVESTRE - - a.a. 2.h .00 0.90 1.10 ma. .50 TA1USUR - PAIAGIAN - 2.66 2. 0 - 1.50 1.26 - PATNONGON- CUVAPYAO 4.16 4.00 1l6b 2.00 1.16 1.20 2.26 0.80 1.06 1.6 NR TO CALAIA- APDO rl.a. 3.40 f.A. 2.40 r. a. 1.40 I.&. 0.30 i.e. 1 20 JlINO- IMPOiTANTE 3.00 3.20 2.00 2.10 1.40 1.30 - 12.0 1.10 1.0 Ai,de. F-044,

(ONPARISOOf PROJECTEDNAXINUN YIELD lELS BY lPQP APPRAISALAND POST - ECONOMICEVAlUATION

P A L A v CQPN COPPA

IRRIGATED RAINfED UPLAND Appraisal P(R Apptaisal PCRP Appra2isa P(P Appraisal P(F A|paii P(F

1.4) 1.00 I. SIKATIUNA- StVILA - - 2.20 2.80 - - 1.00 -. j... I.40 SEVILLA- BILAR ..a. 4.00 h.a. 00 j. 1.4D6 -a.1 F.3. I.'*1 fi.j I (ADAVAN- HIUAN fi.a. 4.00) r,. I I.,O 1.9Q) 1.00 1.7Q) (lNAPf.AN- (AHIUY0 - - 2.00 .8!5 7Q 2.20 1.70 '.10 NALINAO- BULA8OD 2170 4 bQ 2.0Q 2.60 1.70 I 9a - I.DQ .. 2 LIPACAO- ORlEGA L.i. ;-80 n.j. 2.10 n.a. 1.30 n.a. - - 0.75 1.0 6ALETE- CALIZO 3.45 2."I0 1.95 1.30 1.50 CABUG-CABUG- SAN SILVESTRE - - .a. 2.80 n.a. 1.70 .9 0 - - TAIUl SUR- PALAGIAN - - 2.70 10 1.30 2.30 - 1.10 PA71N01ON- (IUYAPYAO 420 4.00 1.70 2.80 1.2Q I.0 1.2P 1.6) n.j. NR TO CALALA- APDO b.a. 4.00 r.a 3.00 r..a. 2.hQ h- 5.'.( I l '0 TUNO- INPOPTANTE 3;.0' 4.00 2 0(0 2.90 1.d:J 1.10 - .' - 94 -

ANNEX 6.05.1

ROAn COMPODNENT

SIK::ATUNA - SEVILLA Costs and ftnef its Stream (in 1000 Pesos)

C 0 S T S YEi'F ------BENEFITS CotNsSTRUCTION MAI NTENANCE

-4 27.7. 00 C). Ch., 904.00 ,.OC, 9t4.)04 . ()- -i 231.C)0 Co.00 46. O0 . 00 46.4.0 77.90 '~ 46.Of's'A 5S.5(: _' 46.00 241.70 4 1 15. !CO 27.qO W46.00C3 416.70 6 46.00C) 416.70 7 46. 00 513.SC 2 46. 00 614.2 0s 9 1 15. 00 718. 10 1C) 46. 00 e8.5.40 11 46.00 825.40 12 46.00 933.20 1_. 46.00 1Q45. 40 14 1 15. 00 1160. I 0 15 46. 00 91.7 ) 16 46. 00 971.7C0 17 46. 00 I1108.90 16 46. 00 12:50. 5c0 I 115. 00 1396.70

NET PRESENT VALUE ¼O1T 15%, 1I-7,f00 F) ...... -744. S;3 SENEFIT/COST RAPTIO C!',4T 15%) . . S6 INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN . 14. i - 95 -

ANNEX 6.05.-

R'-AD CtMPFONE-NT

SEVILLA - BILAR. Costs and Senefits Stream 'in .1000 Pesos)

C 0 5 T S YErAR --- _-______--- BENEFITS COMSTR:IJCTIOr MAINTENANCE

I1s: 9 .1 17 7 -. 'I): C C . 0.0C 1981 1578. 00 0.00 v9s2 4900 t . 0.o I q87 49. Ot) 148.20 1984 49.00 '02.70 1985 49.00 4631. 50 1 77S6 1 '2. 00C 6 ;, E 0 i 987 49. 60804. SO 1928 49. 00 804.20 49. 00 989.90 1 990;} 49.00 1181.40 1991 123.O0 1379. 44 1992 49. 00 15e3.Qo iq99-' 49.00 156.00 199 4 49.00 1778.9(? 19-'5 49.00 2002. 90 1996 12 3. 0c 2234.10 1997 49.00 1918.50 1998 49.0OC 1918.50 1999 49.00 27o4. 6( 2000 49. 00 2 7,'9.2) 200)1 123. 00 3132.40

NET PRESENT VALUE (AT 15'., i000 F') *...... 2074.6 5 SENEFIT/COST RATIO (AT 15',) ...... 1.73 INTER:NAL RATE OF FETURN ...... 27.21 996 -

ANNEX e

PCOADCO:IMPONENT

SIEFPFA BULLONES - CANDELARIA Costs andS benefits Stream Ion 100 Pesos)

C:: s r S rEAF -- BENEFITS CONSTPICT I OiN MAINTENANCE

'4. 15 0.00 1 R:-:._. tI:i-.t>. ,-'t) () .t)

4C)~~~~~~~C . ;9~~~~~-S:: ..454)~4.. I 67 I % 24.40 74E.~ 1n-:.. _4.40 z4tl7e. V;: 7 .-. Il-05 594. t9-:4.40:). 241.4e. 27.7.) -: 1 .8',; izCB~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ coret,) 593 .2-T I 41 .27 1 4 1IC i 4.-n) 1 -;:P.

49e.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .. e .)5' 597. - j l 1997 v161- 7 1 §~-:5 .. , 2 '->1r 1c05( I 99 v-I u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IIC l9j99 . et-C>'~~~~~~~~~~~~~)l 5,; 2.:: CiCz) C) Ce:z) -7

2f:>Cj~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~61.(e.:5 1 2:B'e. 2C)t:l2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~76 e O .- I 19 .- 6.7

e l - . 5:!57 ; . t):

NET PFOESENT VALI-IE (AT 15%, 1)t)P-) ...... -:28C().: BENEFIT/C:Ci:ST RATIEI eAT 15%) ...... OC-::- INTERNAL PATE O~F FETIIPN ...... 1-.77- 97

A4NNEX 6t.05).4

GABAYA4N- ; INAGI)IJAN Costs and Benmf its Streamn i :n 100Cs)Pesns-,)

c0 8 T 8 'YEA1 ------BENEFiTS 1: :3",J.:T Rl.J. TI 'N0w, MI NTE?-JANiCE

i9':2 'L 1 46t. r;C:& ;). or 19,37.'.(}.:t C). 00 1934 5S2.4. Ov': C-.).C0O I IPG': 40:. 00C;;.u

1 9R7 40t. 00r: 1'd.6. 9C0 t 7?32' 4k'%,,.)r, 1 Cf . 7,.;, 1 :;'S29 99'. C)(., 244, *Csr) 1 ?'?; 4&:>. Cs' t~~~~4 21~GS SC. 19 ? 1 40). '98 2: . 5C') 1?9 40. 72p-!4:, C \) . 9 C:! I~ 99Z~ 4, -,c.,, 466.4 1 994 5 ,C }5 5 00;){ i,995, 40:. QC; 745. ,6,C t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4i.C) Iq* -74S. 6;' q- 7 4C}. ';iC 86 4 . 'ii ! 9983 4r . C).-)O 1;9. £so 1999 99. CH:) 1119.20) -' )' ){ ) ~~~~~~~~~4f,).{) 1.A255. SC) -: ' l 4 ':. 0(.:) 1270;>. 5C0 _z-23 4C':).0.0.; 1 465. GO-. 2r )r t ~~~~~~~~~~40,.:;: 6 ,7 2. - 'OC04 9?9. t.' 1 ;9r-.)

NET 'r-F:c5EWl ',,;LuE- A.T tE't(t5' IF;0 ...... 2...... 9'_.;2 PEtEbF I CC':-T R,AT I 0 AT }5'S'') ...... O. 4'_ INTERWNIL R:'TE CF RETrURN ...... 3. q(:) 98 -

ANNEX 6.05..,

ROAID COMFCENT

GI MAPOLAN - CAtMEUYO Costs and Benefits Stream (an 1000C) Fescs}

C 0' S T .3 YEi'lR ------BENEFITS CONSTFIJJCT MA INTEtNINCE

19s :? 3 4 77 O;¢ t,!. 00 s994 494.OCOC0 C). 199135 4fi 1 . C0 1.). (00 196I 1 4. 0) 44. 00 1*69.40 1987 44. 00 199. 5C0 18ss 44. 00 20t C. 1IC

;990 111. .. 1991 44. 0* 454. v0 1992 44. 00 454. 10 1993 44 . O.:. 51 7. C0 19q4 44. C0 3 2. 7C) 995 1 111. 00 b5: T7 44. C)0 7 .t 19?7 44.C00 720. C t 99

NET PRESENT VAiLLIE A+T 15"; * Or) F) *...... 317. 44 SENEFIT./COST PATIO iAT 151) ...... 1.14 INT-ERNAL RATE OF RETURN ...... 12. 5 _ 99 -

AR.NNEX6.05.&

RFOA'DC'.MFPENI r

M*'LINAO - BULA9OID Costs ard Benefits Stream vIin 10c0o Pesos)

CO T . ------'t '_t BENEFITS COCI"TRUCTI ON Mt I NT'ENANCE

t =8-. 529.00 0. QQt: I q84.342 4 45. 00 0.010 1 925 ;Lt14. 00 i'?26sS ";,, ;;0 49.70 1 9S r 52. t !0} 2 0 0 . 8C) -I@8 52.00C) '55. 60 I Z99 'oo;) 5 14. 1 .:; tQQl) 131 toUt) ~~~~676.30C 5 2.A 0 942.40 1 92 52. 0'I 842. 4t0) 2. 9 t 1056. 30 19 94 5. 1:277.50 i . ? '; 17 1. Oi- 1504.1C) :k 19?: 52.00 9 712. 4 0 1997 52. 0C ,, 40 1V98 52. 00 1139. 40 14s?9 Sn5.00 1 3':5. 40 2,t$t 11. 0 1573. I ) 2ic 1 52.00 1799. 26 52 . 0 : 1799.20 _ t 0 . 52. C)i t 2 114.70 4 ?9. 2004 52A_. i ,) 25 1 4. _0 2005)0 13 1.00 2897.50

NET FR:ESE1T kiALIE .AT 1 1,10:;0 P - 485.1

9ENEFIT/COST RATIO .AT A5-.! .Ž...... 90 INTEFRibIL P:ATE OF RFTURN...... 12. 90t - 100 -

AMNEX 6.05.7

Rlt-^ Ci!tMP'JMEtNT

LI SACAO - ORTEGA CostS and PvnzFitz Stream 'in tiOf;).) Poeos)

r S T S ';------BENEFITST CONSTRUCT I ON rA I NT EN`NCE

1 93t ) I _43. (IC) f"j. ''

1 `ZS2 4'2. 99. 5, . l -31. 42. of200 1t33. 60 i 924 4 2.00)) 2 62.0. SI.,ie .> C)(§,:,;; 50 i 7,36 .42.0.. 4SSi 6 I''.4_.(y-)'. 495.60 t1998 42. 0C) 679. 20 1999 42. U9 791 . 20 199?':) l: 0.(z) 75 1. - 19?1 4 .00 1121. 1I', 1992 42. 00 1121. i± L 997 4L . f:!t:; 1299.40 1994 42. t'C. 14e7. '.)' l51o!o . f )' ! s i*64.1C) 1 996 42<. CKff: 1 1 Cs)I. Of.)< 1996 42.0C) 1101.0'1 19 !9a 4`. 00 1t119. W.0 1?'9? 4:.00 1.I t' 0

NET PRESENT VALUE .T 151%. 1.000 P) ...... 776.6S BENEF IT/ COST RAT IO T t%...... INiTEFR:NL RAITE G3F RFTUR.I 1 6. 77 - 101 -

ANNEX 6.05.e

ROAD CiOMFPONENT

eALEIE - CrALTZO costs and Eenefits Stream

Y------EENEFITS NCrS_- F"ICTI ,7IiD,, ANTeNArif T E ------__------__ 19S - 46. C-*.00 I 9F.'4 70! . CsCg O . 00 t-'S1 65, .Z9 l 7k. C). (IC)

I 987 (IC) I12. 40

s - 3$ _.e.t. :fi&s) ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-2t- , ?@9 k.) Q A){L. 70 *1

1 9t'O'.74. C)Ci 32. 6() 1992 -O). OC) 22. ac, 1994 7.). 00 719~~~~~~~~~::.00 i 9?4 -. . *.! 3.-. ':)C

1995 74. 00 4t.C 1 9 l- 1 7;: .ilc 79 '. 90 1 STz7 ZO:.C)"'? 39, 9;i. t 1-'?S 7f,. i )O Zi6 . ;3C) i 599s 7c, . 00{; a. i- >) AL% 74. -t5..C) 00 2t.0t. 1 _.|s), -;t. .;4.

ZOO. 12.; -.,._ ,41'. tt. _2;: 4 .*,',t 5 20 ) 7 . ) 595.. j t

rNET F:E_ :' T 1 7., 1 ; F ...... 14..- -EQNEFPT '-T.r R:A7I;- 4-T *...... IJTER,NAL F,R.E ,jFFETUF,i ...... NE,AT 1I,'E - 102 -

POAD) C(?MPONENT

C,lJGjCA'G - ~SN S.LVESTRE CostE 3nd 4enefit Stream (in 1 Fesos)P.2'0&

t 0O ' T 'S *>-.,8------BENEF IT. CONrSTrr 'CT ION MA INTINTI4CE ------1'i 7 tt I -2. t0!-, 00 IT8 1YI 00 0. 00(

tw;IR, R. o0 C).0o) 19' e57 ' e4.0T

1 99 i 201. 00 646,.40 1 991 31 .O;!1; S9. :r:. 1c2 a .:, 19.,! i a.c,c,IP_I ;:4 7 0 L -81.00 ;3 1C'47 t. 19

81 .00 1757. 40 2 1 . u)O;C 1757. 46 L _ t .St> 2^797. 40

0 e 1a. - ' 4 4i:l -t,>s><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3 6. ii '6 t24. 4. 0 20r' 4 81., ;.- 4122. f)0 2005 2':'. 0.7% 4.0 - :

NET FF:.-EiT '.rUEi :T i F) ...... --. eENEFrT.-'.CC7 T . i7 ...... 7._ Ii4TERiNWI RF:(7T.01- iRETUFN ...... 4,rgea - 103 -

ANNEX 6.0C5.10

ROAD 'OMFPONENT

TASUK SUR - PALAGIAN Costs and Beneiits Stream (in 1000 Pesos)

C o c T 5 YEAP, ------BENEFITS CO(ThSTPUCTI ON MA I NTENIANCE

99_ . r9 ., !O O)

1984 I .s. o 00 1935 7:D. i I0 tI .1;;fi86 L . lt,s . ;(*, 197, 4 0.0j 1 4. 10

1989 40. 00 24. 40 1990 1 00.00 477. 60 1991 40). O0t 0 I2. 6 O 1992 40. t0 602. 60 1993 40. 00 762. 10 194 40.).00 92'5.10{ 1995 1 00.00 109 i1. 3C. 1';'96 40;). 00 12S_. 1 ;Z 1997 40.00v !"I: . L 1995 40. 00 14_6. Z_ 1999 40.1)00 1614. 1C) 20 ;, )w0 1; l¢:0. 1 795. 836 200 1 40. 00 S 99 1 .7Z .: _t x:),2 4 0,.,0.0 t,>l;> ' S191 ._

2 .) O)4 4) . 254. 9. O 2005 1.00 2

NET PRESENT YAL AT i 5" 1{' P) ...... 1 21. 9 BENEFIT/C'0ST RATI ...... 1.4 4 INTERkN(iL F;ATE O JFREU N 16. 75 - 104 -

ANNEX b.C5.11

Rii'AD COMPONENIT

F-1 TNF:NGDN - 'T.U'fAPvYt;J Co2ts and Bmnq+its Stream gin lOC;; F is',

C o 7 3 EiF.I:i -rl ------BENF.FITS

1 :45.' 5:. 7 se,S.6 l ;67F-44 , 2 ;? . i: 52.00 . 10

! 120.005 GO 11I 0 5. 50O ; 0)r,_. 9-7' .7¶1

1 ;I 9 ' .. 5 ' .0' 0) 1222. 50 1 ?94 00 144 1*95 .. l ui.'".) ~~~~~~144! . 4b:

t *;0:>7 .. _ . (C)1s ;'

19:l?9;. 52 .t -.t467-

Z.)Os! f...) 1. {;;S.)_ t i)Ir _'2. 0 _.') .J2.' 1 717. 40 7,(i 5,~~~~920'> 1717.4

D'!. 7,)')_...7 t) -' 14 2 i 7 . 7;.') 2305 1 _0. :002-- 0. 6C)

NET PRE=_ENT .'Y`LUE :` F I .... , .... ,,,,, .... EIF:T C TE C3 F10T5T ...... INTERNAGLR~ATE-- -- F PPTLUF:N ...... --.a - 105 -

t~~~~~~~~~F:~~~tiS'4-,i tL.. .

Ccs-Ets .-nd 9eer,^ i ts te: i r i s

. T ------B E NE TS

i- ¢''. h _ r; .IT "- 1li>!; 1il;iC _lE

172> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:I9. I-

1 ~~9 44.~~'C' 42.~~4. 70C. A4 40O 4 6 , 20 ;-a t X .:--. - : ,44.,: :, l4.4. . Ca 64 . 40 1i;?t9 . i i i '>9; 4 *:.4 . 8>i.lY '$ 2t . l14. :1,W 24-7.

9'si 44. :'oi4 V*9.9

ET PRESENT LLE (AT* \ ...... i BENEPIT.'COST2 F '[ -) (A .) ...... *. TNTEF:NAL R-TE COF RETURN ...... I ...... I, .', 5 - 106 -

ANNEX> . !5, 1

ROAO C3MPONENT

'IMFOPTANTE - T!'JN Cc-3tv and Benefits Stream : I n 1 000 Peso !

C O S T S ------~- E4E!NIEF ITS I:.OS T RL' TT OQ MAI NTENANCE

'* 00~~~~~~~~~1

4 .il! -,,l4^ s 2 o ,;0.

i?S6 to:) Z24. 0 405.90'4,)o4.J0 19?7 .. 24.C) 7F . 4:9f.) .9<-;7 2 4. -C;1 403.492. I9 2? S6. 00 5U6. 4-,0 24. cl. 559..C 1~90 1 f)r} 24. 00 . .559...... 30

1 ; 24. 00 629. 00 :i9'+^ 24. 00 700.70 I_;4 "ld 60. 00 7 74,4 ;, 1?,';5e 24.0t 790. 20 24. 00 710, .20 I ?-24.00l) 4..sh,7...... a0 199_? _4, 00 947.70 1 t9 Si,ti)...... 102.? sov,; 4. 00 I1 14.20 2001io 24.00 1114. 20 24.00) C Z-C :24. 00 1Z 7.2 20041(!.__40. 0C) 1 4_ S . C0

NET FFRESENT 'V:fALUE 1%Tlii. 1000C) P) ...... 1495j.`5 kENEFIT.'COST RATIO '.T 15:) ...... INJTERNAL PATE OF RETURN ...... 7 - 107 -

Annex6.09.1

ESTIMATEDOPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(O & M) COSTSPER HECTARE (IRRIGATIONCOMPONENT) (1986)

Repairand Maintenance------r 76.00 DepreciationExpenses ----- 100.00 Supplies,Transportation, CommunicationExpenses ------P 12.00 Miscellaneous------p 12.00 P200.00 -108 -

ANNEX 6.009.2

'';-lIOnQCNltO.;;

l.O!dUELO C.I_q kilLEINIGAkAP-YO

1,kJame oi Project

COSTS ANED *ENiEF ITS STREAM

C ' S T S fE5,R ~~~~------~------T INCREMENTAL *W:11','Es-TmENT0 & m £E1EFiTS

1977 56I?.Cr0;,> t9-S c~~~~~~504.00i\ e4.00 I a4. 1 0 19~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~79 2E.0... -iC) 12{0

l;9l 489.':;i).....oS.i\oS.1}.P 4. C.\ 1935 94^i.|\..... 3 _ 9.0 51.0 l';86 9Z4.00 175. 1.|.''= 1 rS4, I 4. OC)17, 1..._t 19?85 ?4.C\ 1 ...1. 00-.CC 1989R 94. Cl>.,.... 1751.0:>X; 1 9q7 4. 0-.i 1.7_ 1 .|o

1?89 9 + . .>CI ..... ~~~~~~~~~1 7e 1. iO0 tqzi9W 94. 00 ,!... 17'.ils

1'9;94 94.OCl C 1751.(:s':).. 1995 q4.jl~.. .. 175 i.ta' 1?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~9S 4.i;C... . 1751.;;H= 1$997 94. Of) .. 1-5.1' 1998 9 4. Cit' 5>..1 Rt. te; 1 999 S94. 00 !...1-, ..J it.\ 2000 94.f:C-.... 1751. C;t:) 200 I q24.1.C ... 1^?!.8( -2002 9?4,2f}.. ') tA 75 . t'.: 2L00) 94. 0:i) ... 1"51C.,A 5f>CS90.04... 1 715 l. 0 8S 2 C)I-) 94.':C.. . 1751 .00 2.n07 9 4.C)....t'0C ^?ff-1' }@?~~~~~~~~~~~:4 . 00f .. ; 7 ^.,^'1. 06s :' \C;9 9 ~~~~~~~~~~~~4, i!... 175 1, ':0 NC/AS*) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~94.0:C0... 175.1. i:C _C)lI4<^ .. le^ ^'.-)1-9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:4. (. t I 7c.. 7':I; A2>1 94. Cat) 1..17T 1.:

IRR AT 1S,. - a.1-I B/C RATITAO _ 2 NP)' ,iP1>> - X 9 94 - 109 -

ANNEX 6.09.3

IRR~IGATIO~N COMPiDNEENr

MADLIA - SAN ISIDRO CIS, 9OHll

Name of Pr ciect

COSTS AND 1ENEFITS STREAM (P 1 000)

C O S T S YE.AR ------INCREMENTAL INVESTMENT 0 & M PENEFITS

1?79? 642-.O0 0.0 179 2 ! 620. (0 13. 00 9.00 1t1 6029). O; 3.8.0 1 24. 00 l992s 2 . t276.00 58. 00 278.00 1 sa o'Zl68.OCi 3;36.00 1984 69. 0C) 957.00 19S5 68. 00 1571.00 1996 68.3. 00 1545. 00 1987 68.00 1545.00 1t928 6S. 00 1545.00 1989 68. 00 1545.'"0 1 9?0 68. 0C) 1545. OC0 1991 69. 00 1545.0CC) 1 '9i2 68.00 1545. 00 1t993 68. 0C) 1 545.00. 1 94 68. 00 1545. 00 1995 68e. C 1545. 00 1996 68. 1545.00 1997 69. 00 1545. 00 1998 68. 00 1545. C)0 1999 69.00DO 1545.00) _"k'JOiii;; 3. 0f) 1545. C00 2001;) 669. 15)1545. 0:r 2':~~~~~~~~~~02 ~~~~~~68. 00 1Fs4 5.00.) 2003 lba. 00 1545. r.0 _2004 68.00 1545.0 0)(-) 2005 68. 00 1545.00 2006 ;3. o'0 1545. (0) 2007 68. 0( 1545.C)00 2* jt j!,3a8. t)r; 1545.00) 200is)9 oa . ')C) 15 45. '",C) 2010 ,. *0 1545. 0') -.0 I 1 6,2. C)i) 1545. 20 12 0.0) 1545. ()0 1545.0:

IRF: AT I - 1.5) B/ C RATIO - 2. 13

riFV 'JP1000;>) - 9 7.KCi -110-

AdrINEX 6i.09. 4

' F.'GATI N !- O-MPOMIENT

l.IH,0ioi C!Rt. P(OH.CL ______talammli of PFro j c t

COS TS AND3BEN4EF ITS ST REAMi ( P I }}:

C 0 5 T S # .- ,'aF! ~~------' !iRE;1EN T,-i LNV'S'ETMENT G- .s M GMENIEF.[T'3

197S 1.-s .,, 19 79 429, i f. 4. jO;,) 19 c) 7,30. f\s 4 .0{o 42.~. O. '3 -6.8,i_. 06 24. 00 1_25. : i ?921 i 9;. '_)X) 34. i,O180.i.i I 9 '. 4':), 00: 125. 0;>') t 9a4 4C0. 0;0 t 7 t\

V:3 .tC)Q_4 e6)i3 l.'O s I:2a7~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4C.).t0 it9 ~ ¢!. 0! * 19ea 4Sl.f;&*_}1290 (W)9t,' 1 999 4#:,0l; '9t)8,,,i 1 990 4t i,s.^ 90;0a. GOf; t991 4:.s: 9t09. (:)C) ; 99_-7 40,. 00 )o 9i' . 1 C9 9 4> ,f { t> 1 ?~94 4t1,-.00 f33 - 1995 4C)Q . i 0z. 19>96 4C0. i:C 9;0 if- 1 9977 403. 0o 903?iSli 998s 40}. C)C 904 3. "D 1?9 4t. Qkt) 969>. {

20C.) 1 40.. 00. ;!. 200)f2 40 .); it!Wt t 2 C)()4 40). 0t(.). ;) _':)( )5 40.a t009:;..!

20: 12i 40}. OC)( 9{0t6.

AI.i -1 00i).\ w, l

IRk AT 157.' - 16. 97 B/C RATIO - 1.36 NPVi.F1it): 3_ 5eq. 15 - ~~~~~~~-111*

ANNEX 6.09.

IRRIEG5ATIODN1'MPOQNENT

G.Bi'V.YN CIS. BOHOL

Name a+ Project

COSTS AND BENEFITS STREAM (P100())

C Q S T S YEk ------INCREMENTAL INVESTMENT Q &4 M BENEFITS

197' 1512.0I') 0. 00 19t:30 1461.00 31.00 7.00 1921 1417.00 64.00 200.00 I9i932 1 .00) 97.00 295.00 1?9e 1Ci. 0C)f 441. 0o 1994 100.00 1631.00 1995 100.00 2310.C) 0 1926 1 00. 00; 1 0.*)C o) I -9 -7 1 0).. 00 (I . C00 1933s 1 00. 00 291.00 O 1989 1 00.00 281 i'.0)0) 1990, 1 00. 00 26 10C).00 1991 1CW).Oo) 26810. 00 1992 1 000 '2310C. 00 1993 IC)_0. 00' .23 1 0.00 1994 1 00. 21IS1 C). C) 1'795 1 00. 00 21 0. 00 t1>99t 100. 00 2t10. 00.) 1997 ±I00. 00 2 1 000 1t93 1 00. 00 221 0. 00 1999 ! ,iO.o o2 1 i). 00 260 100. 00 2 9IC3.10.00 200 1 100 00 23 1 .00 12002 1 00. 00 231 C). 00 2003 10().0 Oa71IO. 00 2004 100C.. OtO 29te10.;. Oo 2005 1 00. 00 2f3 I 0). (00 201) 6) 1 00. :)1 7 CI(.C 00 2007 1 00. 00 Gt1 . )O. 2009s 100.00 '29 I IC) 00 20C)5.20091O;(*e Z, 1 00. 00 R 1 0. Qo'IC)ot 2010 100o. 00- 2a91 I 0 . 0)t-) 201392011 1O0.001 00. 00 2310_;9IO.o0) *).0 2012 10C)0. 00 2610.I 00

IRR AT 157. - 27;.04 B/C RATIO - 1.91 NPF)V(P1000) - 9C50. 75 - 112 -

ANNEX 6.09.6

IRRI- AT L,ONtCOMPONENT

MALANlDALCpN CI .. iiALANl ______F ame of Pro jCt

CflS3TS AND BENEFITS STREAM F'100o)

r n T S 'fFE,R ------INI'CREMENTAIL hINVEST?'MENT 0 tt M FE,iEF I TS

9:-4. 00 ) - t,.

64iS 12f;).';115.03 .00 Jt2. 1J.. 00 l~~ThC~0 1773.00)

1202. 0 2741. 0(0 t°s. 1 2741 . 00 I ¢ I 20'.00"'r 2741. f00) s9c l^S;;.t;>s;:~~~~~~~~0(-741.t()C 199 ! 1 Lu.)' 2,741. 0( 1I 12f.00i:) 2741.00 1 , t12). 2741.00 £ '''4 -> 1 20!IiC'. 2741. fC)

s;~' a12C).0)0 2741.00 120.0-)0 2741.0)Q

1999 120. -! 2741.00)O

20009! 20.)00 2741 . 00 2,002200i 12120.00 C C0 '2242741.0;'01. 00

200~~~~~~~~~ 120. 00~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~27 41 .) C0 2A2004 1 20).00 274 1. 00

2005)4 12';I.'C) 2741. .o

210042t:C)O5 120N).0c)0) 7-741;t274 1. 0004ett :2007 1.0C)0 2741.00't 2009 12i0). 00 2741 . 00 2.009 I120. 0') 27 4 1 .

:o02.C)20)10It92 ii 1Q.i?120.02_>.8:!2 ,!74t.'1f0 .~474 1.:'1. t0

iz' ) 2~74 1 . k 201: Ui.u'; 2741.00

IRR AT 15% - 'S. 56 B/C RATIO - 3.62

NPV, (Fl000) - 3457.6s; -113 -

ANNEX 6.09.7

IR.RIGATI ON COMPONENIT

SUGA,YC*NG C I S, A NTI QUE

Nlame of Project

COSTS AVID BENEFITS STREAM (P1I000)

C O S T S 'EfAR ------INCFEME4TItL I Nk ESTMENT 0 & M BENEFI TS

1 79 29 C,Q7. )(:) 192O9 00 20687.2. e0B46. Oi. 1981 447. 0' )0 1390.0) 19Z-32447.00 39<4. 00 447.4. 0 0' i 984 447.00 7248.4 S. 1994 44.0 11-l0 1985 447.00 l 167 1. t'!t I997 447. I"'12127. C0 19897 447. 00) 12127.00 1998 447.0 121 27.70 0 ige 447. 0I21 1 2 7 . jt)i7 199( 447.00 i 12 127.00 1991 447. 00 I 1 1 -27. C ) 1992 447. 00 12 t _7 t;i ; 1993 4A7. 00 121 7. > i i ? t44 447. 0.i 2 17,7 . * 199_ 447. 0'i:) _ 12_7 . 1996 447. 0t 121 2-._i 1997 447. 0C0 1 27127 , 0)0 1998 447.000 1 127. 1999 447.00 12 i 27. k7tO !000 0 ) 447. 12127. 0)ii 200 1 447. 0t0i 1212 -7. i00C 2002 447.0:) : 121 727 .0 2003 t 447. GO 121 27. 00 2004 447. 00 12 127. 00 2005 447.00 1 2 127. i)0 `2CC)6 447. 00 11-7.* 200ifj7 447. *6 1.7, oc' 5, i;)8 447. 00 12127. 0 0i 2001s a9 447.0 i 1 1_7.7.7 2010 447. 00 12 t 27.0 201 1 447. 0H ) 12 27 . jj 201 447. 1 127. 00 2013 44 7.0 C0 1 27t '7. c,O

IRR AT 15-. - 44.11 B/C RATIO - 7.10 NPV (P1000) - 25609. 3 -114-

ANNEX o6.':9 . e

f RRI GAT IOl ,CO PON*ENiT

FR:fs--iGANTE C'5. 1;,1 t lQUE

; lama, (.,,+ Prc j-?ct

COSTS AND BENEF ITS STREAMs

C S T S YEAR ------IN^CREM.ENTAL I t '.'IESTMENT O ",: M r4E,'IEFI TS

1,972 S2 . 00) O;. f.:)0. t ,j-79 4_7`, 00': .t 8. Oo'* I 9°C) 372 .0:> 36.. 0) 5' 1. t) ' 'ES 1 i?, t bs'} ~~~~~~66. t 0( 478. 00z t1932 74. 00i: 7^5. t )f; t S3Z 74, t:,t 780:. ':sA: 1?94 74. 00 1717. 0'0 1 98' 74. '60 4s :C i `30 74 27t1:7 4. 00'; l 982 7 74. ,)sH`E-4. t ;C 1;'ee 74.0 :0)Z4 19S9 ,74. 0C) 2, 7 -74. t 19??Ci 74, 00 2 7\4, ,: 1991 74,¢}2'.i.;O t1992 74, ()( 2t,71_'4 . i.'; 1 99-. 74. Of'.) _-,=4. ' n 19i94 74}. (w. 2,73 4.C.; 0 1 '' 74, 00 ). Z.! 4 . 8 0t 1 996 '74 . 00: z,4.'o: 1997 74,ii;0 :--_4. 00 iog -94. ':(':> '--;47 Z 4 1999 74, tiO.2 -7%4. ()O,, 20(0': 7 4. 60C . J.r[ 200_&1 74, CA. t}__ 4. C's '210"2 74. 00 Z_ ' .4. 8. 2007, 7 4, *:t:C)71 ea 4.)C04 7 4. C0f. Z 3;ZiI. -:)'; 20i()5 74. 0)X. 2Z374. 0;0: 2006;> 74 . *:0( _2._ 4, .C)C. '2 ' 7 74, Of.!r i \4 . 0, - st-a ?4 . ,:;0:Z4 .4i .00

§.>1f>~~~~~~~~~~~'4. 0 ' = 7,) ' Z_4. -" 1 ~~~~~~~OC: ~ ~ ~~~~~74.2_Z,4. Oi.)g

_s i; _ ~~~~~74._ ,4

IRR AT 15% - 4 7. '22 EJC F:ATIO - 7.23i NF'J) (P1 tclkl) - 4aa?9.^1 - 115 -

ANNEX 6. 09.9

IF:RT rATI C-1N M.iOMEPNNT

Name oi PrrjcSt

COSTS AND BENEFITS STREAM (P1 :'0)

C Q S T S YEAR ------INCREMEN1Y.ITL INVESTMEN'T 0 '. M BENEFITS

i9et 72.. Of,) ,?. I qs:2 7S76.F 0 154. 00 2074. 00 1983; :52. 0( 2cT L . t ; rSs.34 252... 00 4:339 . t 00 t 185 2152_.CiC) 601 s7, t AI98i 6s_ Z. '0)<> 8,3&s,,,00 1937 2-52. 00 !~O2. ('0O .rs-a1 - 00 5S22. 00 1939 252. clk)f)5P. 252. 00C 5222. (00, 1991 252 s, C8) 2. 'e:2 1' 92 25r.cw) 532.C )C 199Z3 23.,0C25 0 1994 252. 0C 5 88<2 * C! 1995 252. . ,SP2; | 9qi 252. . 0 5822. (0CO 1997 2522 0C) 5 232.00 1993 52 . t !) . O S. 1999 252. 00)CI 58E2-.0 0 :000 252.00 5882. '0 2_01;2! 5 2 . C).5G, 42a.:. :;

^ !t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 252.00")0_2,5: . i)! ~ L i;vJa .. C04 .!252.00 1 f; i5823.00 1 2005 o252. 00 5P 3 . :,c,

2007 252. 5882. i ,0, 200 252. 0,)5ee2. 0

2009 --. 5p9S.* 0 :0 1. 0 -~~~:5: . 52322.00 20 12 2152.00" 53322. C) 20l13"T2 '.C )5882'.0

IRR AT iSV. - 33Z.72-. B/C _ O_A . C0 . NPV ('P1000) - 12724.24 - 116 - Annx 6.11.1 Page 1

SUMUARYOF ACCOMPLISRMENTSAS Of 1985 OF BSAANGAYHEALTH STATIONS PROVINCE OF ABRA

- No. of Patients Served:

a. Health Care Medical Care 26,401

Home Visits 3,503

b. Family Planning Service 3,445

c. Nutrition Servi,es 15,481

d. Health delivery Services

a) Birth Delivery 2,161 b) Health Education 17,946 c) Conference 351 d) Assemblies 683

e. Referrals to Hospital 280 Referrals to Hilippine Tuberculosis 190 Referrals to Main Health Center 3,603

f. Primary Health Care

a) Meetings 440 b) Assemblies 412 c) Intersectoral Activities

Referrals to MECS 87

Referrals to BAES 78

Referrals to MSSD 159

Referrals to POPCOM 244 -117 - Annex6.11.1 Page2

StI'I4RY OF ACCOMPLISHENTOF BARANGAY EEALTHSTATIONS OF 1985 pUovIUCE Of KALINGA - APAYAO

I. No. of Patients Served

A) Health care - Medical Care 38,245

Home visits 4,668

5) family Planning Services 6,806

C) Nutrition Services 23,181

D) Health delivery Services

a) Birth delivery 3,911

b) Health education 23,235

c) Conference 858

d) Assemblies 1,316

E) Referrals to hospitals 780

Referrals to Philippinestuberculosis 622

Referrals to Main health Center 6,376

F) Primary Health Car^

a. Meetings 1,022

b. Assnmblies 870

c. Intersectoral activities

Referrals to HECS 290

Referrals to BAES 222

Referrals to MSSD 1,839

Referrals to POPCOM 524

(16 Barangay Health Station) - 118 - Annex6.11.1 Page3

SUrMA1Y OF ACCOMPLISHMENTSAS OF 1985 OF BARANGAY HEALTH STATIONS PROVINCE OF AKLAN

I - No. of Patient Served:

a) Health Care - Medical Care 34,206 Home Visit 4,748 b) Family Planning Service 4,110 c) Nutrition Service 18,209 d) Health deliveryService a) Birth Delivery 2,109 b) Health education 15,953 c) Conference 472 d) Assemblies 727

e) Referrals to Hopitals 400

Referrals to PhilippineTuberculosis 332 Referrals to Main Health Center 3,372

f) Primary Health Care

a) Meeting 536 ) Assemblies 482 c) IntersectoralActivities

Referral to MECS 117 Referrals to BAES 102 Referrals to MSSD 172 Referrals to POPCOM 228 - 119 - Annex6.11.1 Page 4

Sumnaryof Accomplishmentsas of 1985 of BarangayHealth Stations Provinceof Antique

I. No. of PatientServed

a) HealthCare MedicalCare 36,323 Home Visit 5,021 b) FamilyPlanning Service 4,732 c) NutritionService 18,443 d) Healthdelivery Service

a) BirthDelivery 2,311 b) Healtheducation 16.113 c) Conference 492 d) Assemblies 785

e) Referralsto Hospitals 412 Referralsto PhilippineTuberculosis 356 ReferralsMain HealthCenter 3,582 f) PrimaryHealth CAre

a) Meeting 582 b) Assemblies 498 c) IntersectoralActivities

Referralto MECS 121 Referralto BAES 118 Referralto MSSD 189 Referralto POPCOM 232 -120- Annx 8.11.1 Page 5

SUEARY Of ACCOHLSIsUH S Of 1965 OF RAIANGAYHIALTH STATIONS PROVINCEOF CAPIZ

I. No. of Patients Served:

a. Health Care - Medical Care 26,190

Hooe Vist 3,661

b. Family planning services 5,778

c. Nutrition Services 21.319

d. Health delivery services

a) Birth delivery 3,370

b) llealtheducation 25,963

c) Conference 722

d) Assemblies 1,507

e. Referrals no Hospital 430

Referrals to PhilippinesTuberculosis 331

Referrals to t1ainHealth Center 3,995

f. Primary Health Care

a. Meetings 768

b. Assemblies 670

c. IntersectoralActivities

Referrals to MECS 191

Referrals to BAES 171

Referrals to MSSD 227

Referrals to POPCOM 332 - in - Annex 6.11.1 Page 6

SUtmIY oF ACCOWLISHUNDTSAS oI 198, OF DARANGAYWEALTH sTATIONS PiOVINCE OF JOHOL

1. No. of Patecnts Served: a) ealtch Care - medical care 27,614

Home Visits 3,165

b) Family Planning Service 5,148

c) Nutrition Services 15,430

d) Hoalth delivery services

a. Birth delivery 2,039

b. Health education 17,983

c. Conference 401

d. Assemblies 817

e) Referrals to hospital 419

Referrals to Philippine Tuberculosis 474

Referrals to Main health Center 2,548

d) Primary Health Care

a. Meetings 416

b. Assemblies 479

c. IntersectoralActivities

Referrals to MECS 170

Referrals to BARS 142

Referrals to MSSD 158

Referrals to POPCOM 289 PRIP-1PCR POST-ECONOMICEVALUATION OF PORTSCOMPONENTS (FIGURESIN THOUSAND)

SAiJOSE 0E KPEAVISIA C u L A S I I V N A 6 V 1I

IllCREIIAt IEIEfIB 1I5PE5ENIALbENEFIT INCNENII KNEII

PROJECTCOST PROJECIEDIKANCEIENIAL TkASISP. PROJEC!cost PROJECTEDINCEII[NTAS IPAhSS. PROJCTCOST PUMJETEPEICIsEENIALIn"TRS. YEAR------YOLUIE VULIRIESAVIsNS ------w i Vutu SAVINGS ------'VE m i SVI1S CAPITAL 0 1 N ion) (loft) CITAl. e t N l1w) llw.) CAilk 0 11N fi) (la)

1916 1?79 1743.00 37.0 100.00 199 9440.00 31.00 16.50 2101.00 155.00 09.20 -10.110-4276.90 915.0 31.0 0.06 I"I 1463.00 03.99 10.10 1.40 352.00 975.00 155.09 106.20 b.W0 2347.00 544.50 44.06 4.0 170.00 19112 691.0 03.91 21.1I 4.60 1012.00 155.09 104.30 4.30 1102.10 144.56 50.0 11.0044W.00 1903 113.9 24.50 B.Ox 1760.Ou 1516.v0155.89 111.4') 11.604594.00 495.0j 146.50 55.09 1S.0 &dOo.0 1914 93.99 26.22 9.72 21371.00 I.,5.U' 119.41 19.41I71.58 594.10 146.50 58.115 5.65 t194.uO 1985 83.19 29.05 1.55 2541.01 155.99 121.77 27.77 10997.71 146.50 62.91 22.97 101".50 i599 1415.u 103.08 3u.01 13.51 2972.99 155.9B 136.72 36.7214539.55 1159.04146.50 67.36 21.361204&.04 19h7 93.0N 32.11 15.61 3435.19 155.3go 146.27 41.2 10329.31 I5s.22 146.50 fl.40 32.0914U21.26 199 93,.0 34.34 11.043929.75 155.09 556.S3 5.53 22384.37 144.50 71.14 37.14 16341.75 I59 03.99 36.77 20.214458.94 155.08 1.49 7.U4 26123.27 144.50 82.54 42.54 111717.6 19S0 03.90 39.34 22.9450515.56 555J.9 119.21 IV.21 31365.90 544.50 M.32 41.32 21251.91 1991 93.93 42.19 25.k' 563.t1? 155.019 191.15 91.75 34333.51 154.50 94.50 54.50 23M.I11 5SS2 03.80 45.04 29.54Jq621.3u J55.1 205.17 105.1741649.9 144.56 101.12 61.12 268t..71 1953 93.91 49.20 31.70 6912.95 155W9 219.54 5l9.5447133.26 544.50 150.19 4.l9 340S.u6 1591 831.01 5.51 35.ul7715.55 155.83 234.90 134.9S53421.82 146.50 115.71 75.17 33337.42 995 113.11 i5.19 39.639509.31 155.01 251.35 151.355933.35 546.50 123.17 63.3136S.00 996 U.811. 59.04 42.54 9359.06 155.83 268.94 I5U.9464900.9 5146.50 132.54 92.544715i.25 1997 03.99 J3.17 46.4710269.30 15S.09 287.17 131.7714355.73 146.50 141.32 101.3244906.53 I998 93.9 O67.1 51.10 11241.10 155.9B 307.91 .76.91 92332.63 144.50 151.75 111.754958.4 5999 83.01 72.33 55.931222.16 154.50 1562.31 122.315302.3 2006

1.R. k. 159.0274t4u5 1.R. k. * 34.71352343 1.A. k. a 23.43244451 co ISRD1327' O MAWICAT.UO iovF u.'n ii- eV-11401GROPAW"01000 PHIUPPINES HwAM WSTIRIIVEAVAS U. 'I-Y RURALINFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I ,_ . PROJECTPROVINCES LaU'Ca N oiim Ywes CUNTUtALVUAYAS CAG~'A UJY COj6cTPamovIimas - MAJOfiAOD

_ftft- - EASTERN_VISA-EAWEb VISU A -AS PROVINCIALRAILWAYS UNDRIESIS mwhim AsiNGIOWOAL SO1U,1OA1#1 CB.TRALL _ _ - -- INTERNATIONAL "IDARIS

bNm be'Slambmp NwM Smaii-N_S * Ofinmvme Of l~~~~~~~~~dibe .m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~esmm*eIps

SOUTHERNTAGALOG T . NOEtTENJW MNDANAD - 4. ,,0,,, C_iNeeW . U~Z o Z N_-rZ

"=0_ swg del mom L u bs0, M No som lo10 0

C8_in SUrEn"11DNOmi | , Cw_u.,ul Cbd"", - X I _M

UCOLtsm -14- kli~~~~*nmC6ll@ OEflggP.O c Kn . ? 5p ,0.~ 4 Ma~~~.b ~OLrHw MID A ~~~~~~D_4eOboOut

SorthCobem SuftC1epn Kue

U4. Das dl2

Ei

TocIoh

SWnJon do Nc)

10- / _ 0 0 Puerto Prirco I

X ) .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a

CM I r A tA^ I bWA S g Cosloa Zosboango

\ ~~~~~~PMIIIPPINIs$

it,10tv

V'M$WS JoI@ 1., C,e0tS2o 126 VII------. 0 -