DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 May Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 May Newsletter The Lutheran larion C Lutheran Concerns Association May 2017 149 Glenview Drive, New Kensington, PA 15068-4921 Volume 9, Issue 5 The LCMS District Presi- Textual and Literary Judg- dents and their Powers ments on the Biblical Text— Pastors and congregational chairmen may have noticed What Happens to the Luther- that the 2016 Handbook of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (hereafter LCMS), containing its current Constitu- an Commitment to Scriptural tion, Bylaws, and Articles of Incorporation, is now available 1 in electronic but not in print form. 1 This is because the Inerrancy? 2016 convention did not decide how to revise Bylaws 2.14- 2.17 or how to resolve the complex issues those bylaws Below is Part 2 of Dr. John Warwick Montgomery’s opening statement at the debate on October 15, 2016, at Concordia entail. Instead, by means of Resolution 12-14 (Regarding University Chicago. Part I is posted at the LCA web site at the Right of an Accuser to Appeal when a District President www.lutheranclarion.org (January 2017 Clarion). or President of the Synod Fails to Act or Declines to Sus- pend), the convention gave those tasks to the LCMS Board Dr. Kloha’s Approach to the Biblical Texts of Directors and Council of Presidents, which are still busy We have noted that Dr. Kloha regards himself as a thor- with that work. 2 oughgoing eclectic. In the conclusion to his doctoral dis- What are the complex issues that made decisions about sertation, he writes: “The goal of this study has been real- Bylaws 2.14-2.17 so difficult for the convention? They ized: To apply the principles of thoroughgoing eclecticism have chiefly to do with the synodical expulsion process 3 to the readings of the Greek manuscripts of I Corinthians, and who is authorized to carry it out. Since 2004, cases of in order to determine how and, where possible, why the expulsion of congregations or church-workers from the syn- manuscripts were altered in the earliest period of transmis- od 4are administered by district presidents—who may ter- sion, that is, up to the fourth century.” 14 minate those cases preemptively—while cases not termi- But what does this mean in practice? The fact that thor- nated are decided by panels of two district presidents and oughgoing eclecticism privileges subjective, internal, liter- one reconciler. Expulsion cases that are appealed are de- ary criteria for the choice of biblical texts does not per se cided by panels of three district presidents. This means mean that Dr. Kloha falls into this methodological pit. We that district presidents are heavily involved in deciding all must therefore examine how Dr. Kloha does in fact make cases of restriction, suspension, and expulsion in their own his textual decisions. districts, as well as cases in our other districts. Kloha’s doctoral dissertation provides innumerable illustra- What is the problem with district presidents preemptively tions of the consequences of his acceptance of thorough- terminating some expulsion cases and deciding other cas- going eclecticism. Here are but two instances that point up es? The problem is explained by the principle known as very clearly the incompatibility of his approach with the the “separation of powers,” about which every U.S. citizen classic doctrine of biblical inerrancy—that the Bible speaks should have learned something in high school. LCMS dis- the truth in everything it teaches or touches. trict presidents, along with the synodical president, possess and assert the executive powers of the LCMS. Expulsion In his treatment of I Cor. 7:33-34, Dr. Kloha rejects the “archetypal” reading reflected in our modern translations cases are the most significant judicial powers of the LCMS. 15 Having the same persons exercise both powers results in (based on the foundational MSS Ƥ B P) on the grounds a “union of powers,” which union is an opportunity for tyran- that “the influence of the parallelism of the context, the diffi- ny. culty of several syntactical features, and the development of terminology and practice in the early church led to sever- After explaining the functions of the three powers in a al simultaneous alterations that cannot be attributed to ac- simple way, Alexander Hamilton wrote in The Federalist in cidental corruption.” 15 1788: Continued on page 4 This simple view of the matter suggests several im- portant consequences. It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the In this Issue of the Lutheran Clarion three departments of power; that it can never attack LCMS District Presidents and their Powers ...................... 1 with success either of the other two; and that all possi- Textual and Literary Judgments on the Biblical Text ........ 1 The Lutheran Clarion - Volume 9, Issue 5 – May 2017 Page 2 ble care is requisite to enable it to defend itself Prior to the 1992 revisions to the judicial system, the against their attacks. For I agree [with Montes- synod witnessed one of its beloved seminary presidents, quieu] that ‘there is no liberty, if the power of judging Robert D. Preus (1924-95; seminary president 1974-89), be not separated from the legislative and executive being stripped of office without due cause and contrary to powers.’ 5 the synod bylaws. When the independent Commission on In the present bylaws of Appeals ruled in favor of Preus in May 1992, the synodical the LCMS, not only is the president refused to support their decision. Instead Presi- judicial power the weak- “How did the LCMS dent Bohlmann set in motion a process to eliminate the est of the three powers in end up with a judi- independent judicial boards of adjudication and appeals. the synod, but the judicial cial system that con- The last sentence is too simplistic. It is better to say that power of expulsion is also tradicts one of the the complete system of adjudication and appeals was subsumed under the ex- terminated at the 1992 convention. ecutive powers in the per- fundamental princi- The impetus for this radical change is indicated in the son of the district presi- ples of democracy preface to 1992 Resolution 5-01B, where it states: “In Jan- dent. and the liberties of a uary 1990 the President of the Synod appointed a task force to study the matter of conflict resolution and to make Because of the union of free Christian peo- 11 powers in our present ple?” appropriate recommendations.” To put matters simply, system, the judicial pro- President Bohlmann was involved with the Robert Preus cess can be corrupted in case and it appeared that pastors and laymen out in the at least two ways. First, a district president may use his field were very supportive of Preus. So instead of accept- judicial powers in a “pardoning way” to preemptively termi- ing the rulings of the judicial organs of synod, Bohlmann nate cases, thereby causing those whom he pardons to got rid of the officers on those commissions by eliminating become his indebted protégés. 6 This is, perhaps, the the commissions, and then created something new with- easiest way for a district president to create a political fac- out the separation of powers so beloved by the founding tion of personal support to continue his tenure in office fathers of the United States of America. and to ease his favorite proposals through the legislative Rev. Dr. Martin R. Noland branch—i.e., the district conventions. Second, a district Pastor, Trinity Lutheran Church, Evansville, Indian president may use his judicial powers in a “punitive way” A future issue of the Clarion will continue with a description of to ensure that: a) his political rivals, b) any opponents to the new Dispute Resolution Process adopted in 1992 and the his policies, and c) other people whom he simply doesn’t resulting mischief. like—get poor treatment, and even banishment from the church, through the restriction, suspension, and expulsion ______________________________________________________ processes. 7 1 See http://www.lcms.org/handbook for a free electronic How did the LCMS end up with a judicial system that copy of the February 2017 edition of the 2016 Handbook; accessed March 3, 2017. contradicts one of the fundamental principles of democra- cy and the liberties of a free Christian people? I have ex- 2 The preface to the February 2017 edition of the 2016 plained the history of our church judicial system in a lec- Handbook explains the situation with these words: “The ture given to the Lutheran Concerns Association (LCA) 8 convention did not complete revisions to Bylaw Sections and, in revised form, to the Association of Confessing 2.14–2.17, necessitated by opinions of the Commission Evangelical Lutheran Congregations (ACELC).9 I have on Constitutional Matters having to do with who has the authority to suspend a member. Instead, by Res. 12-14, defined the basic periods in that history by the criterion of it directed the Secretary to consult with the Council of who decided judicial cases. Judicial cases were decided Presidents and develop new bylaws consonant with the by district or synodical conventions with ad hoc commit- Constitution on this point (see CCM Op. 16-2791, 16- tees from 1847 to 1941; by independent judicial boards of 2794). As the required consultation is still ongoing, the adjudication and appeal from 1941 to 1992; by Dispute adoption of these bylaw changes by the Board of Direc- Resolution Reconcilers appointed by District Board of Di- tors (under Bylaw 7.1.2) must wait. Until that time, proce- rectors, from 1992 to 2004; and by district presidents and dural guidance for Bylaw Sections 2.14–2.17 is to be Reconcilers since 2004.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 LCMS Convention Proceedings
    <INSERT "2019 JLC_Conv Proceedings Cover_E.pdf" 1> / CONVENTION PROCEEDINGS / 2019 C O N R V A E L N U T I G 67 O E N R TH The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod Tampa, FL : July 20–25, 2019 <INSERT "JFL-Proceedings book graphics-draft2.pdf" 1> 2 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 (67TH) LCMS CONVENTION CONTENTS Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Preface ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Officers and Convention Staff ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Registered Delegates and Representatives ............................................................................................................................ 11 Tabular Summary of Registrations ........................................................................................................................................ 21 Convention Floor Committees ...............................................................................................................................................23 Convention Schedule .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Observer 63:2
    Volume 63:2 April 1999 Table of Contents Professor Wilhelm Sihler: Founding Father of Lutheranism in America and First President of Concordia Theological Seminary Lewis W. Spitz Jr .........................83 Parting Company At Last: Lindbeck and McFague in Substantive Theological Dialogue Terrence Reynolds .......................97 Official and Unofficial Piety in Early Lutheranism A.G.Roeber ............................119 Theological Observer ........................144 The Historicity of Jonah ....... Douglas Mc. L. Judisch Two Significant Archival Collections ............................Lawrence R. Rast Jr. Books Received ................................159 Theological Observer A recent issue of the Lutheran Standard, the official periodical of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, makes an assertion which, considering the source, is, in itself, common enough in modern liberalism: "Jonah is not history ..." ("Since You Asked," by Norma and Burton Everist, Lutheran Standard, September 1998, page 21). A layman or laywoman, in a query addressed to the Lutheran Standard, begins with these reasonable observations: "While teaching Sunday school I was surprised to read that Jonah was thought to be a parable. I see nothing in the text that suggests it couldn't be historical." The concerned correspondent then poses the obvious question: "How is it a parable?" A. A Critical View of Jonah In the response to this query the denial of the historicity of the Book of Jonah is, in itself, scarcely surprising. Both of the Everists, after all, are shown in a photograph above the column wearing clerical collars. The "Rev. Norma Cook Everist" is identified as a professor of church and ministry in Wartburg Seminary in Dubuque (Iowa), while the "Rev. Burton L. Everist is pastor of Grace Lutheran Church in East Dubuque (Illinois).
    [Show full text]
  • Lutherans for Lent a Devotional Plan for the Season of Lent Designed to Acquaint Us with Our Lutheran Heritage, the Small Catechism, and the Four Gospels
    Lutherans for Lent A devotional plan for the season of Lent designed to acquaint us with our Lutheran heritage, the Small Catechism, and the four Gospels. Rev. Joshua V. Scheer 52 Other Notables (not exhaustive) The list of Lutherans included in this devotion are by no means the end of Lutherans for Lent Lutheranism’s contribution to history. There are many other Lutherans © 2010 by Rev. Joshua V. Scheer who could have been included in this devotion who may have actually been greater or had more influence than some that were included. Here is a list of other names (in no particular order): Nikolaus Decius J. T. Mueller August H. Francke Justus Jonas Kenneth Korby Reinhold Niebuhr This copy has been made available through a congregational license. Johann Walter Gustaf Wingren Helmut Thielecke Matthias Flacius J. A. O. Preus (II) Dietrich Bonheoffer Andres Quenstadt A.L. Barry J. Muhlhauser Timotheus Kirchner Gerhard Forde S. J. Stenerson Johann Olearius John H. C. Fritz F. A. Cramer If purchased under a congregational license, the purchasing congregation Nikolai Grundtvig Theodore Tappert F. Lochner may print copies as necessary for use in that congregation only. Paul Caspari August Crull J. A. Grabau Gisele Johnson Alfred Rehwinkel August Kavel H. A. Preus William Beck Adolf von Harnack J. A. O. Otteson J. P. Koehler Claus Harms U. V. Koren Theodore Graebner Johann Keil Adolf Hoenecke Edmund Schlink Hans Tausen Andreas Osiander Theodore Kliefoth Franz Delitzsch Albrecht Durer William Arndt Gottfried Thomasius August Pieper William Dallman Karl Ulmann Ludwig von Beethoven August Suelflow Ernst Cloeter W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theology of Due Process: the Adjudication Cases of Robert Preus in the LCMS and Rolf Preus in the ELS
    1 The Theology of Due Process: The Adjudication Cases of Robert Preus in the LCMS And Rolf Preus in the ELS Sixth Annual ACELC Free Conference Redeemer Lutheran Church Nashville, Tennessee April 26, 2016 By Pastor Rolf Preus In asking me to speak about my father’s trials in the Missouri Synod and my trial in the ELS you are not asking for an objective analysis. How could I be objective? Nothing that happened to my father had more of an impact on me personally than his being fired as president and tenured professor at Concordia Theological Seminary in 1989, suspended from the Missouri Synod for trying to get his position back, and then denied his rightful position after prevailing in the church courts. My removal from the ELS and from River Heights Lutheran Church in East Grand Forks in 2006 was also a very significant event in my life.� I am by no means impartial in regard to these events. Justice must be impartial. This is why it re- quires due process. Due process is a given among Americans. We trace it back to the Magna Carta where the king was placed under the authority of the law. Nobody is above the law. The American Revolution – a righteous cause and a just war – was fought on this principle. History, reason, culture, civil law, and natural law all teach due process. It is enshrined in the American Constitution. Both the fifth and fourteenth amendments guarantee that no one can be deprived of life, liberty, or property except by due process of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert D. Preus: a Bibliography
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 60: Number 3 JULY 1996 Dedicated to the Memory of Robert David Preus (1924-1995) A Brief Chronology of Robert Preus' Work at Concordia Theological Seminary ............................................ 162 Robert D. Preus: A Bibliography ....................... ................. 163 Robert D. Preus: A Tribute Eugene F. Klug ........................................................................ 169 i Luther: Word, Doctrine, and Confession Robert D. Preus ......................................................................... 175 A Review of J. A. 0. Preus' The Second Martin Robert D. Preus ........................................................................ 229 Chapel Sem~onon 2 Timothy 4 Winter Call Service, February 4, 1986 Robert D. Preus ......................................................................... 235 CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY ISSN 0038-8610 The CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, a continuation of The Springfielder, is a theological journal of the Lutheran Church- Missouri Synod, published for its ministerium by the faculty of Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, Indiana. Heino 0. Kadai, Editor; Douglas McC. L. Judisch, Associate Editor; Lawrence R. Rast, Jr., Assistant Editor: William C. Weinrich, Book Review Editor, Gregory J. Lockwood, Richard E. Muller, Robert D. Newton, Dean 0. Wenthe, Members of the Editorial Committee. The Faculty: James G. Bollhagen, Eugene W. Bunkowske, Lane A. Burgland, Daniel L. Gard, Douglas McC. L. Judisch, Arthur A. Just, Heino 0. Kadai,
    [Show full text]
  • The Word-Of-God Conflict in the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod in the 20Th Century
    Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Master of Theology Theses Student Theses Spring 2018 The Word-of-God Conflict in the utherL an Church Missouri Synod in the 20th Century Donn Wilson Luther Seminary Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/mth_theses Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Donn, "The Word-of-God Conflict in the utherL an Church Missouri Synod in the 20th Century" (2018). Master of Theology Theses. 10. https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/mth_theses/10 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Theology Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE WORD-OF-GOD CONFLICT IN THE LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD IN THE 20TH CENTURY by DONN WILSON A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Luther Seminary In Partial Fulfillment, of The Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF THEOLOGY THESIS ADVISER: DR. MARY JANE HAEMIG ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Mary Jane Haemig has been very helpful in providing input on the writing of my thesis and posing critical questions. Several years ago, she guided my independent study of “Lutheran Orthodoxy 1580-1675,” which was my first introduction to this material. The two trips to Wittenberg over the January terms (2014 and 2016) and course on “Luther as Pastor” were very good introductions to Luther on-site.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Doctrine-Of-Justification-In-The
    The Doctrine of Justification in the Theology of Robert Preus By Rolf Preus April 8, 1999 A Congress on the Lutheran Confessions It is a wonderful privilege for me to speak to you today on the doctrine of justification in the theology of Robert Preus. I was asked to present this paper because I know a bit about Robert Preus’ theology, specifically in regard to the doctrine of justification. Now why should that be? Well, I was his student. And that’s a fact. I remained his student long after his call to teach theology at Concordia Theological Seminary was taken away from him. And, of course, I was his student long before that call was first given to him. Most of what I know about his theology I know from listening to him. He was the best teacher I ever had. I don’t say this only as his son, but as a Lutheran pastor who learned to love Lutheran theology from him. I have never met a man who loved Lutheran theology more than he. I don’t believe he ever tired of talking theology. And I don’t believe there was a Lutheran theologian of his generation and stature who avoided theological fads and hobbyhorses as well as he. Now there is really only one effective way for a Lutheran theologian successfully to avoid the various temptations to major in minors or to substitute for the pastoral care which flows through true Evangelical Lutheran theology an academic exhibitionism designed to elevate the theologian himself rather than the gospel of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cornerstone
    The Cornerstone A PUBLICATION OF THE CONCORDIA STUDENT ASSOCIATION ADVENTIDE 2016 ​ ἐποικοδομηθέντες ἐπὶ τῷ θεμελίῳ τῶν ἀποστόλων καὶ προφητῶν, ὄντος ἀκρογωνιαίου αὐτοῦ Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ (Ephesians 2:20) Vol. XXXV no. 3 Adventide, ​AD​ 2016 Disclaimer THE CORNERSTONE is published twice quarterly during the academic year by the Concordia Theological Seminary Student Association. Editorial Policy Opinions expressed in THE CORNERSTONE, including those of the staff, reflect the view of the writer only. These opinions may or may not be in agreement with those of the Student Association, the administration, or the faculty of Concordia Theological Seminary. THE CORNERSTONE may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, without written permission from the Editor. General Editor​: Nathaniel Jensen, Sem. II Associate Editor​: David Keating, SEm. I Associate Editor​: Kyle Richardson, Sem. II ​Print shop​: Kim Hosier Next issue​: Christianity and Culture th Submission deadline​: February 10​ Cover Image​: Ephesians 2:10​—​20 in Manuscript P46. (c. AD 200) from:ĥearlybible.com Email all submissions to [email protected] ● ● The Cornerstone ​ ​ Vol. XXXV no. 3 ​ ​ 2016/17 1 From the Editor ​ ​ ​ ​ As noted in the last publication of The Cornerstone, this quarter's issue intends to ​ ​ address textual criticism and related topics. The theme was prompted by the Montgomery/Kloha debate back in October, and we hope to have addressed at least some of that controversy. Kyle Richardson begins with an overview of textual criticism in the Early Church. Next, we provide excerpts from an interview our staff had with Dr. Voelz. You may recognize his name from your introductory Greek textbook or his hermeneutics textbook, “What Does This Mean?” Perhaps you have seen him around campus now that he has moved back to Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of J.A.O. Preus' "The Second Martin"
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 60: Number 3 JULY 1996 Dedicated to the Memory of Robert David Preus (1924-1995) A Brief Chronology of Robert Preus' Work at Concordia Theological Seminary ............................................ 162 Robert D. Preus: A Bibliography ....................... ................. 163 Robert D. Preus: A Tribute Eugene F. Klug ........................................................................ 169 i Luther: Word, Doctrine, and Confession Robert D. Preus ......................................................................... 175 A Review of J. A. 0. Preus' The Second Martin Robert D. Preus ........................................................................ 229 Chapel Sem~onon 2 Timothy 4 Winter Call Service, February 4, 1986 Robert D. Preus ......................................................................... 235 CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY ISSN 0038-8610 The CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, a continuation of The Springfielder, is a theological journal of the Lutheran Church- Missouri Synod, published for its ministerium by the faculty of Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, Indiana. Heino 0. Kadai, Editor; Douglas McC. L. Judisch, Associate Editor; Lawrence R. Rast, Jr., Assistant Editor: William C. Weinrich, Book Review Editor, Gregory J. Lockwood, Richard E. Muller, Robert D. Newton, Dean 0. Wenthe, Members of the Editorial Committee. The Faculty: James G. Bollhagen, Eugene W. Bunkowske, Lane A. Burgland, Daniel L. Gard, Douglas McC. L. Judisch, Arthur A. Just, Heino 0. Kadai,
    [Show full text]
  • Seminex (Seminary in Exile) Papers 1972-2006
    Seminex (Seminary in Exile) Papers 1972-2006 Collection Number: ORG003 Accession Number: G2007.001 Edwina Landry and Roberta Brent, September 2012 Updated by Sheila Joy, May 2019 Seminary Archives A.R. Wentz Library United Lutheran Seminary Gettysburg + Philadelphia 66 Seminary Ridge Gettysburg, PA 17325 717-339-1317 CONTENTS PROVENANCE 3 HISTORY 3 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE 4 RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS AND USE 4 PROCESSING NOTE 4 SERIES DESCRIPTION AND CONTAINER LIST 5 BOX 1 5 BOX 2 8 BOX 3 16 BOX 4 20 BOX 5 26 BOX 6 26 2 SUMMARY INFORMATION Repository: Seminary Archives, A.R. Wentz Library, United Lutheran Seminary, Gettysburg, PA Creator: Seminex Date: 1972-2006 Language: English Extent: The total extent of the collection is 2.6 linear feet (6 boxes). Accruals: No further accruals are expected. Custodial History: This collection was received by Seminary Archives as a donation from Rev. Gerry Rickel in May 2007. A second accrual was received on September 19, 2011. A third accrual was received on August 23, 2019. Preferred Citation: Seminex (Seminary in Exile) Papers, 1972-2006, Seminary Archives, A.R. Wentz Library, United Lutheran Seminary, Gettysburg, PA. PROVENANCE This collection was donated to the Seminary Archives by Rev. Gerry Rickel. The papers were accumulated while the Rev. Rickel was a student at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Missouri, an institution of the Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod (LCMS), during a schism in the LCMS. HISTORY “Seminex” is an abbreviation for Concordia Seminary in Exile (later Christ Seminary-Seminex) that existed from 1974-1987 after a schism in the LCMS. Seminex was formed due to the ongoing Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversary that was dividing Protestant churches in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction In late 1958, a brash young seminarian from the Bronx, New York, named Herman Otten stood before the faculty of Concordia Seminary in St. Louis, Missouri, to answer charges that he had “violated the law of love” as expressed by Jesus in the New Testament. Earlier that year, Otten had leveled accusations of heresy against several seminarians. Later, in a secret meeting with synod president John W. Behnken, Otten charged that mem- bers of the Concordia faculty were teaching heresy, denying the veracity of cherished Bible stories, and questioning scripture’s inerrancy and infallibil- ity. Faculty members, soon confronted by Behnken with otten’s charges, were incensed. They demanded not only that Otten admit that he had sinned in making charges without first confronting the accused—a clear vio- lation of the principle of Matthew 181—but that he retract his accusations. Otten refused. And so the faculty stood in judgment: After years of study and a graduate degree, Herman Otten would not be certified by Concor- dia Seminary for service as a minister in the Lutheran church—Missouri Synod (LCMS). In effect, he was blackballed from the church. Fourteen years later, in October 1972, many of the same men who had sat in judgment of young Otten were marched, one at a time, before a simi- lar committee in St. Louis. This time, they were on trial. Each man was now forced to answer the charges first raised by Otten in 1958: Were Adam and Eve real historical persons? Was Jesus’ mother, Mary, a virgin? Is the Holy Bible infallible and inerrant?2 Within three years, all but five would be out of a job, fired after a series of political defeats, tactical errors, and self-exile.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert D. Preus ‒
    Logia a journal of lutheran theology Robert D. Preus ‒ IN M Holy Trinity 1996 volume v, number 3 ei[ ti" lalei', FREQUENTLY USED ABBREVIATIONS wJ" lovgia Qeou' AC [CA] Augsburg Confession AE Luther’s Works, American Edition logia is a journal of Lutheran theology. As such it publishes Ap Apology of the Augsburg Confession articles on exegetical, historical, systematic, and liturgical theol- BSLK Die Bekenntnisschriften der evangelisch-lutherischen Kirche ogy that promote the orthodox theology of the Evangelical Ep Epitome of the Formula of Concord Lutheran Church. We cling to God’s divinely instituted marks of FC Formula of Concord the church: the gospel, preached purely in all its articles, and the LC Large Catechism sacraments, administered according to Christ’s institution. This LW Lutheran Worship name expresses what this journal wants to be. In Greek, LOGIA SA Smalcald Articles functions either as an adjective meaning “eloquent,” “learned,” SBH Service Book and Hymnal or “cultured,” or as a plural noun meaning “divine revelations,” “words,” or “messages.” The word is found in Peter :, Acts SC Small Catechism :, and Romans :. Its compound forms include oJmologiva SD Solid Declaration of the Formula of Concord (confession), ajpologiva (defense), and ajvnalogiva (right relation- Tappert The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical ship). Each of these concepts and all of them together express the Lutheran Church. Trans. and ed. Theodore G. Tappert TDNT Theological Dictionary of the New Testament purpose and method of this journal. LOGIA considers itself a free conference in print and is committed to providing an indepen- TLH The Lutheran Hymnal dent theological forum normed by the prophetic and apostolic Tr Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions.
    [Show full text]