CPRE South East Ebulletin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

CPRE South East eBulletin. News for September 2011 1 CPRE South East eBulletin THE NPPF AT THE CONSERVATIVE CONFERENCE The Great Planning Row: Days 51 to 70 The Prime Minister the Countryside and Jobs Is the NPPF the Neutrino of Planning Campaigning? In his closing speech to the conference, David Cameron took a firm line that only 9% of land in England is built up and that We should treasure these words. “Crazy”, “madness” and the planning system is holding back economic growth: “double madness – madness compounded by imbecility”. They There’s one more thing. Our businesses need the space to come from CPRE President Bill Bryson venting his frustration grow – literally. That’s one of the reasons we’re reforming our at the draft National Planning Policy Framework in the Sunday planning system. It’s hard to blame local people for opposing Telegraph. Bill Bryson’s forthright commentary was a developments when they get none of the benefits. We’re welcome injection of lively language into a media debate that changing that. If a new manufacturing plant is built in your has at times failed to grasp the passion that people feel about area – your community keeps the business rates. If new homes planning reforms set to bring a wrecking ball to localism and get built – you keep the council tax. This is a localist plan from bulldozers to green fields. If we learn one thing from this a localist party. campaign, it should be that planning can be a populist cause. Now I know people are worried about what this means for This thought brings me to the humble neutrino. So ubiquitous conservation. Let me tell you: I love our countryside and are neutrinos in our everyday lives that millions will pass there’s nothing I would do to put it at risk. But let’s get the through your body as you read this editorial. As esoteric as this balance right. The proportion of land in England that is particle may be, it is hardly headline material. Yet a few weeks currently built up is 9 per cent. Yes, 9 per cent. There are ago, a neutrino that allegedly travelled from Geneva to Grand businesses out there desperate to expand, to hire thousands of Sasso a tad faster than the speed of light made the front pages people – but they’re stuck in the mud of our planning system. around the world. The level of excitement was such that a New Of course we’re open to constructive ideas about how to get Scientist leader claimed: “We are in a new era – of science as a this right. But to those who just oppose everything we’re doing, spectator sport”. my message is this: Take your arguments down to the job It has taken decades for scientists to reach a position where it centre. We’ve got to get Britain back to work (Full speech: stands almost shoulder to shoulder with the arts in our media. http://bit.ly/nLtkHf ). When I started to talk to scientists about communicating their Analysis by planning commentator Andrew Lainton argues science in the early 1990s, most held a view that they were the area is at least 14%, as Cameron seems to have included both misunderstood and incapable of being understood. Few Scotland and Wales and on international definitions is 19% wanted to draw people into the intense excitement that is (http://bit.ly/pj8Kla ). Research by Land Use consultants for CPRE science. So many scientists I met believed that the difficulties in 2007 showed that the visual and noise intrusion associated and obscurities of their subject matter militated against public with built up areas, power grids and communications affects engagement. 50% of England ( http://bit.ly/cprezones ). Things really began to change rapidly with the launch of National Science Week in 1995. The enthusiasm for science Transition Arrangements Promised after communication was accelerated by the discovery (or not) of “Silence of the Plans” fossils on Mars in 1996, and has barely looked back since. Last Saturday, CPRE launched its nationwide campaign on These days, Brian Cox can casually cast the gems of quantum the “Silence of the Plans”, which revealed that 48% of physics towards his audience without fear of their disinterest or planning authorities will not have Core Strategies in place by 1 accusations from colleagues that he is undermining the April next year when the NPPF comes into force. Where plans integrity of the scientific profession. are silent, absent or indeterminate, the presumption in favour of I am not trying to claim that planning will ever generate the sustainable development comes into force and the default same excitement that a humble neutrino can cause, but I am answer is “yes”. Nearly one in five of planning authorities saying it can be a populist cause. Everyone owes a debt to the (17%) are in the ‘red zone’ have not a hope of getting a local National Trust for making the NPPF row a populist crusade plan in place until sometime in 2013 or 2014, and only if they and to Bill Bryson who has uttered the most passionate words keep to time ( http://bit.ly/nppfhell ). of the campaign. There is much we can all learn from the last Previous vague hints at transition arrangements for the new three months of campaigning. The question is where we go planning regime became firm commitments at the Tory from here. How do we consolidate the unprecedented media conference. Citing CPRE research, Planning magazine reports: coverage of planning and turning that into public engagement “Speaking on separate occasions at the Tory Party conference, in planning? both junior planning minister Bob Neill and decentralisation Localism could be a greatest tool in this. Even though the minister Greg Clark said that the government will put in place visionary concept of neighbourhood plans has been weakened transitional arrangements to support councils without an up-to- by the Localism Bill and the draft NPPF, the plans could lead date local plan (£: http://bit.ly/q58Wic ). A report in Building & to a new long term engagement of communities with planning. Building Design is more detailed, saying that Clark said: “It is It will be a long haul. A YouGov poll for the National Trust clear that transition arrangements will be very important, given found that 70% of people said they were “not very likely” or that the purpose is to get councils working to a local plan. It is “not at all likely” to get involved in their neighbourhood plan not the intention of the government to end up in a position and only 4% said they were “very likely” to get involved where local authorities are in any way disadvantaged.” It also (http://bit.ly/nsju4O ). But back in the early 1990s, scientists faced reports Grant Shapps as saying: “We will ensure that there is a a similar long haul and came out on top. Can we? period of time, a transition, for local authorities to have plans Andy Boddington filed and agreed” (£: http://bit.ly/nAwVF9 ). Note on links. We have adopted the £ symbol from Twitter to CLG told Inside Housing that transition arrangements were indicate articles you will generally have to pay to view. something which was ‘out there’ and had been discussed, but were not yet in place ( http://bit.ly/pIY6p5 ). CPRE South East eBulletin. News for September 2011 2 Greg Clark Pledges Excellence and Brownfield First A Selection of Other NPPF News Planning minister Greg Clark gave a bullish speech to the Suburban nation. In the Sunday Telegraph, Bill Bryson conference (full speech: http://bit.ly/ndfTNy ). warned the Coalition against turning England into a suburban Like any family, we will always want the next generation to nation, saying: “Britain still has the most reliably beautiful have more chances than we had, not fewer. This is reason countryside of anywhere in the world. I would hate to be part we’re making reforms to our planning system. Yes, we’re going of the generation that allowed that to be lost… what you don’t to build more homes – but in the right places, and of the right want to do is to take Britain, which has worked well as a quality. We are stewards of a matchless countryside. We want predominantly urban nation, and try to create some new 21st our children – and their children – to be as proud of it as we century suburbia. That’s madness… Especially if your are. And believe me, there is no charity, no campaign, no justification is some kind of temporary boost to the economy. concerned citizen who feels more strongly about cherishing our That’s double madness – madness compounded by imbecility. countryside than we do. So of course, we’ll make use of The Government talks as if the planning system is an brownfield land before greenfield land; we’ll insist on excellent impediment to growth. I would say it stops foolish or greedy design not legotowns; and we’ll make sure that planning people being rapacious to the built environment” decisions are taken by local people who know and love where (http://tgr.ph/nppfbryson ). they live not by those regional bureaucracies or visiting Its Just Plan Crazy. CPRE Horsham and Crawley is among inspectors. The best way to protect the countryside is to make eight groups that have linked with the West Sussex County our towns and cities great places to live. And great places to Times to form the Save Our Sussex Alliance to oppose the work too. Our biggest cities are home to two thirds of our jobs, NPPF ( http://bit.ly/sussexsos ).
Recommended publications
  • Minutes of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Justice for Equitable Life Policyholders Held on 10Th November 2014 at 4.30Pm in Committee Room 17, House of Commons

    Minutes of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Justice for Equitable Life Policyholders Held on 10Th November 2014 at 4.30Pm in Committee Room 17, House of Commons

    Minutes of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Justice for Equitable Life Policyholders Held on 10th November 2014 at 4.30pm In Committee Room 17, House of Commons Present: Bob Blackman MP (co-chair), Fabian Hamilton MP (co-chair), Stephen Lloyd MP (secretary), Alistair Burt MP, Andrea Leadsom MP, Andrew George MP, Andrew Jones MP, Dame Anne Begg MP, Annette Brooke MP, Bob Neill MP, Caroline Spelman MP, Claire Perry MP, Heather Wheeler MP, Ivan Lewis MP, Jason McCartney MP, Jenny Willott MP, John Leech MP, Julian Lewis MP, Mark Field MP, Mary Glindon MP, Mary Macleod MP, Mike Hancock MP, Mike Thornton MP, Paul Uppal MP, Sir Peter Bottomley MP, Philip Hollobone MP, Rebecca Harris MP, Richard Harrington MP and Tessa Munt MP. Paul Braithwaite (EMAG), Alex Henney (EMAG) and Paul Weir (EMAG). The staff of Clive Betts MP, David Davis MP, Desmond Swayne MP, Elizabeth Truss MP, Fiona Bruce MP, Guy Opperman MP, Harriett Baldwin MP, Iain Stewart MP, John Baron MP, Michael Fallon MP and Stephen O'Brien MP • Andrew Jones (Con, Harrogate and Knaresborough) (AJ) chaired the meeting for the election of officers. All officers had indicated willingness to stand for re-election. AJ proposed the election of Bob Blackman (Con, Harrow East) (BB) and Fabian Hamilton (Lab, Leeds North East) (FH) as Co-Chairs, this was seconded by Alistair Burt (Con, North East Bedfordshire) (AB) and approved by the Group. The election of Stephen Lloyd (Lib Dem, Eastbourne) (SL) as Secretary was proposed by AJ and seconded by Dame Anne Begg (Lab, Aberdeen South) and approved by the Group.
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim

    THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim

    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
  • Open Letter to the Pm to Be Signed by Mps and Peers

    Open Letter to the Pm to Be Signed by Mps and Peers

    OPEN LETTER TO THE PM TO BE SIGNED BY MPS AND PEERS The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP Prime Minister Office of the Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London, SW1A 2AA May 2020 Dear Prime Minister Subject: OPEN LETTER FROM MPS & PEERS: COVID-19: THEATRE & THE PERFORMING ARTS SECTOR, WHAT’S NEEDED FOR SURVIVAL & RECOVERY Whilst we know you are considering how best to protect and support many areas of the economy, this letter summarises the current and future impact of COVID-19 on performing arts businesses around the UK and calls on you and your teams in DCMS, Treasury and BEIS to take action on what is needed immediately; and over the coming months to rescue the sector and allow theatre to contribute to the future success of the UK. The performing arts’ contribution to the UK: economic & social British theatre (from drama to musical theatre to opera to dance) is a world-class cultural and economic force with British theatrical productions filling cultural venues and theatres from Broadway to Beijing. From small studios to big-budget stages, theatre and the performing arts are part of the fabric of British life. Towns, villages and cities the breadth of the UK have and use theatres for more than seeing a show – they are spaces for many different groups in community to come together to learn, socialise and create. As you know, the creative industries are a motor of growth in local economies from the South East to the North West, from Yorkshire and the Humber to the West Midlands. Theatre’s workforce of 290,000 people includes 70% who are self-employed and move freely between scales and sectors.
  • Local Electricity Bill

    Local Electricity Bill

    Local Electricity Bill A B I L L TO Enable electricity generators to become local electricity suppliers; and for connected purposes. 1 Purpose The purpose of this Act is to encourage and enable the local supply of electricity. 2 Local electricity suppliers (1) An electricity generator may be a local electricity supplier. (2) In this section “electricity generator” has the same meaning as in section 6 of the Electricity Act 1989. (3) A local supplier must – (a) hold a local electricity supply licence, and (b) adhere to the conditions of that local electricity supply licence. 3 Amendment of the Electricity Act 1989 (1) The Electricity Act 1989 is amended as follows. (2) In section 6 (licences authorising supply, etc.), after subsection (1)(d), insert – “(da) a licence authorising a person to supply electricity to premises within a designated local area (“a local electricity supply licence”); (3) After section 6 insert – “6ZA Local electricity supply licences (1) Subject to it exercising its other functions under this Act the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (“the Authority”) may grant a local electricity supply licence to a person who meets local electricity supply licence conditions. (2) The Authority must set local electricity supply licence conditions. (3) The Authority must specify the designated local area for each local electricity supply licence. (4) Before making any specification under subsection (3) the Authority must consult – (a) any relevant local authority; (b) any existing local electricity suppliers; (c) any persons who have, to the knowledge of the Authority, expressed an interest in becoming local electricity suppliers; (d) any other person who, in its opinion, has an interest in that matter.
  • Saturday 6 June 2010

    Saturday 6 June 2010

    Saturday 5 June 2010 Session 2010-11 No. 2 Edition No. 1077 House of Commons Weekly Information Bulletin This bulletin includes information on the work of the House of Commons in the period 1 - 4 June May 2010 and forthcoming business for 7 - 11 June 2010 Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard .......................................................................................................... 1 • The Week Ahead .................................................................................................. 2 • Order of Oral Questions ....................................................................................... 3 Weekly Business Information • Business of the House of Commons 31 May – 4 June 2010 ................................ 4 Bulletin • Written Ministerial Statements ............................................................................. 6 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 7 – 18 June 2010 ................... 6 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 7 – 18 June 2010 .......................... 8 Editor: Mary Durkin Legislation House of Commons Public Legislation Information Office • Public Bills before Parliament 2010/11 .............................................................. 10 London • Bills – Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent ............................................ 12 SW1A 2TT • Public and General Acts 2010/11 ....................................................................... 12 www.parliament.uk • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2010/11 Session
  • EVENTS and FUNCTION BOOKING DATA, 01 AUGUST 2016 to 31

    EVENTS and FUNCTION BOOKING DATA, 01 AUGUST 2016 to 31

    EVENTS and FUNCTION BOOKING DATA, 01 AUGUST 2016 to 31 JULY 2017 Sponsor Date On Behalf Of EventName Type Venue Rt Hon Diane Abbott MP 07/10/2016 Diane Abbott Foundation, The The London Schools and Black Child Awards 2016 Reception Members' DR, Terrace Pavilion Rt Hon Diane Abbott MP 12/01/2017 Elevation Networks Trust #1000 and Beyond - Elevation Networks Reception Attlee Suite Rt Hon Diane Abbott MP 26/01/2017 Sickle Cell Society Sickle Cell Society Reception Attlee Suite Rt Hon Diane Abbott MP 15/03/2017 Centre for Kurdish Progress Centre for Kurdish Progress Newroz Reception Reception Attlee Suite Ms Debbie Abrahams MP 25/04/2017 College of Optometrists, The Parliamentary Reception on Dementia and Visual Impairment Reception Macmillan Suite Mr Nigel Adams MP 06/09/2016 APPG - Biomass APPG Biomass Summer Reception Reception Dining Room A Mr Nigel Adams MP 13/12/2016 UK Music APPG on Music Christmas Lunch Lunch Dining Room B Mr Nigel Adams MP 27/02/2017 Sky UK Protecting Intellectual Property Lunch Dining Room B The Rt Hon The Lord Addington of Addington 05/07/2017 Commons and Lords Rugby Union Club (RUFC) Commons and Lords RUFC Annual Dinner Dinner Churchill Room The Rt Hon The Lord Adebowale of Thornes 11/05/2017 Social Enterprise UK Buy Social Corporate Challenge Year Two Reception Terrace Pavilion Mr Adam Afriyie MP 23/02/2017 Academy for Chief Executives Academy for Chief Executives Annual Westminster Event Dinner Members' DR; Strangers' DR Mr Adam Afriyie MP 28/06/2017 Innovate Finance Innovate Finance Parliamentary Summer Reception
  • London's Political

    London's Political

    CONSTITUENCY MP (PARTY) MAJORITY Barking Margaret Hodge (Lab) 15,272 Battersea Jane Ellison (Con) 7,938 LONDON’S Beckenham Bob Stewart (Con) 18,471 Bermondsey & Old Southwark Neil Coyle (Lab) 4,489 Bethnal Green & Bow Rushanara Ali (Lab) 24,317 Bexleyheath & Crayford David Evennett (Con) 9,192 POLITICAL Brent Central Dawn Butler (Lab) 19,649 Brent North Barry Gardiner (Lab) 10,834 Brentford & Isleworth Ruth Cadbury (Lab) 465 Bromley & Chislehurst Bob Neill (Con) 13,564 MAP Camberwell & Peckham Harriet Harman (Lab) 25,824 Carshalton & Wallington Tom Brake (LD) 1,510 Chelsea & Fulham Greg Hands (Con) 16,022 This map shows the political control Chingford & Woodford Green Iain Duncan Smith (Con) 8,386 of the capital’s 73 parliamentary Chipping Barnet Theresa Villiers (Con) 7,656 constituencies following the 2015 Cities of London & Westminster Mark Field (Con) 9,671 General Election. On the other side is Croydon Central Gavin Barwell (Con) 165 Croydon North Steve Reed (Lab [Co-op]) 21,364 a map of the 33 London boroughs and Croydon South Chris Philp (Con) 17,410 details of the Mayor of London and Dagenham & Rainham Jon Cruddas (Lab) 4,980 London Assembly Members. Dulwich & West Norwood Helen Hayes (Lab) 16,122 Ealing Central & Acton Rupa Huq (Lab) 274 Ealing North Stephen Pound (Lab) 12,326 Ealing, Southall Virendra Sharma (Lab) 18,760 East Ham Stephen Timms (Lab) 34,252 Edmonton Kate Osamor (Lab [Co-op]) 15,419 Eltham Clive Efford (Lab) 2,693 Enfield North Joan Ryan (Lab) 1,086 Enfield, Southgate David Burrowes (Con) 4,753 Erith & Thamesmead
  • Brexit Lexicon: Update

    Brexit Lexicon: Update

    November 26, 2018 Brexit Lexicon: Update As an aid to those trying to keep track of the moving pieces, we set out below the key concepts and players in a slightly different format. This update reflects events up through November 25th, the date on which the draft Withdrawal Agreement and the draft Political Declaration were agreed at a political level. Acquis: the body of common rights and obligations that are binding on all EU member states based on EU treaties, EU legislation, ECJ case law, declarations and resolutions adopted by the EU; measures relating to the common foreign and security policy; measures relating to justice and home affairs and international agreements concluded by the EU and third countries. Alignment: the Joint Report states that “[i]n the absence of agreed solutions, the United Kingdom will maintain full alignment with those rules of the Internal Market and the Customs Union which, now or in the future, support North-South cooperation, the all-island economy and the protection of the [Good Friday Agreement].” There continues to be significant disagreement over what this means. It appears to be a unilateral commitment by the UK if there is no agreement on the future of the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland, either because any Withdrawal Agreement fails to address the issue or there is no agreement. The commitment appears to be consistent with some aspects of the single market, although it raises the prospect that the commitment would apply to the entire UK and not just to Northern Ireland; the agreement with the DUP is that in no case would alignment apply only to Northern Ireland.
  • If You, Or Someone You Know, Needs a Copy of the Agenda

    If You, Or Someone You Know, Needs a Copy of the Agenda

    MINUTES Meeting: London Assembly - Plenary Date: Wednesday 14 June 2006 Time: 10.00am Place: Chamber, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Copies of the minutes may be found at: http://www.london.gov.uk/assembly/assemmtgs/index.jsp Present: Brian Coleman (Chairman) Elizabeth Howlett Sally Hamwee (Deputy Chair) Peter Hulme Cross Tony Arbour Darren Johnson Jennette Arnold Jenny Jones Richard Barnes Joanne McCartney John Biggs Bob Neill Bob Blackman Andrew Pelling Angie Bray Geoff Pope Dee Doocey Murad Qureshi Len Duvall Valerie Shawcross Roger Evans Graham Tope Nicky Gavron Mike Tuffrey Damian Hockney City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom: 020 7983 4458 www.london.gov.uk Greater London Authority London Assembly - Plenary 14 June 2006 1. Apologies and Announcements (Item 1) 1.1 There were no apologies for absence. 1.2 The Assembly noted the death of the Rt Hon. Eric Forth, Member of Parliament for the Bromley and Chislehurst constituency in Greater London. The Chairman informed the Assembly that he had written to Mr Forth’s widow to convey the Assembly’s condolences. 1.3 The Assembly also noted the deaths of Maurice Stephenson, former Alderman of the Greater London Council who served from 1969 until 1973, and Alex MacKay, who represented the constituency of Deptford on the Greater London Council from 1981 to 1986. 1.4 The Chairman further advised that he had asked Richard Barnes AM, the Chairman of the 7 July Review Committee, and the Director of the Secretariat to convey the Assembly’s thanks for the excellent work carried out by all Members and officers involved in producing the report into the 7 July bombings.
  • London's Political Map 2008

    London's Political Map 2008

    BOROUGH POLITICAL CONTROL 1998 2002 2006 LONDON’S CONSERVATIVE 4 8 14 LABOUR 18 15 7 LIBERAL DEMOCRAT 2 3 3 THE MAYOR CHAIRMAN NO OVERALL CONTROL 8 6 8 Boris Johnson LONDON COUNCILS POLITICAL Conservative Councillor Majority: 139,772 Merrick Cockell LONDON COUNCILS ENFIELD & HARINGEY MAP 2008 Joanne McCartney CHAIRMAN Merrick Cockell Labour CHIEF EXECUTIVE John O’Brien Majority: 1,402 Here’s an updated London Political www.londoncouncils.gov.uk Map following the GLA Elections on GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY 1 May 2008. We have highlighted the 14 BARNET & CAMDEN Brian Coleman London Assembly super-constituencies Conservative Majority: 19,693 THE MAYOR Boris Johnson alongside the 33 boroughs. NORTH EAST FIRST DEPUTY MAYOR & CHIEF Hackney, Islington EXECUTIVE OF THE GLA GROUP Tim Parker and Waltham Forest Jennette Arnold CHIEF EXECUTIVE Anthony Mayer (until September 2008) Labour www.london.gov.uk Majority: 28,437 HAVERING & REDBRIDGE Roger Evans Conservative LONDON WIDE ASSEMBLY MEMBERS ENFIELD Majority: 43,025 BRENT & HARROW Michael Rye Navin Shah Labour Majority: 1,649 GARETH BACON RICHARD BARNBROOK Conservative BNP BARNET Mike Freer HARROW WALTHAM FOREST David Ashton Lab/LDem coalition HARINGEY Clyde Loakes (Lab) George Meehan REDBRIDGE ANDREW BOFF VICTORIA BORWICK Alan Weinberg Conservative Conservative HAVERING Michael White BRENT EALING & HILLINGDON LDem/Con coalition HACKNEY DEE DOOCEY NICKY GAVRON Paul Lorber (LDem) CAMDEN ISLINGTON Mayor Jules Pipe (Lab) Liberal Democrat Labour Richard Barnes LDem/Con coalition LDem minority Conservative
  • Constitution Unit Monitor 76 / November 2020

    Constitution Unit Monitor 76 / November 2020

    1 Constitution Unit Monitor 76 / November 2020 There was tolerance in the early stages of the pandemic Democratic lockdown? for quick decision-making, and partial bypassing of parliament. But that has increasingly grown thin. The England entered a new COVID-19 ‘lockdown’ just UK is one of many countries where concerns have been before Monitor went to press. The pandemic continues expressed about COVID facilitating an executive ‘power to dominate politics in the UK and globally, with a return grab’. Worldwide, experts have warned that ‘democracy, to politics-as-usual appearing distant. Both the handling human rights and the rule of law cannot be allowed to of the crisis and the government’s latest actions on become the collateral damage of the pandemic’. Most Brexit have been key factors driving serious concerns key decisions at UK level have come via secondary about the maintenance of constitutional norms in the UK. legislation, often published at short notice with little or But as this latest Monitor catalogues, the roots of those no opportunity for parliamentary scrutiny. Increasing concerns – about declining respect for conventions and protests from MPs, parliamentary committees and the deliberate or accidental erosion of ‘checks and balances’ Commons Speaker (see page 5) extracted concessions – are now spread across many fields. from ministers that parliamentary oversight would Image above: Boris Johnson putting on a mask as he leaves increase – hence the difficult vote on the new lockdown Downing Street (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) by UK Prime Minister arrangements on 4 November. A total of 34 Conservative MPs voted against the new regulations – which In this edition represents almost half of the government’s working majority – and others abstained; though the measure Brexit 3–5 Parties and politicians 14–15 passed comfortably with Labour support.
  • Open Letter to the Prime Minister and Chancellor on the Loan Charge

    Open Letter to the Prime Minister and Chancellor on the Loan Charge

    Open Letter To The Prime Minister And Chancellor On The Loan Charge July 2021 Dear Prime Minister and Chancellor, We are writing, as Parliamentarians who remain very concerned about the Loan Charge and its inevitable devastating impact on thousands of UK families. If the Government does not act to instruct HMRC to change course, then we are fearful of what the consequences will be when HMRC enforce the Loan Charge. New information has come to light that further highlights the injustice people are facing that should lead to the Government accepting that further changes are needed, both to avoid the otherwise disastrous consequences of allowing HMRC to enforce the Loan Charge and to bring a fair and just resolution to what remains a deeply controversial policy. Three very significant things have been revealed by recent Freedom of Information requests: 1. That HMRC tried and failed to find legal precedent for them being permitted to pursue individuals, rather than employers First Permanent Secretary and Chief Executive of HMRC Jim Harra has admitted (in an internal email to senior colleagues) “In recent months I have repeatedly tried to obtain legal analysis to understand the strength of our claim with very little success”. • This undermines the claim that that the Loan Charge is based on the outcome of legal cases. The reality is that the Supreme Court judgment in the Glasgow Rangers’ case in 2017, often wrongly cited as legal precedent for the Loan Charge, deemed employers to be liable for any tax deemed to be avoided. This decision did not give HMRC the right to directly pursue individual contractors.