Constitution Unit Monitor 76 / November 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Constitution Unit Monitor 76 / November 2020 1 Constitution Unit Monitor 76 / November 2020 There was tolerance in the early stages of the pandemic Democratic lockdown? for quick decision-making, and partial bypassing of parliament. But that has increasingly grown thin. The England entered a new COVID-19 ‘lockdown’ just UK is one of many countries where concerns have been before Monitor went to press. The pandemic continues expressed about COVID facilitating an executive ‘power to dominate politics in the UK and globally, with a return grab’. Worldwide, experts have warned that ‘democracy, to politics-as-usual appearing distant. Both the handling human rights and the rule of law cannot be allowed to of the crisis and the government’s latest actions on become the collateral damage of the pandemic’. Most Brexit have been key factors driving serious concerns key decisions at UK level have come via secondary about the maintenance of constitutional norms in the UK. legislation, often published at short notice with little or But as this latest Monitor catalogues, the roots of those no opportunity for parliamentary scrutiny. Increasing concerns – about declining respect for conventions and protests from MPs, parliamentary committees and the deliberate or accidental erosion of ‘checks and balances’ Commons Speaker (see page 5) extracted concessions – are now spread across many fields. from ministers that parliamentary oversight would Image above: Boris Johnson putting on a mask as he leaves increase – hence the difficult vote on the new lockdown Downing Street (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) by UK Prime Minister arrangements on 4 November. A total of 34 Conservative MPs voted against the new regulations – which In this edition represents almost half of the government’s working majority – and others abstained; though the measure Brexit 3–5 Parties and politicians 14–15 passed comfortably with Labour support. A concerted Parliament 5–8 Nations and regions 15–18 Elections, referendums and International 18–19 cross-party approach from the start might have been democratic engagement 8–11 People on the move 20 sensible, but can be uncomfortable for ministers, Executive 11–12 Constitution Unit news 21–22 particularly when accompanied by internal party dissent. Courts and the judiciary 12–14 Bulletin Board 23–25 Even COVID controversies have been somewhat eclipsed in recent weeks among UK constitutional experts by concerns about the government’s UK Internal Market Bill, which expressly empowers ministers to breach international law and set aside domestic law, whilst attempting to limit judicial oversight. The Constitution Unit is 25 this year! Click here – to find out more about how we’re celebrating on page 21. 2 | Monitor 76 | Constitution Unit | ISSN 1465–4377 As discussed throughout this issue, the bill has warned of a ‘very slippery slope’ towards ‘tyranny’. disquieted civil servants (prompting the resignation of The most recent retiree from the court, Lord Kerr, warned the head of the Government Legal Department), MPs, of ‘unbridled power’, while Lord Sumption (see page 5) former Conservative Party leaders, senior lawyers, senior suggested that the government’s exclusion of parliament religious figures, and many others. It destabilised the over COVID indicated a drift towards authoritarianism. UK–EU trade negotiations for a time, and threatened Another uncomfortable intervention came in October, chances of a US trade deal. The offending clauses when credit ratings agency Moody’s downgraded the triggered the largest defeat in the House of Lords for UK, largely on economic grounds linked to Brexit and over 20 years, and the argument continues. COVID, but also noting that the ‘quality of the UK’s These high-profile clashes were not isolated events. legislative and executive institutions has diminished in Indeed, the extent to which recent months have seen recent years’. the erosion of, or threats to erode, constitutional checks Risks of ‘democratic backsliding’ are heightened if and balances is sobering. The new Independent Review the governing party itself is quiescent. But dissent on of Administrative Law (see page 13) represents the first Johnson’s backbenches is extremely high, challenging stage in ministers’ ambitions (expressed on page 48 of government stability to a degree few would have the Conservative manifesto) to rein back judicial review. predicted after December’s landslide victory. Many The Prime Minister appointed 36 new peers, contrary senior Conservatives in both chambers (and beyond) to the constraints proposed by the Lord Speaker’s have decried the erosion of constitutional norms and Committee, and made veiled threats against the House parliamentary accountability. They include not only of Lords Appointments Commission (see page 7). Threats the chair of the backbench 1922 Committee, Graham against the Electoral Commission were more explicit Brady, but also its two vice-chairs, Cheryl Gillan and (see page 9). Retribution was swift when parliament’s Charles Walker, and the (hand-picked) chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee ignored Downing Liaison Committee, Bernard Jenkin. The principles being Street’s favoured candidate and elected the ‘wrong’ challenged run deep in the Conservative Party: with chair (see page 6), while pleas from the Commons COVID policy provoking libertarians who instinctively Procedure Committee, and senior MPs, to allow return oppose the ‘big state’, and threats to the rule of law to full participation via virtual Commons working have concerning both those on the party’s left and admirers been ignored (see page 6). Relations with the devolved of Margaret Thatcher. administrations (see page 15) and city region mayors (see The future of the constitutional reform programme set page 16) have frequently been difficult, while there have out on page 48 of the party’s December manifesto, been a string of senior departures from the civil service and particularly the Constitution, Democracy and – up to and including the Cabinet Secretary himself (see Rights Commission promised ‘in the first year’ of page 11). The challenging of conventions by the Johnson Johnson’s government, remains uncertain. Whether administration is of course not new – previously including the Commission has been delayed, abandoned, or imposition of a chair of the Liaison Committee (Monitor fragmented into smaller reviews, such as those on 75, page 6), an end to the ‘hybrid’ House of Commons administrative law and human rights, remains unclear and, most famously, an attempted parliamentary (as Unit Director Meg Russell discussed in evidence to prorogation. Further unrealised suggestions last year that the Commons Public Administration and Constitutional ministers might advise the Queen to withhold royal assent Affairs Committee in October – see page 21). Such from bills passed by parliament are explored in the Unit’s an exercise could constructively review the balance latest report, by former Commons clerk Paul Evans of powers at the heart of our constitution, but there (see page 21). are also fears (as expressed by former Conservative In October, over 800 legal figures wrote to the Prime Lord Chancellor David Gauke at a Unit seminar in early Minister and Home Secretary to demand an end to November), that the unifying objective behind these verbal assaults on human rights lawyers, implicated in reforms is to reduce constraints on central executive actual, physical, attacks (see page 12). Many senior power. Approaching 11 months into the present lawyers have expressed disquiet about the direction parliament, Johnson and his allies have experimented of travel (see page 12), sometimes in strong terms. with this model over both Brexit and COVID, and it is not Former President of the Supreme Court Lord Neuberger clear that members of his party like what they see. 3 removal of a reference to ‘intensifying’ the talks: London Brexit had wanted the negotiations to enter the phase known as the ‘tunnel’ (intense, round-the-clock discussions with no external communication until agreement is reached). Instead, lead EU negotiator Michel Barnier was EU–UK negotiations instructed only to ‘continue negotiations’ and the UK told to ‘make the necessary moves to make an agreement With less than two months to go before the end of the possible’. Boris Johnson announced the following day post-Brexit transition period, there was still no sign of a that trade negotiations were effectively over. While the trade deal between the UK and the EU as Monitor went UK said the door to an agreement remained ‘ajar’, an to press. invitation to Barnier to come to London for discussions Progress over the summer was painfully slow, with the the following week was withdrawn. Without ‘fundamental key stumbling blocks remaining the same as before: change’ by the EU there was no basis for continued ‘level playing field’ conditions, notably around state aid; negotiations. Both sides were left once again staring governance, including robust dispute resolution; and down the barrel of a ‘no deal’ outcome. fishing, particularly post-transition access to UK waters. While the potential landing zones for a final agreement became clearer, both sides increasingly dug in behind their existing lines. The UK government ratcheted up the pressure in early September. First, Boris Johnson set 15 October – the date of the European Council meeting – as the deadline for securing a deal, saying that, in the absence of agreement by then, both sides should ‘accept that and move on’. Then, in an extraordinary move that caused widespread consternation, the government published its UK Internal Market Bill (see page 4), including clauses that would enable ministers to unilaterally override key aspects of the Withdrawal Agreement, especially the Northern Ireland Protocol. Brandon Lewis, the Northern David Frost meets with Michel Barnier (CC BY-NC-ND Ireland Secretary, admitted in the Commons that the 2.0) by UK Prime Minister government was willing to breach the terms of the A compromise was found over the following days that agreement – and therefore break international law – enabled the negotiations to recommence – and intensify albeit in a ‘specific and limited way’.
Recommended publications
  • The Process of Brexit: What Comes Next?
    LONDON’S GLOBAL UNIVERSITY THE PROCESS OF BREXIT: WHAT COMES NEXT? Alan Renwick Co-published with: Working Paper January 2017 All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the UCL European Institute. © Alan Renwick (Image credit: Way out by Matt Brown; CC BY 2.0) The Process of Brexit: What Comes Next? Alan Renwick* * Dr Alan Renwick is Deputy Director of the UCL Constitution Unit. THE PROCESS OF BREXIT: WHAT COMES NEXT? DR ALAN RENWICK Executive Summary The phoney war around Brexit is almost over. The Supreme Court has ruled on Article 50. The government has responded with a bill, to which the House of Commons has given outline approval. The government has set out its negotiating objectives in a White Paper. By the end of March, if the government gets its way, we will be entering a new phase in the Brexit process. The question is: What comes next? What will the process of negotiating and agreeing Brexit terms involve? Can the government deliver on its objectives? What role might parliament play? Will the courts intervene again? Can the devolved administrations exert leverage? Is a second referendum at all likely? How will the EU approach the negotiations? This paper – so far as is possible – answers these questions. It begins with an overview of the Brexit process and then examines the roles that each of the key actors will play. The text was finalised on 2 February, shortly after publication of the government’s White Paper. Overview: Withdrawing from the EU Article 50 of the EU treaty sets out a four-step withdrawal process: the decision to withdraw; notification of that decision to the EU; negotiation of a deal; and agreement to the deal’s terms.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDREW MARR SHOW 9TH JUNE 2019 ESTHER MCVEY AM: Do You
    1 ESTHER MCVEY ANDREW MARR SHOW 9TH JUNE 2019 ESTHER MCVEY AM: Do you think, Esther McVey, that it makes a difference that you have a very different background – you didn’t go to Eton and all the rest of it – how would it feel different to have a woman of your background leading the Conservative Party? EM: Well, our party is a broad church. It always has been. It’s about meritocracy. And for me, our party’s also about social mobility. It’s about anybody can come from anywhere and achieve the highest post in the land, so long as they are prepared to work hard enough, so long as they can get a good team together and so long as you’ve got a vision that reaches out to the country. And that’s why I’m travelling the country all the time as part of a pub road show with blue collar Conservatives to really hear what people want us to do. Once we’ve delivered Brexit, what do they want after that? And they want money in schools, they want money going to police and they also, which I’ve announced today, is the public sector pay guarantee, because people want to know that they’re going to have a fair crack of the whip too. AM: But we’re not there yet. We’re not out of the EU yet. And your position on that is essentially that there’s not going to be another negotiation, they’re not really going to renegotiate, so we have to be prepared to leave at the end of October with no deal, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • ECON Thesaurus on Brexit
    STUDY Requested by the ECON Committee ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Authors: Stephanie Honnefelder, Doris Kolassa, Sophia Gernert, Roberto Silvestri Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union July 2017 EN DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Abstract This thesaurus is a collection of ECON related articles, papers and studies on the possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU. Recent literature from various sources is categorised, chronologically listed – while keeping the content of previous editions - and briefly summarised. To facilitate the use of this tool and to allow an easy access, certain documents may appear in more than one category. The thesaurus is non-exhaustive and may be updated. This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the ECON Committee. IP/A/ECON/2017-15 July 2017 PE 607.326 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. AUTHORS Stephanie HONNEFELDER Doris KOLASSA Sophia GERNERT, trainee Roberto SILVESTRI, trainee RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Stephanie HONNEFELDER Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Justice for Equitable Life Policyholders Held on 10Th November 2014 at 4.30Pm in Committee Room 17, House of Commons
    Minutes of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Justice for Equitable Life Policyholders Held on 10th November 2014 at 4.30pm In Committee Room 17, House of Commons Present: Bob Blackman MP (co-chair), Fabian Hamilton MP (co-chair), Stephen Lloyd MP (secretary), Alistair Burt MP, Andrea Leadsom MP, Andrew George MP, Andrew Jones MP, Dame Anne Begg MP, Annette Brooke MP, Bob Neill MP, Caroline Spelman MP, Claire Perry MP, Heather Wheeler MP, Ivan Lewis MP, Jason McCartney MP, Jenny Willott MP, John Leech MP, Julian Lewis MP, Mark Field MP, Mary Glindon MP, Mary Macleod MP, Mike Hancock MP, Mike Thornton MP, Paul Uppal MP, Sir Peter Bottomley MP, Philip Hollobone MP, Rebecca Harris MP, Richard Harrington MP and Tessa Munt MP. Paul Braithwaite (EMAG), Alex Henney (EMAG) and Paul Weir (EMAG). The staff of Clive Betts MP, David Davis MP, Desmond Swayne MP, Elizabeth Truss MP, Fiona Bruce MP, Guy Opperman MP, Harriett Baldwin MP, Iain Stewart MP, John Baron MP, Michael Fallon MP and Stephen O'Brien MP • Andrew Jones (Con, Harrogate and Knaresborough) (AJ) chaired the meeting for the election of officers. All officers had indicated willingness to stand for re-election. AJ proposed the election of Bob Blackman (Con, Harrow East) (BB) and Fabian Hamilton (Lab, Leeds North East) (FH) as Co-Chairs, this was seconded by Alistair Burt (Con, North East Bedfordshire) (AB) and approved by the Group. The election of Stephen Lloyd (Lib Dem, Eastbourne) (SL) as Secretary was proposed by AJ and seconded by Dame Anne Begg (Lab, Aberdeen South) and approved by the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom Internal Market Bill
    1 House of Commons Tuesday 15 September 2020 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE New Amendments handed in are marked thus Amendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance Amendments tabled since the last publication: 40 and NC5 UNITED KINGDOM INTERNAL MARKET BILL NOTE This document includes all amendments tabled to date and includes any withdrawn amendments at the end. The amendments have been arranged in accordance with the Order of the House [14 September 2020]. CLAUSES 28 TO 39; NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO PART 4; OTHER NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING GENERALLY TO THE INTERNAL MARKET FOR GOODS AND SERVICES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM Ian Blackford Drew Hendry Patrick Grady Margaret Ferrier 28 Clause 28,page20, line 31, leave out “, Scotland” Member’s explanatory statement This amendment would exempt from the operation of Part 4 (independent advice on and monitoring of UK internal market) regulatory provisions applying in Scotland which did not apply to the whole of the UK. 2 Committee of the whole House: 15 September 2020 United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, continued Ian Blackford Drew Hendry Patrick Grady Margaret Ferrier Jonathan Edwards Liz Saville Roberts Hywel Williams Ben Lake 29 Clause 29,page21, line 3, at the beginning insert “Following legislative approval from all devolved administrations,” Member’s explanatory statement This amendment would ensure that the CMA may only undertake a review following legislative approval from all devolved administrations. Edward Miliband Lucy
    [Show full text]
  • The View from the Bridge (Summer 2021)
    The view from the bridge Robin Ramsay Thanks to Nick Must (in particular) and Garrick Alder for editorial and proofreading assistance. *new* SNAFU or FUBAR? I glance at the financial pages of some of the newspapers, mainly to see the latest idiocy that has been allowed to happen. Most recently that has been the collapse of Archegos Capital, one of the many companies using borrowed capital to trade on stock market movements.1 Gambling, in other words. Archegos has gone bust, owing various banks $10 billion. So far, so rather routine. The author of a piece in the Telegraph described what Archegos’ boss Bill Hwang had been doing – his ‘trading strategy’. ‘Hwang was mostly trading through total return swaps. As derivatives go, these are pretty plain vanilla. They give investors exposure to an underlying asset without having to own it (and therefore appear on the regulatory filings that disclose the biggest holders of publicly-listed shares). The other main benefit is that swaps allow you to leverage up the bet. And here lies the crux to this tale: the sheer extent of the leverage that Hwang was running – up to 20 times on some positions, according to reports. This meant that if the shares he was betting on rose 5pc, he’d make a return of 100pc. On the flip side, if they fell 5pc, his entire stake would be wiped out. Which is more or less precisely what happened.’2 1 <https://www.ft.com/content/8062ef53-790f-4470-99d5-265335a72334> The FT report on this was honest enough to include a gambling analogy in the very first sentence, referring to Archeos as having made ‘soured bets’.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Evidence: Evidence from the Prime Minister, HC 712 Tuesday 12 January 2016
    Liaison Committee Oral evidence: Evidence from the Prime Minister, HC 712 Tuesday 12 January 2016 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 12 January 2016 Watch the meeting Members present: Mr Andrew Tyrie (Chair), Sir Paul Beresford, Mr Clive Betts, Crispin Blunt, Andrew Bridgen, Ms Harriet Harman, Meg Hillier, Huw Irranca-Davies, Dr Julian Lewis, Mr Angus Brendan MacNeil, Jesse Norman, Mr Laurence Robertson, Neil Parish, Keith Vaz, Bill Wiggin Questions 1–108 Witness: Rt Hon David Cameron MP, Prime Minister, gave evidence. Q1 Chair: Good afternoon, Prime Minister. Thank you very much for coming to give evidence to the first of the Liaison Committee’s public meetings in this Session. First of all, I want to establish that you are going to continue the practice of the last Parliament and appear three times a Session. Mr Cameron: Yes, if we all agree. I thought last time it worked quite well to have three sessions: one in this bit, one between Easter and summer, and one later in the year. This idea of picking some subjects, to be determined by you, rather than going across the piece—I am happy either way, but I think it worked okay. Q2 Chair: We have a problem for this Session, because we have a bit of a backlog. We tried to get you before Christmas but that was not possible, so we would be very grateful if you could make two more appearances this Session. Mr Cameron: Yes, that sounds right—one between Easter and summer recess, and one— Q3 Chair: I think it will be two before the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • On Parliamentary Representation)
    House of Commons Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Session 2008–09 Volume II Written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 April 2009 HC 167 -II Published on 27 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) The Conference secretariat will be able to make individual submissions available in large print or Braille on request. The Conference secretariat can be contacted on 020 7219 0654 or [email protected] On 12 November 2008 the House of Commons agreed to establish a new committee, to be chaired by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP and known as the Speaker's Conference. The Conference has been asked to: "Consider, and make recommendations for rectifying, the disparity between the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people in the House of Commons and their representation in the UK population at large". It may also agree to consider other associated matters. The Speaker's Conference has until the end of the Parliament to conduct its inquiries. Current membership Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) (Vice-Chairman) Ms Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North & Stoke Newington) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mr David Blunkett MP (Labour, Sheffield, Brightside) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Mr Ronnie Campbell MP (Labour, Blyth Valley) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) Mr Parmjit Dhanda MP (Labour, Gloucester) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Dr William McCrea MP (Democratic Unionist, South Antrim) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith & The Border) Fiona Mactaggart MP (Labour, Slough) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Jo Swinson MP (Liberal Democrat, East Dunbartonshire) Mrs Betty Williams MP (Labour, Conwy) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Conference are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Historic Section 0 What the General Election Numbers Mean - Michael Steed 0 Runners and Riders for Next Leader
    0 Liberator at 50 - special historic section 0 What the general election numbers mean - Michael Steed 0 Runners and Riders for next leader Issue 400 - April 2020 £ 4 Issue 400 April 2020 SUBSCRIBE! CONTENTS Liberator magazine is published six/seven times per year. Commentary.............................................................................................3 Subscribe for only £25 (£30 overseas) per year. Radical Bulletin .........................................................................................4..5 You can subscribe or renew online using PayPal at ALL GOOD THINGS COME TO AN END ............................................5 You’ll soon by seeing Liberator only as a free PDF, not in print. Here, the Liberator our website: www.liberator.org.uk Collective explains why, and how this will work Or send a cheque (UK banks only), payable to RUNNERS AND RIDERS .........................................................................6..7 “Liberator Publications”, together with your name Liberator offers a look at Lib Dem leadership contenders and full postal address, to: NEVER WASTE A CRISIS .......................................................................8..9 Be very afraid, even when coronavirus is over, about what the government will seize Liberator Publications the opportunity to do, says Tony Greaves Flat 1, 24 Alexandra Grove GET LIBERALISM DONE .....................................................................10..11 London N4 2LF The answers to the Liberal Democrats’ plight can all be found in the party’s
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Well, That Didn't Go to Plan. General Election
    0 Well, that didn’t go to plan. General election reflections: Simon Hughes, Nick Harvey, Liz Barker, Tony Greaves and more 0 All the presidents’ answers - Mark Pack 0 How we did Unite to Remain - Peter Dunphy Issue 399 - February 2020 £ 4 Issue 399 February 2020 SUBSCRIBE! CONTENTS Liberator magazine is published six/seven times per year. Subscribe for only £25 (£30 overseas) per year. Commentary.............................................................................................3 You can subscribe or renew online using PayPal at Radical Bulletin .........................................................................................4..7 our website: www.liberator.org.uk THE HORROR SHOW SEEN FROM OUTSIDE ..................................8..9 Professional roles meant Simon Hughes had to spend the general election campaign on Or send a cheque (UK banks only), payable to the sidelines for the first time in decades. What he saw of the Lib Dems alarmed him “Liberator Publications”, together with your name and full postal address, to: EIGHT ERRORS AND COUNTING ....................................................10..11 The Liberal Democrats got a lot wrong in the 2019 general election, many of them repeated mistakes never learnt from, says Nick Harvey Liberator Publications Flat 1, 24 Alexandra Grove LED BY DONKEYS ................................................................................12..13 London N4 2LF The general election saw the Liberal Democrats fail to find messages that resonated England with voters, and the campaign
    [Show full text]