DOCSLIB.ORG

Characteristics and Perceptions of Cost-Share Funding for Emerald Ash Borer Mitigation in Virginia Urban Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characteristics and Perceptions of Cost-Share Funding for Emerald Ash Borer Mitigation in Virginia Urban Areas Characteristics and Perceptions of Cost-share Funding for Emerald Ash Borer Mitigation in Virginia Urban Areas Peter W. Stewart Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Forestry P. Eric Wiseman, Chair John F. Munsell Scott M. Salom May 23, 2019 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: invasive species management, forest health, incentive program Copyright 2019, Peter Stewart Characteristics and Perceptions of Cost-share Funding for Emerald Ash Borer Mitigation in Virginia Urban Areas Peter W. Stewart ABSTRACT (ACADEMIC) Since most invasive forest pests first establish in urban areas, detection and containment of these pests within cities is important to the health of all forests. While the emerald ash borer (EAB) (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) has proved difficult to contain, efforts continue to mitigate the impacts of its spread. As part of those efforts, the Virginia Department of Forestry (VDOF) initiated its Emerald Ash Borer Treatment Program (EABTP) in 2018, providing financial incentives for insecticidal protection of ash trees. To better understand the role of incentives in promoting urban forest health, I conducted a study of properties, households, and practitioners involved in the program’s first year. To examine where EABTP funding helped pay for tree protection, I conducted tree inventories on 16 urban participant properties. Concurrently with tree inventory work, I conducted web and mail surveys to examine homeowner engagement in preservation of threatened trees. Finally, to investigate the role of forest practitioners involved in program implementation, I conducted web surveys of VDOF foresters and Virginia arborists. Results demonstrated that on urban participant properties—typically large and wooded—white ash (Fraxinus americana) was the dominant species. Results from homeowner surveys demonstrated broad support for personal investment in tree preservation, and the significance of attitudinal predictors towards those intentions. Results from practitioner surveys demonstrated substantial, though not unanimous, support for the program as a benefit both to clients and forests. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of future urban forest health initiatives. Characteristics and Perceptions of Cost-share Funding for Emerald Ash Borer Mitigation in Virginia Urban Areas Peter W. Stewart ABSTRACT (PUBLIC) Because most non-native forest pests arrive in cities before spreading to rural areas, detecting and containing these pests within urban forests is important to all forested areas. One non-native pest, the emerald ash borer (EAB), has proved difficult to contain, but there are ongoing efforts to limit the damage it causes as it spreads. As part of those efforts, the Virginia Department of Forestry (VDOF) began its Emerald Ash Borer Treatment Program (EABTP) in 2018, which offered partial reimbursement for the cost of protecting ash trees with insecticide. To better understand how reimbursement payments might help promote the health of urban trees, I studied the properties, households, and practitioners involved in first year of the program. To examine where EABTP funding helped pay for tree protection, I conducted inventories of all trees on 16 participating properties in urban areas. At the same time, I conducted web and mail surveys to examine how homeowners thought about urban tree preservation. Finally, I conducted web surveys of VDOF foresters and Virginia arborists, to investigate roles of these practitioners in implementing the program. Results indicated that on urban participant properties, which were typically large and wooded, white ash was the dominant species. Results from homeowner surveys demonstrated broad support for personal investment in tree preservation, and the significance of attitudes in predicting that support. Results from practitioner surveys demonstrated substantial, though not unanimous, support for the program as a benefit both to clients and forests. These findings are discussed in the context of future urban forest health programs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to Dr. Eric Wiseman for guidance and encouragement throughout my entire graduate program. Thanks also to committee members Dr. Scott Salom and Dr. John Munsell for providing important feedback and support throughout the process of study design, survey research, and analysis. A big thanks to Lori Chamberlin, Meredith Bean, and all at Virginia Department of Forestry’s Forest Health and Urban & Community Forestry divisions for collaboration and distribution of survey requests. I’m extremely grateful for the help of John Peterson at Virginia Tech in conducting tree inventories on properties around the state, in mostly frigid conditions. Thanks also to Sarah Gugercin, Tiffany Brown, and David Reep at Virginia Tech for the time and expertise they contributed towards survey layout and mailing. Additionally, I’m grateful for the help of many of my graduate student colleagues with technical aspects of geographic and survey data analysis. I also greatly appreciate the contributions of time and personal input from all homeowners, arborists, and foresters who participated in surveys or property inventories. Finally, I’m grateful for the constant support my wife Laura has provided during this project. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... x LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Research Background ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Research Objectives .............................................................................................. 2 CHAPTER 2 – LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................. 4 2.1 Biological Invasions in North America ................................................................. 4 2.2 Historical Impacts of Invasive Forest Pests and Pathogens .................................. 5 2.3 Arrival, Spread, and Impacts of the Emerald Ash Borer ....................................... 8 2.4 Biology and Control of EAB ............................................................................... 12 2.4.1 Strategies for Municipal EAB Management ............................................... 14 2.4.2 State-level EAB Management Cost-share Programs .................................. 15 2.5 Historical and Current Context of Incentive Programs ....................................... 16 2.6 Analysis of Incentive Programs and Landowner Participation ........................... 18 2.7 Summary of Literature ........................................................................................ 22 CHAPTER 3 – SITE CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN EABTP PARTICIPANT PROPERTIES ............................................................................................ 24 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 24 3.2 Methods ............................................................................................................... 25 3.2.1 Definition of Target Population ................................................................... 25 3.2.2 Selection of Sites.......................................................................................... 25 3.2.3 Data Collection: Participant Properties ........................................................ 26 3.2.4 Data Processing: i-Tree Eco......................................................................... 25 3.2.5 Data Compilation: Urban Forest Assessments .......................................... 259 3.2.6 Data Analysis ............................................................................................... 30 3.3 Results ................................................................................................................. 31 3.3.1 Data Validation ............................................................................................ 31 3.3.2 Cluster Analysis of Participant Properties ................................................... 32 3.3.3 Comparison of Species Composition Among Sites ..................................... 35 v 3.3.4 Comparison of Species Composition Between Sites and Surrounding Urban Forests.. ...................................................................................................... 36 3.3.5 Linear Models of Species Composition ....................................................... 39 3.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 41 CHAPTER 4 – HOMEOWNER ENGAGEMENT IN LANDSCAPE TREE PRESERVATION ........................................................................................................ 43 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 43 4.2 Methods ............................................................................................................... 45 4.2.1 Construction of Survey Sampling Frames .................................................. 45 4.2.2 Construction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Documents of the 223 Annual Convention
    Documents of the 223rd Annual Convention Members of Convention should print or download this packet and bring it with them to Annual Convention on November 4, 2017 at Christ Church, 5000 Pouncey Tract Road, Glen Allen 23059. Nominations, resolutions and amendments not included in this packet must be submitted from the floor of Convention. Resolutions and amendments must be accepted by a two-thirds vote of Convention members, and the submitter must bring 600 copies of the document. If needed, a supplemental packet of information will be available by Wednesday, November 1, with any additional information that is submitted late. The Convention webpage will be updated as information is received. Contents: • Draft Agenda (subject to change) 1 • Christ Church Campus Map 2 • Rules of Order 4 • Nominations o Standing Committee 10 o Diocesan Missionary Society 18 o Virginia Diocesan Homes 19 • Resolutions 23 • Budget 59 • Reports 65 “To You All Hearts Are Open” 223rd Annual Convention of the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia Christ Church, Glen Allen, VA Saturday, November 4, 2017 DRAFT AGENDA 7:30 a.m. Registration Opens (Garage/GCC) 8:00 Resolutions Open Hearing (Worship Building) 9:30 Call to Order (Worship Building) Invocation Adoption of Rules of Order Adoption of Program Appointment of Parliamentarian, Secretary and Assistant Secretaries Appointment of Committees of Convention Report of Credentials Committee Determination of Quorum Call for Additional Resolutions, Canonical Amendments Ballot for Standing Committee Introduction of New Clergy
    [Show full text]
  • BALLSTON Metro Station Area Demographics
    N . BU C H N N . AN . ST VER AN . N. U T AR S M 4TH ST 1 O GTON T WASHIN . N ST T N . N N ST . ST . BLVD. TH 3 Q 1 . U I N N BLVD. ST C . ON N GT N SHIN WA N T D . Y N AF . A E A 37) U . A. 2 VER E (V ST B YL H F T C N T 11 N E (V AH O . O S R . O . N. D T - ST L R H A. N T ST . I 6 R . N. 11 N PL U D O ST W 6 . M 1 ST I N Metro Station Area Demographics ST N D BALLSTON . D BU . 2 N IE E ST R 0 . TH S T 2 AN 1 . ) . T. N A S ST T D . O . N. S H ST. N N VER 11T H ST R L T . 1 PH 2010 Census (Summary File 1) 1 E W A T M K ST N E O I F . I N E T L D S T . A. 237) N. AX DR. (V . F ST N IR H ST FA 0T . 1 R . N. D B ST RFAX U 9T H FAI C . N . N H ST N . The Ballston Metro Station Area (MSA) is situated on the Orange Metrorial line at the western end of the A H W 9T . N N BU . AKEF T A W O N N R O N . L S O ABI I N ST I T N D EL .
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You to Everyone Joining Us on the Blacksburg Campus Or Remotely Via the Live Stream from the National Capital Region, Roanoke, and Beyond
    STATE OF THE COLLEGE MAY 02, 2018 Assembly Hall, Inn at Virginia Tech Julia M. Ross, Paul and Dorothea Torgersen Dean of Engineering Good morning! Thank you to everyone joining us on the Blacksburg campus or remotely via the live stream from the National Capital Region, Roanoke, and beyond. I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to be here today. Welcome! Since joining the Virginia Tech community, I have spent a great deal of time getting to know university leadership, department heads, faculty, staff, students, alumni, and industry partners. It was crucial for the success of the college, that I first and foremost, listen. To LEARN about Virginia Tech culture and to LISTEN and understand what makes this institution and college unique. Thank you -- for spending that time with me and putting up with all my questions. Thank you -- for the warm Hokie welcome and for having difficult and important conversations about our future. Thank you -- for being transparent, open, and honest. Thank you -- for your tireless dedication that is critical to the success of the college and the university. I am humbled and honored to lead this extraordinary college forward. During our time together this morning, I’d like to reflect back to you what I have heard and to share a few of the many great things we have to celebrate in the college. I will also share 1 with you my thoughts on a collective vision, a synthesis of the many conversations I’ve had – of where we can go together and how we can get there.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Peninsula Demographic Study
    The Changing Demographics of Virginia’s Middle Peninsula FOR: Mr. Lewis Lawrence Executive Director, Middle Peninsula Planning District Commission PREPARED BY: Ashley Johnson, Rob Marty, Rebekah Vaughan, and Darice Xue December 16, 2015 Policy Research Seminar Report William & Mary Public Policy Program Acknowledgements—We thank Sarah Stafford and Elaine McBeth for their mentorship in the research process, Curt Commander for his excellent research assistance, and our colleagues in the Policy Research Seminar for their invaluable comments and suggestions for this project. Report Authors (Left to Right) Rebekah Vaughan, M.P.P. ‘16 Ashley Johnson, J.D./M.P.P. ‘16 Rob Marty, M.S./M.P.P. ‘17 Darice Xue, B.A./M.P.P. ‘16 William & Mary Public Policy | PRS Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. i Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ii 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………........................................... 1 2. Previous Studies………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 3. Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 3.1 Census Data……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3.2 Surveys……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 3.3 Twin Town Comparisons……………………………………………………………………………………. 7 4 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 4.1 Census Data……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 4.2 Surveys……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 4.3 Twin Town Comparisons …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 5 Policy Implications……………………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Lupton GT D 2021.Pdf (2.869Mb)
    Self-Identified Professional Development Needs of Virginia Career and Technical Education Teachers Gary Taylor Lupton Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Curriculum and Instruction William T. Price Thomas O. Williams Joseph S. Mukuni Bonnie S. Billingsley January 28, 2021 Blacksburg, Virginia Key words: Career and Technical Education, Professional Development, CTE Teacher Self-Identified Professional Development Needs of Virginia Career and Technical Education Teachers Gary Taylor Lupton ABSTRACT Improving teacher quality is an effective strategy for improving student outcomes. For professional development to be effective at changing student practice and improving student outcomes the professional development topic needs to be relevant to the work of the teacher. This study surveys Virginia CTE teachers to identify their self-identified, most needed professional development topics. Virginia CTE teachers were asked to rate 136 separate teaching competencies based on each competency’s importance to the teacher’s practice and the teacher’s ability to implement the competency. A quantitative research design was used to conduct this study. The Borich Needs Assessment Model was utilized to calculate a Mean Weighted Discrepancy Score (MWDS) for each competency. Competencies were with the largest MWDS were identified as those most needed for teacher professional development. Respondent data was disaggregated by gender, ethnicity, intention to remain in the teaching profession, CTE content area, years of experience, school division, and pre-service training in order to identify differences in professional development topic rankings for on each demographic area. Mann-Whitney U testing and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test by ranks were used.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Demographics of Virginia's Middle Peninsula
    The Changing Demographics of Virginia’s Middle Peninsula FOR: Mr. Lewis Lawrence Executive Director, Middle Peninsula Planning District Commission PREPARED BY: Ashley Johnson, Rob Marty, Rebekah Vaughan, and Darice Xue December 16, 2015 Policy Research Seminar Report William & Mary Public Policy Program Acknowledgements—We thank Sarah Stafford and Elaine McBeth for their mentorship in the research process, Curt Commander for his excellent research assistance, and our colleagues in the Policy Research Seminar for their invaluable comments and suggestions for this project. Report Authors (Left to Right) Rebekah Vaughan, M.P.P. ‘16 Ashley Johnson, J.D./M.P.P. ‘16 Rob Marty, M.S./M.P.P. ‘17 Darice Xue, B.A./M.P.P. ‘16 William & Mary Public Policy | PRS Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. i Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ii 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………........................................... 1 2. Previous Studies………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 3. Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 3.1 Census Data……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3.2 Surveys……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 3.3 Twin Town Comparisons……………………………………………………………………………………. 7 4 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 4.1 Census Data……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 4.2 Surveys……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 4.3 Twin Town Comparisons …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 5 Policy Implications……………………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • K Technical Reference
    Marcia Invernizzi • Connie Juel • Linda Swank • Joanne Meier University of Virginia • Curry School of Education K Technical Reference For questions about PALS-K, please contact: Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening (PALS) 1-888-UVA-PALS (1-888-882-7257) or (434) 982-2780 Fax: (434) 982-2793 e-mail address: [email protected] • Web site: http://pals.virginia.edu ©2004–2015 by Te Rector and Te Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia. All Rights Reserved. Graphic Design: Branner Graphic Design Printed in the United States of America K Technical Reference Tis document is a supplement to the PALS-K Administration & Scoring Guide. Marcia Invernizzi • Connie Juel • Linda Swank • Joanne Meier Virginia State Department of Education University of Virginia • Curry School of Education Acknowledgments Development of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening (PALS-K) has been supported by the Virginia Department of Education through Virginia’s Early Intervention Reading Initiative. Without the support provided by the Department, the test devel- opment activity required for this assessment would not be possible. Te PALS Ofce would like to thank Dr. Randall Robey, Dr. Timothy Landrum, and Dr. Tonya Moon at the University of Virginia for their contribu- tions to the technical adequacy of PALS-K. Tanks go also to division representatives, principals, and teachers throughout Virginia who have participated in pilots. Tanks to their participation, the PALS ofce is able to ensure that classroom teachers have a literacy screening tool with good evidence of reli- ability and validity. We also wish to thank several generations of graduate students from the McGufey Reading Center who have contributed to the devel- opment of PALS-K tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Hepatitis C Epidemiologic Profile 2016
    VIRGINIA HEPATITIS C 2016 EPIDEMIOLOGIC PROFILE Virginia Hepatitis C Epidemiologic Profile (2016) This project was funded in part through the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) grant Building State/Territorial Health Department Capacity to Develop & Utilize Viral Hepatitis Epidemiologic Profiles. Suggested citation: Virginia Hepatitis C Epidemiologic Profile (2016). Virginia Department of Health, Office of Epidemiology. Available online at: http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/disease-prevention/disease-prevention/viral- hepatitis/hepatitis-data-statistics/ 2016 VIRGINIA HEPATITIS C EPIDEMIOLOGIC PROFILE TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION Executive summary 1 Abbreviations used 2 Background 3 SECTION 1: DEMOGRAPHICS Demographics of Virginia 6 SECTION 2: SURVEILLANCE Hepatitis C Surveillance in Virginia 8 SECTION 3: SPECIAL POPULATIONS AND RISK FACTORS Baby boomers and people under 30 years of age 13 Opioids and injection drug use 15 Appalachian region 20 • Spotlight on Southwest Virginia 23 Incarcerated individuals 26 HIV co-infection 28 SECTION 4: TESTING AND TREATMENT Testing 31 Treatment 32 SECTION 5: MORBIDITY Hepatocellular carcinoma 34 Liver transplantation 36 Hospitalization 38 SECTION 6: MORTALITY Deaths 40 CLOSING Next steps 42 Datasets analyzed 44 Acknowledgments 45 Map of health planning geography 46 2016 VIRGINIA HEPATITIS C EPIDEMIOLOGIC PROFILE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hepatitis C was the fourth most common care. Data on liver transplantation and liver cancer reportable disease among Virginians in 2015, and as well as recent trends in treatment of hepatitis C the rate of reported cases is rising. The Virginia across Virginia are included in this profile. Hepatitis C Epidemiologic Profile was developed to assess the burden of hepatitis C in Virginia, provide The primary risk factor for newly acquired hepatitis a platform to present this complex subject, and use C virus (HCV) infection is injection drug use (IDU) the findings to inform public health planning, (Zibbell, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Education Agenda Item
    VIRGINIA BOARD OF EDUCATION 2009 ANNUAL REPORT 2009 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE CONDITION AND NEEDS OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN VIRGINIA PRESENTED TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY NOVEMBER 17, 2009 VIRGINIA BOARD OF EDUCATION Members of the Board of Education as of July 1, 2009 Dr. Virginia L. McLaughlin Dr. Mark E. Emblidge College of William and Mary President P.O. Box 8795 413 Stuart Circle Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795 Suite 303 Richmond, VA 23220 Mr. Kelvin L. Moore 616 Court Street Dr. Thomas M. Brewster Lynchburg, VA 24504 172 Angel Lane Falls Mills, VA 24613 Mrs. Eleanor B. Saslaw 5304 Woodland Estates Way Mrs. Isis M. Castro Springfield, VA 22151 2404 Culpeper Road Alexandria, VA 22308 Dr. Ella P. Ward Vice President 1517 Pine Grove Lane Mr. David L. Johnson Chesapeake, VA 23321 3103 B Stony Point Road Richmond, VA 23235 Superintendent of Public Instruction Mr. K. Rob Krupicka Dr. Patricia I. Wright City Hall Office Virginia Department of Education 301 King Street Alexandria, VA 22314 2 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF EDUCATION P.O. BOX 2120 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23218-2120 November 17, 2009 The Honorable Timothy M. Kaine, Governor Members of the Virginia General Assembly Commonwealth of Virginia Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Governor Kaine and Members of the Virginia General Assembly: On behalf of the Board of Education, I am pleased to transmit the 2009 Annual Report on the Condition and Needs of Public Schools in Virginia, submitted pursuant to § 22.1-18 of the Code of Virginia. The report contains information on Virginia’s public schools, including an analysis of student academic performance and a report on the school divisions’ compliance with the requirements of the Standards of Quality and the Standards of Accreditation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gov Baliles Remarks at Joint Meeting
    EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AND DISTRIBUTION UNTIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 at 3:30 pm. Remarks of The Honorable Gerald L. Baliles to the State Council of Higher Education and Presidents of Virginia’s Public Colleges and Universities Cabell Library Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia September 17, 2018 RESTATING THE CASE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION— DEFINING NEW ROLES FOR SCHEV AND PRESIDENTS Mr. Chairman, thank you for the very kind introduction, and thanks for the invitation. Members of the State Council of Higher Education, Presidents of Virginia’s public colleges and universities, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentleman, I am pleased to be a part of your two day session on matters of higher education. It’s good to be back at Virginia Commonwealth University. From my observations, VCU has been the singular dynamic force in reshaping much of the Capital City during the past 30 years. My wife, Robin, and I look forward to seeing VCU’s new and consequential Institute of Contemporary Art after my three hour presentation; so let’s get started. SCHEV plays an essential role in the strategic direction and intellectual health of higher education in the Commonwealth — and, from what I can see, it’s in good hands. Let me go further than that. SCHEV’s composition of members — and its Director and staff — is as strong today as any I’ve observed since the SCHEV era of Gordon Davies, its long-time nationally acclaimed Director from the late ‘70s through the late-‘90s. And, frankly, Virginia needs you to be strong and capable. I will get to that part.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care Needs Assessment
    Primary Care Needs Assessment Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Challenges ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Virginia’s Aging Population ................................................................................................................... 4 A Shifting Healthcare Landscape........................................................................................................... 7 Challenging Policy Environment ........................................................................................................... 9 The Virginia Statewide Needs Assessment ............................................................................................... 9 Identifying Vulnerable Populations ............................................................................................................ 10 Stakeholder Input ................................................................................................................................... 10 Current Shortage Areas ........................................................................................................................... 12 Chronic Shortage Areas ........................................................................................................................... 18 Identifying vulnerable populations
    [Show full text]
  • VIRGINIA SQUARE Metro Station Area Demographics
    N . N E L N N . S K . A O KI L N S N I R S N A K S T S C N W S . T O T I O . V . Y L O ST N WASHINGTON D . N R WASHINGTON BLVD. R D . LVD. N B D AX Q . F N . IR U M A . F I N N O E C N L Y S R Metro Station Area Demographics ST O O VIRGINIA SQUARE N . E . ST. N S 11TH T S KEN . T . N 2010 Census (Summary File 1) M . E IV N ST O . N R R KA D . E . N J . N D AC . N . ST SA L ST ST V H I . L K 0T N S . 1 SO C B ST X O N N A N F . L N O . IR A S I F IL VY W 8TH RD. N. N The Virginia Square Metro Station Area (MSA) is situated on the Orange Metrorail line between the ST . KE . N N . M L I Clarendon and Ballston Stations. In the mid-1900s, Virginia Square served as an important commercial O N R C E . O T. N. N L 9 H S H ST S T N 8T T . district for the County. More recently, Virginia Square has become the cultural and educational center with- ST . N in the Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor, with developments such as the Virginia Square campus of George Mason ST H WILSON BLVD. 7T T University, Arlington Central Library, and the Arlington Arts Center.
    [Show full text]