Adventist Review General Organ of the Seventh-day Adventist Church September 17, 1981
Ellen White's use of sources Page 3 Jumping for joy Page 11 `We'll have to get into the book" Page 12 `This work is of God, or it is not" Page 13
The school is simple and rustic, with few financial resources, but students at the new Adventist agriculture- industrial school in Brazil are happy for a place in which to prepare for service. See page 15. THIS WEEK Adventist Review
When we planned this issue we had no idea that a story of irk timeliness and importance to the ‘411, world church would break, pre- empting seven pages (3-7, 13, 14) 131st Year of Continuous Publication of regular material. Many church EDITOR members have been concerned Kenneth H. Wood with charges of plagiarism made ASSOCIATE EDITORS against Ellen White, charges that Leo R. Van Dolson, William G. Johnsson have been publicized in newspa- ASSISTANT EDITORS pers around the United States. Jocelyn R. Fay, Aileen Andres Sox Warren L. Johns, chief counsel of ASSISTANT TO THE EDITOR the General Conference Office of Eugene F. Durand General Counsel, decided to put ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY the matter into the hands of an Corinne Russ attorney who specializes in such EDITORIAL SECRETARIES cases. The story that begins on the Chitra Bamabas, Celia Singer opposite page is the result. and needed. Please relay a belated the time was a student at Hawai- ART A recent letter from J. H. Director, Byron Steele note of appreciation to Author ian Mission Academy, Honolulu, Designer, G. W. Busch Horning, of Healdsburg, Califor- Lilya Wagner. Hawaii. He received a first-place CONSULTING EDITORS nia, shed some light on a photo "You credit the picture of the award of $300." Neal C. Wilson, Charles E. Bradford, L. L. credit we gave for a picture used kitten that heads the story to Art and photo credits: Pp. 5, Bock, L. L. Butler, Alf Lohne, Enoch Oliveira, G. Ralph Thompson, Max Torkel- in the December 25, 1980, issue Kodak High School Photo 6, Howard Krenrich; p. 10, sen, Francis W. Wemick and republished with this column. Awards, which is correct. The Review photo; all other photos, SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS " 'Caretakers of His Creatures' picture was taken and submitted courtesy of the respective R. R. Figuhr, Robert H. Pierson, George W. was timely, thought-provoking, to Kodak by Melvin Ing, who at authors. Brown, G. J. Christo, W. T. Clark, Bekele Heye, R. J. Kloosterhuis, Edwin Ludescher, Kenneth J. Mittleider, K. S. Parmenter, W. R. L. Scragg, Joao Wolff EDITORS, NORTH AMERICAN LEITERS UNION EDITIONS Columbia, Ernest N. Wendth Southwestern, Richard W. Bendall
Letters submitted for publication should AFRO-MIDEAST EDITION contribute ideas and comments on articles or Why call this a witness? The than the controls suggests the Editor, D. Jean Thomas material printed in the ADVENTIST REVIEW. main concern seems to be to make possible action of another carcin- They should be brief, not exceeding 250 INTER-AMERICAN EDITIONS words, and must carry the writer's name, money, keep the beds full, and ogen. The effects of regular cof- Editor, Wanda Si'mple address, and telephone number (although this give people whatever vices they fee were not distinguished from Associate Editors, Simone Doleyres, French; number will not be printed). Letters must be are used to so that we can get their those of caffeine-free coffee." Humberto Rasi, Raul Villanueva, Spanish legible, preferably typewritten, and double- SOUTH AMERICAN EDITIONS spaced. All will be edited to meet space and business. GENE A. SWANSON, M.D. literary requirements, but the author's mean- Editor, R. S. Lessa, Portuguese ing will not be changed. Views expressed in I have worked in an Adventist Akron, Ohio Editor, Jose Tabuenca, Spanish the letters do not necessarily represent those hospital where Adventist stand- CORRESPONDENTS, of the editors or of the denomination. ards have been upheld, but I am WORLD DIVISIONS Not beyond temptation Africa-Indian Ocean, J. B. Kio; Afro-Mideast, afraid that there are more institu- D. Jean Thomas; Australasian, R. M. Kranz; Why call this a witness? tions like the one I just described. Not long ago a man came to my Euro-Africa, Heinz Hopf; Far Eastern, M. G. door and asked me, "If you Townend; Inter-American, Fred Hernandez; Re "SDA Nurses Needed" NAME WITHHELD Northern European, H. J. Smit; South Ameri- (July 9). should die tonight would you go can, Arthur S. Valle; Southern Asia, A. M. to heaven?" I told him that the Peterson; Trans-Africa, Barbara Mittleider I am an Adventist nurse work- Caffeine not sole' culprit Bible teaching concerning a per- CORRESPONDENTS, ing in an Adventist hospital and I "Caffeine Update" (Aug. 27) son's condition in death and the NORTH AMERICA feel that our main need is for the UNIONS: Atlantic, Leon H. Davis; Cana- was excellent, but it and the impending judgment precludes hospital administration to comment on drinking coffee in dian, P. F. Lemon, Columbia, Ernest N. our going to heaven when we die. Wendth; Lake, Jere Wallack; Mid-America, reassess our goals and mission. This Week were misleading in Halle G. Crowson; North Pacific, Morten Since that time I have come Our hospital seems to do little that they seemed to imply that Juberg; Pacific, Shirley Burton; Southern, across the following in Christ's George Powell; Southwestern, Richard W. to carry out the counsel from the caffeine is the Bendall culprit associated Object Lessons, Spirit of Prophecy quoted in the with many illnesses. Not so. page 155: "Never can we safely put confi- UNIVERSITIES: Andrews, Chris Robinson; article, "to disseminate light, and Caffeine is Loma Linda, Richard Weismeyer not the sole culprit. dence in self or feel, this side of to advance reform." Our particu- Other pollutants found in CIRCULATION heaven, that we are secure against lar institution allows smoking in decaffeinated coffees and soft Manager, Robert S. Smith temptation. Those who accept the Associate Manager, E. W. Moore patients' rooms, meat is served drinks cause great harm to the Field Representative, Ron D. Spear Saviour, however sincere their unless vegetarian meals are body as well. Phosphoric acid Advertising and Marketing, Edmund M. conversion, should never be Peterson ordered specifically, coffee and causes bleeding from the kidneys taught to say or feel that they are tea are served, TV blares from the and is found in nearly all soft TO CONTRIBUTORS saved. . . . Every one should be Unsolicited manuscripts are welcome, but rooms on Sabbath, and, even drinks. notification as to acceptance or rejection may taught to cherish hope and faith; though it is discouraged, elective American Medical News, be expected only if accompanied by a stamped, July but even when we give ourselves self-addressed envelope. surgeries are scheduled on Sab- 17, 1981, states that "gastric acid to Christ and know that He An index is published in the lastReview of June bath for doctor or patient conve- secretion and gastrin release were accepts us, we are not beyond the and December. The Adventist Review is nience. greater in response to decaffein- indexed in the Seventh-day Adventist Periodi- reach of temptation." cal Index. Recently the hospital dedicated ated coffee than to peptone, MARGARET J. CHAMBERS a smoking room inside the hospi- which previously had been con- The Adventist Review (ISSN 0161-1119) is Houston, Texas published every Thursday. Copyright © 1981 tal for the convenience of visitors. sidered the strongest stimulant." Review and Herald Publishing Association, 6856 Eastern Avenue NW., Takoma Park, Non-Adventist nurses who The Journal of the American Or. This statement is designed not Washington, D.C. 20012, U.S.A. Second- have worked in this hospital for Medical Association, Jan. 9, to decrease one's assurance of class postage paid at Washington, D.C. many years have told me of the Subscriptions: one year, US$21.95. Single 1981, states: "The fact that habit- salvation but to caution against copy, 70 cents U.S. currency. Prices subject to difference they have noticed from ual consumption of decaffeinated placing confidence in self. One is change without notice. the careful Sabbathkeeping poli- coffee was significantly greater safe only by giving oneself to Vol. 158, No. 38. cies in the past to the present. among pancreatic cancer cases Jesus and abiding in Him.
2 (874) ADVENTIST REVIEW, SEPTEMBER 17, 1981 "Nowhere," Ramik pointed out, "have we found the books of Ellen G. White to Ellen White's use of sources be virtually the 'same plan and character throughout' as those of her predecessors. Washington copyright lawyer concludes that Nor have we found, or have critics made Ellen White was not a plagiarist and her reference to, any intention of Ellen White to supersede . . . [other authors] in the works did not constitute copyright infringement. market with the same class of readers and See also editorial "This work is of God, o is not," page 13. purchasers." Instead, she invariably introduced considerable new matter to that which she borrowed, going far beyond mere "colorable deviations," and, in effect, created an altogether new literary work. Ellen G. White is not guilty of 5. What case law is available between Furthermore, "the sheer 'compila- copyright infringement or plagiarism. 1850 and 1915 that might suggest the tion' of the works of Ellen G. White This is the opinion of Vincent L. Ramik, extent of an author's protection against necessarily reflects her labor and skill. So senior partner of Diller, Ramik & Wight, literary piracy? long as she did not (and the evidence Ltd., a lawyer who practices patent, 6. Is there anything within the pub- clearly establishes that she did not) draw trademark, and copyright law in Wash- lished works of Ellen G. White that from any prior works 'to a substantial ington, D.C. would suggest literary piracy (Federal degree,' she remains well within the Mr. Ramik undertook to research Mrs. copyright infringement) within the stand- legal bounds of 'fair use.' White's writings after Warren L. Johns, ards existing between 1850 and 1915? "Moreoever, so long as the materials chief legal officer of the General Confer- Ellen White's literary output report- were selected from a variety of sources, ence, retained the services of Diller, edly approximated 25 million words and were 'arranged and combined with Ramik & Wight last April because of during a writing career spanning nearly certain passages of the text of the original allegations made against Mrs. White by 70 years. A number of the 90-plus books, work, and in a manner showing the Walter Rea, at that time pastor of the including compilations, from her pen in exercise of discretion, skill, learning, Long Beach, California, church. print today have been translated into as experience, and judgment,' the use was Ramik, a Roman Catholic, spent more many as 100 languages. `fair.' " than 300 hours researching about 1,000 The fact that Mrs. White incorporated Intent is a chief ingredient that must be relevant cases in American legal history. quotations and paraphrased materials demonstrated in plagiarism cases; and He concluded his 27-page legal opinion* from other authors (principally historians Ramik believes he has proved not only with an unequivocal declaration: "Based of the Reformation era and contemporary from Mrs. White's own published state- upon our review of the facts and legal nineteenth-century devotional writers) in ments but indeed from the admission of precedents . . . Ellen White was not a her books and articles has itself never some of her critics themselves, that she plagiarist, and her works did not consti- been at issue. She, during her lifetime, did not intend to defraud in the borrowing tute copyright infringement/piracy." and church officials, subsequently, have of other literary productions. The legal report was delivered to repeatedly acknowledged such use. But "Proceeding with but the highest Johns's office late last month. It responds Walter Rea undertook the task of identi- motivations and intentions," said specifically to six questions: fying the various sources of that literary Ramik, Mrs. White, in fact "modified, 1. Was there a Federal copyright law borrowing. This study demonstrated that exalted, and improved" much of that between the years 1850 (when Ellen Mrs. White had borrowed more extensi- which others wrote, in a manner entirely White first published) and 1915 (the year vely than had been estimated previously. ethical, as well as legal. of her death) granting literary property "It is impossible to imagine that the Books not copyrighted rights to authors? If so, what was the intention of Ellen G. White, as reflected essence of such law? Did it substantially Ramik discovered that many of the in her writings and the unquestionably differ from copyright law in 1981? books from which Mrs. White borrowed prodigious effort involved therein, was 2. Was the payment of royalties by were not in fact copyrighted. But, he anything other than a sincerely motivated publishers a standard legal and business continued, even if they had been thus and unselfish effort to place the under- practice at that time? protected by law, her utilization of standings of Biblical truths in a coherent 3. Were licensing agreements for the phraseology and even multiple para- form for all to see and comprehend. use of literary property standard business graphs did not in law constitute copyright "Most certainly, the nature and con- practice at that time? infringement, nor plagiarism. tent of her writings had but one hope and 4. Was there a standard literary prac- "If the issues had been court-tested intent, namely, the furthering of man- tice to use quotation marks, footnotes, between 1850 and 1915, Ellen G. White kind's understanding of the word of and bibliographical citations in literary emphatically would not have been con- God." works that utilized the literary property victed of copyright infringement," con- In his summation, Ramik concluded, of other authors? concluded Ramik. "Considering all factors necessary in The law specialist found it ironic that reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it * The complete document may be obtained by sending a Mrs. White's sternest critics themselves is submitted that the writings of Ellen G. request, with $5.00, to the General Conference Legal offer "the best evidence available" to White were conclusively unplagiaris- Services Office, Dept. RD, Takoma Park, Washington, D.C. 20012. support a position of noninfringement. tic. " ❑ ADVENTIST REVIEW, SEPTEMBER 17, 1981 (875) 3 9 9 her writings that changed my mind. And I think there's a distinction—a very "There simply is no case salient difference—here. REVIEW: Would you describe the Interview about Ellen White and her writings distinction that you see? Ramik: I believe that the critics have with Attorney Vincent L. Ramik, missed the boat badly by focusing upon senior partner of Diller, Ramik & Wight, Ltd., Mrs. White's writings, instead of focus- ing upon the messages in Mrs. White's specialists in patent, trademark, and copyright writings. cases, Washington, D.C. REVIEW: What did you find in her messages, Mr. Ramik? How did they affect you? Ramik: Mrs. White moved me! In all REVIEW: Attorney Ramik, how much material by critics all the way from D. M. candor, she moved me. I am a Roman did you know about Seventh-day Canright down to Walter Rea. And he Catholic; but, Catholic, Protestant, Adventists in general, and Ellen White also gave me a number of works by whatever—she moved me. And I think in particular, before you were asked Adventist authors who attempted to her writings should move anyone, unless to research the legal questions in- defend Mrs. White. In the report I have he is permanently biased and is unsway- volved in Mrs. White's use of literary listed many works that were consulted. able. sources? REVIEW: What was your reaction REVIEW: Would you explain what Ramik: Actually, my knowledge was after digesting all of this material? you mean by this? quite limited. Our firm had done some Ramik: Well, that's an interesting Ramik: Well, a person can walk this work for Seventh-day Adventists, proba- question! I started out, I think, basically earth doing good deeds and saying to bly 50 years ago, before I became a neutral on the literary charges. But, himself (and maybe to others): "I'm a member of it. And we continued to somehow, as I read one particular nice person." And after a time you really represent Adventists in various matters Adventist-authored defense of Mrs. come to believe that you are. But when through the years. But my knowledge of White, it left me with the feeling that she was the last time that you really looked them as a people was minimal. And I was not, in fact, very well defended. inside yourself and found out what you knew scarcely anything of Ellen White REVIEW: What do you mean by that? were really like? Now, there are a lot of other than what I had picked up in Ramik: Well, I came back thinking things that Mrs. White has put down on newspapers off and on—and, of course, that Mrs. White was, if I may use the paper that will, if read seriously, perhaps last November in that large half-page expression that has been used by others, a cause a person to look inwardly, hon- story in the Washington Post that was not literary "borrower." And that she had estly. And if you do, the true self comes exactly favorable. borrowed a lot and that she had borrowed out. I think I know a little more today REVIEW: Do you recall how you were with something less than candor and about the real Vince Ramik than I did brought into this present case? honesty! In other words—and this was before I started reading the message of Ramik: Yes. Attorney Warren Johns, before I had delved into her works Ellen White, not simply her writings. of your General Conference Legal Serv- themselves—I became actually biased REVIEW: Were you surprised at this ices office, contacted me and asked against her in the sense that I thought she reaction? perhaps a half-dozen questions, in the was what some people, such as her latest Ramik: I guess "pleasantly sur- abstract, about plagiarism, literary critic, Walter Rea, had alleged—guilty prised" would be a very mild understate- piracy, copyright infringement, things of plagiarism. ment. But she says some very deep like that. But no names were attached. REVIEW: Once you got into her things, quite frankly, even if they sound Having read the Post article not long writings themselves, was this negative as if they've been said before. Quite before, I asked Mr. Johns, "Does this impression reinforced or altered in honestly, I think I've left this task with have anything to do with the Ellen White any way? more than I've put into it. And it's simply issue in your church?" He responded that Ramik: I gradually turned 180 her messages. It's simply what you indeed it did. And we went on from degrees in the other direction. I found receive from reading something. It there. that the charges simply were not true. But makes you believe a little more firmly in REVIEW: Once you were retained on I had to get that from her writings; I did things you may have believed a little bit the case, what preparation did you not get that from either the people who less in the past. I'm not a religious make by way of reading, before said she was a plagiarist, or the people person; I am not a practicing Roman researching the law as it relates to who said she was not. I simply had to Catholic. I was born one; but my wife literary matters? read her writings and then rid my mind of happens to be a Protestant; one child is Ramik: I obtained a copy of Mrs. the bias I had already built into it—preju- baptized a Catholic, one is baptized a White's The Great Controversy, which I dice. And, in the end, she came out quite Protestant. I guess you could say we are read all the way through. I obtained favorably. But it took more than 300 an "ecumenical" family! Essentially, copies of other works by Mrs. White. I hours of reading—including case law my outlook on anything, including this contacted Ron Graybill, of your General histories, of course. work and in my daily life, is searching for Conference, and he gave me a lot of REVIEW: So it was reading her writ- God's will for me; and then, I hope, material—a book on the life of Christ by ings that changed your mind? having the wisdom and courage to carry Hanna, things like that. He also gave me Ramik: It was reading her messages in it out. I do have a God of my under- 4 (876) ADVENTIST REVIEW, SEPTEMBER 17, 1981 standing. Mrs. White has made me "Aha! I find it here. And he took it from public domain—were thus public understand Him a bit better. And for that, an earlier writer. And here's another property. You went on, further, to I think I'm a better person today than one." point out that even if they had been when I started this project. Let me explain it this way: Last night I copyrighted, Ellen White's use of these REVIEW: And the message? reread my memorandum on this case, materials fell well within the carefully Ramik: The message is what is and I noticed that I had used the adjective prescribed boundaries of "fair use," crucial. The critic reads a sentence, and "prodigious" in referring to Mrs. White as defined by the law of her day. One receives no meaning from it—he may, as a writer. Then, by coincidence, I contemporary critic, however, raises and often does, even take it out of happened to read, also last night, a book the question of ethics and propriety: context. But read the entire message. loaned me entitled The Vision Bold. And Was it moral for Ellen White to What is the author's intent? What is the it spoke of Mrs. White as a "prodigious" borrow heavily from other people's author really saying—where the words writer. Then, when I walked into this literary productions and not, at least, come from is really not that important. room this afternoon, someone here called acknowledge the sources? Would you What is the message of this? If you her a "prodigious" writer. Well, I did care to respond to the question of disregard the message, then even the not use the term because it was used by ethics here? Bible itself is not worth being read, in someone else; I used it because it's a Ramik: Well, yes. Walter Rea has that sense of the word. natural word for me to use. But the critics publicly said (and I've listened to the REVIEW: Which of Mrs. White's jump on that sort of thing and make a cassette recording of one of his presenta- books did you find most helpful? mountain out of a molehill. tions and then read the verbatim tran- Ramik: The only one I read all the And another question the critic usually script carefully) that there is nothing way through was The Great Contro- ignores is this: Was the statement that the "moral" in a purely legal definition of versy. But, actually, before I finished my alleged "borrower" had taken from the plagiarism. Of course, elsewhere, he research, I had read a great cross section earlier author really original with the attacks Mrs. White on moral grounds, on of her books. I really don't think it makes earlier author—or did, perhaps, he take ethical use of others' materials. Well, all that much difference which of her it, consciously or otherwise, from some- first, he's totally wrong in saying there's books one reads; I think it is whatever one still earlier? no element of morality in the charge of work of hers you happen to have before Now let's take Walter Rea. He reads plagiarism. H. M. Paull, who wrote you, for whatever purpose you need it. Ellen White and says: I found a certain Literary Ethics about 1928, is still today REVIEW: And it didn't bother you, phrase here, a certain paragraph there, a recognized authority on the subject. worry you, that certain people were and it came from this predecessor. Well, Incidentally, while he never came right saying that she had borrowed heavily that's not proof; that's assumption. And I out and defined "plagiarism" in his book from other writers and books? think the first step in any accurate critique (because, as I said a moment ago, Ramik: Forty or four hundred— is to go back to the real original—it "plagiarism," per se, is not a crime), he frankly it's quite immaterial. It would not might be Virgil, Homer, the Bible. does contrast plagiarism with piracy. The make any difference to me if they were Because how do you know it was original literary pirate does not care whether he all taken from other works. with the predecessor—how do you know gets caught; but the plagiarist worries REVIEW: What about plagiarism, he did not get it from someone else who, that he will be found out. (And you say then? Is there really no such thing as in turn, got it from still another earlier there's no element of morality involved plagiarism? someone else? Didn't Solomon say, in plagiarism!) Incidentally, to accuse Ramik: There is no such thing, in law, "There is no new thing under the sun"? Ellen White of plagiarizing Conybeare & as "plagiarism. " Literary crimes are REVIEW: In your legal opinion, Mr. Howson's uncopyrighted Life of Paul is those of either piracy or of copyright Ramik, you pointed out that many of absurd, if for no other reason than the fact infringement. Literary theft—piracy—is the works Mrs. White is accused of that she publicly urged her readers to get not such an easy thing to prove. You "stealing" were, in fact, not a copy and read it for themselves. cannot read someone's writing, and find copyrighted by either author or pub- REVIEW: All right; but, still, would a word, a phrase, a sentence, and say, lisher, and were, therefore, in the you care to comment upon whether Ellen White encroached in the area of ethics by using materials—quotations, paraphrases, ideas, and so on—of others without publicly stating where she got them? Ramik: There is no reason why Ellen White could not use the ideas of others in expressing the thoughts she wished to convey. It's not even rational to expect someone writing on a theological sub- ject, for example, to write in the abstract without researching what others who have gone before—or even contem- poraries—have said on the subject. In the middle of the nineteenth cen- Interviewing Attorney Vincent L. Ramik (second from left) for the REVIEW are (left to right) Victor Cooper, General Conference associate communication director; Roger Coon, associate secretary tury—just when Ellen White was begin- of the Ellen G. White Estate; and Warren L. Johns, of the General Conference Legal Services. ning to write for print, 1845—in the ADVENTIST REVIEW, SEPTEMBER 17, 1981 (877) 5
ous. On the contrary, it's the sensible But I get that simply from her writings. man, the wise man, who makes use of I was not there when she wrote, and I that which was done in the past, when it suppose that few of the critics were, was done well. Somewhere in one of our either. I have a feeling that unless you legal archives there is an inscription over had some type of "motivation," you the door, "Past Is Prologue." I believe simply could not deliver in words that that applies to writings, too. which I have received from her writings. Ellen White used the writings of Now, I, personally, could not be others; but in the way she used them, she disturbed by the thought that God may made them uniquely her own, ethically, have inspired her to select something as well as legally. And, interestingly, she from a certain book. And if God inspired invariably improved that which she her to select something that was written "selected"! better by someone else than she could REVIEW: Do you have anything you have written it herself, so what? would like to add on this fascinating Actually, in the final analysis, I think it subject? all comes down to a question of faith. And, for myself, I have no trouble in Ramik: Yes. I believe it was Warren accepting what she wrote as a matter of Vincent L. Ramik Johns who shared this analogy with me faith. once when we were discussing this case The bottom line is: What really counts and point. The situation is something like legal case of Emerson v. Davies, is the message of Mrs. White, not merely Massachusetts Circuit Justice Story in the builder who wishes to build a house. the mechanical writings—words, effect exonerates a writer who has used There are certain basic, essential units of clauses, sentences—of Mrs. White. The- building materials that are available to other men's words and ideas and woven ologians, I am told, distinguish here them into his own composition. him—windows, doors, bricks, and so between verbal inspiration and plenary In effect, Judge Story says, Only fools on. There are even certain recognizable attempt to do that which has been done kinds of textures and styles that have better in the past; no one really ever been created by various combinations of builds a language exclusively his own. these different materials by earlier In other words, the words themselves builders. have been there for years and years. The The builder brings together many of crucial issue is how you put them these and uses them. Yet the design of the together, and the effect you wish to house, the ultimate appearance, the produce from those words. ultimate shape, the size, the feel, are all Now, if someone in the past, accord- unique to the immediate, contemporary ing to Judge Story, has written something builder. He individually puts his own that is splendidly written—something stamp upon the final product—and it is that is historical, something that is a uniquely his. (And he doesn't say—or common, everyday human experience or need to say—I got this brick here, that occurrence—why should you break your door there, this window there, either!) back trying to say it better than someone I think it was that way with Ellen else has already said it? White's use of words, phrases, clauses, For those types of writings, there is sentences, paragraphs, yes, and even absolutely nothing wrong or incongru- pages, from the writings of those who went before her. She stayed well within Warren L. Johns the legal boundaries of "fair use," and all the time created something that was substantially greater (and even more inspiration. Too many of the critics have beautiful) than the mere sum of the missed the boat altogether. And it's too component parts. And I think the ulti- bad, too! mate tragedy is that the critics fail to see I, personally, have been moved, this. deeply moved, by those writings. I have I have been asked whether I thought been changed by them. I think I am a Ellen White was "inspired." Well, better man today because of them. And I inspiration is a theological word, not a wish that the critics could discover that! legal word; and I am more at home with REVIEW: Attorney Ramik, how legal words than I am with theological would you sum up the legal case words. against Ellen White as far as charges of I don't know whether she was plagiarism, piracy, and copyright inspired, in the theological sense. I do infringement are concerned? believe that she was highly motivated. Ramik: If I had to be involved in such And if it wasn't God who motivated her, a legal case, I would much rather appear then I don't know who it could have as defense counsel than for the prosecu- Victor Cooper been. tion. There simply is no case! ❑ 6 (878) ADVENTIST REVIEW, SEPTEMBER 17, 1981 The story behind this research An interview with Warren L. Johns, chief counsel of the Office of General Counsel, General Conference of SDA.
REVIEW: Attorney Johns, how and terms, would probably rank about fiftieth White's use of literary materials of other under what circumstances did the in Fortune magazine's well-known list of authors she clearly was within the legal Legal Services of the General Confer- the top 500 corporations in the United definition of "fair use." By the defini- ence come to be involved in retaining States today. We already were very busy tions established in the law itself she is the firm of Diller, Ramik & Wight, with other work, especially with First seen to be operating not only well within Ltd., to research questions pertaining Amendment issues and challenges. the law but in a high, ethical manner, as to Ellen White and her use of literary Then, too, the plagiarism charges present well. The charges made against her sources? some incredibly deep and complex legal simply do not hold water. She did not Johns: Well, last October an issues. We felt we must have a specialist, operate in an underhanded, devious, Adventist pastor on the West Coast was and that's what we got. The best firms in unethical manner as charged. She was an featured prominently in the Los Angeles this branch of law are here in Washing- honest, honorable Christian woman and Times, and serious allegations of plagia- ton, and we have worked with Mr. author. I also might add that in law there rism were raised against Ellen G. White. Ramik's office on other cases for the past is a legal test of a causal factor that might The story, carried by a wire service and a four or five years. During this time we well be applied to Mrs. White's min- news syndicate, appeared in dozens of have found him to be highly professional istry—we sometimes speak of it as the newspapers across North America. It and superbly competent. Because of his "but for" test: but for this particular even found its way into the Manchester demonstrated ability and undoubted event, or cause, or action, that particular Guardian in England. Understandably, expertise in this field, we have developed result would not have occurred. And I see it raised a lot of questions in the minds of great respect for him. Ellen White in that light. But for Ellen G. our church members, as well as among REVIEW: Did the fact that Mr. White there would have been no non-Adventist readers. Last April—six Ramik, a Roman Catholic, would of Seventh-day Adventist Church, as we months later—our office decided that we necessity have to read The Great know it today. ought to get to the bottom of the legal Controversy in its entirety (which REVIEW: That's interesting! And aspects and implications of the case. So some Catholics find personally offen- how do you view the future? we retained the services of a highly sive) concern you as you contemplated Johns: I tend to agree with Sociologist reputable firm specializing in patent, retaining him? Irmgard Simon, a doctoral candidate at a trademark, and copyright law. And they Johns: We recognized that some university in Miinster, Westphalia, Ger- have now tendered their very compre- Adventists might wonder about whether many, who, in 1965, wrote in her Ph.D. hensive legal opinion. he could be objective. But, on the other thesis (which dealt with Adventism and REVIEW: Did the General Conference hand, if we hired an Adventist lawyer Mrs. White): "The Seventh-day Advent- officers or the Ellen G. White Estate and he came up with a favorable conclu- ists still live on the spirit of Ellen G. request you to proceed in this direc- sion some perhaps would say, "Oh, White, and only as far as this heritage tion? well, he had an ax to grind—what else lives on do the Adventists have a Johns: No. We acted entirely on our would you expect?" Anyway, we future." Last January 19, Newsweek' s own initiative. Neither of these groups already knew Mr. Ramik to be highly religion editor, Kenneth L. Woodward, was involved. On April 21, I told the professional and objective; and, most observed in a similar vein: "If it loses its secretary of the White Estate what we important, we wanted to know the founding mother, the church may find proposed to do; but neither his depart- truth—let the chips fall where they that it has also lost its distinctive ment nor the GC officers initiated it. might. We felt he would discover the visionary soul." Besides, none of us knew either the facts, apply the law, and settle the issue REVIEW: What will be the impact of direction the research was taking or the for the church once and for all. the Ramik report on the church, and conclusions reached until the work was REVIEW: Do you feel that his com- on the critics of Ellen White? Will it finished and the report was in. The cost of prehensive, closely reasoned 27-page silence the critics? this kind of legal research is substantial; report settles the issues raised? Johns: Well,'I am sure it will confirm but our office felt it was important to get Johns: Absolutely! the faith of those who have been made the truth, hence our office is paying the REVIEW: What do you feel is the uneasy by allegations now shown to be bill for the work that was done. significance—the meaning—of this without foundation. And it may cause REVIEW: Why did you choose Diller, report for our church? some second thoughts among some of the Ramik & Wight, Ltd., for this task? Johns: The charges about plagiarism, critics. But, in the final analysis, for Johns: First of all, our office has only literary piracy, copyright infringement, those who choose to believe, no proof is three lawyers to serve the General and so on, are shown to be entirely necessary; and for those who choose to Conference—and the GC, in financial without foundation in law. In Mrs. disbelieve, no proof is possible! ❑ ADVENTIST REVIEW, SEPTEMBER 17, 1981 (879) 7 By beholding we become changed-2 and will do so throughout eternity. But it is to say that God respects creaturely choice and freedom. God will not force a revelation of Himself upon those who refuse to receive Is seeing believing? it. Our salvation is possible only when we behold a true As did our first parents, we face revelation of Jesus Christ. We behold Him by studying a tree of life and a tree of His life. Salvation has to do with change, and change comes through beholding Him. Damnation also has to do knowledge of good and evil. with change, as concentrating our attention on man-made idols takes the place of beholding Jesus. Beholding anything that leads us away from Christ destroys us. Because Satan knows this from firsthand experience, he applies this principle with almost total success throughout the world. Appeal to the senses! Get through to the mind screen! Take control of the mind through the argument that "seeing is believing." These are Satan's tactics. Consider Eden. Satan questioned, "Hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?" (Gen. 3:1). Eve responded, "God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die" (verse 3). But Satan appealed to his own example—he was touching it; yet he was not dead. After pointing that out, he placed some fruit in her By NORMAN R. GULLEY hands (see Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 55). "And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it Why is there no plan of salvation for the fallen angels? was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make Unlike humans, they lived in God's presence at the one wise, she took the fruit thereof, and did eat" (verse 6). throne. They had constant opportunities to behold Him. "Seeing is believing" led to the fall of our ancestors in Sin, terrible mystery that it is, should never have arisen. Eden.
It arose in the mind of Lucifer, his imagination projecting The same strategy will capture this final generation. a false image of God onto the screen of his consciousness. John says: "I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out He chose to behold this misrepresentation rather than the of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the genuine revelation before him. By beholding the false, he beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they became changed. He pictured God improperly, thinking are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth of Him as unjust, believing He made a law impossible to unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to keep. Gradually these false concepts made Lucifer unjust gather them to the battle of that great day of God and rebellious. By beholding a false picture of Jesus— Almighty. Behold, I come as a thief" (Rev. 16:13-15). One who occupied a position that Lucifer felt he should Generation open to miracles have and thus a favored one—Lucifer became changed to Satan. Ours is a generation open to the miraculous. The The angels that listened to Lucifer's false portrayal of demand for psychic healing is spreading like wildfire. Father and Son also became changed. In time the change Miracles and tongues-speaking—two types of appeal to was irreversible; the angels had committed the unpardon- the senses—are found within the charismatic movement. able sin. Prior to their reaching this point God had pleaded The neopentecostal upsurge already has jumped over with Satan and his angels to return. His revelation of more than one hundred high denominational walls. mercy and concern for them should have touched their In contrast to the cold, arid, doctrinal divisions of hearts and brought change. But, steadfastly holding on to long-established denominations, this movement, with its the false picture, they refused to behold the genuine feeling of warmth and fervency, brings Christians picture of Jesus. They allowed their subjective beholding together. It comes as something inviting, something that to cancel out their objective beholding and became slaves ordinary people can hold on to in a time when there is little bound to erroneous misconceptions. There was nothing left to cling to. Prophecy predicted that "papists, who more that God could do for them. boast of miracles as a certain sign of the true church, will This is not to say that God had exhausted His be readily deceived by this wonder-working power; and self-revelation toward these fallen angels. He is constantly Protestants, having cast away the shield of truth, will also manifesting greater depths of His character to all creatures be deluded. Papists, Protestants, and worldlings will alike accept the form of godliness without the power."—The Norman R. Gulley is professor of religion at Southern Great Controversy, p. 588. Missionary College, Collegedale, Tennessee. The ultimate appeal to people's sight comes with
8 (880) ADVENTIST REVIEW, SEPTEMBER 17, 1981 Satan's impersonation of Christ. His deception will If "we are what we eat," then we are also (in mind) convince almost everyone (see The Great Controversy, what our mental diet is. Whatever occupies the mind's pp. 624, 625). attention controls it. This is why minds absorbed with the Although miracles will test Seventh-day Adventists, trivial will become trivial; minds absorbed in big ideas perhaps most will pass the test. Likewise the imperson- will become big; minds absorbed in worldly affairs will ation of Christ probably will not ensnare most of our become worldly; and minds absorbed in the holy will be members. They know that Christ will not touch the earth at elevated. His second advent (1 Thess. 4:16-18). The battle is for the mind. Whoever or whatever has our But what about television? Could this be the single most minds has us. Satan is out to "gain control of the whole potent force for robbing Adventists of eternal life? No mind" (The Great Controversy, p. 489). He knows that it generation in any period of history or in any place has had is the mind that "elevates man above the beasts" to face such a deluge of violence as modern Americans, (Testimonies, vol. 8, p. 127). If he can debase the mind by glued to the TV screens. TV is having more influence on getting it to behold evil, he has reduced humans to the human behavior than many would like to admit. level of the beasts. The world is fast coming to this level.
SPEAKING OUT teristics of our time. In the would happen, did not form a church of God these elements part of the body of truth as it was are not unwelcome, provided once held. Today this is no they do not disturb the well- longer so. We received this planned and already divinely stirring truth many years ago. inspected units of the church We have proclaimed it to mil- edifice. We cannot entertain, lions on earth. God has set His The foundation even momentarily, the thought stamp of approval upon it. that the building of which Jesus Would anyone today maintain stands secure Christ Himself is the foundation that we need to retrace our steps needs any drastic or major and reformulate elements that One measure of a church's strength is 2:19). No human or demon can alteration. already have been incorporated the degree of freedom its members have to speak out—to express minority points of lay any other foundation. In other words, the truths that into our foundation? Nothing view. At times the editors disagree with the could be further from the truth. opinions expressed in Speaking Out, but they The foundation of God's lie at the heart of the message of publish them to stimulate thought, to produce eternal church is not only the the remnant church cannot be Further light? Indeed so. But constructive discussion, and to allow readers to test the validity of the ideas presented. Lord Himself, it also is, of altered or improved. Even now, whatever form this additional necessity, the truth of God. throughout the world, they are illumination will take, we are Where Jesus reigns, His truth calling men and women to sure that it will not tear apart The significant structure that will provide the necessary repentance. Lives are being either the foundation or the is God's church on earth is guidelines. In spite of this fact, transformed today because the family of God. We should pray almost completed. The Archi- numerous substitute blueprints truth of the message is unassail- and search for additional light. tect is God Himself. We—the have been urged upon the over- able. It will come gradually and move saints, the members of God's seers appointed by God as His Our Lord's atoning death into the church in full synchro- household—are the structural helping hands. So far, none opened up a way of escape from nism with our needs and abili- units with which this divinely have added improvements, nor perdition for all mankind. His ties to understand. Above all, it conceived and living edifice has are other blueprints yet to be priestly ministry in the holy will create greater unity and not been bonded together. conceived likely to add to the places, for those that accept His disruption. Unfortunately, now The Foundation, the Corner- strength of the foundation gracious intercession, culmi- and then supposed new light has stone, is none other than Jesus already laid. nates in the great day of atone- caused God's edifice to tremble Christ. The prophets and apos- Since Jesus is the Truth, it is ment that vindicates God's just as if shaken by an earthquake. tles form a part of this support of the utmost importance that dealings with sinners. Finally, But the building of truth has insofar as they declared and we, as the structural subunits, His glorious return restores His always sustained and survived exemplified the truths revealed speak the truth, the whole truth, people to glory. These truths, the tremors. It will continue to by Jesus Christ. It is a most and nothing but the truth. "Let and others, form the founda- do so until the end. happy circumstance that no no one attempt to dilute truth tion, which needs no last-min- New light does not demand other foundation can be laid with a mixture of sophistry. Let ute substitutions. the reconstruction of God's than the One already firmly put no one attempt to tear down the Did the divine Architect foundation, nor a major change in place by God Himself. This foundation of our faith, or to blunder in His original specifi- in the structural design. So firm encouraging assurance also is spoil the pattern by bringing cations? The very thought are these that the Builder has put the guarantee of ultimate and into the web threads of human sounds blasphemous. Most cer- up a warning to anyone who lasting triumph. devising."—This Day With tainly, God's revelation of truth would tamper with them. But humans would not be God, p. 324. (Italics supplied.) has been and still is unfolding. God "has appointed that His sinful humans if they were not Attempts at dilution of truth So is our understanding of it. church on earth shall stand to try to alter or even find or tearing down the foundation There was a time when even perfectly united in the Spirit and substitutes for God's Founda- have been made through the certain core doctrines were counsel of the Lord of hosts to tion. In fact, this has been done ages. It is not surprising that being revealed in their simplest the end of time" (Selected repeatedly in spite of the warn- intensified attempts are being elements. Certainly, the truth Messages, book 2, p. 397). ing and declaration that God's made today. Change and dis- about the cleansing of the sanc- R. L. KLINGBEIL Foundation stands firm (2 Tim. covery are outstanding charac- tuary, as well as the time this Canby, Oregon