DOCSLIB.ORG

Dam Rating Curves, Nottely

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Attachment 02.04.03-08Q TVA letter dated February 2, 2010 RAI Response ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS/ENCLOSURES: Attachment 02.04.03-8Q: Dam Rating Curves, Nottely (106 Pages including Cover Sheet) NPG CALCULATIONCOVERSHEETICCRIS UPDATE Page., 1 REV 0 EDMS/RIMS.NO, EDMS!TYPE: EDMS ACCESSION NO (N/A fdr REV. 0) L58f081211 801 Calculations(nuclear) L 5 , 0,91 23 0 02•8 Calc Title: Dam Rating Curve, Ntte!y CC I TYPE ORG PLANT BRANCH NUMBER CURREV ENEWIEVION APPLICABILITY CURRENT CN NUC GEN' CEB CDQ0000200"8001I6 1: 2 EntireSeliectages calc 09 [I NEW I;No CCRIS Changes '[I ACTION NEW 1 1DELETE E 1SUPERSEDE [I CCRIS.UPDATE Oi4LY•D [-(For calcrevislon,:CCRIS REVISION 0 RENAME I DUPLICATEi 0 Ve lfler.Approva :Signatures Not i been reviowed and no I Required) j,-CCRIS changes required) UNITS SYSTEMS UNIDS N/A N/A N/A DCN.EDC.NIA APPLICABLE'DESIGN DOCUMENT(S. CLASSIFICATION '*See-below N/A E QUALITY SAFETY' UNVERIFIED SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS. DESIGN OUTPUT SAR/TSand/or ISFSI RELATED? RELATEDT(If yes, ASSUMPTION AND/OR LIMITINGCONDITIONS? .ATTACHMENT? SAR/CoCAFFECTED, Yes'o No[-: QR=yes) Yes[-] No 0 YesD No[C YesD No0Z Yes.] No.0 Yes0 "Nol- PREPARER ID PREPARER PHONE;NO -PREPARING ORG (BRANCH), VERIFICATION METHOD NEW METHOD OF ANALYSIS J. B.Mauter 205:298-6074 'CEB Design Review [] Yes; O'No PREPARER SIGNATURE DATE CHECKER SIGNAT •Ey, ,0E JaileZB.,Mauter (•11-. AndrewC. Murr"/hk 'A( zi• oT VERIFIER SIGN -DATE APPRPVAL SIGNTUR~E I I DATE Andrew C. Murr 4v_,///f/oc z STATEMENT OF PROBLEM/ABSTRACT Headwater rating curvesfor20fdams are required as-inputs to.TVA'siSOCH'and TRBROUTE models, which perform flood-routing calculations for the-Tennessee River and tributaries. The headwater-rating curves:for each dam provide, total dam discharge as afunction of headwater elevationm, This calculation presents the, headwater rating curve for Nottely Dam; This-calculation contains electronic~attachments~andmust be~stored In EDMSas an ADOBE .pdf file to maintainthe ability to retrieve the:electrodic attachments. #EDCN22404A (SQN), EDCN.54018AX(WBN), EDCN Later (BFN) MICROFICHEJEFICHE Yes 0 No 0 FICHE NUMBER(S) 0l LOAD INTO EDMS AND DESTROY " 0 LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN-CALCULATION TO CALCULATION LIBRARY.. ADDRESS: LP4D-C 0l LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN(CALCULATION TO: TVA 40532'110-2008] Page I of 2 0NEDP-2-1 [10-20-20081 L58 081211 6o0I TVAN CALCULATION COVERSHEETICCRIS UPDATE Page I REV 0 EDMS/,RIMS NO. EDMS YPE: EDMS AC(CESION NO (N/A for REV 0) Calc Title: Dam Rating Curves, Nottely SUPLAN BRANCHNU. 'U NEW REV REVISION CURRENT ON Entire calc 1 NUC Selected pages 0 NEW CN NUC GEN CEB CD00W0020080016 NfA 0 ... '"No CCRIS Changes [] ACTION NEW 0 DELETE REVISION QL'SUPERSEDE' Q CRIS UPDATE ONLY (for caic revis•on. CCRIS 0 RENAE [I DUPLICATE 0 (Veder Approval SlgnaluresNot i been raiiewed and no REAM • DUPLIequAreTE CCRISchengas reqJfred) 3)NI SSTM UNIDS! 000 N/A N/A 0L•D..NIA A-PPUCASLE DESIGN 0OCUMENTIS) . .... .. FIC.. N/A NIA E gI ti 2AFETY ReLATED7 UNVERIFIED SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS SIGN SAR/S and/or ,SFSI yEL&ID? (Ifeyes.R=yes) ASSUMPTION AND/OR LIMITING CONDITIONS? ACHM- ''? SAR/CoC AFFECTED Yes No Yes N0 Yessoo Yea Qo- No• Yes CNO to Yes PREPARER ID PREPARERPiHONENO. PREPARINGORGQBRANCH) VERIFICATION MET_•-OD NEW METHOD OF ANALYSIS A. T. T n1e 805-220-4418 CR9, DesIgn RevIew 0 Yes 0 No PREP-ARE IGNATURE DATE CHECKER SIqNATURE DATE v R ,%TE ýA S" T dATE STATEMENT OF PROL3LEMA3S'TRAC Headwater rating curves for.20 dams are required as Inputs to TVA's SOCH and TRBROUTE models, which perform food-routing calculations for the Tennessee River andtributaries. The headwater rating curves for each dam, provide total dam discharge as a function of heedwaler elevation. This calculatfonrpresents the headwatsr rating curve for Nottely Dam. This calculation coniains electronic attachments and must be stored'in EDMS~as an ADOBE .pdf file to maintain the ability to retrieve the electronic attachments. MICRbF(CHE/EFICHE Yes 0 NoUý FICHE NUMBER(S, " LOAD INTO EOMSANDDESTROY l LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO CALCULATION LIBRARY. ADDRESS: LP4D-C rl LbAD iNTO EOnMS AND ETURN CALCULATION :TO 7"VA 40532 [07-2005I NA2DP412- [07-01-200fl TVAN CALCULATION COVERSHEETICCRIS UPDATE Page 1 b REV 0 EDMS/RIMS NO. EDMS TYPE: 'EDMS ACCESSION NO (N/A for REV. 0) L58 081211'801 Calculations (nuclear) L 5 8 0 0 2 1 0 0 Calc Title: Dam Rating Curves, Nottely CALC ID TYPE ORG PLANT BRANCH NUMBER CUR REV NEW REV. REVISION ____APPLICABILITY CURRENT CN NUC GEN CEB CDO000020080016 0 1 Entire cage JR, Selected pages 03 NEW No CCRIS Changes ACTION NEW El DELETE El ;,SUPERSEDE 0l CCRIS UPDATE ONLY 0 (For calc revision. CCRIS REVISION 0 . RENAME C] DUPLICATE [] I (Verifier Approval Signatures Not i been reviewed and no Reciuirad) CCRIS changes required) UNITS SYSTEMS UNIDS 000 N/A N/A DCN.EDC N/A APPLICABLE DESIGN DOCUMENT(S) CLASSIFICATION N/A N/A E QUALITY SAFETY RELATED? UNVERIFIED SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS DESIGN OUTPUT SARITS and/or ISF51 RELATED? (If yes, QR = yes) ASSUMPTION AND/OR LIMITING CONDITIONS? ATTACHMENT? SAR/CoC AFFECTED Yes 0 NoEl Yes N No Yes[[No l YesE] NoZI Yes]• No0E Yes-El No 0: PREPARER ID PREPARER PHONE NO P REPARING ORG.(BRANCH) VERIFICATION METHOD NEW METHOD OF ANALYSIS A. T. Tinsley 865-22-o4418 CEB Design Review El Yes 0 No PREPARER SIGNATURE DATE ýCHECKER SIGNATURE DATE VEAIFIER S/I',~hFR.' 'G DATE A•,PpROVAL SIGNATURE,••..•L•.. DATE Headwater rating curves for 20 dams are required as inputs to TVA's SOCH and TRBROUTE models, which perform flood-routing calculations for the Tennessee River and tributaries. The headwater rating curves for each dam provide total dam discharge as a function of headwater-elevation. This calculation presents the headwater rating curve for Nottely Dam. This calculation contains-electronic attachments and must be stored in EDMS as an ADOBE .pdf file to maintain the ability to, retrieve the electronic attachments. MICROFICHE/EFICHE 'Yes El No El FICHE NUMBER(S) E LOAD INTO EDMS AND DESTROY LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO CALCULATION LIBRARY. ADDRESS: LP4D-C .El LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO:............ TVA 40532 [07-2005] NEDP-2-1 [07-08-2005] NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEET/CCRIS UPDATE Page 2 C'AI 'I TYPE I fR:ý IPL ANT IRRANCI4 NI IMRIFR I RF~V I PLANT BRANCH NUMBER REV I CN NUC " GEN 21 CEB CDQ000020080016 ALTERNATE CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION BLDG ROOM ELEV COORD/AZIM FIRM Print Report Yes El BWSC CATEGORIES NA KEY NOUNS (A-add, D-delete) ACTION KEY NOUN A/D KEY NOUN (A/D) CROSS-REFERENCES (A-add, C-change, D-delete) ACTION XREF XREF XREF XREF XREF XREF (A/C/D) CODE TYPE PLANT BRANCH NUMBER REV A P EN WBN CEB 54018 A P EN SON CEB 22404 A S CN GEN CEB CDQ000020080053 ____ I___ I ___ I.____________ .1__ 4 4 + 4 4 t t I- 4 4 t t I- 4 4 4 4 + 4 4 4 4 t + 4 4 4 4 t CCRIS ONLY UPDATES: Following are required only when making keyword/cross reference CCRIS updates and page 1 of form NEDP-2-1 is not included: PREPARER SIGNATURE DATE CHECKER SIGNATURE DATE PREPARER PHONE NO. EDMS ACCESSION NO. TVA 40532 [10-2008] Page 2 of 2 NEDP-2-1 [10-20-2008] Page 3 NPG CALCULATION RECORD OF REVISION CALCULATION IDENTIFIER CDQ000020080016 Title Dam Rating Curve, Nottely Revision DESCRIPTION OF REVISION No. 0 Initial issue Revised Calculation to include Turbine Flow. Revised pages 1-11, 15, and 17-22. Revised Attachment 1. Added Attachments 7, 13, 16, and 22 (renumbered accordingly as necessary). 38 total pages after revision including RO cover sheet as page Ia. 2 This calculation was revised to address the following: " PER 203951. The verification of the original calculation was completed by personnel who had not completed the required NEDP-7 Job Performance Record (JPR). A verification JPR is now in place for all personnel engaged in verification tasks. Checking includes only changes made in this revision as the checking of the calculation was not impacted by PER 203951. The verification is inclusive of work completed prior to this revision. * PER 203872. Replace NEDP-2 forms on pages 1 through 6 with the forms from the NEDP-2 revision in effect at the time of calculation issuance. * UVA 3.2.1. Removed and replaced with Assumption 3.1.4 based on Reference 2.8. * UVA 3.2.2. Removed and replaced with Assumption 3.1.5 based on Reference 2.9. * Add Assumption 3.1.6 based on Technical Justification. & Updated Figure 8 and Table 5. " Add Case 2 for gate failure without turbine flow. * Add Figure 5 and Table 4. Significant changes to text in Revision 2 are marked with a right-hand margin revision bar. Administrative changes and typos are excluded. Pages Deleted: None Pages Revised: 1 - 7, 9-19, 22-25 New Pages added: lb, 5 Total hardcopy pages Revision 2: 42 Additional Comments: * Rev. 1 coversheet is page lb * Added Verification Form as page 5 * Updated page numbers * Include number of pages per attachment in Table of Contents TVA 40709 [10-20081 Page 1 of 1 NEDP-2-2 [10-20-2008] Page, NPG CALCULATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Calculation Identifier: CDQ000020080016 Revision: 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE Coversheet I Revision 0 Coversheet la Revision 1 Coversheet lb CCRIS Update Sheet 2 Revision Log 3 Table of Contents 4 Calculation Verification Form 5 Computer Input Sheet 6 1 Purpose 7 2 References 9 3 Assumptions & Methodology 10 4 Design Input 18 5 Special Requirements/Limiting Conditions 19 6 Calculations 20 7 Results/Conclusions 24 Figures 1 Nottely Dam, General Plan and Elevation (Ref.
Recommended publications
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
  • Assessment of Dissolved Oxygen Mitigation at Hydropower Dams Using an Integrated Hydrodynamic/Water Quality/Fish Growth Model

    Assessment of Dissolved Oxygen Mitigation at Hydropower Dams Using an Integrated Hydrodynamic/Water Quality/Fish Growth Model

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNT Digital Library ORNL/TM-2005/188 Assessment of Dissolved Oxygen Mitigation at Hydropower Dams Using an Integrated Hydrodynamic/Water Quality/Fish Growth Model MARCH 2006 Prepared by Mark S. Bevelhimer Charles C. Coutant Environmental Sciences Division DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge. Web site http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source. National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD 703-487-4639 Fax 703-605-6900 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source. Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone 865-576-8401 Fax 865-576-5728 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
  • Chatuge Hydroelectric Project Chatuge Dam Spillway

    Chatuge Hydroelectric Project Chatuge Dam Spillway

    NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Office of Archives and History Department of Natural and Cultural Resources NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Chatuge Hydroelectric Project Hayesville, Clay County, CY0025, Listed 08/11/2017 MPS: Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric System, 1933-1979 Nomination by Thomason and Associates Photographs by Thomason and Associates, July 2015 Chatuge Dam Spillway NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Chatuge Hydroelectric Project_________________________ Other names/site number: _________Chatuge Dam_____________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric Project, 1933-1979 (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: ____221 Old Ranger Road Road_______________________________________
  • TMDL Implementation Plans for Goat Rock Lake

    TMDL Implementation Plans for Goat Rock Lake

    TMDL Implementation Plan for Nottely River, Downstream of Lake Nottely -- Dissolved Oxygen Introduction The portion of the Nottely River downstream of the dam for Nottely Lake, is located near Ivy Log in Union County, a few miles northwest of Blairsville, Georgia. The Nottely Lake dam is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Reservoir water flows through the turbine generators in the dam to produce hydroelectric power. The water that for such use is taken from the lower (hypolimnion) zone of the Reservoir where the water is naturally lower in dissolved oxygen (D.O.). Plan for Implementation of the TMDL The TMDL for this and seven other low D.O. river segments below dams, was finalized in November, 2000. The designated use for the Nottely River downstream of the dam is for recreation. The applicable water quality standards there for D.O. are a concentration of 5 milligrams per liter (mg/l) as a daily average and a concentration of 4 mg/l as a minimum value. Attainment and maintenance of these two D.O. water quality standards are the goals of this Implementation Plan. The TMDL recommends that the appropriate federal and state agencies work together in developing an implementation strategy to provide higher oxygenated water from these dam releases. The TMDL adds that these strategies may include oxygenation or aeration of the water, redesigned spillways, or other measures, and that ongoing water quality monitoring is needed to monitor progress. The TVA has added compressors and blowers to add air to the water going through the turbines, when D.O.
  • Stream-Temperature Charcteristics in Georgia

    Stream-Temperature Charcteristics in Georgia

    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 .
  • Hiwassee Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017

    Hiwassee Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017

    Hiwassee Geographic Area June 1, 2017 **Disclaimer: The specific descriptions, goals, desired conditions, and objectives only apply to the National Forest System Lands within the Hiwassee Geographic Area. However, nearby communities and surrounding lands are considered and used as context. Hiwassee Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017 Description of area The Hiwassee Geographic Area is defined by large rivers running through broad flat valleys and two large lakes surrounded by mountains that provide distinct visitor experiences. The broad river valleys lie at lower elevations than other geographic areas in North Carolina’s National Forests. The steep mountains of this area support short leaf pine, mixed hardwood forests, and large pockets of eastern hemlock. Passing through a gentler mountain landscape, the major rivers of the region include the Hiwassee, Valley, and Nottley Rivers which flow into the Chatuge, Hiwassee, and Apalachia lakes. These rivers and the lakes created by Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) dams provide reactional opportunities for fishing, boating, and other water sports. The lakes of this geographic area form a chain that is home to a diverse number of plant, animal, and warm water fish species that are native to riparian floodplain ecosystems. Prior to European and Anglo-American settlement along with westward expansion, the Hiwassee geographic area was home to the Cherokee and Creek tribes. This area contains several landscape features that figure most prominently in Tribal history and have significant meaning to Tribal identities and beliefs. These locations are important traditional and ceremonial areas for the Cherokee. Communities within this geographic area include Murphy, Hayesville, Warne, Peachtree, Brasstown, Hiwassee Dam, Ranger and the smaller incorporated areas of Unaka and Violet.
  • TVA's Dams Provide Hydropower, Flood Control, Water Quality, Navigation

    TVA's Dams Provide Hydropower, Flood Control, Water Quality, Navigation

    TVA’s dams provide hydropower, ood Catawba Rhododendron (Rhododendron catawbiense) control, water quality, navigation and ample Lexington Destination water supply for the Tennessee Valley. Did you know that they also provide fun? Come summer, TVA operates its dams to ll the reservoirs for recreation. Boating, shing, swimming, rafting and blueway paddling are all supported Bald Eagle KENTUCKY by TVA with boat ramps, swim beaches and put ins. There are plenty of hiking (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and biking trails, picnic pavilions, playgrounds, campsites, scenic overlooks SOUTH and other day-use areas, too. So plan a TVA vacation this year—you’re sure HO W.V. ILLINOIS LSTON 77 to have a dam good time. o R i v i e Rainbow Trout South Holston Dam - 1951 h r (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Because of its depth and clarity, South Holston Lake is a O FORT premier destination for inland scuba diving. The aerating Paducah PATRICK weir below the dam has many benets—among them NRY creating an oxygen-rich environment that’s fostered a HE world-class trout shery. ORRIS 75 MISSOURI N Hopkinsville 65 Kentucky – 1944 24 Norris - 1936 CKY Norris Dam—the rst built by a newly VIRGINIA KENTU Around Kentucky Lake there are Ft. Patrick Henry - 1953 55 formed TVA—is known for its many Fort Patrick Henry Dam is an ideal shing over 12,000 acres of state wildlife hiking and biking trails. The Norris River management areas, that offer small destination. The reservoir is stocked with rainbow Bluff Trail is a must-see destination for trout each year, and is also good for hooking and large game and waterfowl wildower enthusiasts each spring.
  • Water Quality in Georgia 3-1

    Water Quality in Georgia 3-1

    CHAPTER 3 establish water use classifications and water quality standards for the waters of the State. Water Quality For each water use classification, water quality Monitoring standards or criteria have been developed, which establish the framework used by the And Assessment Environmental Protection Division to make water use regulatory decisions. All of Georgia’s Background waters are currently classified as fishing, recreation, drinking water, wild river, scenic Water Resources Atlas The river miles and river, or coastal fishing. Table 3-2 provides a lake acreage estimates are based on the U.S. summary of water use classifications and Geological Survey (USGS) 1:100,000 Digital criteria for each use. Georgia’s rules and Line Graph (DLG), which provides a national regulations protect all waters for the use of database of hydrologic traces. The DLG in primary contact recreation by having a fecal coordination with the USEPA River Reach File coliform bacteria standard of a geometric provides a consistent computerized mean of 200 per 100 ml for all waters with the methodology for summing river miles and lake use designations of fishing or drinking water to acreage.The 1:100,000 scale map series is the apply during the months of May - October (the most detailed scale available nationally in recreational season). digital form and includes 75 to 90 percent of the hydrologic features on the USGS 1:24,000 TABLE 3-1. WATER RESOURCES ATLAS scale topographic map series. Included in river State Population (2006 Estimate) 9,383,941 mile estimates are perennial streams State Surface Area 57,906 sq.mi.
  • Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B

    Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B

    Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B. CUMBERLAND AND TENNESSEE RIVER BASINS By PAUL R. SPEER and CHARLES R. GAMBLE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER. 1676 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 340. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Pane Abstract_____.__________-__.__-___.__------- _______---_-__-_ 1 Introduction._____________-_-__-________------_-_----_--__---_- 1 Purpose and scope______-___________-___-----__----_-_--------- 1 Acknowledgments. __-______----___-_----_--------_-_-------__- 3 Application of the method_______-__-___-____----__--_--_----_---.-_ 4 Magnitude of flood of selected frequency-_-___-____-----__---__-_ 4 Illustrative problem________-__-__-_- _____________________ 6 Mainstem streams_______________-_-_-_-_--------_---_--___-__- 6 Site flood-frequency curve______________-------__--_-_-_---_-___ 8 Maximum known floods__-___-_--__-______-__-_--------_----_---_-- 8 Miscellaneous flood data______________________________________ 10 Flood-frequency analysis._________________-_--_-_---_--_-_--__--_-- 13 Description of the area_________-__-__-_------------------------ 13 Characteristics of flood runoff._______________--__-_---_--__--___ 15 Method of analysis-_______________-__--_--_--_-_----^---_--------- 16 Flood frequency at a gaging station____________________________ 16 Records used_._________________-_-___--_----___-__-___-.__- 18 Fitting frequency graphs-____-__-_-_-_--_-._--_--------_-__- 19 Regional flood frequency.____________-___-__----__----__-_--_-- 19 Mean annual flood__.______________________________________ 19 Flood equations-________-______--__---_-----_--_-_---- 21 Composite frequency curve.
  • TRVSC Itinerary

    TRVSC Itinerary

    Tennessee River Valley EXPLORE MORE Stewardship Council America’s Tennessee River Valley W.V. IL. 77 o R i v i e h r KENTUCKY 81 O Paducah 77 75 VIRGINIA Kentucky 24 MISSOURI Dam & Lock Hopkinsville 65 Clear Creek Dam Beaver Creek Dam 55 LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES r NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Ft. Patrick Henry Dam South e Holston Dam v Boone Dam C Doakes Wilbur Dam i u 81 m Creek Dam R b Watauga e Dam ARK. r i Nashville l Norris Dam a Cherokee n Nolichucky p Dam d Dam R 40 p 155 i v e i r Douglas 26 Melton Dam s Hill DamKnoxville GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS s & Lock NATIONAL PARK i Cedar Ft. Loudoun Dam & Lock Dam TENNESSEE 40 s Tellico 40 NORTH Pin Oak Dam Great Falls Dam Dam s Beech Dam Redbud Dam i Dogwood Dam Watts Bar CAROLINA Dam & Lock M Pine Dam Lost Creek Dam Sycamore Dam 75 Fontana Dam Asheville Charlotte 40 Normandy Dam 26 24 R i v e r Apalachia 65 Dam SHILOH NATIONAL Hiwassee Dam MILITARY PARK Tims Ford Dam Ocoee #1 Dam Memphis Chickamauga Dam & Lock Ocoee #2 Dam Chatuge Dam Pickwick Landing Dam & Lock Nickajack Dam & Lock Chattanooga Ocoee #3 Dam Raccoon Nottely Dam Wheeler Mountain SOUTH Dam & Lock Pumped Blue Ridge Dam Storage CAROLINA Plant Muscle Wilson Dam Shoals & Lock Huntsville 75 e Cedar Creek Dam e 26 b Guntersville g Little Bear Creek Dam i Dam & Lock b Tupelo m y Bear Creek Dam T e n n e s s e e o a 85 T w - r e e GEORGIA e t s a s Upper Bear Creek Dam W e n 59 n e MISSISSIPPI T 55 Atlanta ALABAMA 20 20 Where River s andBirmingham Mount ains Meet | www.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 143/Thursday, July 27, 2017/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 143/Thursday, July 27, 2017/Notices

    34976 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2017 / Notices Description of Respondents: Park Frequency of Collection: One-time. Visitors; Members of the general public. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Completion Annual Number of time per Annual burden Activity number of responses response * hours * respondents each * (minute) Initial Contact ................................................................................................... 130,000 1 1 2,167 Completed VSC ............................................................................................... 65,000 1 3 3,250 Non-response Survey ...................................................................................... 6,500 1 1 108 Total .......................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 5,525 * Rounded. Estimated Annual Non-hour Burden research in System (54 U.S.C. 100701); Before including your address, phone Cost: None. National Park Service Protection number, email address, or other Research Mandate (54 U.S.C. 100702); personal identifying information in your III. Comments National Environmental Policy Act of as comment, you should be aware that On January 10, 2017, we published a amended in 1982 (Sec 102 [42 U.S.C. your entire comment—including your Federal Register notice (82 FR 3024) 4332A]). personal identifying information—may announcing that we would submit this be made publicly available at any time. Tim