DOCSLIB.ORG

Presbyterians and Mccarthyism the Anticommunist Campaign of Senator Joseph Mccarthy Prompted a National Debate on the Protection of Civil Liberties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presbyterians and Mccarthyism the Anticommunist Campaign of Senator Joseph Mccarthy Prompted a National Debate on the Protection of Civil Liberties For Truth and Liberty: Presbyterians and McCarthyism The anticommunist campaign of Senator Joseph McCarthy prompted a national debate on the protection of civil liberties. The Presbyterian Church defended the freedom of dissent. by Rick Nutt THE COLD WAR WITH THE SOVIET UNION tions, charges levelled without regard to context dominated life in the United States after and shifts in historical circumstances…and, above all, suspicion. McCarthyism describes, more- World War II. The will to stop the spread of over, a basically negative approach to the prob- communism was clear in both global and lems of communism under the pretense of patrio- domestic policies, and Presbyterians mani- tism but without concern for free government in fested that conviction along with their fel- an open society.…2 low citizens—indeed, at times Presbyterians One of the most vigorous statements of were in the midst of the conflict over com- opposition to McCarthyism was issued by munism. It was at Westminster College in the General Council of the Presbyterian Fulton, Missouri, in 1946 that Winston Church, U.S.A. (PCUSA) in 1953. This essay Churchill added the phrase “Iron Curtain” to will survey the Presbyterian response to our vocabulary. Perhaps the two most fa- McCarthy, with special attention to the mous Presbyterians of the 1950s were Dwight PCUSA’s “Letter to Presbyterians” and the Eisenhower and John Foster Dulles, presi- reaction it evoked. dent and secretary of state respectively, re- sponsible for opposing communism abroad I and at home (Dulles became famous for his resistance of communism by a policy of World War II was a watershed in the “brinksmanship”). Perhaps the most contro- United States’ role in global affairs. The versial manifestation of anticommunism was Truman Doctrine, Marshall Plan, North At- the campaign of Joseph McCarthy, Republi- lantic Treaty Organization, and Southeast can senator from Wisconsin, to stop poten- Asia Treaty Organization marked the first tial Communist subversion within the United time in peacetime that the nation had com- States. His investigative methods, which built mitted its military and economic power on innuendo and failed to protect peoples’ around the world. Those commitments stood civil liberties, drew the label “McCarthy- in singular contrast to the generally isola- ism.”1 James Smylie, writing in 1964, as- tionist foreign policy which had obtained serted that McCarthyism through U.S. history prior to the war. Yet, for all of the nation’s tremendous power and conjures to the mind legislative usurpation of judicial process, dossiers of unreliable and mis- prosperity, there was a deep sense of insecu- leading rumor, denunciations based upon un- rity. The Presbyterian Church, U.S. (PCUS) supported accusations and innocent associa- later observed: Dr. Nutt is Associate Professor of Religion at Muskingum College, New Concord, Ohio. Journal of Presbyterian History 78:1 (Spring 2000) 52 Journal of Presbyterian History For more than a century the people of the United Puritans’ conviction that they had a cov- States felt protected from international complexi- enant with God to create a righteous “city on ties by oceans and geographical distances. The a hill” that would serve as an example to the nation could choose its involvements in the affairs of the world according to its own sense of nations and lead them to embody the ideals interest. It also assumed that its cherished values of freedom, democracy, and civil liberties of freedom, opportunity, and political justice which were expressed in the Declaration of 3 were inspirational to the peoples of the world. Independence and the Constitution. This The attack on Pearl Harbor shattered that conviction, often designated “Manifest Des- sense of security, and national anxiety com- tiny,” tended to blur the lines between the pounded after the war as the Soviet Union dominant Protestant Christianity and the extended its sphere of influence and ap- nation and its policies. That is, the nation peared to foster revolution—particularly in was seen as moral and consistently altruistic the developing nations. George F. Kennan, in its motives and actions, and other nations architect of the policy of containment, as- were believed to manifest acquisitiveness serted that at the turn of the century the and selfishness. Given this bifurcated view United States’ sense of security matched that of the world that frequently drove the nation’s of ancient Rome. However, “Today that self-understanding, the U.S. often sought to pattern is almost reversed: our national con- transform the world—witness the great mis- sciousness is dominated by a sense of inse- sionary crusades at the turn of the twentieth curity greater even than that of many of the century and the decision to enter World War peoples of Western Europe who stand closer I “to make the world safe for democracy.” to, and in a position far more vulnerable to, Domestically, the nation built a history of things that are the main source of our xenophobia and, periodically, enacted leg- concern.”4 Consequently, the U.S. built up islation which restricted civil liberty in order its nuclear arsenal, reestablished the mili- to forestall perceived subversion and insur- tary draft, and embarked on an international rection (e.g., the Alien and Sedition Acts of policy of Communist containment. 1798 and the Red Scare under Attorney The search for security against threats General Mitchell Palmer following World from beyond our borders had a domestic War I).5 counterpart. President Harry Truman issued Communism was particularly abhorrent Executive Order 9835 in 1947, granting to the U.S. sense of superiority because it government agencies the right to conduct espoused an ideology in direct contradic- loyalty checks on people doing government tion to the nation’s most cherished values. work. An extensive list of organizations was First, communism as an economic system designated subversive, or potentially so. The rejected capitalism, which was seen as cen- House Un-American Activities Committee, tral to the “American Way of Life.” Indeed, originally formed before World War II to capitalism was thought to be integral to root out possible fascist infiltration, and the Christian civilization—it grew from and fos- Internal Security Act of 1951 (which re- tered democracy and self-initiative. Second, quired the Communist Party and Commu- communism was avowedly atheist; almost nist front groups to register with the govern- all in the U.S. took it as axiomatic that the ment, to identify all mailings as such, and nation’s life was founded on a commitment gave the government power to detain all to the benevolent providence of “Nature’s registered Communists in internment camps God.” Finally, communism was equated in time of national emergency, passed over with totalitarianism. This identification Truman’s veto), further expanded the power emerged particularly after the rise of fascism of the national government. in Italy and Germany between the world Anticommunism in the U.S. must be wars, so that the differences between the understood against the background of the two ideologies were deemphasized in favor nation’s self-identity. The U.S. inherited the of the similarities of the totalitarian practices Presbyterians and McCarthyism 53 they shared. The ideology of communism, Relations, asserted that “Instead of merely especially as it was incarnated in the USSR, trying to ‘stop Communism,’ we must de- was seen as a totality of social, economic, velop a strategy in such bold and creative political, and religious falsehood that op- terms that we can deal with the underlying posed everything the U.S. represented. causes of world upheaval and cure the con- Church people often referred to commu- ditions that make Communism possible.”9 nism as a religion, noting the complete view The U.S. called itself democratic, but other of life it offered and the complete allegiance countries could see political corruption, of its adherents. lynchings, poverty, and a variety of injus- Presbyterians concurred in this wide- tices in American society. Nor should the spread rejection of communism. Discus- U.S. allow the Cold War atmosphere to sions of communism by individuals or gov- destroy civil liberty. Fear could lead people erning bodies took as their beginning to “smother our essential democratic free- assumption that communism was antitheti- dom to hold and to proclaim an honest cal to both Christianity and national ideals, opinion. To label as Communists those who and should be resisted. Dulles allowed that espouse constructive change or to smear the communism had the right to its beliefs and character and demean the motives of politi- the attempt to persuade others, but “since cal opponents, are perversions of personal there is a God … no human rulers can rightly freedom.”10 use ruthless and violent methods and piti- lessly crush all within their power who do II not conform to their particular dictation.” Further, communism in the USSR was a The postwar anxiety over the spread of “total denial of tolerance” and could only be communism, with loyalty oaths and the hear- resisted by societies “imbued with strong ings of the House Un-American Activities spiritual convictions.”6 Chad Walsh argued Committee at home, heightened in 1949. In that Christians need not oppose commu- that year the USSR exploded its first atomic nism as an economic system, for economic device, ending America’s short monopoly systems in and of themselves are amoral. As on nuclear power. The civil war in China a materialist philosophy-religion and, in prac- ended with the Communists in power and tice, an imperialistic nationalism, the Chris- the Kuomintang government of Chiang Kai- tian should reject communism.7 The PCUS, shek withdrawn to the island of Formosa. in 1951 and 1954, denounced communism The Alger Hiss trial, which raised the possi- as atheistic and bent on world domination bility of espionage within the State Depart- and urged resistance of it at every turn.8 ment itself, was in the news daily.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cold War and Mccarthyism Howard Tennant
    WARS The Cold War and McCarthyism Howard Tennant 1. Work in pairs. Read the text on the Cold War and then make questions, HISTORY using the phrases in bold. The first question has been done for you. Text A The Cold War The term ‘Cold War’ is used to describe the relationship between America and the Soviet Union from 1945 to 1980. It was a period of conflict, tension and rivalry between the world’s two superpowers. (1) Neither side fought the other – the consequences would be too terrible – but they did fight for their beliefs using other countries. For example, in (2) the Vietnam war in the 1960s and 1970s, (3) South Vietnam was against the Communists and supported by America. North Vietnam was pro-Communist and fought the south (4) using weapons from communist Russia or communist China. In Afghanistan, the Americans supplied the Afghans with weapons after (5) the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979. They never physically involved themselves and so avoided direct conflict with the Soviet Union. 1. Did America and the Soviet Union fight each other? 2. When was ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________? 3. Which country did the USA ____________________________________________________________________? 4. Which countries supplied weapons ______________________________________________________________? 5. When did the Soviet Union ______________________________________________________________________? • This page has been downloaded from www.onestopclil.com. 1 of 2 Written by Howard Tennant. © Copyright Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2008. FROM WEBSITE •PHOTOCOPIABLECAN BE DOWNLOADED HISTORY 2. In pairs read this text on McCarthyism and make the questions. Text B McCarthyism (1) The term ‘McCarthyism’ refers to a period of strong anti-communist suspicion in the USA that lasted from the late 1940s to the late 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccarthyism Space and Arms Race Notes
    Name ______________ Period ___ McCarthyism New Red Scare Beginning in 1950, Joseph ________________became the most visible public face of this era of anti-communism. – The term _________________________ was coined that same year(1950) to describe and condemn the senator's methods. – McCarthyism is the practice of making ____________ of disloyalty, especially pro-Communist activities. • In many instances unsupported by ____________ or based on slight, doubtful, or irrelevant ____________. – Later the term was applied more generally to the ______-___________ of the late 1940s through the late 1950s. – Today, it is often used even more broadly, to describe __________ attacks made on a persons' ______________ and/or patriotism. McCarthy's national reconition rose after a speech where he reportedly produced a piece of paper which he claimed contained a ________ of known Communists working for the __________ Department. – McCarthy is usually quoted to have said: "I have here in my hand a list of 205 people that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the ________________ Party, and who, nevertheless, are still working and _________________ the policy of the State Department." Many people supported McCarthy because they were afraid that _______________ had indeed _________________ federal agencies. Arms Race United States v Soviet Union • 1949 -The Soviet Union exploded its _________ atomic bomb • 1953 - the United States and the Soviet Union had the ___-______ (Hydrogen bomb). • The United States _______________ the air force which would carry the _________ and built up __________ weapons. • The ___________ Union began to do the ______. • The ___________ arms __________ frightened many Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Hofstra University Model United Nations Conference
    Hofstra University Model United Nations Conference EXCOMM October, 1962 Crisis Committee Timothy Lachapelle Chairperson 1 Letter from the Chair Dear Delegates, Welcome to Hofstra Model United Nations, and the West Wing Crisis Committee. My name is Tim Lachapelle. I worked on the staff of the first HMUNC Crisis Committee, which re-created the West Wing in the post 9/11 Era. After two days of fast paced debate, and constant threat of nuclear Armageddon, the Hofstra Model UN club quickly discovered that the HMUNC delegates were up to any challenge that we throw at them. This year we are presenting another historical crisis scenario. In this committee you will all be acting as members of the Oval Office during the JFK era. The leaders of the nation are faced with many challenges during his presidency and this committee will be responsible for managing two potential crises: the first is the threat of Soviet missiles off the coast of Florida; the second is the constant threat of an attempt on the President’s life. Although this committee will rely on historical fact to solve these crises, the events will not play out exactly as they did in the history books. Some events or people involved may change depending on how the committee resolves each issue. I am currently a sophomore at Hofstra University, studying Political Science. I have been doing Model United Nations for one year. My first Model UN conference was at the University of Pennsylvania and I represented Iran in the World Health Organization. I discovered a passion for crisis committees when I worked on the staff of the crisis committee during the first Model UN conference ever hosted by Hofstra University.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuban Missile Crisis: Applying Strategic Culture to Gametheory
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2013 Cuban Missile Crisis: Applying Strategic Culture to Gametheory Chelsea E. Carattini Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Carattini, Chelsea E., "Cuban Missile Crisis: Applying Strategic Culture to Gametheory" (2013). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 236. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/236 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction Game theory applied to political situations offers a unique approach to analyzing and understanding international relations. Yet the rigid structure that lends itself so well to mathematics is not practical in the real world . It lacks a built in mechanism for determining a player's preferences, which is a key part of an international "game" or situation. Strategic culture, another international relations theory, is quite the opposite. Critics claim it suffers from a lack of structure, but it captures the spirit of international actors and what makes them tick. This paper explores the idea of pairing the two otherwise unrelated theories to bolster both in the areas where they are lacking in order to provide a more complete understanding of international states' behavior and motivations. Brief Summary of Major Theories The theories presented in the following pages are drawn from distinct schools of thought; consequently it is necessary to provide some background information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Works of Philip J. Jaffe: a Foreigner's Foray
    THE LIFE AND WORKS OF PHILIP J. JAFFE: A FOREIGNER’S FORAY INTO CHINESE COMMUNISM Patrick Nichols “…the capitalist world is divided into two rival sectors, the one in favor of peace and the status quo, and the other the Fascist aggressors and provokers of a new world war.” These words spoken by Mao Tse Tung to Philip J. Jaffe in a confidential interview. Although China has long held international relations within its Asian sphere of influence, the introduction of a significant Western persuasion following their defeats in the Opium Wars was the first instance in which China had been subservient to the desires of foreigners. With the institution of a highly westernized and open trading policy per the wishes of the British, China had lost the luster of its dynastic splendor and had deteriorated into little more than a colony of Western powers. Nevertheless, as China entered the 20th century, an age of new political ideologies and institutions began to flourish. When the Kuomintang finally succeeded in wrestling control of the nation from the hands of the northern warlords following the Northern Expedition1, it signaled a modern approach to democratizing China. However, as the course of Chinese political history will show, the KMT was a morally weak ruling body that appeased the imperial intentions of the Japanese at the cost of Chinese citizens and failed to truly assert its political legitimacy during it‟s almost ten year reign. Under these conditions, a radical and highly determined sect began to form within the KMT along with foreign assistance. The party held firmly on the idea of general welfare, but focused mostly on the rights of the working class and student nationalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Doherty, Thomas, Cold War, Cool Medium: Television, Mccarthyism
    doherty_FM 8/21/03 3:20 PM Page i COLD WAR, COOL MEDIUM TELEVISION, McCARTHYISM, AND AMERICAN CULTURE doherty_FM 8/21/03 3:20 PM Page ii Film and Culture A series of Columbia University Press Edited by John Belton What Made Pistachio Nuts? Early Sound Comedy and the Vaudeville Aesthetic Henry Jenkins Showstoppers: Busby Berkeley and the Tradition of Spectacle Martin Rubin Projections of War: Hollywood, American Culture, and World War II Thomas Doherty Laughing Screaming: Modern Hollywood Horror and Comedy William Paul Laughing Hysterically: American Screen Comedy of the 1950s Ed Sikov Primitive Passions: Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema Rey Chow The Cinema of Max Ophuls: Magisterial Vision and the Figure of Woman Susan M. White Black Women as Cultural Readers Jacqueline Bobo Picturing Japaneseness: Monumental Style, National Identity, Japanese Film Darrell William Davis Attack of the Leading Ladies: Gender, Sexuality, and Spectatorship in Classic Horror Cinema Rhona J. Berenstein This Mad Masquerade: Stardom and Masculinity in the Jazz Age Gaylyn Studlar Sexual Politics and Narrative Film: Hollywood and Beyond Robin Wood The Sounds of Commerce: Marketing Popular Film Music Jeff Smith Orson Welles, Shakespeare, and Popular Culture Michael Anderegg Pre-Code Hollywood: Sex, Immorality, and Insurrection in American Cinema, ‒ Thomas Doherty Sound Technology and the American Cinema: Perception, Representation, Modernity James Lastra Melodrama and Modernity: Early Sensational Cinema and Its Contexts Ben Singer
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 UNNEGOTIATED TRANSITION . SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME: THE PROCESSES OF DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN GREECE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Neovi M, Karakatsanis, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccarthy and Mccarthyism
    Page 83 Chapter 5 McCarthy and McCarthyism t was January, 1950 and Joseph McCarthy was upset. He had been a US Senator from Wisconsin since 1946 with little to show for the years he had been in office. He had a reputation as a drunkard, a Ibraggart, and a weak legislator who, though a Republican, often voted with the Democratic Party. But now he faced a re-election campaign with nothing he could use to stir up the electorate. But as luck would have it, while Senator McCarthy had dinner one night in January with three friends the conversation drifted to finding an issue that could help the Senator’s campaign. After discarding such subjects as the St. Lawrence Sea way and a guaranteed $100 a month pension for the retired, the subject of communism came up. Why not make a campaign issue out of the presence of known communists in the US government! The Enemy Within Armed with an issue, McCarthy approached party leaders to arrange a speaking tour. His first stop was Wheeling, West Virginia, where on February 9, 1950 McCarthy unleashed a torrent of criticism against the Democratic Party: Senator McCarthy Six years ago, there were within the Soviet orbit 180,000,000 people. Lined up on the anti-totalitarian side there were in the world at that time roughly 1,625,000,000 people. Today, there are 800,000,000 people under the absolute domination of Soviet Russia. On our side, the figure has shrunk to around 500,000,000. In other words, in less than six years the odds have changed from 9 to 1 in our favor to 8 to 5 against us.
    [Show full text]
  • Truman's Loyalty Program
    Background Essay on Truman’s Loyalty Program _____________________________________________ The Cold War emphasis on containment is often framed in terms of Truman’s foreign policy decisions: the Marshall Plan and Truman Doctrine in Europe, the Korean War in Asia. Yet containment took on a life of its own in the United States as many Americans grew more and more concerned about Communism on U.S. soil, and even more alarmingly, in government agencies. The rise of McCarthyism in the wake of this fear is well-known. Less discussed, perhaps, is the emergence of a Loyalty Program within the federal government. Truman’s Loyalty Program has its origins in World War II, particularly in the Hatch Act (1939), which forbade anyone who “advocated the overthrow of our constitutional form of government in the United States” to work in government agencies. After the war, tension with the Soviet Union grew, as did suspicion of workers in every government department. Several advisors, including Attorney General Tom Clark, urged Truman to form a loyalty program to safeguard against communist infiltration in the government. Initially, Truman was reluctant to form such a program, fearing it could threaten civil liberties of government workers. However, several factors shaped his decision to institute such a policy. Fear of communism was growing rapidly at home, and in the 1946 midterm election, Republicans gained control of Congress for the first time since 1931. To examine the issue, in November 1946 Truman created the Temporary Commission on Employee Loyalty, which stated, “there are many conditions called to the Committee’s attention that cannot be remedied by mere changes in techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War, Nuclear Weapons, and Mccarthyism E
    The Cold War, Nuclear Weapons, and McCarthyism E. America Enters World War II (1945-Present) f. Analyze the social, cultural, and economic changes at the onset of the Cold War era g. Analyze the origins of the Cold War, foreign policy developments, and major events of the administrations from Truman to present When World War II was finished, the USA, Britain, and France grew concerned. They wanted the nations of the world to accept Democracy. Yet, it was clear that Stalin wanted Eastern Europe to be dominated by Communism. Truman’s goal of “Containment” was simply to keep Communism from spreading any further into the world. Communism expanded out of the USSR. Containment failed. The Arms Race Begins -In 1949, the USSR created an atom bomb. President Truman was forced to make a stronger weapon. This started an “arms race.” -In the USA, Scientists created an “H” (hydrogen) bomb and claimed that it was over 60 times more powerful than an atom bomb. -In 1952, the USA detonated an “H” bomb. In 1953, the USSR also detonated an “H” bomb. Brinkmanship and the Eisenhower Doctrine -President Eisenhower, elected in 1952, took strong stands against Communism. In the Eisenhower Doctrine, he promised to give military aid to any Middle East nation threatened by Communism. -Secretary of state, John Dulles, claimed the only way to prevent Communism from spreading was to make the Russian USSR fear that the USA was ready to use nuclear weapons, if the time arose. -Brinkmanship is the willingness to use your most powerful weapons, at any moment, to keep your enemy afraid.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    Book Reviews Book Reviews Ellen Schrecker, Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998. 573 pp. $17.95 [paper]. Reviewed by Michael Warner, History Staff, Central Intelligence Agency Ellen Schrecker has produced a comprehensive survey of the public assault on Com- munism in America in the mid-twentieth century. Schrecker, a professor of history at Yeshiva University and the author of No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Univer- sities, knows her subject inside and out, having researched it from the most recently available documents and memoirs of those involved. The main purpose of the book is to explain the common “mechanisms, assump- tions, and institutions” of McCarthyism. That phenomenon began with the onset of World War II and lingered after Senator Joseph McCarthy’s fall. It came in several varieties: right-wing, liberal, Republican, and even left-wing versions (the latter comprising anti-Stalinist radicals and apostates from the Communist Party). All anti- Communists shared a consensus about the nature of Communism and its potential threat to American life, and they cooperated with one another to combat that threat. Many Are the Crimes shows how a relatively small number of anti-Communists became the vanguard of the movement. According to Schrecker, these writers, lawyers, and activists shared, to one degree or another, McCarthy’s “dishonesty, opportunism, and disregard for civil liberties” (p. 265). She argues that, with the institutional sup- port of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), they were able indirectly to guide the loyalty proceedings, blacklists, and other McCarthyist actions against suspected Communists in government, academia, the media, and the business world.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Context: the Red Scare and Mccarthy Trials
    Historical Context: The Red Scare and McCarthy Trials In 1950, Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible as a parallel between the Salem Witch trials and the current events that were spreading throughout the United States at the time. A similar “witch-hunt” was happening in the United States---and this time, the accused were those who were a part of the Communist Party or were Communist sympathizers. Shortly after the end of World War I, a “Red Scare” took hold of the nation. Named after the red flag of the U.S.S.R. (now Russia), the “Reds” were seen as a threat to the democracy of the United States. Fear, paranoia, and hysteria gripped the nation, and many innocent people were questioned and then jailed for expressing any view which was seen as anti-Democratic or anti-American. In June of 1940, Congress passed the Alien Registration Act, which required anyone who was not a legal resident of the United States to file a statement of their occupational and personal status, which included a record of their political beliefs. The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), which was established in 1938, had the job of investigating those who were suspected of overthrowing or threatening the democracy of the U.S. As the Alien Registration Act gathered the information, the HUAC began hunting down those who were believed to be a threat to American beliefs. The HUAC established that Communist beliefs were being spread via mass media. At this time, movies were becoming more liberal, and therefore, were believed to be a threat; many felt that Hollywood was attempting to propagandize Communist beliefs.
    [Show full text]