Proinflammatory TLR Signalling Is Regulated by a TRAF2-Dependent
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
TLR3-Dependent Activation of TLR2 Endogenous Ligands Via the Myd88 Signaling Pathway Augments the Innate Immune Response
cells Article TLR3-Dependent Activation of TLR2 Endogenous Ligands via the MyD88 Signaling Pathway Augments the Innate Immune Response 1 2, 1 3 Hellen S. Teixeira , Jiawei Zhao y, Ethan Kazmierski , Denis F. Kinane and Manjunatha R. Benakanakere 2,* 1 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19004, USA; [email protected] (H.S.T.); [email protected] (E.K.) 2 Department of Periodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19004, USA; [email protected] 3 Periodontology Department, Bern Dental School, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Present address: Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, y 541 East Canfield Ave., Scott Hall 9215, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 12 August 2020; Published: 17 August 2020 Abstract: The role of the adaptor molecule MyD88 is thought to be independent of Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) signaling. In this report, we demonstrate a previously unknown role of MyD88 in TLR3 signaling in inducing endogenous ligands of TLR2 to elicit innate immune responses. Of the various TLR ligands examined, the TLR3-specific ligand polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly I:C), significantly induced TNF production and the upregulation of other TLR transcripts, in particular, TLR2. Accordingly, TLR3 stimulation also led to a significant upregulation of endogenous TLR2 ligands mainly, HMGB1 and Hsp60. By contrast, the silencing of TLR3 significantly downregulated MyD88 and TLR2 gene expression and pro-inflammatory IL1β, TNF, and IL8 secretion. The silencing of MyD88 similarly led to the downregulation of TLR2, IL1β, TNF and IL8, thus suggesting MyD88 / to somehow act downstream of TLR3. -
A TRAF2 Binding Independent Region of TNFR2 Is Responsible for TRAF2 Depletion and Enhancement of Cytotoxicity Driven by TNFR1
www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, January, Vol. 5, No. 1 A TRAF2 binding independent region of TNFR2 is responsible for TRAF2 depletion and enhancement of cytotoxicity driven by TNFR1 Lucía Cabal-Hierro1,3, Noelia Artime1, Julián Iglesias1, Miguel A. Prado1,4, Lorea Ugarte-Gil1, Pedro Casado1,5, Belén Fernández-García1, Bryant G. Darnay2 and Pedro S. Lazo1. 1 Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular and Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias (IUOPA), Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 2 University of Texas. MD Anderson Cancer Center. Houston, Texas, USA. 3 Present address: Abramson Cancer Center. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA. USA. 4 Present address: Department of Cell Biology. Harvard Medical School. Boston, MA. USA. 5 Present address: Institute of Cancer, Barts Cancer Institute. Queen Mary University of London. London, UK Correspondence to: Pedro S. Lazo, email:[email protected] Keywords: TNF receptors; Death Receptors; TRAF2; Apoptosis; NF-kappaB Received: October 11, 2013 Accepted: November 27, 2013 Published: November 29, 2013 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) interacts with two receptors known as TNFR1 and TNFR2. TNFR1 activation may result in either cell proliferation or cell death. TNFR2 activates Nuclear Factor-kappaB (NF-kB) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) which lead to transcriptional activation of genes related to cell proliferation and survival. This depends on the binding of TNF Receptor Associated Factor 2 (TRAF2) to the receptor. -
MYD88 L265P Is a Marker Highly Characteristic Of, but Not Restricted To, Waldenstro¨M’S Macroglobulinemia
Leukemia (2013) 27, 1722–1728 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/13 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE MYD88 L265P is a marker highly characteristic of, but not restricted to, Waldenstro¨m’s macroglobulinemia C Jime´ nez1, E Sebastia´n1, MC Chillo´n1,2, P Giraldo3, J Mariano Herna´ndez4, F Escalante5, TJ Gonza´lez-Lo´ pez6, C Aguilera7, AG de Coca8, I Murillo3, M Alcoceba1, A Balanzategui1, ME Sarasquete1,2, R Corral1, LA Marı´n1, B Paiva1,2, EM Ocio1,2, NC Gutie´ rrez1,2, M Gonza´lez1,2, JF San Miguel1,2 and R Garcı´a-Sanz1,2 We evaluated the MYD88 L265P mutation in Waldenstro¨m’s macroglobulinemia (WM) and B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders by specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (sensitivity B10 À 3). No mutation was seen in normal donors, while it was present in 101/117 (86%) WM patients, 27/31 (87%) IgM monoclonal gammapathies of uncertain significance (MGUS), 3/14 (21%) splenic marginal zone lymphomas and 9/48 (19%) non-germinal center (GC) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). The mutation was absent in all 28 GC-DLBCLs, 13 DLBCLs not subclassified, 35 hairy cell leukemias, 39 chronic lymphocyticleukemias(16withM-component), 25 IgA or IgG-MGUS, 24 multiple myeloma (3 with an IgM isotype), 6 amyloidosis, 9 lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas and 1 IgM-related neuropathy. Among WM and IgM- MGUS, MYD88 L265P mutation was associated with some differences in clinical and biological characteristics, although usually minor; wild-type MYD88 cases had smaller M-component (1.77 vs 2.72 g/dl, P ¼ 0.022), more lymphocytosis (24 vs 5%, P ¼ 0.006), higher lactate dehydrogenase level (371 vs 265 UI/L, P ¼ 0.002), atypical immunophenotype (CD23 À CD27 þþFMC7 þþ), less Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable gene (IGHV) somatic hypermutation (57 vs 97%, P ¼ 0.012) and less IGHV3–23 gene selection (9 vs 27%, P ¼ 0.014). -
Expression of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factors
Expression of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor- Associated Factors (TRAFs) 1 and 2 is a Characteristic Feature of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg Cells Keith F. Izban, M.D., Melek Ergin, M.D, Robert L. Martinez, B.A., HT(ASCP), Serhan Alkan, M.D. Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois the HD cell lines. Although KMH2 showed weak Tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factors expression, the remaining HD cell lines also lacked (TRAFs) are a recently established group of proteins TRAF5 protein. These data demonstrate that consti- involved in the intracellular signal transduction of tutive expression of TRAF1 and TRAF2 is a charac- several members of the tumor necrosis factor recep- teristic feature of HRS cells from both patient and tor (TNFR) superfamily. Recently, specific members cell line specimens. Furthermore, with the excep- of the TRAF family have been implicated in promot- tion of TRAF1 expression, HRS cells from the three ing cell survival as well as activation of the tran- HD cell lines showed similar TRAF protein expres- scription factor NF- B. We investigated the consti- sion patterns. Overall, these findings demonstrate tutive expression of TRAF1 and TRAF2 in Hodgkin the expression of several TRAF proteins in HD. Sig- and Reed–Sternberg (HRS) cells from archived nificantly, the altered regulation of selective TRAF paraffin-embedded tissues obtained from 21 pa- proteins may reflect HRS cell response to stimula- tients diagnosed with classical Hodgkin’s disease tion from the microenvironment and potentially (HD). In a selective portion of cases, examination of contribute both to apoptosis resistance and cell HRS cells for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)–encoded maintenance of HRS cells. -
MYD88 and Beyond: Novel Opportunities for Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment in Waldenstro¨M’S Macroglobulinemia
Leukemia (2014) 28, 1799–1803 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/14 www.nature.com/leu CONCISE REVIEW MYD88 and beyond: novel opportunities for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment in Waldenstro¨m’s Macroglobulinemia O Landgren and N Tageja Waldenstro¨m’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare disease of the elderly with a median age of 63–68 years at diagnosis. Despite recent progress in biological insights and therapeutics, WM remains clinically challenging to diagnose and is difficult to manage with significant morbidity and lack of established curative therapies. Recently, the use of whole-genome sequencing has helped to identify a highly recurrent somatic mutation, myeloid differentiation factor 88 [MYD88] L265P in WM. This has fueled major interest in the field and as newer evidence accumulates, it is clear that that discovery of MYD88 L265P mutation may represent an important breakthrough in understanding the pathogenesis of WM and lymphoproliferative disorders. Recent scientific work in this field has also guided the identification of new targets such as CXCR4 and PI3K-delta that may have major implications in the future treatment of WM. This review discusses the role of MYD88 L265P mutations as well as targets beyond MYD88 in the setting of pathogenesis and development of future rational therapeutic trials focusing on patients diagnosed with WM. Leukemia (2014) 28, 1799–1803; doi:10.1038/leu.2014.88 INTRODUCTION transduces signals to the NF-kB transcription factors in response to Waldenstro¨m’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare hematological IL-1R1 signaling. MYD88 has a modular structure with a Toll/IL-1R malignancy with a reported age-adjusted incidence rate of 3.4 per (TIR) domain at its COOH terminus and a death domain at its 12 11 million among men and 1.7 per million among women in the NH2 terminus. -
Nuclear TRAF3 Is a Negative Regulator of CREB in B Cells
Nuclear TRAF3 is a negative regulator of CREB in B cells Nurbek Mambetsarieva,b,c,1, Wai W. Linb,1, Laura L. Stunza,d, Brett M. Hansona, Joanne M. Hildebranda,2, and Gail A. Bishopa,b,d,e,f,3 aDepartment of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; bImmunology Graduate Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; cMedical Scientist Training Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; dHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; eInternal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; and fDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Research (151), Iowa City, IA 52246 Edited by Louis M. Staudt, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, and approved December 14, 2015 (received for review July 23, 2015) The adaptor protein TNF receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3) regu- deficient T cells and macrophages lack the enhanced survival phe- lates signaling through B-lymphocyte receptors, including CD40, notype, although they display constitutive NF-κB2 activation (12, BAFF receptor, and Toll-like receptors, and also plays a critical role 13). TRAF3 degradation is neither necessary nor sufficient for B-cell inhibiting B-cell homoeostatic survival. Consistent withthesefindings, NF-κB2 activation (14). These findings indicate that TRAF3 regu- loss-of-function human TRAF3 mutations are common in B-cell cancers, lates additional important prosurvival pathways in B cells. particularly multiple myeloma and B-cell lymphoma. B cells of B-cell– Nuclear localization of TRAF3 has been reported in several specific TRAF3−/− mice (B-Traf3−/−) display remarkably enhanced sur- nonhematopoietic cell types (15, 16), but the function of TRAF3 vival compared with littermate control (WT) B cells. -
And Sepsis-Induced Lung Inflammation and Mediates Myd88
The Journal of Immunology Caveolin-1 Tyr14 Phosphorylation Induces Interaction with TLR4 in Endothelial Cells and Mediates MyD88-Dependent Signaling and Sepsis-Induced Lung Inflammation Hao Jiao,*,†,1 Yang Zhang,*,†,1 Zhibo Yan,* Zhen-Guo Wang,* Gongjian Liu,† Richard D. Minshall,*,‡ Asrar B. Malik,‡ and Guochang Hu*,‡ Activation of TLR4 by the endotoxin LPS is a critical event in the pathogenesis of Gram-negative sepsis. Caveolin-1, the signaling protein associated with caveolae, is implicated in regulating the lung inflammatory response to LPS; however, the mechanism is not understood. In this study, we investigated the role of caveolin-1 in regulating TLR4 signaling in endothelial cells. We observed that LPS interaction with CD14 in endothelial cells induced Src-dependent caveolin-1 phosphorylation at Tyr14. Using a TLR4-MD2- CD14–transfected HEK-293 cell line and caveolin-1–deficient (cav-12/2) mouse lung microvascular endothelial cells, we demon- strated that caveolin-1 phosphorylation at Tyr14 following LPS exposure induced caveolin-1 and TLR4 interaction and, thereby, TLR4 activation of MyD88, leading to NF-kB activation and generation of proinflammatory cytokines. Exogenous expression of phosphorylation-deficient Y14F caveolin-1 mutant in cav-12/2 mouse pulmonary vasculature rendered the mice resistant to LPS compared with reintroduction of wild-type caveolin-1. Thus, caveolin-1 Y14 phosphorylation was required for the interaction with TLR4 and activation of TLR4-MyD88 signaling and sepsis-induced lung inflammation. Inhibiting caveolin-1 Tyr14 phosphoryla- tion and resultant inactivation of TLR4 signaling in pulmonary vascular endothelial cells represent a novel strategy for preventing sepsis-induced lung inflammation and injury. -
TLR Signaling Pathways
Seminars in Immunology 16 (2004) 3–9 TLR signaling pathways Kiyoshi Takeda, Shizuo Akira∗ Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, and ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 3-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan Abstract Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been established to play an essential role in the activation of innate immunity by recognizing spe- cific patterns of microbial components. TLR signaling pathways arise from intracytoplasmic TIR domains, which are conserved among all TLRs. Recent accumulating evidence has demonstrated that TIR domain-containing adaptors, such as MyD88, TIRAP, and TRIF, modulate TLR signaling pathways. MyD88 is essential for the induction of inflammatory cytokines triggered by all TLRs. TIRAP is specifically involved in the MyD88-dependent pathway via TLR2 and TLR4, whereas TRIF is implicated in the TLR3- and TLR4-mediated MyD88-independent pathway. Thus, TIR domain-containing adaptors provide specificity of TLR signaling. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: TLR; Innate immunity; Signal transduction; TIR domain 1. Introduction 2. Toll-like receptors Toll receptor was originally identified in Drosophila as an A mammalian homologue of Drosophila Toll receptor essential receptor for the establishment of the dorso-ventral (now termed TLR4) was shown to induce the expression pattern in developing embryos [1]. In 1996, Hoffmann and of genes involved in inflammatory responses [3]. In addi- colleagues demonstrated that Toll-mutant flies were highly tion, a mutation in the Tlr4 gene was identified in mouse susceptible to fungal infection [2]. This study made us strains that were hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide [4]. aware that the immune system, particularly the innate im- Since then, Toll receptors in mammals have been a major mune system, has a skilful means of detecting invasion by focus in the immunology field. -
A Synthetic Cd8a:Myd88 Coreceptor Enhances
Published OnlineFirst October 20, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0653 Cancer Microenvironment and Immunology Research A Synthetic CD8a:MyD88 Coreceptor Enhances CD8þ T-cell Responses to Weakly Immunogenic and Lowly Expressed Tumor Antigens Sabina Kaczanowska1, Ann Mary Joseph1, Jitao Guo1, Alexander K Tsai1, Jackline Joy Lasola1, Kenisha Younger1, Yuji Zhang1,2, Cruz Velasco Gonzales3, and Eduardo Davila1,4 Abstract Tcell–based immunotherapies are a promising approach for and Toll-like receptor signaling-related proteins. CD8a: patients with advanced cancers. However, various obstacles MyD88–expressing T cells improved antitumor responses in limit T-cell efficacy, including suboptimal T-cell receptor mice. Enhanced antitumor activity was associated with a (TCR) activation and an immunosuppressive tumor environ- unique tumor cytokine/chemokine signature, improved T-cell ment. Here, we developed a fusion protein by linking CD8a infiltration, reduced markers of T-cell exhaustion, elevated þ and MyD88 (CD8a:MyD88) to enhance CD8 T-cell levels of proteins associated with antigen presentation, and responses to weakly immunogenic and poorly expressed fewer macrophages with an immunosuppressive phenotype in tumor antigens. CD8a:MyD88–engineered T cells exhibited tumors. Given these observations, CD8a:MyD88 represents a increased proliferation and expression of effector and costi- unique and versatile approach to help overcome immunosup- mulatory molecules in a tumor antigen–dependent manner. pression and enhance T-cell responses to tumor antigens. These effects were accompanied by elevated activation of TCR Cancer Res; 77(24); 7049–58. Ó2017 AACR. Introduction ciated macrophage (6) and Th2 cytokine accumulation hamper antitumor T-cell responses. Moreover, chronic exposure to factors T cell–based immunotherapies are one of the most promising in the TME induces the expression of receptors that foster T-cell treatments for patients with advanced cancers, including melano- exhaustion, such as Tim-3, Lag-3, and PD-1 (7). -
Induced IFN Regulatory Factor 1 Transcription Factor by Myd88 in Toll-Like Receptor-Dependent Gene Induction Program
Evidence for licensing of IFN-␥-induced IFN regulatory factor 1 transcription factor by MyD88 in Toll-like receptor-dependent gene induction program Hideo Negishi*, Yasuyuki Fujita*, Hideyuki Yanai*, Shinya Sakaguchi*, Xinshou Ouyang*, Masahiro Shinohara†, Hiroshi Takayanagi†, Yusuke Ohba*, Tadatsugu Taniguchi*‡, and Kenya Honda* *Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; and †Department of Cell Signaling, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan Contributed by Tadatsugu Taniguchi, August 18, 2006 The recognition of microbial components by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) In the present study we investigated how IFN-␥-induced IRF1 initiates signal transduction pathways, which trigger the expression contributes to TLR-mediated signaling. We demonstrate that of a series of target genes. It has been reported that TLR signaling is IRF1 forms a complex with MyD88, similar to the case of IRF4, enhanced by cytokines such as IFN-␥, but the mechanisms underlying IRF5, and IRF7. We also provide evidence that IRF1 induced this enhancement remain unclear. The MyD88 adaptor, which is by IFN-␥ is activated by MyD88, which we refer to as ‘‘licensing,’’ essential for signaling by many TLRs, recruits members of the IFN and migrates rapidly into the nucleus to mediate an efficient regulatory factor (IRF) family of transcription factors, such as IRF5 and induction of IFN-, iNOS, and IL-12p35. Our study therefore IRF7, to evoke the activation of TLR target genes. In this study we revealed that IRF1 is a previously unidentified member of the demonstrate that IRF1, which is induced by IFN-␥, also interacts with multimolecular complex organized via MyD88 and that the IRF1 and is activated by MyD88 upon TLR activation. -
Crystallographic Analysis of CD40 Recognition and Signaling by Human TRAF2
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 8408–8413, July 1999 Biochemistry Crystallographic analysis of CD40 recognition and signaling by human TRAF2 SARAH M. MCWHIRTER*, STEVEN S. PULLEN†,JAMES M. HOLTON*, JAMES J. CRUTE†,MARILYN R. KEHRY†, AND TOM ALBER*‡ *Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3206, and †Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT 06877-0368 Communicated by Peter S. Kim, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, May 26, 1999 (received for review April 25, 1999) ABSTRACT Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily proteins (8, 9). The biological selectivity of signaling also relies members convey signals that promote diverse cellular re- on the oligomerization specificity and receptor affinity of the sponses. Receptor trimerization by extracellular ligands ini- TRAFs. tiates signaling by recruiting members of the tumor necrosis The TNF receptor superfamily member, CD40, mediates factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) family of adapter diverse responses. In antigen-presenting cells that constitu- proteins to the receptor cytoplasmic domains. We report the tively express CD40, it plays a critical role in T cell-dependent 2.4-Å crystal structure of a 22-kDa, receptor-binding fragment immune responses (10). TRAF1, TRAF2, TRAF3, and of TRAF2 complexed with a functionally defined peptide from TRAF6 binding sites in the 62-aa, CD40 cytoplasmic domain the cytoplasmic domain of the CD40 receptor. TRAF2 forms have been mapped (7, 11). TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 bind a mushroom-shaped trimer consisting of a coiled coil and a to the same sequence, 250PVQET, and TRAF6 binds to the unique -sandwich domain. Both domains mediate trimer- membrane-proximal sequence, 231QEPQEINF. -
Cell Type-Specific Function of TRAF2 and TRAF3 in Regulating Type I IFN
Xie et al. Cell Biosci (2019) 9:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-018-0268-5 Cell & Bioscience RESEARCH Open Access Cell type‑specifc function of TRAF2 and TRAF3 in regulating type I IFN induction Xiaoping Xie1, Jin Jin2, Lele Zhu1, Zuliang Jie1, Yanchuan Li1, Baoyu Zhao3, Xuhong Cheng1, Pingwei Li3 and Shao‑Cong Sun1,4* Abstract Background: TRAF3 is known as a central mediator of type I interferon (IFN) induction by various pattern recognition receptors, but the in vivo function of TRAF3 in host defense against viral infection is poorly defned due to the lack of a viable mouse model. Results: Here we show that mice carrying conditional deletion of TRAF3 in myeloid cells or dendritic cells do not have a signifcant defect in host defense against vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection. However, whole-body inducible deletion of TRAF3 renders mice more sensitive to VSV infection. Consistently, TRAF3 was essential for type I IFN induction in mouse embryonic fbroblasts (MEFs) but not in macrophages. In dendritic cells, TRAF3 was required for type I IFN induction by TLR ligands but not by viruses. We further show that the IFN-regulating function is not unique to TRAF3, since TRAF2 is an essential mediator of type I IFN induction in several cell types, including mac‑ rophages, DCs, and MEFs. Conclusions: These fndings suggest that both TRAF2 and TRAF3 play a crucial role in type I IFN induction, but their functions are cell type- and stimulus-specifc. Keywords: TRAF2, TRAF3, Type I interferon, Antiviral immunity Background IPS-1) serves as an adaptor of RLRs, whereas stimulator Type I interferon (IFN) plays a crucial role in innate of interferon gene (STING) mediates type I IFN induc- immunity against viral infections [1, 2].