DOCSLIB.ORG

Reef Growth and Maintenance WAMSI Kimberley Marine Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Reef Growth and Maintenance Lindsay B Collins1,3, Alexandra Stevens1,3, Mick O’Leary 2,3, Giada Bufarale 1,3, Moataz Kordi 1,3, Tubagus Solihuddin 1,3 1Department of Applied Geology, Western Australian School of Mines, Curtin University, Perth, Western, Australia 2Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Perth, Western, Australia 3Western Australian Marine Science Institution (WAMSI), Perth, Western Australia, Australia WAMSI Kimberley Marine Research Program Report Project 1.3.1 June 2016 Reef Growth and Maintenance WAMSI Kimberley Marine Research Program Initiated with the support of the State Government as part of the Kimberley Science and Conservation Strategy, the Kimberley Marine Research Program is co-invested by the WAMSI partners to provide regional understanding and baseline knowledge about the Kimberley marine environment. The program has been created in response to the extraordinary, unspoilt wilderness value of the Kimberley and increasing pressure for development in this region. The purpose is to provide science based information to support decision making in relation to the Kimberley marine park network, other conservation activities and future development proposals. Ownership of Intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Western Australian Marine Science Institution and Curtin University. Copyright © Western Australian Marine Science Institution All rights reserved. Unless otherwise noted, all material in this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en) Legal Notice The Western Australian Marine Science Institution advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. This information should therefore not solely be relied on when making commercial or other decision. WAMSI and its partner organisations take no responsibility for the outcome of decisions based on information contained in this, or related, publications. Front cover images (L-R) Image 1: Satellite image of the Kimberley coastline (Landgate) Image 2: Getting ready to lift core PN5, with assistance from Bardi Jawi Rangers. (Image: Tubagus Solihuddin) Image 3: Humpback whale breaching (Image: Pam Osborn) Image 4: Getting ready for coring with help from Bardi Jawi Rangers and Erin McGinty from KMRS. (Image: Tubagus Solihuddin) Reef Growth and Maintenance Year of publication: 2016 Metadata: http://catalogue.aodn.org.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/metadata.show?uuid=7ab491d2-9507-428c-aed1- 091d2aaed521 Citation: Collins et al (2015). Final Report of Project 1.3.1 of the Kimberley Marine Research Program Node of the Western Australian Marine Science Institution, WAMSI, Perth, Western Australia, 246pp. Author Contributions: LC was project leader, fieldwork co-leader for the 2013 seismic fieldwork and provided technical advice, AS compiled milestone reports, managed project data, provided logistic support, technical advice and assistance and participated in the 2013 seismic fieldwork. MO was fieldwork co-leader for the 2013 fieldwork and fieldwork leader for the 2014 coring fieldwork and provided technical advice. MK undertook spatial analysis of satellite imagery and orthophotography of the Kimberley Bioregion, created the geodatabase, ReefKIM and participated in the 2013 and 2014 fieldwork. GB undertook analysis of the seismic profiles collected during the 2013 field work, assisted with report compilation, provided logistic support and participated in the 2013 fieldwork. TS undertook analysis of the Cockatoo Island minepit data and the cores collected during the 2014 fieldwork and participated in the 2013 and 2014 fieldwork. Corresponding author and Institution: M O'Leary ([email protected]), Department of Applied Geology, Western Australian School of Mines, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia. Funding Sources: This project was funded by the Western Australian Marine Science Institution Joint Venture Partners as part of the WAMSI Kimberley Marine Research Program, a $30M program with seed funding of $12M provided by State government as part of the Kimberley Science and Conservation Strategy. Competing Interests: The commercial investors and data providers had no role in the data analysis, data interpretation, the decision to publish or in the preparation of the manuscript. The authors have declared that no competing interests exists. Kimberley Traditional Owner agreement: This research was enabled by the Traditional Owners through their advice, participation and consent to access their traditional lands. Acknowledgements: This study is part of the Kimberley Reef Geomorphology Project 1.3.1 which has been funded by the Western Australian State Government through the Western Australian Marine Science Institution (WAMSI). We are grateful to Traditional Owners of the Kimberley land (the Bardi Jawi, Mayala and Dambimangari people) for their assistance, advice and consent to access their traditional lands. We also wish to thank the following: The Kimberley Marine Research Station, in particular Erin McGinty and James Brown, for providing vessels and logistic and in kind support for marine operations and access to research facilities; WA Museum, in particular Clay Bryce and Zoe Richards for providing advice and ground truth data through the WA Museum/Woodside Collection Project (Kimberley) 2008 – 2011; Kimberley Media for providing quality site pictures; The Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) for providing VHR orthophotographs and HR satellite images; Mark Hardman (Fugro Satellite Positioning Pty Ltd) for supplying the DGPS; Neil MacDonald (AAEngineering Ltd) and Western Advance for the equipment support; Giovanni De Vita for his technical advice; Pluton Resources (particularly Jeremy Bower and Anson Griffith) are thanked for providing access to parts of their Cockatoo Island Mining Tenement and for logistic support during the study; David Blake from MScience for fieldwork assistance; MScience is thanked for providing access to marine video of the reef; Geoscience Australia (GA) for providing DEMs and GIS data; The United States Geological Survey (USGS) for providing Landsat images; The Geological Survey of Western Australia (GSWA) for providing digital geological maps. Finally, it must be noted that this research was completed in an area where the Traditional Owners have a rich cultural history of climate, land and environment based on thousands of years of habitation. It is important to consider that broad understanding alongside the modern science presented here. Collection permits/ethics approval: No collection occurred in the production of this report. Reef Growth and Maintenance Contents TABLE OF FIGURES TABLE OF TABLES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... I IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................. I 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA ...............................................................................................................................................1 1.2 STUDY SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................2 1.3 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................3 Project Objectives and Activities .......................................................................................................3 Timeline of events .............................................................................................................................3 2 PROJECT ESTABLISHMENT........................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES COMMENCED ...........................................................................................4 2.2 PROJECT ACTIVITIES .....................................................................................................................................4 Establishment of a Coral Reef geodatabase .....................................................................................4 Map of Islands and Reef Distribution ...............................................................................................5 Seabed & bathymetric maps in GIS compatible format ...................................................................5 Preliminary morphologic classification of the reefs of the Kimberley Region ..................................6 Sea-level curve and drowning history for the Kimberley Region ......................................................6 Drowning Model ...............................................................................................................................8 2.3 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................9
Recommended publications
  • St George's Academy Geography OCR B

    St George's Academy Geography OCR B

    St George’s Academy Geography OCR B REVISION BOOKLET – Distinctive Landscapes Name: _______________________ Class teacher: _____________Tutor Group ______ PERSONAL LEARNING CHECKLIST The first thing to do whenever you start revising is to find out what you know and what you aren’t as confident on. Complete the table below by shading or ticking the correct ranking for your confidence level. 1 = Not confident at all 4 = Really confident and I can prove it! Distinctive Landscapes 1 2 3 4 1. What are the key words? 2. What is a distinctive landscape? 3. What are the upland and lowland landscapes like in the UK? 4. How does geology influence the landscape of the UK? 5. How does climate influence the landscape of the UK? 6. How does human activity influence the landscape of the UK? 7. What are the geomorphic processes that affect the UK landscape? 8. What coastal landforms are caused by erosion? 9. What coastal landforms are caused by deposition? 10. What is coastal management? 11. Coastal Case Study – Hunstanton – Norfolk Coastline 12. What is a river basin? 13. What features are found along a river’s long profile? 14. River Case Study – River Tees Once you have this grid completed you will have a good idea of where you will want to focus your revision. The following booklet will help you in all areas but you will want to focus more on the areas where you are less confident in your extra revision slots Task 1 – What are the Key Words? Abrasion Aquifer Arch Attrition Backwash Bay Beach Beach nourishment Biological weathering Abrasion Aquifer
  • STAFF WORKING PAPER SUMMARY of SELECTED PEARL HARBOR MARINE NATURAL RESOURCES DATA from 1999 – 2015 - in SUPPORT of PROPOSED PROJECT P 516 Prepared by Stephen H

    STAFF WORKING PAPER SUMMARY of SELECTED PEARL HARBOR MARINE NATURAL RESOURCES DATA from 1999 – 2015 - in SUPPORT of PROPOSED PROJECT P 516 Prepared by Stephen H

    1 STAFF WORKING PAPER SUMMARY OF SELECTED PEARL HARBOR MARINE NATURAL RESOURCES DATA FROM 1999 – 2015 - IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED PROJECT P 516 Prepared by Stephen H. Smith Marine Ecologist SSC Scientific Diving Services March 18, 2015 Introduction Overview. The objective of this Staff Working Paper is to summarize selected data gathered by the author between 1999 and February 2015. During that time period, the author conducted a variety of assessments throughout Pearl Harbor and the Pearl Harbor Entrance Channel. The specific resources which will be addressed in this partial summary are: 1) corals, 2) selected fin fish species and Essential Fish Habitat (EFH), 3) sea turtles, 4) miscellaneous and 5) perceived data gaps. This summary is not intended to reiterate material already presented in the Pearl Harbor INRMP or the many other documents which contain pertinent marine natural resource data; it is intended to summarize unpublished and/or unreported data gathered by the author. In this document, Pearl Harbor is defined as the area north of Hammer Point, as designated on Nautical Chart No. 19366 (Oahu South Coast Pearl Harbor). The Pearl Harbor Entrance Channel (PHEC) is defined as the area south of Hammer Point between the channel markers on the eastern and western sides of the PHEC and extending to the outermost Channel Marker Buoys (No. 1 on the west side and No. 2 on the east side). Figure 1 illustrates the boundaries of the P 516 project assessment area. All the data summarized in this document was gathered by the author, with periodic biological support from Donald Marx, and others.
  • Spatially Distinct and Regionally Endemic Symbiodinium Assemblages in the Threatened Caribbean Reef-Building Coral Orbicella Faveolata

    Spatially Distinct and Regionally Endemic Symbiodinium Assemblages in the Threatened Caribbean Reef-Building Coral Orbicella Faveolata

    Coral Reefs (2015) 34:535–547 DOI 10.1007/s00338-015-1277-z REPORT Spatially distinct and regionally endemic Symbiodinium assemblages in the threatened Caribbean reef-building coral Orbicella faveolata Dustin W. Kemp • Daniel J. Thornhill • Randi D. Rotjan • Roberto Iglesias-Prieto • William K. Fitt • Gregory W. Schmidt Received: 28 October 2014 / Accepted: 19 February 2015 / Published online: 27 February 2015 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Abstract Recently, the Caribbean reef-building coral Or- with species of Symbiodinium in clades A (type A3), B (B1 bicella faveolata was listed as ‘‘threatened’’ under the U.S. and B17), C (C3, C7, and C7a), and D (D1a/Symbiodinium Endangered Species Act. Despite attention to this species’ trenchii). Within-colony distributions of Symbiodinium conservation, the extent of geographic variation within O. species correlated with light availability, cardinal direction, faveolata warrants further investigation. O. faveolata is and depth, resulting in distinct zonation patterns of en- unusual in that it can simultaneously harbor multiple ge- dosymbionts within a host. Symbiodinium species from netically distinct and co-dominant species of endosymbiotic clades A and B occurred predominantly in the light-exposed dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium. Here, we inves- tops, while species of clade C generally occurred in the tigate the geographic and within-colony complexity of shaded sides of colonies or in deeper-water habitats. Fur- Symbiodinium-O. faveolata associations from Florida Keys, thermore, geographic comparisons of host–symbiont asso- USA; Exuma Cays, Bahamas; Puerto Morelos, Mexico; and ciations revealed regional differences in Symbiodinium Carrie Bow Cay, Belize. We collected coral samples along associations.
  • 5. Phys Landscapes Student Booklet PDF File

    5. Phys Landscapes Student Booklet PDF File

    GCSE GEOGRAPHY Y9 2017-2020 PAPER 1 – LIVING WITH THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION C PHYSICAL LANDSCAPES IN THE UK Student Name: _____________________________________________________ Class: ___________ Specification Key Ideas: Key Idea Oxford text book UK Physical landscapes P90-91 The UK has a range of diverse landscapes Coastal landscapes in the UK P92-113 The coast is shape by a number of physical processes P92-99 Distinctive coastal landforms are the result of rock type, structure and physical P100-105 processes Different management strategies can be used to protect coastlines from the effects of P106-113 physical processes River landscapes in the UK P114-131 The shape of river valleys changes as rivers flow downstream P114-115 Distinctive fluvial (river) landforms result from different physical processes P116-123 Different management strategies can be used to protect river landscapes from the P124-131 effects of flooding Scheme of Work: Lesson Learning intention: Student booklet 1 UK landscapes & weathering P10-12 2 Weathering P12-13 3 Coastal landscapes – waves & coastal erosion P14-16 4 Coastal transport & deposition P16-17 5 Landforms of coastal erosion P17-21 6 Landforms of coastal deposition P22-24 7 INTERVENTION P24 8 Case Study: Swanage (Dorset) P24-25 9 Managing coasts – hard engineering P26-28 10 Managing coasts – soft engineering P28-30 11 Managed retreat P30-32 12 Case Study: Lyme Regis (Dorset) P32-33 13 INTERVENTION P33 14 River landscapes P34-35 15 River processes P35-36 16 River landforms P36-41 17 Case Study:
  • General Coastal Notes + Landforms! 1

    General Coastal Notes + Landforms! 1

    General Coastal Notes + Landforms! 1 Types of Coastlines: Type Description Primary Coast which is essentially in the same condition when sea level stabilized Coastline after the last ice age, “younger”. They are created by erosion (the wearing away of soil or rock), deposition (the buildup of sediment or sand) or tectonic activity (changes in the structure of the rock and soil because of earthquakes). River deltas are an example of a primary coast. They form where a river deposits soil and other material as it enters the sea. Secondary Coastline shaped primarily by marine forces or marine organisms, and wave Coastline energy is the main agent shaping the coastline. Emergent Emergent coastlines are stretches along the coast that have been exposed by Coastline the sea due to a relative fall in sea levels. Submergent Submergent coastlines are stretches along the coast that have been Coastline inundated by the sea due to a relative rise in sea levels. Concordant A coastline consisting of bands of rock, which run parallel to the coast. Coastline Discordant A discordant coastline occurs where bands of differing rock type run Coastline perpendicular to the coast. Factors affecting Wave Energy: Factor: Description Wind Speed Wind speed will in turn affect wind energy, which determines the size of the waves. Higher wind speed = Higher wind energy = Larger waves Fetch Fetch is the distance of the ocean which the wind blows over, Longer distance = Larger waves Wind How long the wind has blown in the same direction (steady winds at slower Duration
  • Landscapes and Processes

    Landscapes and Processes

    Relief of the UK Highland Processes How a river’s cross profile changes downstream. (upland) areas, The relief (height of often over 600 Transportation - The movement of sediment along the coast Erosion - The breakdown of sediment into smaller fragments Deposition - When waves loose energy they leave behind the The long profile of a river shows the change in height of the river’s the land) of the UK metres above smaller pieces. bed from its source to its mouth. It is typically concave, decreasing in gradient downstream. can be divided into sea level; e.g. • Managing Distinctive Landscapes: The cross profile shows the shape of the river valley. uplands and the Scottish Traction - large material is rolled along the sea floor. Hydraulic Action – The force of water into cracks helps to break Highlands it up. lowlands; each have Brecon Beacons: (glaciated Middle course their own • Saltation - beach material is bounced along the sea Abrasion – Waves fling sand and pebbles against the rock. • Establish fixed point photography of key viewpoints mountains). characteristics. floor. These wear away like sandpaper. and animals Upper course • Improve sinage by renewing or replacing finger posts Lower course • Suspension - beach material is suspended and carried Attrition - Chunks of rock get knocked together and worn into to encourage people to stick to the routes. Key Lowland areas, by the waves. smaller bits • Designated footpaths and Monitoring of footpath under 200 erosion metres above • Solution - material is dissolved and carried by the Solution – Water dissolves the soluble material from the rock. • Work with local planning and housing authorities to Lowlands sea level, water.
  • Coral Bleaching Response Plan - GBRMPA 1

    Coral Bleaching Response Plan - GBRMPA 1

    Coral Bleaching Response Plan - GBRMPA 1 Executive Summary Climate change poses a multitude of threats to reefs but the increased frequency and severity of coral bleaching events is among the most pressing (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2007). To meet the challenge of responding to coral bleaching events, the Climate Change Group at the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) developed a Coral Bleaching Response Plan (the Response Plan) in 2002, as part of a response to the bleaching event that occurred in the late summer (February and March) of that year. Since then, the Climate Change Group has coordinated implementation of the Response Plan each summer – December to March – and has reviewed and refined it annually. The Plan outlines a strategic approach for monitoring bleaching risk and responding to coral bleaching events when they occur, and has four components. Within this document, the objectives of each of the four primary components are outlined and described in detail: 1. Early Warning System 2. Incident Response 3. Management Actions 4. Communication Strategy The Plan includes related routine and responsive tasks. When Early Warning System tools predict bleaching, monitoring network participants ground-truth these predictions and report to managers. Managers and researchers confirm reports of bleaching by conducting site inspections that determine the level of response required under the Incident Response (IR) component of the Plan (based on Australian standard incident response protocols). Thresholds for response levels (1, 2, or 3) in the IR are based on the severity of bleaching impacts as well as the spatial extent of the event. More detailed monitoring during IR enables detailed reporting on reef condition and the severity of bleaching impacts, and works to target management actions.
  • Saint Lucia Coral Reef Report Card 2016.Pdf

    Saint Lucia Coral Reef Report Card 2016.Pdf

    Saint Lucia Coral Reef Report Card 2016 Eastern Caribbean Coral Reef Report Cards Barbuda 6 PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES 3 224,813 SQUARE KM OF OCEAN 22 AREAS DESIGNATED SINCE 1973 St. Kitts 44 Nevis Antigua 526 SQUARE KM OF OCEAN # of Marine 50 AREAS PROPOSED Managed Areas SQUARE KM OF OCEAN # of MMAs 990 proposed The 2016 Coral Reef Report Cards The Eastern Caribbean Seascape is an arc of islands linked through diverse coral reef ecosystems, oceanic currents, migratory pathways and a rich cultural heritage. The Eastern Caribbean Coral Reef Report Cards are a series of individual reports for the 6 participating countries and provide an easy-to-understand summary of the state of 2 the region’s marine resources. The Report Cards collate data from 277 comparable coral reef surveys and map in detail 383 km2 of coral reefs, 19 km2 of mangrove, 286 km2 of seagrass, 44 designated and 50 proposed Marine Managed Areas (MMA). Dominica The Report Cards provide an initial baseline on the current state of the reef and identify gaps. Reporting this type of information will help track progress in protecting reefs and inform future monitoring and management. The vision is to produce report cards every 2 years and share data through the CaribNode regional spatial data platform. Future report cards will include key socioeconomic and management effectiveness information. Each Report Card includes information on: • Key Habitats (location and extent of coral, mangrove, seagrass) 9 • Reef Health Index (a measure of the health of four key coral reef indicators) • Marine Managed Areas (size and location of designated and proposed areas) Saint Lucia The Framework To protect the region’s marine biodiversity, it is essential to St.
  • Coral Reef Ecology and Biodiversity in Watamu Marine National Park, Kenya

    Coral Reef Ecology and Biodiversity in Watamu Marine National Park, Kenya

    Coral Reef Ecology and Biodiversity in Watamu Marine National Park, Kenya A Rocha Kenya Conservation & Science Report by Benjamin Cowburn1, Robert D Sluka2 and Joy Smith3 1A Rocha Kenya and Oxford University, UK 2 A Rocha Kenya 3 Current address: University of Bremen, Marine Zoology Department, Bremen, Germany — Occasional Research Report #27 — January 2013 A ROCHA KENYA | P.O. BOX 383 | WATAMU 80202 [email protected] | WWW.AROCHA.ORG | TEL: +254 (0) 202 335 865 Abstract Watamu Marine National Park is a 10 km2 marine protected area located on the central coast of Kenya. The biodiversity and abundance of fish and corals was studied in order to assess IUCN Red List species presence in the park and gain an understanding of distribution among several of the main coral reef sites. Ten species of fish and one species of coral were found that are assessed as Vulnerable or Threatened and four species that are Data Deficient. The highest coral cover was seen at Uyombo with 31% and the lowest at Turtle Reef (15%) . In terms of coral community composition, Coral Gardens and Bennett’s Reef were dominated by massive Porites colonies, whereas Uyombo and Turtle Reef had a more balanced coral composition with notably more Acropora and Pocillopora. Both Bennett’s Reef/Coral Gardens and Uyombo reefs had a similar size class distribution of fish, the mode falling in the 10-20cm size class. Both reefs were also dominated by surgeonfish, wrasse and parrotfish. We recommend a focus for future research on elasmobranchs (sharks, rays, guitarfish) and other IUCN Red Listed species.
  • Dynamics of Stony Coral and Octocoral Juvenile Assemblages Following Disturbance on Patch Reefs of the Florida Reef Tract

    Dynamics of Stony Coral and Octocoral Juvenile Assemblages Following Disturbance on Patch Reefs of the Florida Reef Tract

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Marine Science Faculty Publications College of Marine Science 2018 Dynamics of Stony Coral and Octocoral Juvenile Assemblages Following Disturbance on Patch Reefs of the Florida Reef Tract Lucy A. Bartlett University of South Florida, [email protected] Vanessa I. P. Brinkhuis Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Wildlife Research Institute Rob R. Ruzicka Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Wildlife Research Institute Michael A. Colella Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Wildlife Research Institute Kathleen S. Lunz Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Wildlife Research Institute See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/msc_facpub Part of the Life Sciences Commons Scholar Commons Citation Bartlett, Lucy A.; Brinkhuis, Vanessa I. P.; Ruzicka, Rob R.; Colella, Michael A.; Lunz, Kathleen S.; Leone, Erin H.; and Hallock, Pamela, "Dynamics of Stony Coral and Octocoral Juvenile Assemblages Following Disturbance on Patch Reefs of the Florida Reef Tract" (2018). Marine Science Faculty Publications. 1230. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/msc_facpub/1230 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Marine Science at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marine Science Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Lucy A. Bartlett, Vanessa I.
  • As a Wave Reaches the Beach: Less Resistant) Run the Water Running up the Beach Is Called the Swash

    As a Wave Reaches the Beach: Less Resistant) Run the Water Running up the Beach Is Called the Swash

    Discordant Coastline: Waves Waves are caused by friction that is generated when wind Headlands and Bays Caves, Arches and Stacks What other processes change our coastlines? blows across the surface of the sea! Bands of differing rock strengths (resistant and Headland Sub-aerial As a wave reaches the beach: less resistant) run The water running up the beach is called the swash. As the wave loses perpendicular (in the Caves, arches and stacks Water enters cracks, and in cold climates, freezes, energy, the water begins to run back down the beach to the sea, and is opposite direction) to the often form at headlands, expanding by around 10%. This increased pressure called the backwash. If you’ve ever been to the beach, you will have felt this coastline. Along this should make sure you Mechanical weakens the cliff face. This process repeats, until motion under your feet when paddling in the shallow waters! coastline, a mixture of clay remember how headlands (freeze thaw) the rock is weak enough to fragment. In warmer initially form! Two types of waves! (less resistant), chalk and climates, the salt crystals of the sea expand when they dry, resulting in a similar process. limestone (resistant) run Akraberg Headland, Scotland Destructive Waves: Strong winds, perpendicular to the Rain water contains a chemical called carbonic powerful waves and cause coastal erosion. coastline. Cave They are tall and steep. The backwash is acid, which when comes into contact with certain Concordant Coastline: Bands of rock run parallel to the coastline. Along Chemical stronger than the swash, so material is Destructive waves break rocks such as limestone, can react and weaken the this coastline, limestone (resistant rock) runs along the entire length of carried out to sea.
  • UK Evolving Physical Landscape and Coasts Memory Organiser

    UK Evolving Physical Landscape and Coasts Memory Organiser

    UK Evolving Physical Landscape WAVES Cliffs UK Evolving Physical Landscape As a wave reaches the beach: Cliffs are produced through the process of hydraulic action and and Coasts The water running up the beach is called the swash. As the wave loses abrasion, where destructive waves erode the cliff between the high and energy, the water begins to run back down the beach to the sea, and is Memory Organiser low tide marks to create a wave cut notch. As this notch is eroded, the called the backwash. Human impact on the UK physical landscape‐DARTMOOR, cliff above becomes unstable, collapses and is removed by waves. Two types of waves! Devon Wave Cut Platform Human Evidence on the landscape Destructive Waves: Strong winds, powerful Activity waves and cause coastal erosion. They are Below the wave cut notch, an • Clearance of woodland to allow grazing tall and steep. The backwash is stronger area of exposed rock is left, which is visible during low Agricult • Dry stone walls called ‘reaves’ were made to divide up than the swash, so material is carried out tide. The surface is not ure – the land for farming purposes. Remains still present to sea. Tees‐Exe Line smooth, as erosional Farming today. Constructive Waves: Light winds, not processes such as abrasion, Settlem • Circular stone hut remains from the Bronze Age, 3,000 powerful and cause deposition, rather and weathering, continue to ents years ago found scattered across the moorland than erosion. Stronger swash, so material erode the rock face. • Dry river beds in the landscape are a result of tin is carried up the beach and deposited.