Surface Mesohighs and Mesolows
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lecture Notes on Marine Meteorology
Lecture notes on Marine Meteorology By Shri S. P. Joshi Assistant. Meteorologist Office of DDGM (WF) India Meteorological Department Pune-5 Preface The aim of these lecture notes is to provide training to the marine observers in handling and maintenance of meteorological instruments and collect meteorological observations in the form of logbooks. The chapters included in these lecture notes are from the Basic and Intermediate training courses of the department. The present lecture notes are merely a collection of information available on Internet and are compiled from various WMO sites, freely available, keeping in view the up-and-coming trends and new technological advancements. This collection is for private circulation for trainees of Basic and Intermediate training courses of the department and the author do not intend to violate copyrights of anybody what so ever. Port Meteorological Officers in the immediate future have to deal with the modernization of the marine equipments and automation of Marine Data collection, its transmission and archival by observing minimum quality control through the in-built software like TURBOWIN. These lecture notes will also be useful to Port Meteorological Officers in understanding the nature of work of PMOs and will provide them the useful guidelines. A separate chapter on installation of Turbowin is also included in these notes. S. P. Joshi. 9th April 2005. Gudhi Padva Table of contents Chapter no Contents Page no. 1 WMO Voluntary Observing Ships’ Scheme 1 2 Meteorological Instrumentation on board ships 8 3 Port Meteorological Office ( PMO ) 15 4 The Ship Weather Code 19 5 Broadcast of weather bulletins for Merchant shipping 24 6 Broadcast of weather bulletins for Indian navy 28 7 Warnings to Ports and Storm Warning Signals 30 8 Broadcast of weather warnings for fishermen through 34 All India Radio. -
P4.6 Observations from the 13 April 2004 Wake Low Damaging Wind Event in South Florida
P4.6 OBSERVATIONS FROM THE 13 APRIL 2004 WAKE LOW DAMAGING WIND EVENT IN SOUTH FLORIDA Robert R. Handel and Pablo Santos NOAA/NWS, Miami, Florida 1. INTRODUCTION of April 12th persisted across the Florida Straits. This boundary exhibited pseudo-warm frontal characteristics, Damaging winds affected portions of South Florida and was lifting northward over South Florida (white during the early morning of April 13, 2004. These winds dashed line in Fig. 1). To the north of the boundary, a occurred behind a large area of stratiform precipitation cool and stable surface layer was present over land. associated with a mesoscale convective system (MCS) A high amplitude longwave mid/upper tropospheric that moved across the southeastern Gulf of Mexico trough was located over the eastern United States. The during the evening of April 12, 2004 (Fig. 1). Wind axis of this trough extended from the Great Lakes speeds sustained between 30 and 50 mph with gusts southward to the central Gulf of Mexico while South reaching 76 mph were recorded on Lake Okeechobee. Florida was upstream of the ridge axis located near These winds produced a seiche effect on Lake 65°W longitude. In addition, a 130-knot (67 m s-1) polar Okeechobee, resulting in a 5.5 ft maximum water level jet and 60-knot (31 m s-1) subtropical jet were splitting differential between the north and south sides of this over the Gulf of Mexico and South Florida producing shallow lake (Fig. 8). In addition, damage from the high significant upper level diffluence over South Florida. -
Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications
United States Office of Air Quality EPA-454/R-99-005 Environmental Protection Planning and Standards Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 February 2000 Air EPA Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications Air Q of ua ice li ff ty O Clean Air Pla s nn ard in nd g and Sta EPA-454/R-99-005 Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Air and Radiation Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 February 2000 DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ii PREFACE This document updates the June 1987 EPA document, "On-Site Meteorological Program Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications", EPA-450/4-87-013. The most significant change is the replacement of Section 9 with more comprehensive guidance on remote sensing and conventional radiosonde technologies for use in upper-air meteorological monitoring; previously this section provided guidance on the use of sodar technology. The other significant change is the addition to Section 8 (Quality Assurance) of material covering data validation for upper-air meteorological measurements. These changes incorporate guidance developed during the workshop on upper-air meteorological monitoring in July 1998. Editorial changes include the deletion of the “on-site” qualifier from the title and its selective replacement in the text with “site specific”; this provides consistency with recent changes in Appendix W to 40 CFR Part 51. -
To Marine Meteorological Services
WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION Guide to Marine Meteorological Services Third edition PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS PUBLICATION IS GOING TO BE UPDATED BY END OF 2010. WMO-No. 471 Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization - Geneva - Switzerland 2001 © 2001, World Meteorological Organization ISBN 92-63-13471-5 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE FOR NOTING SUPPLEMENTS RECEIVED Supplement Dated Inserted in the publication No. by date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONTENTS Page FOREWORD................................................................................................................................................. ix INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1 — MARINE METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES ........................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Requirements for marine meteorological information....................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 -
Chapter 3 Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather
CHAPTER 3 JOHNSON AND MAPES Chapter 3 Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather RICHARD H. JOHNSON Department of Atmospheric Science. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado BRIAN E. MAPES CIRESICDC, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado REVIEW PANEL: David B. Parsons (Chair), K. Emanuel, J. M. Fritsch, M. Weisman, D.-L. Zhang 3.1. Introduction tion, mesoscale phenomena occur on horizontal scales between ten and several hundred kilometers. This Severe convective weather events-tornadoes, hail range generally encompasses motions for which both storms, high winds, flash floods-are inherently mesoscale ageostrophic advections and Coriolis effects are im phenomena. While the large-scale flow establishes envi portant (Emanuel 1986). In general, we apply such a ronmental conditions favorable for severe weather, pro definition here; however, strict application is difficult cesses on the mesoscale initiate such storms, affect their since so many mesoscale phenomena are "multiscale." evolution, and influence their environment. A rich variety For example, a -100-km-Iong gust front can be less of mesocale processes are involved in severe weather, than -1 km across. The triggering of a storm by the ranging from environmental preconditioning to storm initi collision of gust fronts can actually occur on a ation to feedback of convection on the environment. In the -lOO-m scale (the microscale). Nevertheless, we will space available, it is not possible to treat all of these treat this overall process (and others similar to it) as processes in detail. Rather, we will introduce s~veral mesoscale since gust fronts are generally regarded as general classifications of mesoscale processes relatmg to mesoscale phenomena. -
1 Jp2.2 a Case Study of a Wake Low in Northern Illinois And
JP2.2 A CASE STUDY OF A WAKE LOW IN NORTHERN ILLINOIS AND THE WRF PREDICTION OF THE WAKE LOW William Wilson * National Weather Service, Chicago, Illinois Erik Janzon Northern Illinois University We ran four test runs. At 06 UTC A wake low occurred in northern Illinois initialization time one run was using an and southern Wisconsin, during the 11.7 km grid spacing and the other run morning of May 30, 2008. The surface using a 3.4 km grid spacing. At 12 UTC wind was 45 to 55 mph (22 to 28 m/s) initialization, one run was using a 11.7 with gusts to 65 mph (33 m/s). The wind km grid spacing and the other run was was not forecasted or expected. using a 3.4 km grid spacing. The time Forecasters had to quickly issue wind period of the WRF model runs were a 15 warnings as the strong wind was hour run with initialization at 06 UTC occurring. We hope to find ways to and a 12 hour model run with predict wake lows of this strength so to initialization at 12 UTC. We wanted to give forecasters some lead time or investigate the initialization effects on anticipation of wake low development. the wake low production, and the effect The Weather Research and Forecasting of grid spacing. The 3.4 km grid spacing (WRF), Advanced Research WRF model run was without the Kain and (ARW) model is used as a local Fritch convective scheme (Kain and operational model at the National Fritsch, 1990). -
Synoptic Conditions Favorable for the Formation of the 15 July 1995 Southeastern Canada/Northeastern U.S
SYNOPTIC CONDITIONS FAVORABLE FOR THE FORMATION OF THE 15 JULY 1995 SOUTHEASTERN CANADA/NORTHEASTERN U.S. DERECHO EVENT Mace L. Bentley Climatology Research Laboratory Department of Geography The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia Abstract On 15 July 1995, a derecho-producing mesoscale convective system inflicted considerable damage through southeastern Canada and the northeastern U.S. The synoptic-scale environ ment that precluded and persisted during this event is examined \ using swface and upper-air observations, satellite imagery v""--- and numerical model data. Evidence suggests that low-level ~~- - . -,.~ .... moisture inflow and forcing were major factors in initiating \ .-..... ~".... ". and sustaining this progressive warm season derecho event. : "?-.,. ~.:"... Favorable upper-level dynamics produced by jet streak induced Kingston. Ontario circulations were also found over the region. Products from ..------------.:t i the Eta model run initialized 12 hours prior to the event were ". used in the study to fill in between the 0000 UTC and 1200 UTC upper-air sounding times. Manipulation of these data sets was accomplished using GEMPAK 5.2.1. Calculation of 850 hPa moisture transport vectors andfrontogenesis were found to be particularly useful in determining the derecho producing mesoscale convective system's genesis and propagation regions. Future investiga tions of these systems should employ these techniques in order to assess their forecast applications. Fig. 1. Approximate track of the DMCS cloud shield on 15 July 1995. 1. Introduction In the early morning hours of 15 July 1995, a derecho producing mesoscale convective system (hereafter, DMCS) moved from southern Canada through the northeastern United States (Fig. 1). Widespread wind damage was reported through out the Northeast. -
Factors Affecting Surface Wind Speeds in Gravity Waves and Wake Lows
1664 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 24 Factors Affecting Surface Wind Speeds in Gravity Waves and Wake Lows TIMOTHY A. COLEMAN AND KEVIN R. KNUPP Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama (Manuscript received 16 December 2008, in final form 14 April 2009) ABSTRACT Ducted gravity waves and wake lows have been associated with numerous documented cases of ‘‘severe’’ winds (.25 m s21) and wind damage. These winds are associated with the pressure perturbations and transient mesoscale pressure gradients occurring in many gravity waves and wake lows. However, not all wake lows and gravity waves produce significant winds nor wind damage. In this paper, the factors that affect the surface winds produced by ducted gravity waves and wake lows are reviewed and examined. It is shown theoretically that the factors most conducive to high surface winds include a large-amplitude pressure dis- turbance, a slow intrinsic speed of propagation, and an ambient wind with the same sign as the pressure perturbation (i.e., a headwind for a pressure trough). Multiple case studies are presented, contrasting gravity waves and wake lows with varying amplitudes, intrinsic speeds, and background winds. In some cases high winds occurred, while in others they did not. In each case, the factor(s) responsible for significant winds, or the lack thereof, are discussed. It is hoped that operational forecasters will be able to, in some cases, compute these factors in real time, to ascertain in more detail the threat of damaging wind from an approaching ducted gravity wave or wake low. 1. Introduction However, as demonstrated by Loehrer and Johnson (1995), many wake lows do not produce significant winds. -
JO 7900.5D Chg.1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7900.SD CHANGE CHG 1 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy Effective Date: 11/29/2017 SUBJ: JO 7900.SD Surface Weather Observing 1. Purpose. This change amends practices and procedures in Surface Weather Observing and also defines the FAA Weather Observation Quality Control Program. 2. Audience. This order applies to all FAA and FAA-contract personnel, Limited Aviation Weather Reporting Stations (LAWRS) personnel, Non-Federal Observation (NF-OBS) Program personnel, as well as United States Coast Guard (USCG) personnel, as a component ofthe Department ofHomeland Security and engaged in taking and reporting aviation surface observations. 3. Where I can find this order. This order is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air traffic/publications and on the MyFAA employee website at http://employees.faa.gov/tools resources/orders notices/. 4. Explanation of Changes. This change adds references to the new JO 7210.77, Non Federal Weather Observation Program Operation and Administration order and removes the old NF-OBS program from Appendix B. Backup procedures for manual and digital ATIS locations are prescribed. The FAA is now the certification authority for all FAA sponsored aviation weather observers. Notification procedures for the National Enterprise Management Center (NEMC) are added. Appendix B, Continuity of Service is added. Appendix L, Aviation Weather Observation Quality Control Program is also added. PAGE CHANGE CONTROL CHART RemovePa es Dated Insert Pa es Dated ii thru xi 12/20/16 ii thru xi 11/15/17 2 12/20/16 2 11/15/17 5 12/20/17 5 11/15/17 7 12/20/16 7 11/15/17 12 12/20/16 12 11/15/17 15 12/20/16 15 11/15/17 19 12/20/16 19 11/15/17 34 12/20/16 34 11/15/17 43 thru 45 12/20/16 43 thru 45 11/15/17 138 12/20/16 138 11/15/17 148 12/20/16 148 11/15/17 152 thru 153 12/20/16 152 thru 153 11/15/17 AppendixL 11/15/17 Distribution: Electronic 1 Initiated By: AJT-2 11/29/2017 JO 7900.5D Chg.1 5. -
Conventional Wisdom
COVERSTORY n October 2006, following a series of a mesoscale convective system near the The study of convection deals with fatal crashes, the U.S. National Trans- equator. More recently, the fatal crash of vertical motions in the atmosphere portation Safety Board (NTSB) issued a medical helicopter in March 2010 in caused by temperature or, more pre- a safety alert describing procedures Brownsville, Tennessee, U.S., was related cisely, density differences. The adage Ipilots should follow when dealing with to a “mesoscale convective system with a “warm air rises” is well known. In “thunderstorm encounters.” Despite bow shape.”1 meteorological parlance, a parcel of air these instructions, incidents continued to To improve the warning capabilities will rise if it is less dense than air in the occur. One concern is that terminology of the various weather services, convec- surrounding environment. Warmer air often used by meteorologists is unfamil- tion has been studied extensively in is less dense and will rise. Conversely, iar to some in the aviation community. recent years, leading to many new dis- colder air, being denser, will sink. As For example, the fatal crash of the Hawk- coveries. Although breakthroughs in the pilots, especially glider pilots, know, you er 800A at Owatonna, Minnesota, U.S., science have increased our understanding don’t need moisture — that is, clouds — in June 2008 (ASW, 4/11, p. 16) involved and improved convection forecasts, the to have rising and sinking currents of a “mesoscale convective complex.” The problem of conveying the information to air. However, when air rises it expands crash of Air France Flight 447 in June those who need it remains, complicated and cools. -
A Quick Reference Guide for Operational Forecasting Papers
A QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE FOR OPERATIONAL FORECASTING PAPERS John D. Gordon NWS/Warning & Forecast Office Old Hickory, Tennessee I. INTRODUCTION There has been a cornucopia of operational forecasting papers written on a wide variety of topics in recent years. It is very arduous for the operational forecaster to keep track of scattered binders, pamphlets, journals, and notebooks of meteorological and hydrological papers and studies within the individual's office. This is the first revision of the paper that was originally published as Central Region TSP 98-01. Due to many requests, the manuscript now has been consolidated to include both hyperlinked texts and non-hyperlinked texts. Many topics have been expanded, such as CSI, MCS, tornadoes, and the WSR-88D. In addition, many new topics, such as microphysics, dynamic cooling, gust fronts, and several case studies have been added. This guide will help fill the gap for the operational forecaster by indexing the various topics by season and author. Older rules of thumb and techniques were included, such as the Magic Chart (Chaston 1989), Forecasting Ground Blizzards (Van Ess 1985), and Improving Over MOS Guidance (Hendrickson 1983). Additional references are included on newer operational techniques, such as Estimating the VIL of the Day (Wilken 1994), Heavy Rain Forecasting Techniques (Funk, 1993), and Rotational Shear Nomograms (Falk, 1998). II. SOURCES OF INFORMATION Scientific Services Divisions (SSD) from Central, Eastern, Southern, and Western regions provided indices for all Technical Attachments (TA), Applied Research Papers (ARP), and Technical Memoranda (TM) for the last 10 years. In addition, various internet home pages were perused, both civilian and military, for more material. -
Results of Detailed Synoptic Studies of Squall Lines
Results of Detailed Synoptic Studies of Squall Lines By TETSUYA FUJITA, Kyushu Institute of Technology and University of Chicago1 (Manuscript received June IS, 1955) Abstract A system of synoptic analysis on a mesometeorological scale has been developed through the combined use of space and time sections applied to all regular and special stations in an area joo by 900 mi. in the Central United States. Two periods of development of large thunderstorm areas are analyzed. In both of these periods tornadoes occurred. The synoptic model of a squall line in this scale involves three principal features of the pressure field-the pressure surge, the thunderstorm high and the wake depression. Another feature, called the tornado cyclone, accompanies tornado funnels. Divergence values of 10 to 60. IO-~sec -l over areas of 100 to 10,000 sq. mi. are measured. The mesosynoptic disturbances greatly influence the situation as viewed on the regular synoptic scale, which is about 10times the meso-scale, and make conven- tional analysis hopelessly difficult. I. Introduction stations in Ohio operated by the U.S. Weather Severe storms such as thunderstorms, hail, Bureau’s Cloud Physics Project in 1948, high wind, and tornadoes usually occur in close WILLIAMS(1948) studied the microstructure of relation to disturbances with linear dimensions the squall-lines. In this chart the microstructure of 10 to IOO miles. The analysis dealing with of the pressure and temperature systems is well this scale is termed mesoanalysis. The term represented by the five-minute intervalanal sis. “mesometeorology” has been used in studies TEPPER(1950) stuhed the microstructure o the “ r of radar meteorology by SWINGLE(1953) and pressure jump” line traversing the area of the others.