World Heritage Cultural Landscapes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Heritage Cultural Landscapes LANDSCAPE STEWARDSHIP: NEW DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND CULTURE Mechtild Ršssler World Heritage Cultural Landscapes he International Convention for the Protection of the World’s Cul- tural and Natural Heritage, often referred to as the World Heritage Convention, was adopted by the General Conference of the United TNations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1972. This international treaty established a unique interna- tional instrument for recognizing and protecting both the cultural and natural heritage of outstanding universal value. It was not until 1992, however, that this Convention became the first international legal instrument to protect cultural landscapes. In December 1992 the World tion with and in response to its Heritage Committee adopted three natural environment. Such land- categories of cultural landscapes to scapes reflect that process of be integrated into their operational evolution in their form and com- guidelines. ponent features. They fall into two subcategories: 1. The most easily identifiable is • A relict (or fossil) landscape is the clearly defined landscape de- one in which an evolutionary signed and created intentionally process came to an end at by humans. This embraces gar- some time in the past, either den and parkland landscapes abruptly or over a period of constructed for aesthetic reasons time. Its significant distin- which are often (but not always) guishing features are, how- associated with religious or other ever, still visible in material monumental buildings and en- form. sembles. • A continuing landscape is one 2. The second category is the or- which retains an active social ganically evolved landscape. This role in contemporary society results from an initial social, eco- closely associated with the nomic, administrative, or relig- traditional way of life, and in ious imperative and has devel- which the evolutionary proc- oped its present form by associa- ess is still in progress. At the 27 The George Wright Forum 17(1), 1. © 2000 The George Wright Society, Inc. All rights reserved. LANDSCAPE STEWARDSHIP: NEW DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND CULTURE same time it exhibits signifi- assist with comparative studies of cant material evidence of its cultural landscapes and development evolution over time. of a thematic framework to assist the 3. The final category is the associa- World Heritage Committee with the tive cultural landscape. The in- evaluation of cultural landscape clusion of such landscapes on the nominations. A number of regional World Heritage List is justifiable and thematic expert meetings have by virtue of the powerful relig- been held on cultural landscapes and ious, artistic or cultural associa- related issues in the context of an tions of the natural element overall global strategy for a repre- rather than material cultural evi- sentative and balanced World Heri- dence, which may be insignifi- tage List: cant or even absent. • International Expert Meeting on These revisions to the World “Cultural Landscapes of Out- Heritage Committee operational standing Universal Value” guidelines were based on recom- (Germany, October 1993) mendations prepared by an expert • Expert Meeting on Routes as meeting, held in La Petite Pierre in Part of the Cultural Heritage France in October 1992. The World (Spain, November 1994) Heritage Committee adopted the • Heritage Canals (Canada, Sep- revisions to the cultural criteria with tember 1994) the intention of including excep- • Asia-Pacific Workshop on Asso- tional outstanding cultural land- ciative Cultural Landscapes scapes on the World Heritage List. (Australia, April 1995) With this decision, the World Heri- • Asian Rice Culture and its Ter- tage Convention became the first in- raced Landscapes (regional the- ternational legal instrument to iden- matic study meeting, Philippi- tify, protect, conserve, and transmit nes, March–April 1995) to future generations cultural land- • Expert Meeting on European scapes of outstanding universal Cultural Landscapes of Out- value. standing Universal Value (Aus- An Action Plan for the Future was tria, April 1996) adopted by the World Heritage • Expert Meeting on Cultural Committee in December 1993, Landscapes of the Andean Re- based on the recommendations of an gion (Peru, May 1999) international expert meeting on cul- • Expert Meeting on Cultural tural landscapes held in Germany in Landscapes in Africa (Kenya, October 1993. This plan recom- March 1999) mended regional expert meetings to • Expert Meeting on Cultural 28 The George Wright FORUM LANDSCAPE STEWARDSHIP: NEW DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND CULTURE Landscapes in Eastern Europe landscapes were also addressed and (Poland, September–October examples of outstanding cultural 1999) landscapes discussed, which illus- trated the general landscape catego- These expert meetings have ries in the regions. Many discussions served as milestones in the imple- among experts from all regions of the mentation of the World Heritage world also gave consideration to the Convention by assisting States Par- need to recognize the associative val- ties in recognizing and nominating ues of landscapes and landscape cultural landscapes for inclusion on features for indigenous people and to the World Heritage List (e.g., Figure the importance of protecting biologi- 1). Methodologies for identifying cal and cultural diversity within cul- cultural landscapes were developed tural landscapes. and suggestions made towards the In December 1993 at its seven- classification and evaluation of cul- teenth session, the World Heritage tural landscapes. Specific legal, man- Committee inscribed Tongariro Na- agement, socioeconomic, and con- tional Park in New Zealand as the servation issues related to cultural first cultural landscape on the World Figure 1. Vernazza, one of the five villages that make up the Cinque Terre, Italy—a cultural landscape on the World Heritage List. Photograph by Linas Sinkevicius. Volume 17 • Number 1 2000 29 LANDSCAPE STEWARDSHIP: NEW DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND CULTURE Heritage List. The site was already owners, the A n angu Aboriginal peo- included on the List in recognition of ple (Figure 2). Following the regional its outstanding natural values and thematic study meeting on Asian had been resubmitted as an associa- Rice Culture and its Terraced Land- tive landscape under the revised cri- scapes, the Rice Terraces of the teria for cultural properties. The Philippine Cordilleras were included mountains of Tongariro National as an exceptional example of a 2,000- Park have cultural and religious sig- year-old tradition forming a land- nificance for the Maori people and scape of great beauty. Table 1 lists symbolize the spiritual links between the 16 cultural landscapes currently the people and their environment. In inscribed on the List. 1994, another cultural landscape was It is evident that the World Heri- added. Ulu r u Kata-Tjuta National tage Convention can serve as a cata- Park in Australia was inscribed as lyst for the recognition and protec- both a living and an associative cul- tion of the world’s diverse land- tural landscape of the traditional scapes. Even though only a selection Figure 2. The 1994 inscription of Ulu r u Kata-Tjuta National Park as a cultural landscape gives universal recognition to its cultural significance to the A n angu people of central Australia. 30 The George Wright FORUM LANDSCAPE STEWARDSHIP: NEW DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND CULTURE Cultural Landscape Year of Country Inscription Tongariro National Park 1993 New Zealand Ulu r u-Kata Tjuta National Park 1994 Australia The Rice Terraces of the Philippine 1995 Philippines Cordilleras Lednice-Valtice Cultural Landscape 1996 Czech Republic The Sintra Cultural Landscape 1996 Portugal Hallstatt-Dachstein / Salzkammergut 1997 Austria Cultural Landscape Pyrenees Mount Perdu Patrice de 1997 France/Spain Belfon The Costiera Amalfitana 1997 Italy Portovenere, Cinque Terre, and the 1997 Italy Islands (Palmaria, Tino, and Tinetto) Cilento and Vallo di Diano National 1998 Italy Park with the Archeological Sites of Paestum and Velia, and the Certosa di Padula Quadi Quadisha (the Holy Valley) and 1998 Lebanon the Forest of the Cedars of God (Horsh Arz el-Rab) Vinales Valley 1999 Cuba Jurisdiction of Saint-Emilion 1999 France Hortobagy National Park 1999 Hungary Sukur Cultural Landscape 1999 Nigeria Kalwaria Zebrzydowskaÿ: The 1999 Poland Mannerist Architectural and Park Landscape Complex and Pilgrimage Park Table 1. Cultural landscapes currently inscribed on the World Heritage List of landscapes can be inscribed on the perience in implementing the World World Heritage List, the interna- Heritage Convention, the UNESCO tional recognition of this type of World Heritage Centre provided property enhances protection by advice to the Council of Europe on other means, including stimulating the preparation of a European Land- additional regional and national scape Convention. The World protection. For example, with its ex- Heritage Committee welcomed this Volume 17 • Number 1 2000 31 LANDSCAPE STEWARDSHIP: NEW DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND CULTURE initiative by the Council of Europe and extensive cultural site was exem- and encourages other regional and plary, innovative, and appropriate. national efforts that serve heritage However, several delegates raised conservation. concerns about the nuclear power The adoption of the revised crite- plant located within the boundaries ria for the inclusion
Recommended publications
  • 10 Years of the World Heritage Volunteers Initiative
    Empowering Youth for Heritage 10 YEARS OF THE WORLD HERITAGE VOLUNTEERS INITIATIVE NIO M O UN IM D R T IA A L • P • W L O A I R D L D N H O E M R I E TA IN G O E • PATRIM United Nations World Sustainable Educational, Scientific and Heritage Development Cultural Organization Convention Goals 1 Empowering Youth for Heritage 10 YEARS OF THE WORLD HERITAGE VOLUNTEERS INITIATIVE NIO M O UN IM D R T IA A L • P • W L O A I R D L D N H O E M R I E TA IN G O E • PATRIM United Nations World Sustainable Educational, Scientific and Heritage Development Cultural Organization Convention Goals Published in 2020 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France © UNESCO, 2020 ISBN: 978-92-3-100383-7 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco. org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Symbol of Global Protec- 7 1 5 4 5 10 10 17 5 4 8 4 7 1 1213 6 JAPAN 3 14 1 6 16 CHINA 33 2 6 18 AF Tion for the Heritage of All Humankind
    4 T rom the vast plains of the Serengeti to historic cities such T 7 ICELAND as Vienna, Lima and Kyoto; from the prehistoric rock art 1 5 on the Iberian Peninsula to the Statue of Liberty; from the 2 8 Kasbah of Algiers to the Imperial Palace in Beijing — all 5 2 of these places, as varied as they are, have one thing in common. FINLAND O 3 All are World Heritage sites of outstanding cultural or natural 3 T 15 6 SWEDEN 13 4 value to humanity and are worthy of protection for future 1 5 1 1 14 T 24 NORWAY 11 2 20 generations to know and enjoy. 2 RUSSIAN 23 NIO M O UN IM D 1 R I 3 4 T A FEDERATION A L T • P 7 • W L 1 O 17 A 2 I 5 ESTONIA 6 R D L D N 7 O 7 H E M R 4 I E 3 T IN AG O 18 E • IM 8 PATR Key LATVIA 6 United Nations World 1 Cultural property The designations employed and the presentation 1 T Educational, Scientific and Heritage of material on this map do not imply the expres- 12 Cultural Organization Convention 1 Natural property 28 T sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of 14 10 1 1 22 DENMARK 9 LITHUANIA Mixed property (cultural and natural) 7 3 N UNESCO and National Geographic Society con- G 1 A UNITED 2 2 Transnational property cerning the legal status of any country, territory, 2 6 5 1 30 X BELARUS 1 city or area or of its authorities, or concerning 1 Property currently inscribed on the KINGDOM 4 1 the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention
    WHC. 12/01 July 2012 Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANISATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE The Operational Guidelines are periodically revised to reflect the decisions of the World Heritage Committee. Please verify that you are using the latest version of the Operational Guidelines by checking the date of the Operational Guidelines on the UNESCO World Heritage Centre Web address indicated below. The Operational Guidelines (in English and French), the text of the World Heritage Convention (in five languages), and other documents and information concerning World Heritage are available from the World Heritage Centre: UNESCO World Heritage Centre 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel : +33 (0)1 4568 1876 Fax : +33 (0)1 4568 5570 E-mail : [email protected] Links : http://whc.unesco.org/ http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines (English) http://whc.unesco.org/fr/orientations (French) ii Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Paragraph number number(s) ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS I. INTRODUCTION I.A The Operational Guidelines 1-3 I.B The World Heritage Convention 4-9 I.C The States Parties to the World Heritage Convention 10-16 I.D The General Assembly of States Parties to the World 17-18 Heritage Convention I.E The World Heritage Committee 19-26 I.F The Secretariat to the World Heritage Committee (the 27-29 World Heritage Centre) I.G The Advisory Bodies to the World Heritage Committee: 30-37 ⋅ ICCROM 32-33 ⋅ ICOMOS 34-35 ⋅ IUCN 36-37 I.H Other organizations 38 I.I Partners in the protection of World Heritage 39-40 I.J Other Conventions, Recommendations and Programmes 41-44 II.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Holistic Paradigm and the Sustainability of Historic Cities in Spain: an Approach Based on the World Heritage Cities
    sustainability Article The New Holistic Paradigm and the Sustainability of Historic Cities in Spain: An Approach Based on the World Heritage Cities Joaquín Martínez Pino ID Department of Art History, Geography and History Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), C/Senda del Rey, 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-913-987881 Received: 14 May 2018; Accepted: 29 June 2018; Published: 3 July 2018 Abstract: Linked to the objectives of sustainability of the United Nations, the reflection on the historic city promoted by UNESCO has favored the emergence of a new holistic paradigm that focuses on the capacity of culture to improve the quality of life of people and seeks to recover the historical link among culture, development and sustainability. Based on this context, this paper analyzes the main problems that face Spanish World Heritage Cities in terms of sustainability and livability, and the correlation between the new paradigm and the reality of its current management. This study explored sustainability indicators based on the evolution of the population and the number of visitors. The current protection and management model is reviewed based on the four basic tools identified by UNESCO: Regulatory systems, Knowledge and Planning tools, Financial tools and Civic engagement tools. The joint analysis of UNESCO’s Periodic Reports allows us to identify the shortcomings that point to a disconnection between heritage city management and citizenship. After analyzing the impact of the new paradigm in the Spanish reality, the need to continue deepening its dissemination and accelerating its implementation is evident. In the same way.
    [Show full text]
  • Download an Explorer Guide +
    PORTOVENERE ITALY he ancient town of Portovenere looks T as if a brilliant impressionist painting has come to life. This romantic sentiment may not have been shared by those defending or assaulting the town over the past 1,000 years. However, today it can be said with relative cer- tainty that there is little chance of an attack by the Republic of Pisa, Saracen pirates, barbaric hordes or French Emperors. In other words, relax, have fun and enjoy your day in lovely, peaceful Portovenere. HISTORY With a population a little over 4,000, Portovenere is a small, Portovenere was founded by the Romans in the 1st century medieval town. It was built and defended by the Republic of Ge- BC. Known as Portus Veneris, it was built upon a promon- noa for nearly 800 years. This hilly point of land stretches north tory which juts out into the sea. As the empire slowly disinte- along the coast of the famous “Cinque Terre”. The town’s near- grated, Portovenere came under the eventual control of the est neighbor is the city of La Spezia, just east, around the cor- Byzantines. King Rothari of the Germanic Lombards took ner of the “Gulf of Poets”. So named for the great writers who the town, along with much of rest of Italy, the in the mid- praised, loved, lived and died in this beautiful region of Liguria, 600s. if they are somehow lost in time, Petrarch and Dante, Percy The struggle between the great Maritime Republics of Ge- Shelley and Lord Byron will forever be remembered here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of War: the Protection of Cultural Property During the "Siege" of Sarajevo (1992-95)
    DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 14 Issue 1 Special Section: Art and War, 2004 Article 5 The Art of War: The Protection of Cultural Property during the "Siege" of Sarajevo (1992-95) Megan Kossiakoff Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip Recommended Citation Megan Kossiakoff, The Art of War: The Protection of Cultural Property during the "Siege" of Sarajevo (1992-95), 14 DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L. 109 (2004) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol14/iss1/5 This Case Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kossiakoff: The Art of War: TheCOMMENT Protection of Cultural Property during the "S THE ART OF WAR: THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY DURING THE "SIEGE" OF SARAJEVO (1992-95) I. INTRODUCTION Throughout the night of August 25, 1992, shells from Serb gunners fell on the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Sarajevo. The attack set off a blaze fueled by a collection representing hundreds of years of Bosnian history and culture. Librarians and community members, risking sniper fire, formed a human chain to move books to safety.' Despite emergency efforts, ninety percent of the collection was ash by daybreak.2 Unfortunately, this incident was not unique. The destruction of cultural artifacts during the "Siege" of Sarajevo was a loss not only to Bosnia,3 but also to the heritage of the world which now suffers a gap that cannot be closed.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage Under Attack
    World Heritage under Attack by Dr. Graciela Gestoso Singer* I dedicated this article to Dr. Monica Hanna**, a young Egyptologist, who is working very hard –together with other volunteers- to protect "our Heritage". The World Heritage Convention is not the only international tool that UNESCO has made available to support conservation. In fact, since its inception in the aftermath of the Second World War, UNESCO has given life to several conventions in the field of cultural heritage conservation, reflecting the growing concern of the international community for conservation, a concern justified by the threats and destruction – voluntary and involuntary – that have taken place in the past and are witnessed every day. The conventions are: a) 1954 Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (Hague Convention), and its Protocols of 1992 and 1999; b) 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Cultural Property; c) 1972 Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage; d) 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage; e) 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage; and f) 2005 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. As part of UNESCO activities in support of heritage conservation during conflicts and in post-conflict situations, the World Heritage Convention has played a significant role in safeguarding sites. World Heritage sites have often been the target of military action, looters and poachers in the lawless situations created by conflict. Following the intentional destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan (Afghanistan), in 2003 the General Conference of UNESCO adopted a Declaration Concerning the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage (Hladik, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Document on the Impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage Properties”
    18/06/2021 Information meeting on the updating of the “Policy Document on the impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage properties” Remarks by Mr. Ernesto Ottone R. UNESCO Assistant Director-General for Culture - Information Meeting - 30 June – 10 July 30 June – 10 July Updating43rd session of the of the Policy World DocumentHeritage Committee, on the Baku, impacts Republic of ofclimate change on World Heritage properties 18 June 2021 Azerbaijan 2019 2019 1 Updating of the “Policy Document on the impacts of Climate Change on World Heritage properties” Background and Process Ms. Mechtild Rössler Director, UNESCO World Heritage Centre - Information Meeting - 30 June – 10 July 30 June – 10 July Updating43rd session of the of the Policy World DocumentHeritage Committee, on the Baku, impacts Republic of ofclimate change on World Heritage properties 18 June 2021 Azerbaijan 2019 2019 2 1 18/06/2021 2005 20062007 2008 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Climate Change impacts on World Heritage brought to the attention of the World Heritage Committee by concerned organizations and individuals (petitions) ► Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal) ► Huascaran National Park (Peru) ► Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System (Belize) ► Great Barrier Reef (Australia) - Information Meeting - 30 June – 10 July 30 June – 10 July Updating43rd session of the of the Policy World DocumentHeritage Committee, on the Baku, impacts Republic of ofclimate change on World Heritage properties 18 June 2021 Azerbaijan 2019 2019 3 20052006 2007 2008 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 March 2006: Working
    [Show full text]
  • (AWHF) at the 43Rd WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE in BAKU, AZERBAIJAN 2019
    THE AFRICAN WORLD HERITAGE FUND (AWHF) AT THE 43rd WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE IN BAKU, AZERBAIJAN 2019 1. ONE SITE FROM AFRICA IS INSCRIBED ON THE UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE LIST: THE ANCIENT FERROUS METTALLURGY SITES FROM BURKINA FASO Minister of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Innovation, Hon. Professor Alkassoum Maiga celebrates the announcement of the inscription of Burkina Faso’s Ancient Ferrous Metallurgy Sites on the Unesco World Heritage List ©AWHF During the 43rd World Heritage Committee in Baku, Azerbaijan, Burkina Faso represented Africa by being the only African country to have a site inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List. The announcement was made on 5th July in the presence of the Permanent Delegate of Burkina Faso to Unesco, His Excellency Mr. Alain Francis Gustave Ilboudo and the Minister of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Innovation, Hon. Professor Alkassoum Maiga with an entire Burkina Faso delegation. According to UNESCO (2019), the property is composed of five elements located in different provinces of Burkina Faso. It includes about fifteen standing, natural-draught furnaces, several other furnace structures, mines and traces of dwellings. AWHF congratulates the Government of Burkina Faso on the outcome. The inscription is achieved through efforts by many stakeholders working closely with the African World Heritage Fund including the World Heritage Committee members (Angola, Botswana, Tanzania, Tunisia and Zimbabwe), the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies as well as the Centre for Heritage Development in 1 Africa (CHDA) and the School of African Ululations and celebrations of the announcement ©AWHF Heritage (EPA). 2. AWHF SIDE EVENT ON “YOUTH, INNOVATION & SUSTAINABILITY IN AFRICA” From left to right: Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Managers' Role and Responsibilities Recalling The
    Role: recalling the statutory processes of the implementation of the World Heritage Convention and its Operational Guidelines STEFAN WESSMAN SENIOR ADVISER FINNISH NATIONAL BOARD OF ANTIQUITIES Operational Guidelines I.A The Operational Guidelines 3. The key users of the Operational Guidelines are: a) the States Parties to the World Heritage Convention; b) the Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the Cultural and Natural Heritage of Outstanding Universal Value, hereinafter referred to as "the World Heritage Committee" or “the Committee”; c) the UNESCO World Heritage Centre as Secretariat to the World Heritage Committee, hereinafter referred to as "the Secretariat”; d) the Advisory Bodies to the World Heritage Committee ; e) site managers, stakeholders and partners in the protection of World Heritage properties. Operational Guidelines I.C The States Parties to the World Heritage Convention 12. States Parties to the Convention are encouraged to ensure the participation of a wide variety of stakeholders, including site managers, local and regional governments, local communities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other interested parties and partners in the identification, nomination and protection of World Heritage properties. Operational Guidelines II.C Tentative Lists Procedure and Format 64. States Parties are encouraged to prepare their Tentative Lists with the participation of a wide variety of stakeholders, including site managers, local and regional governments, local communities, NGOs and other interested parties and partners. Operational Guidelines Immediately following the annual session of the World Heritage Committee Notification to the States Parties The Secretariat notifies all States Parties whose nominations have been examined by the Committee of the relevant decisions of the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND and SEA TOUR Bike & Boat
    LAND AND SEA TOUR Bike & Boat An exciting journey between land and sea. We see the exclusive scenery of the Cinque Terre from the mountains and the sea, suspended on the pedals and aboard our yacht. A light bath and a sea bath. The queen of experiences. Difficulty: Easy Distance: Bike Km 35 / Boat 5 miles Journey time: Bike about 3 hours / Boat 3 hours Bike type: Mtb eBike Terrain: 50% asphalt, 50% dirt Departure: CicloPoint La Spezia viale Italia, 19 Route: By bike: La Spezia - Biassa - Via dei Santuari - Cinque Terre. By boat: Monterosso - Cinque Terre - tour of the islands (Palmaria, Tino and Tinetto) - Porto Venere Tasting Questo tour si svolge nei periodi in cui la barca è in mare. Biassa: characteristic hillside village of ancient origin, 8.5 km south-west of La Spezia, is a belvedere over the city and the Gulf of Poets. The architectures of main interest are the church of St. Martino which, despite repeated transformations, retains a Romanesque character and, on a hill outside the town, the remains of the thirteenth-century castle of Coderone, a Genoese outpost against Pisa. Via Vittorio Veneto, n° 60 – 31032 Casale sul Sile (TV) Tel. 0422/702580 – Fax 0422/783945 P.IVA 04780210268 – N. REA TV-377502 [email protected][email protected][email protected] www.shantaramviaggi.it Via dei Santuari: each of the five villages of the Cinque Terre corresponds, halfway up the coast, to a sanctuary to which the inhabitants have always been linked by deep devotion. Five churches connected to the respective village by steep mule tracks, real "Via Crucis" still traveled by believers today during the annual celebrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem and the Implementation of 39 C/Resolution 36
    40th session, Paris, 2019 40 C 40 C/16 13 November 2019 Original: English Item 5.2 of the agenda JERUSALEM AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 39 C/RESOLUTION 36 OUTLINE Source: 39 C/Resolution 36 and 207 EX/Decision 38 Background: By the above-mentioned Resolution, the General Conference invited the Director-General to present to it, at its 40th session, a progress report on the implementation of the Action Plan for the safeguarding of the cultural heritage of the Old City of Jerusalem and to include this item in the agenda of its 40th session. By 207 EX/Decision 38, the Executive Board invited the Director-General to submit a progress report on this matter at its 209th session. Purpose: The Director-General informs the General Conference about the current situation and the steps taken to safeguard the cultural heritage of the Old City of Jerusalem since its 39th session. Decision required: Paragraph 20. Job : 201912405 40 C/16 Context 1. “The Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (Site proposed by Jordan)”, is inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List and on the List of World Heritage in Danger, and is the sacred city of the three monotheistic religions – Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The historical, cultural and spiritual significance of Jerusalem, as a microcosm of humanity’s diversity is, in itself, an appeal for dialogue. 2. At its 39th session, the General Conference examined document 39 C/16, which presented a report by the Director-General concerning the preservation of the cultural heritage of the Old City of Jerusalem, and adopted 39 C/Resolution 36 in which it decided, inter alia, to include this item on the agenda of its 40th session.
    [Show full text]