https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/

COVID- 19 INTERVENTIONS IN Updated 06/10/2020

FAITH TAYLOR, MARK PELLING, MAUD BORIE, BRUCE MALAMUD, JOHN DRUMMOND (KCL) JOSEPH MULLIGAN, VERA BUKACHI, AMOS WANDERA, MANSHUR TALIB (KDI) https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • IMPLICATIONS& FINDINGS KEY • • • • • • • • We collected have The The boundaries of the settlement the – of boundaries Major Major in general. on transmission. impacts minimal Improvement underlines still services in these 9 round minute to/from trip dedicated stations hand washing residents Coordination actors amongst for areasaccessible in Some Kibera higher relief than already CV19 to neighbourhoods access less have underserved Informal settlements historically seen as ‘hotspots’ forInformal ‘hotspots’ disease. historically as seen settlements response the 39% of been has locally lead should improve and distribution for access equitable gender support. Locations sanitary for distribution of and NGOs (according interventions and CBOs doing bulk the data). the to of Improved collaboration (includinglevels future to pandemics) . solution the of part spatial distribution civil society buildingcivil on society efforts and good enhance willcan reach and improve social contract. open spaces data (e.g. Olympic, Undugu on of of 270 CV19 Covid Kibera needs more and better distributed open interventions in Kiberainterventions uneven is of services and support services improve can of spatial distribution equitable outcomes for products and baby supplies areproducts supplies and baby accessible. and not easily few and Government NGOs - 19 (CV19) grounds, School far the playgrounds)at points key as serve distribution interventions for 80% of residentsfor (longer 80% of for other – 20%) in Kibera inadequacy of public health infrastructure of inadequacy spaces to build resilience build to spaces on multiple between between - income and more – Kibera has been government possibly 2 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 2. 1. be taken to section Click a on the page: to CONTENTS OF TABLE 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. Statistics Results: 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. Background Start date what doing is Who Intervention type group Target organiser lead of Sector - Covid Kibera settingKibera Definitions survey The project The numbers in numbers 19 response 5. 4. 3. 5. Resources & Conclusions Conclusions & Resources 2. 1. Results: 7. 6. 4. 3. 2. 1. Maps Results: Hotspots Hotspots Storyspheres Storyspheres Purpose time Travel spots Cold Lead intervention of Type village Count per activities of distributionSpatial organise Storyspheres r 3 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • PROJECT THE 1.1 • • • • • Aim: Covid to inventory distribution the & characteristics of activities (‘interventions’) and support planning of further interventions further activities (‘interventions’) planning support and of Survey online at King’s College London Kounkuey + Design Initiative collaboration, 13 Inventory of Covid Inventory of add furtheradd context Map supplemented with immersive ‘ records survey 270 Covid isindividual an (each Developed generally applicable, survey detailed Survey – – – Secondary dataSecondary from MapKibera enumeration throughPhone KDI social network Social media deployed https://tinyurl.com/comorf contactlessly - 19 related19 interventions via: Covid Storyspheres’ Storyspheres’ - 19 19 Tracker - survey (e.g., handwashing) inKibera - 19 related19 intervention inKibera ) (location, type, users, etc.) 360º photos360º narrated Kibera by residents to th Apr Apr – 31 st - Jul 20 19 response19 4 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 1.2 THE SURVEY THE SURVEY 1.2 • • • • • • with fixed categories of answer.with of categories fixed has multiple the above questions of Each Time Location washing, resources) Type people, businesses etc.) Target Sector Number : start/end: date, opening hours of activity (e.g.,of information, hand beneficiaries of organizer of of users of of intervention of (e.g., vulnerable 5 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ WHO (2020) https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/covid https://www.who.int/environmental_health_emergencies/vulnerable_groups/en/ (n/d) WHO organisations scale Small Vulnerable Socially Vulnerable Covid Beneficiary Intervention Term 1.3 DEFINITIONS DEFINITIONS 1.3 - 19 Covid seriously ill or die from Covid Demographic groups and groups with specific that conditions may make them more to become likely targeted at specifically is intervention the that grouppeople or of individual The interventions (e.g., giving free meals to families) smaller) (often indirect, informal or station) handwashing a building (e.g., interventions direct,formal Any activity established to mitigate the impact of Covid Definition organisations (FBOs). Kumi Well includes: this work our For membership. reach and local a have that Organisers housing. poor in andliving displaced homeless, a disaster. children, limited but not to: includes is This pregnant poverty, in living malnourished, women, As defined by the WHO (n/d) People that may be unable to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover from 2020). (WHO, system affecting immune their conditions with andthose conditions) health co with those years), (>60 were:elderly greaterrisk groups, Leaders/Chiefs, Local Community Based Organisations (CBOs), and Faith - 19 infection is still evolving. At the time of doing this work (Apr work this doing of time the At evolving. still is infection 19 - 19/information/high - 19. Our understanding of what characteristics determine the severity of of determineseverity the characteristics what of Our 19. understanding - risk - groups - morbidities (e.g., cardiovascular, (e.g., underlying diabetes, morbidities - 19 in Kibera (in the broadest sense). This could be could This broadest the Kibera(in sense). in 19 - Jul 2020), those deemed to be at - wishers, - based based Nyumba 6 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • Kibera, (Kenya) SETTING THE 1.4 violence violence solid waste management, flooding, fire, Cholera, &stressesShocks ( people 750 per point people, 1450 per water 1 Less building than toilet 1 2.25km ~300,000 people in MapKibera , 2020) 2 ( (Mitra al., et UNHabitat , 2006) 2017) : 7 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ KIBERA RESPONSE TO COVID IN NUMBERS IN COVID TO RESPONSE 1.5 KIBERA Based aon survey deployed by KDI KCL& April activity each day May (or more) new more) new (or activities 270 Jun 2020 -Jun https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 1 activities led by organisations organisers 39% local/small 88+ – July 2020: stations mapped stations activity types handwashing handwashing 58 98 station for 20% of of 20% for station time time to nearest Minutes travel Minutes travel handwashing handwashing types targetof >4.5 residents 37 group 8 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ Based aon survey deployed by KDI KCL& April interventions interventions monetary targeted at businesses involving 2% transfers 2% https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 1.5 OBSERVATIONS… activities lead by 20% of coordination coordination trip for PPE trip for Minutes Minutes round 55% 9 CBOs – - July 2020: Kiberans 34 55/270 handwashing handwashing physically located located physically ?/98 outside Kibera functional interventions stations villages vulnerable to Covid Interventions explicitly explicitly Interventions targeted at individuals targetedindividuals at residents walking walking residents 7 PPE distribution -27 minutes for 70% 19/? - 19 10 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 2. RESULTS: STATISTICS - COVID ACTIVITY ACTIVITY 19 11 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ NGO International What sector does the lead organiser of the activity belong to? 270 responses sorted into broad groups: 2.1 RESULTS: SECTOR OF LEAD NGO Kibera NGO Other (e.g., Kenyan) Nat.Gov Community Community Based Organisation County Gov ORGANISER Business Private Local Leader Leader Local Faith Based Organisation Individuals/Well Wishers Individuals/Well Medical Medical 12 Corpo ration Chief Kumi Nyu mba https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ NGO International What sector does the lead organiser of the activity belong to? 270 responses sorted into broad groups: 2.1 RESULTS: SECTOR OF LEAD • • • • - KiberaCovid based Uneven access to certain Does not factor in efficacy of activity specific). areNGOs Kibera 56% of activities led by NGOs (of which 14% of Kumi) Nyumba leaders, organisers 39% of activities are led by small scale, local organisations (CBOs, FBOs, Individuals, Chiefs/local 19 response19 stronglyled: is locally NGO Kibera NGO Other (e.g., Kenyan) )? organisers (e.g., faith Nat.Gov Community Community Based Organisation County Gov ORGANISER Business Private Local Leader Leader Local Faith Based Organisation Individuals/Well Wishers Individuals/Well Medical Medical 13 Corpo ration Chief Kumi Nyu mba https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ and 37 sub broad 7 categories into groups)sorted canhave multiple(an target activity groups target 317 detailing responses Who is the intervention aimed at? 270 question: survey the to Responses GROUP TARGET 2.2 RESULTS: - categories: Kisumu Kisumu Soweto Kambi Ndogo Muru

Raila

Child Headed Household Headed Child

Vulerable Families Vulerable Soweto E. GBV of Survivors

Laini Saba Kianda

Gatwekera Youth

Lindi

Mothers

Makina Girls

Children Women

Silanga

Elderly

Socially Vulnerable Socially

Village Residents Disabled

Unwell

Faith Group Faith

Medically Vulnerable Medically

Nyumba Kumi Nyumba

Community Group Community

CFK beneficiaries CFK

Specific Group Group Specific

CHV

Med. Prof. Med.

Teachers

Professional Group Professional Local Leaders Local

Drivers

Employees Business Group Business

Informalworkers Commuters Structureowners Any Kibera residents Kibera Any 15 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ Large variety in target group (37 sub known to be medically vulnerable to Covid groups targeted at (6%) activities few Relatively targeted. villages of distribution group.Unequal community or village specific a of resident being Sometarget groups require ‘membership’ (2%) groups business at - Covid but targeted activities few Very vulnerable to Covid Most of Kibera could be considered socially Most activities have a broad target (anyone = 62%). and 37 sub broad 7 categories into groups)sorted canhave multiple(an target activity groups target 317 detailing responses Who is the intervention aimed at? 270 question: survey the to Responses GROUP TARGET 2.2 RESULTS: 19 having large impact on livelihoods. large onlivelihoods. having 19 impact - categories: - 19 due to poor housing. duepoor19 to housing. - categories) –e.g. - 19 Kisumu Kisumu Soweto West Soweto Kambi Mashimoni Kichinjio Ndogo Muru

Raila

Child Headed Household Headed Child

Vulerable Families Vulerable Soweto E. GBV of Survivors

Laini Saba Kianda

Gatwekera Youth

Lindi

Mothers

Makina Girls

Children Women

Silanga

Elderly

Socially Vulnerable Socially

Village Residents Disabled

Unwell

Faith Group Faith

Medically Vulnerable Medically

Nyumba Kumi Nyumba

Community Group Community

CFK beneficiaries CFK

Specific Group Group Specific

CHV

Med. Prof. Med.

Teachers

Professional Group Professional Local Leaders Local

Drivers

Employees Business Group Business

Informalworkers Commuters Structureowners Any Kibera residents Kibera Any 16 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ categories. is it? 270 responses sorted into 11 What type of Covid question: survey the to Responses INTERVENTION TYPE 2.3 RESULTS: -

19 related activity related19 activity Resource collection Resource

Information

Support

Coord. & Comms & Coord.

Medical

Training

Resource distribution Term Longer Financial Other

Covid Specific 17 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ sub is it? 270 responses sorted into 58 What type of Covid question: survey the to Responses TYPE SUB- INTERVENTION 2.3 RESULTS: - categories. - 19 related activity related19 activity

Myth dispelling

Sanitary supplies Sanitary

Food Sensitisation Other Delivery services Delivery

Poster Flyers

Radio

Baby Goods Baby

Clothing

PPE

TV

Psychological Psychological Mural Money

Social Media

Other Money Clothing

Medication

School Supplies

Baby Goods Network Social Groups

Counselling Resource collection Resource

Sanitary suppliesOther

Information SMS Referral point Referral

Water Phone

Support

Covid

Coord. & Comms & Coord.

- 19 Testing 19

Treatment

PPE check Temp.

Prescription

Clinic

Professional

Medical

Citizens

Handwashing

Service provision Service

Other

Hygiene supplies Training

Waste Longer Term Longer

Resource distribution Health Cash transfer Cash

Financial

Rent Payment Rent

Survey Food

Covid Specific

Burial Isolation center Isolation

Water provision Water

Remote working Remote

Other

Cleaning Distancing

Handwashing 18 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ sub is it? 270 responses sorted into 58 What type of Covid question: survey the to Responses TYPE SUB- INTERVENTION 2.3 RESULTS: • • • • - categories. significant impact significant interventions (1.8%) though may have financial direct few Relatively and food distribution (9%) sub-types Main are handwashing (36%) coordination support, collection, resource Kibera is helping itself with information, types of activity Diverse response to Covid - 19 related activity related19 activity -19: 58sub

Myth dispelling Sanitary supplies Sanitary

-

Food Sensitisation Other Delivery services Delivery

Poster Flyers

Radio

Baby Goods Baby

Clothing

PPE

TV

Psychological Psychological Mural Money

Social Media

Other Money Clothing

Medication

School Supplies

Baby Goods Network Social Groups

Counselling Resource collection Resource

Sanitary suppliesOther

Information SMS Referral point Referral

Water Phone

Support

Covid

Coord. & Comms & Coord.

- 19 Testing 19

Treatment

PPE check Temp.

Prescription

Clinic

Professional

Medical

Citizens

Handwashing

Service provision Service

Other

Hygiene supplies Training

Waste Longer Term Longer

Resource distribution Health Cash transfer Cash

Financial

Rent Payment Rent

Survey Food

Covid Specific

Burial Isolation center Isolation

Water provision Water

Remote working Remote

Other

Cleaning Distancing

Handwashing 19 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/

Sector of lead organiser 2.4

Non-NGOs NGOs RESULTS:WHAT? DOING IS WHO Covid of 25% areabout NGOs’ doing sector. For example, ‘Other share of activities in a certain certain sector is doing a large A broad line indicates that a the total number of interventions. proportion the of indicates line are doing (right). The width of the and the types of intervention they sector of the lead organiser (left) the shows diagram Sankey This -19 specific activities.

20 Intervention type Intervention https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/

Sector of lead organiser 2.4

Non-NGOs NGOs RESULTS:WHAT? DOING IS WHO

21 Intervention type Intervention https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/

Sector of lead organiser 2.4

Non- NGOs RESULTS:WHAT? DOING IS WHO

22 Intervention type Intervention https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ NGOs Non NGOs 2.4 - • • • Government involvement in long in involvement Government information sharing (46%) and resource distribution (53%) CBOs doing majority of work work of majority doing CBOs sectors across most operating across NGOs operating sectors, NGOs all local International RESULTS:WHAT? DOING IS WHO on: term response-term coordination (55%), (55%), coordination 23 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ For 134 out of 270 interventions where given: was 270interventions For 134outof date start Cumulative Num. Interventions 2.5 100 120 140 20 40 60 80 1/3/2020 0 RESULTS: START DATE Number of interventions per week 1/4/2020 Start dateofCovid - 1/5/2020 19 related intervention Cumulative number of interventions 1/6/2020 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 24

Num. Interventions per Week https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ For 134 out of 270 interventions where given: was 270interventions For 134outof date start Cumulative Num. Interventions 2.5 100 120 140 20 40 60 80 1/3/2020 0 RESULTS: START DATE Number of interventions per week 1/4/2020 Start dateofCovid - 1/5/2020 19 related intervention • • • • Cumulative number of interventions Earliest intervention 1 intervention Earliest increaseSteady activities. of number in between May day every activity new 1 of Average largeSome jumps onwards. March early from response 1/6/2020 - June st Feb – Feb more steady 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 25

Num. Interventions per Week https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3. RESULTS: MAPS 26 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.1RESULTS: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION NGONG FOREST RD GOLF COURSE where location was given) was where location (n villages Kibera within -19 intervention Covid of Location NAIROBI DAM = 248 500m N 27

https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ (0.18km

3.2 RESULTS:3.2 COUNT VILLAGE

) 2 (0.07km (0.19km 2 (0.74km ) 2 2 ) ) (0.29km NGONG FOREST RD 2 ) (0.47km 2 ) (0.17km 2 )

(0.12km (0.07km

2

)

) 2 (0.13km GOLF COURSE 2 (0.27km ) 2 ) (0.28km 2 ) (0.23km 2 ) NAIROBI DAM (0.24km Kibera village village Kibera interventions per Covid Number of 2 ) -19 500m N 28 28

https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ (0.18km

3.2 RESULTS:3.2 COUNT VILLAGE

) 2 (0.07km (0.19km 2 (0.74km ) 2 2 ) ) (0.29km NGONG FOREST RD 2 ) (0.47km 2 ) (0.17km 2 )

(0.12km (0.07km

2

)

) 2 • • (0.13km access to another ( intervention (e.g., handwashing) but poor one to access good have may some strongly varies village per intervention of type the show that will slides Subsequent many interventions aimed at Kibera. the Kibera boundaries, but is the site of Olympic/ GOLF COURSE 2 (0.27km ) 2 ) Ayany (0.28km W Soweto Raila E Soweto Kianda Mashimoni Silanga Kambimuru Kichinjo Kisumu Olympic/ Laini Saba Lindi Makina Gatwekera 2 Village ) (0.23km is aarea formal outside of Ndogo Ayany e.g 2 ) Area (Ha) Area NAIROBI DAM ,. baby products) 19 24 18 13 23 12 17 74 28 27 47 29 7 7 (0.24km Interventions 2 ) Num. 13 10 55 21 21 40 26 4 8 8 7 7 1 4 Interventions/ Interventions/ 500m N 29 Num. 0.57 0.59 0.74 0.75 0.78 0.85 0.90 0.21 0.33 0.44 0.54 0.58 0.14 0.57 Ha 29 – https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.3RESULTS: INTERVENTION OF TYPE NGONG FOREST RD GOLF COURSE Intervention Type: Medical awareness & Info Financial Covid Coord & Comms - 19 specific NAIROBI DAM Training Support Resource dist. Resource collec. 500m N 30 30 # Activities per village per Activities # https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 17- 9 5 3 2 1 0 - - - 16 8 4 32 3.3RESULTS: INTERVENTION OF TYPE Coordination & Comms Coordination Resource collection Medical Handwashing Financial Support Resource Distribution Info & Info Awareness Training N https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.4 RESULTS:3.4 ORGANISER LEAD NGONG FOREST RD Sector of lead organiser: lead of Sector GOLF COURSE Community (CBO) Community Local Local leader Nat./County Gov. (FBO) based Faith Unknown NAIROBI DAM Nyumba NGO Well wisher Well Kumi 500m /Private N 32 32 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 1 hectare1 m100 × = 3.5 RESULTS: SPOTS HOT 100 m100 square NGONG FOREST RD GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM per hectare interventions Covid Density of -19 500m N 33 33 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 1 hectare1 m100 × = • • • (e.g., Some variety of interventions. to a access easier have hotspots these to residents close that suggest might This another. interventions are located nearby to one ‘hotspots’ of activity. means many This Makina Thereare areas Olympic, in 3.5 Andolo areas known to be income low , Laini RESULTS: SPOTS HOT ) are not near hotspots. Saba andSaba 100 m100 square Lindi , Gatwekera that are clear NGONG FOREST RD GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM per hectare interventions Covid Density of -19 500m N 34 34 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.5 RESULTS: SPOTS HOT NGONG FOREST RD • • • to accessibility across the entireto accessibility settlement In the longer term, further consideration should be given interventions in areas of easy access/utilities In an emergency response mode, this is logical to locate centers. health preexisting roads or space, open Many of the hotspots appear to be located close to GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 35 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.6 RESULTS: SPOTS COLD NGONG FOREST RD GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM interventionsha per DensityofCovid hectareper intervention 1 < with Locations 500m N 36 -19 36 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • • • of travel times. travel of In the following section we present a detailed analyses may Longer (and journeys thus time outside of the house) interventions. access to further travel to have will zones these in People be interventions of density low very a have that settlement) the of periphery There the in are numerous (particularly zones Some 3.6 • • • • low- present challenges such as: such challenges present Access under curfews and restricted movement time Issues around gender such as travelling at issues Accessibility for those with disabilities and mobility Increased exposure to Covid of income these , and carryingchildren. . RESULTS: SPOTS COLD coldspots or vulnerable intersect . - with 19 NGONG FOREST RD areas known night night to GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM interventionsha per DensityofCovid hectareper intervention 1 < with Locations 500m N 37 -19 37 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ walk time byrounding time walk minute. upnext the to 32secondsadding travel to 1minute 3.9 kmph. at 100m Isochrone additional the of present maps estimate conservative a Finnis average the calculated using and of was Walton’s observed slowest and ascending descending (2008) travel time, buffer 100m the Because road adds travel access to distance network from structured within area, additional travel time buffered and buffered by100m structures with intersecting area were considered equal area travel an within time. of highlighting all navigable roads travelled be could that time interval a within given Service areas outwardly moving from were intervention given a modelled each location of in 5 pedestrians elderly descending gradient observed using and each to segment 50m travel assigned then speed was subdivided road network. The had or determined ascending an each line segment whether a segment gradient of and 50m drapedlines were of subdivided over DTM, the into segments each node at adding on values elevation the Walton, 2008). The model methodology follows procedure a presented in Colclough (2010). and Owens Road network digital terrain model (DTM; KDI, (Finnis and speeds walking 2015), pedestrian of empirical an study and results the of tool GIS in Quantum and v3.4.14 Nairobi relied of road consisting on data (Open Street input network Map, 2020), a Isochrone travel equal areas modelled showing maps time were of developed area service the using network analysis Method: 3.7 RESULTS: TRAVEL TIMES , presented as by Finnis and Walton (2008). . Isochronal network lines were - minute increments,minute walking speeds for for speeds walking 38 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.7 RESULTS:TRAVEL TIMES: HANDWASHING NGONG FOREST RD GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 39 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • • • • 3.7 gel. not include pre include not gel. Does handwashing facilities or distribution of alcohol wash hands. portiona significant of the hour) day (~1 travellingto to up adds minutes) day, per (4.5 time travel short a even Assuming hands are washed once per hour, for 12 hours 2020 September of as functioning remain Unknown how many of the 93 handwashing stations structures?these for habits handwashing regular of lack or reinfection supply of alcohol gel or further handwashing stations. be targeted could times for travel long Structureswith handwashing station (9 (9 station handwashing structuresareof 20% – 4.5 equates to a 9 a to equates This station. handwashing surveyed a of walk minute 4.5 estimated are an Kibera within structuresin of 80% RESULTS:TRAVEL TIMES: HANDWASHING - minute round trip. minute - existing existing – 34 minute 34 17 minutes walk of walk minutes 17 round trip) trip) round NGONG FOREST RD - risk of risk - GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 40 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • • 3.7 69% of structuresareof 14 69% within distributed reasonably well interventions Fooddistribution have longest travel times to foodto times travel longest have areas (Kianda Peripheral trip weekly) or frequent bea may daily (e.g., This distribution RESULTS: TRAVEL , W Sowto , W - minute round trip of food food of round trip minute , Raila NGONG FOREST RD , E. Soweto) TIMES: FOOD TIMES: GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 41 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.7 RESULTS: TRAVEL NGONG FOREST RD TIMES: PPE TIMES: GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 42 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • ( could consider areas currently under sites PPEdistribution of siting Subsequent for 19% of structures for obtaining PPE Long travel times ( (PPE) may be an infrequent task equipment protective personal Obtaining Kichinjio 3.7 , Makina RESULTS: TRAVEL , Kianda 24- 54 minute 54 ) round trip) trip) round - served NGONG FOREST RD TIMES: PPE TIMES: GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 43 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.7 RESULTS:TRAVEL NGONG FOREST RD TIMES: FEMALE PRODUCTS GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 44 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • 3.7 RESULTS:TRAVEL clustered towards the West of Kibera Baby supplies and personal support interventions also sanitary products other groups other than relevantto interventions access lower much have certain groups with certain needs (e.g., mothers) may structureshave of 64% located in North and West products, sanitary distributing intervention two Only 24- 54 minute 54 round trip for for trip round NGONG FOREST RD – indicates that TIMES: FEMALE PRODUCTS GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 45 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.7 RESULTS: TRAVEL NGONG FOREST RD TIMES: BABY TIMES: GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 46 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • • • 3.7 Nearly half (47%) half Nearly of structures have 54 products baby distributing intervention one Only 19? increasedmean exposurecould Covid to travel Further baby 19) carrying if to of meet Covid needs (gendertravelling implications slower be Mothers/parents may be spending morecould time regularly time Travel supplies baby for trip round RESULTS: TRAVEL NGONG FOREST RD – 120 minute 120 - - TIMES: BABY TIMES: GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 47 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 3.7 RESULTS:TRAVEL NGONG FOREST RD TIMES: SUPPORT TIMES: GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 48 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • • 3.7 RESULTS:TRAVEL clustered towards the West of Kibera Baby supplies and female sanitary supplies also but May not be seen as important for immediate other groups. other than relevantto interventions access lower much have certain groups with certain needs (e.g., mothers) may support interventions (24 personal to times travel long structureshave of 51% towards the West of Kibera All interventions offering personal support are clustered will be important in long recovery.term - 114 minutes round minutes 114 trip) NGONG FOREST RD – indicates that response, response, TIMES: SUPPORT TIMES: GOLF COURSE NAIROBI DAM 500m N 49 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ STORYSPHERES 4. RESULTS: 50 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • • 4.1 STORYSPHERES OVERVIEW 4.1STORYSPHERES Multiple Storyspheres can be linked together to create a virtual tour of a location. location. a of tour createto virtual together a Storyspheres linked be can Multiple smartphone. a with combined headset reality cardboard virtual Google (US$5) Storyspheres browser, web a in viewed canbe cost low a orin onsmartphone, a that place. about stories hear and location a visit Storyspheres to virtually viewer the allow A Storysphere is a 360º photograph combined with audio narration. 51 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • • 4.2 RESULTS4.2 Combine audio and photo into immersive, remote tour of Kibera of tour remote immersive, into photo and audio Combine free using app smartphone Kibera in 360º collected photographs How have you been impacted? are What themes: measuresGuiding your What fears? are undertaken? being in May 2020 voice memos residents WhatsApp via 10Kibera undertaken with interviews Short : STORYSPHERES : 52 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 4.2 RESULTS4.2 https://storyspheres.com/scene/gh8EopVZ https://storyspheres.com/scene/6j7xvkdq https://storyspheres.com/scene/qFkhmNML https://storyspheres.com/scene/jywGxokT : STORYSPHERES https://storyspheres.com/scene/dnaKs7pA https://storyspheres.com/scene/dYLFYsoH https://storyspheres.com/scene/ZZpNTsrR Storyspheres online Google cardboard in web browser, web in smartphone or smartphone smartphone + smartphone View the headset. 53 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ RESOURCES 5. FURTHER FURTHER 5. 54 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ 5.1RESOURCES - https://tinyurl.com/comorf tour : VIRTUAL TOUR TOUR VIRTUAL : 55 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ : ONLINE MAP & DATA & MAP ONLINE : RESOURCES 5.2 Interactive web map available at xxx. at available webmap Interactive 56 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ : SURVEY STRUCTURE SURVEY : 5.3RESOURCES • • • • [email protected] contact [email protected] contact structure elsewhere, use to please survey you would the likeIf copy a of Applicable smartphones Can via web deployed be Covid- Comprehensive structure survey 19 interventions 19 elsewhere using Survey123 & and and for for 57 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ • • • • 5.4 Data and resources and Data https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ at available collection mobile data Contactless applicable Survey >270 diverse bottom CONCLUSIONS [email protected] For to access data & more info contact: elsewhere - up Covid - 19 inKibera place taking activities and and [email protected] 58 https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ kilometre a https://www.kcl.ac.uk/how 5.5FURTHER -density -population E xpressive M https://emorfmaps.wordpress.com/ apping o -of -130000-people-per f -do R Kibera, Nairobi in 19 interventions Covid at looking for Adapting methods esilient F -you -manage RESOURCES RESOURCES utures -covid -square -19with - - - plan.2020.103771 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurb 59