Moving Toward Regional Integration of the Arab League

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Moving Toward Regional Integration of the Arab League ODUMUNC 2017 Issue Brief Arab League Moving Toward Regional Integration of the Arab League by Sean McGuffin Old Dominion University Introduction Member States, whether it be politically, militarily, economically, or socially. It is up to The Arab League has fostered cooperation each delegation to contribute its countries views between Arab states since its founding in 1945. on integration, and to ensure its position is well Its membership has grown from six original served in any final decisions. Integration and signatories to twenty-two Member States, plus reform can occur across the whole of the league Observer States, that stretch from the Maghreb all at once in a single resolution or can be to the Indian Ocean. Since the first days of the proposed and voted on piece meal in sections that pertain to different types of integration. In Arab emancipation and the Arab Revolt against some cases integration at a sub-regional level their imperial Ottoman Turkish rulers in 1916, among smaller groupings of states within the many Arabs have dreamed of a single Arab Arab League may be conceived, but as this is a entity to unify its far-flung peoples. While such meeting of the entire Arab League it is preferred unity hasn’t been seen in hundreds of years, the that proposals mostly pertain to the whole entire Arab world may need to cooperate further with organization. one another to face the many threats that geography, international terrorism, vast youth A major barrier to integration is presence of unemployment, corruption, and external threats observer states, non-members like Turkey who pose. are Islamic, but not Arab. How much can thy be included in integration plans? If not included, do Integration and unification of the Member States they have an incentive and the power to stop the of the Arab League is an old but still distant others? goal. The Arab League has little in common with the far more advanced European Union Who is an Arab? (EU), in which Member States give up sovereignty to maximize trade and easy human Arab is a cultural and linguistic term referring to movement. It also is behind much more modest those who speak Arabic as their first language, regional organizations the Association of have cultural likeness with common notions of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), that have Arab cultural expression, and self-identify as an done more to promote free trade. Why has the Arab. It should be noted, Arab is not a religious Arab League not achieved more, despite the term. Likewise, nowhere in the Arab League great similarities of many of its members? And Charter does it mention religion. Though the what can be done to make the Arab World more Arab World encompasses an estimated 420 coherent, unified and powerful? million people and expands over a massive area, Arabs as a group are relatively homogenous given their size. The Arab language has many Mission dialects across the Arab world that can challenge Arabs to understand one another at times, and The Arab League’s mission is to enact reforms there are still differences in custom that to better integrate the policies and laws of its influence the people in different regions. Arab League Moving Toward Regional Integration of the Arab League However, these are small given the cultural further integrations are to become a reality, it is similarities that bind Arabs together as a possible the charter will need to be amended. If common people.1 so, a 2/3 majority is needed (Article 19). Such possible amendments could reform any number of procedural or constitutional items, but that 2 How the League Works will be left to the body’s imagination. Past Integration Attempts Arabs as a people have been divided and occupied for hundreds of years, but there have been contemporary attempts by Arab heads of state like Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt and Muammar al-Gaddafi of Libya to unite at least portions of the Arab world together. Many of these attempts were founded in appeals to popular Pan-Arabism or a grasp at power, but their failures show how to improve upon their mistakes. The United Arab Republic, 1958- 1961, was a union between Egypt and Syria under Nasser, at the time the Egyptian President. The league itself is an international organization The primary reason for its formation was comprised entirely of states with populations strategic convenience that was too good to pass and, therefore governments, who culturally up. Its failure was due almost entirely to identify as Arab states. To clarify, a culture is Nasser’s own policies. He isolated his political not a religion or race, but set of commonly held supporters in Syria in a move to consolidate values that center around history, custom, and power, and instituted very unpopular policies of language. The league's charter has a few details reform that didn’t win him much support and it would be good to know. A majority of didn’t fix many problems. 3 Similar plans for decisions of the league are binding only to the unity were proposed by former Libyan dictator states that accept them, and unanimous decisions Gaddafi. He attempted to unify Libya with are binding upon all (Article 7). Each member Tunisia and another state of North Africa, and shall respect the system of government in the another time with Egypt and Syria. These other states (Article 8). In case of aggression upon any member an emergency convening can be called where decisions are made unanimously upon how to deal with the threat (Article 6). If 2 League oF Arab States, Charter oF Arab League, 22 1 “Facts about Arabs and the Arab World,” American March 1945, available at: Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, (2009, http://www.reFworld.org/docid/3ae6b3ab18.html. Washington DC.) 3 James P. Jankowski, “Nasser's Egypt, Arab http://www.adc.org/2009/11/Facts-about-arabs- Nationalism, and the United Arab Republic,” Lynne and-the-arab-world/ Rienner Publishers, (2002, London). Arab League Moving Toward Regional Integration of the Arab League attempts were called the Arab Islamic Republic movement of goods and people and the revision and Federation of Arab Republics respectively.4 of customs policy, with the possibility of political union. The grouping has several All of these plans failed for multiple reasons, internal bodies including an investment bank, an particularly each leader’s inability to come to an international tribunal, and council of foreign understanding on how to integrate their very 5 ministers. Yet for all of this, the grouping has different countries. The competition and never been capable of making real progress due consolidation of personal power has also to internal political squabbles, chiefly between constantly and regularly thwarted many attempts Algeria and Morocco.6 at unity. If this body is to succeed in its goal, then it required the creation of a system that Another, and overall more successful, regional plays to mutual benefit and protects the interest bloc of Arab states is the Gulf Cooperation of the component members involved without Council (GCC), which has recently changed its appearing to be a clear power grab for one leader name to the Cooperation Council for the Arab or another. Additionally, they need to accept the States of the Gulf. This grouping of six states, all very different social and economic systems each centered on the Persian Gulf, have several state operates under, and plan some sort of different cooperative and international methodology to handle these differences. groupings, but one of the most significant is Finally, Arab leaders need follow through. Many their recent finalization of a Customs Union agreements have been made in the spirit of Pan- between all six states. This has free trade Arabism to appease the public, but would then between them, a common external tariff, and a be ignored. system of shared customs duties based off economic weigh.7 Integration Integration can mean something different depending on how much integration a group of states intend to press. At one end is political integration, fully incorporating different states 5“MAGHREB ARAB UNION – MAU,” European together to have one fully sovereign unit, but Institute for Research on Mediterranean and Euro- issues are abound when tackling the daunting Arab Cooperation, (Brussels), task of integrating a state’s economy, http://www.medea.be/en/countries/arab-world- immigration, security, and foreign policy. Many general/maghreb-arab-union-mau/. states in the league have partnerships with 6 John Thorne, “The liberated Maghreb looks to cooperation groups with other Arab states in economic union,” The National, (February 17, 2012, smaller groupings. Abu Dhabi) http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle- One such group is Arab Maghreb Union, created east/the-liberated-maghreb-looks-to-economic- in 1989. The purpose of this five member union union. of North African states was to enhance the free 7 “GCC customs union fully operational,” The Peninsula, (January 03, 2015, Doha Qatar,) 4 “Libya and Arab Unity,” U.S. Library oF Congress, http://thepeninsulaqatar.com/news/middle- http://countrystudies.us/libya/32.htm. east/314466/gcc-customs-union-fully-operational. Arab League Moving Toward Regional Integration of the Arab League Security Integration Arab states have also looked to integrate their strategic planning council than a fully respective military apparatuses for greater cooperative military network.10 collective security, as well as a tool to be used Militarily the League has uncertainty and against what many view as their common instability in many locations. Libya is still torn enemy, Israel. While the League has attempted apart by civil war as different militias jockey for to do this in the past it could be something this position.
Recommended publications
  • Rediscovering the Arab Dimension of Middle East Regional Politics
    Review of International Studies page 1 of 22 2011 British International Studies Association doi:10.1017/S0260210511000283 The New Arab Cold War: rediscovering the Arab dimension of Middle East regional politics MORTEN VALBJØRN AND ANDRÉ BANK* Abstract. This article provides a conceptual lens for and a thick interpretation of the emergent regional constellation in the Middle East in the first decade of the 21st century. It starts out by challenging two prevalent claims about regional politics in the context of the 2006 Lebanon and 2008–09 Gaza Wars: Firstly, that regional politics is marked by a fundamental break from the ‘old Middle East’ and secondly, that it has become ‘post-Arab’ in the sense that Arab politics has ceased being distinctly Arab. Against this background, the article develops the understanding of a New Arab Cold War which accentuates the still important, but widely neglected Arab dimension in regional politics. By rediscovering the Arab Cold War of the 1950–60s and by drawing attention to the transformation of Arab nationalism and the importance of new trans-Arab media, the New Arab Cold War perspective aims at supplementing rather that supplanting the prominent moderate-radical, sectarian and Realist-Westphalian narratives. By highlighting dimensions of both continuity and change it does moreover provide some critical nuances to the frequent claims about the ‘newness’ of the ‘New Middle East’. In addition to this more Middle East-specific contribution, the article carries lessons for a number of more general debates in International Relations theory concerning the importance of (Arab-Islamist) non-state actors and competing identities in regional politics as well as the interplay between different forms of sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • Keesing's World News Archives
    Keesing's World News Archives http://www.keesings.com/print/search?SQ_DESIGN_NAME=print&kssp_search_... Keesing's Record of World Events (formerly Keesing's Contemporary Archives), Volume 32, February, 1986 Libya, Page 34199 © 1931-2006 Keesing's Worldwide, LLC - All Rights Reserved. Internal and foreign affairs Summary and key dates General People's Congress session (Feb. 26-March 5, 1985). Passage of budget (March). Formation of ‘Pan-Arab Command’ by Col. Kadhafi (March). Proposal for creation of ‘Arab Union’ (June 11). Economic situation (to February 1986). Expulsions of foreign workers (August 1985). Relations with Arab countries (to January 1986). Military agreement with Iran (June 23, 1985). Severance of diplomatic relations by Iraq (June 26). Col. Kadhafi's visit to Soviet Union (Oct. 10–14). Relations with USA–alleged CIA destabilization plan (to January 1986). Contacts with France and Norway (April-October 1985). Convictions of Libyans in United Kingdom (February-May). Deportation of assassination team from Egypt (April). Attacks on Libyans abroad (February-November). Appeal by Col. Kadhafi to exiles to return home (Sept. 3). Internal politics–criticisms of government (1985). Government appointments (May 7). Conflict between Army and revolutionary committees (1985). Assassination attempts on Col. Kadhafi (March- September). Death of Col. Ishkal (November). The 10th ordinary session of the General People's Congress (the Libyan equivalent of a national assembly) took place in Tripoli, the capital, on Feb. 26-March 2, 1985. The Congress debated the various decisions made during the year by the basic people's congresses (BPCs–Libya's local decision-making bodies) and passed a number of resolutions on internal and foreign policy, of which the most important are detailed below.
    [Show full text]
  • 26Th Arab League Summit in Egypt
    26th Arab League Summit in Egypt Date: March 2015 In the name of God The Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate Your Excellency President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Your Majesties and Highnesses, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, At the outset I would like to express my deep appreciation to the president, government and people of the sisterly Arab Republic of Egypt for the efforts to render this summit a success and for the warm reception and generous hospitality. I also extend thanks and appreciation to my big brother His Highness Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al- Jaber Al-Sabah, Amir of the State of Kuwait for his sincere and constructive efforts during his presidency of the previous summit. I would like to congratulate ourselves and the brotherly people of Oman on the occasion of the auspicious return of His Majesty our brother Sultan Qabus bin Saeed safe and sound wishing His Majesty continued good health and wellbeing. Thanks also go to His Excellency Dr. Nabil Elaraby, Secretary-General of the Arab League and all his assistants for their tireless efforts to serve the joint Arab action. Your Majesties, Excellencies and Highnesses, This summit is held amid a complex regional and international situations and serious challenges facing our Arab Umma. The Palestinian cause comes in the forefront of these challenges. Peace, stability and security could only be achieved in our region by reaching a just and comprehensive peace based on the resolutions of international and Arab legitimacy and in accordance with the principle of Two-State Solution. A just and comprehensive peace is our strategic choice that we have maintained for decades, yet the peace process is not only at a standstill for more than twenty years, but unfortunately has also persistently moved backward.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions
    Durham E-Theses Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. SMAIRA, DIMA How to cite: SMAIRA, DIMA (2014) Changing Security:Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10810/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Changing Security: Theoretical and Practical Discussions. The Case of Lebanon. Dima Smaira Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations. School of Government and International Affairs Durham University 2014 i Abstract This study is concerned with security; particularly security in Lebanon. It is also equally concerned with various means to improve security. Building on debates at the heart of world politics and Security Studies, this study first discusses trends in global governance, in the study of security, and in security assistance to post-conflict or developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Arabism and Identity Politics: a Between Case Study
    Pan-Arabism and Identity Politics: A between case study design of Iraq 1952-1977 Alex Iliopoulos Master Thesis: International Relations, specialization Global Order in Historical Perspective Faculty of Humanities Based Sciences – Leiden University Date: January 2021 Student number: S1655485 First examiner of the university: Dr. Diana Natermann Second examiner of the university:1 Dr. Anne-Isabelle Richard TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Abstract -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Introduction of research question -------------------------------------------------------------4 CH 1: Pan-Arabism before 1940 (The ‘Awakening’ of Pan-Arabism)-------------------6 CH 2: The (Ethnic) Identity of Pan-Arabism-------------------------------------------------9 CH 3: The between case study research design ---------------------------------------------12 CH 4: Pan-Arabism in Iraq 1940-1952 -------------------------------------------------------15 4.1: Group Identification is fluid -----------------------------------------------------15 4.2: The driving forces behind Pan-Arabism ---------------------------------------17 4.3: ‘Othering’, the ‘out-group’ and ‘scapegoats’ ---------------------------------19 CH 5: Pan-Arabism from 1952-1970 (the in-between period of the two case studies)-21 CH 6: Pan-Arabism 1970-1977, What changed?--------------------------------------------24 Conclusion / Discussion-------------------------------------------------------------------------27 Bibliography--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------32
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic by Michael Habib
    Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic by Michael Habib A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences with a Concentration in History Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, Florida May 2016 Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic By Michael Habib This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Dr. Christopher Ely, and has been approved by the members of his supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ___________________________ Dr. Christopher Ely ____________________________ Dr. Douglas McGetchin ______________________________ Dean Jeffrey Buller, Wilkes Honors College ____________ Date i ABSTRACT Author: Michael Habib Title: Pan-Arabism and the United Arab Republic Institution: Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Christopher Ely Degree: Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences Concentration: History Year: 2016 This thesis seeks to analyze Pan-Arabism through the lens of the United Arab Republic. I argue that even though the UAR faced many internal issues, it ultimately failed due to external pressures. I argue this to provide a new perspective on the Middle East and the Arab world, by showing how it came to be as it is. I organize my thesis into four chapters: I. Introduction: Arab Unity and its Limits, II. The Marriage of Syria and Egypt, III.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Economic Integration: * the Missing Links PF FP
    Working Paper April 2010 Arab Economic Integration: * The missing links PF FP Bernard Hoekman (World Bank and CEPR) Khalid Sekkat (University of Brussels and ERF) Revised This version: April 2010 * P P An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Economic Research Forum workshop on Inequality and Regional Integration in the Arab World, November 21-22, 2008, Cairo, Egypt. We are grateful to the Groupe d’Economie Mondiale (Sciences Po, Paris) for support, to Catherine Mikhail for very helpful assistance, to Francis Ng and Aaditya Mattoo for sharing data, and to Caroline Freund, Ahmed Galal, Mustapha Nabli, Jeff Nugent, Subidey Togan and Jamel Zarrouk for helpful comments. The views expressed are personal and should not be attributed to the World Bank. 0 1. Introduction The idea of regional integration among Arab countries has been pursued for decades. Efforts to integrate regionally were started in the late 1950s, earlier than in any other developing region. All Arab states have concluded numerous agreements to reduce trade barriers on a preferential basis. Most of these have not had much of an economic impact. For a variety of reasons discussed in the literature, progress has been very slow, with 2 frequent reversals (Sekkat, 1996; Fawzy, 2003).PF F P Most of the analysis on the reasons for intra-Arab integration failures focused on the level of intra-regional trade in goods. The finding that intra-Arab trade in goods is “too low” is supposed to imply that the expected benefits from regional integration would be low and, hence, the incentive to achieve such integration weak.
    [Show full text]
  • United Arab Republic 1 United Arab Republic
    United Arab Republic 1 United Arab Republic ةدحتملا ةيبرعلا ةيروهمجلا Al-Gumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-Muttahidah Al-Jumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-MuttahidahUnited Arab Republic ← → 1958–1961 ← (1971) → ← → Flag Coat of arms Anthem Oh My Weapon[1] Capital Cairo Language(s) Arabic [2] Religion Secular (1958–1962) Islam (1962–1971) Government Confederation President - 1958–1970 Gamal Abdel Nasser United Arab Republic 2 Historical era Cold War - Established February 22, 1958 - Secession of Syria September 28, 1961 - Renamed to Egypt 1971 Area - 1961 1166049 km2 (450214 sq mi) Population - 1961 est. 32203000 Density 27.6 /km2 (71.5 /sq mi) Currency United Arab Republic pound Calling code +20 Al-Gumhuriyah al-Arabiyahةدحتملا ةيبرعلا ةيروهمجلا :The United Arab Republic (Arabic al-Muttahidah/Al-Jumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-Muttahidah), often abbreviated as the U.A.R., was a sovereign union between Egypt and Syria. The union began in 1958 and existed until 1961, when Syria seceded from the union. Egypt continued to be known officially as the "United Arab Republic" until 1971. The President was Gamal Abdel Nasser. During most of its existence (1958–1961) it was a member of the United Arab States, a confederation with North Yemen. The UAR adopted a flag based on the Arab Liberation Flag of the Egyptian Revolution of 1952, but with two stars to represent the two parts. This continues to be the flag of Syria. In 1963, Iraq adopted a flag that was similar but with three stars, representing the hope that Iraq would join the UAR. The current flags of Egypt, Sudan, and Yemen are also based on Arab Liberation Flag of horizontal red, white, and black bands.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Arab Economic Integration Ahmed Galal Bernard Hoekman
    01-3031-CH 1 3/21/03 2:24 PM Page 1 1 Between Hope and Reality: An Overview of Arab Economic Integration ahmed galal bernard hoekman rab economic integration (AEI) has been on the agenda of Arab A politicians and intellectuals and of interest to the Arab public at large for some fifty years. The force behind AEI has been the widely held belief that the formation of a united Arab economic bloc would strengthen the bargaining power of the region in an increasingly polarized world and offer its people the opportunity to achieve a better standard of living. During this period, several attempts at economic integration have been made. The Arab League, for example, was created in 1945, providing a potential institutional means of carrying out such a project. Fifty years later, however, AEI remains elusive, in contrast with the Euro- pean economic integration experiment, which began around the same time. European Community members succeeded in converting their vision into reality, while supporters of AEI remain hopeful. The divergence in the out- comes of the two experiments raises a host of questions. Were the expected economic gains from AEI so small as to preclude taking concrete and sys- tematic actions toward integration, or was it the absence of political incen- tives? Did the region lack the institutional mechanisms to carry out the pro- ject, or was it opposition from interest groups within individual countries 1 01-3031-CH 1 3/21/03 2:24 PM Page 2 that has prevented real progress to date? Looking ahead, what is the possi- ble impact of AEI on the welfare of the Arab countries involved? Are there any lessons to be drawn from the European Union (EU) experience for the Arab region, or are the two experiments so different that AEI must follow a unique path? These are the broad questions addressed in this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Nationalism from a Historical Perspective: a Gradual Demise?
    | 11 Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Arab Nationalism from a Historical Perspective: A Gradual Demise? İsmail KURUN1 Abstract Arab nationalism emerged as a secular ideology in the early 20th century in the Ottoman Empire. During the First World War, it proved influential enough to motivate an Arab rebellion against the Ottomans and, following the war, several Arab states were founded. Its popularity rose in the interwar period, and many Arab mandates became independent after the Second World War. Its popularity peaked at the hands of Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1958 when Syria and Egypt united to form the United Arab Republic. After the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, Arab nationalism began losing its appeal and declined dramatically during the 1970s and 1980s. At the turn of the 21st century, Arab nationalism became an almost irrelevant ideology in the Middle East. This study examines the birth, the dramatic rise, and the sudden decline of Arab nationalism from a historical perspective and concludes that Arab nationalism today, as an ideology, is on the brink of demise. Keywords: political history;Arab nationalism; pan-Arabism; Islam Tarihsel Perspektiften Arap Milliyetçiliği: Tedrici Bir Ölüm Mü? Özet Arap milliyetçiliği 20. yüzyılın başlarında Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda seküler bir ideoloji olarak ortaya çıktı. Birinci Dünya Savaşı sırasında Osmanlılara karşı bir Arap ayaklanmasını motive edecek kadar etkili oldu ve savaştan sonra birkaç Arap devleti kuruldu. Arap milliyetçiliğinin popülaritesi iki savaş arası dönemde yükseldi ve birçok Arap devleti İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonra bağımsız hale geldiler. 1958’de Suriye ve Mısır, Birleşik Arap Cumhuriyeti’ni kurmak için birleştiklerinde Arap milliyetçiliğinin popülaritesi zirve yaptı.
    [Show full text]
  • Unu-Cris Unu-Cris
    UNU -CRIS W ORKING PAPER SERIES #02 April 2021 Me UNU -CRIS dite W ORKING PAPER SERIES rran Mediterranean Lasagne of Migration Governance: ean UNU What- isCRIS the Way Forward for theLas Regions in Governing the agn W ORKING PAPER SERIES Euromestic Sphere? An EU- e of Centric Perspective Mig Zane Šime rati UNU -CRIS on W ORKING PAPER SERIES Gov www.cris.unu.edu EU-China Relations onAlice Food Marinelliern Securitywww.cris.unu.edu and Agri -Food anc UNU-CRIS Alice Marinelli Trade e: ORKING www.cris.unu.eduAPER ERIES W P S Alice Marinelli Wha www.cris.unu.edu t is the UNU-CRISwww.cris.unu.edu About the author: Ms Zane Šime did a research internship at UNU-CRIS throughout March 2020 – November 2020. She was working on the Regional Integration Knowledge System (RIKS) project under the supervision of Professors Glenn Rayp and Samuel Standaert. The most recent research interests of Zane Šime revolve around the EU science diplomacy towards the Southern Neighbourhood and the EU-India educational diplomacy in a broader context of the Asia- Europe Meeting. Zane has obtained professional experience as an international civil servant at the Secretariat of the Council of the Baltic Sea States and a national civil servant in Latvia. Zane holds a Master of Science in European Politics and Policies from KU Leuven (Belgium) and a master's degree in Political Science from the University of Latvia. Contact: [email protected] LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/zanesime 2 Acknowledgements: The author gratefully thanks UNU-CRIS Professorial Fellow Samuel Standaert for his supervisory support throughout the preparation of the Working Paper.
    [Show full text]
  • City, War and Geopolitics: the Relations Between Militia Political Violence
    City, war and geopolitics: the relations between militia political violence and the built environment of Beirut in the early phases of the Lebanese civil war (1975-1976) Sara Fregonese NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ---------- ----------------- 207 32628 4 ---------------------------- Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D in the School of Geography, Politics and Sociology Newcastle University May 2008 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk ORIGINAL COpy TIGHTLY BOUND IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk . PAGE NUMBERING AS ORIGINAL IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl,uk NO CD/DVD ATIACHED PLEASE APPLY TO THE UNIVERSITY Thesis abstract The thesis deals with the relationships between political violence and the built environment of Beirut during the early phases of the Lebanese civil war (1975-1976). It investigates how the daily practices of urban warfare and the urban built fabric impacted on each other, and specifically how the violent targeting of the built fabric relates to contested discourses of power and identity enacted by the urban militias. The study is the result of residential fieldwork in Beirut, where I held in-depth interviews with former militia combatants, media representatives, academics and practitioners in urban studies and architecture, as well as conducting archival search into bibliographical, visual and microfilm sources in Arabic, English and French. Official geopolitical discourses in international diplomacy about the civil war between 1975 and 1976 focused on nation-state territoriality, and overlooked a number of complex specifications of a predominantly urban conflict. This led occasionally to an oversimplification of the war and of Beirut as chaos.
    [Show full text]