Applications of Radiowave Propagation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Applications of Radiowave Propagation ECE 458 Lecture Notes on Applications of Radiowave Propagation Erhan Kudeki Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign January 2006 (Edited: Jan. 2010) Copyright c 2010 Reserved — No parts of these notes may be reproduced without permission from the author ! Introduction Apartially-ionizedandelectricallyconductinglayeroftheupperatmospherehelpedguid- ing Marconi’s radio signals across the Atlantic during his historic experiment of 1901. Since the existence of such a layer — the ionosphere —wasnotknownatthetime,the outcome of the experiment, a successful radio contact from Wales to Newfoundland, was abigsurpriseandsparkedanintenseresearchonwavepropagationandthemorphology of the upper atmosphere. Today, in the age of space travel, satellites, and wireless infor- mation networks, radio waves have become an essential element of how we communicate with one another across vast distances. These notes describe the physics and applications of radio waves and radiowave propagation within ionized gases enveloping our planet and solar system. Figure 0.1: Guglielmo Marconi with his receiving apparatus on Signal Hill, St. John’s, Newfoundland in December, 1901. (www3.ns.sympatico.ca/henry.bradford/marconi-newf.html) Acrucialaspectofanionizedgas—aplasma —forradiowavepropagationisthe number density N of its free electrons, which is distributed, in the Earth’s ionosphere, as shown in Figure 0.2. Ionospheric electron density N varies with altitude, latitude, longitude, local time, season, and solar cycle1 and impacts the propagation of ionospheric radiowaves in various ways. Since the response of free electrons to eE forcing depends − on the frequency f of the radiowave field E,thedetailsofionosphericpropagationis frequency dependent. At radio frequencies (see Figure 0.3) less than a critical plasma 111 year periodicity in solar energy output that correlates well with the number of visible sunspots on solar surface. Power flux from the sun maximizes in years with maximum sunspot counts (i.e., during “solar max”). 2 Figure 0.2: Typical height profiles of ionospheric electron density N and atmospheric temperature T ,andthenamesofdifferentatmospheric/ionosphericregions and layers. The actual distributions of N and T are highly variable in time and location and contain random components modeled by statistical meth- ods. Physical models for the average profile of N describe a balance between a solar-flux-dependent photo-ionization rate and a recombinational loss rate which is chemistry dependent. Photo-ionization rate proportional to both neutral gas density and ionizing radiation (EUV, X-ray) maximizes at some intermediate atmospheric height because density decreases and ionizing radi- ation flux from sun increases with increasing height. The wiggles in N-profile are due to different types and rates of recombination processes dominant at different height ranges. The ionosphere “survives the night” at different heights to different extents depending on recombination rates (D-region dis- appears but F-region densities are reduced by only an order of magnitude). 3 Figure 0.3: Radio spectrum and commonly used band names. Each band spans one decade of frequencies — e.g., VHF extends from 30 to c 300 MHz — and one decade of free space wavelength λ = f . (http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.html) frequency f √N the ionosphere becomes opaque2 and incident radiowaves from below p ∝ (or above) suffer total internal reflections. Radiowaves with frequencies larger than fp can penetrate the ionosphere but only with a f/fp dependent phase and group speeds. Hence, the medium is dispersive.Also,spatialvariationsofN and fp make the ionosphere an inhomogeneous propagation medium, causing refractions and the curving of ionospheric ray trajectories. Under the right conditions refracted ionospheric rays will curve back to the ground, establishing so-called “sky-wave” links beyond the horizon like in Marconi’s 1901 experiment. Radiowaves crossing the ionosphere suffer some attenuation or loss because of the collisions of ionospheric free electrons with neutral atoms and molecules. Electron collisions cause wave attenuation since during a collision the electron loses part of its kinetic energy borrowed from the radiowave in an irreversible way. The ionosphere also happens to be an anisotropic propagation medium because of an additional ev B force − × o on electrons, where Bo is the Earth’s DC magnetic field and v the electron velocity. As a consequence of this Lorentz force radiowave propagation speeds depend on the direction of wavenormal kˆ in relation to Bo,and,infact,propagationisonlypossibleforcertain polarizations, depending, again, on kˆ.Finally,electrondensityN in the ionosphere always contains a fluctuating component δN that varies randomly with position and time and scatters the radiowaves crossing the ionosphere. Scattered signals can be detected and analyzed by radar systems to study the morphology and dynamics of the upper atmosphere. The scattering process also causes a “twinkling effect” — called scintillations —onamplitudesandphasesofradiowavescrossingtheionosphere. The notes here provide an introductory account of the propagation phenomena high- lighted above after a brief review of Maxwell’s equations and their plane wave solutions 2 Plasma frequency fp √80.6N in MKS units as we will derive in Chapter 2. With a maximum value 12 3 ≈ of N 10 m− in the ionosphere, the maximum fp 9 MHz typically. Thus the ionosphere is ∼ ∼ typically opaque for radio frequencies less than 9 MHz. 4 in Chapter 1. Chapter 2 examines ionospheric propagation neglecting the effect of the Earth’s DC magnetic field and focusing on a vertical incidence geometry — dispersion, inhomogeneity, and absorption effects are introduced one at a time and discussed. Chap- ter 3 describes ionospheric the sky-wave links and also includes a discussion of refraction in the lowest layer of the neutral atmosphere, the troposphere.InChapter4wediscuss the tropospheric radio links following a study of radiation and reception properties of antennas. The chapter also includes discussions of antenna noise and radio imaging. The last two chapters are devoted to the most advanced topics of these notes: Chapter 5 de- scribes backscatter research radars used for the study of the lower and upper atmosphere and the ionosphere, whereas the topic covered in Chapter 6 is magnetoionic theory of anisotropic propagation effects in magnetized plasmas. Additional advanced topics in- cluding radiowave scintillations, surface-wave propagation, and the theory of ionospheric incoherent scatter are included as appendices. The notes are intended for an audience familiar with Maxwell’s equations and plane- waves from an introductory electromagnetics course. It is also expected that the student has familiarity with linear system theory (convolution, Fourier transforms, impulse) as well as the theory of random variables (pdf’s, expected values). Required concepts from plasma physics and atmospheric physics will be introduced in a “just-in-time” fashion and no attempt will be made for a complete coverage in those areas. Useful references (available in Engineering Library): 1. Rao, N. N., Elements of Engineering Electromagnetics, 1997, Prentice Hall 2. Bekefi, G. and A. H. Barret, Electromagnetic vibrations, waves, and radiation, 1984, MIT 3. Staelin, D. H., A. W. Morgenthaler, and J. A. Kong, Electromagnetic Waves, 1994, Prentice Hall 4. Collin, R. E., Antennas and radiowave propagation, 1985, McGraw Hill 5. Davies, K., Ionospheric radio, 1990, Peter Peregrinus 6. Yeh, K. C., and C. H. Liu, theory of ionospheric waves, 1972, Academic 7. Kelley, M. C., The Earth’s ionosphere, 1989, Academic 8. Kerr, D. E., Propagation of short radio waves, 1951, McGraw Hill 9. Jordan, E. C. and K. G. Balmain, Electromagnetic waves and radiating systems, 1968, Prentice Hall 10. Ramo, S., J. R., Whinnery, and T. Van Duzer, Fields and waves in communication electronics, 1964, Wiley 11. Burdic, W. S., Radar signal analysis, 1968, Prentice Hall 5 12. Levanon, N, Radar principles, 1988, Wiley-Interscience 13. Ratcliffe, J. A., The magneto-ionic theory, 1962, Cambridge 14. Budden, K. G., Propagation of radio waves, 1985, Cambridge 15. Gurnett, D. A., and A. Bhattacharjee, Introduction to plasma physics, 2005, Cam- bridge 6 Contents 1WavesolutionsofMaxwell’sequations 9 1.1 Electromagnetic fields and Maxwell’s equations . 9 1.2 Plane wave solutions . 11 1.3 Poynting vector . 16 1.4 Wave polarizations and orthogonality . 17 1.5 Non-uniform plane waves . 19 1.6 Plane wave reflection coefficients . 20 2Ionosphericpropagationandverticalsoundings 25 2.1 TEM plane waves in the upper-atmosphere . 25 2.2 Dispersion and group velocity . 30 2.3 Ionospheric dispersion and propagation . 33 2.4 Group delay, group path, and ionospheric TEC . 36 2.5 Phase delay, differential Doppler, and differential TEC . 40 2.6 WKB and full-wave solutions of propagation in inhomogeneous media . 41 2.7 Vertical incidence ionospheric sounding . 50 2.8 Ionospheric absorption . 55 3Radiolinksininhomogeneousmedia 62 3.1 Field solutions in plane stratified media . 62 3.2 Ray tracing in plane stratified media . 66 3.3 Eikonal equation and general ray tracing equations . 72 3.4 Ray tracing in spherical stratified media . 76 3.5 Tropospheric ducting . 83 3.6 Sky-wave links in a plane stratified ionosphere . 86 3.7 Effect of spherical geometry on sky-wave links . 95 3.8 Earth-ionosphere waveguide and ELF propagation . 96 4Radiation,antennas,links,imaging 100 4.1 Radiation
Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Information for an Amateur Radio Facility
    COMMONWEALTH O F MASSACHUSETTS C I T Y O F NEWTON SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMA TION FOR AN AMATEUR RADIO FACILITY ACCOMPANYING APPLICA TION FOR A BUILDING PERMI T, U N D E R § 6 . 9 . 4 . B. (“EQUIPMENT OWNED AND OPERATED BY AN AMATEUR RADIO OPERAT OR LICENSED BY THE FCC”) P A R C E L I D # 820070001900 ZON E S R 2 SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF: A LEX ANDER KOPP, MD 106 H A R TM A N ROAD N EWTON, MA 02459 C ELL TELEPHONE : 617.584.0833 E- MAIL : AKOPP @ DRKOPPMD. COM BY: FRED HOPENGARTEN, ESQ. SIX WILLARCH ROAD LINCOLN, MA 01773 781/259-0088; FAX 419/858-2421 E-MAIL: [email protected] M A R C H 13, 2020 APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTED BY ALEXANDER KOPP, MD TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Preamble ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 5 The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 USC § 332 et seq.) Does Not Apply ....................................... 5 The Station Antenna Structure Complies with Newton’s Zoning Ordinance .......................................... 6 Amateur Radio is Not a Commercial Use ............................................................................................... 6 Permitted by
    [Show full text]
  • Use of GIS in Radio Frequency Planning and Positioning Applications
    Use of GIS in Radio Frequency Planning and Positioning Applications Victoria R. Jewell Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering R. Michael Buehrer, Chair Peter M. Sforza Jeffrey H. Reed July 3, 2014 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: GIS, RF Modeling, Positioning Copyright 2014, Victoria R. Jewell Use of GIS in Radio Frequency Planning and Positioning Applications Victoria R. Jewell (ABSTRACT) GIS are geoprocessing programs that are commonly used to store and perform calculations on terrain data, maps, and other geospatial data. GIS offer the latest terrain and building data as well as tools to process this data. This thesis considers three applications of GIS data and software: a Large Scale Radio Frequency (RF) Model, a Medium Scale RF Model, and Indoor Positioning. The Large Scale RF Model estimates RF propagation using the latest terrain data supplied in GIS for frequencies ranging from 500 MHz to 5 GHz. The Medium Scale RF Model incorporates GIS building data to model WiFi systems at 2.4 GHz for a range of up to 300m. Both Models can be used by city planners and government officials, who commonly use GIS for other geospatial and geostatistical information, to plan wireless broadband systems using GIS. An Indoor Positioning Experiment is also conducted to see if apriori knowledge of a building size, location, shape, and number of floors can aid in the RF geolocation of a target indoors. The experiment shows that correction of a target to within a building's boundaries reduces the location error of the target, and the vertical error is reduced by nearly half.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing a Ham Radio
    Choosing a Ham Radio Your guide to selecting the right equipment Lead Author—Ward Silver, NØAX; Co-authors—Greg Widin, KØGW and David Haycock, KI6AWR • About This Publication • Types of Operation • VHF/UHF Equipment WHO NEEDS THIS PUBLICATION AND WHY? • HF Equipment Hello and welcome to this handy guide to selecting a radio. Choos- ing just one from the variety of radio models is a challenge! The • Manufacturer’s Directory good news is that most commercially manufactured Amateur Radio equipment performs the basics very well, so you shouldn’t be overly concerned about a “wrong” choice of brands or models. This guide is intended to help you make sense of common features and decide which are most important to you. We provide explanations and defini- tions, along with what a particular feature might mean to you on the air. This publication is aimed at the new Technician licensee ready to acquire a first radio, a licensee recently upgraded to General Class and wanting to explore HF, or someone getting back into ham radio after a period of inactivity. A technical background is not needed to understand the material. ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION After this introduction and a “Quick Start” guide, there are two main sections; one cov- ering gear for the VHF and UHF bands and one for HF band equipment. You’ll encounter a number of terms and abbreviations--watch for italicized words—so two glossaries are provided; one for the VHF/UHF section and one for the HF section. You’ll be comfortable with these terms by the time you’ve finished reading! We assume that you’ll be buying commercial equipment and accessories as new gear.
    [Show full text]
  • Custom Products
    Back to MiMixxerer Home Page CUSTOM PRODUCTS Table of Contents Introduction Detailed Data Sheets Questions & Answers 100 Davids Drive • Hauppauge, NY 11788 • 631-436-7400 • Fax: 631-436-7430 • www.miteq.com TABLETABLE OF CONTENTS OF CONTENTS (CONT.) CONTENTS CONTENTS MULTIPLIERS (CONT.) CUSTOM PRODUCTS Detailed Data Sheets Detailed Data Sheets (Cont.) Passive Frequency Doublers Low-Noise Block Downconverter Octave Bandwidth Four-Channel Downconverter Module Millimeter Five-Channel Downconverter Module CONTENTSMultioctave Bandwidth with Input RF Switch/Limiter CUSTOMDrop-In PRODUCTS and LO Amplifier/Divider ActiveCONTENTS Frequency Doublers Block Diagram of MITEQ 5-Channel Gain GeneralNarrow and Octave Bandwidth and Phase-Matched Front-End QuickIntDrop-InTION Reference Applications of Five-Channel Front Ends Millimeter Four-Channel 1 to 18 GHz TypicalMultioctaveCorporate Subsystem Bandwidth Overview Worksheet Image Rejection Downconverter Millimeter Three-Channel Mixer Amplifier UsefulActiveTechnology Multiplier System Assemblies Formulas Overview Direct Microwave Digital I/Q DetailedX2Specification Data Sheets Definitions Modulator System Millimeter Integrated Upconverter and Three-ChannelX3Quality Assurance LNA Downconverter Module Power Amplifier Low-NoiseMTBFMillimeter Calculations Block Downconverter Block Downconverter X4 Low-Noise Block Converter Four-ChannelManufacturingMillimeter Downconverter Flow Diagrams Module X-Band Low-Noise Block Converter Five-ChannelX5Device 883 DownconverterScreening Module Switched Power Amplifier Assembly
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Performance of Antenna Baluns
    Analysis and Performance of Antenna Baluns Lotter Kock Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electronic Engineering at the University of Stellenbosch Study Leader: Prof. K.D. Palmer April2005 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za - Declaration - "I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it at any university for a degree." Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Data transmission plays a cardinal role in today's society. The key element of such a system is the antenna which is the interface between the air and the electronics. To operate optimally, many antennas require baluns as an interface between the electronics and the antenna. This thesis presents the problem definition, analysis and performance characterization of baluns. Examples of existing baluns are designed, computed and measured. A comparison is made between the analyzed baluns' results and recommendations are made. 2 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Opsomming Data transmissie is van kardinale belang in vandag se samelewing. Antennas is die voegvlak tussen die lug en die elektronika en vorm dus die basis van die sisteme. Vir baie antennas word 'n balun, wat die elektronika aan die antenna koppel, benodig om optimaal te funktioneer. Die tesis omskryf die probleemstelling, analiese en 'n prestasie maatstaf vir baluns. Prakties word daar gekyk na huidige baluns se ontwerp, simulasie, en metings. Die resultate word krities vergelyk en aanbevelings word gemaak. 3 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank God for affording me this life.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Beam Antenna Feed-Line Options
    Light Beam Antenna Feed-line Options WB2LYL - Wayne A. Freiert This paper discusses three options that you have to connect your transceiver to your Light Beam Plus Antenna or Light Beam Antenna. The pros and cons of each option are also discussed. Also included is an explanation why feeding the antenna properly is important. Step-by-step Installation Instructions are also provided. The installation of any antenna and the performance of the antenna will vary from location to location. This variation is caused by differences in the ground conductivity, ground permitivity, the exact height of the antenna and the objects and topography near the antenna location. As a consequence, the Standing Wave Ratio (SWR) at the antenna feed-point will vary from one QTH to another. Also keep in mind that all Light Beam antennas are balanced antennas, similar to a ½ wave dipole. Most modern receivers, transmitters and transceivers are unbalanced. Therefore one must transition from balanced to unbalanced within the antenna system or the antenna performance will be adversely affected as well as radio frequency energy being carried into your shack on the outside of an unbalanced coaxial cable. To minimize SWR and the RF power loss that results, one either must alter the design of the antenna or utilize one of the following options. The Three Options Are: ♦ Balanced Feed-line Impedance Transformer: Using a ½ wavelength long Balanced Feed- line Transformer from the antenna, to a location below the antenna, to either a 1:1 Balun or a Coaxial Choke then using 50 Ohm Coaxial Cable to your transceiver.
    [Show full text]
  • ITU-R RECOMMENDATION F.1096 (09-1994) Methods of Calculating Line-Of-Sight Interference Into Radio-Relay Systems to Account
    Rec. ITU-R F.1096 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1096 METHODS OF CALCULATING LINE-OF-SIGHT INTERFERENCE INTO RADIO-RELAY SYSTEMS TO ACCOUNT FOR TERRAIN SCATTERING* (Question ITU-R 129/9) (1994) Rec. ITU-R F.1096 The ITU Radiocommunication Assembly, considering a) that interference from other radio-relay systems and other services can affect the performance of a line-of-sight radio-relay system; b) that the signal power from the transmitting antenna in one system may propagate as interference to the receiving antenna of another system by a line-of-sight great-circle path; c) that the signal power from the transmitting antenna in one system may propagate as interference to the receiving antenna of another system by the mechanism of scattering from natural or man-made features on the surface of the Earth; d) that terrain regions that produce the coupling of this interference may not be close to the great-circle path, but must be visible to both the interfering transmit antenna and the receive antenna of the interfered system; e) that the component of interference power that results from terrain scattering can significantly exceed the interference power that arrives by the great-circle path between the antennas; f) that efficient techniques have been developed for calculating the power of the interference scattered from terrain, recommends 1. that the effects of terrain scatter, when relevant, should be included in calculations of interference power when the interference is due to signals from the transmitting antenna of one system into the receiving antenna of another and when either or both of the following conditions apply (see Note 1): 1.1 there is a line-of-sight propagation path between the transmitting antenna of the interfering system and the receiving antenna of the interfered system; 1.2 there are natural, or man-made, features on the surface of the Earth that are visible from both the interfering transmit antenna and the interfered receive antenna; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Portable Twin-Lead 20-Meter Dipole
    By Rich Wadsworth, KF6QKI A Portable Twin-Lead 20-Meter Dipole With its relatively low loss and no need for a tuner, this resonant portable dipole for 14.060 MHz is perfect for portable QRP. first attempt at a portable problem is that its 300 ohm impedance to 70 ohms, a feed line that is an electri- dipole was using 20 AWG normally requires a tuner or 4:1 balun at cal half wave long will also measure 50 My speaker wire, with the leads the rig end. to 70 ohms at the transceiver end, elimi- simply pulled apart for the length re- But, since I want approximately a half nating the need for a tuner or 4:1 balun. 1 quired for a /2 wavelength top and the wavelength of feed line anyway, I decided To determine the electrical length of rest used for the feed line. The simplic- to experiment with the concept of mak- a wire, you must adjust for the velocity ity of no connections, no tuner and mini- ing it an exact electrical half wavelength factor (VF), the ratio of the speed of the mal bulk was compelling. And it worked long. Any feed line will reflect the im- signal in the wire compared to the speed (I made contacts)! pedance of its load at points along the of light in free space. For twin lead, it is Jim Duffey’s antenna presentation at the feed line that are multiples of a half wave- 0.82. This means the signal will travel at 1999 PacifiCon QRP Symposium made me length.
    [Show full text]
  • A Realistic Approach in Modeling Ad Hoc Networks
    Mohammad Siraj & Soumen Kanrar Performance of Modeling wireless networks in realistic environment Mohammad Siraj [email protected] Department of Computer Engineering College of Computer and Information Sciences) Riyadh-11543,SA Soumen Kanrar [email protected] Department of Computer Engineering College of Computer and Information Sciences) Riyadh-11543,SA Abstract: A wireless network is realized by mobile devices which communicate over radio channels. Since, experiments of real life problem with real devices are very difficult, simulation is used very often. Among many other important properties that have to be defined for simulative experiments, the mobility model and the radio propagation model have to be selected carefully. Both have strong impact on the performance of mobile wireless networks, e.g., the performance of routing protocols varies with these models. There are many mobility and radio propagation models proposed in literature. Each of them was developed with different objectives and is not suited for every physical scenario. The radio propagation models used in common wireless network simulators, in general researcher consider simple radio propagation models and neglect obstacles in the propagation environment. In this paper, we study the performance of wireless networks simulation by consider different Radio propagation models with considering obstacles in the propagation environment. In this paper we analyzed the performance of wireless networks by OPNET Modeler .In this paper we quantify the parameters such as throughput, packet received attenuation. Keywords: Throughput, attenuation, opnet, radio propagation model, packet, Simulation. 1. Introduction: Wireless communication technologies are undergoing very rapid advancements. In the past few years researcher have experienced a steep growth in the area of wireless networks in wireless domain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hertzian Dipole Antenna
    24. Antennas What is an antenna Types of antennas Reciprocity Hertzian dipole near field far field: radiation zone radiation resistance radiation efficiency Antennas convert currents to waves An antenna is a device that converts a time-varying electrical current into a propagating electromagnetic wave. Since current has to flow in the antenna, it has to be made of a conductive material: a metal. And, since EM waves have to propagate away from the antenna, it needs to be embedded in a transparent medium (e.g., air). Antennas can also work in reverse: converting incoming EM waves into an AC current. That is, they can work in either transmit mode or receive mode. Antennas need electrical circuits • In order to drive an AC current in the antenna so that it can produce an outgoing EM wave, • Or, in order to detect the AC current created in the antenna by an incoming wave, …the antenna must be connected to an electrical circuit. Often, people draw illustrations of antennas that are simply floating in space, unattached to anything. Always remember that there needs to be a wire connecting the antenna to a circuit. Bugs also have antennas. But not the kind we care about. not made of metal The word “antenna” comes from the Italian word for “pole”. Marconi used a long wire hanging from a tall pole to transmit and receive radio signals. His use of the term popularized it. The antenna used by Marconi for the first trans-Atlantic radio broadcast (1902) Guglielmo Marconi 1874-1937 There are many different types of antennas • Omnidirectional antennas – designed to receive or broadcast power more or less in all directions (although, no antenna broadcasts equally in every direction) • Directional antennas – designed to broadcast mostly in one direction (or receive mostly from one direction) Examples of omnidirectional antennas, typically used for receiving radio or TV broadcasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Antennas for Low-Power Wireless Applications by Audun Andersen Table 1
    Low-Power RF Texas Instruments Incorporated Selecting antennas for low-power wireless applications By Audun Andersen Table 1. Pros and cons for different antenna solutions Field Application Engineer, Low-Power Wireless ANTENNA TYPES PROS CONS Introduction PCB Antenna • Low cost • Difficult to design The antenna is a key component in an RF system and can • Good performance is small and efficient have a major impact on performance. High performance, possible antennas small size, and low cost are common requirements for • Small size is possible • Potentially large size many RF applications. To meet these requirements, it is at high frequencies at low frequencies important to implement a proper antenna and to charac- Chip Antenna • Small size • Medium performance terize its performance. This article describes typical • Medium cost antenna types and covers important parameters to Whip Antenna • Good performance • High cost consider when choosing an antenna. • Difficult to fit in many Antenna types applications Antenna size, cost, and performance are the most impor- Chip antennas tant factors to consider when choosing an antenna. The If the board space for the antenna is limited, a chip antenna three most common antenna types for short-range devices could be a good solution. This antenna type supports a are PCB antennas, chip antennas, and whip antennas. small solution size even for frequencies below 1 GHz. The Their pros and cons are shown in Table 1. trade-off compared to PCB antennas is that this solution PCB antennas will add materials and mounting cost. The typical cost of a Designing a PCB antenna is not straightforward and usually chip antenna is between $0.10 and $1.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Ku-Band Feed – Feeds Are Adjusted, No Antenna Movement
    Major Earth Station Equipment 6/10/5244 - 1 Major Earth Station Equipment . ANTENNA – Types – Parameters . Uplink – Modulation – Up-converters – Transmitters – Inter Facilities Link . RF Downlink – LNA / LNB – Down-converters – Demodulation – Inter Facilities Link 6/10/5244 - 2 Antenna . A satellite earth station antenna – An effective interface between the uplink equipment and free space – Must be directional to beam an RF signal to the satellite – Requires a clear line of sight between the antenna and the satellite Free space HPA Antenna Free space HPA 6/10/5244 - 3 Antenna 6/10/5244 - 4 ANTENNA . ANTENNA PARAMETERS: . GAIN . G (dBi) = 20.4 + 20 Log f + 20 Log D + 10 Log h . f = frequency in GHz . D = diameter in meters . h = antenna efficiency in decimal format . What should be the gain of a 9.3 m C-band antenna at 6.4GHz that is 62% efficiency ? . G = 20.4 + 20 Log 6.4 + 20 log 9.3 + 10 Log 0.62 . G = 20.4 + 20 ( .806179) + 20 ( .968482) + 10 ( -0.2076) . G = 20.4 + 16.12 + 19.37 - 2.08 . G = 53.81 dBi 6/10/5244 - 5 ANTENNA BEAMWIDTH: . For a given antenna, the higher the frequency the narrower the 3dB beamwidth. Therefore the receive band will be broader than the transmit. For a given frequency band the larger the antenna aperture the smaller or narrower the beamwidth. θ (deg.) = 21 f D f = frequency in GHz D = diameter in meters 6/10/5244 - 6 ANTENNA BEAMWIDTH: 6/10/5244 - 7 Antenna . Full Motion – Motorized o – Azimuth ± 180 from antenna center line (CL) – 5 - 90o – Tracking satellites in transfer orbit .
    [Show full text]