Private Equity VS. Health System Acquisitions of Physician Practices — Similarities and Differences in a Transaction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Private Equity VS. Health System Acquisitions of Physician Practices — Similarities and Differences in a Transaction Private Equity VS. Health System Acquisitions of Physician Practices — Similarities and Differences in a Transaction Lisa Atlas Genecov Katten Muchin Roseman LLP Roger W. Logan, MS, CPA/ABV, CMPE Bon Secours Mercy Health Jonathan Helm, CVA VMG Health Overview of Topics Trends in Health System and Private Equity Acquisitions of Physician Practices Primary Goals & Motivations Business Challenges & Considerations Structural & Regulatory Considerations Diligence & Focal Points Physician Compensation Models & FMV Considerations Trends in Health System and Private Equity Acquisitions of Physician Practices Jonathan Helm, CVA VMG Health Health System Physician Acquisition Trends Total Hospital-Employed Physicians Percent of Physicians Employed by Hospitals 180 (# '000s) 45.0% 42.0% 160 40.0% 38.0% 140 35.0% 31.0% 120 29.0% 30.0% 26.0% 100 25.0% 80 20.0% 60 15.0% 40 10.0% 20 5.0% - - 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total employed physicians increased 13.0% compounded annually, [from 95,000 in 2012 to 155,000 in 2016]. The total percentage of employed physicians has increased from 26.0% in 2012 to 42.0% in 2016. Source: : Physicians Advocacy Institute – “Physician Practice Acquisition Study” Health System Physician Acquisition Trends Key motivations for health systems to employ physicians are as follows: Clinical Alignment Reduces Costs by Reducing Variations of Care Improve Efficiency of Referral Networks Changing Reimbursement Models Tied to Quality Metrics Shift to Risk Based Contracting Requires Strong Physician Alignment Competitive Environment and Market Share Protection Continuum of Care Allows for Execution of System Goals Source: Physicians Advocacy Institute – “Physician Practice Acquisition Study”, American Medical Association – “Principles for Physician Employment”, New England Journal of Medicine – “Understanding the Physician Employment Movement” Private Equity Investment In Healthcare Available Capital Continues to Rise A recent McKinsey report estimates available capital (“dry powder”) has approached $1.8 trillion across all private markets1. Global Fundraising Trends 10.0% Available capital has increased each year on average since 2012 1 McKinsey defines private markets as closed-end funds investing in PEE, real estate, private debt, infrastructure, or natural resources, as well as related secondaries and funds of funds. McKinsey excludes hedge funds and publicly traded or open-end funds. Source: McKinsey & Company – “The rise and rise of private markets” Private Equity Investment In Healthcare Private Equity Focus on Healthcare Sector Why Focus on Healthcare? Healthcare accounts for nearly 20% of US “Regardless of what happens with GDP – projected to exceed $4 trillion in the ACA, the healthcare value spending by 2020 chain in the US and around the world is under continued pressure Has led all sectors in total returns since 1990 to reduce costs and operate more efficiently. Recognizing that, PE Favorable long-term trends: aging population, funds invested in all of the major growth in chronic conditions, push towards a healthcare sectors …” more efficient healthcare delivery system - Bain Global Healthcare Private Remains very fragmented Equity and Corporate M&A Internal Monetary Fund predicts $10 trillion in Report 2017 global healthcare spending by 2020 Private Equity Investments In Physician Groups Re-emergence of the Physician Roll-up Strategy There has been a strategy of consolidation with various specialties similar to the 1990s Primary Care Dermatology Ten years ago only a few private-equity houses had dedicated health-care teams,” says Dmitry Podpolny of Ophthalmology McKinsey. “Today nearly everyone does.” 2017 saw a Pain Management frenzy of deal activity, the highest by value since the go- go year of 2007 Orthopedic Surgery - Economist, Private Equity is Piling into Healthcare (August *Emergency Medicine 2018) *Radiology *Anesthesiology *Hospital-based Practices Private Equity Investments In Physician Groups Private Equity Interest Investment Firm Practice Specialty Year “It's a land-grab right now, these are very Chicago Growth Partners Advanced Pain Management Pain Management 2010 small companies that are really just getting Sentinel Capital Partners National Spine & Pain Center Pain Management 2010 Welsh, Carson, Anderson & started. They're going for crazy multiples US Anesthesia Partners Anesthesia 2011 Stowe just because [private-equity firms] see the Audax Group ADCS Dermatology 2011 Southern Anesthesia & Surgical potential there.” Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Co. Anesthesia 2012 Inc. –Todd Spaanstra, partner at Crowe Horwath Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Heartland Denta Dental 2012 Goldman Sachs Private Capital Privia Health Multi-Specialty 2013 • Multiples > 10-12x TTM EBTIDA not Harbour Capital Oak Street Health Primary Care 2013 uncommon for high-quality platforms Oxeon Village Practice Management Primary Care 2013 Venrock Aledade Primary Care 2013 practices Varsity Healthcare Partners Katzen Eye Group Ophthalmology 2014 OMERS Private Equity Forefront Dermatology Dermatology 2016 • Multiples sometimes generated by seeking GTCR Riverchase Dermatology Dermatology 2016 Harvest Partners ADCS Dermatology 2016 prospective compensation reductions from Ontario Municipal Retirement Varsity Healthcare Partners Dermatology 2016 physician owners Systems Audax Group Gastro Health Gastrology 2016 • Multiples further justified when add-on KG Health Partners, Inc. Access Foot Care, Inc Podiatry 2016 practices are purchased at multiples that are ABRY Partners Advanced Dermatologic Surgery Dermatology 2017 ABRY Partners Dermatology & Laser Center Dermatology 2017 30-40% less than those paid for platform Sheridan Capital Partners Dermatologists of Central States Dermatology 2017 practices – immediate arbitrage HIG Capital Barnet Dulaney Perkins & Mesa Ophthalmology 2017 HIG Capital Southwestern Eye Center Ophthalmology 2017 Waud Capital Partners Minnesota Eye Consultants Ophthalmology 2017 Source: Advance Healthcare Network Private Equity Investments In Physician Groups Is the PE Strategy Today Truly Different Than the 1990s? SEE FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITY IN PRACTICE ACQUISITIONS “ What is different is that these ROLLUP PRACTICES WITH VALUE DECLINE AND guys are operators. The ones INTENT TO ADD EVENTUAL BANKRUPTCY before were acquirers.” OPERATIONAL VALUE – Michael Parshall, medical practice consultant 1990s 2019 “ The problem with PhyCor is that only the bottom line matters to ACQUISITIONS CONSUMED WITH PROMISED them. Sometimes what’s good for UNDERPERFORM ACQUISITION EARNINGS the business isn’t necessarily good for the patient or the doctor” – Dr. Randall Bertolette, 1994 GROW TOO FAST TO PROPERLY MANAGE Will firms today PRACTICES stay adamant on not repeating mistakes of past? Source: Medical Economics, January 1994. “Should you sell your practice to Wall Street?” Private Equity Investments In Physician Groups Will the Model Succeed Today? FINANCIAL VALUE SUCCESS OF THE STRATEGY IS DEPENDENT ON THE LOYALTY OF PHYSICIANS Distribution Control Are physicians better off financially? Will shareholder Yes physicians continue to Cost Reduction work at historical CanCan private private equity equity production levels for the firmsfirms deliver deliver on on “promise” of equity returns earningsearnings repair? repair? Strategic Acquisition No Are firms delivering promised value- add? Will non-shareholder Strategic physicians continue as management employees or contemplate private practice again? OPERATIONAL VALUE Comparing and Contrasting Health System vs. Private Equity Opportunities and Challenges Roger W. Logan, MS, CPA/ABV, CMPE Bon Secours Mercy Health Private Equity Investments in Physician Related Services Retail Medicine Single Disease Focused Services • Dental • Pain/Spine • Veterinary • Orthopedics • Physical Therapy • Gastroenterology • Urgent Care • Women’s Health • Dermatology • Oncology • Ophthalmology • Urology • Fertility • Podiatry • Allergy • Primary Care • Anesthesia • Internal Medicine • Emergency • Multi-Specialty Medicine • Risk-Sharing • Radiology • Concierge • Hospitalists The Carlyle Medicine Group • Air Transport • Hospice Primary Care Hospital Outsourced Services Why Investor Interests in Physician Services? Attractive Sector for Private Equity Attractive Business Model • Fragmentation – Healthcare still remains ripe for • Employed physician model with consolidation consistency of compensation structures • Proven Track Record – Strong returns and continued • Presence of high margin ancillaries (e.g., lab, influx of capital pharmacy, products) • Industry Tailwinds – Projected healthcare spending • Ability to leverage providers with extenders by 2020 • Capitalize on brand recognition given the local • Attractive Model – Multiple reasons to befurther nature of care delivery discussed • Direct to consumer marketing & payor diversification (retail medicine) • Clear benefits of scale • Consolidation opportunity Consolidation Opportunity Clear Benefits of Scale • Ample runway for acquisitions in fragmented • Ability to build out and support full suite of ancillary markets, even within crowded subsectors services helps the economic model and also assists • Multiple arbitrage for add-ons allows sponsors to in recruiting buy down their blended multiples • Consolidation of back office support services • Aging owners and recent reimbursement cuts (e.g., billing, finance / accounting, scheduling, are increasing the willingness to sell HR) • Physicians out of residency / fellowship
Recommended publications
  • Richard West
    Richard H. West Counsel, Wilmington Mergers and Acquisitions Richard H. West advises public companies, private companies, private equity funds and their affiliated portfolio companies, and other clients on a broad range of corporate trans- actions, including acquisitions and dispositions, complex internal corporate restructuring transactions, distressed transactions, and the structuring and governance of limited liability companies and other alternative entities. Mr. West also advises clients on issues of Delaware law and general corporate and commercial matters. Representative transactions include: - Joyson Safety Systems (f.k.a, Key Safety Systems) in its acquisition of the global assets of Takata Corporation; - Armstrong World Industries in the spin-off of its flooring business segment, T: 302.651.3178 Armstrong Flooring; F: 302.574.3178 [email protected] - Highland Industries in connection with the sale of its defense and coating business to Tex-Tech Industries, an affiliate of Arlington Capital Partners; - Hanley Wood in connection with its acquisition by an affiliate of MidOcean Partners; Education - Amulet Capital Partners in the acquisition of SynteractHCR, a general contract research J.D., William and Mary School of Law, 2000 (William and Mary Law Review) organization serving the pharmaceutical industry, and Cu-Tech, LLC, a specialty contract research organization focused on dermatological indications; B.A., Yale University, 1997 - Peter Kiewit Sons’ Inc. and its affiliate, Walnut Creek Mining Company, in connection with the sale of Kiewit’s Calvert lignite mine to affiliates of The Blackstone Group and matters Bar Admissions relating to its associated fuel supply arrangements with Optim Energy; Delaware - Select Personnel in the recapitalization and sale of Select; - Corporation Service Company in its cross-border acquisition of the digital brand services division of Melbourne IT Limited; - Validus Holdings, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenged Funds – Case Study #1
    Challenged Funds – Case Study #1 Situation 1.1 A large, institutional real assets manager (“the GP”) has over $15 B in AUM, with a broadly diverse strategy/product set (approximately 7 different categories of investments, including North American opportunistic multifamily, gateway market core commercial, opportunistic commercial, value-add hospitality/leisure, value-add industrial, etc.). The firm is public, with most strategies operated as REITs and other publicly accessible vehicles, with a few private, commingled funds with institutional LPs The GP calls capital over a 3 year period as expected, yet seems to call more than a certain large LP’s total commitment amount. The LP detects this situation after a small overage, and stops funding future capital calls for a period of 6 months, and reaches out to the GP for clarification. The GP’s fund manager and CFO assure the LP that everything is correct and the capital calls should be funded Options: Should the LP…? A. Fund the capital calls – This is a large institutional GP with decades in the industry, many personnel, a great track record, and likely the LP’s fund accountants are in error, not the GP. Besides, the next fund is going to be raised soon, will likely be over-subscribed, and the LP wants full allocation B. Refuse to fund the capital calls, ask GP for full accounting – Can buy some time, give the GP the benefit of the doubt and allow them some time to come back with a full accounting/explanation of the situation C. Refuse to fund the capital calls, hire an outside advisor for a full accounting – Will take even more time, will cost additional expenses, but may get an independent view Contact – Tom Bratkovich [email protected] 916-747-1746 1 Situation 1.2 The LP decides to hire an outside advisor to assess the situation.
    [Show full text]
  • CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING Fall 2006
    Tuck School of Business Dartmouth College CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING Fall 2006 Professor Karin S. Thorburn Assistant Woodbury 311 Beth Perkins Phone: 646-2061 Woodbury 203 [email protected] 646-3412 Office hours: by appointment [email protected] Course Content and Objectives This course exposes students to a broad range of financial restructuring techniques that can be applied to improve business performance. Case discussion and visitors help illustrate how various corporate restructuring approaches may be used to increase firm value and highlight characteristics of potential candidates for different restructuring techniques. The case analysis provides ample opportunity to practice the application of standard corporate valuation methods. Students will gain a basic understanding of corpo- rate governance, with particular focus on agency problems and executive compensation issues. The first part of the course deals with financial restructuring techniques aimed at strengthening the firm’s competitive situation. Such restructurings can be initiated as a response to poor business performance caused by e.g. changes in technology or customer demand, or to avoid a takeover threat. Topics include divestitures, spinoffs, splitoffs, equity carveouts, tracking stock, leveraged recapitalizations, and leveraged buyouts. The second part focuses on the restructuring of financially distressed firms. Since bank- ruptcy provides a threat point for any distressed restructuring, the legal framework of the U.S. bankruptcy code is examined. The topics of this section are private workouts, pre- packaged bankruptcy filings and restructuring in bankruptcy. We will discuss the impor- tance of market mechanisms in resolving bankruptcy, including the role of distressed investors and difficulties in valuing bankrupt firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Musings on a Possible Brickman/Valleycrest Marriage
    Musings on a Possible Brickman/ValleyCrest Marriage Source: www.TurfMagazine.com "Follow the money." How many times have you heard that line in a movie or televised crime drama? The reason that it’s so common is because it’s so true. Money follows the "action" wherever the action is, and especially in putting together business deals, mergers or company buyouts. In terms of money the latest revelation of a possible business deal in the landscape industry could turn out to be a whopper. On April 24 the Financial Times reported that KKR, New York-based Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., the owners of The Brickman Group, is in talks to purchase ValleyCrest from Michael Dell’s MSD Capital, also based in New York. KKR is a global investment firm founded by founded by Jerome Kohlberg, Jr., Henry Kravis and George R. Roberts (Kravis and Roberts are cousins). Since it’s founding in 1976 it has completed more than $400 billion in private equity transactions. In its latest quarterly report on April 24, it reported assets under management of $108 billion. Along with The Brickman Group, other well-known U.S.-based "portfolio partner" companies under KKR’s umbrella include Go Daddy and ToysRUs,Inc. It also has controlling interest in companies in Germany, the United Kingdom, China, The Netherlands, Vietnam, Singapore, Japan, Australia, France, India, Turkey, Malaysia and Taiwan. KKR is truly a global company with 13 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. The rapidity with which KKR is moving within the industry is one of the most surprising aspects of this potential transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Ashley Tison Deck
    www.ozpros.com Special offer - Go to ozpros.com/save50 1 Copyright OZE, Inc. © 2020 The What – What is a Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) and Where are the QOZs Interactive map available on: opportunitydb.com/map 2 Copyright OZE, Inc. © 2020 Opportunity Zones – Three Ultimate Benefits Temporary Step Up In Basis Any investment in a Deferral QOF held for 5 years Capital Gains from the gets a tax basis increase sale of any asset (if of 10%. This means that reinvested within 180 when the taxes are paid days) are deferred until on the original capital the sale of the new gain in April of 2027, investment or December the amount paid will 31,2026 be 10% less. Permanent Exclusion – Step Up In Basis to Fair Market Value Investments held for 10 years will pay no capital gains tax on the post acquisition gains and will also avoid depreciation recapture. 3 Copyright OZE, Inc. © 2020 OZ v Conventional Investment Capital Gain of $1MM Reinvested in 2020 Period Qualified Opportunity Zone Business Conventional Investment Day 1 $1mm Investment $762,000 Investment (deferred Cap Gains Tax) Year 5 10% reduction in Cap Gains Tax No Tax Benefit (Savings of $23,800) January 1, 2027 Tax due on initial investment of approximately No Tax Benefit $214,200 Year 10 $1,785,800 payout $1,161,288 pay out post tax. IRR: 4.8% ($2mm - $214,200 distribution/loans made in 2027) IRR: 6.8% If held for 10 years, the after-tax return at sale is 53.8% greater. An additional $624,512 for the QOF Investment The following example is intended to show the general benefits of a proper, qualifying investment of a $1.0 million capital gain in a QOF compared to another otherwise identical investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Soaring Private Equity Investment in the Healthcare Sector
    S O A R I N G P R I V A T E E Q U I T Y I N V E S T M E N T I N T H E H E A L T H C A R E S E C T O R : C O N S O L I D A T I O N A C C E L E R A T E D , C O M P E T I T I O N U N D E R M I N E D , A N D P A T I E N T S A T R I S K RICHARD M. SCHEFFLER LAURA M. ALEXANDER JAMES R. GODWIN M A Y 1 8 , 2 0 2 1 AUTHORS Richard M. Scheffler is a Distinguished Professor of Health Economics and Public Policy in the Graduate Schools of Public Health and Goldman School of Public Policy at UC Berkeley and Director of the Nicholas C. Petris Center on Health Care Markets and Consumer Welfare (petris.org) at UC Berkeley. Corresponding author, [email protected]. Laura M. Alexander is Vice President of Policy, American Antitrust Institute (AAI). AAI is an independent non-profit education, research, and advocacy organization. Its mission is to advance the role of competition in the economy, protect consumers, and sustain the vitality of the antitrust laws. For more information, see www.antitrustinstitute.org. James R. Godwin is a researcher at the Nicholas C. Petris Center on Health Care Markets and Consumer Welfare and a PhD Candidate in Health Policy & Management at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series on the Return to Venture
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ON THE RETURN TO VENTURE CAPITAL Boyan Jovanovic Balàzs Szentes Working Paper 12874 http://www.nber.org/papers/w12874 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2007 We thank A. Dittmar, I. Guler, J. Ritter, S. Woodward and Y. Yafeh for data and comments, M.A. Campo-Rembado, W. Fuchs, R. Hall, N. Kyotaki, A. Ljungqvist, C. Michelacci, J. Stein, M. Ueda, L. White and S. Woodward for comments, the NSF for support and A. Gavazza, V. Tsyrennikov, and M. Kredler for ably estimating the model and providing comments on the entire paper. We also thank the NSF and the Kauffman Foundation for support. Appendix B was written by Matthias Kredler. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2007 by Boyan Jovanovic and Balàzs Szentes. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. On the Return to Venture Capital Boyan Jovanovic and Balàzs Szentes NBER Working Paper No. 12874 January 2007, Revised September 2007 JEL No. G24,L26 ABSTRACT We provide a model that links the high return to venture equity to the impatience of the VCs. VCs are scarce, and hence, they have market power and a high return on their investments. As a result, VCs are eager to terminate non-performing ventures so they can move on to new ones. The scarcity of VCs enables them to internalize their social value, and the competitive equilibrium is socially optimal.
    [Show full text]
  • National Elevator Industry Pension Fund V. Verifone Holdings, Inc., Et Al
    1 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 2 ELI R. GREENSTEIN (217945) 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 3 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415/288-4545 4 415/288-4534 (fax) [email protected] 5 – and – PATRICK J. COUGHLIN (111070) 6 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 7 Telephone: 619/231-1058 619/231-7423 (fax) 8 [email protected] 9 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY ) Master File No. 3:07-cv-06140-MHP PENSION FUND, ) 13 ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, ) 14 ) SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED vs. ) COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE 15 ) FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC., DOUGLAS ) 16 G. BERGERON, BARRY ZWARENSTEIN, ) PAUL PERIOLAT, WILLIAM G. ) 17 ATKINSON and CRAIG A. BONDY, and All ) Others Similarly Situated, ) 18 ) Defendants. ) 19 ) ) 20 In re VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) 21 ) ) 22 This Document Relates To: ) ) 23 ALL ACTIONS. ) ) 24 25 26 27 28 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 4 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE .................................................................................... 13 5 III. THE PARTIES ............................................................................................................. 13 6 IV. CONFIDENTIAL WITNESSES................................................................................... 17 7 V. BACKGROUND LEADING UP TO THE CLASS PERIOD.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Private Equity Chapter 1-R18
    1-5 GLOSSARY OF VENTURE CAPITAL § 1.02 § 1.02 Glossary of Terms -#- 401(K) Plan: A type of qualified retirement plan in which employees make salary reduced, pre-tax contributions to an employee trust. In many cases, the employer will match employee contributions up to a specified level. -A- “A” Round: A financing event whereby venture capitalists invest in a company that was previously financed by founders and/or angels. The “A” is from Series “A” Preferred stock. See “B” round. Accredited Investor: Defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D, an individ- ual (i.e., non-corporate) “accredited investor” is a either a natural person who has individual net worth, or joint net worth with the person’s spouse, that exceeds $1 million at the time of the purchase OR a natural person with income exceeding $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with a spouse exceeding $300,000 for those years and a reasonable expectation of the same income level in the current year. For the complete definition of accredited investor, see the SEC website. Accrued Interest: The interest due on preferred stock or a bond since the last interest payment was made. Acquisition: The process of gaining control, possession or ownership of a private portfolio company by an operating company or conglomerate. ACRS: Accelerated Cost Recovery System. The IRS approved method of calculating depreciation expense for tax purposes. Also known as Accel- erated Depreciation. Adjustment Condition: An adjustment condition occurs if the company does not close on an equity investment in the company for a minimum of $xxx, net of brokerage fees, on or before a series of other predetermined events, i.e., delivery of term sheet to preferred stockholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter D. Park
    Peter D. Park Associate T: +1.213.455.7629 333 South Hope Street F: +1.917.438.6186 Forty-Third Floor [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90071 Peter Park is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles office. Areas of Practice Peter’s practice focuses on advising private and public companies, private equity funds and their portfolio companies on a broad range of corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, minority investments, joint ventures, equity arrangements and corporate governance matters. Experience Mergers and Acquisitions Technology and Telecommunications: ■ Represented a private equity fund in its $4.3 billion acquisition of a publicly traded company’s technology platform. ■ Represented a private equity fund in its acquisition of a developer of electronic medical record and revenue cycle management software. ■ Represented a private equity fund in its $310 million acquisition of a developer of accounting software for oil and gas companies. ■ Represented a private equity fund in its acquisition of a developer of mobile traffic management software. ■ Represented a private equity fund in its acquisition of an early stage manufacturer of night vision sensors. ■ Represented a private equity fund in its acquisition of a provider of prison telecommunication services. Consumer Products/Food and Beverage/Business Services: ■ Represented a private equity fund in its $525 million sale of a casual dining restaurant chain. ■ Represented a private equity fund in its acquisition of an operator of home improvement consumer shows. ■ Represented a private equity fund in the sale of its portfolio company, an operator of convenience stores and gas stations.
    [Show full text]
  • CAFR) on the SERS Fund for Calendar Year 2009
    inside keystone @ 40% Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System ® Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the year ended December 31, 2009 09 A Component Unit of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the year ended December 31, 2009 Prepared by the staff of the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System Leonard Knepp Executive Director Anthony J. Faiola Chief Financial Officer State Employees’ Retirement System 30 North Third Street, Suite 150 Harrisburg, PA 17101-1716 A Component Unit of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania inside keystone @ 40% Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System 30 North Third Street, Suite 150 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101-1716 Telephone: 717-787-9657 www.sers.state.pa.us ® Nicholas J. Maiale Chairman May 28, 2010 Honorable Edward G. Rendell, Governor Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Members, Pennsylvania General Assembly Members, Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System Dear Governor Rendell, Legislators and Members: The Board of the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System (SERS) is pleased to present our Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) on the SERS Fund for calendar year 2009. The CAFR provides us with a vehicle to compile and publicly disclose extensive financial, investment and actuarial reports with introductions from SERS management and the Fund’s consulting actuary. This report reflects a recovery in SERS’ investment performance in 2009. The SERS Fund achieved a 9.1% return for the calendar year. The Fund’s 2009 performance exceeded the assumed rate of return, which is 8%. This marks the 11th time in the last 15 years that SERS has out-performed its assumed rate of return.
    [Show full text]
  • Buyer Brochure
    BB UU YY EE RR BB RR OO CC HH UU RR EE Valufinder Group, Inc. 95 Horatio Street Suite 301 New York, NY 10014 USA Telephone: 212-243-1133 Fax: 212-243-1838 Email: [email protected] http://www.valufindergroup.com Copyright © Valufinder Group, Inc. 2004. All Rights Reserved. ABOUT VALUFINDER 1 At A Glance 2 Our Team 3 - 4 Referrals 5 - 7 Careers 8 FOR BUYERS 9 Problems Buyers Face 10 - 11 The Valufinder Solution 12 Valufinders Methodology 13 - 14 Data Accumulation 15 - 16 Matching Buyers & Sellers 17 - 18 Completing Transactions 19 – 20 Retained Searches 21 The Valufinder Difference 22 Initial Stage 23 Candidate Identification 24 Candidate Contact 25 - 27 Additional Information 28 - 29 Partial Client List 30 NEWS & TRANSACTIONS 31 Select Transactions 32 - 36 Case Studies 37 Private Sellers 38 - 43 Corporate Divestitures 44 - 49 Add-on Acquisitions 50 - 55 Company News 56 - 59 CONTACT US 60 Copyright © Valufinder Group, Inc. 2004. All Rights Reserved. For over a quarter century, buyers and owners in the middle market have relied on Valufinder's experience and acumen to reach the goal of a fair and equitable transaction. At Valufinder, we take the time to understand the objectives of the owner and the acquisition criteria of the buyer, in order to provide realistic and appropriate opportunities, while striving to give honest, intelligent and objective advice. Valufinder is clearly the most talented and prolific deal initiator I've worked with in my career. Valufinder Group is distinctive because of their intelligence and creativity in developing proprietary ideas. They are tireess. I can't think of anyone better at origination than Valufinder.
    [Show full text]