Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis 2 Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis 2 Table of Contents Table Of Contents 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE WATERSHED ANALAYSIS OBJECTIVES 9 CHAPTER TWO CHARACTERIZATION 11 INTRODUCTION 11 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION 11 LANDSCAPE OWNERSHIP, ALLOCATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES 14 CORE TOPICS 14 GEOLOGIC FEATURES/GEOMORPHIC PROCESSES 14 Regional Geology and Tectonic Setting 15 Localized Geology 15 Geologic Units of the Upper Lemolo, Diamond Lake Watershed Analysis Area 15 Surficial Deposits 17 Geomorphic Processes 20 SOIL 21 Watershed Soil Development and Parent Material 21 Identifying the soils of the Watershed 21 HYDROLOGY 23 LAKES 29 LEMOLO LAKE 29 Physical Habitat 29 Water Quality 32 DIAMOND LAKE 37 Physical Habitat 37 Water Quality 39 Subalpine Lakes 60 Physical Habitat 60 Water Quality 61 STREAM CHANNEL 64 Poole Creek 68 North Umpqua River 69 Spring River 69 Bradley Creek 70 Warrior Creek 70 Tolo Creek 71 Lake Creek 71 Thielsen Creek 72 Sheep Creek 72 Silent Creek 72 VEGETATION 73 Coarse Woody Material 73 Fire Disturbance 76 Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive Plant Species 76 Noxious Weeds 76 SPECIES AND HABITATS 76 Wildlife And Human Interactions 76 HUMAN USES 81 Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis 2 Table of Contents Recreation 81 Diamond Lake Recreation Area 82 The Lemolo Lake Recreation Area 85 Wilderness/OCRA 87 Dispersed/Other 87 Trails 88 Visuals 88 Forest Products 88 CHAPTER THREE ISSUES AND KEY QUESTIONS 89 INTRODUCTION 89 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 89 ISSUES 89 ISSUES AND KEY QUESTIONS 90 Timber Harvest/Sustained Yield/Site Productivity 90 Transportation System/Forest Service Road Management 90 Water Quality and Fisheries 91 Recreation 91 Diamond Lake 91 Lemolo Lake 91 Other Areas 91 Wilderness 92 Wildlife 92 Vegetation Management 92 Fire Disturbance 92 Heritage Resources 92 CHAPTER FOUR REFERENCE AND CURRENT CONDITION, SYNTHESIS, AND INTERPRETATION 93 INTRODUCTION 93 CORE TOPICS 93 GEOLOGIC FEATURES/GEOMORPHIC PROCESSES/SOIL 93 Reference Conditions 93 Current Condition 95 SOIL 96 HYDROLOGY 97 Floods 100 Low Flows 101 Water Quality 102 Water Quality Standards 104 LAKES 105 LEMOLO LAKE 105 Water Quality And Species Habitat 105 DIAMOND LAKE 107 Water Quality And Species Habitat 107 SUBALPINE LAKES 121 Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis Table Of Contents 3 Current Conditions in Calamut, Lucille, and Maidu Lakes 121 Reference Conditions 121 Projected Future Conditions 121 STREAM CHANNELS 121 VEGETATION 125 Sensitive Plant Species 125 Noxious Weeds 126 Vegetative Structure and Pattern 127 Coarse Woody Material 130 Fire Disturbance 131 SPECIES AND HABITATS 141 Resident Fish Species and Habitat 141 Insects and Pathogens 147 Resident Terrestrial Species 152 HUMAN USES 160 Recreation 160 Human Occupation 178 Forest Products 182 Transportation System 187 CHAPTER FIVE RECOMMENDATIONS AND ANSWERS TO THE KEY QUESTIONS 195 INTRODUCTION 195 Timber Harvest/Sustained Yield/Site Productivity 195 Transportation System/Road Management 200 Water Quality and Fisheries 209 Recreation 209 Diamond Lake 209 Lemolo Lake 213 Other Areas 215 Wilderness 217 Wildlife 218 Vegetation 219 Fire Disturbance 219 Heritage Resources 228 CHAPTER SIX LIST OF PREPARERS 231 CHAPTER SEVEN REFERENCES 235 Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis 4 Table of Contents List of Figures FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP OF THE LEMOLO-DIAMOND LAKE WATERSHED ANALYSIS AREA. 12 FIGURE 2. LAND ALLOCATIONS 13 FIGURE 3. GEOTERRAIN 16 FIGURE 4. DIAGRAM OF ADSORPTION AND CAPILLARY EFFECT IN SANDY SOILS (DEPICTION ADAPTED FROM HILLEL 1980.) 23 FIGURE 5. CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA AT LEMOLO LAKE (MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION DATA FROM 1978-96 AND MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE DATA FROM 1978-95, FROM U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE 1997B). 25 FIGURE 6. CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA AT DIAMOND LAKE (MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION DATA FROM 1980-96 AND MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE DATA FROM 1987-96, FROM U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE 1997B). 25 FIGURE 7. COMPARISON OF MEAN MONTHLY ADJUSTED FLOW OF THE NORTH UMPQUA RIVER BELOW LEMOLO LAKE (1968-1996) AND MEAN MONTHLY PRECIPITATION AT LEMOLO (1978-1996) (U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE 1997B). 26 FIGURE 8. COMPARISON OF MEAN MONTHLY FLOW OF LAKE CR. AT DIAMOND LAKE (1923- 1984) AND PRECIPITATION AT DIAMOND LAKE (1980-1996). 27 FIGURE 9. SECCHI DISK TRANSPARENCY IN DIAMOND LAKE 52 FIGURE 10. FLOW DURATION CURVES 65 FIGURE 11. LEMOLO/DIAMOND LAKE 5TH AND 6TH FIELD WATERSHEDS ABOVE LEMOLO DAM.67 FIGURE 12. PLANT SERIES 74 FIGURE 13. PLANT SERIES/ECOCLASS 75 FIGURE 14. DIAMOND LAKE RECREATION AREA 83 FIGURE 15. LEMOLO LAKE RECREATION AREA 86 FIGURE 16. COMPARISON OF 1997 SUMMER FLOW DISCHARGE TO DRAINAGE AREA FOR SELECTED STREAMS IN THE LEMOLO/DIAMOND LAKE WATERSHED.LINER REGRESSION AND R2 INCLUDED TO SHOW A LINEAR RELATIONSHIP, WHERE Y IS EQUAL TO LOW FLOW IN CFS AND X IS DRAINAGE ARE IN SQUARE MILES. 99 FIGURE 17. ANNUAL FALL LOW FLOWS, NORTH UMPQUA RIVER, BELOW LEMOLO GAGE NO. 14313500 (DATA FROM 1928-1954). 102 FIGURE 18. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION RATES (SAR) FOR DIAMOND LAKE SEDIMENTS COMPUTED USING THE CRS MODEL OF APPLEBY AND OLDFIELD (1978) AS MODIFIED BY BINFORD (1990) FOR OLD AGE DATES. THE ESTIMATED LONG-TERM SAR RANGE PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT, BASED ON 14C DATING, IS SHOWN AS A VERTICAL BAR 110 FIGURE 19. PERCENT ABUNDANCE OF THE EIGHT MOST ABUNDANT DIATOM TAXA IN DIAMOND LAKE SEDIMENTS 111 FIGURE 20. THE PROPORTION OF DIATOM COMMUNITY CLASSIFIED IN DIAMOND LAKE PLOTTED AGAINST DEPTH IN SEDIMENT (CM). THE GROUPS OF DIATOMS ARE EPIPHYTES (), ATTACHED (), PLANKTONIC(), AND TYCOPLANKTONIC(). 112 FIGURE 21. HISTORIC STAND STRUCTURE 128 FIGURE 22. CURRENT STAND STRUCTURE 129 Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis Table Of Contents 5 FIGURE 23. NUMBER OF FIRES BY CAUSE BY DECADE 135 FIGURE 24. FUEL MODEL DISTRIBUTIONS 137 FIGURE 25. WILDLIFE 156 FIGURE 26. TIMBER HARVEST BY DECADE 183 Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis 6 Table of Contents List of Tables TABLE 1. LAND ALLOCATIONS 14 TABLE 2. WATER QUALITY COLLECTED FROM LEMOLO LAKE, JUNE 1992 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1994 35 TABLE 3. DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN LEMOLO LAKE 36 TABLE 4. PH IN LEMOLO LAKE 36 TABLE 5. CHLOROPHYLL CONCENTRATION (G/L) IN STREAMS NEAR LEMOLO LAKE 36 TABLE 6. FISHERY CHARACTERISTICS IN LEMOLO LAKE 37 TABLE 7. MORPHOMETRY OF DIAMOND LAKE 38 TABLE 8. CONCENTRATIONS OF PHOSPHORUS (G/L) IN DIAMOND LAKE 41 TABLE 9. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF 66 CASCADE LAKES 42 TABLE 10. PHOSPHOROUS LOADING TO DIAMOND LAKE IN KG/YR. 42 TABLE 11. AMMONIA (NH3-N), NITRATE (NO3-N) AND TOTAL INORGANIC NITROGEN (TIN) CONCENTRATIONS IN DIAMOND LAKE (G/L). 43 TABLE 12. TOTAL INORGANIC NITROGEN/TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS (MASS RATIO) 44 TABLE 13. INORGANIC NITROGEN BUDGET (KG/YR) FOR DIAMOND LAKE 44 TABLE 14. SILICA IN DIAMOND LAKE 45 TABLE 15. ION CHEMISTRY OF DIAMOND LAKE 47 TABLE 16. TROPHIC STATE CLASSIFICATION OF DIAMOND LAKE 49 TABLE 17. CARBON 14 PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY RATES FOR SELECTED CASCADE LAKES 50 TABLE 18. CHLOROPHYLL IN DIAMOND LAKE 51 TABLE 19. SECCHI DISK TRANSPARENCY IN DIAMOND LAKE 53 TABLE 20. SECCHI DISK TRANSPARENCY VERSUS PHYTOPLANKTON DENSITY AND BIOVOLUME IN DIAMOND LAKE 54 TABLE 21. DOMINANT PHYTOPLANKTON GENERA IN DIAMOND LAKE BASED ON NUMERICAL ABUNDANCE (CELLS/ML) 56 TABLE 22. SEASONAL DOMINANCE OF PHYTOPLANKTON TAXA FOR DIAMOND LAKE BASED ON NUMERICAL ABUNDANCE (CELLS/ML) 57 TABLE 23. PLANKTON ABUNDANCE IN DIAMOND LAKE (STATION D, CENTER) BASED ON BIOVOLUME. 59 TABLE 24. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUB-ALPINE LAKES IN THE LEMOLO LAKE WATERSHED 63 TABLE 25. CHEMISTRY OF THE SUB-ALPINE LAKES IN THE UMPQUA NATIONAL FOREST 63 TABLE 26. ESTIMATED MILES OF STREAM BY STREAM CLASS AND SUB-WATERSHED FOR THE LEMOLO/DIAMOND LAKE WATERSHED 66 TABLE 27. ESTIMATED RIPARIAN RESERVE ACRES BY SUB-WATERSHED FOR THE LEMOLO/DIAMOND LAKE WATERSHED. 68 TABLE 28. SUMMARY OF SUMMER 1997 LOW FLOW DISCHARGE TO DRAINAGE AREA.. 98 Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis Table Of Contents 7 TABLE 29. WATER TEMPERATURES (F) FROM MONITORED STREAMS IN THE LAKE CREEK DRAINAGE. 104 TABLE 30. ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY VALUES FOR FIXED TROPHIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 116 TABLE 31. ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY VALUES FOR OPEN TROPHIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 117 TABLE 32. TROPHIC STATE INDEX (TSI) AND ITS ASSOCIATED PARAMETERS 118 TABLE 33. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF OLIGOTROPHIC AND EUTROPHIC LAKES AND RESERVOIRS IN THE TEMPERATE ZON 119 TABLE 34. RESULTS OF PFANKUCH STREAM SURVEY FOR SELECTED ELEMENTS. VALUES ARE THE MEAN OF THE ELEMENTS WITH ALL REACHES OF THE IDENTIFIED STREAM CHANNEL. 123 TABLE 35. SUMMARY OF FISHERIES SURVEYS OF STREAMS IN LEMOLO/DIAMOND LAKE WATERSHED. 124 TABLE 36. VEGETATIVE STRUCTURAL CLASSES OF VEGETATION IN THE WATERSHED. 127 TABLE 37. AVERAGE FIRE RETURN INTERVAL IN YEARS 134 TABLE 38. SUMMARY OF DIAMOND LAKE RANGER DISTRICT FISH STOCKING RECORDS FROM THE PERIOD 1927 TO 1941 FOR STREAMS AND MOUNTAIN LAKES WITHIN THE ANALYSIS AREA. 144 TABLE 39. SUMMARY OF KNOWN SPOTTED OWL TERRITORIES AND SUITABLE HABITAT WITHIN THE LEMOLO/DIAMOND LAKE WATERSHED. 157 TABLE 40. DISTRIBUTION OF THE NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL HOME RANGES LOCATED IN THE LEMOLO/DIAMOND LAKE WATERSHED. 158 TABLE 41. PERSONS AT ONE TIME CAPACITY - DIAMOND LAKE RECREATION AREA 165 TABLE 42. WATER RIGHTS IN THE DIAMOND LAKE RECREATION AREA 166 TABLE 43. 1997 SITE OCCUPANCY - USFS DIAMOND LAKE AREA CAMPGROUNDS 167 TABLE 44. ACTIVITY OCCASIONS/VISITORS IN 1997- DIAMOND LAKE RECREATION AREA 168 TABLE 45. PERSONS AT ONE TIME (PAOT) CAPACITY - LEMOLO LAKE RECREATION AREA 169 TABLE 46. 1997 ACTIVITY OCCASIONS/VISITORS - LEMOLO LAKE RECREATION AREA 170 TABLE 47. OCRA CLASSIFICATION AND USE 171 TABLE 48. CAMPGROUND OCCUPANCY 1989 - 1997 FOR MAJOR CAMPGROUND FACILITIES 174 TABLE 49. DISTRIBUTION OF REGENERATION HARVEST BY SUB-WATERSHED 184 TABLE 50. AVAILABLE PLANT SERIES BY SUB-WATERSHED, ADJUSTED FOR UNMAPPED RIPARIAN RESERVE AND GREEN TREE RETENTION 185 TABLE 51. ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF SPECIAL FOREST PRODUCTS HARVEST ANNUALLY 186 TABLE 52. MILES OF ROAD CONSTRUCTED BY DECADE 188 TABLE 53. MILES OF ROAD BY SURFACE TYPE 189 TABLE 54.
Recommended publications
  • Fate and Behavior of Rotenone in Diamond Lake, Oregon, Usa Following Invasive Tui Chub Eradication
    Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 1650–1655, 2014 # 2014 SETAC Printed in the USA FATE AND BEHAVIOR OF ROTENONE IN DIAMOND LAKE, OREGON, USA FOLLOWING INVASIVE TUI CHUB ERADICATION BRIAN J. FINLAYSON,*y JOSEPH M. EILERS,z and HOLLY A. HUCHKOx yCalifornia Department of Fish and Game (retired), Rancho Cordova, California, USA zMaxDepth Aquatics, Bend, Oregon, USA xOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Roseburg, Oregon, USA (Submitted 5 August 2013; Returned for Revision 15 September 2013; Accepted 7 April 2014) Abstract: In September 2006, Diamond Lake (OR, USA) was treated by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife with a mixture of powdered and liquid rotenone in the successful eradication of invasive tui chub Gila bicolor. During treatment, the lake was in the middle of a phytoplankton (including cyanobacteria Anabaena sp.) bloom, resulting in an elevated pH of 9.7. Dissipation of rotenone and its major metabolite rotenolone from water, sediment, and macrophytes was monitored. Rotenone dissipated quickly from Diamond Lake water; fi approximately 75% was gone within 2 d, and the average half-life (t1/2) value, estimated by using rst-order kinetics, was 4.5 d. Rotenolone > persisted longer ( 46 d) with a short-term t1/2 value of 16.2 d. Neither compound was found in groundwater, sediments, or macrophytes. The dissipation of rotenone and rotenolone appeared to occur in 2 stages, which was possibly the result of a release of both compounds from decaying phytoplankton following their initial dissipation. Fisheries managers applying rotenone for fish eradication in lentic environments should consider the following to maximize efficacy and regulatory compliance: 1) treat at a minimum of twice the minimum dose demonstrated for complete mortality of the target species and possibly higher depending on the site’s water pH and algae abundance, and 2) implement a program that closely monitors rotenone concentrations in the posttreatment management of a treated water body.
    [Show full text]
  • ON TAP “Drinking Water You Can Trust”
    ON TAP “Drinking Water You Can Trust” Vol. 24 Issue 1 March 1, 2010 2009 YEAR IN REVIEW 2009 was a year of slow growth for Umpqua Basin Water Association, Inc. Our membership grew with the addition of 4 new members. We had 19 new members join the Association but, we lost 15 members. Your Association grew to a total of 3,240 members. CURRENT AND PLANNED SYSTEM UPGRADES In 2009 your Association completed one of its largest projects to date. We replaced the water mainline that was hanging on Browns Bridge with a 950’, 22” HDPE (High Density Polyethylene) line, under the North Umpqua River. This new mainline has a life expectancy that will probably outlast the next two new bridges. ODOT and Douglas County are in the development stages of a new overpass that will be replacing the current Del Rio Rd over pass (exit 129). At this time UBWA is considering where our current line, which is attached to the current over pass, will be located. We are currently working with all the landowners, Douglas County, ODOT and others in this process. THE NORTH UMPQUA RIVER The North Umpqua River is a tributary of the Umpqua River, approximately 100 miles long, in southwestern Oregon in the United States. It drains a scenic and rugged area of the Cascade Range southwest of Eugene, flowing through steep canyons and surrounded by large Douglas fir forests. The North Umpqua River rises in the high Cascades, issuing from Maidu Lake at an elevation of 5,980 feet in the Mount Thielsen Wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Policy Framework for Natural Hazards Planning in Oregon?
    Hood River County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Hood River County and the Cities of Cascade Locks and Hood River Prepared for: Hood River County Emergency Management Department 601 State Street DRAFTHood River, OR 97031 Prepared by: University of Oregon’s Community Service Center: Resource Assistance for Rural Environments & Department of Land Conservation and Development 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403-1209 635 Capitol St. NE #150 Salem, OR 97301 June 2018 DRAFT Special Thanks & Acknowledgements Hood River County developed this Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan through a regional partnership funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Pre-Disaster Mitigation Competitive Grant Program. FEMA awarded the Mid-Columbia Gorge Region grant to support the update of natural hazards mitigation plans for eight counties in the region. The region’s planning process utilized a four-phased planning process, plan templates and plan development support provided by Resource Assistance for Rural Environments (RARE) and the University of Oregon’s Community Service Center. This project would not have been possible without technical and financial support provided by the Department of Land Conservation and Development. Regional partners include: Department of Land Conservation and Development Oregon Emergency Management FEMA Region X DRAFTUniversity of Oregon’s Community Service Center Resource Assistance for Rural Environments at the University of Oregon’s Community Service Center Project Steering Committee:
    [Show full text]
  • Blue-Sky Eruptions, Do They Exist? Implications for Monitoring New
    Blue‐sky eruptions, do they exist? Implications for monitoring New Zealand’s volcanoes. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Disaster and Hazard Management at the University of Canterbury by Angela Louise Doherty University of Canterbury 2009 Frontispiece “What are the odds, right?” “Before it happened it would have said slim, but since it did happen I would say 100%...” Dr Ray Langston replying to Catherine Willows (played by Lawrence Fishburne and Marg Helgenberger – CSI: Crime Scene Investigation). Lahar following the September 2007 eruption of Ruapehu (photo: GNS Science). Abstract The term “blue‐sky eruption” (BSE) can be used to describe eruptions which are unexpected or have no detected precursory activity. Case study analyses indicate that they have a diverse range of characteristics and magnitudes, providing both direct and indirect hazards and occur in both under‐developed and developed countries. BSEs can be a result of physical triggers (e.g. the lack of physically detectable precursors or a lack of understanding of the eruption model of the volcano), social triggers (such as an inadequate monitoring network), or a combination of the two. As the science of eruption forecasting is still relatively young, and the variations between individual volcanoes and individual eruptions are so great, there is no effective general model and none should be applied in the absence of a site‐specific model. Similarly, as methods vary between monitoring agencies, there are no monitoring benchmarks for effective BSE forecasting. However a combination of seismic and gas emission monitoring may be the most effective.
    [Show full text]
  • North Umpqua Wild and Scenic River Environmental Assessment
    NORW UMPQUA WII), AND SCENIC RIVER Environmental Assessment AWildUtJdMenicrivaenvirrmrnentcrlarceJstnantdevebpedjoinCIyby:. U. S. DEPT OF AGRlCUIXURE U.S. DEPT. ;Eu Ib$‘EIXIO; FOREST SERVICE Pa&k Northwest Region gg @ TqjT Umpqua National Forest OREGON STATE PARKS Q RECREATION DEPARTMENT JULY 1992 Environmental Assessment North Umpqua Wild and Scenic River Table ofContents CHAPTER I Purpoee and Need for Action.. ............................................................................... 1 Purpcee and Need/Proposed Action .............................................................................................I Background...................................................................................................................................... .1 Management Goal ...........................................................................................................................2 Scoping ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Outstandingly Remarkable Values ................................................................................................5 l.ssues................................................................................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER II Affected Envlronment .............................................................................................7 Setting..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thundering Waters
    CoolCool ClearClear WaterWater ThunderingThundering WWatersaters Umpqua National Forest Roseburg District Bureau of Land Management Welcome! Ron Murphy Lemolo Falls (low flow) TThishis bbrochurerochure iiss a ccooperativeooperative pprojectroject ddevelopedeveloped bbyy tthehe RRoseburgoseburg DDistrictistrict BBureauureau ooff LLandand MManagementanagement aandnd tthehe UUmpquampqua NNationalational FForest,orest, wwithith aassistancessistance ffromrom tthehe RRoseburgoseburg VVisitorsisitors aandnd CConventiononvention BBureau.ureau. Roseburg District, (541) 440-4930 Bureau of Land Management 777 NW Garden Valley Blvd. Roseburg, OR 97470 www.or.blm.gov/roseburg (brochure downloadable here) Umpqua National Forest (541) 672-6601 2900 NW Stewart Parkway Roseburg, OR 97470 North Umpqua Ranger District (541) 496-3532 Diamond Lake Ranger District (541) 498-2531 Cottage Grove Ranger District (541) 767-5000 Tiller Ranger District (541) 825-3100 www.fs.fed.us/r6/umpqua Roseburg Visitors (541) 672-9731 ToketeeToketee FallsFalls and Convention Bureau 410 SE Spruce Street U.S.U.S. DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT OFOF TTHEHE INTERIORINTERIOR Roseburg, OR 97470 BBUREAUUREAU OFOF LANDLAND MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT www.visitroseburg.com BLM/OR/WA/G1-99/027+4800 UMP-05-01 2/05 Cover Photo: Dave Lines North Umpqua River Waterfalls Umpqua National Forest 23 Roseburg BLM 26-3-1 Picnic/Day-use Area r Campground C 38 78 nt n Cr Rock Creek Ca o Lone Pine Cr Scaredman 11 Steamboat Falls Rock Creek Millpond 10 at 17 2610 Fish Hatchery Rock Canton Cr. Sambote Swiftwater R Island
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Lake TMDL Supplemental Information
    Appendix 4: Diamond Lake TMDL Supplemental Information This document is supplemental to the Umpqua Basin Diamond Lake TMDL (Chapter 6) The following report was prepared by J.C. Headwaters, Inc. J.C. Headwaters, Inc. TMDL Modeling and Analysis of Diamond Lake, Oregon Prepared for the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Eugene, OR By Joseph M. Eilers1 Benn J. Eilers1 and Jake Kann2 December 2003* *Modified December 2005 _____________________________________________ 1Current Affiliation: MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc. 1900 NE 3rd St., Suite 106-10, Bend, OR 97701 2Aquatic Ecosystem Sciences, 295 East Main St., Ashland, OR 97520 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………….. .2 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….….3 METHODS…………………………………………………………………….…7 1. Access Database………………………………………………………..7 2. Hydrologic Budget………………………………………………….….7 3. Hydrodynamic Model……………………………………………….…9 4. Assessment of Biological Communities……………………………....10 5. Paleolimnology………………………………………………………..12 6. Biological Model……………………………………………………...13 RESULTS………………………………………………………………………..18 1. Access Database……………………………………………………….18 2. Hydrologic Budget and Nutrient Fluxes………………………………18 3. Hydrodynamic Model (CE-QUAL-W2)………………………………27 4. Biological Assessment of Diamond Lake……………………………..28 INTERNAL LOADING AND THE NEED FOR A BIOLOGICAL MODEL….52 DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF THE FIN-S MODEL……………57 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD…….………………………….………….67 1. Fish-Based TMDL……………………………………………………67 2. Uncertainty Analysis…………………………………………………68 CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………………………………69 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………… ..71 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………. .75 APPENDICES……………………………………………………………… …75 ABSTRACT Diamond Lake, Oregon is a 1,226 ha lake in the central Cascades located at an elevation of 1580 m. The lake does not meet water quality standards for pH and algae. Since 2001 2 the lake has been experiencing large blooms of the cyanobacteria, Anabaena flos-aquae. In addition, the cyanobacteria have been producing a toxin, anatoxin-a, at levels considered potentially injurious to humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resource Potential Map of the Windigo
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geology and mineral resource potential map of the Windigo-Thielsen Roadless Area, Douglas and Klamath Counties, Oregon By David R. Sherrod, 1 o John R. Benham, and Norman S. MacLeod* Open-File Report 83-660 1-U.S. Geological Survey ^U.S. Bureau of Mines 1983 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Windigo-Thielsen Roadless Area (6132) in the Deschutes, Umpqua, and Winema National Forests, Douglas and Klamath Counties, Oregon. The Windigo-Thielsen Roadless Area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) by the U.S. Forest Service, January, 1979; part of the area was administratively endorsed as wilderness in April 1979. SUMMARY The Windigo-Thielsen Roadless Area has no identified metallic mineral resources and there is no evidence of a potential for their occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Lemolo Lake Resort Douglas County
    ™ ® proudly presents Lemolo Lake Resort douglas county . oregon FARM, RANCH, AND RECREATIONAL REAL ESTATE • Stunning Setting - 500 Acre Lake 140’ Deep with both water skiing and jet skiing. Set just to the North of Crater Lake National Park This is a Tremendous Opportunity, the Lemolo Lake • Huge One of a Kind Development Opportunity In an Area of Resort is primed and ready for enormous advances! Virtually No Competition • The Resort is NOT on the Historic Registry - Which means Owners will consider terms with a qualifying credit modifications the existing infostructor are allowed and easy to do and strong down payment. • +/-80 Developable Acres (Has already passed NEPA Study, Scoping and Public Comment) Permit will allow for New Lodge, Homesite, and additional 200+ cabins Lemolo Lake Resort, located just 15 miles from the • Approved “Master Development Plan” signed 01-01-2007 and 20 North Entrance of Crater Lake National Park, and Year Change to “Master Development Plan” situated at 4300 feet in the beautiful Oregon Cascade • 15 Miles N.E. of Crater Lake National Park Range, offers a myriad of activities for the outdoor • On the North Umpqua Trail enthusiast. • World Class German Brown Fishing (We could have the new State Record?) In the summer, guests enjoy boating and jet skis; in • Excellent Kokanee Production 16-18” • Hiking, Cross Country Skiing, Snow Machine Trails, Hunting, Jet the winter, cozy cabins warm guests from all over the Skiing, Boating, Water Skiing and Fishing world. From right outside their cabin door, there are • Elk, Deer, Bear, Cougar, Birds... miles to discover snowshoeing and 350 plus miles of • 12 Miles from Diamond Lake Resort groomed snowmobile trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada and Western U.S.A
    Appendix B – Region 12 Country and regional profiles of volcanic hazard and risk: Canada and Western U.S.A. S.K. Brown1, R.S.J. Sparks1, K. Mee2, C. Vye-Brown2, E.Ilyinskaya2, S.F. Jenkins1, S.C. Loughlin2* 1University of Bristol, UK; 2British Geological Survey, UK, * Full contributor list available in Appendix B Full Download This download comprises the profiles for Region 12: Canada and Western U.S.A. only. For the full report and all regions see Appendix B Full Download. Page numbers reflect position in the full report. The following countries are profiled here: Region 12 Canada and Western USA Pg.491 Canada 499 USA – Contiguous States 507 Brown, S.K., Sparks, R.S.J., Mee, K., Vye-Brown, C., Ilyinskaya, E., Jenkins, S.F., and Loughlin, S.C. (2015) Country and regional profiles of volcanic hazard and risk. In: S.C. Loughlin, R.S.J. Sparks, S.K. Brown, S.F. Jenkins & C. Vye-Brown (eds) Global Volcanic Hazards and Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. This profile and the data therein should not be used in place of focussed assessments and information provided by local monitoring and research institutions. Region 12: Canada and Western USA Description Region 12: Canada and Western USA comprises volcanoes throughout Canada and the contiguous states of the USA. Country Number of volcanoes Canada 22 USA 48 Table 12.1 The countries represented in this region and the number of volcanoes. Volcanoes located on the borders between countries are included in the profiles of all countries involved. Note that countries may be represented in more than one region, as overseas territories may be widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2020 to 03/31/2020 Umpqua National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2020 to 03/31/2020 Umpqua National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Regionwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Region) Regional Aquatic Restoration - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Completed Actual: 12/18/2019 01/2020 James Capurso Project - Watershed management 503-808-2847 EA [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The USFS is proposing a suite of aquatic restoration activities for Region 6 to address ongoing needs, all of which have completed consultation, including activities such as fish passage restoration, wood placement, and other restoration activities. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=53001 Location: UNIT - R6 - Pacific Northwest Region All Units. STATE - Oregon, Washington. COUNTY - Adams, Asotin, Benton, Chelan, Clallam, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Douglas, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lewis, Lincoln, Mason, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Spokane, Stevens, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Whitman, Yakima, Baker, Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lake, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Malheur, Marion,
    [Show full text]
  • Campground Mazama Campground, Crater Lake National Park Pond, Annie Falls, Godfrey's Glen Annie Canyon Located on Crater Lake Highway, Jackson F
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Oregon Byway Highway # "Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway" Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Start of RogueUmpqua Junction of State Highway #138 with Interstate Highway #5 in Scenic Byway Roseburg, Oregon, This is where the Rogue Umpqua Scenic Byway starts. Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway offers towering coniferous forests, 172 miles of diverse river and mountain landscapes, roaring white water rapids, rolling oak-covered hills, and incised intercanyon lava flows. Drive beside the Upper Rogue and North Umpqua Wild and Scenic Rivers that have world-class fisheries. 3.3 Sunshine Road Sunshine Road, North Little River, in Roseburg, Oregon 3.7 Buckhorn Road Buckhorn Road / Dixonville Road, Glide Aero Airport, a private airport located in Douglas County, Oregon. 5.7 Dixonville, Oregon Dixonville, Oregon, a community located on Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway in Douglas County, Oregon 10.6 Singleton Road Singleton Road, 11.7 Whistler Road Whistelers Park Road to Whistler's Bend on the Umpqua River. Glide Transfer Road, 14.9 North Bank Road North Bank Road / Wild River Drive, Umpqua Airport, a private airport, located in Douglas County, Oregon, on the banks of Umpqua River, Oregon 16.3 Glide, Oregon Glide, Oregon, a census designated place in Douglas County, Oregon. Colliding Rivers 20.6 Idleyld Park, Oregon Idleyld Park, Oregon. 21.9 Rock Creek Road Rock Creek Road / Burea of Land Management Road 25.7 Honey Creek Road Honey Creek Road / BLM Road 26-2-70, 28.3 Susan Creek Road Susan Creek Road / BLM 23-0 Road, Susan Creek Falls, 33.1
    [Show full text]