Lemolo and Diamond Lakes Watershed Analysis 2 Table of Contents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fate and Behavior of Rotenone in Diamond Lake, Oregon, Usa Following Invasive Tui Chub Eradication
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 1650–1655, 2014 # 2014 SETAC Printed in the USA FATE AND BEHAVIOR OF ROTENONE IN DIAMOND LAKE, OREGON, USA FOLLOWING INVASIVE TUI CHUB ERADICATION BRIAN J. FINLAYSON,*y JOSEPH M. EILERS,z and HOLLY A. HUCHKOx yCalifornia Department of Fish and Game (retired), Rancho Cordova, California, USA zMaxDepth Aquatics, Bend, Oregon, USA xOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Roseburg, Oregon, USA (Submitted 5 August 2013; Returned for Revision 15 September 2013; Accepted 7 April 2014) Abstract: In September 2006, Diamond Lake (OR, USA) was treated by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife with a mixture of powdered and liquid rotenone in the successful eradication of invasive tui chub Gila bicolor. During treatment, the lake was in the middle of a phytoplankton (including cyanobacteria Anabaena sp.) bloom, resulting in an elevated pH of 9.7. Dissipation of rotenone and its major metabolite rotenolone from water, sediment, and macrophytes was monitored. Rotenone dissipated quickly from Diamond Lake water; fi approximately 75% was gone within 2 d, and the average half-life (t1/2) value, estimated by using rst-order kinetics, was 4.5 d. Rotenolone > persisted longer ( 46 d) with a short-term t1/2 value of 16.2 d. Neither compound was found in groundwater, sediments, or macrophytes. The dissipation of rotenone and rotenolone appeared to occur in 2 stages, which was possibly the result of a release of both compounds from decaying phytoplankton following their initial dissipation. Fisheries managers applying rotenone for fish eradication in lentic environments should consider the following to maximize efficacy and regulatory compliance: 1) treat at a minimum of twice the minimum dose demonstrated for complete mortality of the target species and possibly higher depending on the site’s water pH and algae abundance, and 2) implement a program that closely monitors rotenone concentrations in the posttreatment management of a treated water body. -
ON TAP “Drinking Water You Can Trust”
ON TAP “Drinking Water You Can Trust” Vol. 24 Issue 1 March 1, 2010 2009 YEAR IN REVIEW 2009 was a year of slow growth for Umpqua Basin Water Association, Inc. Our membership grew with the addition of 4 new members. We had 19 new members join the Association but, we lost 15 members. Your Association grew to a total of 3,240 members. CURRENT AND PLANNED SYSTEM UPGRADES In 2009 your Association completed one of its largest projects to date. We replaced the water mainline that was hanging on Browns Bridge with a 950’, 22” HDPE (High Density Polyethylene) line, under the North Umpqua River. This new mainline has a life expectancy that will probably outlast the next two new bridges. ODOT and Douglas County are in the development stages of a new overpass that will be replacing the current Del Rio Rd over pass (exit 129). At this time UBWA is considering where our current line, which is attached to the current over pass, will be located. We are currently working with all the landowners, Douglas County, ODOT and others in this process. THE NORTH UMPQUA RIVER The North Umpqua River is a tributary of the Umpqua River, approximately 100 miles long, in southwestern Oregon in the United States. It drains a scenic and rugged area of the Cascade Range southwest of Eugene, flowing through steep canyons and surrounded by large Douglas fir forests. The North Umpqua River rises in the high Cascades, issuing from Maidu Lake at an elevation of 5,980 feet in the Mount Thielsen Wilderness. -
What Is the Policy Framework for Natural Hazards Planning in Oregon?
Hood River County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Hood River County and the Cities of Cascade Locks and Hood River Prepared for: Hood River County Emergency Management Department 601 State Street DRAFTHood River, OR 97031 Prepared by: University of Oregon’s Community Service Center: Resource Assistance for Rural Environments & Department of Land Conservation and Development 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403-1209 635 Capitol St. NE #150 Salem, OR 97301 June 2018 DRAFT Special Thanks & Acknowledgements Hood River County developed this Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan through a regional partnership funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Pre-Disaster Mitigation Competitive Grant Program. FEMA awarded the Mid-Columbia Gorge Region grant to support the update of natural hazards mitigation plans for eight counties in the region. The region’s planning process utilized a four-phased planning process, plan templates and plan development support provided by Resource Assistance for Rural Environments (RARE) and the University of Oregon’s Community Service Center. This project would not have been possible without technical and financial support provided by the Department of Land Conservation and Development. Regional partners include: Department of Land Conservation and Development Oregon Emergency Management FEMA Region X DRAFTUniversity of Oregon’s Community Service Center Resource Assistance for Rural Environments at the University of Oregon’s Community Service Center Project Steering Committee: -
Blue-Sky Eruptions, Do They Exist? Implications for Monitoring New
Blue‐sky eruptions, do they exist? Implications for monitoring New Zealand’s volcanoes. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Disaster and Hazard Management at the University of Canterbury by Angela Louise Doherty University of Canterbury 2009 Frontispiece “What are the odds, right?” “Before it happened it would have said slim, but since it did happen I would say 100%...” Dr Ray Langston replying to Catherine Willows (played by Lawrence Fishburne and Marg Helgenberger – CSI: Crime Scene Investigation). Lahar following the September 2007 eruption of Ruapehu (photo: GNS Science). Abstract The term “blue‐sky eruption” (BSE) can be used to describe eruptions which are unexpected or have no detected precursory activity. Case study analyses indicate that they have a diverse range of characteristics and magnitudes, providing both direct and indirect hazards and occur in both under‐developed and developed countries. BSEs can be a result of physical triggers (e.g. the lack of physically detectable precursors or a lack of understanding of the eruption model of the volcano), social triggers (such as an inadequate monitoring network), or a combination of the two. As the science of eruption forecasting is still relatively young, and the variations between individual volcanoes and individual eruptions are so great, there is no effective general model and none should be applied in the absence of a site‐specific model. Similarly, as methods vary between monitoring agencies, there are no monitoring benchmarks for effective BSE forecasting. However a combination of seismic and gas emission monitoring may be the most effective. -
North Umpqua Wild and Scenic River Environmental Assessment
NORW UMPQUA WII), AND SCENIC RIVER Environmental Assessment AWildUtJdMenicrivaenvirrmrnentcrlarceJstnantdevebpedjoinCIyby:. U. S. DEPT OF AGRlCUIXURE U.S. DEPT. ;Eu Ib$‘EIXIO; FOREST SERVICE Pa&k Northwest Region gg @ TqjT Umpqua National Forest OREGON STATE PARKS Q RECREATION DEPARTMENT JULY 1992 Environmental Assessment North Umpqua Wild and Scenic River Table ofContents CHAPTER I Purpoee and Need for Action.. ............................................................................... 1 Purpcee and Need/Proposed Action .............................................................................................I Background...................................................................................................................................... .1 Management Goal ...........................................................................................................................2 Scoping ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Outstandingly Remarkable Values ................................................................................................5 l.ssues................................................................................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER II Affected Envlronment .............................................................................................7 Setting.............................................................................................................................................. -
Thundering Waters
CoolCool ClearClear WaterWater ThunderingThundering WWatersaters Umpqua National Forest Roseburg District Bureau of Land Management Welcome! Ron Murphy Lemolo Falls (low flow) TThishis bbrochurerochure iiss a ccooperativeooperative pprojectroject ddevelopedeveloped bbyy tthehe RRoseburgoseburg DDistrictistrict BBureauureau ooff LLandand MManagementanagement aandnd tthehe UUmpquampqua NNationalational FForest,orest, wwithith aassistancessistance ffromrom tthehe RRoseburgoseburg VVisitorsisitors aandnd CConventiononvention BBureau.ureau. Roseburg District, (541) 440-4930 Bureau of Land Management 777 NW Garden Valley Blvd. Roseburg, OR 97470 www.or.blm.gov/roseburg (brochure downloadable here) Umpqua National Forest (541) 672-6601 2900 NW Stewart Parkway Roseburg, OR 97470 North Umpqua Ranger District (541) 496-3532 Diamond Lake Ranger District (541) 498-2531 Cottage Grove Ranger District (541) 767-5000 Tiller Ranger District (541) 825-3100 www.fs.fed.us/r6/umpqua Roseburg Visitors (541) 672-9731 ToketeeToketee FallsFalls and Convention Bureau 410 SE Spruce Street U.S.U.S. DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT OFOF TTHEHE INTERIORINTERIOR Roseburg, OR 97470 BBUREAUUREAU OFOF LANDLAND MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT www.visitroseburg.com BLM/OR/WA/G1-99/027+4800 UMP-05-01 2/05 Cover Photo: Dave Lines North Umpqua River Waterfalls Umpqua National Forest 23 Roseburg BLM 26-3-1 Picnic/Day-use Area r Campground C 38 78 nt n Cr Rock Creek Ca o Lone Pine Cr Scaredman 11 Steamboat Falls Rock Creek Millpond 10 at 17 2610 Fish Hatchery Rock Canton Cr. Sambote Swiftwater R Island -
Diamond Lake TMDL Supplemental Information
Appendix 4: Diamond Lake TMDL Supplemental Information This document is supplemental to the Umpqua Basin Diamond Lake TMDL (Chapter 6) The following report was prepared by J.C. Headwaters, Inc. J.C. Headwaters, Inc. TMDL Modeling and Analysis of Diamond Lake, Oregon Prepared for the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Eugene, OR By Joseph M. Eilers1 Benn J. Eilers1 and Jake Kann2 December 2003* *Modified December 2005 _____________________________________________ 1Current Affiliation: MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc. 1900 NE 3rd St., Suite 106-10, Bend, OR 97701 2Aquatic Ecosystem Sciences, 295 East Main St., Ashland, OR 97520 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………….. .2 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….….3 METHODS…………………………………………………………………….…7 1. Access Database………………………………………………………..7 2. Hydrologic Budget………………………………………………….….7 3. Hydrodynamic Model……………………………………………….…9 4. Assessment of Biological Communities……………………………....10 5. Paleolimnology………………………………………………………..12 6. Biological Model……………………………………………………...13 RESULTS………………………………………………………………………..18 1. Access Database……………………………………………………….18 2. Hydrologic Budget and Nutrient Fluxes………………………………18 3. Hydrodynamic Model (CE-QUAL-W2)………………………………27 4. Biological Assessment of Diamond Lake……………………………..28 INTERNAL LOADING AND THE NEED FOR A BIOLOGICAL MODEL….52 DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF THE FIN-S MODEL……………57 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD…….………………………….………….67 1. Fish-Based TMDL……………………………………………………67 2. Uncertainty Analysis…………………………………………………68 CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………………………………69 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………… ..71 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………. .75 APPENDICES……………………………………………………………… …75 ABSTRACT Diamond Lake, Oregon is a 1,226 ha lake in the central Cascades located at an elevation of 1580 m. The lake does not meet water quality standards for pH and algae. Since 2001 2 the lake has been experiencing large blooms of the cyanobacteria, Anabaena flos-aquae. In addition, the cyanobacteria have been producing a toxin, anatoxin-a, at levels considered potentially injurious to humans. -
Geology and Mineral Resource Potential Map of the Windigo
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geology and mineral resource potential map of the Windigo-Thielsen Roadless Area, Douglas and Klamath Counties, Oregon By David R. Sherrod, 1 o John R. Benham, and Norman S. MacLeod* Open-File Report 83-660 1-U.S. Geological Survey ^U.S. Bureau of Mines 1983 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Windigo-Thielsen Roadless Area (6132) in the Deschutes, Umpqua, and Winema National Forests, Douglas and Klamath Counties, Oregon. The Windigo-Thielsen Roadless Area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) by the U.S. Forest Service, January, 1979; part of the area was administratively endorsed as wilderness in April 1979. SUMMARY The Windigo-Thielsen Roadless Area has no identified metallic mineral resources and there is no evidence of a potential for their occurrence. -
Lemolo Lake Resort Douglas County
™ ® proudly presents Lemolo Lake Resort douglas county . oregon FARM, RANCH, AND RECREATIONAL REAL ESTATE • Stunning Setting - 500 Acre Lake 140’ Deep with both water skiing and jet skiing. Set just to the North of Crater Lake National Park This is a Tremendous Opportunity, the Lemolo Lake • Huge One of a Kind Development Opportunity In an Area of Resort is primed and ready for enormous advances! Virtually No Competition • The Resort is NOT on the Historic Registry - Which means Owners will consider terms with a qualifying credit modifications the existing infostructor are allowed and easy to do and strong down payment. • +/-80 Developable Acres (Has already passed NEPA Study, Scoping and Public Comment) Permit will allow for New Lodge, Homesite, and additional 200+ cabins Lemolo Lake Resort, located just 15 miles from the • Approved “Master Development Plan” signed 01-01-2007 and 20 North Entrance of Crater Lake National Park, and Year Change to “Master Development Plan” situated at 4300 feet in the beautiful Oregon Cascade • 15 Miles N.E. of Crater Lake National Park Range, offers a myriad of activities for the outdoor • On the North Umpqua Trail enthusiast. • World Class German Brown Fishing (We could have the new State Record?) In the summer, guests enjoy boating and jet skis; in • Excellent Kokanee Production 16-18” • Hiking, Cross Country Skiing, Snow Machine Trails, Hunting, Jet the winter, cozy cabins warm guests from all over the Skiing, Boating, Water Skiing and Fishing world. From right outside their cabin door, there are • Elk, Deer, Bear, Cougar, Birds... miles to discover snowshoeing and 350 plus miles of • 12 Miles from Diamond Lake Resort groomed snowmobile trails. -
Canada and Western U.S.A
Appendix B – Region 12 Country and regional profiles of volcanic hazard and risk: Canada and Western U.S.A. S.K. Brown1, R.S.J. Sparks1, K. Mee2, C. Vye-Brown2, E.Ilyinskaya2, S.F. Jenkins1, S.C. Loughlin2* 1University of Bristol, UK; 2British Geological Survey, UK, * Full contributor list available in Appendix B Full Download This download comprises the profiles for Region 12: Canada and Western U.S.A. only. For the full report and all regions see Appendix B Full Download. Page numbers reflect position in the full report. The following countries are profiled here: Region 12 Canada and Western USA Pg.491 Canada 499 USA – Contiguous States 507 Brown, S.K., Sparks, R.S.J., Mee, K., Vye-Brown, C., Ilyinskaya, E., Jenkins, S.F., and Loughlin, S.C. (2015) Country and regional profiles of volcanic hazard and risk. In: S.C. Loughlin, R.S.J. Sparks, S.K. Brown, S.F. Jenkins & C. Vye-Brown (eds) Global Volcanic Hazards and Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. This profile and the data therein should not be used in place of focussed assessments and information provided by local monitoring and research institutions. Region 12: Canada and Western USA Description Region 12: Canada and Western USA comprises volcanoes throughout Canada and the contiguous states of the USA. Country Number of volcanoes Canada 22 USA 48 Table 12.1 The countries represented in this region and the number of volcanoes. Volcanoes located on the borders between countries are included in the profiles of all countries involved. Note that countries may be represented in more than one region, as overseas territories may be widespread. -
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2020 to 03/31/2020 Umpqua National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2020 to 03/31/2020 Umpqua National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Regionwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Region) Regional Aquatic Restoration - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Completed Actual: 12/18/2019 01/2020 James Capurso Project - Watershed management 503-808-2847 EA [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The USFS is proposing a suite of aquatic restoration activities for Region 6 to address ongoing needs, all of which have completed consultation, including activities such as fish passage restoration, wood placement, and other restoration activities. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=53001 Location: UNIT - R6 - Pacific Northwest Region All Units. STATE - Oregon, Washington. COUNTY - Adams, Asotin, Benton, Chelan, Clallam, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Douglas, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lewis, Lincoln, Mason, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Spokane, Stevens, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Whitman, Yakima, Baker, Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lake, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Malheur, Marion, -
Campground Mazama Campground, Crater Lake National Park Pond, Annie Falls, Godfrey's Glen Annie Canyon Located on Crater Lake Highway, Jackson F
MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Oregon Byway Highway # "Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway" Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Start of RogueUmpqua Junction of State Highway #138 with Interstate Highway #5 in Scenic Byway Roseburg, Oregon, This is where the Rogue Umpqua Scenic Byway starts. Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway offers towering coniferous forests, 172 miles of diverse river and mountain landscapes, roaring white water rapids, rolling oak-covered hills, and incised intercanyon lava flows. Drive beside the Upper Rogue and North Umpqua Wild and Scenic Rivers that have world-class fisheries. 3.3 Sunshine Road Sunshine Road, North Little River, in Roseburg, Oregon 3.7 Buckhorn Road Buckhorn Road / Dixonville Road, Glide Aero Airport, a private airport located in Douglas County, Oregon. 5.7 Dixonville, Oregon Dixonville, Oregon, a community located on Rogue-Umpqua Scenic Byway in Douglas County, Oregon 10.6 Singleton Road Singleton Road, 11.7 Whistler Road Whistelers Park Road to Whistler's Bend on the Umpqua River. Glide Transfer Road, 14.9 North Bank Road North Bank Road / Wild River Drive, Umpqua Airport, a private airport, located in Douglas County, Oregon, on the banks of Umpqua River, Oregon 16.3 Glide, Oregon Glide, Oregon, a census designated place in Douglas County, Oregon. Colliding Rivers 20.6 Idleyld Park, Oregon Idleyld Park, Oregon. 21.9 Rock Creek Road Rock Creek Road / Burea of Land Management Road 25.7 Honey Creek Road Honey Creek Road / BLM Road 26-2-70, 28.3 Susan Creek Road Susan Creek Road / BLM 23-0 Road, Susan Creek Falls, 33.1