Written Evidence Submitted by Sir Robert Mcalpine Ltd [BSB 377]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Written Evidence Submitted by Sir Robert Mcalpine Ltd [BSB 377] Written evidence submitted by Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd [BSB 377] 1. Introduction 1.1 Sir Robert McAlpine (SRM) welcomes the Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee undertaking pre-legislative scrutiny on the Draft Building Safety Bill and is grateful for this opportunity to respond to your call for evidence. 1.2 SRM are passionate about building safety and quality control through all stages of the design and construction of our projects, which is why we welcome the Government’s commitment to improve standards and create more accountability on every project. There should be an emphasis on ensuring the right frameworks and procedures are in place to judge building competence and safety fairly and ensure offenders receive robust penalties. 1.3 We welcome the Bill’s recognition of the issues and support the sentiments outlined in the draft legislation. Our response to the Committee’s questions largely focus on areas in which we would be grateful for further detail and clarification to ensure that the construction industry can adequately implement and deliver the new measures. 2. About Sir Robert McAlpine 2.1 Sir Robert McAlpine is a family-owned building and civil engineering company operating from 12 offices across the UK. Established in 1869, we have been a ubiquitous construction leader over two centuries. We are honoured to have worked on some of Britain’s most iconic buildings and projects, such as the Olympic Stadium, O2 Arena, Emirates Stadium, the Eden Project, Victoria Gate Shopping Centre in Leeds, the M74 Completion in Glasgow, and Victoria Square in Woking. 2.2 The values at the heart of our operations include a commitment to the highest standards of safety, quality, engineering excellence, sustainability, and an unswerving focus on the needs and aspirations of our clients, with an overall aim to make a positive impact on the communities and the environment in which we operate. 3. Does the draft Bill establish an appropriate scope of the new regulation system? 3.1 We believe the draft Bill will create sufficient scope in order to allow for a robust new regulatory system, however, we also believe that there are certain aspects of the proposed legislation which require further clarification to aid the construction industry. 3.2 The definition of a ‘high risk building’ is a building over 6 storeys or 18 metres. At SRM, we would appreciate understanding whether there is scope within the Bill to expand the current definition of “high risk building” to include new and updated definitions over time. For example, Building Regulation 7 (2) which models high risk buildings is currently being consulted on and could extend the definition of high- risk buildings. We would like to see scope within the Bill for the current definition of ‘high risk building’ to be expanded to take account for updated definitions. 3.3 Furthermore, we would like to see the definition of ‘high risk building’ to be able to be expanded to include the undertaking of particular building practices, such as the use of Modern Methods of Construction and modular buildings, or buildings with timber frameworks. 3.4 We would also like to see clarification in the Bill included on whether the occupants of the building will be considered when assessing if it is ‘high risk’. For example, would a low-rise school, care home or hospital be considered “high risk” buildings, given the vulnerable nature of their tenants. 3.5 We think it is worth the Committee considering whether this Bill should apply to all building to form a consistent approach across the industry that ensures buildings are safe and constructed to the correct specification to ensure fire compliance. 4. Will the Bill provide for a robust – and realistic – system of accountability for those responsible for the building safety? 4.1 Whilst the Bill proposes a solid system of accountability and will help to ensure rigorous building safety as well as a high level of standards, we believe that questions remain around the definition of ‘competence’ and how this will be assessed in the system. For instance, will it comprise of a mix between professional building qualifications and experience, or will an individual reach a level of ‘competence’ if they pass certain evaluations. To ensure a rigorous process and that individuals are kept up to date with industry developments, we believe that they should be required to demonstrate their competence, for example through testing every few years. 4.2 In order to make the system of accountability as outlined in the Bill as robust as possible, there needs to be a greater definition as to how site competence is assessed and evaluated. We do not believe it should be left up to individual companies to interpret and define. We would like to see the Building Safety Regulator set out a clear definition and competence levels, to ensure consistency across the sector. Doing so will enhance the strength of the system to determine where responsibility for building failures lie. 5. Are the sanctions on those who do not meet their responsibilities strong enough? 5.1 SRM is content that the sanctions for those who do not meet their responsibilities outlined in the draft legislation are sufficient to ensure robust levels of building safety. 5.2 We would like to see greater clarification in the Bill on a procedure for whistleblowing and how concerns will be investigated. To protect whistle-blowers, it is important that the Bill provides them with appropriate avenues to raise their concerns. We would like to see the Building Safety Regulator given powers to investigate whistleblowing complaints and conduct a fair process for both sides. Enshrining powers, procedures and process for whistleblowing investigation in legislation would be a valuable step towards improving the building safety. 6. Does the Bill improve the product testing regime in a way that will command the full confidence of the sector? 6.1 SRM agrees that the Bill will improve the product testing regime, however there are steps that we believe could be taken by the Building Safety Regulator which will further support the system and provide the sector with greater confidence. Whilst product testing will be improved- what is lacking is a proper full system test for a building façade. 6.2 Designated standards will help us by making the process easier to understand if a product has been tested. We would like to see a system of a central catalogue of “approved” materials, hosted such that staff can simply log-in to check whether it is approved when a new product is brought to the table by a manufacturer. We have concerns however that manufacturers will use this opportunity to increase prices, as we saw when timber standards were introduced which led to a price rise of 10%. 6.3 We would like to see the Building Safety Regulator provide guidance to the sector on mixing components to ensure that the system is safe and robust. When shortages occur on certain products, there is sometimes the need for construction companies to mix components to deliver a project. In these instances, we need to know what products we can and cannot substitute and believe the Building Safety Regulator could play a role in supporting this. We understand that all products need to be non-combustible. 6.4 As an example, one of the intumescent mastics used for sprinkler pipes to provide fire protection for buildings has strong fire protection qualities, however overtime the mastic degrades the sprinkler pipe and can cause it to split. Whilst this may appeal fire safe initially, it has a detrimental impact over time. Standardisation and guidance with manufacturers working together to provide information to contractors on mixing components, with a streamlined process, would provide the sector with greater confidence on what products can be used together. 6.5 We would like the Building Safety Regulator to guide manufacturers on how they can work together on improving the compatibility of products. We would like to see that labelling on the compatible products are in place and are very clear, and easy to understand. 7 Is it right that the new Building Safety Regulator be established under the Health & Safety Executive, and how should it be funded? 7.1 Sir Robert McAlpine believe that in order to ensure the highest levels of building safety, it is correct that the new Building Safety Regulator should be established under the current Health and Safety Executive. Doing so allows for knowledge and experience sharing between the two organisations, whilst the credibility of the new institution will be further enhanced by the backing of the HSE. 7.2 We believe that it is most appropriate for the Building Safety Regulator to be funded by the project developer. Doing so will ensure that developers take an equal share of responsibility for ensuring building safety, and do not place undue pressure on the Principal Contractors. By making clients and developers provide a financial contribution to the establishment of the new regulatory function, they will automatically become stakeholders with a vested interest in its success and credibility. In turn, this will crucially ensure that clients and developers do not pressure contractors to sacrifice safety measures in order to deliver projects ahead of time or under budget. 7.3 As the Principal Contractors will be responsible for risk control during the construction of the building it is important to make both the client and developer share responsibility for safety onsite, guaranteeing a more robust regulator. September 2020.
Recommended publications
  • SCOTT WILSON KIRKPATRICK and PARTNERS No. 29 Summer 1972
    The House Magazine of SCOTT WILSON KIRKPATRICK AND PARTNERS No. 29 Summer 1972 PRINTED IN ENGLAND by WIGOTMAN MOUNTAIN LTD. WESIMINSIER LONDON, S.W.l CONTENTS PARTNERS’ PANORAMA . 3 OBITUARY . 5 M6 MOTORWAY WINS Civic TRUST AWARD . 6 BRIDGE OVER THE RIVER KWAI by Steve Hobden . 8 VINTAGE MECHANIC by Morris Hopkins . 10 THE WORLD OF BERT BADGER by Arturo Rotunda . 12 GRUBE-SCOTT—THE NEW EUROPEANS 15 IF IT MOVES b John Franklin . 17 NEW JOB NUMBERS . 21 NEWSLETTERS: Brunei . 23 Glasgow . 25 Kendal . 26 London . 26 Malawi . 27 Maleria . 28 Nigeria . 29 Northern Ireland . 32 Starnberg . 32 . STAFF NOTES . 34 WEDDINGS . 36 CLUB NOTES: Cricket . 38 Camera . 39 . Darts . 39 Golf . 40 Squash . 40 Tennis . 41 Badminton . 42 Soccer . 42 INIA’S P0UIHI . 44 UKAPE GETS 262 . 48 KWAI CHUNG GROUND-BREAKING CEREMONY . 49 THE ALTERNATIVE VIEW by Richer Navel . 50 APOLOGIES AND CORRECTIONS . 51 EDITORIAL . 51 Cover Photograph The Pouihi at New Zealand House during erection. (Picture taken before the prows were attached; see Wally Grainger’s article). PONTIFACT No. 29 SUMMER, 1972 3 Partners’ Panorama the last issue of Pontifact Mr. Hawkey, he should take over the bridging practice from in his Partners’ Panorama, announced W. L. Scott and the bridging which formed an that he and Oliver Measor would be appreciable part of both our rural and urban retiring during 1972. As you all know both motorway work retired on April 5th. Only a few members of the Mr. Measor has always been interested in new staff will be able to look back to the early days techniques and the original B.E.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Charter
    Partnership Charter “achieving excellence in learning through partnership working” Set up onsite Work Kickstart training placements scheme facility Traineeships Upskill your £1,000 ESOL workforce incentive for businesses Employer led Recruitment Remote qualifications support classrooms & COVID-19 support Partnership Charter Partnership Charter “achieving excellence in learning through partnership working” Our mission is to achieve excellence for our learners through the formation of proactive business and stakeholder partnerships formed across a range of industry sectors. Our commitment is to ensure that businesses and partners are able to have a voice to inform the shape of our service delivery. The economic landscape is a challenging one, but with a partnership commitment we can align common objectives to ensure that we tackle barriers associated to skills and employment collectively to support young people and adult learner communities to get on in life and work. We also welcome discussions with other educational providers, where there are opportunities to align our curriculum offers that creates a skills progression map for learners to attain higher level qualifications in wider technical industry disciplines. We have therefore launched this partnership charter that clearly articulates our mission and core services to achieve excellent outcomes for our learners by ensuring they are equipped with the necessary skills elements that are aligned to the ever-evolving business needs. We look forward to working in partnership to achieve our joint objectives. Partnership Charter High-profile employer partnerships Since 2006, Learning & Skills Solutions has created strong partnerships with a range of employers both large and SMEs across a number of sector skill areas, for example Construction, Security, Health & fitness and Hospitality.
    [Show full text]
  • 40656 VINCI Communiqué 50.Indd 1 27/05/2015 11:44 1 NEWS ROUND-UP
    THE QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER OF VINCI CONSTRUCTION UK ISSUE 50 / SUMMER 2015 01 NUCLEAR Making an Impact VINCI Technology Centre UK has a long 02 history of performing drop tests and has been involved in the nuclear industry since the 1950’s. The company was recently commissioned by a client in the 03 nuclear industry to carry out a drop test of an 18 tonne flask used for the storage and transportation of intermediate level nuclear waste. Measurements were 04 recorded during the drop to verify pre-test analysis of the flasks prior to use. RETAIL Dixons Carphone FM Contract Renewed VINCI Facilities has successfully negotiated a third contract renewal with Dixons and has been awarded the facilities management of a further 900 Carphone stores following the recent Dixons and Carphone Warehouse merger. The renewal extends to more than 1400 outlets across the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Colourful Coatings in Carlisle Conren has been called upon to complete a renovation project for David Hayton Ltd in Carlisle, the leading Peugeot Dealer for the North West. Five years ago, an area of approximately 845m2 was prepared and coated with Conren Dustguard heavy duty epoxy resin. After five years of heavy commercial use, the floor was ready for a refresh. David Haytons were so impressed with the performance of the Dustguard coating they once again opted for this durable system. A MONUMENTAL LEGACY PROJECT Completing this summer, With one academic building already minimum of 600mm to take them above handed over to the University, the the one-in-200-year flood levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Masters 2010: Thomas T Barton
    Past Masters 2010: Thomas T Barton Tom joined the Paviors in 1990. He was Chairman of the Admissions Committee for a number of years. He also organised the Swimathon for a several of years. Tom spent most of his childhood in Eastern Nigeria and the Cameroons. He has memories of no electricity, ferries not bridges and laterite roads, which felt like driving over corrugated iron. It was this early insight into what Civil Engineering could achieve that made him decide to go into the Civil Engineering profession. Tom went to school at Downside in Somerset and then New College, Oxford where he gained an honours degree in Engineering with Economics. He joined Mowlem to work on the National Westminster Tower on the day of the first concrete pour for the raft of the Tower. He went on to design the slipforming methods for the core and then supervised the construction of the tower superstructure. During this time he became a Chartered Engineer. He subsequently wrote a paper for the Institution of Civil Engineers on the slipforming of the Tower for which he was awarded the Telford Medal. Some of the other projects that he worked on whilst at Mowlem’s included a number of high security prisons, several hospitals, numerous office projects in the City and the John Lewis Department Store in Kingston, where the Client was Past Master John Carpenter – They are still talking!! Tom also spent sometime travelling. He travelled on a regular basis to Riyadh in Saudi Arabia, to Cyprus, and also to Kazan in Russia. In Kazan he was involved in the planning of the construction of a new airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Blacklisting: Anatomy of a Scandal Relations Labour
    CRI Industry practice Industry practice Blacklisting: anatomy of a scandal Labour relations The blacklisting scandal that erupted in 2009 is only now coming to a head. In April a decision is expected on whether four separate lawsuits against the UK’s largest contractors can be combined into one – lawsuits that together could be worth hundreds of millions pounds. Separately, the contractors’ attempt to limit their liability with a compensation scheme foundered in February amid acrimonious talks with representatives of the blacklisted workers. As the battle lines continue to form, David Rogers interviewed the whistleblowers to uncover how the scandal came to light. Here he explains what it means, what happens next, and asks what it is about the UK construction industry that gave rise to blacklisting in the first place For 40 years and more it had been rumoured that employers in In most cases, it was the board director in charge of HR. Nobody the British construction industry maintained and shared a list of else in the subscriber company could be called. As Kerr later told people to be kept off their sites. The evidence was plentiful, but it a parliamentary select committee: “Everybody recognised that this was anecdotal and circumstantial. In any case, some people were was secret, sensitive information.” known to be troublemakers. Construction is a big industry but What follows is the story of how the blacklist came to light, a closed world, and word gets around. Just because some people the way it operated, and what happened after its existence was couldn’t get a job no matter how many hundreds they applied for, exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Services
    Nuclear Services Continuity Safety Innovation Photo credits: EDF Energy • Sellafield Ltd. • VINCI Technology Centre UK Ltd. Contents History 2 Overview 4 New Build 6 Decommissioning 8 Generation 10 Case Studies ˇ New Nuclear - Sizewell B 1/10th Scale Model 12 ˇ Decommissioning - DCIC Drop Test 13 ˇ Decommissioning - Sellafield Friction Test 14 ˇ Generation - Sizewell B Dry Store 15 ˇ Generation - Boiler Closure Unit (BCU) Recovery Programme 16 Facilities 18 A Culture of Innovation 20 1 1 History Our pedigree goes back to the birth of UK Nuclear power in the 1950’s when the world’s first commercial nuclear power station was built at Calder Hall, now Sellafield. Taylor Woodrow Construction (TWC) were the civil engineering contractors on this project and materials, specifically concrete, development and trials were carried out at their R&D laboratories. In time the R&D laboratories became Taywood Engineering Ltd and following the acquisition of TWC by VINCI Plc we became VINCI Technology Centre UK Limited. 2 Over 60 years in the nuclear industry Station Design Construction Calder Hall No Yes Sizewell A Yes Yes Wylfa Yes Yes Hartlepool Yes Yes Heysham 1 Yes Yes Heysham 2 Yes (as NDA) Yes Torness Yes (as NDA) No Sizewell B Yes (as NDA) No *Nuclear Design Associates - a Joint Venture between Taylor Woodrow Construction and Sir Robert McAlpine 3 1 Overview We have been involved with the nuclear industry from the start, having helped develop the first generation of UK nuclear power stations. We continue to work in the generation, decommissioning and defence sectors. Our Nuclear services team are fully SQEP and security cleared.
    [Show full text]
  • 02 the Use of Lean Processes Swansea University's Bay
    THE VINCI CONSTRUCTION UK MAGAZINE SHARING EXPERIENCE, INNOVATION AND SUCCESS ISSUE 47 / JUNE 2014 02 DELIVERING ESSENTIAL SERVICES THE USE OF LEAN PROCESSES 04 FOCUS PROJECT SWANSEA UNIVERSITY’S BAY CAMPUS MANAGING DIRECTOR’S WELCOME CONTENTS 04 WELCOME TO THE CONTENTS FOCUS PROJECT LATEST EDITION OF 01 MANAGING DIRECTOR’S WELCOME SWANSEA UNIVERSITY’S 02 DELIVERING ESSENTIAL SERVICES — BAY CAMPUS THE USE OF LEAN PROCESSES 04 FOCUS PROJECT — SWANSEA UNIVERSITY’S BAY CAMPUS 08 CHALLENGES — ENERGY RECOVERY IN CORNWALL There are positive signs that the construction industry 12 EXPERTISE — ON BOARD WITH BIM has finally reached the end of the recession. As the 14 BEYOND CONSTRUCTION - INNOVATION DISSEMINATION market picks up, this will present its own challenges, but with challenges come opportunities, and at the company’s 16 NEWS ROUND-UP annual road show events held recently in London, 20 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Manchester and Nottingham, it gave me great pleasure to 23 AWARDS AND ACCREDITATIONS share with our teams what these look like, both for VINCI 26 CONSIDERATE CONSTRUCTORS SCHEME on a global scale and closer to home in the UK. 27 OUR PEOPLE For VINCI this means increasing its international presence outside Europe, bringing exciting opportunities for both individuals and the business. In January this year we set up a Highways Sector within Taylor Woodrow Civil Engineering to pool our vast knowledge and expertise in preparation for the investment and resulting growth in the highways sector during the next parliament. In the Nine Elms area of central London, we are involved in the New Covent Garden Market project as part of a 50:50 joint venture with developer St Modwen.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Meeting Report 7 January 2015 Held at Energus, Workington, Cumbria
    Member Meeting Report 7 January 2015 Held at Energus, Workington, Cumbria PRESENTATIONS – download presentations from meeting date Event Diary entry on BECBC website • NS4P: sustaining skills for a safe and secure nuclear future – Liz Hearnden, NSAN • CoNE Update – Barry Watkinson • ISA (Infrastructure Strategic Alliance) Headlines – Andy van Schaick, Sellafield NB: Full presentation will be given next month (4 Feb 2015) • Member Presentation: Cumbria Community Foundation – Glenys Kett • Innovus Update and Future Events – Adrian Davis-Johnston • Allerdale Broadband – David Jones • GROW:Offshore Wind/BEC Funding Awareness – Chris Ward, PCDA Consulting NEW MEMBERS (since 1 November 2014): - APS Events and Media - Mayflower Engineering Ltd - Britton-Hillary Ltd - Stephenson Halliday Ltd - Camerton Consultants Limited Thomas Graham & Sons Ltd - Fusion Go Ltd BECBC SECTOR GROUPS – see BECBC website Events page - Business Support Group: 4 Feb 2015 at Oily’s, near Workington - Construction, Manufacturing and Nuclear New Build: 10 February 2015 at UClan, Samuel Lindow Building, Westlakes Science andTechnology Park, Whitehaven - Socio Economic: 16 January 2015 Summergrove Halls, Whitehaven BECBC BOARD NEWS - 2015 Member Fees –now due and renewal notices have been posted out - BECBC Reusable Member Badges Each member present was given a reusable member badge for use at future BECBC events – initially one per member company will be allocated, please contact [email protected] if you would like yours. - BECBC Member Meeting Banner
    [Show full text]
  • The Arup Journal
    THE ARUP JOURNAL WINTER 1991/92 Front cover: Kwun Tong Bypass. Hong Kong. under construction (Photo: L. M. Lui) THEARUP Back cover: Clerestory detail , National Gallery Sainsbury Wing JOURNAL (Photo: Peter Mackinven) Vol.26 No.4 Editor Winter 1991/92 David J. Brown Art Editor: Desmond Wyeth FCSD Published by Deputy Editor: Ove Arup Partnership Helene Murphy 13 Fitzroy Street, Editorial Assistant London Wt P 690 Joanne Worrall 3 Kwun Tong Bypass, Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong designed the structure. including Hong Kong foundations. columns. and precast segmental deck. for 3.7km of Klaus Falbe-Hansen elevated highway on the Kwun Tong waterfront, alongside Kai Tak airport in Kowloon Bay. 8 Soda ash project, Ove Arup were responsible for the civil, structural, building, Sua Pan, Botswana foundation, and infrastructure engineering of this new plant to Colin Dittmer, Ernie Hall recover industrial soda ash from a 150km2 wellfield in a remote corner of Southern Africa. 12 Communications and This survey of work by Arups' Communications and IT Group Information technology includes communications infrastructures for the Department of Education and Science head office; the new Toyota plant; Hewlett­ Packard at Bracknell; Cellnet, Slough; and Hambros Bank; as well as a study for London Fire Brigade. 16 Welbeck: Arup Economics & Planning examined the economic and financial economics and finance viability of two alternative proposals for reclaiming 325ha of Jim Nyhan, Jonathan Mitchell despoiled land in West Yorkshire, by landforming with colliery spoil and waste from local sources. 17 Fabric engineering: This new office block at London Wall 1n the City of London The Lee House experience allowed a team of Arup engineers to develop a 'fabric John Pilkington, Neil Noble, engineering' service for the architect, integrating the wide range of and David Anderson technologies available for use on building envelope elements into an overall design approach.
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 Current Contract Opportunities
    HS2 Current Contract Opportunities Indicative Budget HS2 Reference No. Description Status Contract Award Date Tenderers / Suppliers with contact details Link to Contract Notice Range Framework awarded to: ‐ BAM Ritchies ‐ a division of BAM Nuttall Ltd ‐ [email protected] ‐ Environmental Scientifics Group Limited ‐ [email protected] ‐ Fugro Seacore Limited (trading as Fugro Engineering Services) ‐ [email protected] ‐ Soil Engineering Geoservices Limited ‐ ray.nix@soil‐engineering.co.uk http://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:51 Phase One: HS2/086 Ground Investigation Works Framework Agreement Frameworks Awarded Q1 2015 £50m ‐ £100m ‐ Structural Soils Limited ‐ [email protected] 012‐2015:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0 ‐ Allied Exploration & Geotechnics Limited ‐ [email protected] ‐ Farmer Associates (1998) Limited ‐ [email protected] ‐ RPS Planning and Development Ltd ‐ [email protected] ‐ WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited ‐ [email protected] Awarded to: ‐ CH2M HILL, Atkins Limited and SENER ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS Ltd ‐ http://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:17 Phase One: Ref 369 Engineering Delivery Partner (EDP) Awarded Q1 2016 £250m ‐ £350m [email protected] 4639‐2015:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0 ITT shortlist: ‐ CEK JV (Carillion Construction Limited, Eiffage Travaux Publics, Kier Infrastructure and Overseas) ‐ loftus.buhagiar@carillionplc ‐ Costain Skanska JV (Costain Limited, Skanska Construction Limited)‐ http://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:93 Phase One: EWC12101 Enabling Works South ITT issued on 14th March 2016 Q3 2016 £300m
    [Show full text]
  • League Tables
    July 2017 League Tables Glenigan league tables are produced from comprehensive UK construction activity data. We capture every planning application and decision, plus thousands of projects that do not require planning. Projects are tracked to completion on site by our team of researchers that make over one million phone calls per year to provide timely, robust data. Glenigan data is widely used by contractors, materials suppliers and service providers to the construction industry to identify new business opportunities and inform strategic decisions. League tables included: Contact us on 0800 373 771 for more details or visit www.glenigan.com Rules for inclusion in the league tables: No contract under £250,000; no schedule of rates; term maintenance or framework contracts although individual contracts within frameworks are included. Contracts are only included at financial close not preferred bidder stage. For more information on how to take part in the league tables email [email protected]. Glenigan clients include top contractor league tables July 2017 TOP 50 CONTRACTORS - June 2017 TOP 50 CONTRACTORS - July 2016 to June 2017 Pos. Contractor Deals Total (£m) Pos. Contractor Deals Total (£m) 1 Galliford Try 10 320.3 9 1 Morgan Sindall 342 2,648.5 0 2 Morgan Sindall 44 264.8 2 2 Laing O’Rourke 29 2,433.4 0 3 Willmott Dixon 22 148.1 9 3 Sir Robert McAlpine 35 2,375.9 0 4 Interserve 21 133 32 4 Kier 285 2,283.3 0 5 Kier 18 119.5 2 5 Galliford Try 124 1,877.9 0 6 Keepmoat 11 110.4 7 6 Royal BAM 86 1,515.9 0 7 North Midland 5 105.2
    [Show full text]
  • New Civil Engineer in Association with Sir Robert Mcalpine | December 2019
    150th Anniversary Supplement SIR ROBERT MCALPINE NEVER IN ITS 150 YEARS HAS THERE BEEN A ENGINEERING ACTIVITY TO FURTHER ENHANCE BETTER TIME TO BE A CIVIL ENGINEER AT SIR ITS BREADTH AND RESILIENCE. A CAREFULLY ROBERT MCALPINE. STRONG AND FLOURISHING, CONSTRUCTED STRATEGY LOOKS SET TO OFFER THE COMPANY IS ACTIVELY BOOSTING ITS CIVIL OUTSTANDING PROSPECTS FOR YEARS TO COME P02 SIR ROBERT P06 TEAMBUILDING MCALPINE AND CIVILS P12 DIVERSE TALENTS: In association with P04 CIVILS IN FUTURE DIFFERENT CAREERS SIR ROBERT MCALPINE 150th ANNIVERSARY SUPPLEMENT READY FOR ANYTHING Sir Robert McAlpine has prospered for c the last 150 years and remains family Sir Robert M Alpine’s new civil owned. I have to ensure what is still a highly successful enterprise maintains engineering business unit is and furthers that success in the years building on traditional values to to come. Resilience is being built through become a future proofed force Paul selective diversification of our revenue Hamer streams, in particular expanding back in UK construction. Managing into civil engineering. We will remain focused on the sectors and markets in director Tony Gates narrates the which we have true core competencies. Our strategy is to go deeper into what we know. story to Ty Byrd. I would like 30% of revenues to come from the public sector (hence the expansion of civil engineering capability) as this market tends to be more long term, stable and resilient. Current live examples are High Speed 2 and Highways England. THE STRATEGY We also want a similar percentage of our revenues to be Sir Robert McAlpine spent the first 100 delivered through construction management, where we of its 150 successful years in business are working with significant clients who want an integrated engaging with steel and concrete in a delivery partner to help them shape their end products.
    [Show full text]