DOCSLIB.ORG

Ueshons for Egil Krogh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ueshons for Egil Krogh WXPOSt AUG 1 6 1973 Rowland Evans and Robert Novak ueshons for Egil Krogh If the Democratic' majority of the his resignation as under secretary of must be impeached before he can be Ervin committee has its way, former transportation. Since then, on advice indicted. presidential aide Egil (Bud) Krogh of counsel, he has taken. the Fifth Uncorroborated testimony by de- soon will be summoned to a closed- Amendment before both a House com- is mittee and the county grand jury in posed White House counsel Dean door interview to answer this porten- that Krogh informed him that John D: tous question: Did President Nixon Los Angeles investigating the bur- personally order or authorize the 1971 glary. Ehrlichman, in over-all charge of the burglary of Daniel Ellsberg's psychia- Although Republican members con- Plumbers, did 'not know in advance trist's office? tend the Fielding burglary is outside about the Fielding burglary but that If the answer is no, the committee the Ervin committee's scope, Chair- orders for the break in came "right out will not probe much deeper into the man Sam Ervin and chief counsel Sam of the Oval Office." When Assistant Ellsberg case. If the answer is yes, Dash want a private interview with Atty. Gen. Henry Petersen informed Krogh will have set the scene for a cri- Krogh during the present recess. If the President about the Fielding bur- sis dwarfing anything yet spawned by Krogh then reveals that the President glary last April 18, Petersen testified the Watergate scandal and, indeed, un- or some other high official authorized before the Ervin committee, Mr. Nixon precedented in this country's history. the burglary, the committee will grant told him, "That is a national security Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox is Krogh limited immunity — as it did matter. You stay out of that" (an order known to reject the White House argu- John Dean — to testify in open session later reversed on Petersen's urgings). ment that the Sept. 3, 1971, break-in by , without danger of further prosecution. Krogh's boss, White House domestic the White House Plumbers unit at the Krogh could prove •uncooperative. chief Ehrlichman, told the Ervin com- office of Dr. Lewis J. Fielding in Bev- His lawyers told us they have not de- mittee that the burglary "was totally erly Hills, Calif., was a legitimate exer- cided whether to grant Dash a private unanticipated, unauthorized by me." cise of national security powers. If fed- interview. But even if the Ervin com- Nevertheless, Ehrlichman and his at- eral charges are brought against the mittee is frustrated, the search for the torney, John Wilson, passionately de- burglars, an indictment may well be_ source of the Fielding burglary will fended the burglary on national secu- sought against the government official not end. rity grounds. The widespread interpre- who authorized the burglary — even if Much to the irritation of top White tation: they were trying to protect not it is the President of the United House aides, the special prosecutor's Ehrlichman but President Nixon. States. If Krogh fingers the President, the Plumbe The national security argument has the dormant campaign to imPeach Mr, bigoperations. staff is probing One of Cox'sall senior firs'eu- obvious flaws. Ehrlichman contended Nixon will be energized. tenants — William Merrill, former that Ellsberg had leaked the papers to Thus, Bud Krogh, once a conscien- chief assistant U.S. attorney in Detroit the Soviet embassy as well as the press tious, well-liked and publicly anony- — was recently dispatched to Los An- and that the FBI did not adequately in- mous middle-level• aide at the White geles leading a task force investigating vestigate Ellsberg. In fact, the FBI did House, can assume historical impor- the Fielding burglary. a thorough job on the case and could tance. His former colleagues agree on find no truth in the Soviet leak rumor., two points: first, he never would have Cox says nothing publicly, but his authorized the Plumbers to break into thinking is believed to follow these Accordingly, federal prosecutors are Fielding's office without approval from lines: whatever the Los Angeles grand inclined to move against the Plumbers, higher authority; second, the devoutly jury does, he considers both the bur- their supervisors and anybody in high religious Krogh ("straight arrow" is glars and ,their superiors subject to office mixed up in the burglary. the most frequent description) could federal criminal statutes., He rejects Whether Krogh puts the President in not lie under oath. both the national security rationaliza- that category is a question that may An affidavit in May by Krogh admit- tion and the White House constitu- deeply influence America's history. .• ted the Fielding burglary, leading to tional thesis that a sitting President (c) 1973, Field Enterprises, Inc. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Krogh & the Watergate Scandal
    Krogh & the Watergate Scandal Egil “Bud” Krogh was a young lawyer who worked for the Nixon administration in the late 1960s and early 1970s as deputy assistant to the president. Military analyst Daniel Ellsberg leaked the “Pentagon Papers,” which contained sensitive information regarding the United States’ progress in the Vietnam War. President Nixon himself tasked Krogh with stopping leaks of top-secret information. And Nixon’s Assistant for Domestic Affairs, John Ehrlichman, instructed Krogh to investigate and discredit Ellsberg, telling Krogh that the leak was damaging to national security. Krogh and another staffer assembled a covert team that became known as the “plumbers” (to stop leaks), which was broadly supervised by Ehrlichman. In September 1971, the plumbers’ first break-in was at the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist; they were looking for documents that would discredit Ellsberg based on mental health. Reflecting on the meeting in which the break-in was proposed and approved, Krogh later wrote, “I listened intently. At no time did I or anyone else there question whether the operation was necessary, legal or moral. Convinced that we were responding legitimately to a national security crisis, we focused instead on the operational details: who would do what, when and where.” The break-in, which was illegal, was also unproductive. Nothing was found to discredit Ellsberg. Importantly, the ties between this break-in and Nixon were much more direct and easy to establish than the ties between Nixon and the Watergate break-in. Krogh later pled guilty to his role in the break-in and was sentenced to two-to-six years in prison.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 3 Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides To
    Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit' Page 1 of 3 !Donate Home | Contact UserName Login Not registered yet? About Timelines Blog Donate Volunteer Search Go !! History Commons Alert, Exciting News Home » Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit' Printer-Friendly View Email to Friend Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Increase Text Size Lawsuit' Decrease Text Size Ordering Date ascending This is a scalable context timeline. It contains events related to the event 1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit. You can narrow or Time period broaden the context of this timeline by adjusting the zoom level. The lower the scale, the more relevant the items on average will be, while the higher the scale, Email Updates the less relevant the items, on average, will be. Receive weekly email updates 1 2 3 4 5 summarizing what contributors have added to the History Commons database Email Address Here Go 1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit Donate International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT) acquires three Developing and maintaining smaller corporations, prompting the US Justice Department to this site is very labor file suits against ITT charging that the mergers violate antitrust intensive. If you find it useful, laws. Between 1969 and April 1971, ITT officials meet with please give us a hand and donate what you can. several Nixon administration officials, including Vice President Donate Now Spiro Agnew; White House aides John Ehrlichman, Charles ITT logo. [Source: Colson, and Egil Krogh; Cabinet secretaries John Connally and Private Line.com] Maurice Stans; Justice Department officials John Mitchell and Volunteer Richard Kleindienst; and others, in attempts to persuade the If you would like to help us administration to drop the lawsuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a Telephone Conversation Between
    Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Henry A. Kissinger. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 at an unknown time between 1:27 and 1:29 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 440-35.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -White House response -White Paper -National security Conversation Number 39-4 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Hugh Scott. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 between 1:36 and 1:38 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 440-38.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Scott's actions, May 23 -Ronald L. Ziegler Scott's schedule Watergate -White House response -National security -Effect on United States foreign policy -Scott's possible statement -Scott's statement, May 23 Conversation Number 39-5 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Leslie C. Arends. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 between 1:39 and 1:40 p.m. [This conversation is cross- referenced with conversation 440-39.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Republican congressmen's morale -White House response -White Paper -National security -Effect on United States foreign policy Conversation Number 39-16 Portions of a telephone conversation between the President and Alexander M. Haig, Jr. These portions were recorded on May 25, 1973 at an unknown time between 12:58 and 1:25 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 The akM ing of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Essay The Making of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan* I. INTRODUCTION Shortly after I resigned my position as General Counsel of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department in 1971, I was startled to receive a two-page letter from Attorney General John Mitchell. I was not a Department of Justice employee, and Mitchell's acquaintance with me was largely second-hand. The contents were surprising. Mitchell generously lauded my rather modest role "in developing an effective and professional law enforcement program for the District of Columbia." Beyond this, he added, "Your thoughtful suggestions have been of considerable help to me and my colleagues at the Department of Justice." The salutation was, "Dear Jerry," and the signature, "John." I was elated. I framed the letter and hung it in my office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Edward Jay Epstein Collection #818
    The Inventory of the Edward Jay Epstein Collection #818 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ... , EPSTEIN, EDWARD JAY (1935- ) Deposit May 1979 The Edward Jay Epstein Collection consists primarily of research material for three of Mr. Epstein's more prominent works: LEGEND: THE SECRET WORLD OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD, a study of the activ­ ities of the assassin of President John F. Kennedy prior to the assas­ sination; AGENCY OF FEAR: OPIATES AND POLITICAL POWER IN AMERICA, an investigation of the Nixon Admi.nistration's war on drugs in the early 197Os; and NEWS FROM NOWHERE: TELEVISION AND THE NEWS, a report on electronic journalism and the television industry•. The·~_Epstein Col­ lection also contains galleys and some notes pertaining to BETWEEN FACT AND FICTION: THE PROBLEM OF JOURNALISM as well as drafts of some of Mr. Epstein's articles and reviews. In addition, there are small amounts of personal material including correspondence and syllabi and student papers from college courses taught by Mr. Epstein and bits and pieces of various research projects. The extensive research material for LEGEND includes FBI, CIA, Secret Service and State Department files on Lee Harvey Oswald and Marina.·. Oswald, reports and interviews with Marines who served with Oswald and other persons who knew him and had contact with him prior to the Kennedy assassination. The AGENCY OF FEAR material contains a lengthy transcript of an interview with Egil Krogh, Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs in the Nixon White House, and the White House files of Krogh and Jeffrey Donfeld, Staff Assistant to President Nixon, per­ taining to the Administration's war on drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Memories of the Ellsberg Break-In Stephen Trott
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 51 | Issue 4 Article 14 1-2000 Memories of the Ellsberg Break-In Stephen Trott Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen Trott, Memories of the Ellsberg Break-In, 51 Hastings L.J. 765 (2000). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol51/iss4/14 This Panel is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Memories of the Ellsberg Break-In transcribedremarks of THE HONORABLE STEPHEN TROTr* Introduction by Fred Altshuler, Esq.: As a deputy district attorney in Los Angeles County, Stephen Trott prosecuted presidential assistant John Ehrlichman and G. Gordon Liddy for the burglary of the office of Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist. I would now like to ask Judge Trott to give some of his views of the type of White House conduct that occurred during the Watergate era. Judge Troll: I had a fascinating window into this whole business. I was a deputy district attorney in Los Angeles County in charge of the organized crime division. I spent my time on cases involving CIA- trained Cuban bombers, militants shooting up UCLA, drugs, a rattlesnake being placed in the mailbox of a lawyer who was suing an operation called Synanon, and various pornography cases involving X-rated films like "Deep Throat" and "The Devil and Miss Jones." One odd day, my boss, Los Angeles County District Attorney Joe Busch, called me in and said: "Get your butt over to federal court, someone named Howard Hunt is about to blow the whistle on a burglary in Beverly Hills." Now, what was going on? In June of 1972, the Watergate break-in took the lid off this whole thing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ellsberg Break-In Case
    SFChronicle MAY 1 3 1973 los angeles The Ellsberg Break-in Case . ENIOR agency officials 1--) were "angry and de- pressed." • According to a The testimony described • source with close connec- how Hunt and co-conspirator tions to the Central Intelli- G. Gordon Liddy first g e n c e Agency. officials "cased" the doctor's home felt that "irreparable dam- neighborhood and his office: age" had been done to the how they secured a special organization. "They think," camera for the job from the said the source, "that the CIA and how they visited a whole project was an abso- CIA "safehouse" in Wash- ton to secure disguises and lute violation of the CIA's false identification materi- charter." als. The ',"whole project" in Last week, The New York question was none other Times reported that General than the alleged break-in at the Beverly Hills offices of Robert Cushman Jr., the Marine Corps commandant Daniel Ellsberg's psychia- who, in 1971, was deputy trist. It was the second time director of Central Intelli- a major U.S. government- gence, had authorized the al agency had been be- use of CIA material and re- smirched by the Watergate search in the Ellsberg files affair. And, ironically, the first agency to be so stained This World, Sunday, May 13, — the FBI — was Inow in- volved in the investigation of the second. The CIA's role in the plot surfaced last weekend when Grand Jury testimony given by Watergate conspirator E. grand jury that he believed Howard Hunt was released that cooperation with the , by the Pentagon 'Papers CIA had been arranged by trial judge, Matt Byrne.
    [Show full text]
  • March 1-31, 1972
    ,.. -'--- -------=-=-.....-.---=--=:-~-::-:-:-=---::":":::-=-:~-::-::-:-:-:~"';:-:I:-=::------------., >':~Z WHITE :iOiJSE PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON'S DAILY u ARY P (S<c Travel Record for Travel AClivity) ," ._'..,'._-- ------------....;...--------------:-:~-:--::----:-:~----I , :" ,'cr.'),'.• :'EGAN DATE (Mo., Day, Yr.) MARCH 1, 1972 THE WHITE HOUSE TIMB DAY WASHINGTON, D. C. 8:00 a.m. WEDNESDAY PHONE TIME P=Placcd R=Rcccivcd ACTlVllY 10 Out Lo LD 8:00 The President had breakfast. 8:12 The President went to the Oval Office. 8:32 8:33 The President met with his Deputy Assistant, Alexander P. Butterfield. 8:40 8:43 The President met with Mr. Butterfield. 8:50 9:08 P The President talked with his Special Counsel, Charles W. Colson. 9:10 The President went to the Barber Shop. 9:23 The President returned to the Oval Office. The President met with: 9:23 9:50 John B. Connally, Secretary of the Treasury 9:24 9:25 Henry A. Kissinger, Assistant 9:25 9:30 Mr. Butterfield 9:49 10:00 Mr. Butterfield 9:57 11:19 H. R. Haldeman, Assistant 10:00 10:12 Ronald L. Ziegler, Press Secretary 11:14 11 :17 Mr. Butterfield 11:19 P The President telephoned the First Lady. The call was not completed. 11 :20 11:25 The President met with Mr. Butterfield. 11:22 P The President telephoned Staff Assistant Ronald H. Walker. The call was not completed. The President met with: 11:26 12:08 George P. Shultz, Director of the OMB 12:05 12:17 Mr. Kissinger 12:09 12:10 Mr. Butterfield 12:10 12:12 Mr. Haldeman 11:27 11:29 P The President talked with the First Lady.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Prosecutor (5)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 61, folder “Special Prosecutor (5)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. r Digitized from Box 61 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library .,,- .. OFFICE OE THE DEPUTY ATIORNEY GENERAL Returned without review by Deputy Attorney General. - THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Sept. 19, 1974 To: Mr. Silberman From: Phil Areeda We have the original. This is the only copy. And perhaps it should not be copied further. We have not sent any copy to Miller and probably should not until we all have a chance to talk. LAW OFFICES tLLJi;H, CASSIDY, LARROCA 8c LEwn "'--" 1,20 19TH STREET. N.W. • SIJITE ?100 WASHINGTON. D. C. 2.0035 - AREA CODE 202 Till.IEPHONI!; 2a3.e400 UUIERT .J. Ml\.1.ER, .JR. .JOSEPH &. MCCARTHY :lli"I JOSEPH CASSIDY COURTNEY A. £v1'.N5 "YMONO G. LARROCA 01' COUNSEi.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship January 2016 Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA Chris Collins Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Chris, "Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA" (2016). Online Theses and Dissertations. 352. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/352 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nixon’s Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA By Christopher M. Collins Bachelor of Arts Eastern Kentucky University Richmond, Kentucky 2011 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December, 2016 Copyright © Christopher M. Collins, 2016 All rights reserved ii Acknowledgments I could not have completed this thesis without the support and generosity of many remarkable people. First, I am grateful to the entire EKU history department for creating such a wonderful environment in which to work. It has truly been a great experience. I am thankful to the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Robert Weise, Dr. Carolyn Dupont, and especially Dr. Thomas Appleton, who has been a true friend and mentor to me, and whose kind words and confidence in my work has been a tremendous source of encouragement, without which I would not have made it this far.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHMUNC IV Crisis Committee: Watergate Scandal Start Date: June 18, 1972 (Day of Watergate Break-In) Chair: Richard Nixon
    NORTHMUNC IV Crisis Committee: Watergate Scandal Start Date: June 18, 1972 (day of Watergate break-in) Chair: Richard Nixon History: In the 1968 election, the death of Robert F. Kennedy opened the doors for previous Vice President Hubert Humphrey to become the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate. On the other side was Republican Richard Nixon, who ran on a platform promoting domestic and foreign peace. Nixon claimed victory over the White House by 500,000 popular votes. Once in office, Nixon’s greatest problem was the Vietnam War. How was he going to stop it and fulfil the promises he had made to the American public during his campaign? The war was widely unpopular among the American people and resulted in many protests demanding peace. Nixon urged the American people to be patient and pursued negotiations. By the end of Nixon’s first year in office, he sported a 59% approval rating. At the end of his second year, that figure had fallen to 52%. At the beginning of 1972, Nixon’s approval rating reached a high of 62%. Possible causes of Nixon’s high approval ratings include landing the first man on the moon in 1969 and running a successful re-election campaign. It is safe to say that Nixon was relatively popular amongst the American people during his first term. During the 1972 election, the Democratic Party chose George McGovern as their nomination over Senator Edmund Muskie. The Republican Party renominated Richard Nixon. In early June, it seemed likely that Nixon would win his second presidential election as many Americans believed he was taking the right course of action in Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • F:\Nixon -- Move to Former Staff on 9.2\Declarations
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ___________________________________________) DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Allison M. Zieve (D.C. Bar No. 424786) Michael T. Kirkpatrick (D.C. Bar No. 486293 Public Citizen Litigation Group 1600 20th Street NW Washington, DC 20009 (202) 588-1000 Counsel for Petitioners TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab Declaration of Stanley Kutler.................................................... A Declaration of Julian Helisek (including exhibits) ................................... B Declaration of Richard J. Davis .................................................. C Declaration of John W. Dean III ................................................. D Declaration of David M. Dorsen ................................................. E Declaration of Mark Feldstein ................................................... F Declaration of Don Fulsom ..................................................... G Declaration of David Greenberg ................................................. H Declaration of Kenneth J. Hughes, Jr. .............................................. I Declaration of Thomas Long ....................................................
    [Show full text]