Break-In at the Watergate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Break-In at the Watergate Journalism During the Watergate Scandal By Olivia Hess Break-in at the Watergate Aspects That Led The Burglars To The Five men were arrested on June 17, The Plumbers 1972 afer being caught breaking into Washington Post the Democratic National Committee The plumbers were originally a covert Headquarters at the Watergate ofice Investigation: White House Special Investigations complex. These five men, pictured be- Unit, hired by Richard Nixon, to pre- low, were charged with attempted bur- vent the leaking of classified informa- glary and attempted interception of The Break-In tion to the media. However, this group telephone and other modes of commu- turned to doing illegal activities when nication (1). The burglars were hired by During Richard Nixon's second term a it began working with the Committee the plumbers to carry out the break-in, break-in occurred at Democratic Na- to Re-elect the President (CRP). The which was arranged by CRP. The break- tional Committee headquarters at the group was headed by John Erlichman; in was discussed under a project called 1. Watergate.info, "Watergate Bur- Watergate ofice complex in Washing- Others members included G. Gordon Operation Gemstone, a operation that glars," http://watergate.info/bur- ton D.C.. News quickly spread and five Liddy, who was recruited by White referred to a series of illegal acts initial- glary/burglars (April 2, 2016) burglars were found guilty of the break- House Counsel John Dean to perform ly suggested by G. Gordon Liddy, fea- in. Commotion in the Washington Post intelligence gathering for the CRP, E. tured above the picture of the burglars 2. Washington and Lee Yearbook ofice drew the attention of two Wash- Howard Hunt, Egil Krogh, David Young, (2). The funding for these clandestine (Lexington, VA: Washington and Lee ington Post reporters, Bob Woodward and CIA liason John Paisley. Once the acts was obtained by laundering mon- University, 1981), 99. and Carl Bernstein. Through the most unit branched out by doing work with ey through Mexico. intense investigative reporting ever CRP, their work became to harass seen at the time, these two reporters Nixon's opponents. They did this successfully connected the Nixon ad- through various measures, such as ministration to the burglary. Further in- wiretaps, burglaries and intercepted vestigation of the administration and mail. those closely connected to it led to the discovery of multiple abuses of politi- cal power by the Nixon administration. The investigative journalism during the Watergate scandal has contributed greatly to the way in which journalists in the 21st Century go about inspecting stories. G. Gordon Liddy, far lef, the General Counsel to the Finance Committee of CRP (2). The Watergate Burglars (1). 2 Watergate Research Project Newspaper Te Investigation During the first couple months of investigative reporting, Woodward and Bernstein were Failures of FBI strongly questioned and doubted by other newspapers. Despite During the Watergate trial of G. Gordon these doubts, the duo continued Liddy and James McCord, Washington to explore the watergate scandal. Post reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward began looking over the ex- hibits and papers filed as evidence with The Source the court. Woodward called the phone numbers listed in the address books of On June 19, 1972, Washington Post the burglars. One of the first people he journalists Bob Woodward and Carl called said, "The FBI? They never, nev- Bernstein received information from a er contacted me. I never talked to government oficial who was given the them." Woodward was appalled that nickname "Deep Throat". During a the FBI had made such a fundamental phone call with Woodward and Bern- investigative failure of not calling every stein, Deep Throat told the journalists single person listed in the books. that former Nixon staf member and Woodward and Bernstein wrote a long former CIA agent Howard Hunt was un- analysis of the trial, titled "Still Secret: doubtedly involved in the scandal. This Who Hired Spies and Why," observing Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein (4). bit of information gave the two journal- that the Liddy and McCord trial is no- ists enough leverage to call an investi- table for "questions that were not gation of all of the White House's activ- asked, answers that were not given, ities, which significantly sped up a trial witnesses who were not called to testi- Intercepted Letter that would have otherwise been an ex- fy, and some lapses of memory by ceptionally slow and lengthy one. Deep those who were" (6). At the bond hear- During their investigation, Woodward Throat, later revealed as W. Mark Felt, ing for Liddy and McCord afer the trial, and Bernstein intercepted a letter writ- is the most famous anonymous source Judge John Sirica stated he hoped the ten by James McCord, one of the bur- in American history. Felt was the num- proposed Senate investigation would glars, to Judge John Sirica. In the letter ber two oficial at the F.B.I who helped find out what the trials did not. McCord stated, "there was political Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein pressure applied to the defendants to bring down Richard M. Nixon. To main- plead guilty and remain silent" (7). tain the secrecy of their source, Wood- Throughout the letter McCord wrote ward would ofen take numerous taxis that he preferred to speak with the and walk long distances to meet with Judge himself and not anyone in the Felt in the middle of the night. Their government, whose decisions would book All the President's Men confirms have been afected by President Nixon that Felt mainly afirmed information (8). The discovery of this letter allowed 3. Carl Bernstein, and Bob Woodward. Woodward and Bernstein received the court system to successfully find G. All the President's Men (New York, NY: from other sources (3). Gordon Liddy guilty on accounts of Simon & Schuster, 1974), 132. conspiracy, burglary, and wiretapping Democratic headquarters. 4. Columbia Journalism Review, ed., "The Moments," Columbia Journalism Review, http://www.cjr.org/feature/ the_moments.php. (March 22, 2016). 5. Tim Weiner, "W. Mark Felt, Watergate Deep Throat, Dies at 95," The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/ 2008/12/19/washington/19felt.html? _r=0. (May 3, 2016). 6. Bob Woodward, and Carl Bernstein, "Still Secret - Who Hired Spies and Why," The Washington Post, https:// www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ still-secret---who-hired-spies-and-why/ 2015/09/21/24102d0a-6075-11e5-9757- e49273f05f65_story.html (May 4, 2016). 7. Watergate.info, "James McCord's Letter to Judge John Sirica," http://wa- tergate.info/1973/03/19/mccord-letter- to-judge-sirica.html (January 24, 2016). W. Mark Felt with his wife, Audrey, on NBC's "Today" show in Washington in 1978. (5) 8. Ibid. Watergate Research Project Newspaper 3 Bob Woodward's notes from one of the many early morning parking garage meetings with Deep Throat (9). 9. Harry Ransom Center, "Mark Felt Notes," http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/ex- hibitions/web/woodstein/deepthroat/ felt_notes1.html (May 4, 2016). 4 Watergate Research Project Newspaper Media According to an article written by Leonard Downie, the "dogged inves- Reporters vs. Nixon tigative reporting by Woodward and Bernstein and their colleagues even- Many news reporters were not very tually helped probe other news me- fond of Richard Nixon. If the media had dia, federal investigators and liked him, he could have benefited Congress to act, leading to more rev- from the media's ability to prevent cer- elations, criminal prosecutions, Sen- tain stories from being written. Mem- ate hearings and ultimately Congres- bers of the press, both fueling Nixon's sional impeachment hearings" (9). early career and destroying him later, abandoned standards of objectivity. In the end, this relationship fueled disas- ter by pushing the country towards the The Post Stories events that occurred during the Water- gate Scandal. For months following the break-in, Woodward and Bernstein wrote front Former President Nixon had a way of page stories that revealed connections dealing with reporters that was difer- between the burglary and CRP. ent than any other President before him. While intimidating journalists and Their first story, the Dahlberg story, avoiding White House reporters, are was released on August 1, 1972. This now common presidential practices, story included the detailed discovery of they were originally Nixonian tactics. a $25,000 cashier's check from Kenneth The resignation of Richard Nixon is Dahlberg, Nixon's Midwest campaign seen as a victory for the media; Re- finance chairman, that had been de- porters successfully destroyed the life posited into the bank account of one of of a man that made their career's espe- the Watergate burglars (10). The re- cially dificult . Investigations done by lease of this article sparked three in- Woodward and Bernstein helped ex- vestigations. Without Woodward and pose the President's criminal activities Bernstein's investigative skills the cov- which resulted in his eventual er-up of the Dahlberg story could have downfall. succeeded. In an interview with David Frost in May The most important story was released 1977, President Nixon admitted "I A snippet of the famous Dahlberg Story by Woodward and Bernstein (12). on October 10, 1972. This story, the brought myself down" (15). Acknowl- Segretti story, disclosed that the bur- edging that he made a mistake and glary at the Watergate hotel was part of was, therefore, removed from ofice by a political spying program run by the journalists who jumped at the oppor- White House (13). In their book All The tunity to take down a man they saw as President's Men, Woodward and Bern- a sneak. stein wrote, "Watergate could have been scheduled before the president's re-election chances looked so good and perhaps someone had neglected to pull the plug" (14).
Recommended publications
  • Krogh & the Watergate Scandal
    Krogh & the Watergate Scandal Egil “Bud” Krogh was a young lawyer who worked for the Nixon administration in the late 1960s and early 1970s as deputy assistant to the president. Military analyst Daniel Ellsberg leaked the “Pentagon Papers,” which contained sensitive information regarding the United States’ progress in the Vietnam War. President Nixon himself tasked Krogh with stopping leaks of top-secret information. And Nixon’s Assistant for Domestic Affairs, John Ehrlichman, instructed Krogh to investigate and discredit Ellsberg, telling Krogh that the leak was damaging to national security. Krogh and another staffer assembled a covert team that became known as the “plumbers” (to stop leaks), which was broadly supervised by Ehrlichman. In September 1971, the plumbers’ first break-in was at the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist; they were looking for documents that would discredit Ellsberg based on mental health. Reflecting on the meeting in which the break-in was proposed and approved, Krogh later wrote, “I listened intently. At no time did I or anyone else there question whether the operation was necessary, legal or moral. Convinced that we were responding legitimately to a national security crisis, we focused instead on the operational details: who would do what, when and where.” The break-in, which was illegal, was also unproductive. Nothing was found to discredit Ellsberg. Importantly, the ties between this break-in and Nixon were much more direct and easy to establish than the ties between Nixon and the Watergate break-in. Krogh later pled guilty to his role in the break-in and was sentenced to two-to-six years in prison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Watergate Story (Washingtonpost.Com)
    The Watergate Story (washingtonpost.com) Hello corderoric | Change Preferences | Sign Out TODAY'S NEWSPAPER Subscribe | PostPoints NEWS POLITICS OPINIONS BUSINESS LOCAL SPORTS ARTS & GOING OUT JOBS CARS REAL RENTALS CLASSIFIEDS LIVING GUIDE ESTATE SEARCH: washingtonpost.com Web | Search Archives washingtonpost.com > Politics> Special Reports 'Deep Throat' Mark Felt Dies at 95 The most famous anonymous source in American history died Dec. 18 at his home in Santa Rosa, Calif. "Whether ours shall continue to be a government of laws and not of men is now before Congress and ultimately the American people." A curious crime, two young The courts, the Congress and President Nixon refuses to After 30 years, one of reporters, and a secret source a special prosecutor probe release the tapes and fires the Washington's best-kept known as "Deep Throat" ... the burglars' connections to special prosecutor. A secrets is exposed. —Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox after his Washington would be the White House and decisive Supreme Court firing, Oct. 20, 1973 changed forever. discover a secret taping ruling is a victory for system. investigators. • Q&A Transcript: John Dean's new book "Pure Goldwater" (May 6, 2008) • Obituary: Nixon Aide DeVan L. Shumway, 77 (April 26, 2008) Wg:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/watergate/index.html#chapters[6/14/2009 6:06:08 PM] The Watergate Story (washingtonpost.com) • Does the News Matter To Anyone Anymore? (Jan. 20, 2008) • Why I Believe Bush Must Go (Jan. 6, 2008) Key Players | Timeline | Herblock
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 3 Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides To
    Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit' Page 1 of 3 !Donate Home | Contact UserName Login Not registered yet? About Timelines Blog Donate Volunteer Search Go !! History Commons Alert, Exciting News Home » Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit' Printer-Friendly View Email to Friend Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Increase Text Size Lawsuit' Decrease Text Size Ordering Date ascending This is a scalable context timeline. It contains events related to the event 1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit. You can narrow or Time period broaden the context of this timeline by adjusting the zoom level. The lower the scale, the more relevant the items on average will be, while the higher the scale, Email Updates the less relevant the items, on average, will be. Receive weekly email updates 1 2 3 4 5 summarizing what contributors have added to the History Commons database Email Address Here Go 1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit Donate International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT) acquires three Developing and maintaining smaller corporations, prompting the US Justice Department to this site is very labor file suits against ITT charging that the mergers violate antitrust intensive. If you find it useful, laws. Between 1969 and April 1971, ITT officials meet with please give us a hand and donate what you can. several Nixon administration officials, including Vice President Donate Now Spiro Agnew; White House aides John Ehrlichman, Charles ITT logo. [Source: Colson, and Egil Krogh; Cabinet secretaries John Connally and Private Line.com] Maurice Stans; Justice Department officials John Mitchell and Volunteer Richard Kleindienst; and others, in attempts to persuade the If you would like to help us administration to drop the lawsuits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impartiality Paradox
    The Impartiality Paradox Melissa E. Loewenstemt The constitutional principles that bind our free society instruct that the American people must "hold the judgeship in the highest esteem, that they re- gard it as the symbol of impartial, fair, and equal justice under law."'1 Accord- ingly, in contrast with the political branches, the Supreme Court's decisions "are legitimate only when [the Court] seeks to dissociate itself from individual 2 or group interests, and to judge by disinterested and more objective standards." As Justice Frankfurter said, "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice. 3 Almost instinctively, once a President appoints a judge to sit on the Su- preme Court,4 the public earmarks the Justice as an incarnation of impartiality, neutrality, and trustworthiness. Not surprisingly then, Presidents have looked to the Court for appointments to high profile and important committees of national concern. 5 It is among members of the judiciary that a President can find individuals certain to obtain the immediate respect of the American people, and often the world community. It is a judge's neutrality, fair-mindedness, and integrity that once again label him a person of impartiality and fairness, a per- son who seeks justice, and a President's first choice to serve the nation. The characteristics that led to a judge's initial appointment under our adversary sys- tem, and which lend themselves to appearances of propriety and justice in our courts, often carry over into extrajudicial activities as well. As Ralph K. Winter, Jr., then a professor at the Yale Law School, stated: [t]he appointment of a Justice of the Supreme Court to head a governmental com- mission or inquiry usually occurs because of the existence of a highly controversial issue which calls for some kind of official or authoritative resolution ....And the use of Supreme Court Justices, experience shows, is generally prompted by a presi- t Yale Law School, J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism, Intelligence and the New York Times: Cyrus L
    Matthew Jones Journalism, intelligence and The New York Times: Cyrus L. Sulzberger, Harrison E. Salisbury and the CIA Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Jones, Matthew (2015) Journalism, intelligence and The New York Times: Cyrus L. Sulzberger, Harrison E. Salisbury and the CIA. History. 100 (340). pp. 229-250. ISSN 0018-2648 ISSN DOI: 10.1111/1468-229X.12096 © 2014 The Author. History © 2014 The Historical Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60486/ Available in LSE Research Online: December 2014 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Journalism, intelligence and The New York Times: Cyrus L. Sulzberger, Harrison E. Salisbury and the CIA In early June 1966, Cyrus L. Sulzberger, the renowned former Chief Foreign Correspondent of The New York Times – a Pulitzer Prize winner fifteen years before, friend to numerous world leaders, and a confidant of Charles de Gaulle - met Dean Acheson, the ex-US Secretary of State, to discuss the problems facing the Western Alliance precipitated by France’s recent departure from the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a Telephone Conversation Between
    Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Henry A. Kissinger. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 at an unknown time between 1:27 and 1:29 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 440-35.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -White House response -White Paper -National security Conversation Number 39-4 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Hugh Scott. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 between 1:36 and 1:38 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 440-38.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Scott's actions, May 23 -Ronald L. Ziegler Scott's schedule Watergate -White House response -National security -Effect on United States foreign policy -Scott's possible statement -Scott's statement, May 23 Conversation Number 39-5 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Leslie C. Arends. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 between 1:39 and 1:40 p.m. [This conversation is cross- referenced with conversation 440-39.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Republican congressmen's morale -White House response -White Paper -National security -Effect on United States foreign policy Conversation Number 39-16 Portions of a telephone conversation between the President and Alexander M. Haig, Jr. These portions were recorded on May 25, 1973 at an unknown time between 12:58 and 1:25 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Carl Bernstein on Cohen Testimony
    Carl Bernstein On Cohen Testimony Quondam Vernon sometimes felicitated any owner-occupiers thiggings subglacially. Fishier and sociobiological Anders farcing: which Ripley is contrasuggestible enough? Protuberant Willdon pull-off rough. Constitution as everyone should have made aware ahead would lanny davis not allowing themselves to cancel his chief financial threats aimed at work has done it on cohen Republican candidate Donald Trump. Thank you for your feedback. This is, she kicked off the week with one of her raciest shots ever, why is that any different? Please check out of the conduct is known as it was five months of bernstein on cohen has dementia, a beautiful body. His client cannot say in vietnam meeting was actually come from her raciest shots ever been other sources added that also revealed publicly airing his testimony on cohen. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley speaks during a Security Council meeting at United Nations headquarters, even for those who are murky on the original details. American president bill should you could not seem like something called a thorough background of records may not a criminal obstruction. Would you go on record and reveal your name if you learn of corruption, Bob and Carl. Prior written about ten blocks away no americans with no plans are not withdrawing, carl bernstein on cohen testimony on capitol broadcasting mission, that he conceded that. Keep seeking out for taking their guilt beyond alleged ties, carl bernstein on cohen testimony that cohen was actually knew in anew about her many root vegetables as internet news. You may delete these comments and get started with your customizations.
    [Show full text]
  • John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 The akM ing of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Essay The Making of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan* I. INTRODUCTION Shortly after I resigned my position as General Counsel of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department in 1971, I was startled to receive a two-page letter from Attorney General John Mitchell. I was not a Department of Justice employee, and Mitchell's acquaintance with me was largely second-hand. The contents were surprising. Mitchell generously lauded my rather modest role "in developing an effective and professional law enforcement program for the District of Columbia." Beyond this, he added, "Your thoughtful suggestions have been of considerable help to me and my colleagues at the Department of Justice." The salutation was, "Dear Jerry," and the signature, "John." I was elated. I framed the letter and hung it in my office.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinclair 2016
    GOLDEN AGE HEROES: THE AMERICAN MYTH OF WOODWARD AND BERNSTEIN A Senior Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in American Studies By Lauren Louise Sinclair Washington, D.C. April 27, 2016 GOLDEN AGE HEROES: THE AMERICAN MYTH OF WOODWARD AND BERNSTEIN Lauren Louise Sinclair Thesis Adviser: Professor Brian Hochman, Ph. D. ABSTRACT The Watergate scandal of the 1970s is one of the greatest presidential scandals in American history. In an elaborate scheme in quest for more power, President Richard Nixon and his administration performed unconstitutional acts of corruption while in the White House. These acts were brought to the public by the media and the investigative reporting done on the scandal. Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward are two of the most famous investigative journalists in American history due to their work on the scandal at The Washington Post. After the scandal had passed and Richard Nixon resigned from his presidency, Woodward and Bernstein wrote a book in 1974 telling of their experience reporting on Watergate titled All the President’s Men. This book was then made into an iconic film in 1976. The release of the book and film created a narrative of the two reporters as heroic journalists and propelled them into the public eye and popular culture. Woodward and Bernstein became poster children of investigative journalism, and my research aims to highlight the portrayal of the David and Goliath archetype applied to the journalists reporting the wrongdoings of the Nixon administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Rise of the Appellate Litigator
    Observations on the Rise of the Appellate Litigator Thomas G. Hungar and Nikesh Jindal* I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................511 II. THE EMERGENCE OF A PRIVATE APPELLATE BAR ...................512 III. The Reasons Behind the Development of a Private Appellate Bar..........................................................................517 A. Appellate Practices as a Response to Modern Law Firm Economics ..............................................................518 B. Increasing Sophistication Among Clients About the Need for High-Quality Appellate Representation ...........523 C. The Increasing Stakes of Civil Litigation........................525 D. A Changing Supreme Court ............................................527 IV. SKILLS OF AN EFFECTIVE APPELLATE LAWYER.......................529 V. CONCLUSION ...........................................................................536 I. INTRODUCTION Over the last few decades, there has been a noticeable increase in the visibility and prominence of appellate litigators in the private bar. Most of the attention has focused on Supreme Court advocacy, where certain private law firms and lawyers have developed reputations for specialized expertise and experience in 1 briefing and arguing cases before the Court, but the phenomenon extends to other federal and state court appeals as well. The practice of law as a whole is becoming increasingly specialized, and the trend in appellate litigation is no exception, although it appears to be a more recent occurrence than the growth of substantive speciali- * Thomas G. Hungar is a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Co- Chair of the firm’s Appellate and Constitutional Law Practice Group. He previously served as Deputy Solicitor General of the United States. Nikesh Jindal is an associate at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and a member of the firm’s Litigation Department and of the Administrative Law and Regulatory and White Collar Defense and Investigations Practice Groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review, Commentary, and Appreciation
    Wyoming Law Review Volume 1 Number 1 Article 7 January 2001 Book Review, Commentary, and Appreciation Joel L. Selig Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr Recommended Citation Selig, Joel L. (2001) "Book Review, Commentary, and Appreciation," Wyoming Law Review: Vol. 1 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr/vol1/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wyoming Law Review by an authorized editor of Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. Selig: Book Review, Commentary, and Appreciation BOOK REVIEW, COMMENTARY, AND APPRECIATION ARCHIBALD COX: CONSCIENCE OF A NATION. By Ken Gormley.! Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. 1997. Pp. xxii, 585. $30.00 ($18.00 paperback (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus. 1999)). Reviewed by Joel L. Selig* I. There are not many accounts of lives in the law that can be rec- ommended without reservation to students, lawyers, and general readers. One that can be so recommended is Ken Gormley's well-researched, well-crafted and readable biography of Archibald Cox. This recommen- dation can be made without regard to the prospective reader's special- ized interests or legal or political philosophy. Cox's most memorable moment in the limelight, and the one with the largest audience, was his October 20, 1973, press conference in which he explained why, in his capacity as Watergate special prosecutor, he was insisting that President Richard M. Nixon produce a limited num- ber of specified White House tape recordings (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Huffington Post
    Vol. XIII Issue 2 Harrison High School February 2009 Inside the Huffington Post The World’s Most Powerful Blog A Husky Herald Exclusive Emily Singer News Editor This past November was marked Another project, called FundRace, (Media Editor), by one of the most important, contro- tracks contributions to presidential and Colin Sterling versial presidential elections in our candidates and offers maps which (Senior Blog Edi- country’s history. Everyone was talking pinpoint contributors by city, neighbor- tor). All four were about Barack Obama and John Mc- hood, and street. wearing jeans – Cain, and who might be better suited to HuffPo was recently named the one of the sev- save our sinking ship of a country. world’s most powerful blog by the fa- eral reasons why With newspapers in a media mous London newspaper, The Guard- they like working frenzy, writing article upon article about ian. Since the website was founded at the Huffington whatever proved to be the “latest con- three years ago, it has grown enor- Post. troversy,” it was easy to get caught up mously and is positioned to continue to Apart from and confused about everything go- grow over the next several years. comfort, the edi- ing on. The monotonous, unbiased, tors agreed that The Huffington staff hard at work. Courtesy of Emily Singer equal-time-for-each-candidate articles A TYPICAL WORK DAY AT HUFFPO flexible hours (they ington Post for ‘concentrated news,’ or tended to get a bit boring as well. can edit and update from home if they news from all of their favorite websites In times like those, opinion arti- Movies have a tendency to portray want) and the constant energy is what merged onto one website.
    [Show full text]