372-IJBCS-Article-Dr Adeduntan Sunday
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dinumma Deponens, Walker 1858 (Erebidae) Is Here to Stay 1James K
Dinumma deponens, Walker 1858 (Erebidae) is here to stay 1James K. Adams, 2Peter Van Zandt, and 3Tom Neal 1Dept. of Natural Sciences, 148 Sequoya Hall, Dalton State College, Dalton, GA 30720 [email protected] 2Birmingham-Southern College, 900 Arkadelphia Road, Birmingham, AL 35254 [email protected] 31705 NW 23rd street, Gainesville, FL 32605 [email protected] On June 15, 2012, a fresh female specimen of Dinumma ALABAMA: Seven specimens from Jefferson Co., collected deponens Walker, 1858 was taken at gas station lights by Peter Van Zandt all from mixed oak hickory forest near (34.893N, 80.26W) in Morganton, Fannin Co., in north disturbed, urban habitats: three specimens from Ruffner Georgia by Paul Dennehy and James Adams (see the Fall (Irondale, 33.514N, 86.859W) -- June 11 (female), July 16 2012 News of the Lepidopterists’ Society, Vol. 54: No. 3, (male, Fig. 2), and July 19 (male); two specimens from page 104). This location is quite rural, along a state high- the Birmingham-Southern College campus (33.514N, way about 100 miles north of Atlanta. The specimen was 86.859W) -- July 16 (male) and August 27 (male); and two identified (by photograph) by Alberto Zilli. This was the male specimens from the Turkey Creek Nature Preserve first record of the species from the United States. The spe- (33.7N, 86.705W), both on September 27. There was an cies’ known range (prior to this record) is “from India across additional specimen photographed in southeastern Lee E. China to Japan, Korea and to Thailand” (Alberto Zilli, Co., at Smiths Station, just to the northwest of Columbus, pers. -
Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest. -
Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs
A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 Abstract For six years between 2003 and 2008, over 100 site visits were made to fifteen chalk grassland and chalk heath sites within the South Downs of Vice-county 14 (East Sussex). This produced a list of 227 bee and wasp species and revealed the comparative frequency of different species, the comparative richness of different sites and provided a basic insight into how many of the species interact with the South Downs at a site and landscape level. The study revealed that, in addition to the character of the semi-natural grasslands present, the bee and wasp fauna is also influenced by the more intensively-managed agricultural landscapes of the Downs, with many species taking advantage of blossoming hedge shrubs, flowery fallow fields, flowery arable field margins, flowering crops such as Rape, plus plants such as buttercups, thistles and dandelions within relatively improved pasture. Some very rare species were encountered, notably the bee Halictus eurygnathus Blüthgen which had not been seen in Britain since 1946. This was eventually recorded at seven sites and was associated with an abundance of Greater Knapweed. The very rare bees Anthophora retusa (Linnaeus) and Andrena niveata Friese were also observed foraging on several dates during their flight periods, providing a better insight into their ecology and conservation requirements. -
Updated Checklist of Vespidae (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) in Iran
J Insect Biodivers Syst 06(1): 27–86 ISSN: 2423-8112 JOURNAL OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY AND SYSTEMATICS Monograph http://jibs.modares.ac.ir http://zoobank.org/References/084E3072-A417-4949-9826-FB78E91A3F61 Updated Checklist of Vespidae (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) in Iran Zahra Rahmani1, Ehsan Rakhshani1* & James Michael Carpenter2 1 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Zabol, P.O. Box 98615-538, I.R. Iran. 2 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA. ABSTRACT. 231 species of the family Vespidae (Hymenoptera, Vespoidea) of Iran, in 55 genera belonging to 4 subfamilies Eumeninae (45 genera, 184 species), Masarinae (5 genera, 24 species), Polistinae (2 genera, 17 species) and Vespinae (3 genera, 6 species) are listed. An overall assessment of the distribution pattern of the vespid species in Iran indicates a complex fauna of different biogeographic regions. 111 species are found in both Eastern and Western Palaearctic regions, while 67 species were found only in the Eastern Palaearctic region. Few species (14 species – 6.1%) of various genera are known as elements of central and western Asian area and their area of distribution is not known in Europe (West Palaearctic) and in the Far East. The species that were found both in the Oriental and Afrotropical Regions comprises 11.7 and 15.6% the Iranian vespid fauna, respectively. Many species (48, 20.8%) are exclusively recorded from Iran and as yet there is no record of Received: these species from other countries. The highest percentage of the vespid 01 January, 2020 species are recorded from Sistan-o Baluchestan (42 species, 18.2%), Alborz (42 Accepted: species, 18.2%), Fars (39 species, 16.9%) and Tehran provinces (38 Species 17 January, 2020 16.5%), representing the fauna of the Southeastern, North- and South Central Published: of the country. -
Colourful Butterfly Wings: Scale Stacks, Iridescence and Sexual Dichromatism of Pieridae Doekele G
158 entomologische berichten 67(5) 2007 Colourful butterfly wings: scale stacks, iridescence and sexual dichromatism of Pieridae Doekele G. Stavenga Hein L. Leertouwer KEY WORDS Coliadinae, Pierinae, scattering, pterins Entomologische Berichten 67 (5): 158-164 The colour of butterflies is determined by the optical properties of their wing scales. The main scale structures, ridges and crossribs, scatter incident light. The scales of pierid butterflies have usually numerous pigmented beads, which absorb light at short wavelengths and enhance light scattering at long wavelengths. Males of many species of the pierid subfamily Coliadinae have ultraviolet-iridescent wings, because the scale ridges are structured into a multilayer reflector. The iridescence is combined with a yellow or orange-brown colouration, causing the common name of the subfamily, the yellows or sulfurs. In the subfamily Pierinae, iridescent wing tips are encountered in the males of most species of the Colotis-group and some species of the tribe Anthocharidini. The wing tips contain pigments absorbing short-wavelength light, resulting in yellow, orange or red colours. Iridescent wings are not found among the Pierini. The different wing colours can be understood from combinations of wavelength-dependent scattering, absorption and iridescence, which are characteristic for the species and sex. Introduction often complex and as yet poorly understood optical phenomena The colour of a butterfly wing depends on the interaction of encountered in lycaenids and papilionids. The Pieridae have light with the material of the wing and its spatial structure. But- two main subfamilies: Coliadinae and Pierinae. Within Pierinae, terfly wings consist of a wing substrate, upon which stacks of the tribes Pierini and Anthocharidini are distinguished, together light-scattering scales are arranged. -
Journal of Threatened Taxa
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Journal of Threatened Taxa 15 February 2019 (Online & Print) Vol. 11 | No. 2 | 13195–13250 PLATINUM 10.11609/jott.2019.11.2.13195-13250 OPEN www.threatenedtaxa.org ACCESS Building evidence for conservation globally MONOGRAPH J TT ISSN 0974-7907 (Online); ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Publisher Host Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society Zoo Outreach Organization www.wild.zooreach.org www.zooreach.org No. 12, Thiruvannamalai Nagar, Saravanampatti - Kalapatti Road, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Ph: +91 9385339863 | www.threatenedtaxa.org Email: [email protected] EDITORS Typesetting Founder & Chief Editor Mr. Arul Jagadish, ZOO, Coimbatore, India Dr. Sanjay Molur Mrs. Radhika, ZOO, Coimbatore, India Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society & Zoo Outreach Organization (ZOO), Mrs. Geetha, ZOO, Coimbatore India 12 Thiruvannamalai Nagar, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Mr. Ravindran, ZOO, Coimbatore India Deputy Chief Editor Fundraising/Communications Dr. Neelesh Dahanukar Mrs. Payal B. Molur, Coimbatore, India Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, Maharashtra, India Editors/Reviewers Managing Editor Subject Editors 2016-2018 Mr. B. Ravichandran, WILD, Coimbatore, India Fungi Associate Editors Dr. B.A. Daniel, ZOO, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Dr. B. Shivaraju, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Ms. Priyanka Iyer, ZOO, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Prof. Richard Kiprono Mibey, Vice Chancellor, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya Dr. Mandar Paingankar, Department of Zoology, Government Science College Gadchiroli, Dr. R.K. Verma, Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur, India Chamorshi Road, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra 442605, India Dr. V.B. Hosagoudar, Bilagi, Bagalkot, India Dr. Ulrike Streicher, Wildlife Veterinarian, Eugene, Oregon, USA Dr. -
Molecular Phylogeny and Systematics of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea): Higher Classification and Biogeography
Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2006? 2006 147? 239275 Original Article PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS OF THE PIERIDAEM. F. BRABY ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 147, 239–275. With 8 figures Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea): higher classification and Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-abstract/147/2/239/2631026 by Harvard Library user on 21 November 2018 biogeography MICHAEL F. BRABY1,2*, ROGER VILA1 and NAOMI E. PIERCE1 1Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2School of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia Received May 2004; accepted for publication October 2005 The systematic relationships of the butterfly family Pieridae are poorly understood. Much of our current under- standing is based primarily on detailed morphological observations made 50–70 years ago. However, the family and its putative four subfamilies and two tribes, have rarely been subjected to rigorous phylogenetic analysis. Here we present results based on an analysis of molecular characters used to reconstruct the phylogeny of the Pieridae in order to infer higher-level classification above the generic level and patterns of historical biogeography. Our sample contained 90 taxa representing 74 genera and six subgenera, or 89% of all genera recognized in the family. Three complementary approaches were -
Mcguire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity
Celebrating the 10th anniversary of the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 26 – 28 September 2014 2 Front Cover: female Megathymus cofaqui slotteni from Levy County, Florida. Collected as a pupa in March, 2014, by Andrew D. Warren. 3 In addition to hosting the combined meetings of the Southern Lepidopterists’ Society and the Association for Tropical Lepidoptera, we are also celebrating the 10-year anniversary of the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity. Since the official opening of the Center in August, 2004, the collection holdings, including immatures, have risen from about 4 million specimens to over 10 million as a result of targeted world-wide field expeditions by staff, students, and donors, including 100 active research associates in addition to an average of 40 public and private donations each year. New advances in molecular genetics, new biogeographic and analytical methods and other research approaches have refined our knowledge of the incredible biodiversity that exists in the more than 20,000 butterfly species and an estimated 245,000 species of moths that have evolved to be such a successful group and also serve as a prominent environmental indicator species. In just 10 years, we have achieved the status of having one of the largest research training centers with extensive educational programs for advanced studies on Lepidoptera. We trust that you will join us in celebrating our accomplishments as we look forward to new challenges and opportunities during the decades ahead. This is an open invitation for you to visit the McGuire Center regularly and continue to help us achieve these goals with your interest, involvement, and support! Sincerely, Dr. -
Similarities and Contrasts in the Local Insect Faunas Associated with Ten Forest Tree Species of New Guinea!
Pacific Science (1996), vol. 50, no. 2: 157-183 © 1996 by University of Hawai'i Press. All rights reserved Similarities and Contrasts in the Local Insect Faunas Associated with Ten Forest Tree Species of New Guinea! YVES BASSET,z,3 G. A. SAMUELSON, 2 AND S. E. MILLER 2 ABSTRACT: Insect faunas associated with 10 tree species growing in a sub montane area in Papua New Guinea are described and compared. In total, 75,000 insects were collected on these trees during the day and night by hand collecting, beating, branch clipping, intercept flight traps, and pyrethrum knock down over a l-yr period. Association of chewing insects with the hosts was in ferred from feeding trials. Characteristics of the fauna associated with each tree species are briefly outlined, with an emphasis on chewing insects. Four subsets of data, of decreasing affinity with the host, were analyzed by canonical corre spondence and cluster analyses: (1) specialist leaf-chewers, (2) proven leaf chewers, (3) all herbivores (including transient leaf-chewers and sap-suckers), and (4) all insects (including nonherbivore categories). Analyses of similarity between tree species were performed using number of either species or in dividuals within insect families. Analyses using number ofindividuals appeared more robust than those using number of species, because transient herbivore species artificially inflated the level of similarity between tree species. Thus, it is recommended that number of individuals be used in analyses of this type, par ticularly when the association of insects with their putative host has not been ascertained. Not unexpectedly, the faunal similarity of tree species increased along the sequence (1)-(2)-(3)-(4). -
Science Journals — AAAS
SCIENCE ADVANCES | RESEARCH ARTICLE EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; Unprecedented reorganization of holocentric exclusive licensee American Association chromosomes provides insights into the enigma of for the Advancement of Science. No claim to lepidopteran chromosome evolution original U.S. Government Jason Hill1,2*, Pasi Rastas3, Emily A. Hornett4,5,6, Ramprasad Neethiraj1, Nathan Clark7, Works. Distributed 8 1 9,10 under a Creative Nathan Morehouse , Maria de la Paz Celorio-Mancera , Jofre Carnicer Cols , Commons Attribution 11 7,12 1 1 13,14 Heinrich Dircksen , Camille Meslin , Naomi Keehnen , Peter Pruisscher , Kristin Sikkink , NonCommercial 9,10 15 1 1,16 17 Maria Vives , Heiko Vogel , Christer Wiklund , Alyssa Woronik , Carol L. Boggs , License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). Sören Nylin1, Christopher W. Wheat1* Chromosome evolution presents an enigma in the mega-diverse Lepidoptera. Most species exhibit constrained chromosome evolution with nearly identical haploid chromosome counts and chromosome-level gene collinearity among species more than 140 million years divergent. However, a few species possess radically inflated chromo- somal counts due to extensive fission and fusion events. To address this enigma of constraint in the face of an Downloaded from exceptional ability to change, we investigated an unprecedented reorganization of the standard lepidopteran chromosome structure in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi). We find that gene content in P. napi has been extensively rearranged in large collinear blocks, which until now have been masked by a haploid chromosome number close to the lepidopteran average. We observe that ancient chromosome ends have been maintained and collinear blocks are enriched for functionally related genes suggesting both a mechanism and a possible role for selection in determining the boundaries of these genome-wide rearrangements. -
African Butterfly News Is Being Circulated a Bit Earlier Than Usual, As I Will Be Away from 25 April to 15 May
MAY 2019 EDITION: ABN 2019 - 3 AFRICAN (MARCH AND APRIL 2019) BUTTERFLY THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA NEWS LATEST NEWS Welcome to May’s newsletter! May’s edition of African Butterfly News is being circulated a bit earlier than usual, as I will be away from 25 April to 15 May. If anyone has any photographs or trip reports from late April, please send them to me ([email protected]) and they will be included in July’s newsletter. While butterfly numbers do seem a little better than last year (refer to BUTTERFLY INDEX), it’s been another tough season with no sightings whatsoever of two of our Critically Endangered species, the Waterberg Copper (Erikssonia edgei) and Brenton Blue (Orachrysops niobe). I have a sense that our night-flying lepidoptera are faring even worse, possibly a result of light pollution, in addition to the other damaging influences. On a more positive note, there have been some good records from KwaZulu-Natal in recent months, such as the Deceptive Diadem (Hypolimnas deceptor deceptor) and Bicoloured Paradise Skipper (Abantis bicolor) from Krantzkloof, Millar’s Buff (Deloneura millari millari) from Fawn Leas and Zulu Buff (Teriomima zuluana) from Manguzi. In addition, a new locality for Atlantic Yellow Skolly (Thestor dicksoni malagas) was found at Jacob’s Bay (refer to REGIONAL ROUNDUP). Caterpillar Rearing Group meeting and workshop The Caterpillar Rearing Group (CRG) and LepSoc Africa held a workshop at Krantzkloof Nature Reserve on Saturday 6 April. Hermann Staude has undertaken a series of talks around South Africa, to promote the CRG and to inform the public about what has been achieved and what it hopes to accomplish in future. -
Ecological Assessment for the Skhemelele Landfill Site
Ecological Assessment for the Skhemelele landfill site Compiled by: Ina Venter Pr.Sci.Nat Botanical Science (400048/08) M.Sc. Botany trading as Kyllinga Consulting 53 Oakley Street, Rayton, 1001 [email protected] In association with Lukas Niemand Pr.Sci.Nat (400095/06) M.Sc. Restoration Ecology / Zoology Pachnoda Consulting 88 Rubida Street, Murryfield x1, Pretoria [email protected] Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Uncertainties and limitations .................................................................................................. 4 2. Site .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Location ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Site description ....................................................................................................................... 4 3. Background information ................................................................................................................. 4 3.1. Vegetation ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Centres of floristic endemism ................................................................................................