, j Inside This Issue -Fall Course Critique Supplement -Final Board of Directors Feature (page 2) , -Review of All The PreSident's Men ;' (page 7) I' ,( -Thompson Finds Summer Em ployment (page 10)
56th Year, No. 23 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON, D.C. Friday, April 9, 1976 CSARSeek Fitzgerald Is Finalist To Take Over 'GTB License In Presidential Search by John Clyde The Committee to Save Alterna tive Radio (CSAR) will fight "the by Wayne Saitta usurpation of WGTB for parochial The Rev. Thomas R. Fitzgerald, SJ, President of Fairfield University is one interests by the University adminis of the three candidates for University President that the Presidential .Search tration for as long .as it takes in the Committee will submit to the Board of Directors next week, a source close to Federal Communications Commis the Committee revealed. sion", by applying for the WGTB Chairman of the Search Committee Fr. Michael Walsh, SJ, would neither confirm nor deny Fitzgerald's selection. The Board will meet this Wednesday wavelength, according to former station manager Ken Sleeman. to choose from among the three candidates, who will be recommended unranked. Sleeman commented that CSAR is one of the most likely candidates. Fitzgerald said in a telephone willing to negotiate with the Univer· Fitzgerald has been president at interview yesterday, "I'm not going sity Administration. However, he Fairfield since the Fall of 1973. added that he is pessimistic that such to deny it. It's common knowledge At Fairfield, Fitzgerald is credited up here on this campus." When asked negotiations would prove fruitful, with improving many of the univer if he would assume the presidency at and that the "only real choice is sity's financial problems and Georgetown if chosen by the Board through the FCC". balancing its budget. A Fairfield of Directors Fitzgerald replied, "As A l?pokesman for the Federal student described the Silver Fox as an things stand now, yes. I like Fairfield Communications Commission re administrator "who likes to have his ported that no applications have very very much and Georgetown has own way." been filed, as of yet, opposing the always been special to me." . When Fitzgerald came to George University's license for the wave Fitzgerald, who was known as town in 1964, as Dean of the length. "The Silver Fox" during his tenure at College, he was influential in forming Georgetown as Dean of the College The Review Board for WGTB the Faculty Senate. 1970 brought and later the University's Academic Search Committee Chairman came under attack by Sleeman for his greatest controversy at George Vice President, was widely considered conducting its hearings behind closed town. As Academic Vice President, Father Michael J. Walsh doors, to be manipulated with no Fitzgerald was forced to deal with mittee (consisting of three members chance for rebuttal. the problem of ROTC accredidation. of the Board of Directors, as well as The Catholic University station After concluding an ROTC agree representatives of the faculty and (WCAU) h'ad considered applying for ment, Fitzgerald came under attack students) has been meeting since last an FM wavelength, to provide a Gage Proposes Plan from certain faculty and students term establishing its own guidelines stronger and clearer broadcast. (including the Student Senate) for and interviewing candidates. WCAU broadcast on an AM frequen overstepping his authority. Fitzgerald The Board of Directors can either cy which reaches only a few dorms then promised to resign if one-fourth choose one of these three or return on the campus. of the Board of Directors did not all to the Search Committee. Likeli WCA U reportedly considered the To ·Ease Parking Ban support his decision. He was upheld. hood of the latter is considered to be WGTB frequency in particular, but The Presidential Search Com· slight, however. Catholic's FM bid was halted by their by Greg Kitsock Prospect Streets. The parking ban Committee chairman again D<"t station members in recent weeks. Student Body President Bob Gage was approved by the DC City week. A spokesman forWCAU said that is pushing a compromise on the Council Transportation Committee The stUdent body preside d said the station is entirely operated by proposed Georgetown non-residential last Thursday, and will go before the he didn't think he. would get the SG Nominates Young Alumni students and added that WGTB's parking ban, which would allow Council within a month. entire area initially requested. "How problems may have been partially students to park in certain blocks Gage added that chairman of the ever, I think we can get a large chunk caused by non-student control. Slee near the University. Georgetown Citizens Transportation of it and I'm goin~ to make sure we To University Board of Directors man, however, claimed that "the If Gage's proposal is approved, Committee John Wagley has been get enough space so everyone who University starved WGTB" and added commuters still will be able to park receptive to his proposal, and that he needs a parking spot will have one," by Wayne Sailla Gage stated that his purpose was Continued on page 3 in the area from 37th to P to 34th to would meet with the Transportation he stressed. Student Body President Bob to "get ayoung alumnus on the board. Gage added that if the compro Gage last week proposed six nomi· Someone involved with student con mise fails, he would oppose parking nees (five of them young George· cerns who would have closer contact restrictions on legal grounds. He town Alumni) to fill vacant spots with the whole campus-a variation noted that a similar parking ban was on the University's Board of Direc in perspective." declared unconstitutional in the case tors. Gage submitted the list to Gage admitted that he sees prob of Whiseman u. The State of Ohio, University President Fr. Henle, who lems in getting these nominees and added that Mayor Washington will in turn propose nominees to the approved and that he doesn't "have a violated procedure by failing to pass members of the University's Corpora great deal of hope of these guys the proposed restrictions from his tion who actually choose new board 'getting on the board." desk to the City Council within the members. The six names submitted alloted thirty days. were: Of the group, only one, Clifford Gage also said he might argue that • James P. Clark (C '70), first Alexander, is not a young alumnus. .: campus students are residents of president of the Unified Student Gage said that he proposed Alexan der, who ran for Mayor of DC, ~ Georgetown and therefore should be Government, and presently an attor o eligible for parking stickers under the ney in Los Angeles. because "he (Alexander) could im· restrictions. • Jack Leslie (SFS '76), presently prove community relations. He < would be like Pat Harris and bridge ~ "I'd like to prove we can work a student, ex·president of the stUdent '" out a program which accomplishes body and student representative on the gap between the community and the University," the president con ~ their aims and ours, to get enough the Presidential Search Committee. tinued. ~ parking space for students," Gage • Rich Burke (SBA '75), aid to ~ said. Senator Edward Kennedy of Massa The nominations were not sub He added that he agreed with the chusetts, ex-resident assistant and mitted to the student senate as committed aims of approving the ex-student government comptroller. provided for by the constitution. ban: to decrease congestion and air • Gary Lanzara (GULe '76), Instead, Gage charged ex·senator Ed pollution. However, he said that it ex-president pro-tempore of the Finneran (SBA '75) with the task of would be impossible for commuting student senate and acting vice drawing up a suitable list of names. GU-GW Food Groups students to move to mass transit by president of the student body. Gage claimed that he was given next year. Area bus lines operate on • Constance Casey O'Donnell only three days to come up with a list a 9 to 5 schedule which is incon (SLL '70). of names and therefore did not have venient for students, Gage said. • Clifford Alexander ( GULC time to gring the matter before the The student body president said '60), active in district affairs, ran for Senate. There has been no objection Form Macke Coalition he would prefer to settle the issue Mayor of Washington, DC in the raised by any senators over Gage's out of court. last election. action. by Mark McAdams area schools serviced by Macke, to rebidding Macke's contract and pian Georgetown and George Washing participate. to work together in evaluating their ton food committee chairmen, Mark Dunton said, "It's hard to fight respective bids. Even if Macke is not Jarmie and Drew Dunton, have Macke on your own. To make sure retained by both schools, Jarmie and formed a coalition to compare food that we're not getting screwed by Dunton say th~y will keep the Law School Students specifications and have united to deal them we have to know what the coalition to keep pressure on all the with the Macke Corporation. They other schools are getting." food services. also plan to ask American and Both George Washington and Jarmie said, "Just the idea of Catholic Universities, the two other Georgetown are in the process of students working together will blast them into serving students the kinds Balk Over SES Cards of things we want." by Greg Kitsock students to pick up tickets for other become a real headache for the Catholic University Student Gov Claiming that first year law students at the SEC office, even people involved because of the Student Development ernment President and Food Com students are misled into paying for when holding several ID and SES hassles with the SEC." mittee member Mike Hall said, entertainment they never receive, the cards. Movies were shown at the Law "Getting together to evaluate on GU Law Center's Student Bar AsSO· SEC chairman Bill Schlosser an Center every Friday afternoon last food services is definitely a good ciation has asked that Student swered the charge, saying, "The year but were discontinued this year Investigates Fraternity idea. From a practical viewpoint, Entertainment Subscription (SES) problem is not the cards, it's the lack because of poor ~ttendance, ac· Macke is the best food service we've cards be removed from GULC fall of help. We'd love to do a feasible· cording to SEC sources. The Paper by Pa t Dinardo deliberations of the said tasl, force." had in the last five years. They're not registration packets. The proposal, program at the Law Center, but we Chase, recently borrowed from SEC, Because of numerous complaints According to Dr. Patricia Rueckel, great, however, and seem to be get however, also invites the SEC to sell can't extend our facilities without reportedly drew a crowd of 750 for and questions, the University has vice.president for student develop ting worse. Our contract with Macke cards at the Law Center during fall volunteer help from them." Schlosser three showings. . established a Task Force specifically ment, the main purpose of the Task is being renegotiated but we're not registration. added that the SEC can't afford to Student Activities Director Jeff Fogelson said he saw no reason why to investigate certain aspects of the Force is "to define the relationship. opening bids to others. In general According to a proposal drafted run ads in the student newspapers Delta Phi Epsilon Fraternity and its that exists between Delta Phi Epsilon students don't want to rebid." by SBA president Julianna Zekan regularly, noting that the full·page the SEA should be prevented from relationship to the University. The and the University." She conceded American University Food Com and Thaddeus Bejnar, first year ads for Arms' and the Man in the last deleting the SES cards. However, he guidelines of the Task Force acknow that a number of complaints have mittee members were not available students don't realize that most SEC two issues of The HOY A were "the added that law students might be ledge that "although Delta Phi been received regarding the frater for comment. sponsored events are held at the main first run in a long time." "spiting themselves by doing this." Epsilon is not formally recognized by nity's pledging practices, but empha Dunton said, "Macke told your campus. "I don't think they can offer or legally connected to the Univer sized that "the investigation is not a committee that the reason they were The SEC chairman said that it entertainment at the Law Center in sity, it is clear that there is a witch·hunt; it clearly is not out to sent out to bid at GW was because The SEC offers to incoming law always has been SEC policy to any way approaching what the SEC perceived relationship by certain get anyone." they were having trouble with your students during the summer discount require every ticket buyer to appear does. It's not SEC's fault that they're members of the local community, Conry maintains that the fraternity student government. I happen to cards for SEC events at $6 per personally at the box office. He centered here and the Law Center is numerous students, and some faculty "stands proud" of its membership know that that is absolutely untrue. semester and $11 per year. Although denied that GULC students used to a distance away." and staff of the School of Foreign procedures. He said, "The procedures We get lied to by the University and the advertisem,ents state that most be exempt from this policy, as Fogelson added that the SEC Service." involve none of the arbitrary, caprici Macke. We've got to keep in touch to events take place on the main charged in a recent article in the might solve the ticket problem by Kevin Conry, President of Delta ous high·jinks of some social fraterni make sure the're not telling one campus, Zekan complained that first Georgetown Law Weekly, noting that selling tickets at the Law center for Phi Epsilon, agrees that the frater ties that have often been criticized." university one thing and us another." year students don't realize that 37th. exceptions were made only for the two or three hours a week. nity's membership cuts across all The Task Force is composed of Jarmie said that there are a and 0 is across town from the law Bruce Springsteen concert. Law student Vincent DeAngelo, phases of the GU community, but he six members: Director of Student number of limitations to the coali· campus. "I think it takes advantage However, according to SBA Secre who worked with SEC last year, said asserts: "Delta Phi Epsilon is an Activities Jeff Fogelson, who will tion. "We have different program of people coming here," she said. tary Thaddeus Bejnar, Zekan was the SEC had considered his proposal ind,ependent entity, owning its own direct the Task Force; two faculty specifications so at times it's like Zekan estimated that 100 cards were told at the beginning of the year that to sell tickets at GULC, but never house and not receiving money from appointees: Roy Godson and comparing apples to oranges." But, sold to law stUdents this year for a law students would be' allowed to toolc action. "Right now we get very the University." Conry stated how· Dorothy BetZj two Student Govern he said that working with GW has total of over $900. pick up tickets for others. Bejnar little service out of SEC because of a ever, that the fraternity intends to ment representatives: Leo Madden resulted in a number of changes in The SBA also criticized the SEC further charged, "We've had commit combination of circumstances. How cooperate with the Task' Force but and Timothy Fitzgibbons; and an Georgetown's food specifications for not advertising on the law school tee chairmen who spent many hours ever, if the SBA is willing to work held that "the fraternity needs to appointee to be named by Dean such as serving manditory yogurt and campus, not holding any events at on the main campus trying to arrange with SEC, they could get a lot have a full, proper role in all Krogh of the Foreign Service School. frozen yogurt along with ice cream. the Law Center, and not allowing law movies for the Law Center. It's done," he said. ',j Page 2 The HOYA Friday, April 9, 1976 Not Close\ Enough for Comfort?, by Ed Rogozinski to grapple with the information controversy on campus arising from representatives, and alumni repre is sent out· by \, the University's dent's office or the Schoofltp.~ltiuri~ It is a common complaint that problem." the conflict between Father Henle sentatives were now allowed to sit administration. HO'\i'ever, "All of the .to. His second source of information members of Georgetown's Board of When the Board was completely and Father Ryan until Henle fired in on Board meetings. Therefore, infonnation I receiv~. is not through is' the .Board's Special ..Cominittees. Directors leave their jobs, jet in to made up of Jesuits, it was in Ryan. The Ryan affair marle Board there has. been an increased amount the administration," Pellegrino These Committees' get :. th~fr ·.own Washington, D.C., . decide the future extremely close contact with the members realize that there was a of input from various members of. maintained.~'Students give me a lot· information. Father.. O'·Keefe said of the University, and jet back home. University. However, it was a closed great deal of infonnation that they the University community over· the of infonnation. I have even received " that the $tudent Lif~;Comrnjttee~ However, Board Members contend board with a regimented system and were not getting but ought to be last two years. personal letters from students,1'he which he had previouslybeEm on'; differently. predictable policy. The Board was getting. "The Ryan affair shook the Ralston stated that stUdents added...... met with students and RA's'and that very knowledgeable about the Uni Board up. It made them realize that pioneered meeting with Board com . Pellegrino stated that he has been every committee operates c' 'in; the Historical Perspective versity itself, but not open to they didn't know much of what was mittees last ·year. He feels that, "the on at least half a dozen other boards same way. He commerited;,."!irhis Up until 1968, the Board of students. going on in the University," Ralston situation has shown a marked im and that, on the. average, he gets committee system bypasses.tI:te Presi Directors was composed entirely of Now that the Board is an external said. provement-as evidenced by the "more information from Georgetown dent's Office and is a direct source of Jesuits. Therefore, the present com board, the problem of keeping in After the Ryan controversy, the recent creation of the Main Campus than the others." information from whomever the position of the Board is relatively close contact with the :University has Board opened up its meetings. Peop.1e Affairs Committee." However, one Board member, members of the committees want." new-eight years old. According to arisen. The event which epitomized involved with the University who had ObserverS of the Board have who· wished to remain nameless,' Chairman of the Finance Com ex-Student Bodv President Dave the fact tl1at the Board was not as previously been prohibited from pOinted out that some members are disagrees with these views. "I do not mitteeGeorgeScharffenberger, who . Ralston, who haS dealt frequently informed as it should be was the attending the meetings-administra not on committees which receive a feel that there is an adequate amount is a major" officer in two corpora with the Board, "Because the Board Ryan affair. The Board was not tive officers of the University, the great deal of student input. There of information," he stated, "at least tions, said that the financial informa~ is so young, they are just beginning aware of the fact that there was a President of the Faculty Senate, fore, these members do not come in to all members. I have a feeling that tion package he receive~ .froin close contact with students. How some members receive more informa Georgetown rates favorably .to.the ever, Board Members contend that tion than others." financial packages he receives from those who are in a position to receive The member said that the infor the two corporations he's. involved student· input do take advantage of mation .he receives "tends to be wtth. . . . their position and are wen aware of organized toward the agenda of the Scharffenberger reiterated' . that student opinions. meetings." He also receives informa the Board meetings are now attended According to these observers, "If tion prior to the budget meeting. by a cross-section of people from the you are a student and want to get The member commented that he University. "This was missing up something passed by the Board, in a does not even receive the campus. unti1a few years ago," he stated. sense you have to find an advocate newspapers and only from time to Scharffenberger' has ."been. on among the members. You have to time does he receive University many boards." He feels, "Generally; strike a note with a member who will publications, but "on decisions I've a director will get out in tennso! speak for you when the Board goes been called on to make adequate information what he seeks .. , At into discussion. But, traditionally, information has been given regar.ding Georgetown, a member cang~tall boards don't have this type of the decisions." He said that publica the.information he seeks;" . member." tions such as the campus papers, In response to charges that the though not directly pertinent to the Boosters or Directors? Board of Directors is not well Board's decisions, "give you a . informed, board member Dr. background, a feeling, to what is One Board member expressed Edmund D. Pellegrino replied, "This happening at the University. anger over the conduct .of his is not a proper charge." The member. feels that there colleagues. "Lay people on the Board After Committee meetings, Pelle· should be an improvement in the tend to operate in a curious way," he grino has dinner with administrators, amount, kind, and regularity in the stated. "Some members don't 'seem .~ faculty and students from the Med information the Board receives, to understand what their proper o Center. He frequently meets with "Substantial improvements have mode of behavior should be." These .<: Chancellor of the Medical Center members, he contends, don't objec· .2 been made," he said, "but we have a ~ Matthew McNulty, long way to go." As an example the tively view the situation of the » In regard to normal Board in· member said that he did not even university-and this lack of objec· .0 formation, Pellogrino said, "It's have any idea as to the tenure rates tivity is harmful. "I don't think that remarkable how much they send us." of University professors. their role is to say that everything at He receives "virtually all of the Father Martin D. O'Keefe, SJ, a the university is perfect." University's publications" and is member of the Presidential Search This member views the Board as University Board of Directors "freely invited" to attend University Committee, said that his information being very much like a' public functions. Prepar~tions for the comes from, baSically two sources: representative body," It should re Join The HOYA Staff Now meetings are sent out "in advance," routine or ordinary business-such as present the outside public--as well as concerning the meeting's agenda. approving proposals or curriculum students, faculty and administra With the semester coming to a close, we're starting to put our Most of the information received changes-comes through the Presi· tors." forces ·together for the fall. We need writers, layout people, photographers and ad people, Stop by our Copley Basement offices. "You Will Meet a • • •" Editor's note: There are many darl, inside. I guess that was to hide never be a nun, and you will live TYPING WANTED 'palmists (they're not what you the dust. until you eventually die." Term Paper, Thesis, think-they're palm readers) in the A woman came into the room and I resolved that .we were finally Manuscripts, etc. DC area. Almost all of them' have said her name was Madam Sophia. I getting some place. For my last call 578-3021 . evenings spiritual names-Madame Fatin:w, had no trouble hearing her approach question, I asked i.f I would fulfill the Sistel' . Rozalia, .'Rev> MotMr' Edna, aS'the . 42: pt)uuds of jew~lry 'Clanged career that-i"1nn' studyihg for now. alld Sisie'r'Savita-""just to 'ttame·a few,: together as she walked: Aftershefinishedlaugho!ng, she'said
.. , "'-',',>-, - .. , " ...... ·A,_'·._..,....· '·1"""' ','--~-' IIl,prder.to ferr..et .. QLl;t;.J4e truth a bqJi,tw" '. She wa., . wearing a (on of make-.. "~' .j. f':1;'_"~-'-~'! ; that ,this questiQAllIDusunbe answered these alleged "dens of iniquity," a up, the natural look, and a long from my palm. ;. I' "'-HOTL1NE HOYA staff writer had her palm read peasant·style dress that seemed three So I put my hand out. Her twice and survived to write the sizes too large. Of course she was eyesight must have been remarkable following article. extremely buxom (a pre·requisite to as she read my palm in the dark from Do you need b:y Gail Pi/hin tOil being a palm reader). across the room, I consider myself to be a normal, She greeted me and told me to She remarked that I was ex· • information? average individual. But all of us follow her-my first mistake. We periencing emotional stress from normal, average individuals occasion- entered a room with one table, two school and that I would eventually • a ride or riders? ally seek out the "weird"; it's the chairs and a crystal ball-great decor change my major from Russian to to know what's going on, on and off only normal thing to do! In keeping for low-income housing. underwater basket weaving. • with this philosophy, I ... I did it .She asked me what I wanted to At this point I wanted my campus? ... I confess ... I went to a palm know and then asked me for five mother, my teddy, and especially my reader! dollars. Having given this some five dollars back, I noticed that she legallmedicall psychological referral? I won't say that this experience previous thought, I asked about my had not stopped smiling all the time • changed my life, so I won't. I future regarding marriage. I began to (never trust people who smile all the remember walking into this old wonder, when she started stroking time). • just someone to talk to? house. I thought that I had come to a the crystal ball. She was obviously I considered myself lucky to be garage sale: the room was slightly having a good time, so why was I alive and told her that that was all WE CAN HELP-WE'RE AS CLOSE AS cluttered to say the least. It was very sitting there like an idiot? the information that I could possibly YOUR PHONE Finally, she gave me one of those handle in one day. I left muttering, White House reasonable answers like, "You will "Who am I? ... Is there any reason in Correspondent marry Rock Hudson and have 36 this world? .. , Where is Nixon now? 337-2646 children (34 girls, 1 boy and 1 Francis lewine in-between)." I was totally thrilled as The five dollars for three ques· will speak on I began to plot how to get my five tions led to $500 worth of psy· dollars back. chiatric bills. So if you are ever. "Covering the President" Then I as],ed her if she saw wondering ... want to know the anything unusual in my life. She future ... or just want to blow five 8:30 Thursday Night replied with astonishingly unusual dollars ... remember: a confession replies like "You will cut your hair from the hand is worth $505 from 105 Healy Bayou numerous times in your life, you witI the pocket. Are you interested in Through Saturday will be going to LAW SCHOOL? Announcing: H o/stra Law School's Bux Pre-Law Summer Training Institute formerly Daddy Warbux HOFSTRA LAW SCHOOL will offer a "Pre-Law Summer Training Capitol Recording Artists) Institute" for six weeks from June 8-July 15. Taught by Professor Stuart Rabinowitz of the Hofstra Law School faculty, the Institute will help you develop the analytical skills and advocacy techniques neces sary for the successful completion oflaw school. The curriculum will include ca:se analysis taught with the traditional Socratic Method, 11tb: CliDlbadonkey legal research and writing, and advocacy techniques and methods of (in the tradition of Polo) taking law school examinations. A Certificate of Successful Completion will be awarded at the end ofthe course. Minimum Requirements for Admission Applicants must have successfully completed two years of college. 13tb-18tb Cberry SDlBSb If you plan to attend Law School, get ajump on your fellow students by requesting an application. Write Pre-Law Summer Training Institute, Hofstra Law School, Hempstead, New York 11550, HOD Srt1O A 20tb-24th Face Dancer or call (516) 560-3636. ~ ~ ••~ (one week only) UNIVERSITY AIR-CONDITIONED DORM SPACE AVAILABLE. .Friday, AprilS, 1976 The HOYAPage 3 Student Gov't Status Poll Shows Remains In: CO'ntention' .DC Residents by MargaretBenry said that he also had understood that In Favor Of Though signing a summary . of there would be a "one or two present undergraduate stUdent polio sentence, recognition of Student cy, University President the Rev. Government" written into the cOln Gun Control Robert J. Henle, SJ failed to recog· l?ilation that Henle w.ould sign. 'nize either student government's . District residents would support . constitution or student government bills to control the sale of handguns, itself. Hankey commented, "If Father the decriminalization of marijuana "1 couldn't recognize Student Henle reneges on his agreement to and. lowering the age of legal Government because then I would recognize student government, he is adulthood to 18, according to the have to recognize the student consti· committing a breach of faith and is Georgetown University Poll conduc· tution, and student influence on threatening relations. This is very ted by Dr. Robert Hitlin of the administration is, adviSOry. But I do serious." Government Department. Highest not ignore students. I regularly The points mentioned in the support for such legislation came consult them," Henle commented. Codification of Students' Rights and from males, liberals, the highly edu Student Rights Committee Chair· Responsibilities have all been ap Professor Robert Hitlin cated, whites and high-income man Dave Hankey (SFS '78) ac· proved before, according to Gage. groups. When asked if they sup· knowledged that the student consti· Gage said, "I just want him (Father HoyaSelected ported a bill to control handguns, 69 tution would not be recognized. Henle) to recognize this approval. He percent of the 830 persons polled "Henle says that it grants too many won't be signing anything into said they agreed. Fifteen percent powers not there and it's ambi· policy. The things present in the GOP Alternate were opposed and 16 percent were guous-and this is true." compilation are already University not sure. However, Hankey claimed, policy." To Convention "In last year's poll we used "During' Ralston's administration Father Herile said that he will sign slightly different wording to ask by Margaret Henry . Henle said that there would be no the compilation "with the proviso about gun control, so the results are problem in dejure recognition of that it derives its authority not from Mark Ellsworth (C '77) is an not strictly comparable," said Hitlin. alternate delegate to the Republi· St\.ident Government as an arbiter for my signature but from the bodies "But in both instances the public was GU students." Henle said, "I never that it concerns. Any changes to be can National Convention after strongly in favor of some sort of gun said that, or if I did say it, I didn't made must come from those bodies beating three opponents in the control." March 27 race in the fifth district Law States Alban Towers mean it that way. But I don't think I themselves." , For the other two questions, 44 ' of New JeJ;Sey. said that." Henle reiterated that Father Henle said that the com· percent of those polled supported there will be no recognition of the pilation would be signed "as soon as He said, "I feel my election reflects a positive attitude on the the decriminalization of marijuana; student constitution in the compila· it's convenient for Bob (Gage) and 37 percent were opposed and 19 .Must Accept All Comers tion that he signs and that there will me. It's a question of scheduling." part of t~e Republican party to percent were not sure. Fifty percent be "no official recognition' of student The Student President corn· involve young Republicans in the . GU students applying for rooms advertising to students and by urging decision-making process." Ells· of those asked favored lowering the government. " mented, "Tomorrow is convenient age of the legal adulthood to 18; 33 in Alban towers wiII continue to students to pay security deposits and Student Body President Bob Gage for me." worth's opponents in the fifth compete with non·Georgetown appli· sign leases for rooms as soon as they district included a councilman, a percent were opposed and 10 percent cants following the University's fail· are available. . Republican club chairman and a were not sure. ure to find a way to grant the Salyards added that an .Open committeewoman. According to Hitlin's poll opin· ·building dormitory status. House at Alban Towers will be held Catholic Drops Plan Ellsworth commented on the '76 ions on these social issues show Associate . Dean of Students 'from 2 to 5 p.m. on April 11 for all election, "The New Jersey delega similar patterns of support among William Schuerman said that the GU students looking for a place to tion is uncommitted but my pre· various population groups, though University had conferred with live. ference at this time is Ford. I think the overall levels of support differ lawyers about limiting residence to Of 624 tehants now living at ToOperate90.1 FM he has restored confidence in the slightly. On these issues, women, GU students and personnel, but was Alban'Towers, about 480 are GU presidency. low-income groups, low-education :informed that such a move would ' stUdents, faculty or staff. About 75 (continued from page 1) University. "Sen. Howard Baker of Tennes· groups, conservatives and blacks are violate District law. Alban Towers is students from American, Catholic that the lack' of sal.aried personnel CSAR, Sleeman added, is "finish see will be Ford's running mate and more socially conservative than their licensed and zoned a.s an apartment and George Washington live in the prevented WGTB from reaching high· p.d fooling around with the adminis· the Democratic ticket will list counterparts. hotel, and under District law no housing complex, and 19 apartments er journalistic standards." tration". Along with the license, Humphrey as presidential nominee In the survey, the pollsters inter room applicant may be turned away still .are occupied by tenants who Sleeman is presently chief engi. confrontation at the FCC, CSAR and Carter or Kennedy as his viewed 830 DC residents, ages 18 or if vacancies are available. moved in before the University neer at WPFW·FM which is seeking plans to publicize its objectives running mate," the government older at random by telephone from . According to Director of Invest· bought the property. an alternative fonnat. He doubted through the mediums of radiO, major continued. February 23-29. This sample size is 'ment property Kenneth Salyards, the Rent for the apartments, which that the establishment of an alterna· television and benefit concerts. Slee. Ellsworth said that Thomas designed to insure accuracy to within University fears that Glover Park and now ranges from $245 to $510 a tive station at WPFW would diminish man encouraged Georgetown'students Kean, New Jersey assembly minori· 2 to 2.5 percent of the survey Cathedral Avenue citizens groups month, will increase by 5 per cent CSAR's committment to an alterna· to "look into what's happening." ty leader, encouraged him to run on findings. would' file suit if residence' in Alban starting next September 1, Salyards tive format at WGTB. Instead, The William Notley Education a youth involvement platform. Telephone numbers for the -Towers were denied to non·GU said. He cited as reasons for the rate Sleeman said that another alternative Foundation, .of w:hich Sleeman has Ellsworth worked as an aid to Kean sample were randomly generated to ,applicants: Salyards noted that the hike "skyrocketing utilities" and an station "freed from parochial reo been a director, had in the past during the summers of '74 and '75. be certain to include unlisted tele· . University compensates for this by increase in sewage and water rates in straint would encourage WGTB to considered intervening in the various Ellsworth's other experience in· phone numbers and newly connected the District as of May 1. seek higher journalistic standards." controversies tliat have enveloped c1udes chairing the College Republi. numbers. Tabulation of the response.s Salyards noted that the University CSAR, according to Sleeman, is a WGTB in the past few years. cans at Georgetown and working as was done at the Georgetown Compu· Vivitar TX Zoom lens has made extensive improvements in "community based group dedicated However, the Notley Foundation an aid in the office of Millicent tation Center. The demographic 70-260mm inol. MT & Case Alban Towers' since its purchase, to the philosophy of community disassociated itself with WGTB be. Fenwick, New Jersey congress· characteristics of the respondents $200 ' including the remodeling of many acess. A spokesman at CSAR said cause of a conflict of interests, in woman. have been adjusted. in order to match Call 269-2353 rooms and the, installation of smoke that WGTB had responsibilities to that three of the four directors of the Ellsworth said that he will write the race, sex and age distributions of Ask fo~, N;~ncy detectors and 'an alarm system on all tl),e general community and sh.ouldn't Notley· Foundation have been'star..: a paper on his experiences at the the"District of Columbia as reported exits. serve merely as a spokesman for the fers'ofWGTB.· . National Convention. ". by thtltlS Census Bureau. Planning Summer Study? Pre;'Registration April 8-14 with your Dean, School Adviso:r, . or ~epartmental Advisor
Summer Sessions on Campus • Pre-Session: May 24 - June 11 • First Session: June 14 - July 17 • CroHs Session: June 21 - various • Second Session: July 19 - August 20 • Mini-Session: August 30 - September 2
Programs Abroad: See Program Director to apply • International Relations: Vienna. Austria Director, Dr. Stanislaw Wasowski • International Relations: Vienna, Austria Director, Dr. Stanislaw Wasowski • Spanish: Quito, Ecuador Director, Dr. David Suarez • French: Dijon, France Director, Dr. Pierre Maubrey • German: Trier. West Germany Directors, .. . Undergraduate: Rev. Joseph Zrinyi, S.J. Graduate: Dr. Kurt Jankowsky
Changes, Additions, and Deletions in Catalogue CANCELLED: 954-739-01 Workshop in Generative Syntax, Prof. Napoli FACULTY CHANGES: Math 001, Mary Jane Centola Math 003, Arnold Stokes Math 005, Giorgio Gnugnoli Math 031, Raymond Geremia Math 032, Andrew Vogt Math 038, John Baillieul ADDmONS: 033-8OO{)1 Economic Model Building Seminar; 3 cr., $264; (Session 3: JWle 21-Aug 1~ 1976J; Time-TEA: Prof. David .Walker (students must complete permiSSion form and register b JWle 14 through SSCE) TIME CHANGES: 866-150/152'{)1 Design of Nursing Systems, M-F 8:00-11:00 a.In. . 866-151/153{)1 Self-Care Requirements; Systems of Self Gare, (Session 3: 6/21-7/30), 11:00 a.m, lZ:30p.m. 866-150/152..Ql Design of Nursing Systems, M-F 8;()()"l1:OO a.m. ';': Page 4 The HOY A Friday, April 9, 1976 \. editoliQls & columns ,1 \.,. Having Money To Blow
Dean of Students Dr. Patricia Rueckel's dates for the series of foreign affairs speakers recent decision to investigate the local chapter the fraternity sponsors, thi,s would be a greater of the· foreign s'ervice fraternity, Dt:lta Phi loss for the students than for the fraternity., Epsilon, is a blatant example of the distorted Certainly it would not kill a grol;lp that has table of priorities which characterizes the lasted 56 years and has included deans, faculty University administration, the Student and students over the years. Development Staff, in particular. Dr. RueckeI.s office has no more jurisdic~ The convening of the investigative panel is !ion over the fraternity than Delta Phi Epsilon· indefensible; no justification, except pursuing has over Student Development. The fraternity vendetta, can be deferred for such a total >yaste . probably has as good a service record, for its of resources. size, as Student Development or Residence The fraternity has no connection with the Life. University, other than an imaginary "perceived Don't the administrators, faculty . and relationship." The' fraternity owns its house; it students have better things to spend their time. receives no money from the University. Even if on than such a fruitless and purposeless Student Development's Kangaroo Court venture?' If the Student Development Staff decided that Delta Phi Epsilon ranked as draws a salary (from tuition, of course) only to reprehensible a crew as the Ku Klux Klan, the dream up this sort of boondoggle, then it is only real action it could take would be to ban time to show a few people better ways to while posters advertising frat events from campus. away the hours-with someone else footing the Since the majority of such flyers announce bill. Zero-based budgeting, anyorte?
United We Stand Perceiving Relationships Earlier this week in a surprise move the up until these present more successful times. University Food Committee formed a coalition However, if there is one thing that has been with their counterparts at George Washington proven by our own food committee's struggle, University to form a common front to deal it is that singular action is not enough. Food When AU Else Fails: liN" with Macke, or whatever other Food Service is companies and universities are an awesome around next semester. They hope to have array of resources. To be effective we must Certain administrative authorities is why the educational value of times only the fear of administrative Catholic and American University also join the of the various schools have made writing papers suddenly disappears inconvenience. The safeguard in the . present a united front to bring our combined pUblic over the last few months their on or about May 7th. That is the last system I'm proposing, is absolute: alliance. strength to bear on food companies. view that too many "N" grades are day of the examination period, the unless a student and a professor The plan makes eminent good sense. Macke being requested by and given to last day on which term papers and agree, there will be no "N" grade. has an uncontested control over the Washing That is not to say that all the schools in the students. This is an unfortunate Why do Dean's offices have a voice in area must choose the same food company. This· position. the gradj~g procedure anyway? ton college market. Four of the di~trict's major is not necessary. What is required is that the An . "N" represents an agreement mQkin9~Enemies Granted: these arguments do not ,universItIes are served by Macke. While between professor and student to the apply to examinations, which are opinions of Macke relative to other food students of the area schools pool their effect that all of the student's . viewed more as a necessary evaluative companies vary all the schools agreed that the information so everyone knows what is required work need not be com Steve mathias evil than as a solid educational pleted before the scheduled end of exercise, and, thus, are prone. to quality of Macke's sel'vice has been declining. possible and who offers the best deal. It is important that if we d6n't have the same the semester, but by an agreed, later the like will be accepted in the abuse, leading to unfair comparisons We have faced in recent years not only date, All accede to the use of the absence of an "N" grade. On May between students. In addition, there deteriorating service but also rising rates. While companies that all the sc,hools agree and insist gt'ade in the' event of serious illness or 8th, a paper which would' have is the possibility that some students such a situation is in line with the history and upon certain minimum sfandards and condi other incapacitation, but many see merited an "A" and good comments will view "N" grades as tickets to an tions and that .. all schools, render w,hate.ver no other valid function. It is the a day before, now gets handed back effortless semester, trading present traditions of the University, it is not one that burden' ofthiscolumn' to develop:'an .unread. Do not, disturb: professibnal satisfaction for,' future sweat; but support nec~ssary,to any of the ~ch.oql~ J?~e,c.l ~ can or should be tolerated. , alternative viewpoint. .. . educators at work. don't gamble that most students ~~-""~'T11e foodcomnliftee' '}i3.s'""at'feinp'tea-Tiirgery ,withser.vice below those standards. . ',< ,. I am here to be educated. I fully There's no question but that you would rather. write papers over, the accept the .idea that writing papers can devote more serrious attention to Christmas holidays and the summer in vain to improve the meals at Georgetown With combined strength we can reverse the has an educational value-it sharpens a subject when it is the only thing on vacation than during the school year. from its earliest days, when it was little more food committee's long history of defeats, research and formulation skills, your mind and you are' working T~e crucial notion is that a than a collection of bought and paid for hacks, frustration and impotence. broadens horizons, adds depth and' under a relaxed schedule than when student should 'not be required to balance to the learning process, and you are simultaneously taking final present for his professor's considera· much more. What I don't understand exams, moving out of the dormitory, tion a paper that he knows is not his and speeding. And absolutely none best work. An "N" gt'ade in no way of the benefits to be derived from penalizes those who allocate their writing a term paper is in any way time sufficiently well during the dependent on. the condition that it semester that they avoid either be handed in by May 7th. We seem last-hour pyrotechnics or. inferior to be trying to balance the potential papers: when May 7th comes, these advantages of further serious con go on well-deserved vacation. My sideration and the production of view is that the capricious denial of work in which a student can take an "N" grade should not penalize pride against no apparen t disadvan those who feel that added time and tages; all I read about is administra the effort it allows could result in a tors-not academics-talking about more beneficial educational experi crackdowns. The "dangers" they cite ence. Perhaps herein lies the. com are either imprable or not really promise between the ever-shrinking dangerous and one senses that their semester and' the rising student problem with "N" grades is some- demand for a reduced course load. Editor's Note: This week The HOYA (as by now you've surely noticed) is attempting a major change in its layout. We decided to change to the larger size pages because we felt that such a The Sexist Rip Off format was more in keeping with our concept of what a campus newspaper should bring to the student body. We 'are eagerly seeking student response. If it is negative, next semester, the old Welfare is a women's issue. The household heads. As of 1972, 15 shrinks the amount women have HOYA will be back. If, however, it is positive, the new style is here to stay. Drop by our Copley large number of female-headed million of American families or 2'2 coming to tliem. Private pension Basement offices or drop us a line in campus mail. But, definitelY,let us know what you think. households living near or below the percent were headed by women. This plans similarly discriminate against poverty line prove it. Mothers who rise can be attributed to the divorce women. They often require several don't have husbands to support them rate, which has dOUbled since' 1960, years of continuous employment, so that they can care for their and the longer life span of women. which women may not be able to children properly and the elderly Women eam less than men; their give. women who struggle to make ends median income is only about 63 per The current economic crisis has meet on grossly inadequate Social cent of men's. Also, they are severely affected women. In regard Security payments often have to go disporportionately employed in low to job cutbacks, the rule has been on welfare in order to survive. There paying jobs. The result is that a "last hired, first fired." Since women are several myths about welfare greater percentage of families with tend' to be more recent entrants or THE BOARD OF EDITORS recipien ts, most of whom female breadwinners are poor. re·entrants into the labor force, they ALLEGEDLY "rip off" the govern. Women's participation in the have less seniority. Therefore, they Jim Colaprico, Editor,in,Chief ment by choosing not to work when labor force is characterized by are more likely to be laid off. While Wayne Saitta, News Editor Lou DeMille, Sports Editor Lou Anne Bulik, Production Manager they are perfectly able to . These they may have suffered only slightly Mark McAdams, Assistant New~ Editor Rod Kuckro, Arts Editor . John Martorana, Ad Manager women do not fit into these more than men employed by indivi Ed Rogozinski, Assistant Features Editor Ken Brown, Photography Editor , Harriet Louros, Office Manager stereotypes, Most welfare recipients Caucusing dual companies or state and local Bob Labriola, Assistant Sports Editor Greg Kitsock, Copy Editor Rev. Edward Bodnar, S.l •. Moderator don't. governments, the cumUlative effect Jack Shea, ASl{ociate Editor Why have these women been of these layo,ffs nationally could be forced to seek public assistance? Lynn Snowbet substantial. Unemployment compen Many of them have turned to welfare' sation is also based on the earnings of ContributingEditors as a last resort. Alimony or child instability and less upward mobility. the recipient when employed. Ann LoLordo, Steve F~iedman, Jay Rosellstein, Sylvan Sobel, P. T. Lucchesi support checks stopped coming in Since women are still relegated to the Women who have a difficult time (or never arrived in the first place), lowest paying and unskilled jobs, living on their low salaries are News Staff Production The cost of living spiralled and their they have a higher turnover rate. entitled to subsistence benefits. Mike Bradley, John Clyde, Cary Fulbright, Joane Grourke, Mary Schlicl
--.... ~~ letters . ..G.. · T·...· ..·.B for the upgrading of· the. entire watched the first half of the petent member of your staff to cover students. This is no individual pro· body. Its primary concern is with a W ~ security system in the Georgetown Macaroni & Cheese-George's Balls the event. test. This is clear from the volume of successful publishing house. (I say To tlie Editor: .; . dorms. Not only the student guards contest with Mr. Labriola, it was G. McCarrick letters being written, petitions being this even though that phrase is ,As'a-Georgetown senior I write. b:ut the whole security department quite evident that his, personal (and B '78 circulated and flyers being posted. In beginning to sound like a cliche). I . this.le.tter with that small part of rieeds to take a more serioUs attitude perhaps his financial) interests were Editor's Note: A check with Dale the face of such overwhelming fail to comprehend how Dr. O'Brien myselt:which is.Dot inundated with. toward student. protection in the influencing his neutiality in viewing Parrish (C'77) will indeed clear up student reaction to this decision could have made such a statement. : dis,appointlhent. I believe that the dorms; Furthermore, we'too believe and reporting the game. Before the the situation; although the findings supportive of Dr. Hitlin, Dr. I can only hope that tho~ abrupt closing of. WGTB represents a Residence Life should take a larger game started, Mr. Labriola made the will hinder rather than support this O'Brien's statement that student responsible for deciding Dr. Hitlin's clear- failure on the part of the share of the responsibility for the point' to address Macaroni & Cheese case: Hypothetically, whether money protest can do nothing is, as I future will reconsider what I consider . University to come to terms with an incidents reported. and instruct·· them . to run up . the was bet on the game or not does not interpret it, tantamount to a blatant a rash decision in the light of what Is obviously conflicting situation. This . Alme Linton score. As heard, straight 'from the justify a referee (an individual being admission that this University depart. best for their students. happens to' be the only station in Betli M. Berkowski horse's mouth, there was the matter paid for impartial judgment) taking ment refuses to consider in its Susan Stabile Washington where all perspectives are . of a forty point spread and Ii few matters into his own hands and decisions the welfare of the student C '79 openly manifested-an extension of dollars on· the line. Deny it, Mr. determining the final outcome of the what'. should. lie the pedagogical Hitlin Labriola. We could always ask Dale game. function of every university. I To the Editor: _ Parrish about it. . If the game is to be "good clean fun," it should not be of such im· sincerely hope· that this station is For almost four years now, I have Mr. Labriola has taken it upon 'F .. Lewine to Speak reopened immediately with new slept through' countless lectures from . himself to assail and degrade the portance as far as future playoff mutual understanding and respect. A tired old men wallowing in quotes quality of officiating exhibited .appearances go. distorted attitude on the part of this from the umpteenth printing of their . during the contest. He should know University-hqlder of the license own simply marvelous. textbooks, that . during the course Of any Mar'e Hitlin On Journalism Field will only prove to be self-defeating. and wished aloud that with all their intramural event (in any given sport) To the Editor: . . Carlos Montero Vera . the partiCipants will often dispute a knowledge, someone would "learn·' As a present student of Dr. Frances L. Lewine, veteran As· an active· role in the wire service's ruling by an official. It is in the B '76 them suckers to teach." AS a senior, r Robert Hitlin, I was outraged to sociated Press White House cor· coverage of the Watergate affair and can honestly say that there are very_ nature of sport. It is ironic that in learn recently that he was denied respondent and only the second the resignation of President Nixon. their frenzy to fulfill Mr. Labriola's few professors at this school who I tenure by the Government De· woman to be elected to the pre· ·Currently, Levrine is helping in SecuritY feel can communicate· well in a instruction to run up the score, some stigious Gridiron Club, will recount the coverage of the presidential To the Editor: partment of. this University. The classroom; This is why I became very of his friends on the Cheese com· grounds for his denial of tenure some of her worldwide journalistic ·campaign .. In response to your editorial of mitted several flagrant and blatant experiences at a special \ seminar in A graduate of Hunter College; Friday, March 26, 1976, we, as the upset when I heard. of another served only to add fuel to the fire of Georgetown decisive gem, to can turnovers that were obvious to my wrath. To deny tenure to a man 106 Healy, on Thursday, April 15, New York, Miss Lewine began her authors of the letter to which you eyes at 8:30 p.m. Professor Robert Hitlin. Now I'm not anyone with two in his head. because his priority is first to serve journalistic career as a reporter for refer, would like to set straight some' Mr. Labriola further chastised the . the Plainfield, NJ Courier·News and . about to burn my government books his students in as many ways as All faculty and students are misleading points. First, we did not officials for not making foul calls later joined the Associated Press at mention any rapes taking 'place in in a "Save Hitlin" movement, but I possible and only then to concen· invited to attend the session which is dare say that if some of the kindly that involved submarining, kneeing its Newark, New Jersey, bureau. Copley. No assaults there have been trate on pUblications of his own being sponsored jointly by the staffs old 'gentlemen from the tenure board and pushing by the fairer sex. If She was promoted to AP's Wash officially termed as such. Secondly, (especially since such publications of The HOYA and The Voice. would come down from Mt. Healy there was any intentional sub· are oftentimes little more than ego ington bureau in the late 1950's, and not all of the incidents referred to Appointed to AP's White House and sit in on one of his classes '... marining and kneeing, it did not gratifiers) seems to me to fly in the covered various governmental took place only in Copley-we also they might actually learn something. appear evident to the crowd. From staff during the Kennedy administra· agencies and manned key AP edi referred to crimes in New South. face of reason and smack at what I The man has a gift for teaching, and Mr. Labriola's description, the young feel should be the' goals of this tion, Miss Lewine travelled to 13 torial desks before winning thE! This fact brings us to our third point. is certainly on the verge (if he is not countries with the late president. coveted White House assignment. Not all of the crimes. reported in ladies sound like the Broad Street University. already there) of being an expert in She travelled around the world She is a past president of the Copley have taken place after stu· Bullies of basketball. From the tone Dr. Hitlin is an excellent professor his highly specialized field. It might of his article, Mr. Labriola has shown· who has served Georgetown with with President Lyndon B. Johnson Washington Press Club, formerly thE! dent guards went off duty. At least and to the SOviet Union and many Women's National Press Club, and three robberies -have taken place in also be noted here that I made my beyond a doubt that when it comes distinction: An inspiration to his lowest grade in four years at to basketball, he does not know one students, he is always available to other countries with President was elected a member of the the hours during which a student· Richard M. Nixon. She also played Gridiron Club only a few weeks ago. guard is on duty at the front door. Georgetown in one of his courses, so piece of his anatomy from the next. them. I have enjoyed few classes as As for the card system, it was our that is certainly not why I defend He has. also _. shown the willingness much as! enjoy his. understanding that it was imple· him. I ask the tenure board to and ability to take a cheap shot at Enough people I'm sure have reconsider its decision on Professor mented by the security department individuals from the protection of informed you of the above. I add my to cut down overall costs by not· Hitlin, not· for Professor· Hitlin The HOYA office. voice to the many others who have Hoya keeping stUdent guards on duty at (alone), but for the students of Mr. Labriola states that the screamed of the abuses of the present· night. No matter, the system is Georgetown. Give us a break, leave Intramural Department should tenure process. There 'is, however, a someone around who can tell us· inadequate. Fifth, we as Copley decide now whether it intends to more important thing I would like to what the dusty old books are trying take future competition between the comment on. This is in regard to the residents, have the right to complain to say. . Board of Editors Meeting to' and about 'student guards who Men's and Women's League seriously. statement of Government Depart· allow people into the dormitories Marc Mayo It is a shame that he, and others like ment ,Chairman Dr. William O'Brien Elections without identification. After all, they C '76 him, cannot accept the male·female in today's (March 26) issue of The are supposed to be .wo!king to competition as good clean fun, and HOY A. To quote the doctor: "I feel Monday, April 19 9:30 p.m. 'protect the residents. Isn't this the 1M Farce not as some sort of proving ground. sorry for the students who have reason why they are being paid? How If it serves certain .male egos to run organized the protest, because they would you' feel if· you were the To the Editor: up the score, so be it. Mr. Labriola have fallen victim to the American victim of a needless crime which was It has always been my belief that adds Jhatif the game is to be played Dream-the dream that says that you committed by someone a security an individual· gainfully employE}d in seriously, two competent referees the individual can make a differ· Big Bash-Harbin Formal Lounge guard had' let in because he didn't journalism should strive for objec· should be assigned to the game: Ifin ence." I wish to here take issue with want to be abused? ),c' ,'."._,. tiyity. in,reporttng a givenevent"Bob the futuieThe> HOYA seriously that statement. Saturday Night, April 24 . . Fihally, our le'ttercwas not.written Labriola in his article. regarding Mr. :qecides to ,report a specific event In this controversy over Dr. "soleLy to "criticiZ0,the ·stUdent guards Schulze's '''intramural farce?', takes objectively, your., pUblication· should Hitlin's tenure; we are not talking tiut also :to' maJ<.elipositive proposals exception. to this opinion. Having ·make the effort to assign -:a com· about the lonely cry of one or two SAXA Friday, April 9 RUSSIAN DRAMA CLUB PRESENTS "Father Unknown" in Russian. 7:30 p:m. Stage One. SEC BEGINS BLOW OUT WEEKEND 8 p.m. on Copley Lawn. Face Dancer with beer and munchies. SPRING FEVER PATIO PARTY 9 p.m. Darnall Formal Lpunge and Terrace Free admission. Music, dancing and spring tonic. COFFEEHOUSE 9 p.m., University Center Program Room featuring Stan Edelstein and Anne Marie Provost. Sponsored by SpC MONTY PlrrHON' AND THE HOLY GRAIL 8 p.m., LA-6 Auditorium. $1.50, $1 SES MIDNITE MOVIE the Marx Brothers in HORSEFEATHERS midnight. Uni versity Center Program Room, G-06 Healy. Saturday, April 10 SEC PRESENTS BLOW OUT WEEKEND PART II Copley Lawn. 1 p.m. STANKEYBROWN8p.m. Woody Allen's TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN COFFEEHOUSE 9 p.m. University Center Program Room featuring Abe Kasner and Gordon Kramer. Sponsored by SEC Sunday, April 11 SEC ENDS BLOWOUT WEEKEND Copley Lawn 1;6 p;m. Best of George town Entertainment, the last of the beer and munchies. RUSSIAN DRAMA CLUB presents "Father Unknown" in Russian 7:30 p.m. Stage One. . JAZZ AT THE PUB returns with the Basin Street Jazz Band featuring Stella Taylor 8 p.m. - midnight, University Center. LAST DUPLICATE BRIDGE TOURNAMENT sponsored by Harbin House Council at 7:30, Harbin Formal Lounge. Call Mark at 338-0381 to re serve board space. LORD NELSON MASS BY HAYDN will be performed at 4 p.m. in Dahl gren Chapel by the GU Chorus and the Georgetown Sympnony Orches tra. Featuring Jane White, Charlene Cooper, Michael Peerless and Michael Miller as soloists under the direction of Paul Hill, Chorus di rector. Free. MONTY PYTHON AND THE HOLY GRAIL 8 p.m., LA-6 $1.50, $1 SES. Monday, April 12 SPECIAL INTERVIEWING WORKSHOP tips on job interviewing tech niques, a film, discussion, and some video taping of mock interviews for compliment, criticism, and commentary. 9:30 a.m.-noon. Sign up in ad '1 vance at the Center for Career Planning and Placement. BRAZILIAN GUITARIST Dogoberto Linhares will perform at 8:30 p.m. in the Hall of Nations. Reception following in Palms Lounge Admission $1 Sponsored by Lusa-Brazilian Club. Thursday, April 15 REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE University Center/Sec film series. 9 p.m. Center Program Room 50c, free with SES. SPECIAL NOTICES UPCOMING EVENTS THE RED CROSS NEEDS HELP IN THE BICENTENNIAL Guides, transla tors, 1st Aid, Radio Operators, Transportation. For mOfe information or to sign up drop in the University Center Office, G-16 Healy. t'age I) 1 he HOY A Friday, April 9, 1976 Qlts &leiSUle King's Dream, Ford's Nightmare On Tuesday night, I Have A hasn't the slightest idea of what to habit of booting his lines at critical the sound of a leaky gutter splashing Dream opened a three week run at do with his actors. Martin Aron moments. But Billy Dee Williams water on a piece of tih; Ms. Ramsey Ford's Theatre. I really wish that it stein's lighting· design runs from the obviously tries' ... So hard in fact, possesses what must be the worst hadn't. Nurenberg "column of light" effect that he damn near hugs the role to voice ~heard puhlically since Florence The idea of the play is a simple to occasional subtlety. Add to this death. . Foster Jenkins. She was not able. tt) one: Dramatize the life of Dr.-Martin the fact that Donald Harris' set As bad as Williams was (and I put two notes together successfully Luther King from. the Montgomery design simply does not work, and consider playing the "I have a all night. Kenny Moore's idea of Bus Boycott in 1955 until his death you can get a pretty good idea of the dream" speech as a cross between playing a piano or an organ is, by the in 1968. Josh Greenfeld, the play's play's worth right off the bat. Mussolini and Curtis Mayfield to be way, to attack it. Actually, assaulting author, unfortunately, has bitten 0 ff Someone, I think jokingly, called bad acting), Williams was a four-time the instruments helped _ . _ it served more than he can chew. The play what Billy Dee Williams was doing on Oscar winner compared to the antics the admirable function of drowning seems awash in history. Instead of stage "ac'ting". He played Martin of Judyann Elder and Marion Ram out Ms. Ramsey. focusing in on three or four major Luther King as though he were sey. Ms. Elder, who in many portions When Ms. Elder as Coretta King events in King's li fe, the play uses the Walter Fauntroy, and the results of the play acted the role of Coretta goes through a monologue about the scatter-shot approach instead. The were uniformly disappOinting. Let's King, was so wooden that 1 thought I way Martin looked in the casket, it results are a production that is face it: Williams started out with a detected the words "Georgia Pacific" would have been touching had it not inconsistent and choppy. Until I had nearly impossible task: No actor stamped on her forehead. Her deliv been so maudlin and had Ms. Elder seen this play I did not think it would dare imitate Martin Luther ery was the flattest I have ever had been able to act: It was, in.a word, possible to make Dr. King's life King, and Williams doesn't have the the misfortune to hear, and her total cheap. either hackneyed or boring. ability to interpret King. The result is . inability to create any stage presence All things considered, I Have A Part of the blame rests with that Williams completely lacks be· whatsoever did not help matters. Dream tries to 'do too much with too director Robert Greenwald, who lievability as Dr. King. He also has a But as for Ms. Ramsey, Ford's little talent. This production is an casting director should be ashamed· unfortunate deviation from Ford's of himself. At times, Ms. Ramsey is Theatre's usual high standard of Roal of the Greo.sepaint asked to sing. Are you familiar with excellence_ -[van Katz Billy Dee Williams is more jester than I 'f i precious ••. ·give it a chance ~ Birthright 00 526-3333 in EUROPE ooAltemati".. to.Abortion How to flyhome Duplicate Bridge Tournament Harbin House Council Prizes, refreshments the face of infI.ation. Sunday, April 19 NEW YORK Harbin Lounge 7:30 p.m. Flying home economically The Freedom Fare. is simple when you t~ke off It's brand new, offering up TO LUXEMBOURG on Allegheny. And take ad to 30% savings before June 1 City!, vantage bfthe big choice of· and after September l5.Dur discount air travel plans. ing the summer season, the Newest For instance: discount is 20%. Freedom Far~ seating is limited on each DEPARTURE MAY 18th Boutique The Liberty Fare. flight,·so advance reserva You can go home and a lot tions and pre-purchase of OPEN. RETURN & Salon of other places besides, with tickets are required. Good unlimited air travel atone, everywhere, except Canada. low price. You get a choice of The Weekend Plan. At our Boutique we've Return Any Time Within One Year brought over the finer plans too. ? days for $135, Take off as early as ? PM· French clothes and acces· ·14 days for $155, or 21 days Friday--return as late as sories. Without bringing over for $185. Good everywhere we noon Monday and save up to the higher price tags that fly, except Ca~ada. Ad vance usually go with them. 25% roundtrip between our purchase requlred. At our Salon, our experienced U.S. cities. Good anytime- $310 plus $3.00 European-trained haircutters ,Group 4 to 9* including holiday weekends can give you the finer cut at . with advance reservations a sensible price. Groups of 4 to 9 save up to . and pre-purchase of t;!:ckEfts. Departure Tax 20% roundtrip between any It's your move. of our U.s. cities. Simply make reservations and pur- See your Travel Agent for . chase tickets 48 hours in complete details on our dis CONTACT: NATIONAL advance--and travel to count air travel plans. Or gether. Our Group 10 Plan call Allegheny. We'll show , saves larger groups up to you how to fly in. the face STUDENT of inflation. Men-Women 33-1/3% roundtrip. A $5 introductory discount for cut & style Fares subject to change without notice. TRAVEL BUREAU ·EflectiveApril1,1976. with presentation of this ad Open Sundays 202-265-9890 Elle et Lui New Coiffure/New Couture Ask for Lois For Men and Women 1643 Wisconsin Ave., NoW . In the Evening: 202-338-3170 Washington D.C. 20007 ALLEGi (202) 338~3113 (#7864) Friday, April 9, 1976 The HOYA Page 7 •• • • • \ enteltalnment Watergate Made 'Perfecdy Clear' It's been a long road from The In the words of Carl Bernstein, those of the actors, Woodward, comeraderie. Redford is surprising as Front Page and Five Star Final to All "It's journalism as journalism really Bernstein, Benjamin Bradlee. and Ivy·leaguer Woodward. For the first The,President's Men. But then there's is." In other words, the firm can be Deep Throat. time since Butch Cassidy he seems to a marked difference between,fiction clasSified as a dramatized documen·. All The President's Men is a film feel at home in the role. The key to and fact. . tarY. which relies exclusively on the his success lies in his insistence on If successful, All The President's Produced by Robert Redford and actors, and in general, the. cast largely underplaying his attractive Men could stand as a turning point in directed by the fitful genius of Alan performs almost too well in that they but vapid tendency to flirt with the the annals of American cinema. The J, Pakula (Klute, The Parallax View), don't seem to be acting at times. camera. In this film Redford the film' has all the earmarks ofa All The President's Men strips away a As the mismatched reporting team producer inspires Redford the actor "blockbuster" without 'having had to large portion of the book's deep known as "Woodstein" at the Post, with a serious direction. wallow in the ostentation of Holly· background and focuses on the two Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman The most flamboyant portrayal in wood. In 'fact, even the Kennedy "hungry" reporters. ·the film belongs to Jason Robards' Center opening, despite dogged' ef· Screenwriter William Goldman Bradlee. The real Bradlee is infamous fort to glamorize the affair, was (Butch Cassidy and the Sundance for his commanding manner. fairly mundane, attended pre· Kid) has elected to, for example, Robards' long friendship with Brad dominantly by journalists as a stop the film short of the book's lee allows him to render a twin·like benefit for the Fund for Investigative finish, with the 1972 inauguration of characterization of the Post mentor. Journalism. The movie crowd was Richard Nixon. He has also deleted a Supporting performances by Jack there, too, but only to play second large portion of the unwieldy investi· Warden and Martin Balsam as Harry fiddle to the real stars, Bob Wood· gative process. He has refined the' Rosenfeld and Howard Simmons, ward and Carl Bernstein and their scenes with key witnesses rather than two other editors are crafted with Washington Post colleagues. . draw a sketchy screenplay of the great attention to the mundane Based on their literally earth·' entire process. In simplifying the facets of workaday journalism. shaking account of the arduous facts and making the investigation investigative process which brought seem more compact and simple than As Deep Throat, Hal Holbrook about the downfall of President it id depicted to be in the book has three increasingly condescending . Richard M. Nixon and his men,the Goldman and Pakula have taken a and mysterious appearances by the film :is remarkable in its unique blend risk, one which in most instances still anonymous informer the only tinge of film·induced apprehension of the historic facts and the movie pays off. industry's craft. To wary Americans who followed and fear in the entire movie. As the the Post Watergate allegations with a Republican bookeeper who induced questioning eye and an open ear to Woodstein's slush fund story Jane the White House denials the intense Alexander is pitiably nervous in her Swingin' Time with "Fatha" HIDes experience of this two hour docu· disclosure of obscured CREEP mis· mentation of an immediate constitu deeds. his most talented accompaniment, The movie was and still is a risk Appearing through April 17 at recordings starting in 1928, which tional crisis puts the entire affair in a Bernstein Blues Alley is' a classic jazz pianist. catapulted him into prominence. which includes Marva Josie, vocalist, for its makers and its models. The very close perspective. The effect is putting the pieces together. 'who truly knows the meaning of the During the thirties and forties Rudy Rutherford on reeds, drummer as gripping a detective mystery as public may not react well to a film so word performance. Hines led one of the most versatile Eddie Graham and Harley White on anything of Arthur Conan Doyle's. perform with an effective indepen devoid of the acceptable quota of sex Earl "Fatha" Hines has consistent· swing bands around'. As an eminent 'bass. What seems most amazing about dence. If they had tried to playas and violence. Yet the story it tells ly inspired 'audiences with his im· bandleader, he substantially fur· After nine years singing with Earl Pokula's rendition of the Watergate too much of a team r am afraid should realistically outweigh any peccable piano style for nearly 50 thered the careers of several out· . Hines, Miss' Josie has carefully story is the cast's ability to portray Hoffman would overshadow Redford desire for entertainment. All The years. It is impossible to measure the standing jazz artists, most notably cultured a distinctive and fulfilling with incredible security roles which with his finely honed characteriza President's Men is an education. It is influence this man has had no~ only are not the product of some tion of Bernstein. But this is not the ironic that the only people who have on fellow keyboard artists, but screenwriter's imagination, but real case. The two actors playas Wood learned the lesson it has to teach bandleaders, vocalists, composers and "We never play nothing the same way twice." people. And people whose personali stein did in 1972 with an aloof were the people whom the film is avid students of jazz during the ties and talents rival if not upstage friendship and professional about.-RK course of his career. As an innovator Dizzy Gillespie, Charlie Parker and style.' Her remarkable range and in his field, Hines ranks 'second to control are consistently displayed in none. Sarah Vaughan. In 1966, his jazz band became the second such group such timeless pieces as Gershwin's The sublime Fatha made his initial "Summertime" and "Jelly Always on . impact during the 1920's when he to visit the Soviet Union under the GD Chorus, Symphony Penonns Cultural Presentations Program, pre· My Mind." She proceeds to move helped br.<;>aden· the pOSSibilities 'of into a medley of Dinah Washington ... .-.: ..... ,-_ • .~,-:-;:-,~~.,._":!.!""_.-~~~.':?".a. ...._.;.~?'i:.:,..-o:'".-.- :r~_" ,,';t!pd. Dt;llv .hv. Ronnv" Qootimllt:l_ collaborate a frequently with LOUIS During that tour, Earl Hmes and hIS tunes,' alwaYs-·proJectlng- a warm, -,-_ .• Armstrong on a series of memorable band presented 31 concerts in 111 captivating mood, whether it's a soft cities, delighting over 90,000 ballad, a swing tune in four or slow, Haydri Mass in Dahlgren Sunday Russians with a repertoire designed powerful blues. Miss Josie is a: to reflect the variety of Ame~icaI;l first·class singer, and more:wi,lI' be The Haydn fest is rebt>rn this number, the Gloria features an Center performer. Hill, with the aid. jazz forms in the past thirty years., hfuetaurdre.alJOut tb,isgifted lacl.y.'il.},the~; ,Sunday afternoon in Dahlgren interesting exchange between solo of Orchestra conductor John Welsh" • While he has deviated little from Chapel, as the Georgetown Univer· soprano Jane White and the Chorus. . appears to have captured the 18th, his original style, Hines' complete Rudy Rutherford is' a well· .sity Chorus and Symphony Orchestra Ms. White is a treat in her George· century Enlightenment style as well command of the keyboard never fails rounded and accomplished reed present for their spring recital the town debut and the Chorus exhibits as inner motivation of Haydn. to amaze listeners of varied ages and player. More often than not, he will Lord Nelson Mass. a tonal quality that should be well Nelson is a pleasure after the . backgrounds. Jazz critic Leonard play alto and tenor saxophone, flute The Nelson Mass, the most popu. received in the improved acoustics of Chorus' recent Bicentennial concert Feather once wrote: "He has a way and clarinet aU in one number. His lar of Joseph Haydn's 14 Masses, was refurbished Dahlgren. The soprano' (America Sings), which was staged of swinging that is all his own, improvisations are timely, captivating composed in 1798, in an amazingly and alto singers in the Gloria are with all the grace of the San sometimes in jaggedly irregular single and full of intense energy. especially brief 53 days. The stimulus for particularly inspirational. Comments Francisco, Earthquake. The Nelson note line, often with sequences of on Gershwin's "He'll Come Along, Haydn's genius came with news of alto section head Mary Jean Egan: Mass is being produced by the same octaves so sharply articulated that The Man I Love" and Duke Elling- Admiral Horatio Nelson's defeat of "It's a lively, vibrant piece, one you students who organized the success they once earned him a reputation as ton's "Things Ain't What They Used Napoleon at the Battle of the Nile. get swept up in very easily." ful Christmas recital, Hodie. The 'the trumpet style pianist.' " Count To Be." Backing the Fatha's infal· To Haydn, an Austrian by birth who As the Chorus contributes a solid performers are thus to be com Basie goes much further" calling lible keyboard work is Harley'White had become enamored with Britain performance throughout, so the mended for putting together a Hines "the greatest piano player in on bass, who is steady as anyone in following a popular tour of London Symphony Orchestra, too, has sever· majestic yet lively rendition that the'world," an immense compliment the business, and a very talented in 1790, the battle appeared to crush al memorable moments. One of these promises to add something to the which the Fatha would probably Eddie Graham, whose drum ride on the Frenchman's dreams of empire. comes at the Benedictus, with the Easter season. greet with a wide toothy grin and an Ellington's "Caravan" is literally But despite Napoleon's resurgence brass in brilliant accompaniment to An interesting sidelight is that the appropriate sly joke. something one has to see to believe. and despite the fact that Haydn's the lyrics "Blessed is he who comes recital is to be recorded by an Whatever his wid~ range of merits, To quote the immortal Fatha, sense of history suffered, his sense of in the name of the Lord." The lyrics independent record company, a sur Earl Hines is 'first and foremost a "we never play nothing the same way music did not. The composer ignores and intense character of the instru· prising innovation, in that there are performer. Perhaps his greatest gift is twice." Anyone who gets the chance woodwind" making extensive use of mental accompaniment are a recog· presently only three recordings of his uncanny ability: both to charm to see Earl Hines and his group play brass and strings to emphasize the nition of the triumph of Nelson as Haydn's Nelson Mass. and entertain his audiences, where more than once would be hard· victory of Lord Nelson. well as of Christ in the Mass. The performance begins Sunday Earl ··Fatha" Hines his fanCiful storYtelling and low, pressed, indeed, to arrive at any Particularly noteworthy in this The recital is under the direction at 4:00 in Dalllgren Chapel, and gruff singing voice are always ready other conclusion. delightful performance is the singing of Mr. Paul Hill, leader of the Paul admission is free. to broaden the show. Then there is Ken Glick of the Gloria. A fast·paced, beautiful Hill Chorale, a frequent Kennedy -Kenneth Thomas Zemsky "Look into the Pat&rel TheAll-New preview trJJ@ifD@lfi)@~ [l@mru~©rRl A Iron On Book . of things to come. to decorote T·shirts, tanl~ tops, or Grondma's favorite sofa. JOURNEY LOOK INTO THE FUTURE inclui:iing: On A Saturday Nite!lt's All Too Much You're On Your Own/Midnight D~eamer I'm Gonna Leave You You have something to share with the people of the rural South and Appalachia -yourself. Find out about the opportunities ,open to you as a Glenmary Priest, Brother or Sister. Gregg Rolie, Neal Schon, For free information about oppor' tunities with Glenmory Home Mis sioners. write: Ross Valory, Aynsley Dunbar.", Sixteen creations from those swell folks at Natlampeo, GLEN MARY. R00m 137 Journey is coming. . the company that will sell you anything. Box 46404 Cincinnati. Ohio 45246 Iron-ons include political put·dawns, purely artistic designs in the "Look Into the Future:' National lampoon fashion, and other full·colar art and words and o Also please send free miscellanea that have never before been seen in the short but 17" x 22" God Made Me You'll hear Journey. fascinating history of the l·shirt. Poster. Shown Above, These heat·transfer designs would ordinarily sell at stores every· o ~end fr~e poster only, \ where for $1.00 each instead of 16 for 52.50, but Notional lampoon designs are not avciilable at stores anywhere. Name~ ______The National Lampoon Iron On Book is distributed in bookstores and on newsstands on a limited basis and may not available In Address' ____~ __------~ P'od~Y~~Y~~I~:~"i~m~'~=,oc®"'COLUMBIA."!9j I.tARCASREG.1Q1916CDSI~. be your orea. If not. you can order it by sending $2,50 to the Notional Cily, ______$Iole _____ ORPHEUS RECORDS Lampoon. 6J5 Madison Avenue, NewYorl~, NewYorll. 10022. Please 3228 M St.,1024 Connecticut Ave. be sure to print your name and address. listing your correct zip Zip' ______Age, ____ $3.99 (ode number, Page 8 The HOYA Friday, April 9, 1976 G.UMore Than a Cout:ltry Club? by Mark McAdams 'stUdent outbreaks reminiscent of the decreased. We are spending fewer , determining ,different ,levels of ~om. After the student outbraks of the May Day demonstrations. dollars ,for Student Development· pensation ... I am convinced that, if mid- to late sixties had subsided, "We retreated in the face of services than other institutions with we have top-flight administrators in universities across the nation seemed felony. Because of, this fear, the whom we compete for students and whatever areas, they will pay for the to return .to normal. Students be entire arsenal of 'services came compare. salaries; At Georgetown salary differential needed to obtain came less interested in the' present about." , ' University we spend 1.7% of the such people in distinction from and began to plan for the future. Using Georgetown's offerings of, educational and general funds of the mediocre and second-level type ad- However, a number of professors psychiatric services as an example, he University for student development ministrators." , are contending that things have in said, "The idea that a large group of services-our sister ~nstitutions spend The salaries committee replied: fact not returned to normal-they people behaved in a shabby way does 5%." ~'Administrators are, engaged to·serve only seem so. These professors have not mean he (the student) needs Robinson. said, "A university is the academic mission of the faculty , been waging a war of correspondence psychiatric help." not obliged' to serve the prevailing which is and historically has been, with the administration for a number Vice President for Student attitudes. There 'is reflected at the University; but, with rare ex-' of years, questioni,ng the University's I)evelopment, Dr. Patricia Rueckel" Georgetown an idea of service that ceptions, they are not adding to the priorities as an institution. said that Professor Robinson's allega comes closest to WP A standards. A UniversitY's means, so they do not According to Dr. Daniel Robin tions are "absolutely erroneous. He's University. serves any society worth pay for themselves as you assert." not very good student of higher son, Professor in the Psychology a saving. It does not serve lunch. At Vice President for Administrative Department, American universities education in America. He's tuned in some point students are going to be ,Services Daniel J. AltobeUo said that hav~ begun to offer more services, on a European model. Student fed up with being treated as weak; ,"faculty and students shouldn't have like those of Student. Development, services are not a reaction to the irresolute, and'morally bankrupt men to waste their time doing what we to appease the students whims and sixties. Over the last six years the and women." insure that there are no future . budget for Student Development has do_ Our role is to facilitate. If you Professor Ayers, Chairman of the only had faculty and students, would Faculty Senate Committee on Sala faculty run the administration'? We departments are sound, Robinson departmental lines. There are 320 In The Nation This Week ries, complained that the administra must do certain things and when said, "The University takes depart full· time professors. It· is very tion is under the assumption that those services are no longer required, ment heads too seriously." difficult to relate on an intimate level they (the administration) are the Executive Vice President for . with 011e." THE AMERICAN MERCENARIES we will be told by the Board of University. In a memorandum to Directors." , Academic Affairs the Rev. .. Aloysius Ayers said the University.. has University President Robert J. Henle, P_ Kelley, SJ, said, "There 'is a study allocllted funds indiscriminantly to Today, post war recession, inflation and unemployment SJ, the salaries committee cited a Professor Ayers contends that every department, pOinting out that they Board of' Directors is not' in ,group of department chairmen who' have set adrift a small army of veterans of Viet Nam' who report in .Th~ HOY A that a number are looking into a more detailed last year each department received an touch with ,the University. He said , must sell their skills ... of top administrative vice presidents process of evaluating each depart· 8% increase regardless of need. were making "$40,000 and' more that "the faculty must reclaim the Father 'Kelley said that' "it, is It has become clear that there is indeed a community of University. The University is not an ment." He maintains, however"the approximately 200% of the sa]ary for need for decentralizing', power difficult to evaluate which depart "fighting men" imbued with right-wing ideology who are a full professor on the Main Campus administered entity but a creative entity." . through the departments, saY!J!.g, inentsneed more money. How do for sale in the United States at Georgetown. Ayers said that these "The problems of the Main Campus you decide in the abstract."· , salaries were in fact $2,000-$5,000 The professors interviewed all A network reporter who spoke to the "mercs" reports. are very. complex. In order to Ayers said that 8% across the higher than the average salary for agreed that the faculty is unable to coordinate such diversity universities board increase was a de facto "that as many as 5 ou t of 6 mercenaries who went to university Presidents of AAUP Class assume what they considered proper have traditionally organized along decision. Angola were killed." 1 Universities and' control of the University due to a $7,000-$10,000 higher than the lack of effective leadership. 9th, 10th, 1,1th of April "They do not yet make up a coherent political movement Marcia Sakamoto average of Academic Vice Presidents Professor Ayers said, "The faculty 8:30 p.m.' but their special weaponry. special skills and special'disen' for the same class," has been effectively without a head." and Dancers chantment are very real. They rather ominously number in Father Henle answered the com He said that although the University 2Z:00 students Dance PrOject the thousands, they are for hire and they will bear watching." mittee's charges in a memorandum. had an Academic Vice PreSident, the 3:00 general " ... In the national statistics, titles faculty lacks a true spokesman. He for further information call may seem to be the same but concludes that because of this the 242418th St. NW From an article in this week's Nation adually the job descriptions in quality of many departments has Entrance in Rear Dance Project - 462-1321 The Nation. 333 Sixth Avenue. NYC 10014 different institutions and the range suffered. Special rates of authOrity and responsibility all When asked if it wasn't the for students differ considerably and would, of responsibility of department chair course, have a strong influence on men to insure that· their respective • • 3 -073g W,SCONSIN AVE. .'" GEORGETOWN MALL '657 ~91l-j5' . ',,:_, 'I r·j SOOL) CORDEL,L AVE: ,:' 'BET~~' DA;,· ,I U '~. ~,1IJ,:.; , .. , -'"Aa?:~,.. ,~ ;'~-- .. '~'" '.~. _.= .~ ...... -"_-- ., .. "~ , --- a Not if it's an extraordinary Pilot Razor Point marker pen. A fiber·tipped pen so precisely balanced, it will always feel comfortable in your hand, even after hours of writing. Its sturdy plastic point, surrounded by a unique Pilot metal "collar" writes a distinctly smooth, sharp line. In fact, it's the thinnest tipped pen you can buy, And that makes it just gr!jat for pages of notes or that one important love letter. Best of all, it's only 69c and is now available at your college book store, , So ii your Pilot pen makes you lovesick, don't be ashamed to admit it. I1fter all, it'll always be good to you, HUGE FRAME SELECTION ALL THE· LATEST STYLES EVES EXAMINED CONTACT LENSES $125.00 PRESCRIPTIONS FILLED LENSES DUPLICATED ONE HOUR SERVICE Pabst. Since 1844. SPECIAL STUDENT DISCOUNTS AT~AJlYTlC' The quality has always DPTICAL . come through. 1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NW PABST BREWING COMPANY (CONVENIENT TO GU) Milwaukee Wis .. Peoria Heights. III.. Newark. N,J .. Los Angeles. Calif., Pabst, Georgia. • • DAILY 9-6; sAT. 9-3 466·2050 Friday, April 9, 1976 The HOY A Page 9 4Ixmen. Drop 4th Straight Yes ••• Clnd it Counts/Lou De mUle Henle's Holdout As Morgan St. Wins 25-4 Whatever happened to baseball being America's national by Lou DeMille 3-2 on a breakaway goal by attack- pastime? . _. and Mike Perlmuter . mall John Watson. Watson's score Baseball at Georgetown can hardly be considered a pastime . Mired intlie midst ofafour game came· off a sparkling move· after an In the next couple of years, a more precise term describing the losing; . streak, Georgetown's assist by goalie Brennan. Down 4-3 at popularity of the sport on the Hilltop might be "passed away." strug~\b:lglacrosse team Was crushed . the'.endof·.the first quarter; George· byt)i~;quick,aD(1 muscular laxmen of town slipped, further hehiild being Something must be done to pump new life into the system. Morgan State,24·5 'wednesday after outscored three to nothing in the Prior to the scholastic year, the baseball program was nOQri,.TheHoyas were also destroyed second stanza. 'But the 7·3 deficit allotted three tuition grants per. student class, amounting to by .the·Gettysburg Bullets 17-3 and was quite, resRectable against· the twelve per year. Although these grants appeared to be WilI~am .. and Mary 1B-4 this paSt William' and Mary squad,. which is extravagant, they were barely enough to keep the Hoyas week~. ranked eighteenth in the country . Playing according to form, the The second half proved a disaster competitive, since American University was the only other GeQrgetown squad managed to keep for the Boya laxmen. Mental lapses school in the DC area to operate on a limited scholarship level. the. game respectable during the first combined with. several costly penal In December 1974, the University dealt a fatal blow to quarter agail'!st Morgan State. Playing ties aidedWiUiam and Mary's attack Georgetown's baseball program by cutting all scholarship as· the Colonials routed George without two starting defenSe men, money from the sport. After those who were originally granted Milte Fullam (out for the Season with town eleven to one over the last two a punctured eardrum) and Joe De periods. ·Penalties for "Unsportsman scholarships pass through the "hallowed Healy gates" for the Marzo, the make-shift Hoya defen like Conduct,'.' "Unnecessary rough final time, baseball appears doomed to a pathetic existence at sive 'lineup proved no match for ness" and "checking above the Georgetown. State's fast break offense as the game shoulder" consistently forced the Baseball scholarships were slashed "in order to increase dragged on. Hoya squad to playa man down. The student academic aid," according to the Director of the Budget State's attackmen consistently constant pressure against Bren1'!an penetrated Georgetown's confused proved fatal, since the Georgetown Eldon Hale. The termination occurred even though financial aid defense for point-blank shots against scoring attack .also proved non received an increase of over nine per cent compared to the the Hoyas shell-shocked goalie Ed existent during the last thirty preceding year. Brennan:'With John O'Connor as the minutes of play. It hardly seems realistic or prr..ctical to kill the entire only regular defensiveman, Brennan Georgetown played the same note scholarship program of a single sport in order to balancelhe spent the entire afternoon struggling . in . the . Gettysburg affair. After to ward off blasts from the point, battling the Bullets tooth and nail to financial aid budget. But then how many times are the words obviously without a great deal of a very even 3-3· halftime score, the "practicality" and "Georgetown" ever mentioned in the same success. bottom fell out for Georgetown to breath? Jim Conway, Andy Murray, Jeff the tune of fourteen second half It's not as if there were a demand for the entire scholarship Zalkin, Bob Hannon and Seth goals for the fired-up Gettysburg program to be reinstated, but at least one scholarship per class Levenberg provided the only light to squad. would prove beneficial. an otherwise bleak afternoon, each AJ; far as the Hoyas were con· The Georgetown lax men travel to Villanova, Pa. tomorrow in an attempt to scoring single tallies'. cerned, they could have played halt their four-game losing skid. If the University felt that part of the baseball scholarship Inthe William and Mary contest, . second quarters all day long. Only . jerseys. Only 0:40 seconds into the For Gettysburg, it was a chance to program should be sacrificed, then so be it. But let's not cut one Georgetown surprised quite a few 0:38 seconds into the period, Fresh finale, Mike Barnes rifled good improve scoring statistics and program to shreds, while leaving the extravaganzas of another people in the opening period, leading man Andy Murray opened fire on the Gettysburg's fourth extra-man goal. averages. Mike Barnes left Kehoe untouched. Once again the track program at Georgetown Bullet's Walt Warner and knotted His was fallowed by six more goals Field 4 goals and 2 assists richer; appears to provide the answer for the Athletic Department's things at one apiece. Three minutes Bruce Reynolds carried home 2 goals before the timekeeper could declare financial crunch. later, captain Jeff Zalkin got into the the game over, and the referee called and 1 assist; and Nick Korba added Cheese Drops scoring act on a pass from Seth Georgetown down and out on a five· points, four on assists to his If the track budget were sheared, then baseball-along with Levenberg, and the Hoyas opened a TKO. yearly total. Lacrosse and Soccer-could receive some financial backing in one goal lead. ThiW extended their order to keep Georgetown's intercollegiate squads respectable. lead two minutes later, when Leven Second Test berg's earlier favor was returned. Not one team on Georgetown's spring baseball schedule does Dished the ball in front of the Bullet 2nd Harbin, Wash Club not offer scholarships, or at least tuition grants, to its athletes. net by Bob Hannon, Levenberg If the Hoyas continue to play against overwhelming odds, in To FCC Team widened the gap to 3-l. three years the 15·3 and 12-1 embarassrnents will prove to be What happened next? It's hard to . the rule rather than the exception. by Bob LabriOla be certain. Gettysburg proceded to Travel To Catholic U. The baseball scholarship problem took' "'l'l,...th,,~ "_.~..,.l, ~111" Geo'rgetown's finest, Macaroni & out·shoot, out-checlr, and out·run Cheese, represented the Hilltop in Georgetown all over the field for 16 Georgetown's Intramural Co-ed tal{€ on Ga\laudet in a 4:30 contest. semester when sophomore Mike Via dropped out of school. the' DC Metropolitan Extramural straight goals. In the second period, and Team Volleyball championships Washington Club, which finished With Vi~'s withdrawal, two and a half years worth of a tuition Basketball Championships on Satur· after tlte Hoya fireworks, the Bullets head into action tonight in Washing· second to Legs in the Georgetown grant became available to the program. One semester's worth of day, April 3 at George Washington's rallied'back with two .goals to enter ton's fifth annual Metropolitan Co.ed competition, will face GaUau- Smith Center. a scholarship will be forfeited unless action is taken on the the locker room happily tied at Volleyball tournament at Catholic det in the quarter·final action which matter before June first of this year. In the opening round, Macaroni & t.hree. Universitv. begiU!;.3t 5:J!i, :RPb.c3us.e players from rhpPlc;:.P n:r~c: ~?i!:2i1 ~""~ws:t "thp r>o.. h$lTn. Because or last year's ruling, the money can not be utilized plOns rrom"l'jOnnern vlrglnla'vom· '"'~"""_""-"'.~.-J_'-.-'--.• ~-~~ .... c 'umll ' ""cuu« . riar/:lln, W1.I1CIl "aereated . the ::>econd Hal' III squad were also munity College, whom they defeated period down 10·3, it was obvious any Volleyball Team in the finals, opens on Legs in the Cooed division, the to lure a prospect under the Georgetown colors this season. 67·56. hopes of victory would have to this afternoon's action with a contest Washington Club was selected as an Since Father Henle's office declared that no further baseball materialize in an immediate score. against the George Mason representa· alternate representative, since a Cheese began the game in a zone, scholarships may be issued, the recipient must come from this . but found' themselves quickly be .And just that happened-only it W3$ tives at 3 o'C\9ck. If 2nd Harbin ad, player is allowed to compete in only by the,:~o~ks in thewrong.colore!i vances t?;;~h~;cNc~rterfin~~~Jhey wHI, .. ,ol:l..e',Extramuralcoinpetition:. year's, squad. hin~, 12·4, ~ith _15~~J.remaiping in Proposals· have been formulated which would either split the the:~i!~~ ,.t\a1f"as ,~.l.l.lt. qfNort,Mrn . Virginia's outside shooting. A switch grant among fout players already on the squad, provide to a man·to-man' defense coupled scholarship for a ballplayer on the same grade level as Mike Via, with the insertion of Mark "Yogi" Legs:, 2t.dft"a'rbIIlWin or utilize the money for badly needed furnishings for the Ellsworth, brought the Cheese to a Hilltop diamond-such as a replacement for the scoreboard deadlock at 12 with 12:40 left. which was torn down during the spring of 1974. The logical Ellsworth .sparked the anemic of· fense, connecting on three of his first choice appears to permit Coach Tommy Nolan the opportunity four field goal attempts. Championship Games to reward one of his own players who has already proved his Macaroni & Cheese took an value on the field. eight'point lead, 37.29, shortly after by Bob Labriola The Co-Ed playoffs were charac· raised their record to 4·0 with a Georgetown Athletic Director Frank Rienzo has known of the start of the second half, and and Bob Klein terized by several matches pitting forfeit win over Fourth New and Old the situation since early February. He contends that if the seemingly had the game well in hand. The proverbial pot of gold at the teams of equal strength against each North. University decides to allot another baseball tuition grant to a Once again, the outside sbooting of end of the Intramural rainbow, the other, causing some marathon In Men's Independent, ties rule team member, a credit on a tuition bill will prove to be the onlY Steve Redmond and Tyrone Platt E}{tramural Tournament, was matches. WaShington Club reached most leagues at this point. In A, proved to unnerve the Cheese, and reached by two volleyball teams the finals be defeating Oreos, who Slimes, 5·0, sank H.M.S. Hom, 10·8, necessary action. . Northern Virginia took a 50-49 lead which will represent Georgetown in had been sparked throughout the while SLA + 1 stayed close at 4·0 But how many times has an action so simple been brushed with 5:56 to go. the tournament to be held at entire season by Nancy Ripp. Legs after being rained out. In B, the aside by a bureaucrat until a later date and never occurred at all? At that stage, Lawson Day (10 Catholic University on April 9. gained a berth in the championship Brooklyn Dodgers took a forfeit points), Alex Haggis (12 points) and If this current matter is placed by the wayside and merely Second Harbin successfully de· by squeaking past Nonames, 2-1, led from the Yankees to go to 5·0, while forgotten, then something is tragically wrong. Tim ·Fitzgibbons (12 points) took fended its Dormitory Championship, by "complete players," Mark W.C. Accelerator also won by forfeit over and carried Georgetown to its defeating Second New North, 2-0, Wittleder and Dwyn Dithmer. over Orange Sunshine to follow at It's bad enough that the University stripped the baseball first-round victory. Mark Ellsworth behind the serving excellence of Neil Legs copped the final, 2-1, behind 4-0. program bare last year, but to steal what little money the sport led the scoring parade with 13 points Scriptunas and the front-line play of the leadership of Lenore Hinckley still maintains would be a travesty. and Eddie Ryan also added 12. Charles BlaCkley has sale pos· Mike Smith. and the net play of Lawson Day. session of C after a 12·7 victory over Georgetown could not get un· In the Independent League, Finally providing some front Expose. In League D. Euclid Boys tracked in its quarterfinal game Volleyball Team coasted to the runners in the race to the playoffs, Club shut out Perverts, Inc., 14·0, against Federal City College, the championship, earning the right to softball is headed into the second and Bliinpie's Heroes won by forfeit eventual champions, and was blown play Second Harbin. Dale Parrish and half stretch. away, 65-32. Alex Haggis, in his last over Oars. Both are 3·0. White Mike DeVita provided the necessary In Men's Dorm Division League A, Lightning took Hack & Slash 11-3 in game, scored 9 pOints, the high for impetus. Second New North, now at 6-0, the "Game of the Century" to tie at the Cheese, followed by Eddie Ryan The school championship lived up trounced Fourth New South 13-5, with 6. 3·0 in E with S & M, who slipped by to all expectations as the match while in League B, Third Ryan Vermundah,12·9. • > developed into a see-saw battle early, maintained their undefeated slate at In Women's Independent, Ball and remained thrilling throughout, as 7 -0 by beating their relatives in Busters copped a forfeit from Gan " "Spotts menU... ' Second Harbin .surprised Volleyball Second Ryan, 8·3. dalf's Wizards to lead the Division at Team, 2·1. In Women's Dorm, Fourth Healy 6-1. BASEBALL: Friday, Randolph Macon, 3:00 p.r;':. Saturday, George Washington, 1:00 p.m. Lower Field Possibly Monday, at American, 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, at Delaware, 3:00 p.m. Thursday, at Maryland, 3: 00 To House New Area p.m. .Q CREW: Saturday, at St. Joseph's {Continued from page 101 '" feel that should an athletic plan be oo WOMEN'S CREW: Sunday, at 1. A definite plan of what agreed upon in the near future, it = GOLF: Friday, at Villanova, Georgetown needs. would most likely contain' plans for a a. 12:00 p.m. 2. A feasible means of raising the swimming pool. Georgetown Intramural Softball League play is in mid! 38S0n, with all races still undecided. LACROSSE: Saturday, at Vill~· money necessary . The 1971 Master Plan contained , nova, 12: 00 p.m. Lambert's main concern was in plans for a sports complex to be built "considering all possible alternatives" WOMEN'S LACROSSE: Friday, underneath Kehoe Field which is in trying to evaluate Georgetown's supported by easily removeable land· at Essex, 4:00 p.m. needs. He appointed a special sub fill. This has not been definitely Victory in Olympics Monday, Goucher, 4:30 p.m. committee of the board, chaired by ruled out as a possibility but there RUGBY: Saturday, Maryland, R. Emmett Curran, SJ, to view are potential other sites to be 12:30 p.m. facilities at other schools and to considered.on campus. . TENNIS: Friday, Catholic, 3:00 submit a report on their use by In the Master Plan, certain areas Not To Be Pushover p.m. students, quality, and possible incor· of the campus are reserved for Monday. at George Washing poration in future Georgetown varying types of facilities, the (Continued from page 101 punishing them for not having ton, 3:00 p,m. athletic projects. The report, to be extreme western end being that set was their lack of familiarity with chosen the correct university. Tuesday, at American, 3:30 delivered in May, will probably shed aside for recreation. Therefore, the each other's playing styles, as a result The role of an assistant is much p.m. some light on the possibility of the sites are limited to either Kehoe, the of the minimal practice time allotted. different than that of the head facility. lower field, or atop the parking lot This would be· alleviated by sending coach, and an adjustment, equal in WOMEN'S TENNIS: Monday, "We are in the most initial . tennis courts. the national champion, as their magnitude to the one the players Catholic, 3:30 p.m. planning stage," said Fr. Curran, "we ,nlll,rn1an James M. Lambert Another limiting factor will be the teamwork would be honed to a fine must make, will face Coach Thomp Tuesday, at American, 3:30 will be making some concrete sug· revealed shortly. zoning on height of buildings in the edge. This prospective solution, how· son. He commented, "I wouldn't p.m. gestions but there have been no Lambert feels that the biggest District. Approximately, no building ever, would affect recruiting, giving have accepted the position if I didn't TRACK {OUTDOOR I: Friday, decisions made yet." Fr. Curran problem in evaluating the needs of can be higher than the Healy the established basketball powers the have the utmost respect for Dean. Olympic Metric, Durham. N.C. noted that there had been some the University is keeping things in bUilding. AJ; a result any multi-level added advantage of dangling possible Since our coaching philosophies are Saturday, Daqund Relays, "promising developments" and that their proper perspective. "You can't complex would necessarily have to international exposure to high school largely the same, it shouldn't be too Knoxville, Tenn,. they were currently collating the ignor other cmapus problems," said start out on a lower level or be sunk prospects. It would also be unfair to difficult for me, but I couldn't do it data into presentable form to be the Physics professor. Lambert did underground considerably. many outstanding ballplayers, for anyone." ,1l~ sports Page 10 Complex To Hinge On Student Bucks by Chris Graham Georgetown's hopes for an all-purpose recreational sports facility are not as far-fetched as;manywould think_ It appears that the University's undertaking such a project will hinge largely on the students' willingness to pay for it_ Such a fa~ility, which at this point is only in the talking stage, would be financed much like a similar facility recently completed at Boston College_ BC's $5,000,000 complex was paid for by a combination of contributions and a student assessment which made up the difference between cost and funds. A questionnaire presently included in student pre-registration packets is sampling student reaction. The questionnaire from the Athletic Advisory Board contains many priority questions and is crucial to future athletic planning. Vice-President for Administrative Athletic Director, Francis Rienzo, Advisory Board under Dr. Lam Services Daniel J. Altobello stated: felt that the BC plan could work at bert." Lambert emphasized the fact "If we get a good response from Georgetown but noted that the that the Board was not about to students we will be able to start students should make the decision hand in any proposals but was still looking into feasible proposals. Right whether or not to take on that concerned with gathering more data now we are only in the very initial burden. Rienzo touched the nerve of on facilities and most importantly on . talking stages, but we want to move the problem of building a sports getting student input. "We have a fast on this. We don't wan t to build facility by stating, "it will have to fairly reasonable situation," said this in 1985, we want this building produce revenue." Lambert, "but we a,re not going out built quickly." The "pay as you go" principle is with a proposal. We are still looking As for now, the most difficult consistent with all University long for more information." question concerning the project is range planning. The concept here is Both AltobeUo and Lambert felt that of funding. Chairman of the that capital improvements be made that two basic requirements had to Athletic Advisory Board James L. without upsetting the cash-flow be met before any planning could Lambert said, "That will have to situation of the University. The begin: attempt to its 2-6 mark with home contests against Randolph Macon and George come from the administration." Darnall-Reiss townhouses are the (Continued on page 9) Washington today and tomorrow. start of such projects. Altobello explained that the Uni versity would keep any fund-raising of any kind for the sports facility under the "umbrella" of Mandate 81 Baseballers Drop Two of Three and that no individual effort would be made to raise funds for the by John Blake secorld win of the season. The field against Howard. The Bison iL" complex that were not consistent It has been quite a week for Jim following day at Loyola, the sopho- pulled away to a 6-1 lead off Dan Against Loyola on Tuesday, with the total plan. Armstrong. The Hoya third baseman, more cracked another long home run Chilson thanks to three Georgetown Georgetown took a 1-0 advantage in Fr. Henle, who will be passing on who was the team's leading hitter in to lead off the ninth inning and put errors in the third inning. But the the first inning on a single by the problem of building the sports the fall, collected five hits, six runs the Royas within a run. But a two Hoyas exploded for five runs in the Gallagher and a run-scoring double complex to his successor, is disap batted in and two home runs as out rally then fell short as George- fifth to tie the game. Singles by Brian by D'Ambrosio. The Greyhounds pOinted that such a facility was not Georgetown won one of three games. town lost a heartbreaker, 4-3. The Gallagher and Frank D'Ambrosio scored a run off Cordes in the built while he was president but said "Jimmy has really been hitting three game tear lifted Armstrong's drove in two runs before Armstrong bottom of the inning on a double ne t""\,,, that' ,we will definitely raise the ball and with power," com average to .448 with seven RBI's, hit a three-run blast, a line drive to steal and two more in the third on a the funds to eventually complete the mented coach Tommy Nolan. "All in. both team highs. right center field which rolled all the throwing error by Armstrong and a project." all, the team has not been playing "We have showed signs of really way down to the lower field. The looping single. The facility would be for general badly. We just have to put all the putting it together, but inconsistency Georgetown rally continued but The Hoyas closed the gap to one recreational use pointed out Alto facets of the game together." has hurt us," added Nolan, whose some stupid baserunning and an in the fifth when D'Ambrosio and bello. "It will-be for stUdents, not for Armstrong beganbisbjr)gILwith~1,l .1:il,:6:!).'edqy.J>.1!! ... .. sui'!erstars, "he ..added.· Curren tly .used. .'·-9;nt;rc .. " .... ~:,'"' .. ~.r.· f,U J:.a~L .C'.nutly.S 0:-0', . :th~~ AjelraFia~-fe-s;i;;tl1~ ft:rfci "arNl' ·····Hn,u~Hruh pl~y,",~l}p~.d,_·· AWJ§,9:gJ!~2tl!J.!W&.1¥!,d",G.lJ.n~. X~!.,'ti!l.P.-·- McDonough Gymnasium would be loss to Nichols. But the best was yet at the plate which must be over. After Howard regained'- the lead, who- se:m~ to have brolten hiS~~ll used for inter-collegiate play in to come, On Monday, he .blasted two come." 8-6 the Hoyas scored six more times slump, IS second to Armstrong WI h basketball and other sports. singles and a three run homer for in the sixth. aided by four walks, a an aver~ge of .379. Altobello attributed the present four runs batted in as Georgetown Those lapses were painfully evi- wild pitch" and a costly two-run B~t III ~he seventh Cordes ~ave up dent against Nichols. Georgetown r There were only two hits in the fIrst lut he. hll-p. allowed III four Vice-President Daniel Altobello situation to a "hard-working Athletic defeated Howard, 12~8 for their , built upa 5-0 lead in the first three ~~ro., 'ng a base' hit by Bob innings, but it was a costly one. Steve innings, including a four run third. H:dit~~~~ ~nd an RBI single by Cohill homered to right. fO.f what Nolan's use of his bench proved to be D'Ambrosio, who had two hits and would prove to be the wInnIng run effective as Bob Sherry and Rick three runS batted in. and a 4~2 le~d. A~strong, who had Scafa, both of whom have seen walked 111 hIS prevIous three at bats, Thompson To Aid US limited action this season, contri- Chilson walked the first two homered to lead off the ninth. Base buted key RBI's in that inning. batters in the top of the seventh and hits by Verdino and John Zeitler But then the roof fell in. With two Brew came on to relieve him. The with two out gave the Hoyas life, but out in the fourth, Georgetown starter lefty faced just ten men the rest of Scafa struck out to end the game. Jay Brew gave up a pair of singles. the way as the Hoyas won for the "It was a tough loss but I felt In Drive for Gold Medal However, he appeared to be out of second time in three outings. Blane pitched very well after the inning when the next batter "We took advantage of Howard's throwing on Friday," commented by Bob Labriola Hank Iba, the relic from Okla For example, even a player of Adrian grounded to third. But Armstrong mistakes for this victory," said Nolan. "Judging from our iast three John Thompson came to George homa State and the only other Dantley's caliber will have to make bobbled the ball to load the bases Nolan. "We also got some timely performances, I think we are ready town University with the arduous Olympic coach prior to Smith's some adjustments in order to make and set the stage for Gary Burna. pitching and hitting when we needed to win some ballgames." task of molding a winning basketball selection, observed the trials, but had the squad." Phil Sellers, All Buma sent a hanging curve ball into team, from a group of unproven no direct hand in them. Thompson American from Rutgers, even prior the graveyard in feft-center field and freshmen along with the tattered commented, "Hank Iba was often to his anemic performance in the crossed the plate as the ball was still NCAA Tournament, was a question Women Scholarships; remains of a squad bearing the wrongly criticized for the selection rolling. Instead of being out of the ignominious distinction of having process, even though he had nothing able Olympic member because of his inning, four unearned runs were logged the worst record, 3-23, in to do with it." performance at the tryout for the home and the Hoyas' lead had been Georgetown history. In an effort to eradicate future Pan American Games. cut to5-4, Maybe Next Semester Four years, 64 wins, two ECAC Lexingtons, the selection process for The coaching staff realizes the Brew's arm tightened in the fifth by Sylvall Sobel crowns and two NCAA Tournament Montreal has been drastically revised. challenge involved in regaining the and freshman Blane Cordes came on Women's athletics at Georgetown may be the recipient of twelve appearances later, John Thompson The country has been divided into gold medal. "The United States is in the sixth. Cordes ran into trouble scholarships next year. According to Athletic Advisory Board Chairman Dr. adds an international flavor to the regions, with each sector having its going into Montreal as underdogs in the seventh when he was tagged James A. Lambert, a recommendation will be made next weel: by the Board Hilltop by being named assistant own Regional Representative. This even though most people think we for a double and then a single to tie that the Main Campus Finance Committee allow the Athletic Department to coach to the Olympic Basketball individual is responsible for inviting are invincible," Thompson said. the game. Nichols won the game in offer grants in aid to a dozen deserving female athletes. "'{,his is definitely not a rubber team. Along with head coach Dean players to the Olympic trials, held the ninth when Kevin Codx reached Funds to be used for the women's in the direction of improving the Smith, Thompson hopes to restore the week of May 30 in Greensboro, stamped victory, but I look upon it on shortstop Tom Williams' error, scholarships will come partly from women's program. the US as gold-medalists, following N.C. Marshall Emory, Athletic Direc as a special challenge, and we're not stole second, and scored on Dave money formerly used to provide Additional funds will be obtained the larceny which took place in tor at Howard University, is the going there to lose." Hackenson's basehit, Georgetown grants to baseball players. When the through cuts in both the basketball Munich in 1972. region II representative, which in The major crux which has hin stranded three runners in the' final baseball scholarships were phased and track budgets, probably in the Thompson is no stranger to the cludes the DC Metropolitan area. A dered the United States in the past two frames. out, one of the provisions was that number of ,scholarships which they Olympic process, having been invited total of sixty players will participate (Continued on page 9) There were again problems in the the money lost would be put to use each receive. to the tryouts at Lexington, Ken in the tryouts. Certainly, the women's program tucky in 1964. At that time, because Contrary to popular belief, has improved over the last several of the impotent competition at the graduating. seniors are going to be years. Due largely to Title IX Olympics, the selection process was considered for tryout nominations, legislation, which provides for largely politically oriented. The AAU as are the European players. In fact, women to receive proportionate, but was guaranteed two positions on the as Coach Thompson stated, "Tile not equal spending in the way of Squad, as was the NCAA, NAIA, the NBA and ABA use the Olympic trials overall athletic expenditures, institu Armed Forces and the Industrial as a basis for their scouting. Since the tions have been forced to upgrade Leagues. What ensued was that not Olympics are relatively early in the the quality of female athletic pm all of the invitees were given an equal summer, there's no reason why the grams, opportunity to prove their ability. kids can't play and still be ready for This final decision should prove a As a result, George Wilson, a member the start of the season." boon to women's sports at the of the AAU, made the team instead Throughout the week of the Hilltop, and serves as the CUlmination of such stalwarts of basketball circles tryout, the players will be evaluated of a drastic improvements of what as Rick Barry, Billy Cunningham, by the nominating panel of judges, was virtually a non-existent part of Willis Reed and Jerry Sloan. . which will not include Smith or the Georgetown sports scene not too Coach Thompson recalled the Thompson. In fact, neither of the long ago. experience vividly, "It was an ex coaches are permitted to know who No decision has yet been made on tremely frustrating experience, but I has been invited until the first day of how to allot the scholarships. They guess they could guarantee those camp. As Thompson elaborated; can either be divided in such a way positions because the European "The only think I know is that my so that each sport will be able to teams were not that strong." In players have told me that they have recruit one or two top performers in cluded in the "they" were Jack not received any invitations. As far as their own sport, or they can simply Gardner, then head coach at Dart the selection process goes, Dean and ge given to twelve top female mouth, Slatts Gill and Adolph Rupp, I have nothing to say about that athletes. I self-proclaimed Legend of Lexington. either. But, J feel that since Dean was As of now, it looks as though the Thompson continued, "The 1964 chosen as head coach, they will Advisory Board will recommend that trials was the first time I met John select players who would not have a Volleyball be the sport upon which Wooden. He had just won the first of difficult time fitting into the Smith they concentrate, allowing the other that incredible string of National system." sports to benefit to a somewhat Thompson maintains' a coach's smaller degree. Championships, an'd consequently six The wome,l'S volleyball squad of his players were invited to try out. attitude about the selection process. "The United States is not looking for participatedin the Eastern regional Following one of the sessions, which tournament this past fall at Southern proved particularly depressing, he an all-star team; they'll be looking to choose a genuine team. This includes Connecticut State College. Although told me that the selection process they do not receive scholarships, was not providing everyone with an having players capable of sitting on the bench and being ablt to step onto they qualified as one of the top equal shot at making the team. His sixteen teams in the 11S-team region. final comment was, 'All I know is, the court with confidence and o By giving grant-in-aid to the volley they'd better take Walter (Haz contribute. Many top-rate ballplayers r. a. ball team the University will attempt zard).' " Hazzard went on to play an cannot emotionally handle this. The " to receive recognition on the national public could be very surprised when Coach John Thompson will spend part of his summer in Montreal as the assistant basketball coach for the US Olympic integral part in the conquest at level. Tokyo. the Olympic team is finally selected_ coach for the US Olympic team. FallCoulseCtitique. Results The reading assignments, though quite difficult and extensive, were always Business Statistics Responses: .93 pertinent to the material at hand. Professor Winkler Blo109Y· There were three tests plus the identification of three unknown organisms This professor is recommended as being an enthusiastic teacher. He has an for lab. The exams were often too picky but grading was average as far as excellent command of the material. He conveys the subject in such a way as Comparative Animal Behavior Responses: 15 out of 25 fairness is concerned. to make the required course somewhat less boring than usual. He makes the . Professor Barrows - Most students had difficulty with the enormous amount of material course interesting, according to the respondents. The worldoad consisted of 2 ','l\{oststudents agreed that the professor had excellent knowledge of the .covered in lecture and the speed at which it was delivered but they tests and a final. The grading was fair but o~ten hard. subject matter and transmitted it efficiently to the students. Professor recommended it to serious biology students interested in imniunology and . Barrows "took an active part in making class interesting and understandable" bacteriology. The course was considered especially good for those pursuing a Business Statistics Responses: 100 and was always available for consultation. Assignments were considered very medical career. The professor's overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 3.48. Professor Domer interesting and the labs were particularly stimulating. This professor was recommended as having good knowledge and The_exams, of which there were three, were thought provoking but quite General Physiology Responses: 51 out of 75 conveyance of the material. Grading was deemed to be fair of the 2 tests and fair. Graduate students were responSible 'for a lab project. Professor Pancake final. This courSe was highly recommended ue to the combination of biology Professor Pancake seemed to have a good command of the material and psychology it· provided. Enjoyable field trips added to the enrichment of covered in the course but was often vague and unsure of himself in his Business Statistics Responses: 17 course material. The professor':s overall rating on the scale from 1 to 4 was presentation. Very sympathetic and understanding of his students, the Professor Droms 3.25. . professor was' always available outside of class in his office. The outside Teacher was recommended as having excellent command of the material reading assignments were particularly helpful in clarifying lecture material but and its conveyance to the students. The professor brought in examples to Introduction to Biology Responses: 87 out of 181 most complained about the value and relevance of the textbook. make the course interesting. Fair examinations and grading of 2 tests and Professor Bauer Two lecture tests, lab write·ups, two lab tests, and a lecture final final. Professor Bauer knew his material "inside and out" and except for comprised the workload. Exams were usually fair although at times seemed to occasional confusing points conveyed it well to the students. He could be emphasize points that were not considered to be very important. Grading was Law and Society Responses: 33 reached at any time outside of class and was genuinely interested in his more than fair. Professor Tendler' students. The majority of the class felt the assignments were pertinent to the A requirement for biology majors, it was recommended as a good Many students felt that the material of the course was rather dry and lecture material yet many found that the lab material didn't coincide with the integration of previous biology courses even though it was quite general. The tedious. The professor spent a lot of time laboring on very small points which lecture too often. professor's overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 2.71. many thought made the course move very slowly. The workload consisted of There were four lecture tests, 'one of which was dropped, a final, two lab two tests and a take home final. Professor Tendler was well-liked and tests, and a lab practical, all of which were representative of the material Thermobiology Responses: 8 out of 11 respected as a teacher. , covered. Grades were most definitely fair. Professor Robinson Enjoyed by all who took the course, it was highly recommended on the Professor Robinson was "well organized, interesting, and well motivated" Business Law Responses: 30 basis of the vast amount of informative material covered and the relevance of and effectively transmitted the material to the students. All students said the Professor Kamber the material to everyone interested in learning about life. The professor's professor seemed to love teaching the course and was always available to help Professor Kamber was well liked by all respondents and recommended overall rating on the scale from 1 to 4 was 3.61. ' anyone outside of' class. The asSignments were invariably interesting and highly. The workload of the course was made up of cases and problems to be pertinent to the material at hand. handed in at the end of the semster, two open book tests, and a take home Biological Concepts Responses: 21 out of 34 There was a mandatory term paper, a midterm, and a final for the final. The subject matter was found very interesting and the assignments very Professor Bick semester. Both tests and grading were very fair. rel.evant. The instructor is always willing to discuss with students but he Professor Bick had a good command of the lecture material but some had This. course was highly recommended to anyone in the biology department sometimes is difficult to find, since he is not a full·time professor. trouble with the confusing nature of her presentation at trimes. The professor because it was interesting, challenging, and stimUlating. The professor's was available by appointment and radiated much enthusiasm when helping overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 3.74. Law and Society Responses: 45 the students. Assignments consisted of chapter readings and helped explain Professor Kamber the lecture material. Ecology Responses: None The course workload was made up of the two tests, a final, and regular Workload was comprised of three tests for the semester, one lab per week Professor Spoon assignments; all of them were found to be difficult but interesting. Generally, plus a lab quiz, and a lab project. Tests were usually picayune but grading was the course was recommended by the respondents; the material was found for the most part fair. stimulating and worthwhile yet very difficult. , The course was recommended as a good way to fulfill a math/science requirement. It demanded a lot of work and study on one's own time. The Principles of Marketing Responses: 31 professor's overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 2.88. Business Professor Bushman The format of Professor Bushman's course has been basically lecture and Endocrinology Responses: 17 out of 26 Financial Accounting I Responses: 48 discussion. The professor allows for stUdent discussion and a seminar type atmosphere. The workload consisted of two exams, and three group projects Professor Blanquet Professor Houston Excellent in both his knowledge of the material and his effectiveness as a A class held in lecture format. This class is highly recommended by all which were made up of one case, one concept, and one project. The professor was found to have a good command of his material and displayed enthusiasm lecturer, Professor Blanquet was quite enthusiastic about teaching the course. 'because of the excellence of the professor. He has considerable command Students agreed that he was always available if one needed to see him. over the material and effectively conveys it to his classes. Examinations are towards the course. The material was found interesting by most students and the course has generally recommended, despite a heavy work load. Most Though the text was considered to be very difficult, an excellent bibliography hard and quite fair. was provided which helped clarify lecture topics. respondents agreed that the only reservation they had in recommending the class was that it relied very heavily on group work and projects. There were three tests given during the semester, along with lab reports Financial Accounting I Responses: 42 which were written up in groups. Thorough command of the subject matter Professor Mintz Social Responsibilities of Business Responses: 28 was expected on the tests and 'grading was always fair. 99% of the responses were the same, that the professor's greatest asset was Professor Nollen The course was strongly recommended due to Professor Blanquet's clear, that he was able to convey his good command of the subject matter so well. This course is required for all SBA students. It deals with a wide variety of concise lecture style, his consideration for the students, and the interesting There were 2 tests and a final. He had an excellent attitUde and was available social issues with which many students are unfamiliar. nature of the material. The professor's overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4 to the students. was 3.77. Dr. Nollen's course is executed in a basically lecture/discussion format. The workload is made up of 3 of 5 required papers and a research paper. The Financial Accountin I Responses: 17 material was found to be very interesting at times and rather "slow" at other Cytology and Histology Responses: 61 out of 105 Professor Smith Professor Chapman times. The grading was extremely strict and some stUdents felt that Dr. The responses were mostly negative in nature. However, there were two Nollen wanted the stUdents to write what he wanted to hear. The choice of Professor Chapman's command of the material was described as for this. This certain class met at 7: 15 a.m. Also, the professor was reasons three papers out of five was found as an asset to the course because this way . "astonishing" and his presentation was extremely coherent,. Since he is employed at another job and therefore was often unavailable. Otherwise the the student could choose the material with which he had.to work on and chairman. of the _qepartment, his. time \.Yas limited but Professor Chapman . professor had good command of the material and sometimes had trouble write about. always made an effort to be available for consultation. "It was obvious that conveying it. The professor did improve with time. he loved the material and was interested in his students." There were no In recommending the course 50% of the respondents agreed that Dr. actual reading assignments for the cout~e. Most found that lab complemented Intermediate Accounting Responses: 56 Nollen had superior control of his material and was interested and aware of the lecture very well. Professor Lemoine his stUdents needs. The course was generally found valuable and a good Three non-cumulative lecture tests and two lab practicals comprised the This class was held in lecture format. The professor had very good educational experience. workload. Each covered the material presented extensively, and were very command of the material, however, the conveyance was often shadowed by straight forward. disorganization at times in presentation of the material. Workload consisted Social Responsibilities of Business Responses: 16 Although most people had trouble with the professor's rapidity in his of 2 tests and a final accompanied by weekly homework. For the most part, Professor Herzog presentation many described the course as the best given at Georgetown. The this course was recommended by most responses. The professor had excellent This class is a requirement for SBA students, you'll have to take it some professor's overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 3.75. attitude. time. Most of the students who responded agreed that the professor had a good command of the material, which was sometimes rather technical. The Plant Virology Responses: 8 out of 9 Intermediate Accounting Responses: 48 workload was composed of one paper, oral group presentations and a large Professor Chen Professor Mintz amount of reading. There are no exams, a fact which most students thought Rated as excellent in both his knowledge of the field and his ability to Professor Mintz is recommended as a teacher because of an excellent was a drawback. The respondent:; felt that the professor wasn't getting convey the' material, Professor Chen projected a very good attitude toward command of material and conveyance. Worldoad consists of 2 tests and a adequate feedback from the students with just the paper. the course. He was always available jf one needed to speak with him outside final complemented by homework assignments. Generally the respondents agreed that Dr. Herzog was available if you need of class. The asSignments were both relevant and stimulating. to see him. Tests consisted of a midterm and a final. In addition to these, a lab Advanced Accounting Responses: 52 notebook was kept and a lab project done. Both the midterm and the final Professor Lemoine Market Management Responses: 30 were representative of the course material and extremely fair. The professor is recommended so far as having a good Imowledge of the Professor Scharles This course was recommended on the basis of Professor Chen's material, good attitude toward the course and students_ The course was noted Dr. Scharles' course was enthusiastically recommended because of the encouraging attitude and his interest in the students. The professor's overall itself because of a poor text. The op.ly other criticism was that the prof could instructors attitude toward his material and his students. His experience in rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 3.55. have been better prepared at times. the marketing field was said to be a great asset to the course, it also helped to supplement the text and readings. The assignments were generally found Environmental Zoology Responses: 33 out of 47 Accounting for Non·Business Majors Responses: 56 stimulating and interesting. The workload was made up of 2 exams, a final Professor Eagles Professor Houston project, and 10 periodical reviews. The exams were multiple choice, and were Professor Eagles undoubtedly had solid command of the subject matter This course was most highly recommended for both its value and the found to be fair, but most students agreed that they were difficult because of and for the most part conveyed it well. Most students commented, though, professor. Mr. Houston was considered as the best teacher many of the the "multiple choice" questions which allowed for little feedback. The course on occasional problems with his delivery of the lecture material. Practically respondents had taken at Georgetown. was recommended for all. It was termed by one student as "a great learning any time one needed to see the professor he was available and seemed eager experience." to help. ASSignments, especially lab write-ups, were stimulating and Intermediate Accounting Responses: 27 Business Financial Management Responses: 82 appropriate for the lecture material. Professor Fekrat Yehuda Atai There were two essay tests, an essay type final, and three or four lab This course was basically lecture with some discussion. The professor was B.F.M. is a required course for all Business School students. It is not an reports for the semester., The tests, though at times a bit too lengthy and not noted for his excellent command of the material but several students easy course. The workload consisted of two exams and two cases. The always representative of the subject matter, were graded rigidly. mentioned difficulty in understanding the explanations of concepts. majority of students felt the professor's attitude towards them was poor. Most people recommended the course to those interested in physiological He was available to students and showed a good attitude to his course. The Many stated that there was a problem with his conveyance of the material zoology and ecological problems. The labs were considered to be some of the workload consisted of three tests and a final, on which the grading was fair. which enhanced the difficulty of the subject matter. The professor had a good best ever experienced at Georgetown. The professor's overall rating on a scale The class recommended this course to accounting majors mainly, but some command of the material, however, although the textbook appeared to be the from 1 to 4 was 3.44 noted that the teacher should give more difficult tests as they did not feel main factor in pulling many students through the course. Overall, the challenged. majority of students gave this course a poor to fair rating. Developmental Biology and Vertebrate Embryology Responses: 11 out of 21 Professor Norr Advanced Accounting Responses: 12 Principles of In\it:;~tment Responses: 62 Extremely well versed in his field, Professor Norr conveyed the material Professor Skigen Professor DroOlS well except for occasionally when certain topics were somewhat vague. The . '. Profess.or Skigen used a lecture and discussion format for this course. Pri nciples of Investment describes the financial markets and the theories' of professor was always available to' help his students and displayed 'a genuine Students feel that he has an excellent command of the material and most felt investment. This course could not have had higher or more enthusiastic concern for them. The assignments given were always appropriate and the same about his conveyance of this knowledge. He was thought to have a recommendations. The course is taught on a lecture format. Requirements somewhat stimulating for the stUdents. good attitude toward the course and be readily available. consisted of two exams (midterm and final) and one term paper. Professor Workload was comprised of a midterm and a final in both lecture and lab The assignments, which were both fair and relevant, were composed of Droms was very interesting and applied theories to practical problems in an and there were lab reports which were to be turned in. Though the exams weekly homeward, a midterm and a final. Most students rated Mr. Skigen effective manner. The only suggestion made by students was for a more were extremely comprehensive, they were usually fair and grading was qUite highly and recommended his course. A few responses mentioned a tendency structured format to the lectures. This suggestiong, however, was minor. On stringent. to go off the subject too much. the whole, Dr. Droms received an excellent rating by all of his students. This course was recommended to those who could devote a great deal of time to it and those interested in developmental biology. The professor's Cost Accounting Responses: 42. Production Management Responses: 22 overall rating 013 a scale from 1 to 4 was 3.42. Professor Fe krat Professor Domer Professor Fekrat received positive critiques from two classes of cost The majority of the respondents agreed that Dr. Dorner had superior Comparative Anatomy Responses: 18 out of 23 accounting students. The format is lecture and problem solving with the command of his material and was very effective in conveying his knowledge. Professor O'Keefe teacher demonstrating a good command of the material and a good attitude Dr. Domer was always prepared for his class, and was very enthusiastic and Most students felt Professor O'Keefe had excellent mastery of the course toward the course. Several students thought the teacher had difficulties cooperative. The workload was composed of two midterms (one which was material and in general was able to transmit it well. At times, though, the conveying the knowledge. ' optional), a final exam, and 5 homeword problems to be collected. The professor passed too quickly over difficult material. Described as "always There were two tests, a final and homework problems; tests were assignments were found worthwhile and the exams were characterized as fair. available and always in demand," the professor took much pride in the considered comprehensive but fair. The professor was mainly given very high Most of the respondents recommended the course highly, yet it was noted course. The readings were generally interesting and relevant although some ratings. r that the material was rather technical and unless you enjoy it, it can become felt too much was covered in such a short space of time. rather dry. As one respondent put it, "I recommend this course without There were four non-cumUlative tests, and two oral lab practicals on Taxation I Responses: 52 hesitation to anyone who enjoys mathematical models for business dissections. The examinations were usually fair although at times did not Professor Skigen , application, otherwise I don't think they would like it." represent material covered specifically in lecture. Professor Skigen's background as an accountant and tax profeSSional is Most students had trouble with the fast pace of the lecture but cited by many students as the reason for his excellent command of the Human Relations in Management Responses: 18 recommended the course to those interested in an enormous workload and subject matter. Several students commented that he sometimes has Prof. Scharles learning a great deal of anatomy and physiology. The professor's overall difficulties conveying this knowledge to students. He was available to The class was found to give the stUdents a great deal of insight into the rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 3.74. students and most thought he had a good attitude toward the class. problems of management. It was carried on in a lecture-discussion format and The workload included a midterm, final, research project and weekly the students agreed that the professor was usually accessible and very helpful. Microbiology Responses: 31 out of 39 homework problems. Mr. Skigen was considered fair in grading. Numverous The professor required 10 short papers, 2 research papers, and an oral Professor O'Keefe responses stated that this course was for a very serious student as it moves final, all of which are found to be stimulating and fair. Professor O'Keefe was quite knowledgeable in the course material yet he very quickly and the student must do a lot of work on his own. Due to the Most students recommended the course for anyone in the business school sped through his lectures much too fast. The professor seemed to really love complexity of the subject matter, the course is recommended for accounting or for anyone with plans of becoming, involved in business. It gave a very teaching the course and made himself available for questions outside of class. majors (requirement) or those students with a very active interest in tax. fresh perspective to the material because the class was carried on basically Page 5-2 The HOYA Friday, April 9, 1976 discussion format. Student participation was found to be very important in scaie from 1 to 4 was 2.97 .. supplemental reading book, both of which were seen of as relevant to the the course. lectures. There were two tests and a final. The tests were all objective, though Organic Chemistry I Resptmses:.20 out of 118 they tended to be rather long. They were graded fairly, according to a M.I.S. Responses: 29 Professor Hammer :majority of the students. The final was nor cummulative if one had an A Professor Atai Professor Hammer, considered an expert in his knowledge of the material, :average on the first two tests. A vast majority of the students in the course M.l.S. is a required course for the Business School. It is basically a study of wl!S generally believed to be ineffective as a lecturer. Lectures were often 'recommended Professor Voss unconditionally, even· to those who dislike computers from the management viewpoint in the practical, but mostly disorganized and rambling. Whenever he could be found though, Professor 'economics. theoretical sense. On the whole most students felt it to be rather vague at Hammer was helpful in answering questions. His attitude was somewhat . times. The professor had a good command of the material but his method of aloof, but generally positive toward the course. Macro Theory Responses: 80· conveyance was also rather vague at times. The workload consisted of four There were three tests, each worth 20%, and one final worth 40% for the Professor Dobriansky papers and a final exam. The papers seemed to be generally more beneficial semester. Each test was considered extremely difficult but grading was more Professor Dobriansky had an excellent command of the ,material. The than the exam. than fair. presentation of it was done with humour and savoy, although many students . Many felt the course on the whole was not terribly interesting but felt the This course is a requirement for pre-meds and chemistry majors and it w~ thought them to be rather complicated. He was approachable immediately material was important. Some recommended it but many did not. On the overwhelmingly not recommended otherwise. The professor's overall rating after class, but was rarely to be found during his office hours. I:Iis attitude whole, Professor Atai received a fair to good rating. on a scale from 1 to 4 was 2.55. was good towards the course: he seemed to enjoy 'teaching very much. The workload consisted of readings from a textbook and a supplement book. M.I.S. Responses: 23 Synthesis of Organic Compounds Responses: 8 out of 10 Opinion was divided evenly concerning' the difficulty and relativity of the Professor Griesel Professor Horak readings. There were two tests, a mid tenn and a final, which were seen as Professor Griesel's section of M.I.S. was highly recommended by all of his Professor Horak showed a tremendous knowledge of the material and difficult but graded very fairly on the average. As far as impriving the course students. His approach was found to be interesting and stimulating. The conveyed it in an ',easily understandable manner." Available at all times both is concerned, students' opinion ranged from getting .better texts and workload consisted of three papers and a final exam. Again the students during and outside of class, the professor displayed a very positive attitude improving lectures to drawing better diagrams. Still others thought that the reiterated the vagueness of some of the theoretical problems of M.I.S. but toward the course and "shared his enthusiasm for organic chemistry with the "Dobbes" could not be improved upon. The course was recommended to . found Professor Griesel's presentation effective. Grading tended to be strict in students." other students by most. Professor Dobiransky's humor and personality made a few cases. Overall, Professor Griesel received a very good rating by his Assignments were indeed stimulating and relevant. Workload consisted of the subject material come alive, according to most. students. lab projects, keeping a lab notebook, and a five minute oral presentation of one's work. to the class. Macro Theory Responses: 12 M.I.S. Responses: 23 Recommended for those with a "strong interest in organic synthesis," the Professor Tryon Professor DuPeza course was believed to be useful for those in pursuit of any interest in . Most students were unable to detennine whether or not Professor Tryon Jules DuPeza has an excellent command of the material and has great chemistry. The professor's overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4. was 3.95. had good command of the material, since he was unable to convey it to the interest in his students. The workload consisted of a midterm and a final. students. His lectures were seen as boring and "disjointed." The professor was Many felt that a working knowledge. of computer terms, etc. was necessary to General Chemistry Responses: 30 out of 138 available to his students; his office hours were regularly mentioned in class. understand the subject matter. Consequently, much of the material was a bit Professor Kumar He also showed interest in the course material. There were two midtenns and difficult to grasp at times. Many of his students therefore, did not get a whole Most students felt Professor Kumar had excellent command of the a final, which were graded fairly. The material covered in the tests came lot out of the course. Overall, however, Professor DuPeza received a good material but most had trouble understanding his presentation due to his exclusively from the textbook and assorted readings. Many found these to be rating. heavy accent. Professor Kumar was not available outside of class but the not stimulating,a1though more so than his lectures. A fair amount of students Responses: 23 teaching assistants were helpful in this respect. He had a good attitude toward thought that the professor could improve by organizing class time as well as the courSe. his lectures. 90% of the stUdentS stated they would not recommend this Business Policy Responses: 35 It was generally agreed that the assignments were for the most part course section. Professor Whittaker stimulating and at times even helpful in understanding the materialpresented Dr. Whittaker was cited for his knowledge and good understanding of the in class. There were three tests, lab reports, weekly quizzes, and a final. The International Economics Responses: 33 material. A fairly common comment was, "I often felt that I didn't know tests were considered to be fair and representative of the material at hamd, Professor Ruff exactly what he was looking for." The stUdents were very impressed with his yet quizzes were very unfair. Professor Ruff had good command of the material, but the general concern. "Anyone who can teach this stuff for six hours straight has to be This course is required for nursing students. Half of the class concensus was that he could not· convey it effectively. He had difficulty dedicated." recommended this course for people interested in chemistry whereas the lecturing in an organized fashion. He did seem to be available to students and The course is based on case studies, basically a lecture and discussion other half did not advise taking the cotlrse due to the professor's inability to also had a good attitude towards the course .. There were four tests and a final. format. There were about five class quizzes and three case write·ups (8-10 transmit his'ideas. Professor Kumar's overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was Opinion was divided concerning the fairness of the tests although most pages). The students basically seemed to like Dr. Whittaker very much but 2.33. students thought that the tests were graded too harshly and arbitrarily. complained about the 2%·hour class session. Another criticism was that the T.A. was used to give a number of lectures and Biochemistry Responses: 16 out of 25 to explain graphs. It was also felt that the professor should have placed less Business Policy Responses: 79 Professor Kumar emphasis on the theoretical aspect than on the historical. Students Professor Babcock Generally considered to be knowledgeable in the lecture material, recommended the professor only if one had a deep interest in the course. Dr. Babcock's lecture and discussion format for Business Policy rated well Professor Kumar was disorganized in his presentation. If one needed to with his students. His manner of tying outside experiences to the course is consult with him, he was usually available and his attitude was a positive one. Economic Statistics Responses: 24 cited with regard to his knowledge of the material and attitude. Both were Examinations were relatively fair in content and reflective of the subject Professor Primus considered vfo)ry good. matter. Grading was "a bit rigorous'" though. A mid-tern and final comprised Most students felt that Professor Primus had a good command of the Case studies provided the basis for six short papers and one long tenn the workload. material but it was agreed that he did not communicate the material well in paper. Some students did not feel there was enough grading feedback as the If one enjoys biochemistry, it is recommended they take this course. The lectures. He received compliments on his attitude towards the course and papers were marked Excellent, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, etc. professor's overall rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 2.78. towards the students. Some of the criticisms were aimed at his use of The professor was recommended enthusiastically by most of his students, prepared notes and his inability to effectively answer questions in class being .called "one of the best professors in Georgetown's Business School." Physical Chemistry Responses: 7 out of 35 though he received compliments for being especially helpful in his office and Professor Martire in labs. His exams and assignments were considered fair and helpful by almost Transportation Responses: 17 Professor martire exhibited an excellent knowledge of the subject matter all. He was also criticized for only correcting some of the homework Professor Hymson and lectured in a clear, relaxed manner allowing for students' questions at all problems and basing the mark on that sample. More organized use of the The course was found to be very interesting and the professor was times. When he could be found, the professor was helpful to his students. He blackboard and larger writing were common suggestions for improvement. recommended highly. Students were impressed with the instructor's seemed to enjoy teaching the course very much and wanted the students to Most students would not recommend this course. 121 is required of knowledge and his ability to convey ideas effectively. There were two exams, sufficiently comprehend the material. economics majors in the college, though one student wrote, "I might suggest both were found fair and applied to the lectures and assignments. Students Assignments were quite relevant and always excited one's interest. There another professor." enjoyed the guest lectures which were brought into class. . were three extremely fair tests and problems due about every two weeks Despite the recommendations, most stUdents added that the course was during the semester. Grading was generous also. Public Finance Responses; 15 difficult and they recommended it to serious students who would be The course is a requirement for chemistry majors, but it was most Professor Primus interested in the field. One student stated: "The course can be interesting to certainly recommended to physics and math majors and people interested in Professor Primus' command of the material was average, as he often the right students, however the large amounts of regulatory reading tends to integrating mathematical analysis with chemistry. Professor Martire's overall lectured straight out of an open textbook during class. Even so, his lectures be overbearing at times." rating on a scale from 1 to 4 was 3.66. were not clear. At times the professor himself lost track of the material. Most :,- ".,; . .'., students felt that his strongest point was his availability, although they also Intetq~'lolJal Busil]ess ,Responses: 39 considered that he·was not very helpful in his office either. Se~en aSsignments Professor Park ,:; in the form of'150-word essays weretobe;;h'arided iii. Mbst';students stated :In a business world which has become and is still becoming much more Economics that they profited from these assignments, though they were not weighed international, the business student needs to get a good background in this· heavily enough in the final grading. There was a midterm and a final. These Responses: 39 field so that his perspective will be complete. A majority of the respondents Microeconomics tests were seen as being ambiguous and the grading hard: Professor Primus felt that Professor Park was very well prepared to teach the material and his Professor Paik could improve by becoming more proficient in the subject matter and presentation was very interesting, The format of the course was mostly Professor Paik has a good mastery of economics, however, students feel organizing his lectures. 85% of the class would not recommend this course to lecture and the workload consisted of one final exam. Most students felt that she has difficulty expressing herself in English, and conveying her knowledge. anyone. having only one exam was a drawback to the course. The professor was The professor was always available to students, prefering to see them during helpful to students but was difficult to contact sometimes since he is not a office hours rather than encouraging questions in class. Her lectures were Microeconomics Responses: 39 full-time professor. The course was recommended highly: one student called detailed and some felt she covered the material too slowly. The relatively Professor Paik it, "A very broadening experience." light work load consisted of three homework assignments, judged relevant but Professor Paik has a good mastery of economics, however, students feel dull, readings, two midterms and a final. Exams covered the subject matter she has difficulty expressing herself in English, and conveying her knowledge. Organizational Analysis . Responses: 63 and grades were fair. Most students recommended the course as a good The professor was always available to students, prefering to see them during introduction to economics, and praised the professor's attitude. Others Professor Herzog office hours rather than encouraging questions in class. Her lectures were Arnold Herzog's students all agreed on his superior knowledge of the criticized the lecture format which did not allow for enough discussion or detailed, and some felt she covered the material too slowly. The relatively material. The course was conducted on a lecture/discussion format. application of concrete exam pies to the abstract theory. They also would light work load consisted of three homework assignments, judged relevant but Requirements consisted of two case studies and a final term paper. Although have preferred a more organized and dynamic approach. dull, readings, two midterms, and a final. Exams covered the subject matter all agreed that the material covered was relevant, Professor Herzog's manner and grades were fair. Most students recommended the course as a good Responses: 45 of conveying it seemed to be a little lacking. The readings for the course were Microeconom ics introduction to economics, and praised the professor's attitude. Others voluminous. Professor Brannon criticized the lecture format which did not allow for enough discussion 'or The major discussion (complaint for some) was Professor Herzog's method Professor Barnnon was judged as having an excellent command 'of the application of concrete examples to the abstract theory. They also would of grading. No actual grades were given just feedback on the cases. For many material at hand, although the general concensus was that he had difficulty in have prefered a more organized and dynamic approach. grade conscious students (most of them) this caused great problems. Others conveying it to the students. His extensive knowledge in the field of. however, enjoyed the class and learned for what it was worth. Overall Arnold government policy and taxation seemed most attuned towards an upper level economics course than the principles of micro. He was very available, even Herzog received a fair to good rating. beyond office hours. The work load consisted of weekly workbool, problems Physics Organizational Analysis Responses: 45 to be handed in as well as readings in the text. The workbook asSignments were deemed very difficult as well as irrelevant to many students, though Professor Ross Fundamental Physics Responses: 40 Organizational Analysis stUdies human behavior in the context of some found them helpful. There were two tests and a final, which were graded qUite fairly. The professor's attitude towards the course was excellent. Professor Leopold organizations. Ms. Ross's course was highly recommended by the majority of The course consisted of lectures, supplemented by a recitation period. The her students. The format consisted of both lectures and discussion. Almost everyone thought that the professor could improve by making his lectures more interesting: they tended to be on the boring side. Professor workload was considered heavy, with five tests, a final and weekly Veda Ross definitely knows her material and her method of teaching, homework. Dr. Leopold had a good command of the material but had although sometimes unconventional, was for the most part an interesting Brannon's personality must have shown through though, for many students described him as being a "very nice guy" and a "cool dude." . difficulty conveying it to his students. His attitude was judged excellent and learning experience. The workload consisted of case studies, papers, tests, etc. he was very interested in his students. He was always available for help if it The student chose his/her own method. The only complaint was that all the was needed. But there were several main complaints about the course. The work was due at the end of the semester which many of the students found a . Microeconom ics Responses: 64 Professor Zrinyi assignments were considered very difficult and judged to be of little help, little too intense. Overall, Ms. Ross received high recommendations from all only causing confusion. The tests were not considered fair, chiefly because the students. What a student put into it, is what he/she got out of it. Father Zrinyi was recommended very highly by an overwhelming majority of the students who took his course. He has an excellent command of the they were not related to the homework or the lectures. Dr. Leopold also did not explain the material very well and he was considered too theoretical in his Management of Financial I nstitutions Responses: 23 material, and conveys it with great facility, although some students felt that he tended to cram too much information into his lectures, expeCially towards explanations. He assumed a very broad and high knowledge of math. The Professor Sing cvurse was not recommended unless one had a very strong math background Management of Financial Institutions is an advanced Finance course. Dr. the end of the semester. He had extensive office hourse, is approachable after class and holds an open-door policy evenings in his room on campus. One and was willing to put a great deal of time and effort into the course. It was Sing was highly recommended by all of his students. The workload consisted mainly for serious science students. of tests and cases. Dr. Sing's grading methods were considered strict. stud~nt describes his attitude towards the class as one of "dedication, However, his excellent command of the material made the course interesting. interest and stimulation." There were two tests and a final. These were fair in Elementary Physics Responses: 35 This course is recommended for the serious Finance student only. content' and were graded fairly as well. The material was drawn from a textbook, a supplemental reading book, and his lectures, with emphasis on Professor Thaler the latter. Professor Zrinyi could improve by allowing questions during class The course was a lecture format, with several tests, homework and a final some thought, but most found that there was no need for improvement. As the requirements of the course. Dr. Thaler was judged to teach a good course one student put it, "Fr. Zrinyi is a an excellent teacher and very humorous. with a good attitude. His command and conveyance of the material was Chemlst,y deemed good. The grades were fair and the tests were thought to be You never become tired of his course." demanding but also fair. Some critiques, though, judged the tests a bit too General Chemistry I Responses: 17 Microeconomics Responses: 39 hard and the teacher vague in 'his presentation. The recommendation for the Professor Baker course was split, with those not recommending it basing their opinio~ on the The course consisted of 3 hours of lecture, 3 hours lab and 2 hours of Professor Dodge Professor Dodge had a very good command of the material, although she tests and the nature of the course. Those recommending it felt that It was a recitation per week. The respondents agreed Dr. Baker had a good command useful course that proved interesting most of the time. of the material but was often confused and vague in presenting it. The had difficulty conveying it to the students in her lectures. This condition Teaching Assistant was utilized rather than Dr. Baker for questions or improved steadily throughout the semester though. The professor was very problems. Many students felt he had a very poor attitude towards the course available to students; she was always willing to extend office hours. Her and his students. The workload consisted of 3 tests, a final, and short quizzes attitude towards the course was excellent, she also demonstrated an interest as well as lab work. Many of those responding claimed that the exams were in the students' understanding of the material. Three tests were given Felli Course too long and often not very fair. Some remarked that his grading was not throughout the semester, no final was issued., The tests were fair as well as the always fair either. Many recommended that Dr, Baker's lectures should be grading which was sometimes described as being "too easy." Professor Dodge more organized and that he be more accessible to students. A common could improve on her lecture style and organization. Many students felt that criticism was that his expectations of the students were unreasonable for the they did not acquire the sufficient background needed to take upper level Ctitique Results course. Dr. Baker received a 1.8 overall appraisal. economics courses. Therefore, the course was not recommended for the serious economics student. The 1976 Fall Course Critiques are being published by the Quantitative Analytical Chemistry Responses: 20 out of 28 Responses: 79 Student Academic Board. in cooperation with The HOY A and Professor Bastiaans Microeconomics Professor Bastiaans displayed an excellent command of the material yet he Professor Voss under the direction of Walter Cook. often spoke too quickly in his presentation for adequate comprehension on This professor has been an instant hit on his first year here at G.V. He w~ Contributing to the layout and production of the critiques the part of the students. Generally available to his students, Professor noted as having an excellent command of the material and conveyed hiS were: Bastiaans showed a good attitude toward the course. knowledge of it very well through various imaginative me~s. Even h~s Workload was comprised of four tests, one final, and periodic problem anecdotes and jokes fit into the material at hand. He was available to hiS Lou Anne Bulik sets. For the most part, tests were considered to be fair. All assignments were students above and beyond the call of duty: after class, during and after Bridget McInerney office hours as well as study sessions which he held almost weekly. He had an considered relevant to the material covered at the time. Mary Schlickman A requirement of chemistry majors, it was recommended only for serious excellent attitude towards the course and the students, making economics students who plan to go on in chemistry. The professor's overall rating on a very enjoyable and interesting. The workload consisted of a textbook and a Friday, April 9, 1976 The HOY A Page S-3 English an~ Literature Expository Writing Responses: 11 out of 25 discussions with her own ·~verriding viewpoint. The pr.afessor was available journal were assigned. Grades were fair and Professor Cloke was generous in . Professor Cardaci and toolc real interest in problems peculiar to freshmen. Not seen as too hard, constructive criticism on writing. The students suggested that to improve the .. Through his method of discussion, Professor Cardaci conveyed to the the four essays were absorbing·and graded fairly. Strongly recommended, the course the professor should limit the subject matter more and open up more stude'nts both a good command of. the subject and a beneficial attitude. ·cou~e improved reading for pleasure and understanding. Professor. Holmer to discussion. Professor Cloke received an average rating of 3.64. Concrete criticisms of corrected papers and out of class help lead to a definite ' was assigned a value of 3.6. This course was highly recommended as a beneficial, worthwhile course improvement in writing skills. The· weekly writing assignments rated as and excellent professor. . stimulating and relative. A.$ a course the grading is pass/fail, some individual Professor Hughes . .: . Responses: 23 out of 51 marks on,papers did not measure up to the level of "fair." On the ascending Tangents are necessary for math teachers, but annoying in an English cla~s, Dickens Responses: 28 out of 34 scall:!of 1.0·4.0, Professor Cardaci was assigned the value of 3.4. like Professor Hughes'. Otherwise, ~here were no major probl~ms in his Professor Fisher teachingmeihod or convenient hours. Class was relaxed and creative with a . Professor Fisher organized her course on a discussion basis. She had an Professor Fisher Responses: 19 out of 34 prepared and open·mindeil professor. Three papers and three tests were rated excellent. command of the material and conveyed this well to the class. She With enthusiasm and a sense of humor, Professor Fisher made, her course as fairahd interesting. If a person likes to write short stories. the class was was always available and very enthusiastic in her attitude toward the course. an enjoyable learning experience; Regular office hours, an appointment strongly recommended. Professor Hughes was assigned a yalue of 3.4.· . The course was structured on a basis of reading six of Dickens' novels and schedule, plus an open phone gave the teacher gteat accessibility. The weekly writing journal entried (5·10 pages) due at the beginning of discussion on the papers usually pertained to material in .class, but additional assignments often Professor Knoll Responses: 25 out of 57 novel. Students found these to be very profitable and they served to reduce dulled the interest. Assuming the intention of the course was to teach the Describing the course as exciting and enjoyable and Professor Knoll as pressure somewhat. There were no exams, and an optional long paper. Grades basics. of English writing,· the professor succeeded, especially in the area of excellent, the students felt the class was a great combination. His command, were fair, no one made any special comments about them. Students on the organization. Professor Fisher was ~signed the value of 3.7. conveyance, attitude and availability were all ranked highly. A great deal of whole felt the discussions were beneficial, but wished for a little more lecture, reading made up for only two papers, which were marked evenly; With the and structure. Professor Fisher received an average rating of 3.71. Professor Glavin emphasis on learning, not on grades, most of the assignments were rousing. As All students save one recommended this course enthusiastically, but Professor Glavin's ~lass could not be reached for the critiques. an addition, "Fr. Knoll took most personal interest in each student.'? warned of the enormous reading load, Professor Fisher and the material were Professor 'Knoll was assigned a value of 3.9. well worth the time and effort. Professor Hanen . Responses: 10 of 22 Professor Hanen achieved the goal of conveying her knowledge as to Professor Mengel . Responses: 17 out of 24 Craft of Poetry Responses: 9 out of 16 improving writing skills. Though the teacher'was obtainable and had a good Professor Mengel conveyed a full semester of knowledge, and as can be Professor Flint attitude, many classes were seen as tob lax or boring. The frequent short expected, this drew mixed revie.Ws. No tests were given, but six papers lI:nd The Craft of Poetry was a seminar structured mainly along the lines of the compositions corresponded to class work, but were often to~ elementary to concentrated readings took some effort. In dealing with so much materIal, poetry written by its members and discussion of it. Professor Flint had an be provocative. Professor Hanen was assigned the value of 3.1. some of the discussions became depersonalized and occasionally boring. If excellent command of the material and conveyed it well. He was always one could handle the quantity, the quality of the assignments was r:,-ted high available to students and had an excellent attitude toward his course. Professor Pickett Responses: 20 out of 24 and engaging. The professor was available for help, but the compositions were· Assignments were stimulating, a poem a week, discussion of those, and a Like most expository classes, students wrote essays out of class and graded fairly enough. Professor Mengel was assigned a value of 3.3. journal comprised the workload. There were no exams and also no grades. discussed them in class on a pass/fail basis. The overriding concensus was that The course was pass/fail All the students critiquing the course declined to Professor Pickett taught well and had convenient hours for extra help. Both Professor Ragussis .. Responses: 21 out of 53 offer suggestions for improvement, declaring it unnecessary. Professor Flint the gram~ar and the different techniques. of styles .offered were seen as Typical of the "average" Georgetown proctor, in the good sense of the received an average rating of 4.0+. . necessary, but not interesting. Professor Pickett was asSigned the value of 3.3. word, would be one like Professor Ragussis. Communication of his knowledge This course was highly recommended to those individuals who are in a give and take manner fostered a comfortable atmosphere. Two tests and dedicated and serious about their poetry-course' and professor were Professor Seigel . Responses: 16 out of 27 three papers were seen as fair in relativity ,!lnd grading. Through a full work excellent. , Combining a helpful personality and frequent conferences, Professor Seigel load, analysis and comprehenSion of literature were improved. StUdents asked enabled many of his students to improve their abilities. The only complaint . for a little more freedom but otherwise endorsed the course. Professor Modern Drama Responses: 17 out of 32 about his attitude of conveyance of material was that sometimes humor went . Ragussis was assigned a valu~ of 3.3. too far. Joined with audio=visual aids,. the weekly papers were more rousing Professor Fox The class was run on a workshop format, and the majority of the than would be otherwise. Professor Seigel was assigned a value of 3.5. Professor Siakey Responses: 22 out of 50 responding stUdents agreed what while Professor Fox seemed adequately in Professor Slakey presented a "new way of reading literature." Going command of the subject matter, his method of presentation did not Poetry-Drama , beyond the basics of reading and writing, the course w~s cha}le~ging i~ more adequately convey this knowledge to the students and his lack of Professor Agers Responses: 7 of 23 abstract subjects. Open discussion showed the professor s expertise, whIle out organization was an added impediment to the course. Professor Fox was Professor Agers received mixed reviews for his course, that dealt mainly of class appointments revealed true interest in the individuals. As the grass is with Dante and T.S, Eliot. Though there was much class participation and always greener elsewhere, some students asked for more lectures on concrete generally felt to be available to the students, though a few commented that his availability lapsed as the semester progressed due to his involvement in an motivation to work, it was agreed that too much work assigned to be topics in a more instructive teaching method. Professor Siakey was assigned a outside project. The attitude which Professor Fox had toward the course intriguing. Opposing his knowledge and attitude, which were rated good, value of 3.3. students complained that the teacher had a closed opinion and was too material was enthusiastic but his disorganization in class was noted as a reservation to his attitude toward the class itself. _ anti·religious. One of the few courses not recommended in this survey, Professor Slevin Responses: 41 out of 45 Professor Agers was assigned a value of 2.3. The plays which were assigned (Chekhov, Brecht, and Strindberg) were Professor Slevin achieved the goal of teaching, it seems: to show students interesting and well chosen, but some felt the other assignments weren't how to think. Not only did they gain the analytic process of perception, Professor Flint Responses: 24 out of 50 interesting or profitable. There were no examinations in the class and the interpretation became enjoyable. Though faulted on his overly dramatic grades were based on journals and projects, neither of which had been graded Receiving hardly any negative feedback, Professor Flint made it a pleasure presentation, students appreciated the professor's encouragement and flexible to learn in his class. Basic instructions were ~ught, as well as how to explore yet. The workload was comprised of a journal; a final project, and reading schedule, The assignments were not always absorbing, but were connected to and acting throughout the semester. Suggestions for improved effectiveness and understand literature. As one student noted, "Professor Flint teaches his class discussion, and graded fairly. Other selections than just alienation were students how to enjoy poetry." This course would be ideaUor someone who ranged from generalities such as "get organized" to the specifics of assigning suggested for topics of the course. Professor Slevin was assigned a value of the final project earlier in the semester to allow time for completion since the wants mory poetry than drama in a discussion atmosphere with a moderate 3.4. . workload. Professor Flint was assigned the value of 3.7 _ . grade was so dependent upon it, and a greater amount of time devoted to lecturing. The average rating given to Professor Fox was a 2,78, attributed by Professor Smith Responses: 24 out of 50 Professor Fox Responses: 18 out of 53 most to his lack of organization. The marking system of Professor Smith seemed t.h·e center ?f the merit ~f TIle course was recommended by 2/3 of tlle students as a pleasant deviation Using unconventional techniques and an. energetic attitude, Prof~ssor Fox the course. A majority said the strict grading of the fIve essays Improv~d theIr directed an invigorating,class. There were fIve two J?age papers, .which could from strictly organized courses and i.nteresting for those who had some acting writing style with an eye to the future. Others felt the professor was blased to experience . . ot!consulteaabout after dass, that were graded faIrly. The mam feature of opposing opinions, and this lead to grustration. James Joyce and Henry the course was perforIning drama in class. Combining stimulating work on a James were emphasized in the course, and were covered very adequately by light scale, a creative atmosphere and a learning experience, this class was the professor with a good attitude. Usually intriguing, the five papers anticipated rather than dreaded. Professor Fox was assigned a value of 3.2. Blake correlated to the class topics, and time was available after class for questions. Professor Glavin Professor Smith was assigned a value of 3.3. Professor Hannari·'- ., . . Responses: 18.out of 28. This course did not meet on the day appointed to fill out course criti9.ues_ .In his .lectures,. Professor Harman transferred his knowledge and· even Freshman Honors~Responses: 24 out of 31 American Wilderness Responses: 14 out of 28 disposition, but f!1any students preferred more discussion sessions. The three Professor Madden papers and four tests were fair and reflected subject matter, though they Professor Hanen For all those interested, able, and willing to work in Freshman English, The course material was presented mainly through discussion. Professor lacked enough constructive criticism. There was no problem with grades and there is an Honors course taught by Professor Madden. He has the necessary the teacher was available for other areas of question, Having Chaucer, Hanen was very knowledgeable and yet about 6 people felt her lectures were qualifications of ability, attitude, and time to run such a class. Constant confusing. The professor kept regular office hours and in addition, could be Shakespeare, and Milton as the basis, the course was seen as interesting. reading and frequent compositions demand a lot of time, but are stimulating Professor Harman was assigned a value of 3.3. seen by appointment. She did have a good attitude towards the course despite and rewarding. The student gains an insight to literature and himself but it is the fact that she was absent from several classes_ Most students felt only recommended for those with real desire and a willingness to participate assignments were relevant and interesting though a few felt that certain Professor Pfordresher Responses: 24 out of 28 in a seminar atmosphere. Professor Madden was assigned a value of 3.5. About the only complaint his students had was that Professor Pfordresher readings were boring, Emerson in particular. had such a 'commarid of the subject that he was somewhat inflexible in There were two take-home exams, two 5-7 page papers, one ten page accepting new ideas. Uniting an interested attitude of the teacher, visual aids, paper, and one set of review questions. About four out of the fourteen felt and absorbing compositions, the class was extremely enjoyable to attend. The Upper Level English Courses she was a difficult grader, the· rest were satisfied with her fairness. Several students suggested a little more organization in the course would be helpful. professor gave insight to extrication of material in open discussion classes. Sophomore Honors Responses: 9 out of 17 There were two take-home exams. Professor Pfordresher was assigned a value A few suggested adjusting the reading list to make it more interesting. About Professor Betz five people would not recommend the course, the remainder would if you of 3.7. Sophomore Honors was a discussion class. Professor Betz had a good were interested in the subject matter and especially for American Studies command of the subject matter and his manner of presentation conveyed this majors. Profess·or Reagan Responses: 20 out of 48 well to the class. He was always available to students and willing to help In principle, the students liked Professor Regan's course, though they saw them. He had a very good attitude toward the class and the students in it. Byron, Shelley and Keats Responses: 12 out of 22 room for particular improvements. More modem poetry, a great number of The assignments were stimulatip~ and closely related to the material at essays and a different format for participation were some suggestions. The hand. The workload was heavy, consisting of one final exam, 8 one-page Professor Harman teach;r transmitted the information in such a way as to "stimula:te the commentaries, a five-page paper and two ten-page papers. Professor Betz "Byron, Shelley and Keats" was a predominantly lecture course with a little· discussion. Professor Harman had a good command of the material and students' thoughts," and further learning was advanced by the interest of the graded fairly strictly, but spent much time with papers and gave good professor in his pupils. Though little class time was given to reviewing papers, criticisms and encouragement. Those students who suggested means of conveyed this effectively to the class through his lecture style. StUdents who they were fair and relevant to the subject. Professor Regan was assigned a improvement (3) indicated that Professor Betz should keep a tighter rein on sought him out found him available although it was suggested that he could value of 3.3. discussion. He received an average rating of 3.66. expand his office hours. He had a good attitude toward the course. Since assignments were the material at hand they were related and were Every stUdent critiquing the course recommended it highly but warned in the course were difficult, but grading Professor Rosenblatt Responses: 23 out of 23 that it was very demanding. almost always stimulating, The exams "A greater appreciation of older English poetry" is what one student was usually felt to be fair, The workload consisted of three tests (one on each poet) and a final. Students suggested that to improve this course, Professor gained from Professor Rosenblatt's course. Concentrating on Shakespeare in a European Novel Responses: 29 out of 34 mixed format of lecture, discussion and six papers, the class required thought Harman should structure the course to allow for more discussion, and Professor Cardaci perhaps cut back on the assignments to allow more in-depth preparation. but had its reward. The compositions were graded fairly, were interesting, and combination of lecture and discussion constituted the structure of this A Professor Harman recieved an average rating of 3.49. reflected the subject. The professor was obtainable, had good attitude, but a course. Professor Cardaci had an excellent command of the material imd was All stUdents critiquing this course recommended it provided of course the was often vague and disorganized in his presentations. Professor Rosenblatt especially good in his approaches to the Russian literature. His guidance of student likes romantic poetry, because the professor was very thorough and was assigned a value of 3.3. class discussion was effective in conveying his interest and knowledge to the knowledgeableas well as enjoyable_ class. The professor was always available to students and had a good attitude Professor O'Connor Responses: 20 out of 28 toward both the subject matter and the class. Junior Honors Responses: 10 out of 15 Professor O~Connor was willing to share his expertise in ancient Greek and The assignments were stimulating and helpful to the comparison of the Professor Hirsh modern poetry, but not all of his students liked the conditions. In imparting works though some students (5) felt that this guideline unnecessarily limited The Junior Honors class was structured as a seminar. Professor Hirsh had the facts "his personality, one of indignancy and supremacy, was highly the' scope of possible approach. The worldoad was comprised of three papers an exc~llent command of the subject matter and usually conveyed this well. reflected.''' On the four strictly marked papers, mandatory rewrites allowed in which two novels were compared and one take-home final. Grading was Three students felt· that at times in his enthusiasm and with his described as hard, but fair. Among the suggestions for improvement of the no creativity of thought. Although, they said the course was worthwhile in presupposition of a broad background in his students he spoke over their retrospect, most students did not recommend it. Professor O'Connor was course which were offerred, the most repeated was that the papers could be heads. He was readily available to students and very much interested in the assigned a value of 2.8. returned quicker than they were. Several students also voiced the suggestion subject matter and students. ' that Professor Cardaci should attempt to be more receptive to opinions The assignments were generally felt to be stimulating though scholarly and differing from his own. The professor received an average rating of 3.52. Short Story-Novel Jong. Workload was comprised of weekly commentaries (1-2 pp), a longer The overwhelming majority of students recommended the course highly, Professor Christy Responses: 17 out of 49 commentary (4-5 pages) and a longer paper. There were no exams, and grades but recommended taking into consideration the heavy load of reading, But Perhaps Professor Christy taught at too high a level to expect for had not as of yet been received. Suggestions for improved effectiveness the professor was excellent and the course profitable. freshmen, and could not bridge that gap. With not enough trust, patience, or centered on the need for more discussion and it was suggested that the understanding, his attitude was "the major problem of the course." There shorter commentaries should be cut out because they were ineffecitve. American Utopias Responses: 13 out of 22 were no complaints about the four compositions, with time after class Professor Hirsh received an average rating of 3.56, available for problems, If a person is articulate, this course will give an Profes~or Christy Professor Christy structured this course in a lecture and discussion format. All the students responding agreed that they would recommend the course in-depth study of literature to his benefit. Otherwise, the class was not to interested students. It is a rare course in Medieval Literature and while the recommended. Professor Christy was assigned a value of 2.2. He was very much in command of the subject matter and could speak knowledgeably on any aspect of it. Most students found Professor Christy workload was heavy, it was worthwhile. Professor Fort Responses: 16 out of 50 available, keeping his regularly scheduled office hours, and seemed to With a fresh and unique teaching style, Professor Fort lead a free and thoroughly enjoy teaching the course. . The assignments were stimulating and pertinent to the material at hand Sophomore Honors easy·going class. Emphasizing the reading as :veil ~ writin~ of fiction, the Professor Holmer Responses: 8 out of 17 course let learning, analysis, and understandmg literature In general come and the reading assignments were not so long that it was not possi):Jle to prepare for every class. There were no exams in the course and workload was Professor Holmer chose a seminar method of teaching the Sophomore naturally. The comprehensive knowledge of the professor was presented well, Honors class. She had a good command of the subject matter and conveyed comprised of. the readings and three papers. The few suggestions offered for in and out of class. It was agreed that the three papers and the short story this well to the students, She was available to students all the time and most were stimulating and leniently graded. Professor Fort was assigned a value of improvement were that more backgro'und material should be assigned. Professor Christy received an average rating of 3.41. students felt she was genuinely concerned about the individuals in the course. 3.5. . , A.$signments were extensive and most stUdents found them stimulating. This course was recommended if the student wishes to read or likes There were no exams, the workload instead was comprised of five papers and Emerson, Hawthorne, Thoreau and Whitman, and is very willing tq share in Professor Hirsh Responses: 16 out of 43 a final exam. Professor Holmer was a fair grader, but three students said that There was unanimous consent that Professor Hirsch imparted his expertise discussions. The students also recommended the professor on the basis of his while fair, grading was difficult. Students suggested that to improve the with a good attitude, and was obtainable. Though the teacher was easy to get outstanding ability with the subject matter and effectiveness in presentation. course the professor should be more open to discussion, and try to refrain along with the wide variety of authors, including Kafka and Bor~es, was from monopolizing it, to let the students do more on their own. She received difficult at times. The five papers and two exams were provokmg and Art and Nature in America Responses: 29 out of 35 an average rating of 3.42. pertinent, but considered too much work along with being stiffly marked, Professor Cloke All the responding students recommended the course because it is small, There was the standard recommendation for this course: if you want to learn "Art and Nature in America" was presented basically through lecture and and covered a wide range of material, with a good instructor. and work fine, but it is no easy grade. Professor Hirsh waS assigned the value class discussion with a few weeks of individual presentations on artists. The of 3.4. professor had an excellent command of the subject matter and conveyed this well to the class. He was always available to students, usually in the Dean's Shakespeare Responses: 20 out of 32 Professor Holmer Responses: 23 out of 25 Office, and was very enthusiastic about the material and course. Professor Holmer It seems that "rofessor Holmer·needs only a little polishing to become a The assignments were stimulating and closely related to the course but This course was a combination lecture and discussion with class superb teacher. Sometimes she felt it necessary to interrupt student-led were very broad in scope. There were no exams, instead two papers and a presentations. Professor Holmer had a good command of the material, but by Page S-4 The HOY A Friday, April 9, 1976 were pertinent to the subject matter. The assignments were also stimulating. 18 out of 22 students said they would recommend this course though only· Workload consisted of one test and 3 papers (6·8 pages). It was generally' six did so enthUSiastically, most agreed that it was a great deal of work and mOle on English agreed that grading was tough, adjectives varying from "questionable," to one had to enter ~ith an interest in the subject matter.· . , . "picayune" and '~mysterious." The only suggestions for improvement were to virtue of the number of plays read, in-depth treatment of each was impossible cut out some of the material and spend more time discussion it jn dept. Romanticism: Definition and Examples Responses: 14 out of 16 and her conveyance was hampered by this fact: She was available to students Professor received an average rating of 3.25. , Professor Ragussis and interested in the individuaL Her attitude toward the course was The course was recommended by all those who critiqued it, but the . Professor.Ragussis led this class in a lecture/discussion style. He h~d a goo~ enthusiastic. student is warned of the intense work load and the need for daily control of the class at all times and an excellent command of the subject The assignments were stimulating on the whole, for those who like preparation. matter, ,conveying this in a stimulating maimer. He had limited· offieehours Shakespeare. The workload consisted of 2 papers (4·5 pages), a final exam but was always willing to set up special times to see students. He was very and an oral project. Professor Holmer was a fair but difficult grader. Students Forster and Lawrence Responses: 19 out of 23 interested in the material and his enthusiasm was communicated effectively suggested that to improve her effectiveness Professor Holmer should limit the Professor Webb to the students. " number of plays read and do them in greater depth and keep a looser rein on Professor Webb's class was predominantly discussion with some lecture. He The assignments stimulated interest in the material and related_ very well. class discussion. She received an average of 3.53. had an excellent command of the subject matter with the ability to 90nvey The exam given at mid-term was difficult, but the professor adjusted his Every student but one recommended the course because it prOVided a this well. The fact that he emphasized discussion so greatly hindered this grading system accordingly. The workload was comprised of 2 papers and a good exposure and background to Shakespeare. The one who declined did so conveyance slightly and some_ felt it slowe_d, down the class a bit. He was midterm as well as preparing one class discussion. Suggestions (or because of the hasty treatment and lack of in·depth study of all the plays. always willing to see students and eager to help, with ample office hours: He improvemen~ were to cut the reading material down, concentrate more on the . had an excellent attitUde towar!i his course and. its students. ' . concept of. romanticism, and open up a little more to discussion. Professor Short Story Responses: 10 out of 33 The assignments were generally agreed to be stimulating and profitable. Ragussis received an average rating of 3.7. Professor Hughes .There were no exams, but two papers which were graded fairly but a bit on This course was recommended as an excellent and t~ought-provoking the difficult side. Suggestions for improvement were few but cen~ered on Professor Hughes' class was of a lecture(discussion format. He had a good course with an outstanding professor. ... command of the subject matter and conveyed this well to the students. He suggesting that he lecture a bit more' or involve more students in the was available for individual help and enjoyed teaching the course while discussions. Professor Webb !Cceived an average rating of 3.6 '. Satire: Classical and NeoClassical Responses: 19 out of 22 making it enjoyable for others. Taking into account the fact that this is a course with a heavy w~rk load, Professor Regan' The assignments made (10 short stories weekly) were stimulating and all students still recommend it highly because it was interesting and Professor Professor Regan directed this class in a discussion format. His knowledge grading likewise. The workload was comprised of a term paper or short story Webb was very good and enthusiastic. of the material was very good. The Professor did not usually play an active (15 pages-, 2 short papers (600 words) and two tests (one of which was a role in disucssion, preferring to let the students find the important ideas take-home). Suggestions for improvement basically were concerned with the American Writers Abroad Responses: 27 out of 38 themselves, yet would disucss anything they might have missed at the end of fact that the course did not require much kkeping up with the worll:, what Professor Yoklavich class, thereby conveying this knowledge to the students well. He was readily Professor Yoklavich's course was structured as a discussion course. He was was gained was done individually to a great degree. It was also suggested that accessible,to the students outside of class and was very interested in the class he prepare class a little more. Professor Hughes received a 3.31 rating. very well versed in the subject matter and did an excellent job of directing and material. This class was recommended because of its enjoyable nature, and informal discussion and providing thought·provoking ideas for discussion. He was Most students found the readings to be very interesting. The one exam flexible in approach and open to suggesti()ns for change. Students found him structure. It provides a good cross-section of authors and varieties of short given at the time of the critique was generally agreed to be1gfair, and required stories_ available and easily approchable, and his attitude toward the course was one "a well thought·out approach" to the material prior to the exam. Grading was of enthusiasm and great interest. viewed to be fair by most students. The workload consisted of two exams American Poets of the Twenties Responses: 25 out of 39 The majority of the class felt the assignments to be interesting with the (one a take·home final) and two papers. Students suggested that to improve Professor Knoll exception of several complaints on individual books which were assigned. The the course one satirist be dropped and the professor deal with satire as a Father Knoll directed this course as a combination of discussion and Professor gave no exams, and the workload consisted of one paper (4.6 pages) genre. Professor Regan received an average rating of 3.41. student presentations. He had an excellent command of the material, but and class participation. The grades on the papers were described as fair but This course was recommended because of the good teacher and interesting usually refrained from giving his own interpretation, preferring rather to help difficult. The suggestions for improvement of the course were divided. subject matterial. the class reach their own conclusions. Many students found this stimulating, 'Almost all students found the class too large to effectively discuss the but a few felt that this made his presentation "boggled." Father Knoll was ill material, and approximately half suggested that the teacher keep a tighter Shakespeare Responses: 27 out of 37. for a good part of the semester, but was otherwise available and easily rein on discussion, and the rest suggested that the class break into small Professor Reno approachable_ He had an excellent attitude toward the course and the groups more frequently. Professor Yoklavich received an average rating of The format for this class was made up of preparation for and performance studen ts in it. 3.51. of dramatic scenes from Shakespeare and critical discussion afterwards.. The assignments were stimulating and relevant to the material at hand. The The course was generally recommended, though for varying reasons. The Professor Reno apparently knew his subject well but his emphasis on student workload was comprised of one oral report, two papers (one 3·5 pages, and readings were sufficient reason for recommendation according to many and involvement sometimes obscured his role in the course. He was generally one 8 or more pages) and a final. Grades on these papers -were fair. most endorsed the course for those who are looking for a good discussion available to students and approachable. Several students commented Suggestions for improvement were baSically that fewer poets whould be course. especially on the TA's attitude remarking that it was very enthusiastic and examined and in greater depth, and enrollment in the class should be limited. Pope and Swift Responses: 18 out of 37 concerned for students. Father Knoll received an average rating of 3.54. Professor Mengel The assignments were generally stimulating, most people enjoyed acting out the scenes and studying Shakespeare in a dramatic method as opposed to This course was highly recommended because of the material and the Professor Mengel organized his class in a lecture structure. He had an stimulating professor. The two students who did not recommend it stated the excellent command of the material but most students either felt his a literary approach. There were no exams, the workload consisted of keeping large enrollment as their reason. presentation was dry, or was unclear. He was available to students, but a good a journal, to be handed in six times, and dramatic presentll_tion and number (1/3) felt that his attitude' left soml'thing to be desired, somewhat discussion. Grades were based solely on the journals and were generally Anglo·lrish Literature Responses: 23 out of 34 indifferent. agreed to be fair. Students suggested that to Improve the course Professor Professor Madden The assignments directly related to the material, but half the students said Reno could be a bit more organized and provide a basic framework earlier in Professor Madden had an excellent command of the subject matter in this they did not stimulate their interests. The workload consisted of one short the semester. The professor recieved an average rating of 3.39. course and his conveyance of this was very good, though perhaps improvable (1-2 pages) commentary for each class. There were no exams, but the grades The course was recommended by a good majority of students for those by more frequent lectUring. He was readily available to students and very on these papers were generally helpful in his comments. Students suggested seeking a dramatic approach to Shakespeare. Professor Reno's approach was enthusiastic in his approach to the subject matter. that to improve the course the professor should provide more discussion and unique and worthwhile. The assignments were stimulating but a little too heavy and close together cut down on the number of commentaries he required. He received an average for an in-depth coverage of all. The workload consisted of 3 papers (3-5 rating of 3.09. Milton Responses: 27 out of 30 pages), a midterm and a final. The midterm was very difficult and 10 of the 18 responding stUdents said that would' rec,?mmend the' course, Professor Rosenblatt comprehensive, but the professor graded accordingly. Grading on the papers but all save 2 had reservations on doing so due to the dry.nature of the class, Professor Rosenblatt taught. this course in a combination of lecture and was gair but difficult. Professor Madden is very demanding on the papers. The but the material was good. 'discussion. He had an outstanding command of the subject matter and students suggested that to increase effectiveness the material covered should conveyed this well to students. He was easily accessible to stUdents and had be .limited and PrcfessorMadden whouldlecture. more .frequently.. He William and Henry James Responses: 7 out ofl6 an enthusiastic attitude toward the course and its members. received an averageratlng of 3.77 _ Professor O'Connor '-The assignments were directiy pertinent to the coarse and very Every student responding recommended this course despite its heavy Professor O'Connor made this' course a combination lecture and stimulating. At the date of the critique there had been no exams and thus no workload or because of the interesting and worthwhile nature of the discussion. He was very enthusiastic about the material and had good grades. The workload was comprised of a final and two papers, one five pages assignments. All agreed that Professor Madden is an excellent professor .. command which he usually conveyed well to hi~ students. A few students and one 10 pages long: The suggestions for improvement centered mainly found his attitude. too condescending but enthusiastic overall. He was around requests that the professor direct the attention of the students to English Novel Responses.:.1B outof21 - generally available tostudents'and-verY Willing-to talk.;':"; : . ',"': important' ideas in the 'text' more fnlquently 'alld'i>E;~ome, a bit more .,,P.r9;(ElS,~otSlevin ,,' .. - "c,,-, ,.'.-L , .!.b,; -j, ,.,.;-,:,-f. ;,\ The· assignments· werestimulatiriganci, very'l:ieilVy.The wO'rkioad consisted -"organiz'ed. 'Outsiderea~iIlgs. o~ Mil~on ,and intro4uctio~~ ~tto Jhe text w~re ! ;.<,~Qf~ssor Sltwin desiglled this"co4r->e: PI?-; a )e<;tur~ and. discussion basis, of three short' papers (3 pages) and one term paper (1'0 pages)~ Grading was . ;ilisosuggested. PrOfessor 'Rosenblatt received an average ~a~ngof 3.68. . ., . empliasis being on disucssion. He had an extensive knowledge of the subject severe and Professor O'Connor concentrated very heavily upon writing style This course was highly recommenaed to all and most Said that even if they matter although a quarter of the class felt that at times the material was over rather than cOlltent. Most of the students found that Professor O'Connor was entered the course with no particular interest'in Milton, they were stimulated their heads. He was very willing to see students and approachable, being in his very willing to accept suggestions for improvement and through discussion by Professor Rosenblatt's approach to the texts. office a good deal of the time. He had a very enthusiastic approach to the many of the problems early in the semester were resolved_ It was suggested material and seemed genuinely interested in the subject and the class. that the course material be re-evaluated because the material was simply too Blake, Wordsworth and Coleridge Responses: 10 out of 14 Most students found the assignments stimulating and all related very great to be covered in the time allowed. He received an average rating of 3.26. Professor Sitterson closely to the material covered. The workload for the course was comprised 6 out of 7 students recommended this course because the material was Professor Sitterson chose a discussion format for this class. He had an of two exams which were graded fairly, and a term paper which was 15·20 worthwhile and Professor O'Connor was very knowledgeable. excellent command of the material but seemed at times wary of making this pages in length. Students suggested that to improve the course the reading list too obvious for fear of lapsing into lecture and thus his conveyance was be cut back a bit to enable them to spend more time on the others and a few Romantics, Socialists and Decadents Responses: 22 out of 25 hindered. He was always available to his students and had a good attitude suggested that he should lecture more, providing a more structured Professor Pfordresher toward the course. framework for the material. Professor Slevin received an average rating of Professor PCordresher gave this course a discussion/lecture format. He was The assignments were stimulating for the most part-depending of course 3.28. very well in command of the material, but some students found that his on the material at hand. The -workload was comprised of 3 papers (5 pages) The course was recommended by almost all (save 2) students because method of presentation failed to provide any cohesiveness or organization to and two exams (which were quote identifications). The grades on· both Professor Slevin is an interesting and very knowledgeable professor and most the material. He was usually approachable and available to the students. He seemed to be fair. Suggestions for improved effectiveness basically indicated of the reading assigned was enjoyable. was generally agreed to be very enthusiastic about the material. that Professor Sitterson should improve his discussions, perhaps lecture more The assignments were generally interesting although the only students who if possible because apparently the students were unwilling to discuss. Tragedy Responses: 8 out of 13 seemed to find themselves really stimulated were those who began with an Professor Sitterson received an average rating of 2.98. Professor Smith interest in the subject matter. There were no exams per se, but four papers 'I\venty percent of the students responding said they would not "Tragedy" was a discussion and lecture class. Professor Smith had a good and a take-home. A significant number of students (5) felt that grading. was recommend the course because it simply was not stimulating enough in command of the subject matter and conveyed this effectively to his students. "arbitrary" but for the most part students felt it was fair_ Suggestions for approach. The remainder recommended it because of the nature of the He was always available to those who sought him out and had a good attitude improvement ranged from: find the professor another course, to liven up the material. Professor Sitterson concentrates solely on the poetry, declining to toward the course. - lecture style and plan better so the class won't fall so far behind schedule. put it in an historical or other context, so the student should be familiar with The course was described as "tightly designed," and thus the assignments Professor Pfordresher received an average rating of 3.23. the poets and like to study poetry for poetry' sake. Fine Arts Department· Drawing I Responses: 13 out of 18 and giving individual attention to each student in the class. He had a good 95-100 was necessary for an A grade_ Professor Brush command of the material, as well as conveying it effectively. Students felt Prof. Brush as having a' definite command of the material; The workload consisten of sculpturing done in class, and a wood sculpture History of American Art Responses: 43 out of 56 conveyed in a manner not simply given, but earned through a struggle_ He was project. There were no exams. Professor Haley approachable, but shy, and encouraged students to speak with him during Professor Cave was given a 3.58 from the students. The students suggested The students felt Professor Haley had a good command of the material, class. He was enthusiastic in his 'attempt to help students grasp concepts and that Professor Cave give advice on a more personal level. It was suggested for and had a real feeling for the subject material. He was approachable and develop skills. those with an artistic bent. available, but most did not feel the need. He seemed to really enjoy the There were no exams and grades were based on the studio portfolio. as material, and was humorous. ' well as the stUdent's interest and participation_ The workload consisted of Graphics-Silkscreen Responses: 7 out of 12 The workooad included gallery visits and a paper on any artist. Students charcoal, pen and ink, wax and ink drawings, and texture collages. There were Professor Chieffo felt these additions were a definite plus to the course. The concensus of 3 homework assignments serving as another criterion for the grade. Professor Chieffo has a good knowledge of silkscreening, and as an artist. students felt the tests were fair, but that the grading scale was strict. The Prof. Brush received a 3.. 28 from the students in his class. The most he explained the material weH to the class. He was described as very helpful paper was 10·15 pages. frequent suggestion from the students was for Prof. Brush to do more and approachable by the students. Professor Haley received a 3.57 from the students. The students wanted teaching, and to give more individual attention. The course was recommended The workload consisted of working with silkscreen, and the student was him to slow down, and to allow for more class discussion. The course was by the students, with stipulations. It was suggested for the person who is able to work at his/her own pace. recommended as a good balance for SFS majors, as well as those in the willing to give up preconceived notions of what art is, and willing to learn The students felt Professor Chieffo should give specific assignments and Business School. You learn a great deal and are given a greater appreciation of how to see and think -in order to draw. It is not a course in the classical give more structure in the 001 class, but it did allow you to use your art. ' method_ imagination. The course was recommended for Chieffo's friendly manner and his clear explanation. History of American Music Drawing I Responses: 9 out of 15 Professor Hume Professor Cave Drawing I Responses:·l1 out of 23 Professor Hume was considered very interesting and well versed in his Prof. Cave had a very good command of the material, and discussed in Professor Geinzer field. Some did not find him available very often, but felt it was not necessary detail how to do about what the students were working on. He was described Professor Geinzer is familiar with many techniques, and all felt he had a in this course. He was enthusiastic. as very interested in his teaching and demonstration, as well as being available good attitude towards the course. Some stUdents claimed he was the most The workload consisted of a journal of music (American) listened to and approachable. approachble professor they've had. during the semester, attending numerous musical events and a final exam. The workload for this course consisted of drawings and discussion of your The workload consisted of drawings in and outside of class. There were 2-3 Professor Hume received a 3.69 from the students. The majority felt no work. There was one final drawing outside of class. The grades were based on outside drawings per week. need for improvement, but some mentioned that he knew the material but your portfolio of drawings. , Professor Chieffo received a 3_7 from the students. The course was not the students. There was also a lack of class discussion. The course was Prof. Cave received 3.85 from the students. The course was recommended definitely recommended by the students, as Chieffo gave insturction and recommended for the student interested in this field. You must attend class as a means for expressing oneself without fear of criticism, and Cave's method criticism when necessary, as well as knowing when to leave the students and it will increase your appreciation and knowledge. The grading scale was which encourages and inspires work. alone. He is able to bring out any talent in both the beginner as well as the considered sticky. experienced artist. Drawing II Responses: 13 out of 20 History of the Opera Responses: 26 out of 31 Professor Cave Intro. to the History of Art Responses: 33 out of 56 Professor Hume Professor Cave ides's were expressed through examples and comparisons of Professor Haley Stitdents were certain that Professor Hume had command of the material, work in class while sharing and discussion of notions about art. Cave was Professor Haley was described as having excellent command of the which was conveyed with personal experience making it entertaining. Th~re always interested in'student's comments and available during and after class~ material, and conveyed it farHy well. He had the average office hours and was was a lack of organization in the lectures. Professor Hume was not really The workload consisted of attendance at class and full participation. approachable, but it was not really necessary in this course. His attitude was available or around school very much (he has no office), but was Drawing was done in class. very good. approachable after class. He was enthusiastic and seemed to love the opera. Professor Cave received a 3.95 from the students_ He was described as The workload consistend of reading material and a paper which allowed an The workload consisted of attending class and one ftnal quiz which seemed handling the material very well, while not hampering creativity. He seemed to in-depth study of the material (students got a lot out of this). Students did very easy. enjoy the students and took the time toexpiain things individually_ not like the mid·tenn, it was poorly structured and not representative oftheir Professor Hume received 3.59 from the students. The stUdents suggested knowledge. There was also a final, and the paper was 10-12 pages. There were that there be some required research or listening material. The students Sculpture I Responses: 6 out of 6 also weekly pop quizzes. suggested that there be some required research or listening material. The Professor Cave Professor Haley received a 3.29 from the students. They suggested he be course was recommended as a survey to be taken as a 6th course. Some felt it Professor Cave was described as being very enthusiastic about sculpture, more organized, and felt the grading system was very strict, considering was fairly turk. Friday. April 9, 1976 The HOY A . Page S·5 Govelnment Conduct and Control of U.S. Diplomacy Responses: 19 out of 32 Modern Political Theory Responses: 30 out of 35 quizzes and book reports. Professor Atkinson Professor Curry On a scale from 1 to 4, Professor Giles was rated at 3.76. Almost all of the Dr. Atkinson has good command of up·to-date material and he does Students agree that Dr. Curry does have an excellent command of the students responding would recommend Dr. Giles to others. extensive research for the course.· His attitude is good and he does seem. course material. She has an extremely good attitude towards the course; some available to the students. say. she really "gets Into it." Dr. Curry is always available when needed, International Law Responses: 0 out of 21 His assignments are stimulating, and his midterm and final test grades are shOwing concern for her students. Professor Godson fair. No improvement seems necessary. . . Extensive reading must be done for her lectures and diSCUSSions, yet the Instructor refused to have the critique forms distributed. Good courSe and well recommended for students interested in current assignments are very stimulating. The format of the course consists of two .. events. Overall.rating:3.2. papers,l mid-term, 1 final, and a few qUizzes, all graded fairly. Organizational Labor in America and World Politics Responses: 0 out of 37 Students suggested improvements dealing with the course, but all felt that Professor Godson Maritime .Resources and National Policy Responses: 7 out of 45 D~, Curry's .tec~nique could not be. better. If you are interested in the subject, Instructor refused to have the critique forms distributed. Professor Atkinson thIS course IS hIghly recommended. Overall rating: 3.7. For this· course you'll find Dr. Atkinson extremely knowledgeable. He is American Government Responses: 58 out of 72 available and very approachable, and has a fine attitude towards this courSe . International Organization Responses: 20 out of 54 Dr. Hitlin simply because he himself is stimulated by the pertinent materiaf. Professor Deibel The format of the class was lecture. All of the students answering replied The work load consisted of one test and one paper, and the grades based Dr. Deibel has a good command of the large amount of material he covers that Dr. Hitlin knew the information and got it across to the students. The on these were deemed fair. The assignments, in general, were very interesting. in· his lectures. He has a very good attitude towards the course, but his professor was readily available to the students and showed an interest in the avajIabilityyto the students is limited. course. The dally reading assignments fit in well with the lectures. The two National Security and Foreign Policy Responses: 6 out of 9 The format of the course consisted of 2 tests and 1 paper of 5·10 pages. exams and final were well-written and fairly graded. Generally, there were· no Professor Atkinson Assignments stimulated interest and did relate to the material while his test complaints from the students. Dr. Atkinson does have a good command of his lecture material but he did grades were fair. Some feel that he is sometimes too picky, requiring a lot of On a scale from 1 to 4, the professor ranked a 3.7. All of his students not convey this knowledge in an effective or interesting manner. Students detail and facts. would recommend this course to others. found him very unapproachable and unavailable. Even the assignments were Most stUdents feel that he should narrow the subject matter down, since not applicable to the material! there is just too much to cover. However, the students do recommend this Public Opinion Responses: 36 out of 53 This is one paper and a final, but nobody can figure out the professor's course if you are prepared to do lots of work. Overall Rating, 2.8. Professor Hitlin style of grading. The fact that there is only one exam creates a great deal of All of the respondents agreed that the instructor had a good command of pressure. Elements of Political Theory Responses: 56 out of 108 the material and had no trouble conveying it. The professor was often . Dr. Atkinson can't improve because he is too set in his ideas and ways; in Professor Douglas available and got along well with the students. The students all agreed that he this course he can do nowhere but up. It seems that this course is not Dr. Professor Doublas received an excellent rating in all aspects of his teaching showed interest in the course: The assignments related to the material at hand Atkinson's favorite course to teach, since this course critique is very methods. The professor's attitude toward the course was very good and this is but at times tended to be redundant. The work load consisted of daily inconsistent with the previous two. In short, no one recommends this course! evident in his class lectures, discussions, and availability to his students. readings, two tests, and a quiz. The exams were a bit abstract, but were Overall Rating: 1.0. 'rhe work load consisted of 2 papers (only 1 mandatory), 'a mid.term, a graded fairly. The students wanted smaller classes and more discussion. final, and a considerable amount of reading. The assignments were generally On a scale from 1 to 4, the students rated this professor at 3.5. All of the : Comparative Political Analysis Responses: 39 out of 52 considered relevant and thought·provoking. The grading was considered fair. students would recommend this course to others. Professor Bailey The only significant criticism that Professor Douglas received was that the Professor Bailey displayed an excellent command of the material and reading list was too long. Other than that, he received a 3.75 rating out of a conveyed it in a well-organized manner. He was available during class and possible 4.0, and his class was recommended by almost all of his stUdents. seemed to encourage office visits. Professor Bailry exhi~ited a professional Elements of Political Theory Responses: 27 out of44 attitude towards the course. Political Theory and Science Seminar Responses:O out of 49 Professor Horigan Most'respondents found the assignments rather challenging; however, a Professor Douglas Most of the students felt that Fr. Horigan knew the material, but he had a . significant minority felt that some of the readings were a bit dry. The grading Did not distribute-class did not meet during the week of critique form difficult time relating his knowledge to the students. As a result, his lectures was deemed fair by most of the respondents. The work load consistend of 2 distribution. wel'e hal'd to follow. Most of the students said that the professor made mid-terms, a final and s short research paper .. himself available, but only a few benefited from their discussions with him. The course is required for Foreign Service students. Most respondents American Government Responses: 50 out of 62 His attitude towards the students was moderate to good. The assignments recomIt!.end the course to serious SFS students who are willing to do the Professors Earle and Horigan related to the material at hand but were far from stimulating. The work load work. On a scale from I to 4, Professor Bailey was rated 3.51. The format of the class was lecture and discussion groups. Both professors consisted of many readings, 2 tests, and a 25·page paper. The examinations knew their material, had a good attitude toward the class, and were available were fair, but often long. The students felt that there should be more Public Administration Responses: 36 out of 50 to the students. Professor Earle was considered a very organized and effective discussions and that the professor was too impersonal during lectures. Many Professor Bailey lecturer, while Fr. Horigan tended to be disorganized and quite frequently students suggested that the course should include more modem theorists. Dr. Bailey had a very good command of the material and conveyed this went off on tangents. On a scale from 1 to 4, this professor was rated by the students at 2.7. knowledge in a effective and organized manner. He was considered a rather The work load consisted of an overabundance of reading and three major Only about half of the responding students would recommend this course to personable professor and was consistently available to students. Most tests. The relevancy of the readings was not in question; however, others. respondents felt that Professor Bailey had a positive attitude towards the practicallyall of the students felt that the readings could be shortened. Grades Pro·Seminar: Great Issues of Political Theory course. were fair. A majority of the class f!'lt the readings were relevant to the course, Professor Horigan Responses: 4 out of 4 Professor Earle received a rating of 3.7 while Fr. Horigan didn't fare as All of the students expressed their admiration for Fr. Horigan's vast although some criticized the assignments as being a bit dry. The exams were well (3.5). The class is highly recommended. considered fair, although grading was strict. The work load was comprised of knowledge of the material covered; they were also impressed with his ability a short paper, a mid·term, and a final. to convey this knowledge. Getting in touch with him was no problem at all. Most respondents recommended Professor Bailey's course to interested American Constitutional Law Responses: 30 out of 48 The students enjoyed his informality although he seemed tired of the material students. He received an overall reating of 3.26 on a scale from 1 to 4. Professor Earle at times. The majority of the students felt that the teacher was a good lecturer and The grade consisted of 3 to 4 class presentations and 1 research paper; Latin American Politics: The Andean Region Responses: 27 out of 37 conveyed the material in an enthusiastic and dedicated way. She was always these were based on topics chosen by the students themselves. None of the Professor Bailey available to the students. There was, however, a significant minority of respondents complained about· the work load, although they all seemed to Most students felt that Professor Bailey was extremely well-prepared and students who disagreed with the majority. have their own ideas on which topics to cover. that he communicated his knowledge effectively. He was found to be The work load consisted of two tests and a paper. The reading was On a scale from 1 to 4, this professor was rated at 3.6. All of the stUdents approachable and was available dUring his office hours. He consistently generally considered too heavy. The grading was fair. The.students felt that replied that they would recommend this course to interested students. displayed an enthusiastic attitude towards the course. Professor Earle could improve by lecturing more on the material in the Most respondents regarded the readings as stimulating, although a outside reading. Theory of Communism Responses: 19 out of 67 significant minority, failed to concur. Professor Bailey gave fairly di.ffi<:ult The. course comes recommli!n.ded for. those interested in constitutiopal law Professor. Karski 'e'xams,' and·'som'e'l'of1tllE\.Identi,fication,q·uestIons .w.er~ con~.l.dered picayune. ,.,aIldare willing to spend a lot of tim~ studying. Professor Earle.teceived a 3.5 Most of the students responding to the survey felt that the instructor Had -The gradihg was.. consld(\redfair: The work load consisted of 1 final, 2 exams, ,. r,ating out ofa. Rossible4.0.. good!command ofthe rnaterial. He' was easily approachable and madeii·i·mself and a short'reseJill!fi paper. available to the students. Many of the stUdents felt that the professor showed Most student~highly recommended Professor Bailey's course to serious Dynamics of International Relations Responses: 29 out of 38 enthusiasm and genuine interest in the course. students with a genuine interest in Latin American politics. Professor Bailey Professor Ello The assignments related to the material, but failed to stimulate the received an overall rating of 3.63 on a scale from 1 to 4. The format of the class was lecture. Dr. Ello had an excellent command of students' interest. The work load consisted of two tests and an optional the material and conveyed it effectively and with a good attitude. A warning, paper. Most of the students felt that the tests were fair; however, all of the American Government Responses: 30 out of 48 however-the professor is very impatient and belittles those who ~k students agreed that the grades were ridiculously low. Many of the complaints Professor Carey questions. had to do with the grading system and the lack of organization. The students Most respondents felt that Professor Carey had a very good command of The work load consisted of 2 exams and 1 two·page paper. The thought that the professor should spend more time on principles and less time the material and conveyed this knowledge in an interesting, although assignments were considered pertinent and interesting. The grades were low. on examples. sometimes subjective, manner. He was found to b~ very open with students Professor Ello received a good rating of 3.6 out of a possible 4.0. The class On a scale from 1 to 4, the students rated this professor at 3.15. Over 77 and was available during office hours. Professor Carey seemed genuinely comes highly recommended, with one reservation: the work load is going to per cent of the class said that they would recommend this course· to interested in the course; be heavy and you are going to have to study many hours. interested students. The course assignments were very interesting, in the opinion of most of the respondents. An overwhelming majority of the students, however, felt Soviet Foreign Pol icy Responses: 32 out of 38 Modern Foreign Governments Responses: 0 out of 43 that the exams were graded harshly and were too long. Most of the class Professor Ello Profeccor Kirkpatrick attributed the low marl,s to the sometimes arbitrary grading procedures The professor was very well versed in the subject and conveyed the Professor refused to have the forms distributed to the class. followed by the graduate T.A. The work load was comprised of 2 tests and a material effectively. He has a good attitude toward the course but is hard to final exam. get in touch with, because of his limited office hours. Western European GovernmentslJ: France Responses: 0 out of 12 Professor Carey's course was recommended to serious government majors. The format of the class is lecture, and the work load consists of two Professor Kirkpatrick He received a 3.27 rating on a scale from 1 to 4. books, a mid·term, and a final. The assignments were considered pertinent Once again, the pforessor did not allow the forms to be distributed. but somewhat boring. The grading was generally considered fair. Several Elements of Political Theory Responses: 65 out of 77 recommendations were made, such as: more small group discussions, more Dynamics of International Relations Professor Carey office hours, and more emphasis on current events. Most students felt that Professor Carey had a very good command of the Professor Ello is considered a very good teacher, receiving a 3.7 rating out The Inter·American System Responses: 0 out of 19 material and conveyed this knowledge in an informative, although sometimes of a possible 4.0. The course comes highly recommended for students Professor McDonough subjective, manner. He was found to be very approachable and was available interested in this field. Surveys were not distributed because the class was running behind in its to students on most occasions. Professor Carey seemed genuinely interested schedule. in his course. Comparative Political Analysis Responses: 0 out of 60 A majority of respondents found the primary source readings stimulating. Professor Ferkiss Geographical Component in International Relations Responses: 21 out of 51 The exams were considered fair; however, a Significant minority felt that the The professor would not allow distribution of forms in class. Professor McDonough grading was too harsh. The work load consisted of 3 exams and 5 books to be All of the respondents agreed that the instructor had a good command of read. Recent and Contemporary American Political Theory Responses: 0 out of 14 the material, although some of them felt he could have conveyed the The courSe is required for Foreign Service students. Most respondents Professor Ferkiss knowledge more effectively. The professor went out of his way to make recommended Professor Carey's course to serious SFS students; however, a The professor refused distribution of forms. himself available to the stUdents and was easy to talk to. He was enthusiastic significant minority were put off by his conservative bent. The professor was and showed a lot of interest in the course. given a rating of 3.0 on a scale from 1 to 4. Politics of Developed Nations Responses: 0 out of 34 The assignments pertained to the material at hand, but some students did not find them interesting. The work load consisted of readings, discussions, Political Science Statistics Responses: 17 out of 38 The professor refused distribution of forms. two optional mid·terms, and a final exam. The exams were good and were Professor Corpeno graded fairly. The biggest complaints from the students concerned the A large majority of the class found the professor boring and unable to Legislative Process Responses: 0 out of 33 inadequacy of the rading materials. Many students felt that the professor communicate the material. He was also cited for being unable to explain the Professor Gibert should get away from the books in his lectures. material in response to students' problems with the course. However, not one The professor would not allow distribution of forms in this class. On a scale from 1 to 4, the stUdents rated this professor at 3.1. Most of the student criticized the professor for being unavailable and most were students would recommend this course to others. impressed by his concern for the students and his easy accessibility. American·Soviet Relations Responses: 16 out of 38 . One·third of the grade was based on homework, one·third on two papers, Professor Gibert International Law Responses: 26 out of 31 and another third on the final. There was also a moderate amount of time The professor displayed an enormous amount of knowledge on the subject Professor O'Brien spent in working with the computer. The homework was found to be and was a very good lecturer. He had a great attitude towards teaching and On a scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent), Dr. O'Brien was rated unhelpful by a majority of the students. made himself available to the students. approximately 3.35 according to the average of those responses received, The class is generally used to fulfill a language requirement and the The asSignments were pertinent and, for the most part, interesting. The including 6 4.0's and 1 2.0. A discussion but primarily lecture-type format consensus was that it should remain as such. The professor received a 2.61 work load consisted of two exams which were mercilessly graded. This could was employed and the overwhelming majority of responses indicated a rating on a scale from 1 to 4. be because the T.A. who grades the exams does not come to class. thorough knowledge and fuJI command of the subject by Professor O'Brien. The class comes highly recommended because it is interesting and He was always available to students during scheduled hours and possessed a Elements of Political Theory Responses: 50 out of 78 provocative. Professor Gibert received a rating of 3.6 out of a possible 4.0. good attitude toward the students and the subject matter. Several students Professor Curry felt that there was excessive homework involved (several hours a night for The professor had a great command of the discussion and lecture material. The American Presidency Responses: 49 out of four days of the week), but most agreed that assignments were fair, relevant, Students find her available and interested-she knew all of them by name! Professor Giles and interesting. The workload comprised 3 tests, equally weighted, and The course consisted of a lot of reading, oral and written tests, quizzes, The format of the class was lecture. All of the students agreed that Dr. briefing of selected cases for class. All respondents recommended ths course, and papers (1 rnid·term, 1 final, and 2 others). Her system of grading is fair. Giles knew the material, although he talked low and fast, making it difficult although most advised future students in the course to be prepared for an Although the subject matter is difficult, you do learn-this is no "turkey" to take notes. Many students felt that the professor held them in contempt. extremely heavy work load. course! He has a very cynical attitude and spends a lot of his lecture time putting As one student said, "Curry is terrific! She treats the students as human down Richard Nixon and Watergate. Students expressed a desire for more Military Instruments of Foreign Policy Responses: 23 out of 38 beings! She is interested in the students and their education." Overall rating: class discussion. There were no complaints about the work load, which Professor O'Brien 3.8. consisted of readings and tests. Only one response out of 23 would not recommend this course while most On a scale from 1 to 4, Dr. Giles was rated at 3.38. Most of the students of those recommending it did so without reservations. The work load includes The American Polity Responses: 16 out of 19 would recommend this course to others. a mid-term and final and a 20+ page paper with all respondents indicating Professor Curry flarness in grading. The professor was usually available to students and many Dr. Curry does have a good command of the material at hand. Assignments U.S. Constitution Responses: 44 out of 63 emphasized his good attitude towards both the subject matter and the are as stimulating as the lectures themselves. Her attitude is excellent, and is Professor Giles students, in spite of his many commitments as head of the department. While always available when needed. All of the students responding said that Professor Giles has an extremely several students felt that there was too much reading (3 major books, one She assigned 1 paper and 1 take·home final; both of these were graded good command of the material and had no trouble conveying this material to over 500 pages long), an equal number felt that they were not excessive but fairly. them in class, which was predominantly conducted in a lecture format. too few. Nevertheless, Professor O'Brien was described as an excellent ~ . Heavy emphasis is placed on early American political theory, especially on However, many students felt that he was aloof and impersonal. Although he lecturer (the general format of the course) with a full grasp of the subject. It· Madison. Dr. Curry is able to integrate literature into government and was readily available, he was extremely unapproachable. Another problem was requested that graduate students be barred from the course. encourages individual creativity, which is rare for a member of the some students experienced was his discrimination against the female sex. Government department: Students expressed a desire for more discussion. State and Local Politics Responses: 0 out of 38 The course is beneficial to anyone interested in law or in government and All of the assignments were interesting and the tests made the student Professor 0 'Connor who wishes to cover a lot ofneeded material. Overall rating: 3.5. think and form an opinion on his own. The work load consisted of 3 tests, 2 Dr. O'Connor refused to have the evalu.ation forms distributed to the class. Page S·6 The HOY A Friday, April 9, 1976 graded more harshly than Simon did, he was easily approachable. far too much material to ·adequately be presented in one semester. Most' Most were satisfied with the course, and sllggestionsfor improvement students .felt it was an interesting history course and gave Dr. Dundin an Gove,nment (Cont.) centered around better organization and pacing. Given that CPA is a dreaded overall rating of approximately 3.2. requirement for most .SFS students, and a difficult course to teach, Simon Introduction to Public POlicy Analysis Responses: 0 out of 9 does a commendable Job. In overall terms, stUdents gave Dr. Simon a 3.4 History of Russia I Responses: 17 Professor O'Connor rating. Professor Faduer . Dr. O'Connor refused to'have the evaluation forms distributed to the class. Professor Fadner generated various responses from students, some terming Soviet State Responses: 0 out of 34 him as senile and ready for retirement. The instructor was felt to have a Public Affairs Seminar: Internship Responses: 0 out of 17 Professor Simon ' generally good command of the material but he did not communicate it to Professor O'Connor This class was not held during the week in which the coursr critique f~rms the majority of the students. One of the greatest criticisms was that the Dr. O'Connor refused to have the evaluation forms distributed to the class. were distributed. - -. instructor did not answer questions during.the lectures and that he was not easily accessible to the students. American Government Responses: 37 out of 62 Elements of Political Theory Responses: 45 out of 88 The workload was: considered as easy by most students. There were five Professor Penniman Professor Sorzano semi·weekly quizzes and a final. The respondents said that memorization was As a ~asic i~tro~~ctory cou:se in government, this course was handled by Dr. Sorzano has an integrated and extensive grasp of his material and.can stressed and recommended that a textbook ·be used to supplement the I?r. Penmman In a sumpathetlc manner to freshmen" in that readings were "express himself like no other prof." Although he holds minimal office hours, lectures. The minority of students· who did recommend the class said that it lIght and the overall work load of two mid·terms and one final were fair and he is very approachable and friendly. He has a great sense of humor and. the was a potentially good course for· those students who are very interested in relevant ~o the lectures (the basic format of the course). Many felt the classroom environment provides for a challenging and rewarding learning Russian history because otherwise the ourse was boring. pre~entattons were domewhat dry, although Dr. Penniman's knowledge of the experience. , subject matter was described as immense. He took a good attitude towards The grades were fail', but the seven reading assignments were reported dull. Modern History-1500 to Present Responses: 42 the course and he was readily available to students. A greater complaint was voiced about the exams. There was one mid·term Professor Foley On a scale from 0 to 4, the professor was rated 3.13 according to the (35%) and one final (65%), and many felt that another mid-term would \lelp The students all enthusiastically recommended Dr. Foley as an enthusiastic average of .the 37 responses received with 34 of the 37 responses (92%) ease the "make it, break it" tension. and stimulating professor. He had a good attitude toward the course and was recommendmg the course-most without reservations. Some also suggested reducing the reading list slightly, and getting So~ano very available to all students. to go more slowly (although he will slow up when requested in class). Aside The workload consisted of: one test, one. final exam, and two five.page U.S. Political Parties Responses: 18 out of 27 from this, Sorzano is highly recommended. He is challenging, enjoyable,and papers, one of which was optional. There was a lot of reading and the Professor Penniman students feel as if they learned something valuable. Students rated Sorzano majority of the students felt the workload was difficult. But everyone, felt" Most respondents recommended the course although many felt a true with a whopping 3.91 overall. that it was a very interesting and worthwhile course for those willing to make interest was required to avoid boredom. The work load was composed of a the effort. mid·term, a final, and a 20.page paper with supplementary readings which History of Political Thought Responses: 45 out of 76 students felt could be more current. Most respondents agree that while Dr. Professor Sorzano Foundations of World History I Responses: 33 Penniman is not a "born" lecturer, he does maintain a wide and complete Dr. Sorzano is an ace lecturer in the Govemment Department. He conveys Professor Goldfrank knowledge of the materiaL The class was primarily based on lectures, which ideas in a freewheeling but informative manner. He holds minimal office Professor Goldfrank was said to have an exceptiomil understanding of students described as bOring, dull, dry and "only marginally titillating." Dr. hours, but frequently invites students to lunch, etc. This policy was indicative history and. a great command of the material. However, the majority of his Penniman was approachable and available to students and demonstrated an of his sincere interest in the students. students commented on the lack of organization in his lectures and that he enthusiastic attitude towards the course. The greatest complaint appeared to The work load consisted of 5 major works (by Plato, Aristotle, sometimes failed to clearly convey his knowledge of the subject. be lack- of current and stimulating readings. Grading was fair and several Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Locke), which were obviously relevant, but The workload was comprised of two midterms, a. final, and an outside responses indicated that the course was a so·called "turk", denoting the sometimes dry and hard to get through. Moreover, his grading system is often reading with a tutorial discussion. The exams were on the whole considered excessive fairness in grading. criticized. Based on a cumulative 100 points, there are five 2·point book tests fair but sometimes unpredictable. The workload was reasonable but there Comparative Political Analysis Responses: 37 out of 58 (very short, one·question quizzes which are sometimes trivial-"you could were varying opinions on the text. The stUdents all recommended the course Professor Pisano read the book and not get the question, or not read the book and guess and felt that Professor Goldfrank handled an impossibly broad course very The evaluations of Dr. Pisano and her course were divided into 2 rather correctly"), one mid·term (25 pOints), and one final (65 points). It is easy to skillfully. distinct groups. Some felt that she was htterested in the course, while others be "nickled and dimed" out of the course. felt she was not interested. Her knowledge of the subject matter was The course and professor received high praise, however. Some thought 19th & 20th Century East European History Responses: 16 questioned by some, while others felt that she was thorougly informed. The Sorzano was a bit "macho," but most appreciated Sorzano's interest, Professor Goldfrank latter bloc of responses (i.e .• those which were favorable) constituted the enthusiasm, and unique character. He constantly challenges students on both Rarely does one professor receive as many favorable ratings as has Dr. minority opiniong, however, and she was rated at 2.67 and recommended by the subject material and ideas of topical University intere~t. As for the course Goldfrank from students in this course. Described as "brilliant" and "my only 21 (57%) of the 37 respondents-many with strong reservations. The itself, "it is a good background in political theory-the course makes you favorite professor," Dr. Goldfrank received what amounts to unqualified readings were dull .to many of the those queried and the lectures were also think-it is not a turkey-if you're at all interested in the course material you accolades for his efforts in this course. The workload consisted of three short considered disorganized and. deviating from the syllabus. The midterm and can'" t go wrong with Sorzano. Students gave Dr. Sorzano an average rating' of papers, one long o.te and an oral final. Several students mentioned that the final, the entire work load, were fair, but the grades were described as 3.74. course could use more organization and a somewhat lightened workload, but arbitrary and "highly unfair." The responses again varied, ranging from "most on the whole, every aspect of the course won high marks. On a scale of one to enjoyable course" to "worthless." four. the professor was consistently rated at or near the top of the scale, with Histot.Y an average of 3.7. None of the respondents chose not to recommend the Developed and Developing States in the International System Modern History-1500 to Present Responses: 45 course to others. Professor Pisano Responses: 48 out of 57 Professor Aguilar The overwhelming majority of responses recommended this course. Many U.S. History I Responses: 25 The class was split in their opmlOns on the worthiness of Proiessor students felt that Dr. Pisano displayed adequate knowledge of the subject Professor Johnson Aguilar's course. Some respondents felt that the instructor presented his matter in her lecture format, although some felt that she based her Reactions varied to Dr. Johnson's introdUctory survey of American material in an unorganized and confusing manner while others felt that he presentations on the readings to an excessive degree. The work load, a History, but on the whole there was little enthusiasm for the course. The was a good lecturer. All agreed that he had a good command of his materiaL mid·term and a final, was usually described as fair, though some felt that the most common objection was the professor's apparent lack of organization It appears that those who enjoyed his personality enjoyed the course. Some grading was arbitrary. The assigned readings were criticized as uninteresting both in lectures and assignments. Course requirements consisted of a commented that he was interested in the human side of history and not just and overlapping with th electures. Dr. Pisano was enthusiastic towards the midterm, final and optional paper. Though there were some students who facts and dates. The instrutor was more or less available if an effort was made course re.commended the course highly, the general feeling was negative, with and was approachable and available to the students. Overall, many felt on the student's part. that the course itself was too broad which limited Dr. Pisano's effectiveness. slIghtly more than half of the students responding not recommending it to The workload consisted of a test on his lectures, another on the readings others. On a scale of one to four, the professor's rating averaged out to just Comparative Political Analysis _ Responses: 5.6 out of 80. and a fi!1.111 :worth 60% of the final grade. There were mixed reactions to the under three. . Professor Simon text and the four required outside readings, some students feeling that they Professor Simon exudes enthusiasm. Despite a large class size, he is were dry and boring. The testing was felt by many students to be difficult. A Modern History-1500 to Present Responses: 39 available and highly approachable to his students. He seemed to derive great little over half the respondents recommended the course. Professor Wilkinson pleasure from teaching the course and having personal contact with his Professor Wilkinson's knowledge of his subject was said to be excellent. He students. He is interesting and articulate, but there was some concern over the Presidential Elections Responses: 35 was very available and was considered to be an extremely fair teacher. Some lack of organization in his lectures. Pr.ofessor Duncan. . .- _ _. _ stUdents, however, felt that his lectures were extremely dry and boring. ;).'~e course .offers aun\ql,le approachtoCPA.;Simon concehtrates interesting and relevant, grading is very fair, but strict. The work involves and helpful, although it is felt that grammar concentration is quite boring at weekly tests Which help learning and make the student work conSistently, times. After having taken the course, many students contended that Mrs. :P,.nch .( Cont.) short, compositions, lab work Ii midterm, and a final. Students want more Simons could have concentrated less on grammar and more on conversational diSCUSSion in . class, rather than, just answering th,e professor's specific practice. Examinations are fair and reflect the subject matter studied. Mrs. questions. ' Most, rated the professor at 4.0, a few at 3.5 or 3.0. Simons is available to her students, and, in their judgement, has a good students fee~ give the ,best indication of knowledge. The work consists of attitude toward her Advanced French course. (3.0 rating ,on, a 1.0-4.0 scale) papers and class presentations. Students seem to want' more background Introductory French I ' Responses: 13 reading and. research; more discussion, and different readings. The ratings of Art Criticism as a Literary Genre ,the-professor ,varied widely, many 4.0's, many 3.0's and the rest in between. Professor Morris The' format of this class is lecture and discussion. The professor is Professor Simons The course is recommended for those seriously interested in the subject This course is basically a l!!cture course, with some discussion occurring at because there_ is a lot of work; but a lot is learned. The professor is very good knowledgeable and effective, and also available to students. The professor's attitude is good, and the ~signments are relevant though not very interesting. times. According to her students, Mme_ Simons has a good command of the at livening up what could sometimes be rAther dry material., material involved, and offers a fair degree of efficiency in transmitting it to , Grades are fair, but strict. The work consists of quizzes, compositions, , her students. The workload (reading, a paper, one examination) is deemed 18th Century French Literature Responses: 11 out of 12 ' memOrizing dialogues and a midterm and final. Studentswant more dialogue just, and criticisms offered by students indicate that the course might include ProfesSor Dupecher and oral practice in the class. Most rated the professor at 3.0 or 3.5, with The ,class is primarily lecture with some discussion. The professor others between 3.2 and 4.0. less lecture and more discussion. All in all, Mme. Simons received a 3.0 in the definitely has agood command of the material and conveys it very well. The' 1.0·4.0 scale of rating for her course, Art Criticism as a Literary Genre. professor is available and ahs a very good attitude to the class. The work French Composition and Stylistics Responses: 26 out of 30 Intermediate Frenchl consists mostly' of readings and papers, with oral presentations and Professor Morris Professor Soudee discussions. There is a choice between a final exam or a paper. Suggestions for The format of the class was lecture and discussion. The professor has, an Mme. Soudee was thought to be very energetic and interesting.in class. She improvements (from those who think the course can be improved) include excellent command of the material and conveys it very effectively especially knew her material well, however, some students expressed a desire for her to more student discussion and fewer readings with more time spent on each the ,finer points of grammar. She is very generous with her time, is always slow the pace of the class. Grading, on the whole, was fair, however, many one. All but three students rated the professor at 4.0, two at3.5 and one at available and even requests that students come to her office to discuss students said they thought the departmental tests did not always coincide 3.9. The class is interesting, it is helpful to have some background in the ,corrections of composition. Her attitude to the class is very enthusiastic and with the material taught in class. Most students stressed the need for more subject. The student must work hard, but learns ,a great deal from an she has a good sense of humor. The assignments relate to the subjeCt matter conversation in the class. Mme. ,Soudee was available to her students, and . enthusiastic and yery well·informedprofessor. but are not usually interesting, with the exception of the literary texts which most ,students thought that she was most helpful. The course is are very good. The work includes a final, readings, compositions and grammar recommended. ' Introdu~tory French I exercises. Grades are fair. Students suggest more and shorter compositions Professor Finel and more conversation as possible improvements. Most rated the professor at It is thought that Mme. Finel has, a good command of her Introductory , 4.0, with other, evaluations between 3.0 and 4.0. French material and that her attitude is good towards the course and her G,eek studentts. Assignments were judged as fair '(papers, and quizzes, thought to Women Writers Responses: 10 out of 11 Greek Tutorial occur a .little too frequently by a majority of those who responded to our' Professor Morris Professor Alatis questionnaire). Mme Finel's course is cited as ",a workable way of learning The format of the class is lecture and discussion.' The professor is The format of this course consists of discussions. The instructor has an French," and her ~xplanations are well prepared, although more time might knowledgeable and effective in conveying the material. She has a good excellent command of the material and conveys it very effectively. His . have been given in learning certain aspects of the language. Mme. Finel earned attitude to the class and is available to students. The workload consists of attitude toward the course was enthusiastic and was available to his studen ts , a3.5 rating on the 1.0·4.0 scale. ' ,readings of novels and excerpts, papers, oral presentations and a final. and willing to help them whenever needed. Dean Alatis is most highly Students suggest fewer authors, with more in·de.pth study of each one and recommended. The workload was comprised of compositions. The 20th Century Literature more discussion. Almost all rated the professor at 4.0, a couple at 3.0 and a assignments were well chosen and related to the material, and the grading was Professor Finel couple at 3.5. This course is especially recommended for French majors and extremely fair. This course is very highly recommended. Dr'; Finel was very organized in her preparation for the course and had an those very interested in the subject, some background is necessary. The excellent knowledge of the material. She was available to her students and professor is, enthusiastic, well prepared and chooses a good selection of had an excellent attitude toward the course. The work-load was comprised of readings. an expose, a term paper, and a final. The grading was fair. The course is most All that' highly recomm,ended. Introductory French I Responses: 12 out of 16 Jazz Professor Rojnoff Jazz I Responses: 30 out of 47 -Introductory French I The format of the class is lecture and discussion. The instructor has a good Professor Webster Professor Hiten command of the language and conveys this effectively. The professor is not Professor Webster seemed informed on the material and students felt his The format of the course includes lecture; discussion, and dialogues. The always easily available, but is very, very enthusiastic in class. The assignments personal comments enlightening . His lectures were somewhat general professor has a, very good command of the material but is sometimes not are not particularly interesting, but, they are relevant. There is daily however. He was easily approachable, but infrequently available for office effective in conveying certain points, such as new grammar, to the class. The homework, two tests and a final. Grading is fair, though sometimes the hours. He had a very relaxed and positive attitude which was transmitted to professor is readily available and enthusiastic. The assignments are interesting professor did not make up the test herself. Most students rated the professor the students. The workload consisted of going to performances, a final project or 1- and relevant. Grading is fair, but hard. The examinations did not always at 4.0, .and recommended her as very interesting and interested. reflect the, subjec matter. The workload consisted of readings, lab work, page paper, and four 15 minute quizzes. The concerts and paper were quizzes and oral and written tests. Most students rated the professor at 3.4. Advanced French I considered enjoyable; some considered the quizzes too specific enjoyable; The class is recommended to those with a sincere interest in the language. It Professor Simons some considered the quizzes too specific. The students suggested more helps to have some background iii. the language. There is a lot of work, but it In general, it is felt that Mrs. Simons has a good command of the material listening assignments be added to the course load. is generally worthwhile, The professor is friendly and stimulates interest in at hand and conveys her knowledge effectively. Assignments (weekly oral and Professor Webster received a 3.55 from his students. It was recommended the subject. written reports and grammar review) have been judged to be fairly interesting for its not overburdening workload, and for those interested in music. Advanced French I Responses: 15 out of 23 Professor Hiten The format is lecture and 'discussion. The teacher has a very good GetmQn command of the material and conveys it effectively. The professor is very Intermediate German I Most students said that this had improved both their speaking ability and available to students and in fact requires that students see her three times per Professor Tichy their comprehension. Herr Fink is considered a fair grader-although his tests semester. She has an enthusiastic attitude to the class. The assignments were Intermediate German with Fauline Tichy is considered a worthwhile were difficult. He was available to his students inside and outside of class, All extremely time·consuming and demanding. The workload consisted of tests, course by all the students in the class. The workload was heavy-there were agreed he had an excellent command of the material. Overall tIle students oral and· written, compositions, book reports, lab work, grammar exercises, nightly homework assignments, but they were generally considered beneficiaL considered it a worthwhile course if you were willing to work. reading French magazines, and giveing presentations. Grading Was fair, but The students were a\sorequired to present an oral presentation to the class, harsh. Most students su!!gested a drastic reduction in the amount of work but' most students still felt that there should be more emphasiS put on oral German Structure I required, and also more informal, discussion. Most rated the professor at work in the class. Fraulein Tichy was considered to have an excellent Professor Jankowsky around 3.5. The class is recommended only if the student is willing to work command of the material. The students said that she was firm in class and All of the students agreed that Prof. Jankowsky had an excellent very hard and spend a lot of time on the work. would not tolerate anyone falling behind. She was highly rated by ail of the ' command of the material; however, most felt that he had difficulty in conveying his knowledge· effecitvely>The students generally felt that . ..,,,.' ;'.: I' 1/.' " • students.· , ',"'i'->"" " ,: A~vaDced French-I'" Responses: :t8 out of 19 considering,the specific'nature'of the course, it was well-handled. The' PrOfessor.',Hitimc",I,,'c', ' , Irrtensive Advanced German F' assignmen ts were always relevant to' tHe 'subject matter, although not always The format of the class includes lecture and discussion and oral reports. Professor Obernberger stimulating. Students did not consider the workload to be excessive. The professor has a good command of the material but is not always effective Many students were enthusiastic about both the course and the professor. Although most students found the course worthwhile, they said that they in conveying it, sometimes talks too fast, sometimes is boring. The professor He had extensive office hours and was always willing to help the students. would only recommend it to those who are especially interested in this field is available to stUdents and meets with them regularly. Her attitude is good. The assignments were considered beneficial, although unstimulating at times. or those who are planning to teach German. They strongly urge only those The assignments relate to the material, yet are not interesting, particularly the The workload was said to be demanding; it required daily preparation for with some knowledge of Linguistics to take the course, grammar. Grades are fair but harsh. The workload is very heavy, including class. Most students were unfavorable to, the lab work, but felt that it should papers, dictees, grammar, readings, tapes, book reviews, tests and a final. A be followed up by more speaking in drill class. They suggested that the Synchr. and Diachr. Language Analysis (German) few students rated the professor betwwen2.5 and 3.0 but more rated her at grammar material be discussed more thoroughly in class. The tests were' Professor Jankowsky 3.4 or 4.0. The class is very good in the oral aspects, requires a lot of hard considered fair-they accurately reflected the subject matter. Thegrading was The students found this course to be interesting and worthwhile. Prof. work, and is time-con~uming. The professor is interested and enthusiastic. fair. The students rated the professor very highly, saying that his pleasant Jankowsky was considered to have a very good command of the material and personality contributed much to the class atmosphere. Many students cited was usually able to convey his knowledge very well. At times, students felt Intensive Basic French I his cultural insights as especilally interesting. the need for more organization in the course. The professor had a good Professor Maubrey attitude towards the course and was generally available to the students. The Dr. Maubrey, cited as a "conneisseur of the French language" by his German Romanticism assignments were stimulating and relevant, especially the reading assignments, students, takes a very active interest in his courses, and uses his own text in Professor Tichy as they were important to the understanding of the lectures. Most students teaching this class. The workload, comprised of exercises from his book, Students reacted to this course with much enthusiasm. They all felt that would recommend this course to others because they felt that it gave a conversation sessions, and laboratory work, as well as weekly quizzes on the the professor had an excellent knowledge of the subject and was able to historical perspective to the study of Linguistics. material learned, is considered fair and very helpful. Since the course is convey this knowledge effectively. The students were especially enthusiastic primarily for SLL French majors, it is large, and some redundancy in the about the broad range of topics covered relating to the subject; it was not Intermediate German I learning process occurs, although Dr. Maubrey's approach often gives the restiricted to literature, as art and music were also discussed as part of the Professor Murphy stl.\dent a new outlook on otherwise "review" material, and reinforces course. Most students were pleased with the relaxed approach taken to the Nearly all the student; were enthusiastic about the course and they previous knowledge. course. The students felt that a relaxed approach allowed for more attributed their enthusiasm directly to Father Murphy. He has a genuine Criticisms offered by students included that the classroom environment independence and encouragement of the individual's own thought. The profes interest in his students-in getting them to learn German. He was highly rated should be less formal (girls are requested to wear skirts, boys, ties), and that sor w'as very available to the students, going so far as to encourage them to by all the students. His tests and grading were considered fair. Most students at times Dr. Maubrey should be less strict and impersonal in his attitude. call her at home should they have any questions. said that he presen~ed the material well. Students said that they found the The general opinion of the Intensive Basic French course tends to be a work particularly stimulating because of the outside materials used. They very favorable one, noting Dr. Maubrey as an outstanding professor (3.5-4.0 Survey of German Literature commended his emphasis on speaking German in class. The students were on the 1.0-4.0 scale). Professor Tichy nearly unaminous in recommending the course to others. Students were generally enthusiastic about this course. Nearly all of the Intensive Advanced French students felt Prof. Tichy to be well versed in the subject matter and able to Advanced German I Professor Maubrey convey her knowledge effectively. The material was interesting and the Professor Murphy Intensive Advanced French, taught by Dr. Maubrey, is ahighly assignments stimulating and relevant. The workload was heavy, but Students generally agreed that this is a worthwhile class. Father Murphy well·organized and truly intensive course very useful for learning the finite worthwhile. The fact that all discussion was in German made the course more was considered to have an excellent command of the material and to have points of a language, once basic skills have been acquired and fully mastered. challenging, and also more interesting to the students. The students felt the conveyed it welL Some suggested that he be more systematic in his approach, The workload, Which consists of exercises, readings and text explanations, course gave them a broad background in German literature. Some students although they were favorable towards his emphaSis on literature and dictations, laboratory work and conversation practice, as well as weekly suggested that the professor could be a bit more systematic in her approach. classroom disucssion. Father Murphy was available to his students and a fair quizzes on material covered in class, is considered fair and interesting. Most felt that she graded fairly. grader. He took a genuine interest in the students. Many students enjoyed the Criticisms offered include need for an increased level of professor-student course because they found it beneficial-without there being too much communication and a more clear definition of Dr. Maubrey's grading system. German Phonetics pressure in the classroom The course deals in relevant language use, and one student cited Dr. Professor Fink Maubrey as follows: "If I've had ten foreign language teachers in my life, The students felt that Professor Fink did a fine job with the course under Contemporary German Literature Pierre Maubrey is the finest. He is able to teach French 1975." Dr. Maubrey the circumstances (it was combined with a Lit and Style class) and that it was Professor Murphy earned a 3.8-4.0 on the 1.0-4.0 scale. therefore worth~ile. The professor had an excellent knowledge of the subject Most students felt that this course was interesting and worthwhile. Fr. matter and was unusually able to convey it to the stUdents. He was highly rated Murphy was considered to have an excellent command of the material. ,The Introduction to Frencil I by all the students. The professor was available to the students and the tests workload was heavy, but relevant to the subject matter and thus ultimately Professor Milhollin workload was heavy. The students especially felt that the course improved rewarding. The workload consisted mainly of papers and interpretations of Mme Milhollin's knowledge of French is excellent. She was always their pronunciation ,of German. . poems. Some students felt that they should be given more time to prepare the available to her students and had a very good attitude toward the course. The assignments. It was also suggested that there should be more emphasis on assignments were ,elevant and, for the most part, stimulated interest. The Introduction to German Lit·Style speaking and discussion in class, The tests were fair, but Fr. Murphy can be a workload was comprised of exercises, lab work, and memorization of Professor Tichy tough grader at times. He seemed genuinely interested in the students and was dialogues. Grades were given on the basis of quizzes and exams. The grading Most students considered the course worthwhile because it provided a available to them after class. Some students suggested that the selection of was extremely fair. The course is most highly recommended. ' good review of grammar while at the same time serving as a good authors should be more varied. Most students would recommend the course emphasis could be placed on literature. The students felt the professor had a to those students interested in literature. Intermediate French I very good command of the subject matter and that she was usually able to Professor Milhollin convey it well. Practical Aspects of German Language, Intro. Mme. Milhollin has an extremely deep knowledge of the subject matter Professor Obernberger and had an excellent attitude toward the course. She was available to her IntroductorY German I \ The students felt that Prof. Odernberger had an excellent command of the stUdents. Grading was fair. The workload consisted of tests, quizzes, Professor Fink subject matter and was able to convey his knowledge effectively to the compositions and oral presentations. The course is highly recommended. Generally the students felt that Herr Fink is a good teacher. He has an students. His attitude towards the course was very good, which in the opinion excellent command of the material and was enthusiastic about teaching the of the students added much to the course itself. The professor was generally Introductory French I course. He tried to convey this enthusiasm to the students. Herr Fink was available to the students. The assignments were relevant to the material and ; Professor Mir·Djalali available to the students both inside and outside of class. Some stUdents served to stimulate the students' interest. The tests were fair and reflected the Students who have pursued this course generally feel that Mme. Mir-Djalali considered his grading scale too hard (94·100 A) and found both the pace and material. rrhe grades were also fair. The professor was very well organized. has a good command of the material and that she conveys her knowledge in the material challenging. The emphasis on grammar was generally commended The students rated the professor very highly. The only suggestion was that an effective manner. Assignments were deemed fair and interesting (two tests, by the students, although some considered it a bit dull and repetitious. the course might be arranged like a seminar-to allow more student discussion short exercises, compositions, and a final writte and oral examination). The Several people recommended that the course be divided into those beginning of the material and topics. All the students said that they would recomment class size in 1974·75 was small enough to permit helpful verbal interaction. German and those who have already studied German before because they the course, especially to those planning a teaching career. Mme. Mir-Djalali is considered to be very concerned about the welfare of her considered the differences between the two groups to be wide-ranging. students, and received a 3.0 on the 1.0-4.0 scale. ' Ethnology of German Minorities Intermed iate German I Professor Obernberger Introductory French I Responses: 14 out of 20 Professor Fink The students considered the course to be interesting and worthwhile. Prof. Professor Morris Intermediate German is a fairly demanding course in the opinion of most Obernberger had a fine command of the material and was able to convey his The format of this class was lecture and discussion. The professor has a of the students. The subject matter and the pace were challenging, which knowledge effectively to the students. He had a good attitude towards the very good command of the material and conveys its effectively, though a made the course worthwhile. Several stUdents suggested that more time be course. He was available to the students. The students did not find the little too quickly at times. She is very available to students and extremely spent explaining the grammar in class as they found it especially difficult. The workload too heavy. The assignments were beneficial and relevant to the enthusiastic; she makes class fun and interesting. Assignments are fairly workload is heave-tests, daily homework assignments and an oral report. subject material. Page S·8 The HOYA Friday, April 9, 1976 Russian Morphology and Syntax consisted of in-class practice and laboratory work. Students appreciated the memorization and ext~emely fair tests. The course is highly recommended. Professor Flaume teacher's patience; grading was fair. Dr. Flaume's course was highly rated by the students. They found the Intermediate Russian· professor to be very knowledgeable and amusing in his lectures. The workload 18th and 19th Century Russian literature Responses:, 8 Professor Pirogov; is rather light, cpnsisting of homework assignments and occasional tests which Professor Grigorieff The overall rating of the course and the professor was good. The workload are very fair. The course is tnvaluable for the student interested in Russian. It This course is highly recommended. Dr. Gregorieff has excellent consisted of written horileworkassignmerits, preparation of dialogues and oral is one of the best courses offered in the department. knowledge of his field. He was always avaIlable to his' students. The and written tests. The students' comments varied in regard to the professor assignments were interesting and relevant. The workload was comprised of conveying his knowledge effectively and the"fairness of exams. The course is Russian Stru'ct~re reading, one paper, and a final exam. His average rating was 3.8. recommended. " Professor Flaume " This course consisted of lectures and discussions with a few assignments. Dostoevsky Advanced Russian Dr. Flaume was rated very highly by all the students. They felt the instructor Professor Grigorieff Professor Pirogov had a good command of the material and conveyed this knowledge Prof. Girgorieff's cOlJrse was highly rated by all the students. They felt the The reviews of this course were very good; The students felt the professor excellently to the students. Students thought the professor could improve the instructor was enthusiastic and inspiring, with an unusual command of the had a good command of the material and conveyed this knowledge course by assigning more homework. The course is highly recommended. material. The course consisted of lectures with too little discussion. The effectively. The workload was fair, consisting of 'discussions, translation, workload was comprised of one paper and a final exam. All felt this course readings and exams. The course is recommended. ' • enjoyable and should be recommended without reservation. Old Church Slavonic Introduction to Russian Litera~ure Responses: 11 Professor Flaume Professor G.·Brougher Intensive Basic Russian Most students highly recommend this course. Coursework consisted of r Professor G.·Brougher was rated extremely high, 4.0. All students wrote lecture and some discussion and a final. The instructor demonstrated an Professor Lager that this is the best course in the department and that Dr. G.·Brougher is one interest in the students and graded fairly. The course was overall rated highly. The most frequent comment was that of the best professors in undergra'c1uate school. All felt that the course was a the teacher should treat his students more like human beings and be more lot of work, but that it was also interesting and exciting. Basic Intensive Russian Responses: 54 scrupulous about, testing only on material already covered in class . .!n spite of Professor Grever the drawbacks, the course was considered to be worthwhile for the Intensive Advanced Russian Responses: 31 Evaluations for Mr. Grever were very good. He had a very good att.itude determined student of Russian. Mention should be made of the extremely Professor G.-Brougher and was very helpful, especially in pronunciation. Some students felt that he heavy workload. Not for the faint of heart. Evaluations ranged from 3.0 to 4.0. Most students thought the course was very enjoyable and profitable. Some thought there should be more should be strict~r. Development of Russian Short Story, Responses:" 14 organization. All felt that Dr. G.·Brougher had an excellent command of Russian Compositions and STyle Responses: 11 Professor Lager Russian. Opinions varied as to her attitude toward the class. The course is" Professor Grever " Dr. Lager was rated between 3.8·4.0. He had good command of the recommended. " Professor Grever was very highly recommended. His average was 3.8. All material, was available to his students, had a good attitude and assigned Russian Compositions and Style Responses: 12 students felt that he knew the material very well, was always available (much " interesting material. The major criticism was that the reading list was too long Professor G.·Brougher more than most professors), gave fair exams and had a very good attitude and each author did not receive equal treatment. The. class discussions Prof. G.·Brougher received fairly good evaluations. However, there seemed toward the course. However, most students felt that there was too much considered very informative. This course was highly recommended. to"be a definite split. Some rated,her the best teacher, while others rated her work for a 3·credit course. It was stressed that this course is extremely lower. This seems to be due to the fact that the better students were favored demanding and meets every day. Introduction to Russian (Il and the students who needed more help felt they were treated with Professor Pirogov impatience. Overall, the tests were .ated to be too particular, and the grading Russian Phonetics Prof. Pirogov received very high ratings from his students. They felt the severe. All students felt that Prof. G.-Brougher was a good teacher and Professor Choseed class atmosphere was very relaxed and enjoyable. The workload is comprised stimulated interest in the "subject. Recommendations for the presentation of This course was highly recommended by the students. Course work of daily homework, which is directly relevant to what the class is learning, vocabulary were given. The course is recommended with reservation. Espanol Introductory Spanish I given a 3.5 rating on a 4.0 scale. The course was recommended for those stimulated the students' interest but profoundly increased what was learned Professor Blouin students really wanting to learn Spanish. from the course. Dr. Klein's exams (mid·term and final) were quite fair, as This intro course consisted of lecture and discussion classes. The professor were her grades. The course was highly recommended for serious students Intro. to Spanish Linguistics had a good command of the material, but some students felt that she was interested in Spanish Linguistics. Out of a possible 4.0 Dr. Klein was rated a Professor Cressey " rushed to complete a certain amount of material. She was rated very highly, 3.3. had a pleasant attitude towards her students and made herself available to An interesting lecturer, Dr. Cressey is highly specialized in his field and easily conveys this knowledge to his students, He is genuinely interested in them. The workload was comprised of quizzes, tests, homework, a mid·tenn, Intermediate Spanish and a final and the grading was fair. the course and readily mades himself available to anyone who has a problem understanding the material. His assignments are worthwhile and definitely Professor Mujica Introductory Spanish I relate to the subject matter studied. He gives three tests about five weeks Conducted through lectures and discussions, this course was recommended Professor Blouin apart. This course is highly recommended for all Spanish speaking students by all who took it. Dr. Mujica is an interesting lecturer and a Slightly This course was a combination of lecture and discussion which included interested in linguistics. demanding professor. She has excellent command of the material she presents weekly tests, lab work, and workbook assignments. The professor had a good and has no problems conveying her ideas to the class. She is. interested in the command of the material, had a good attitude towards her students and was Advanced, Composition and Style Response: 18 students course and her students, making herself readily available to anyone who needs available to them. The professor was rated fair to good. The students .felt that Professor Gerli her help. Her tests and grades were considered to be fair, but there is a bit to they had to do a lot of work on their own and showed dissatisfaction with The format of the course was lecture and discussion. The students felt that study. Her workload is comprised of a number of quizzes, compositions and the lack of explanation on the part of the professor. Professor Gerli had a good command of the material and conveyed this short oral presentations. It's" obvious that Dr. Mujica was liked by her knowledge effectively. He was available to his students. He had an excellent students ... they rated her a stable 3.5. Intermed iate Spanish attitude toward his course and toward his students. The students found the Professor Blouin assignments (reading and papers) stimulating and relevant, but some found Intermediate Spanish them\essstimu\aUng by the end of the semester. Therew~re no exams, but Professor Pardinas This course was mainly oiscussion, although some students felt the The professor was very enthusiastic and conveyed -the material well. The" professor dominated these disucssions. The instructor had a good command the students found the grading of the papers fair. Professor GerIi gave comments for improving the papers. The workload was comprised of reading, workload consisted of papers, tests, quizzes, and readings. Professor Pardinas of the material and an excellent attitude towards the course and her students. was rated highly, but some students expressed a desire for more conversation The workload consisted of reading, tests, compositions, a mid·term and a weekly compositions, and a term paper. The suggestions for improvement were that the material and assignments be varied, that the professor remove in class. The readings were interesting, but the grammar work was not. The final. The one drawbacl< to this course was the lack of stress placed on professor's students earnestly recommended her and the course. speaking" the "language ..Professor,",B1ou"in· was rated highly' and was" himself more from the discussions and that writing styles be disclissed~ " recommended by"a.t le_as.t75% of her stuctenK:, , " Professor Gerli was given. a3,6"rating 'aria, 4.0 sc:a!e. This' course 'was highly'"'·,','.lnterm'ediateSpanish "" .. ' 'I,'i ~ ";'-j ';:)i:~':' 'l.Jl'-/i ;'.,,':,';,< ,;~ ft ~.; ":1' recommended because ItwRshelpful:m "wrltmg " practICe, 'there were'" 'Professor Pardinas 0" Introductory Spanish I" Response: 31 interesting discussions and materials, and the professor was great. The professor had a good attitude towards the course and an. excellent Professor Breiner command of the material. This was a lecture and discussion class that The format of the course was lecture and discussion. The students felt that Medieval and Renaissance Poetry Responses: 3 required oral reports, papers, tests, homework assignments, a mid.term, and a Professor Breiner had a good command of the material and conveyed this Professor Gerli final. The professor has a high rating, but some students expressed the need knowledge well. She was also very available to her students. The professor The format' of the course was lecture. The students felt that the instructor for a friendlier, less tense atmosphere. had a very good attitude toward her course, The assignments on the whole had a" good command of the material and conveyed this knowledge stimulated the students' interests and related to the material at hand. Most of effectively. Professor Cerle was available to his students and he had a very Advanced Spanish the stUdents found the exams fair (although at times difficult) and reflective good attitude towards his course. The students found the assignments Professor Pardinas of the subject matter. The grades were considered fair. The workload was stimulating and related to the material. At the time of this critique, the A good course that was recommended by most who took it. Ms. Pardinas comprised of exercises, quizzes, mid·term, final, short compositions, short students had not received any grades. The workload was comprised of a final is an interesting instructor who knows her material and keeps her class oral reports, and class participation. The one main complaing of the course and a paper. The suggestions for improvement were that an outline be given inspired. A very fair grader, her workload is comprised of two major exams was that the professor went too fast at times, but for the most part, Professor at the beginning of some of the lectures and that the final be divided into a and various written and/or oral reports. She is interested in her students and Breiner was given a 3.7 rating on a 4.0 scale, The course was enthusiastically mid·term and a final. Professor Gerli was given a rating of 4.0 on a 4.0 scale. tries to find time to help them whenever they need her. On a 4.0 scale she recommended as a good basis for the learning of Spanish. This course was highly recommended. was rated 3.6. Advanced Spanish Literature of Spanish America Responses: 21 Advanced Spanish Professor Breiner Professor Gerli Professor Parisi The format of the course was mostly discussion with some lecturing. AU o"r The format of the course was mostly lecture with some discussion. Most of No responses. the students felt that the professor had a good command of the material and the students felt that the instructor had a good command of the material and that she conveyed this knowledge effectively. Professor Breiner was always conveyed this knowledge effectively. Professor Gerli was available to help Intensive Advanced Spanish available to her students and her enthusiastic attitude toward the course made students. Most of the students felt that he had a good attitude toward his Professor Parisi it worthwhile. For the most part, the assignments were stimulating and course, although he admitted that this was not his field. The materials and This Ling./Lang. course had a lecture and discussion format and consisted relevant to the material at hand. The students found the exams fair and assignments were fqund to be relevant to the course, but many stUdents "of frequent grammar and vocabulary tests, compositions, reading assignments, reflective on the subject matter. The grades were considered fair; although found the readings less than stimulating. The exams and grades were a mid·term and a final. The professor had a good command of the material many times they were low. The workload was comprised of 2 mid·terms, four considered fair and the exams were reflective of the subject matter. The and he was rated highly. Exams were difficult, but the grading, far. A need 2·page papers, a final, and class participation. The suggestions made for workload was comprised of one paper, a mid·term and an open·book final. for a slower pace was expressed, but the students felt their Spanish had improvement were that there should be more oral participation for the Suggestions for improvement were that there be class. discussion and improved. students and that En Busca a Espana be removed as reading material. participation. A slower and more in·depth covering of the material and more Hispanic Culture and Civilization Responses: 19 Professor Breiner was given an overall rating of3.9 on a 4.0 scale. The course tests. Professor Gerli was given a 3.4 rating on a 4,0 scale. Most of the Professor Suarez·Torres was highly recommended mostly because most of the students said she was students recommended this course as a study of Spanish American literature, The format of the course was self·paced and seminar. All of the students the best Spanish teacher they had ever had. but said that the material was quite boring. Professor Cerli was one of the felt that the instructor had a good command of the material and that he main reasons that this course was recommended. conveyed this knowledge effectively on those days when the seminar was Introductory Spanish Response:21 , given. Professor Suarez·Torres was available to his students and he had an Professor CasteUaros Advanced Spanish The format consisted of lecture, discussion, and drill. Professor Castellaros Professor Irizarry excellent attitude toward the course. The assignments were related to the text had a good command of the material and most of the students said she This was a lecture and discussion course that was comprised of tests, oral book in that the students had to study for the tests. The assignments weren't conveyed her knowledge effectively. The professor was available to her reports, readings, a mid-term and a final. The professor had a good command necessarily stimulating. On the most part, the stUdents felt that the exams students and had a good attitude toward the course. All of the students felt of the material and showed a strong interest in the students' welfare. Exams reflected the subject matter but they found the questions picky. The grading that the assignments were related to the material at hand, but the assignments and grades were fair. The professor was rated highly and the course was was considered fair. The workload was comprised of twelve unit tests, a mid·term, a final and an oral presentation and a paper. The students felt that were not considered very stimulating by the majority of ~tudents. The recommended. students felt that the examinations and grades were fair and reflected the if the tests were" less specific and if there were more lectures the course could subject matter. They did not like the departmental mid·term. The workload Spanish Literature be improved. Professor Suarez-Torres was given a 3.2 rating on a 4.0 scale. consisted of quizzes, t.ests, and one composition. The biggest complaints were Professor Irizarry This course was recommended for those students who are not procrastinators the need for a new textbook and for a slower teaching pace. Professor The professor had a good command of the material and conveyed it and for those interested in Spanish history. effectively. The format for the course was lecture and discussion and the CasteUaros was given an overall rating of 3.1 on a 4.0 scale. This course was Spanish·American Post·Modernism recommended to others as a good course for learning Spanish on the attitude displayed was one of enthusiasm. The tests were difficult, but fair as were the grades. Tests, papers, projects and a lot of reading were required. Professor Suarez·Torres introductory level. The students strongly recommended, but would warn others that most of the Dr. Suarez·Torres conducted his course through lectures and discussions. material was "skimmed over" and not taught in depth. He has a good command of the material he presents, but his presentation can Intermediate Spanish Response: 14 tend to be somewhat unclear. ItIt seems Dr. Suarez·Torres has some difficulty Professor Castellaros Twentieth Century Spanish Literature expressing his ideas in an understandable fashion. Nevertheless, he is The format for "the course was mostly discussion with some lecturing. The Professor Irizarry interested in what he teaches and tries to help his students if they need it. His students felt that Professor Castellaros had a good command of the material This literature course was a seminar class including lecture and discussion. tests and grades are very fair, althoug\:1 they tend to be picky. His workload is and conveyed this knowledge effectively. She was readily available to her The workload was comprised of readings, class presentations and paper (or comprised of tests, papers and an oral presentation. Despite the professor's" students and they all felt that she had a very good attitude toward the course. final). The professor knew the material and conveyed it well, had an excellen lack of organization, the course was recommended by those who took it. As Most of the students found that the assignments were interst·stimulating and attitude towards the course and students. The course and professor were for Dr. Suarez.Torres, he was rated an averaged 3.3 out of 4.0. related to the material at hand. They all found the examinations fair and rated very highly. reflective of the subject matter. The grades were considered fair. The Carib. Social Novel workload was comprised of several compositions, one quiz, a mid·term, and a Advanced Spanish Composition and Style Professor Suarez·Torres final. The only main suggestion was that there be more grammar coverage. Professor Klein Dr. Suarez·Torres' seminar on the Caribbean Social Novel is a rather Senorita Castellaros was given a 3.8 rating on a 4.0 scale and her course was A course conducted through discussions, Dr. Klein's Adv. Compo and Style controversial course. Some students liked it and others didn't. The same goes highly recommended. is recommended for those students interested in brushing up on their writing for the professor. Some thought the assignments were very stimulating while abilities and grammar. Dr. Klein makes herself available to those students who others considered them to be boring and a waste of time. It seems the course Intensive Basic Spansih I Response: 40 students seek her help. Although her assignments relate to the material studied, they was poorly organized which perhaps reflects the professor's attitude towards Professor Cressey can tend to be a bit boring. She requires various compositions, an oral it. Those students that did like it recommended it even though Dr. The format of the course was lecture with labs and drill classes. The presentation and gives a quiz every now and then. She grades on a curve, like Suarez·Torres' averaged rating was a low 3.0. students felt that Professor Cressey had a good command of the material and it or not, which gives the native speakers a slight advantage over the others. In conveyed this knowledge effectively. He was available to his students during the past the students have been satisfied-not overly, though-With this , Intermediate Spanish his office hours and between classes. He had an excellent attitude toward his course. As for the professor, she only rated an averaged 3.3 out of a possible Professor Wear course and showed interest in his students. The assignments were considered 4.0. Professor Wear conducts her class through discussions. Most of her related to the material at hand but were notconsidered stimulating. The students agree that she has a good command of the material sh~ presents and examinations were fair and reflective of the subject matter. Some students History of the Spanish Language conveys this knowledge effllctively to her students. She is always available to felt that the grading was harsh at times. The workload was comprised of a Professor Klein those students who need special help. Her assignments are interesting and deal quiz almost every Friday, 2 oral tests, mid·term, final, written assignments 2 Dr. Klein is a very good professor for this course. She has an excellent with the subject material studied. Her grades and tests are fair and her or 3 times a week and 1/2 hour daily of lab work. The suggestions for command of the material even though she sometimes has a bit of difficulty workload is comprised of three tests, a few quizzes and a .s:!?uple of -written improvement of the course were that more vocabulary be given, get better expressing her ideas clearly (she tends to be a little disorganized). She is very exercises. Overall, the course was recommended to anyone with some drill instructors, and more speaking practice in class. Professor Cressey was interested in what she teaches and in her students. Her assignments not only knowledge of the language. Friday, April 9, 1976 The HOYA Page S·9 ItQliQn Intensive Basic Italian Portuguese Professor Severino 'l'his course . received very favorable ratings. Students enjoyed the Intens. Basic Portuguese Intens. Adv. Portuguese professor's presentation and found him to be extremely helpful. The work Professor Rameh . Professor Zamarin wasinteresting and consisted of homework and tests; grading was fa!r. The format for this course is mostly lecture with intermittent discussion. Intensive Advanced Portuguese is a highly recommended course, as is the Everyone agrees that Dr. Rameh is an excellent professor: easy to understand, professor, Laura Zamarin. The assignments are fair and not too demanding Intensive Basic Italian having a very good command over the material presented, having a good and the grades are a Tair reflection of the students' abilities. The class is Professor Corsetti . attitude towards the· course, easily acceSSible, etc. Her examinations and mostly taught through lectures except in the bi·weekly dnll classes. Most students were enthusiastic about the course. The instructor grades are fair, while her workload isn't too demanding. On a 1.0 to 4.0 scale, Unfortunately, this year's drill instructor seems to have been somewhat of a demonstrated a positive attitude towards the class and was always willing to Dr. Rameh was rated the highest-4.0. An excellent course taught by an failure, as not many students liked her teaching methods nor her attitude help students. Work consisted of class participation, homework and tests; excellent professor. towards the course. This, however, has not reflected badly on Prof. Zamarin. grading was fair. The class rated her a stable 3.6 our of 4.0. Portuguese Structure .1 ntensiveBasic Italian Professor Rameh Adv. Portuguese Compo Professor Stiller Conducted on a lecture/discussion basis, Dr. Rameh's course is highly Professor Zamarin This course received a very high rating. Students were enthusiastic about recommended to all Portuguese speaking students interested in Linguistics. Professor Zamarin conducts her Compo class via lectures and discussion. the teacher and the method of instruction. Course wor:it was comprised of She is tops in ller field and presents her material in a thorough and clear She is well organized and knows what she is talking about, conveying this homework and tests. Grading was fair. manner. Almost always available to her students, Dr. Rameh has a profound knowledge quite effectively to her students. Her course load is substantial, interest in her work. The workload for the course is comprised of a midterm with weekly compositionsrinterpretations, a midterm and a final. She grades Intensive Advanced Italian and final, an oral presentation and a short paper. Her exams are more than fairly and her assignments always relate to the material at hand. Given a 3.8 Professor Stiller fair, as are her grades. Obviously a competent professor, she was rated a high rating, Professor Zamarin's class is definitely recommended for all students Students were extremely enthusiastic about this class. The students liked 3.8. Definitely a good course. third year or above in Portuguese. the method of instruction and felt that the instructor demonstrated an excellent command of the subject matter. Course work consisted of History of the Portguese Language Contemp. Portuguese and Brazilian Lit. homework assignments, compositions, tests; grading was fair. Professor Ramell Professor Zamarin As a concise introduction to the development of the Portguese language, Conducted through lectures and discussions this course is recommended to Italian Tutorial Dr. Rameh's course is very good. She knows what she is talking about and has serious students interested in Literature. Prof. Zamarin is very knowledgeable Professors Stiller and Severino no difficulty conveying her, ideas. Her lectures are clear and precise and she in her field and has no problem conveying this knowledge to her students. Students unanimously praised this course, not only for an interesting and encourages discussion. Her workload isn't too heavy-an oral presentation, a She obviously enjoys teaching the course and makes herself readily available challenging subject matter but also for the enthusiasm demonstrated by both short written report and a final-and her exams and grades are quite fair. Dr. for private consultation. Her grades, as well as her exams, were fair. Her teachers as well. Coursework consisted of readings (short stories, a novel, Rameh was rated a high 3.S and her course was definitely recommended by workload is comprised of a mid·term and a final, along with various written articles), several written assignments per week, and class discussions. Students previous students. and/or oral presentations. Prof. Zamarin was rated a 3.5 out of a possible 4.0. found the course to be most useful to them, since the instructiors were very open towards accepting suggestions on tlle part of the students, not only with regard to the selection of subject matter, but also with the areas to be covered as well. Linguistics Introduction to Italian Literature and Style . Professor Glassman Morph and Syntax Phonetics and Phonemics Most students were extremely enthusiastic about this course. The work Professor Cook Professor S. Sara, S.J. load was comprised of reading short stories, class diSCUSSions, oral reports, The overall rating of the professor and the course was good. The students The instructor has an excellent command of the subject material. Father grammar and written compositions (sonte students would have liked to have felt that the instructor had a good command of the material, but could have Sara was generally available to his students and went so far as to give his organized his lectures better to convey his knowledge. The workload seen more written compositions). The students felt the instructor had a good private number to stUdents who desired to talk to him. The instructor has a consisted of exercises, two midterms, and a final. The course is recommended good attitude towards the course and the tests were very fair- and attitude both towards the students and the materials used in class. Tests were to those interested in lingUistics. representative of the subject material. The workload was comprised of four fair and grades reflected all aspects of the coursework involved. quizzes and a final. The course could be improved upon by more class Italian Culture and Civilization Seminar: Case Grammar discussion. Teacher rating: 3.10. As this course is required of Linguistics Professor Glassman Professor Cook majors and minors, perhaps the recommendation is irrelevant. It is The study of Italian culture and civilization, basically focusing on Most students were extremely enthusiastic about the seminar. Students recommended to those who have an interest in the subject. literature from the origins to the present (2 semesters). Most students really felt that the instructor demonstrated an excellent command of the subject enjoyed the course, and felt that the professor had a good attitude towards matter and showed a sincere interest in the students. The coursework Phonology I the students and was generally available to see them after class. The consisted of a project and a paper. Grading was fair. Father Sara coursework consisted of readings, a short paper, oral reports and two tests The format of the course was a seminar. All of the students felt the Language Teaching and Learning instructor had a good command of the material and conveyed this knowledge Petrarch and Boccaccio Professor Dato effectively. Father Sara was always available to his students and expressed a Professor Glassman The format of this course was lecture and discussion. The instructor had a good attitUde toward his course. The workload was comprised of projects An in-depth study of two major Italian writers of the 13th and 14th good command of the material, although his presentation was at times boring, consisting of an oral report. This course would be more effective if more centuries. Most stUdents highly recommend this class and highly praised the The instructor was available at posted office hours. Although the instructor current issues were given and if the course was given some prerequiSites. instructor. Coursework consisted of reading, literary criticism, one research had a fairly good attitude toward the course, the assignments were not always Father Sara was given a 3.8 rating on a 4.0 scale. This course was paper and a test. Grades fairly reflected student performance. pertinent to the classroom. The examinations were fair, but they did not recommended by all of the students as an excellent course for linguistics always reflect the subject matter. The workload was comprised of tests. The majors, masters, and Ph.D's. Novecento (20th Century Italian Literature) following suggestions were given as to how the course could be improved: Professor Severino more practical applications of class material, more organization in the ~ourse, Language and Culture Responses: 20 A survey course in 20th Century Italian Literature. Most students highly and a closer working relationship to the text. Teacher rating: 2.9. This course Professor Shukla recommend this class and feel that the professor was extremely knowledgable was recommended to those interested in teaching foreign· languages. It was T1Je format of the course was lecture. All of tile students felt that in the area. The professor showed great interest in the students and was suggested that perhaps the title of the course is misleading, as most of the Professor Shukla had an excellent command of the material, but he did not always available to the students. Coursework consisted of reading several course deals with the "learning" aspect of the course's title. con vey his knowledge effectively. The professor was available after class and novels, criticism, and one long paper. during his office hours. The students felt that he had a good attitude toward Methodology of Language Teaching his course. For the most part, the asSignments stimulated the students' Italian Dialectology Professor Dato interests, but not all of the students found the material relevant. All of the Professor DiPietro Most students felt that the instructor conveyed his knowledge of the students found the grading fair, but there were .no exams. The workload Most students found this course !!xtremely enjoyable and. ,useful to subject effectively.· The instructor was available to his students. The consisted of three papers and readings The largest complaint about the course students who have an interest in Italian linguistics. The professor . ,instructor maintained a good attitude .toward his course. The assignments was that Professor Shukla did not speak with much enthusiasm. The professor demonstrated great enthusiasm and showed a real interest in his students. stimulated the students and related to the material very well. The workload was given a 3.2 rating on a 4.0 scale. All of the students recommended the Coursework consisted mainly of class participation and preparation of was comprised of projects. Most students thought that the course could be course. homework aSSignments (usually some sort of a lingUistic problem). improved if the text were changed and the presentation better organized. Teacher rating: 3.5 The course was recommended mainly because of the Field Methods in Sociolinguistics learning through the exchange of ideas. Professor Shuy The instructor has a good command of the material and was available to Bil ingual ism his students. The instructor has a good attitude toward the course and his Japanese Professor DiPietro assignments stimulated the students and related to the material at hand. The The format of this course is lecture·discussion. The professor was almost workload was comprised of papers, field projects, and evaluations of research. Japanese Composition and Grammar always available to his students. The assignments were stimulating and were Teacher rating: 3.95. This course was very well recommended as an Professor H. Chu directly related to the subject material. The examination was graded introduction to Sociolinguistic field methods, as the course accomplishes its The instructor has an excellent command of the subject matter. Most extremely fairly and was related to he subject material. The workload was goal. students stated that the instructor was not available as often as the students comprised of five article reviews, one test, and a final paper. No suggestions desired. The professor's attitude toward his course was considered good, but were given as to how the course could be improved. Teacher rating: 3.9. The Sino-Tibetan Languages-Linguistics Seminar sometimes he was too preoccupied with his own research. The examinations course is recommended for those who have an interest in the field. Father Yang were fair and reflected the subject matter. The workload was comprised of The format of this course is comprised of lectures and seminars. The compositions, a mid.term, and a final. Many students felt that the course Contrastive Analysis instructor has an excellent command of the material and conveys it very could be improved if the class were divided into two sections because of the Professor DiPietro effectively. He has a good attitude toward the course and was more than great variety of Janguage competence levels. Teacller reaing:3.3. This course is The format of this course was lecture and discussion. The professor was willing to help his students whenever needed. Father Yang is most highly recommended to those with a sufficient command of the Japanese language. always available to his students. The assignments fairly reflected the material recommended. The assignments were well chosen and related to the material. at hand. The workload was comprised of homeworlr problems relating to the The workload included one test, an oral presentation and one paper, and the Japanese Structure text. No suggestions were given as to how to improve the course. Teacher grading was fair. This course is most highly recommended for those students Professor H. Chu rating: 3.9. The course was recommended by those who have an interest in interested in Chinese comparative linguistics. The format of this course was lecture. The instructor had a good command languages (the knowledge of one or more foreign languages is helpful) and to of the material and conveyed his knowledge effectively to his students. The those who have an interest in the field. Formal Systems in Linguistics Responses: 6 professor was available to his students. The assignments were stimulating and Professor Zarechnak related to the material at hand. The workload was comprised mainly of tests. Foundations of Education This course was rated very highly (3.8-4.0). All recommended this course. Nosuggestions were given as to how the professor could improve the course. Professor Herrmann The course matter was essential for further stUdies and stimulating. The Teacher rating: 4.0. The course was recommended by all students answering This instructor has an excellent command ofthe subject material and a grading was fair, the professor was available and had a good attitude. critique. Recommended because one can obtain an essential knowledge in the very effective manner of conveying it to his students, The instructor has Japanese language through this course. . neither office hours nor an office, but can be reached if necessary. The Semantics Responses: 18 instructor has a very good attitude toward his course and is very imaginative Professor Zarechnak Japanese Tutorial in his approach. Some students felt that the reading assignments were neither This course was given various ratings. Some felt there was no organization Professor H. Chu stimulating nor related to the material at hand. The examinations were and they didn't learn anything. Yet others felt there was enough freedom that The format of the course was in the tutorial·discussion style. The professor considered fair and accurate representations of the subject material. The they had time to do independent reading on the topic. All thought that Dr. was readily available. to his students and exhibited a very good attitude workload consisted of group discussions, readings, a mid-term and a final. Zarechnak knew the material well, but couldn't convey it effectively to the toward the course. The assignments were stimulating a!ld related to the Teacher rating: 3.64. The course was recommended as giving an excellent students. His average rating was 3.0. material at hand. The examinations were graded fairly and reflected the insight into the Public School system. The instructor can relate personal subject matter. The workload was comprised of homework, readings, a experiences into the classroom discussions. mid·term and a final. No suggestions were given as to how the course could be Advanced English·Spanish Translation Responses: 13 improved. Teacher rating: 4.0. The course is recommended as a very good Professor Roberto Aliaga personal aide (tutorial), with modern readings, and a generally flexible Introduction to Language This course was rated a 4.0. All recommend it highly. Some felt there schedule. Professor Napoli should be more work. The format of this course consisted of lectures and discussions. The Japanese Culture and Civilization instructor has an excellent command of the material and conveys it Consecutive Interpreting Professor Komatsu effectively although sometimes too quickly. Her attitude toward the course is Professors M. and D. Bowen The format of this course was readings, translations and discussion. Tlle very enthusiastic and she was always available to her students whenever This course is highly recommended by all the students. Both professors instructor had an excellent command of the material. The instructor had a needed. Dr. Napoli is most highly recommended. The workload consisted of were felt to have an excellent command of the material and were able to very good attitude toward and course and was more than willing to help her weekly homework and two tests. The assignments related well to the material convey their knowledge very satisfactOrily. Both professors made themselves students. The assignments were very stimulating. The workload was and the grading was very fair. This course is highly recommended because it is available to the students and had an excellent attitude towards the course. comprised of daily translations and a final. Teacher rating: 4.0. The course an excellent introduction to phonology and sentence structure, and is The course is highly recommended to those students wishing to pursue a was recommended. The course provided an excellent exposure to Japanese presented in a casual and relaxed atmosphere. career in interpreting. culture while at the same time increased vocabulary acquisition and ,reading skills. Generative Syntax Introduction to Language Professor Napoli Professor Zarechnak Japanese Literature and Style The format of this course consists consists of lectures and discussions. The Most students rated this course quite highly. This is a required course for Professor Komatsu instructor has an .excellent command of the material and conveys it extremely all SLL students, and the students appreciated the fact that the instructor The' instructor had an excellent command of the material. She was effectively. Her attitude toward the course was always enthusiastic and she went out of his way to make the course as interesting as possible and tried to available to her students at all times. The instructor had a very enthusiastic was always available to her students whenever needed. Dr. Napoli is most give them several options so they could work with things that interested them attitude toward the course. The assignments were stimulating and related to highly recommended. The workload was comprised of homework assignments most. Many students complained about the text. Coursework consisted of the subject material at hand. Daily translations comprised the workload. It which were interesting and related well to the material, and the grading was lectures, class discussion, tests andror short papers; grading was fair. was suggested that the course could be improved upon if the teacher would all fair. This course is most highly recommended, for it is an excellent use more Japanese in her explanations. Teacher rating: 3.8. The course is introduction to syntax. Phonetics and Phonemics recommended as an excellent introduction to Japanese literature and an Father Sara excellent exercise in the Japanese language. A reqUired course for linguistiCS majors or minors. Most students felt this Teaching English as a Foreign Language course was reasonably interesting. The students felt that the instructor Intensive Advanced Japanese Professor Lado demonstrated an interest in his students and that tests and grades were fair. Professor Suzuki This instructor has an excellent command of the subject material and Several tests/homework assignments. The format of this course is lecture·discussion. The teacller has an conveyed his knowledge of the material effectively. The professor was excellent command of the subject material. The professor was available to available to his students during posted office hours. His attitude was good students. The professor had a very enthusiastic attitude toward the course. towards the course. The class assignments were stimulating and related to the Ru ssian· English Translation The assignments were very stimulating and challep.ging. The workload material at hand. The grades and examinations were fair and were related to Professor Grever comprised of of quizzes, readings and short exercises. Teacher rating: 3.5. It the subject matter. The workload was comprised of five article reviews, two The majority of the students who took this course found it to be was suggested that the textbook be changed and more conversation in tlle tests, a project and an exam. The course could be improved by the addition extremely useful. The aSSignments were relatively demanding but all of the classroom be encouraged. The course is recommended. The class has a relaxed of more practicum into the course. Teacher rating: 3.00. This course was students felt they had made substantial progress by the end of the semester. atmosphere. Most students felt a need for more conversation, as opposed to recommended as an excellent introduction to teaching English as a foreign The students found the instructor to be extremely helpful and the grades reading and writing. language to those who have an interest in this field. were fair. Page S·10 The HOYA Friday, April 9, 1976 mQthemntics NUlsing Introduction to College Math Responses: 30 Statistics and Calculus I Res es: 20- Patterns of Response to Health Situations Professor Centola Professor Benke Professor Ayers This course was taught in a ~ecture/discussion format and although the This course was a lecture one, with several tests, homework and a final This is a required course f9r junior year nursing students. The lectures are teacher was a first·year grad student with little teaching experience, the compriSing the requirements. The course was considered a demanding one, team·taught, but Professor AYers was highly recommended for the discussion students were highly enthusiastic about her. She was cited for her excellent with the tests judged fair but hard. Dr. Benke was thought to be generally and clinical. She had a very good command of the materi81, and was easily attitude towards the course and her personable manner made her easily open and interested in students, with a fair presentation of the material available to the stUdents. The assignments consisted' of readings, clinical, and approachable and always willing to help. The students found her very patient backed by a solid command of it. He had a good attitude towards the course a tenn paper which most students found very difficult. The genellll. feeling and accommodating. The course workload consisted of four tests, graded and generally was interested in the mastery of the material by the students. was that Ayers was the best of the other team members. Her over-all rating homework and several quizzes. The grading was considered extremely fair and The critiues appeared biased, because if the student liked the teacher, he liked was a 3.9 to 4.0. the only complaint registered against the course was that it moved slowly at the course. But on the average, the course was not recommended unless one times. The course was highly recommended for those who desire a good was interested in a course such as this. Intro to Basics of Medical Science revieew of basic math skills before moving on to a calculus course. In fact, Staff some students recommended the course only if Miss Centola was the teacher. This course carried many negative critiques. It is a required course and Calculus and Analytical Geometry Responses: 18 unless the professors involved shape up, there will be much dissatisfaction Introduction to Calculus Responses: 10 Professor Sandefur among nursing students. The major complaint concerns the ineffective Professor Lagnese The course was conducted by lecture, with the professor judged to have a manner in which knowledge of the subject was transmitted, although all of The course was conducted in a lecture mode and the course workload strong grasp of the material. He failed, though, at times, to make the concepts the professors had a good command of the materiaL Students complained of consisted of five tests and a final exam. Although Dr. Lagnese appeared to clearly understood. This was about the only complaint. But he welcomed disorganization, not enough time; and tests which did not con-elate with the, have a good grasp of the material, most of the critiques noted that he had a questions and was always approachable and available to students. He was lecture guides and the study material. The work load consisted of quizzes and difficulty in relating the material clearly to 'the students. Most students called interested in students and took a very good attitude toward his course. The tests. Overall, most felt this course could be excellent, informing, and him vague and unclear. Personally, the students found him to be very exams and grades were judged to be very fair but demanding. The general pertinent if the professors could get together and bring some structure and approachable and always available and he possessed a very good attitude recommendation was that this was mostly a required course and was organization with them to class. Students rated the course with a 2.5. toward the course. But in his teaching method, he was criticized for a lack of worthwhile to others if interested in math. But most respondents said that it concentration on actual problem solving, for he took too much time' and' would take a hardworking, serious student with a good background in math Geriatric Elective emphasis on proofs. The students felt that he should slow down and direct to tackle the course. Professor Marten himself toward achieving a knowledge within his students and not just cover By an overwhelming consensus, Professor Marten ,received a very high' the material. There was unanimous consent in the critiques that the rating in all aspects of the critique. She had a good command of the material, conveyance of the material was lacking. The class was split on recommending' Intro. to Computer/Fortran Responses: 40 and conveyed this knowledge effectively, always with a keen sense of both the course, mostly because of the reasons described above. ,Professor Maisel the students and the material. The work load was comprised of films and one The course was a lecture format, complemented by use of the Georgetown project which students found stimulating and interesting. This course is Introduction to Statistics Responses: 25 computer. Most students found this course to be a valuable one, in that wasa highly recommended not only for nursing students but for all interested in Professor Teller very good introduction to computers. The teacher was very good and he had the elderly. This course was given a rating of 4.0. This course was a lecture one, with several tests and a final. Dr. Teller was the command of the material and the ability to convey it. Assignments wie th.ought to have a good command of the material but did not always relate his computer were judged very stimulating and very useful. Grades and exams Delivery of Health Care knowledge and the subject matter very effectively. The students liked him were considered fair and the professor was always willing to help the Professor Shaw personally, finding him very approachable and always available. He possessed students. The course was highly recommended to anyone with any interest or Most of the students felt that Professor Shaw could have done a better job' an excellent attitude toward the course. Many students liked him but not the desire to learn the basics about computers. of commanding the class if it was held in a lecture format (it is a PSI course). course, taking it only because it was required. His tests were considered Work load consisted of twelve unit tests and one final. Assignments were demanding but very fair. Overall, the course was recommended, especially to related to tests, but most felt that the tests were a complete regurgitation of those likely to pursue other statistics courses in their field of study. Programming Languages Responses: 13 the articles read. They would have preferred a few subjective questions and Professor Tucker answers. The major criticism of the course was that the objectives on study Probability and Statistics Responses: 15 The course was a lecturejdiscussionformat with a workload comprising guides were questionable and seldom understood. For this reason, wme Professor Stokes two tests, four computer projects and papers to accompany those projects. discussion would have been helpful. The,overall rating for Professor Shaw was The course was taught by lecture, with the requirements being three tests There were too many complaints over the competency of the teacher to teach 3.0. and a final. Dr. Stokes was judged to have an excellent command of the this particular course. Although he was very friendly, available, and possessed material but he had difficulty in conveying it. The students had a very high a great attitude towards the course, his teaching was suspect. Students Patterns of Response to Health Situations opinion of him personally, finding him extremely interested in them, always complained that his knowledge was very surface that he was unable to Professor Buder available and easily approached. But most of the complaints centered on his answer questions very well, denoting a lack of information. His command of The format of this course involves discussion, lectures, and a clinical. teaching method. The consensus of the critiques was that he couldn't explain the material was weak and he had difficulty conveying it. Lectures were Professor Buder was considered by most as faving a good command of the the concepts very well and that he taught on a level higher than most of the ill·prepared and students immediately noticed this fact. The lectures were material and capable of communicating it well. Her office time was the students CQuid comprehend. The exams were judged to be very difficult and described as boring, disorganized and lacking any real depth information. stUdent's time. She encouraged students to come and talk with her. In general very long. And the text for the course was seen by many as very confusing, The text was criticized for its confusion and vagueness and the material the assignments were thought to be repetitive and extensive, with not enough and over half of the critiques called for a new text. The course was not covered was c:onsidered too much and too shallow for any real understanding. time to get the most out of them. There was one final, one paper, one clinical recommended except to math majors or serious students interested in The recommendation for this course was for only those persons with a prior experience, with objectives and journals. Overall rating was a 3.6. statistics. The general opinion was that Dr. Stokes was a great guy but his experience in programming and computers and even those people were teaching was less than desirable. advised that they better be ready to put up with a boring and dry course. Patterns of Response Professors Marten, Ayers, Buder, Weicker All of the instructors had a good command of the material but conveyance of the knowledge was at times poor. The teachers were very approachable, Theology Philosophy but not available. The course consisted of one final, papers, and the clinical setting. The rating of the professors ranged from 3.0 to 4.0. The course makes Jesuit Studies: History and Spirit Responses: 9 Introduction to Philosophy Responses: 43 out of 55 one aware of oneself and the patterns of response in relationship to the Professor Cioffi et al Professor Kordig people in the health situation. Mostsfud1!nts"were disapp'ointe'dwith this interdisciplinary 'adventure, yet " 'This waS il'lecturewith some discussion. It was generally agreed that Prof. they had hope that it would be lmpIOved next semestilr. The workload Kordig was both available to his students and had a good attitude towards the Patterns of Response consisted of a number of readings and lectures from numerous members of course. The course requirements were a midterm and a final exam. It was Professor Weicker , the Jesuit community. Grades were determined by an oral examination, often remarked that there was a lot of reading and the books were given a Although this is ,a required course the class would generally recommend it which most students felt was an unfair trivia test, two short papers, and one mixed opinion. Dr. Kordig was given an overa! rating of approximately 3.0. to others. The professor is very good at conveying the material and making it 10·15 page paper. The major complaint with the course was that at times it interesting. She is usually available and very approachable. The work load Il'!troduction to Philosophy Responses: 37 out of 167 consists of papers, exams, and reading assignments. Most students feel that l~ck~d organization, especially;s,ome. o,f, t~e lectures. When it was organized, most students found it very enjoyable.' 'All the professors involved were Professor Desan j, the work is stimulating, but almost all agree that the work load is too heavy. thought to have a good command of their 'areas, o(expertise. Most students , Dr. Desan's course is a 2·hour lecture and a l·hour group discussion per requested more material concerning Jesuit spirituality be included and less week. It, was unanimous that Dr. Desan had both an excellent command of Age and Role Jesuit history. The professors seemed sensitive to the students' criticisms. One the material and conveyed the material similarly. He and his teaching assistant Professor Aldrich student noted, "I think you should take into consideration the fact that this were always available to stUdents. The course consisted of 2 exams and a Professor Aldrich was considered by most as not having a good command course is brand new and n.eeds a chance to develop. It has good potential." final. Dr. Desan received an overall rating of 4.0. Respondants often pointed of the class. Her changing expectations and confusion were but some of the out that Dr. Desan makes a difficult subject easy and enjoyable to complaints received, Her attitude might have been good, but it was felt that Teilhard de Chardin and Theories of Evolution Responses: 25 understand. Obviously, this course is always recommended for introductory she did not promote this to the students. Exams did reflect the subject matter Professor King philosophy. but her preference to individual stUdents in grading according to this personal Fr. King received high praise from nearly all his students. He has an favoritism were major complaints. Being Professor Aldrich's first year, and excellent knowledge of this particular areaa, is excited by it, communicates Political Philosophy-Plato Responses: 10 out of 15 new to the S·C theory, some of her inadequacies are understandable. She was his enthusiasm to his stUdents, and is readily available to them. The workload Professor Bradley rated 1.2 overall and many felt she had the potential for improvement. was thought to be demanding but not overbearing. Eight books were read. The course was a seminar and consisted of oral presentations and a paper. Some were described as "very heavy." There were 3·4 non·cumulative tests All respondants said Fr. Bradley had an excellent command of the material Age and Role during the semester and one 7·9 page subjective paper. Examinations were and conveyed it well. He was also readily available to his students. He had a Professor Dear indicative of the material and grades were just. good attitude towards the course and was given an overall rating of 3.5. The Professor Dear has a superb command of the material and good Nearly all students highly recommended this though·provoking course and course was recommended only for those students who desired a very detailed communication with the students. She has much to offer and is very the professor. understanding of political philosophy, especially in The Republic. supportive of students. She is approachable though her time is limited by being active in student and curriculum affairs. Workload consists of one Problem of God Responses: 34 Ethics and Biomedicine Responses: 54 out of 69 paper, one final, and clinical with journals and designs. Most were happy with Professor Ryan Professor Beauchamp her, and felt they leared a lot. Professor Dear was rated as excellent with a This course was enjoyed by most students. It is well organized and well The course and the professor were well·received by students. Most found 4.0. conducted by Fr. Ryan. The professor knows the material and is open to the the professor intelligent, interested, and available for consultation. The course thoughts and concerns of his students. material was described as relevant and interesting, especially to pre·medical Six tests, one of which may be eliminated by the student, were required. and nursing students. The evaluation was based upon a two·part midterm and Although this may seem like many examinations, surprisingly no one a final examination. The tests required a lot of thought from students. The complained about it in the critiques. Tests and grades were fair and grading, done by a teaching assistant, was described as too harsh. Students CAMPUS CAMPUS MINISTRIES BRINGS YOU adequately covered the material. The readings were found to be difficult to were permiteed to do an optional paper for extra credit. understand. Some suggestions for changes in the reading material were made. The readings were found to be stimUlating and thought.provoking. One PASSOVER/HOLY WEEK/EASTER SERVICES Nevertheless, most of the readings were termed "good." critique stated, "When one walks away from the tests, one realizes this course The students recommended the course but requested more discussion be makes more sense than any other course one has taken. It has forced me to included when it is taught again. Some expressed a dislike for the course, but think to the fullest, and to order my values." The course is highly JEWISH only because it was a requirement. recommended. ECUMENICAL SEDER Introduction to Jewish Life and Thought Responses: 37 History of Ancient Philosophy Responses: 18 out of 34 Tuesday, April 13, 7:00PM Profe~50r White Professor Callahan Reservations: Campus Ministry Office #113 Healy A large majority of the students found Rabbi White to be an effective and Professor Callahan had an excellent command of the subject matter, knowledgeable lecturer. The professor's overall average rating was a 3.9. "He generally he conveyed his knowledge effectively, and had o::lly a fair attitude PASSOVER SEDER, is a very friendly man and his class is pleasant," one stUdent wrote. toward the course. A number of students felt the material to be dry and Wednesday, April 14, 7:00PM The course covers the basics of Jewish rituals and the meanings behind uninteresting, especially the readings. The lectures, which lasted one·and·a· them. The workload consisted of several readings, a midterm and a final half hours, may have contributed to this feeling. The workload consisted of Reservations: }SA, 3612 N St. 625-3175 examination. The tests were graded fairly and required "tho\lght and the usual midterm and final examination. Examinations and grades were imagination," rather than rote repetition of facts. A very small number of termed fair by most. Student comments about the course were generally PROTESTANT. students objected to the tests since they felt they were measuring creativity sparse. MAUNDY THURSDAY rather than knowledge. The students generally recommended the course but only for those who Celebration of the Lord's Supper, 9:30 PM The course was highly recommended because it was very "enjoyable and are deeply interested in the subject matter. Harbin Music Lounge informative." In1roduction to Philosophy Responses: 80 out of 167 Seminar: Catholicism and History Responses: 6 out of 8 Professor Desan , ROMAN CATHOLIC Professors McDermott and Broxson This seems to be the most highly rated philosophy surveyed this year. Sacrament of Penance and Reconciliation: Mon Although this was a seminar, and Professors McDermott and Broxson There were two lectures by the professor each week and one small discussion day, Tuesday, Wednesday (in addition to the regu lectures infrequently, when they did, nearly all those responding stated that group meet with the teaching assistants each week. The professor is described lar schedule) from 7:00 to 9:00 PM. Each period be Fr. McDermott had a much better command of the material and conveyed it as very knowledgeable, witty, entertaining, and having -an excellent attitude more effectively than Dr. Broxson. The course consisted of 4 short papers toward the course. Over half the students gave the professor a 4.0 overall gins with a brief Service of the Word. and no exams, but weekly oral presentations were expected. Some rating. And considering the large size of the class, the course was very well HOL Y THURSDAY respondents felt the course could be better organized. Fr. McDermott was organized. A small number of students objected to the style of a few of the given an overall rating of 3.6 while Dr. Broxson received a rating of 2.4. teaching assistants and complained about a discrepancy between the grading Evening Mass of the Lord's supper, 5:15 PM Systematic Theology I Responses: 6 out of 7 philosophies of the TA's. In spite of this, the vast majority still very highly GOOD FRIDAY Professor Thomasson recommended the course. Way of the Cross, 12:00 noon The course is a combination lecture/seminar. The respondents were Most felt the reading material was difficult to understand. There were two virtually unanimous in saying that Dr. Thomasson had an excellent command tests and a final examination. The workload consisted of reading six books. Celebration of the Lord's Passion, 3:00 PM Grades and tests were considered fair generally. The final was worth fifty of a very difficult subject and conveyed it just as well. He was always readily EASTER SVNDA Y available to his students and had an excellent attitude toward the course. percent of the final grade. There was a take·home final exam and a portfolio to keep on the readings "Desan," one student wrote, "is a MUST as far as professors at GU go." Easter Vigil, 5:00 AM (Starting at Healy Circle) which were extensive. (Some requested that the reading load be reduced.) Dr. The course is highly worthwhile taking. Easter Sunday Masses: Thomasson was given an overall rating of 3.9 and the course was highly 10 and 11 AM, 12 noon recommended for students with a serious interest in theology. ' Good and Evil Responses: 44 out of 64 Professor Porrecco 9:30 and 11:15PM Problem of God Responses: 35 out of 40 Most stUdents were not enthusiastic about htis course and found it to be All services will be held in Dahlgren Chapel Professor McKeown mediocre to good. The professor knew his material very well, but the The course consisted of lectures with some discussion. Respondents said presentation was lacking. The material was termed as "vague" and only RETREATS she had a very good command of the material and presented it well in class. slightly interesting. Nevertheless, the professor was available to his students "Tomb Time" - Good Friday evening to the Easter Dr. McKeown was available to her students and had a very good attitude and had a good attitude toward the course. The testing consisted of a towards the course. Some respondents said they would prefer a more varied midterm, a group project which required a class presentation, and a Morning Vigil Urbana, MD. Contact our office for reading list, which is 5 autobiographies. The course required two short papers, take-home final examination. These were considered fair as were the grades. reservations. a midterm and a final exam. Dr. McKeown was given an overall rating of The workload was not found to be very demanding. approximately 3.6. While the course is recommended, it was suggested a Most stUdents recommended the course because they were either pleased FOR FURTHER INFO CALL 625-3022 number of times that the reading list be modified. with it or because it was adequate to fulfill their philosophy reqUirement.