Heritage Trees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heritage Trees Appendix A – Plan Change Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan Schedule of Changes Where text is proposed to be added to the Plan, it has been shown as underlined. Where text is to be deleted from the Plan it has been shown with a line through it. Where text is shown in the following schedule without any underlining or strikethrough, it is existing text from the Plan and has been included for context and to assist the reader in determining where the changes occur, and does not form part of the plan change. Volume 2: Appendix A Register of Significant Heritage Resources Insert the following at the appropriate point in Appendix A: Heritage Trees Planning Name Location Common Name RNZIH Map Registration Notation Number 53 Quercus robur 22 Broadway Picton Lot 1 DP English oak 251 3000 54 Quercus coccinea 35 South Terrace, Picton Lot Scarlet oak 187 2 DP 2074 55 Quercus robur rubra Cnr Kent and Buller Streets Red oak 181 Sec 627 Town of Picton SO 2890 & Road Reserve 56 Quercus coccinea Picton Police Station, Picton Scarlet oak 186 Road Reserve adjoining 36 Broadway 57 Sequoiadendron Nelson Square, Picton Road Wellingtonia (2) 171, 172 giganteum Reserve 58 Podocarpus totara Picton School Grounds, 5 Totara 179 Buller St, Picton Sec 637 Town of Picton and Road Reserve 59 Kunzea ericoides 29A Ranui Street, Picton lot Kanuka 195 17 DP 4646 60 Quercus robur 1 Sussex Street, Picton Pt Lot English oak 313 2 DP 1855 61 Juglans regia Rev Samuel Ironside Walnut 269 Memorial, Ngakuta Bay 62 Metrosideros excelsa Oyster Bay Farm, Port Pohutukawa 272 Underwood Lot 7 DP 8632 63 Dacrycarpus Te Mara, Double Bay, Kahikatea dacrydioides Kenepuru 64 Sequoiadendron 348 Waikawa Road, Picton Wellingtonia giganteum Lot 3 DP 1228 65 Sophora micropylla 27 Devon Street, Picton Sec Kowhai 645 Town of Picton 66 Sophora micropylla 11 Nelson Square, Picton Sec Kowhai 696 Town of Picton 67 Quercus coccinea Picton Foreshore Reserve Scarlet Oak (2) Appendices – Heritage Tree Update 68 Dacrycarpus McKormicks Road, Kahikitea dacrydioides Whatamango Bay 69 Quercus robur Waikawa Road, Waikawa Bay English Oak 70 Eucalyptus sp. Hampden Street, Picton Gum 71 Agathis australis 8 Taranaki Street, Picton Lot Kauri 2 DP 1126 72 Dacrydium 8 Taranaki Street, Picton Lot Rimu cupressinum 2 DP 1126 73 Podocarpus totara 8 Taranaki Street, Picton Lot Totara 2 DP 1126 74 Nothofagus 11 Broadway, Picton Lot 3 DP Beech (2) 1126 75 Kunzea ericoides 11 Broadway, Picton Lot 3 DP Kanuka 1126 76 Pittosporum 11 Broadway, Picton Lot 3 DP Lemonwood eugenoides 1126 77 Dacrydium 11 Broadway, Picton Lot 3 DP Rimu cupressinum 1126 78 Psuedopanax 11 Broadway, Picton Lot 3 DP Lancewood crassifoliium 1126 79 Nothofagus solandri 53 Waikawa Road, Picton Lot Mountain Beech var ‘Cliffortioides’ 1 DP 8717 80 Quercus cerris 38 York Street, Picton Lot 1 Turkey oak 180 DP 3783 81 Fraxinus excelsior 38 York Street, Picton Lot 1 Common Ash DP 3783 82 Ulmus minor Louis 38 York Street, Picton Lot 1 Golden Elm van Houtte DP 3783 83 Kowhai 38 York Street, Picton Lot 1 Kowhai DP 3783 84 Fraxinus raywoodii 38 York Street, Picton Lot 1 Claret Ash 175 DP 3783 85 Nothofagus menziesii 94 Wellington Street, Picton Silver beech Lot 2 DP 801 86 Magnolia grandiflora 123 Wellington Street, Picton Evergreen magnolia Sec 308 Town of Picton 87 Betula pendula 34 Broadway Picton Lot 2 DP Silver birch 8811 88 Podocarpus totara Fifth Bank Wellington Street, Totara Picton 89 Quercus palustris 10 Newgate Street, Picton Lot Pin oak 1 DP 3209 90 Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Newgate Street, Picton Lot Tulip tree (2) 1 DP 3209 Page 2 Appendices – Heritage Tree Update Appendix B – Plan Change Wairau/Awatere Resource Management Plan Volume 2: Appendix A Register of Significant Heritage Resources Insert the following at the appropriate point in Appendix A: Heritage Trees Planning Name Location Common Name RNZIH Map Registration Notation Number 1. Eucalyptus obliqua ‘Hawkesbury Vineyard’, Messmate gum 189 Hawkesbury Road, Renwick 2. Araucaria bodwillii ‘Sandhills’, Main Bunya bunya Blenheim/Picton Highway 3. Abies nordammiana ‘Seven Oaks’, 106 Brookby Caucasian fir 129 (see also 150) Road, Hawkesbury near Renwick 4. Picea smithiana ‘Seven Oaks’, 106 Brookby Himalayan spruce 130 Road, Hawkesbury near Renwick 5. Picea abies ‘Seven Oaks’, Brookby Road, Norway spruce 131 Hawkesbury near Renwick 6. Pseudotsuga ‘Seven Oaks’, 106 Brookby Douglas fir 132 menziesii Road, Hawkesbury near Renwick 7. Cedrus deodara ‘Seven Oaks’, 106 Brookby Deodar 133 Road, Hawkesbury near Renwick 8. Ulmus procera 108 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Elm 024a (see also 151-152) 9. Sequoiadendron 108 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Wellingtonia 024b giganteum 10. Aesculus 108 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Horse chestnut 024c hippocastanum 11. Magnolia grandiflora 108 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Evergreen magnolia 024d 12. Tilia x europea 108 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Lime (6) 025e 13. Sequoiadendron 16 Bank Street, Blenheim Wellingtonia (2) 175 giganteum 14. Sequoia 19 Purkiss Street, Blenheim Redwood 174 sempervirens 15. Liquidamba 22 Weld Street, Blenheim Sweet gum 293a styraciflua 16. Quercus robur 22 Weld Street, Blenheim Oak (4) 293b 17. Quercus rubra 22 Weld Street, Blenheim Red oak 293c 18. Juglans regia 22 Weld Street, Blenheim Walnut (4) 293d 19. Sequoiadendron 25 Percy Street, Blenheim Wellingtonia 038 giganteum 20. Sequoiadendron 70 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Wellingtonia 023a giganteum Page 3 Appendices – Heritage Tree Update 21. Cinnamomum 70 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Camphor tree 023b camphora 22. Gingko biloba 70 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Ginkgo 023c 23. Betula pendula 70 Maxwell Road, Blenheim Silver birch 023d 24. Tilia x europaea 75 Litchfield Street, Blenheim Lime 25. Quercus rubra 75 Litchfield Street, Blenheim Red oak 26. Liquidamba 80 Nelson Street, Sweet gum styraciflua Springlands, Blenheim 27. Schinus molle 80 Nelson Street, Pepper tree 260b Springlands, Blenheim 28. Aesculus x carnea 80 Nelson Street, Red horse chestnut Springlands, Blenheim 29. Platanus x acerifolia 80 Nelson Street, 40 Kingwell London plan (2) 260d Drive, Springlands, Blenheim 30. Liriodendron tulipifera 80 Nelson Street, 40 Kingwell Tulip tree 260e Drive, Springlands, Blenheim 31. Quercus rubra 80 Nelson Street, Red oak 260f Springlands, Blenheim 32. Acer campestre 80 Nelson Street, Field maple Springlands, Blenheim 33. Tilia x europaea 80A Nelson Street, Lime 259 Springlands, Blenheim 34. Sequoia 84 Nelson Street, Redwood 253a sempervirens Springlands, Blenheim (see also 154 - 155) 35. Taxodium ascendens 84 Nelson Street, Pond Swamp cypress 253b distichum Springlands, Blenheim (2) 36. Gingko biloba 84 Nelson Street, Maidenhair tree 253c Springlands, Blenheim 37. Quercus robur (see Bethsaida Home, Litchfield Oak (2) 182 also 156 - 157) Street, Blenheim 38. Juglans regia Blenheim School, 42 Alfred Walnut 292a Street, Blenheim 39. Acer pseudoplatanus Blenheim School, 42 Alfred Sycamore 292b Street, Blenheim 40. Quercus robur Blenheim School, 42 Alfred Oak 292c Street, Blenheim 41. Platanus x acerifolia Blenheim/Picton State London plane (7) 163 Highway 1 42. Eucaluptus viminalis Burleigh Park, New Renwick Manna gum 177 Road, Blenheim 43. Quercus robur Church of the Nativity, Alfred Oak 203 Street, Blenheim 44. Ulmus procera Church of the Nativity, Alfred Elm Street, Blenheim 45. Sophora japonica Cnr Budge and Shirtliff Pagoda tree 176 Streets, Blenheim 46. Cedrus deodara Eltham Road Reserve, Deodar 035a Blenheim 47. Sequoia Eltham Road Reserve, Redwood 035b sempervirens Blenheim 48. Liriodendron tulipfera Eltham Road Reserve, Tulip tree 035c Blenheim Page 4 Appendices – Heritage Tree Update 49. Palatanus x acerifolia Eltham Road Reserve, London plan 035d Blenheim 50. Eucalyptus viminalis Fairhall Homestead, Manna gum 188 Woodbourne, Blenheim (see also 158-161) The Woodbourne Homestead, Fairhall, Blenheim 51. Quercus robur Fairhall Homestead, Oak 190 Woodbourne, Blenheim The Woodbourne Homestead, Fairhall, Blenheim 52. Nestegis lanceolata Freeths Road, Koromiko White maire (59) 273a 53. Nothofagus solandri Freeths Road, Koromiko Mountain beech (14) 273b var. ‘Cliffortioides’ 54. Podocarpus hallii Freeths Road, Koromiko Hall’s Totara (59) 273c syn. Cunninghamii 55. Quercus robur Hillersden Farm, Wairau Oak 274c Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 56. Pseudotsuga Hillersden Farm, Wairau Douglas fir (10) 274g menziesii Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 57. Tilia x europaea Hillersden Farm, Wairau Lime (3) 274a Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 58. Aesculus Hillersden Farm, Wairau Horse chestnut (2) 274b hippocastanum Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 59. Quercus petraea Hillersden Farm, Wairau Sessile oak 274d Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 60. Quercus coccinea Hillersden Farm, Wairau Scarlet oak 274e Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 61. Quercus rubra Hillersden Farm, Wairau Oak Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 62. Quercus petraea Hillersden Farm, Wairau Sessile oak Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 63. Quercus coccinea Hillersden Farm, Wairau Scarlet oak Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 64. Quercus rubra Hillersden Farm, Wairau Red oak 274f Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 65. Pseudotsuga Hillersden Farm, Wairau Douglas fir 252 menziesii Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 66. Sequoiadendron Hillersden Farm, Wairau Wellingtonia (10) 274h giganteum Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 67. Cedrus atlantica Hillersden Farm, Wairau Atlas cedar 274j Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 68. Chamaecyparis Hillersden Farm, Wairau Nootka cypress 274k nootkatensis Valley, R D 1, Marlborough 69. Abies pinsapo Lake Timara near Renwick Spanish fir 128a (see also 165) 70. Catalpa bignonoides Lake Timara near Renwick Indian
Recommended publications
  • Podocarpus Totara
    Mike Marden and Chris Phillips [email protected] TTotaraotara Podocarpus totara INTRODUCTION AND METHODS Reasons for planting native trees include the enhancement of plant and animal biodiversity for conservation, establishment of a native cover on erosion-prone sites, improvement of water quality by revegetation of riparian areas and management for production of high quality timber. Signifi cant areas of the New Zealand landscape, both urban and rural, are being re-vegetated using native species. Many such plantings are on open sites where the aim is to quickly achieve canopy closure and often includes the planting of a mixture of shrubs and tree species concurrently. Previously, data have been presented showing the potential above- and below-ground growth performance of eleven native plant species considered typical early colonisers of bare ground, particularly in riparian areas (http://icm.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/land/Trial1results.asp). In this current series of posters we present data on the growth performance of six native conifer (kauri, rimu, totara, matai, miro, kahikatea) and two broadleaved hardwood (puriri, titoki) species most likely to succeed the early colonising species to become a major component in mature stands of indigenous forest (http://icm.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/land/ Trial2.asp). Data on the potential above- and below-ground early growth performance of colonising shrubby species together with that of conifer and broadleaved species will help land managers and community groups involved in re-vegetation projects in deciding the plant spacing and species mix most appropriate for the scale of planting and best suited to site conditions. Data are from a trial established in 2006 to assess the relative growth performance of native conifer and broadleaved hardwood tree species.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Beeches : Establishment, Growth and Management / Mark Smale, David Bergin and Greg Steward, Photography by Ian Platt
    Mark Smale, David K ....,.,. and Greg ~t:~·wa11.r Photography by lan P Reproduction of material in this Bulletin for non-commercial purposes is welcomed, providing there is appropriate acknowledgment of its source. To obtain further copies of this publication, or for information about other publications, please contact: Publications Officer Private Bag 3020 Rotorua New Zealand Telephone: +64 7 343 5899 Fac.rimile: +64 7 348 0952 E-nraif. publications@scionresearch .com !Pebsite: www.scionresearch.com National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data The New Zealand beeches : establishment, growth and management / Mark Smale, David Bergin and Greg Steward, Photography by Ian Platt. (New Zealand Indigenous Tree Bulletin, 1176-2632; no.6) Includes bibliographic references. 978-0-478-11018-0 1. trees. 2. Forest management-New Zealand. 3. Forests and forestry-New Zealand. 1. Smale, Mark, 1954- ll. Bergin, David, 1954- ill. Steward, Greg, 1961- IV. Series. V. New Zealand Forese Research Institute. 634.90993-dc 22 lSSN 1176-2632 ISBN 978-0-478-11038-3 ©New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited 2012 Production Team Teresa McConcbie, Natural Talent Design - design and layout Ian Platt- photography Sarah Davies, Richard Moberly, Scion - printing and production Paul Charters - editing DISCLAIMER In producing this Bulletin reasonable care has been taAren lo mmre tbat all statements represent the best infornJation available. Ht~~vever, tbe contents of this pt1blicatio11 are not i11tended to be a substitute for s,Pecific specialist advice on at!} matter and should not be relied on for that pury~ose. NEW ZEALAND FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE L!JWJTED mtd its emplqyees shall not be liable on at.ry ground for a'!)l lost, damage, or liabili!J inrorred as a direct or indirect result of at!J reliance l{y a'!)l person upon informatiou contained or opinions expressed in this tvork.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Before We Humans Were and Their Relatives Will Probably Be Here When We Are Gone
    The ‘mighty tōtara’ is one of our most extraordinary trees. Among the biggest and oldest trees in the New Zealand forest, the heart of Māori carving and culture, trailing no. 8 wire as fence posts on settler farms, clambered up in the Pureora protests of the 1980s: the story of New Zealand can be told through tōtara. Simpson tells that story like nobody else could. In words and pictures, through waka and leaves, farmers and carvers, he takes us deep inside the trees: their botany and evolution, their role in Māori life and lore, their uses by Pākehā, and their current status in our environment and culture. By doing so, Simpson illuminates the natural world and the story of Māori and Pākehā in this country. Our largest trees, the kauri Tāne Mahuta and the tōtara Pouakani, are both thought to be around 1000 years old. They were here before we humans were and their relatives will probably be here when we are gone. Tōtara has been central to life in this country for thousands of years. This book tells a great tree’s story, and that is our story too. Philip Simpson is a botanist and author of Dancing Leaves: The Story of New Zealand’s Cabbage Tree, Tī Kōuka (Canterbury University Press, 2000) and Pōhutukawa and Rātā: New Zealand’s Iron-hearted Trees (Te Papa Press, 2005). Both books won Montana Book Awards in the Environment category and Pōhutukawa and Rātā also won the Montana Medal for best non-fiction book. Simpson is unique in his ability to combine the scientific expertise of the trained botanist with a writer’s ability to understand the history of Māori and Pākehā interactions with the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Assessment of Radiata Pine, Rimu, and Mānuka
    Pizzirani et al. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science (2019) 49:5 https://doi.org/10.33494/nzjfs492019x44x E-ISSN: 1179-5395 Published on-line: 20 June 2019 Research Article Open Access New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Exploring forestry options with Māori landowners: an economic assessment of radiata pine, rimu, and mānuka Stefania Pizzirani*1,2,3, Juan J. Monge1, Peter Hall1, Gregory A. Steward1, Les Dowling1, Phil Caskey4, Sarah J. McLaren2,3 1 Scion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua, 3046, New Zealand 2 Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand 3 New Zealand Life Cycle Management Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand 4 New Zealand Mānuka Group, 525b State Highway 30, Awakeri, Whakatane, 3191, New Zealand *corresponding author: Stefania Pizzirani: [email protected] (Received for publication 9 November 2017; accepted in revised form 6 May 2019) Abstract Background: A quarter of New Zealand’s land area is currently covered in indigenous forest although only indigenous forests on private land can be harvested. In addition, planted exotic forests (~90% Pinus radiata D.Don) cover a further 7% of the land, and these form the main basis of New Zealand’s forestry industry. However, some landowners are seeking to plant a more diverse range of species (including New Zealand indigenous species) that can be managed in different ways to produce a range of products. Methods: A “cradle-to-gate” life cycle-based economic assessment of three forestry scenarios was undertaken in (i.e. intensive management of radiata pine); (2) continuous-cover forestry management of the indigenous coniferous tree speciescollaboration rimu ( withDacrydium members cupressinum of Ngāti Porou, Lamb.); an and indigenous (3) intensive Māori production-scale tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated List of Species Used in Tree-Ring Research
    TREE-RING BULLETIN, Vol. 53, 1993 AN UPDATED LIST OF SPECIES USED IN TREE-RING RESEARCH HENRI D. GRISSINO-MAYER Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721, U.S.A. ABSTRACT During the past 100 years, researchers have investigated the potential of hundreds of tree and shrub species for use in applications of tree-ring research. Although several lists of species known to crossdate have been published, investigated species that do not crossdate are rarely included despite the usefulness of this infonnation for future research. This paper provides a list of the Latin and common names of 573 species that have been investigated in tree-ring research, infor­ mation on species known to crossdate, and information on species with measurement and/or chronology data in the International Tree-Ring Data Bank. In addition, a measure of the suitability of a species for future tree-ring applications, the Crossdating Index (CDI), is developed and pro­ posed for standard usage. 1n den letzten hundert J ahren haben Forscher das Potential von hunderten von Baum- und Buscharten fi.ir die Anwendung in der Jahresring-Forschung untersucht. Zahlreiche Listen mit Arten, von denen man wei~, da~ sie zeitlich korrespondieren, sind bereits veroffentlicht worden, dagegen sind untersuchte Arten, die nicht zeitlich korresponclieren, selten in Publikationen beriick­ sichtigt worden, obwohl diese Informationen fi.ir die kiinftige Forschung nutzvoll sein konnten. Dieser Artikel legt eine Liste der lateinischen und der gemeinen Narnen von 573 Arten vor, die im Rahmen der Jahresring-Forschung untersucht worden sind, Inforrnationen Uber Arten, die bekan­ nterweise zeitlich korrespondieren sowie Informationen iiber Arten mit Ma~- und/oder Chronologiedaten in der intemationalen Jahresring-Datenbank (International Tree-Ring Data Bank).
    [Show full text]
  • Totara Cover Front
    DISCLAIMER In producing this Bulletin reasonable care has been taken to ensure that all statements represent the best information available. However, the contents of this publication are not intended to be a substitute for specific specialist advice on any matter and should not be relied on for that purpose. NEW ZEALAND FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE LIMITED and its employees shall not be liable on any ground for any loss, damage, or liability incurred as a direct or indirect result of any reliance by any person upon information contained or opinions expressed in this work. To obtain further copies of this publication, or for information about Forest Research publications, please contact: Publications Officer Forest Research Private Bag 3020 Rotorua New Zealand telephone: +64 7 343 5899 facsimile: +64 7 343 5897 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.forestresearch.co.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data Bergin, D.O. (David O.) Totara establishment, growth, and management / David Bergin. (New Zealand Indigenous Tree Bulletin, 1176-2632; No.1) Includes bibliographic references. ISBN 0-478-11008-1 1. Podocarpus—New Zealand. 2. Forest management—New Zealand. I. New Zealand Forest Research Institute. II. Title. 585.3—dc 21 Production Team Jonathan Barran — photography Teresa McConchie — layout design John Smith — graphics Ruth Gadgil — technical editing Judy Griffith — editing and layout ISSN 1176-2632 ISBN 0-478-11008-1 © New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited 2003 Front cover insert: Emergent totara and younger trees along the forest edge in Pureora Forest Park, with mixed shrub species edging the picnic area in the foreground.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Scheduled Trees
    No Address Legal Description Description 75 Mesopotamia School Pt RS 2750 & Pt RS 4037 Pseudotsuga menziesii (2 Douglas Fir) 90 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Fagus sylvatica "Purpurea" (Copper Beech) 91 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Hoheria angustifolia (Houhi Puruhi) 92 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) 93 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) 94 52 Rae Rd Lot 1 DP 2842 Podocarpus totara "Pendula" (Weeping Totara) 95 Sowerby Rd RS 38936 Fagus sylvatica "Purpurea" (Copper Beech) 90 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Fagus sylvatica "Purpurea" (Copper Beech) 91 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Hoheria angustifolia (Houhi Puruhi) 92 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) 93 Tripp Settlement Rd RS 3308 Eucalyptus viminalis (Manna Gum) 94 52 Rae Rd Lot 1 DP 2842 Podocarpus totara "Pendula" (Weeping Totara) 95 Sowerby Rd RS 38936 Fagus sylvatica "Purpurea" (Copper Beech) 98 School Rd Lot 1 DP 7033 Nothofagus solandri var Cliffordiodes (Mountain Beech) 99 Raincliff Rd Pt RS 20125 & Pt RS Juglans regia (Walnut) 21148 102 Winchester-Hanging River Bed Sophora microphylla (Kowhai) Rock Rd 100 Railway Main South Railway Quercus robur, Fraxinus excelsior, Eucalyptus (Common Oak, Ash and Gums) 101 Railway Main South Railway Quercus robur, Fraxinus excelsior, Eucalyptus spp (Common Oak, Ash and Gums) 110 Station Rd Lot 1 DP 23188 Pinus radiata & Cupressus macrocarpa (Monterey Pines & Monterey Cypress) 100 Railway Main South Railway Quercus robur, Fraxinus excelsior, Eucalyptus (Common Oak, Ash
    [Show full text]
  • IAWA List of Microscopic Features for Softwood Identification 1
    IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 1 IAWA LIST OF MICROSCOPIC FEATURES FOR SOFTWOOD IDENTIFICATION IAWA Committee Pieter Baas – Leiden, The Netherlands Nadezhda Blokhina – Vladivostok, Russia Tomoyuki Fujii – Ibaraki, Japan Peter Gasson – Kew, UK Dietger Grosser – Munich, Germany Immo Heinz – Munich, Germany Jugo Ilic – South Clayton, Australia Jiang Xiaomei – Beijing, China Regis Miller – Madison, WI, USA Lee Ann Newsom – University Park, PA, USA Shuichi Noshiro – Ibaraki, Japan Hans Georg Richter – Hamburg, Germany Mitsuo Suzuki – Sendai, Japan Teresa Terrazas – Montecillo, Mexico Elisabeth Wheeler – Raleigh, NC, USA Alex Wiedenhoeft – Madison, WI, USA Edited by H.G. Richter, D. Grosser, I. Heinz & P.E. Gasson © 2004. IAWA Journal 25 (1): 1–70 Published for the International Association of Wood Anatomists at the Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden, The Netherlands 2 IAWA Journal, Vol. 25 (1), 2004 IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 3 2 IAWA Journal, Vol. 25 (1), 2004 IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 3 PREFACE A definitive list of anatomical features of softwoods has long been needed. The hard- wood list (IAWA Committee 1989) has been adopted throughout the world, not least because it provides a succinct, unambiguous illustrated glossary of hardwood charac- ters that can be used for a variety of purposes, not just identification. This publication is intended to do the same job for softwoods. Identifying softwoods relies on careful observation of a number of subtle characters, and great care has been taken to show high quality photomicrographs that remove most of the ambiguity that definitions alone would provide. Unlike the Hardwood Committee, the Softwood Committee never met in its full com- position.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Highlights
    G. Annual Report Highlights Industry focus Added value Regional development Annual Report Highlights Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to section 44 of the Public Finance Act 1989. Our Annual Report is presented in two parts – Highlights (Part A) and Reports and Financial Statements (Part B). Together both documents fulfil our annual reporting responsibilities under the Crown Research Institutes Act 1992. The Reports and Financial Statements (Part B) includes the employment and environmental reports, core funding investment, directors’ report, performance targets and financial statements. Our Annual Report is also available in digital format at www.scionresearch.com/annualreports Published by: Scion, 49 Sala Street, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand. www.scionresearch.com September 2015 © 2015 New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited trading as Scion. ISSN 1177-1763 (print version) ISSN 1178-5276 (online version) G. Contents Scion at a glance Chair and Chief Executive review: Strong confidence in forestry’s future Our science plan Research performance Working with Māori Reaching out Research collaborations Financial results summary Glossary OurProsperity from trees vision Mai i te ngahere oranga Scion’s purpose is to drive innovation and growth from New Zealand’s forestry, wood product and wood-derived materials and other biomaterial sectors to create economic value and contribute to beneficial environmental and social outcomes for New Zealand. Scion at a glance $ $ m .m . Total comprehensive Operating revenue Last year: $.m income Last year: $.m % . full-time equivalent staff Return on equity Last year: .% Rotorua Wellington Christchurch Dunedin published papers annual weighted average . commissioned reports H-index accepted by users citations per paper (rolling .
    [Show full text]
  • Visitors' Guide Trees in Orton Bradley Park. Main Park
    Tree list dated: September 2012 Visitors' Guide to the Trees in Orton Bradley Park. Main Park No. Botanical name. Common Name. 1. Eucalyptus globulus Tasmanian Blue Gum 2. Cedrus atlantica Atlas Cedar 3. Quercus ilex Holm Oak 4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 5. Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 6. Eucalyptus regnans Mountain Ash 7. Fagus sylvatica Common Beech 8. Ulmus glabra 'Lutescens' Golden Wych Elm 9. Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 10. Eucalyptus fastigata Brown Barrel 11. Ilex aquifolium Holly 12. Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar 13. Quercus robur hybrid 14. Abies pinsapo Spanish Fir 15. Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 16. Crataegus x prunifolia Hybrid Cockspur Thorn 17. Aesculus X carnea Red Horse Chestnut. 18. Gleditsia triacanthos Honey Locust 19. Juglans regia Common Walnut 20. Quercus robur English Oak 21. Sequoiadendron giganteum Sierra Redwood (Wellingtonia) 22. Quercus suber Cork Oak 23. Juglans nigra Black Walnut 24. Acer platanoides Norway Maple 25. Platanus orientalis Oriental Plane 26. Eucalyptus regnans Mountain Ash 27. Fraxinus excelsior Common European Ash 28. Cedrus atlantica 'Glauca' Blue Atlas Cedar 29. Quercus rubra Red Oak 30. Aesculus hippocastanum Horse Chestnut 31. Sophora microphylla Kowhai 32. Alectryon excelsus Titoki 33. Podocarpus totara Totara 34. Pittosporum tenuifolium Kohuhu 35. Prunus lusitanica Portugese Laurel 36. Acer griseum Paper-bark Maple 37. Acer palmatum Japanese Maple 38. Pseudopanax crassifolium Lancewood 39. Ulmus glabra 'Camperdownii: Camperdown elm 40. Cordyline australis Cabbage Tree 41. Myoporum laetum Ngaio 42. Schinus molle Peruvian Peppercorn Tree 43. Ulmus procera English Elm 44. Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 45. Melicytus ramiflorus Mahoe/Whiteywood 46. Acer pseudoplatanus Sycamore 47. Pittosporum ralphii Karo 48.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Competition Between Conifer and Angiosperm Trees Author(S): Timothy J
    Elegance versus Speed: Examining the Competition between Conifer and Angiosperm Trees Author(s): Timothy J. Brodribb, Jarmila Pittermann, and David A. Coomes Reviewed work(s): Source: International Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 173, No. 6 (July/August 2012), pp. 673- 694 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/666005 . Accessed: 09/07/2012 23:02 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of Plant Sciences. http://www.jstor.org Int. J. Plant Sci. 173(6):673–694. 2012. Ó 2012 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2012/17306-0010$15.00 DOI: 10.1086/666005 ELEGANCE VERSUS SPEED: EXAMINING THE COMPETITION BETWEEN CONIFER AND ANGIOSPERM TREES Timothy J. Brodribb,1,* Jarmila Pittermann,y and David A. Coomesz *School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; yDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, U.S.A.; and zForest Ecology and Conservation Group, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom Angiosperm radiation in the Cretaceous is thought to have profoundly diminished the success of the conifers, the other major woody plant group present at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIGENOUS SPECIES - TOTARA Indigenous Species Could Provide a Viable Alternative for Landowners and Forest Growers Where Radiata Pine Is Not the Species of Choice
    INDIGENOUS SPECIES - TOTARA Indigenous species could provide a viable alternative for landowners and forest growers where radiata pine is not the species of choice. Totara can be valuable as a timber, carbon sequestration and environmental resource. Future supply of specialty timber. Although the the developing timber resource current harvest of totara is low, significant areas of totara are regenerating on farmland throughout New Indigenous species such as totara Zealand. (Podocarpus totara), have been shown to be On hill slopes where there is a nearby seed source, more productive than expected. Many of the and where they are not heavily grazed or cleared desirable attributes of old-growth totara can regularly by landowners, totara develops into small be found in young trees comprised mainly of stands of saplings within 20 years. This developing sapwood, both in natural and planted stands. resource has the potential to be managed as a future long-term supply of specialty timber without the cost of establishment. Regenerating totara on farmlands has the potential to be managed as a valuable timber Most such stands range in age from 50-120 years, with resource. average diameters of 11-25 cm and have been shown to respond to both thinning and pruning. However, Scion is developing business cases for plantation and second-growth regenerated totara stands can produce breast height diameters of 60 cm indigenous species to help growers make within 75 years. Without side shelter, stem form is likely comparisons with other forest species and to to be poor, and a large proportion of totara will be multi- support their investment decisions.
    [Show full text]