source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.130257 | downloaded: 24.9.2021 ipsso rtaoerssatmsoddcinsfo h ER. the ER from selectively clients the pathway misfolded proteasome-resistant between autophagy of the crosstalk disposes and a to machinery procollagen Thus, control and degradation. quality CANX for both lysosome containing ER the of LC portion a protein delivers membrane-associated autophagosome the binds 2018 ª neat ihteE-hg eetrFAM receptor ER-phagy the and with procollagens misfolded interacts luminal as ER ER-phagy acts recognizes that CANX the co-receptor Mechanistically, procollagens. and endogenous of (CANX) control Calnexin ER- FAM the chaperone that receptor found We lectin cells. producing resident collagen in proteins ER and Keywords ER CRISPR- the interference, siRNA in performed Cas We procollagens unknown. still misfolded auto- is how lumen recognizes However, attain autophagy. selectively to by fails cleared phagy that is fraction structure in a native synthesized and the are (ER), Metazoa, reticulum in endoplasmic products the gene recognizes abundant that Procollagens, most process the mechanisms. control receptor-mediated quality through cytosolic substrates a is Autophagy Abstract Forrester Alison Calnexin-FAM a via quality control procollagen exerts ER-phagy selective A Article DOI Transport Categories Subject eploStaiano Leopoldo amn Settembre Carmine ai Iavazzo Maria 11 10 ai noitaD Matteis De Antonietta Maria 8 7 6 5 3 2 1 9 4 2018 eateto ilg,SisFdrlIsiueo ehooy uih Switzerland Zurich, Technology, of Institute Federal Swiss Biology, of Department xeietlIaigCne,SnRfal cetfcIsiue ia,Italy Milan, Switzerland Institute, Bellinzona, Scientific (USI), Raffaele italiana San Svizzera Center, della Imaging Università Experimental Biomedicine, in Research for Institute Sciences, Biomedical of Faculty eateto eia n rnltoa cec,Uiest fNaples of University Science, Translational and Medical of Department iiino eeisadCl ilg,SnRfal cetfcIsiue seaeSnRfal,Mln Italy Naples Milan, of Raffaele, University San Biotechnologies, Ospedale Medical Institute, and Scientific Medicine Raffaele Molecular San of Biology, Department Cell and Genetics of Division Frankfurt University Goethe II, Biochemistry of Institute uhanIsiuefrMlclrLf cecs oteUiest rnfr,Fakuta an Germany Main, am Frankfurt Frankfurt, University Goethe Sciences, Life Molecular for Institute Buchmann rdaeSho o ellradBoeia cecs nvriyo en en Switzerland Bern, Bern, of University Sciences, Biomedical and Cellular for School Graduate 9 colo ieSine,ÉoePltcnqeFdrl eLuan,Luan,Switzerland Lausanne, Lausanne, de Fédérale Polytechnique École Sciences, Life of School eehnIsiueo eeisadMdcn TGM,Pzul,Italy Pozzuoli, (TIGEM), Medicine and Genetics of Institute Telethon † *Crepnigato.Tl + Tel: author. ***Corresponding + Tel: author. **Corresponding + Tel: author. *Corresponding 10 hs uhr otiue qal oti work this to equally contributed authors These Accepted | rkoku-eitdgn eeino addt autophagy candidate of deletion gene knockout-mediated or . h uhr.Pbihdudrtetrso h CBY CC the of terms the under Published Authors. The 15252 uohg;Clei;clae;edpamcrtclm FAM reticulum; endoplasmic collagen; Calnexin; autophagy; /embj. 31 134 October 201899847 r eurdfratpaymdae quality autophagy-mediated for required are B uohg elDah ebae&Intracellular & Membrane Death; Cell & Autophagy 1 ail Intartaglia Daniela , 1 , † 1 2018 haaD Leonibus De Chiara , lraFregno Ilaria , Received | 1 96 315964 6301 69 49 , 19 8200319 91 41 11 ulse online Published | 90112 0601 1923 081 39 ,*** 17 May 1 / -al dikic@biochem E-mail: ; 352 , 8 vnDikic Ivan , 2018 -al [email protected] E-mail: ; -al [email protected] E-mail: ; 134 3 , 17 4 nraRaimondi Andrea , .I un FAM turn, In B. Revised | December 1 – 4 at Seczynska Marta , eia aut,Uiest optl rnfr mMi,Germany Main, am Frankfurt Hospital, University Faculty, Medical . 0 license 1 , † al Grumati Paolo , 10 2018 2 , October 9 ,* 2 “ .uni-frankfurt.de eeioII Federico 134 3 134 and B arzoMolinari Maurizio , B ” als Italy Naples, , 5 h MOJunl( Journal EMBO The 06 Grumati LC3- 2016; as by capture (i.e. (Khaminets for subdomains receptors AVs) ER ER-phagy specific decorate as that proteins identified binding been have CCPG1 proteins and RTN3 SEC62, FAM134B, mammalian the and Atg40 Atg39, in(rgo&Mlnr,21;Grumati 2018; Molinari, are degrada- & for ER (Fregno lysosomes tion the the of to transported portions and which AVs in within sequestered autophagy of via form selective autophagy a ER- to phagy, by targeted represented is be example notable can A processes. portions receptor-mediated their or organelles entire h ag oL3o AAA rtis hc eoaeautophago- decorate which of proteins, binding GABARAP (Stolz membranes or facilitate somal LC3 that to respectively) cargo GIM, the or (LIR motif GABARAP interaction or LC3 a harbour receptors Autophagy processes. mediated such (Levine conditions, cancer disease and neurodegeneration many ageing, of counter- as progression and and onset homeostasis the tissue both maintain acts to essential 2011). (Mizushima, is degraded Autophagy is cargo where lysosomes with eventu- fuse that ally AVs) vesicles, (autophagic vesicles double-membrane material cytoplasmic in of sequestration the to devoted homeostatic process a catabolic is autophagy) as to referred (hereafter Macroautophagy Introduction “ lsadoMarazza Alessandro , 134 eeioII Federico 2 ec a Anken van Eelco , usrtscnb eetvl eiee oAstruhreceptor- through AVs to delivered selectively be can Substrates 2 , † ls Fasana Elisa , ” als Italy Naples, , complex B tal et tal et 3 2019 07 Smith 2017; , , 10 ,** 05 Mochida 2015; , ) 38 tal et 3 7 h MOJournal EMBO The , :e † vnConte Ivan , aiiaPiemontese Marilina , 99847 04 Rogov 2014; , 3 & , 6 em Bruno Gemma , tal et 08.E-hg eitsthe mediates ER-phagy 2018). , tal et tal et 38 08.T ae h yeast the date, To 2018). , tal et 1 05 Fumagalli 2015; , :e , 99847 07.Poen and Proteins 2017). , tal et | 2019 2015). , 1 , 1 , 1 of tal et 16 , The EMBO Journal Procollagen ER quality control by CNX–FAM134B Alison Forrester et al
turnover of ER membranes and promotes recovery after ER stress, the autophagosome membrane marker LC3 fused with GFP (GFP- bacterial and viral infections (Khaminets et al, 2015; Chiramel et al, LC3) (Kabeya et al, 2000), and rat chondrosarcoma cells (RCS) 2016; Fumagalli et al, 2016; Grumati et al, 2017; Lennemann & Coyne, immunolabelled for LC3, we observed co-localization of LC3-positive 2017; Moretti et al, 2017; Smith et al, 2018). vesicles (hereafter referred as autophagic vesicles, AVs) with PC1 ER homeostasis relies on ER quality control mechanisms to (MEFs and Saos2) and PC2 (RCS) (Fig 1A–D). Similarly, we observed prevent the accumulation of inappropriately folded cargoes within the co-localization of PC1 spots with the GFP-tagged double-FYVE its lumen. Misfolded proteins are dislocated from the ER to the domain-containing protein 1 (DFCP1), which labels sites for cytosol to be degraded by the 26S proteasome, a process known as autophagosome biogenesis (omegasomes) (Fig EV1A and B). In vivo, ER-associated degradation (ERAD)(Preston & Brodsky, 2017). osteoblasts of the mandible in Medaka fish embryos (stage 40), However, not all misfolded ER proteins are eligible for ERAD and showed the presence of AVs containing PC2 molecules (Fig EV1C–E). thus must be cleared from the ER through other processes. Auto- When MEFs, Saos2 and RCS cells were treated with the lysoso- phagy-dependent and autophagy-independent lysosomal degrada- mal inhibitor bafilomycin A1 (BafA1), PC molecules accumulated in tion of proteins from the ER has also been reported (Ishida et al, the lumen of swollen endo/lysosomes (LAMP1-positive organelles, 2009; Hidvegi et al, 2010; Houck et al, 2014; Fregno et al, 2018). hereafter referred as lysosomes) (Fig 1E–G). These data were vali- However, the mechanism by which misfolded ER luminal proteins dated by PC1 immuno-electron microscopy (IEM) (Fig 1H). Western are recognized by the cytosolic autophagic machinery and delivered blot analysis confirmed the accumulation of intracellular PCs, as to the lysosomes remains to be understood. well as of the autophagy markers LC3-II and SQSTM1/p62, in cells Collagens are the most abundant proteins in animals, and type I treated with BafA1 compared to untreated cells (Fig EV2A). BafA1 and type II collagen (COL1 and COL2) are the major protein compo- washout induced a rapid clearance of PC1 and PC2 from lysosomes nents of bone and cartilage, respectively (Bateman et al, 2009). of MEFs and RCS, respectively, in line with the notion that PCs are They are synthesized as alpha I and alpha II chains and folded into degraded in this compartment (Fig EV2B and C). triple helices of procollagen (PC) in the ER. Properly folded PCs Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are genetic diseases charac- associate with the heat shock protein 47 (HSP47) chaperone and terized by a defective lysosomal degradative capacity due to muta- then leave the ER through sub-regions called ER exit sites (ERES), tions in genes encoding for lysosomal proteins. As a result, within COPII-coated carriers, and move along the secretory pathway lysosomal substrates progressively accumulate within the lumen of (Malhotra & Erlmann, 2015). Previous studies estimated that lysosomes causing lysosomal swelling and cell dysfunction. We approximately 20% of newly synthesized type I PC (PC1) is sought to determine whether PC molecules accumulate in the lyso- degraded by lysosomes as a consequence of inefficient PC1 folding somes of LSD osteoblasts. Saos2 osteoblasts in which the alpha-L- or secretion (Bienkowski et al, 1986; Ishida et al, 2009). In case of iduronidase gene was deleted using CRISPR-Cas9 technology mutations in PC or HSP47, the fraction of PC degraded increases (CRISPR-IDUA) represent a disease model of mucopolysaccharidosis significantly (Ishida et al, 2009). Similarly, a fraction of type II PC type I (MPS I), a lysosomal storage disorder with severe skeletal (PC2) produced by chondrocytes of the growth plates is degraded manifestations (Oestreich et al, 2015). Similar to cells treated with by autophagy, and inactivation of this catabolic pathway results in BafA1, CRISPR-IDUA showed swollen lysosomes, suggesting an PC2 accumulation in the ER and defective formation of the extracel- accumulation of undigested substrates in the lysosomal lumen lular matrix (Cinque et al, 2015; Bartolomeo et al, 2017; Settembre (Fig 1I). Most importantly, the level of PC1 in lysosomes, and in the et al, 2018). Overall these data clearly indicate that aberrant PC whole cell lysate, was higher in CRISPR-IDUA Saos2 compared to molecules represent ERAD-resistant substrates where autophagic control cells (Fig 1I and J). clearance emerges as a crucial and physiologically relevant event in To verify at which trafficking stage PC became an autophagy the maintenance of cellular and organ homeostasis. However, to substrate, we performed a temperature shift assay where PC accu- date, the mechanism by which ER-localized PCs are selectively mulates in the ER during incubation at 40°C, and is released from disposed of by autophagy is still unknown. the ER upon shift of the temperature to 32°C. U2OS cells expressing In this study, we sought to uncover the mechanisms that select non- GFP-LC3, mCherry-PC2 and ER marker RDEL-HALO, were imaged native PC in the ER lumen for lysosomal delivery and clearance. We upon shift to 32°C (time 0 s). We observed that PC2 spots formed at found that the misfolded PC molecules (e.g. HSP47 negative) are cleared the ER and progressively accumulated GFP-LC3 (Fig 2A and Movie from the ER through FAM134B-mediated ER-phagy. Notably, FAM134B EV1). Similarly in U2OS cells expressing phosphatidylinositol 3- binds PC molecules in the ER through the interaction with the trans- phosphate (PtdIns(3)P) -recognition domain construct GFP-2•FYVE, membrane ER chaperone Calnexin (CANX) that acts as a specific mCherry-PC2 and ER marker RDEL-HALO, the PC2 was visible at FAM134B ER-phagy co-receptor for misfolded PCs. The formation of this an area of GFP-2•FYVE-positive ER, and dissociated from the main complex allows the selective delivery of PC molecules to the lysosomes. tubular ER structure releasing a vesicle positive for ER, GFP-2•FYVE and PC2 (Fig 2B and Movie EV2). Co-localization between GFP-LC3, the ER chaperone CANX and PC1 was also observed by Airyscan Results super-resolution confocal microscopy (Fig 2C). Similarly, we observed co-localization of PC1 spots with GFP-DFCP1 and CANX in Autophagy promotes degradation of intracellular procollagens MEFs and Saos2 cells (Fig EV3A). We also performed correlative preventing their accumulation in the ER light electron microscopy (CLEM) and electron tomography of GFP- LC3 expressing Saos2 cells, showing that PC1 and CANX are found Using three different collagen producing cell lines, mouse embryonic together in a small vesicle contained within a larger LC3-positive fibroblasts (MEFs) and human osteoblasts (Saos2) stably expressing vesicle (Fig 2D and E). Taken together, these data suggest that PC
2 of 16 The EMBO Journal 38:e99847 | 2019 ª 2018 The Authors Alison Forrester et al Procollagen ER quality control by CNX–FAM134B The EMBO Journal
A B C D 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 MEF Saos2 RCS LC3 (%) TOTAL / 5 GFP-LC3 PC1 (568) Hoechst LC3 (488) PC2 (647) PC COLOC. WITH LC3 0
MEF RCS Saos2 E FHG
MEF + BafA1 Saos2 + BafA1 RCSRCS ++ BafA1BaBafA1fA1 + BafA1 Lamp1 (488) PC1 (568) Hoechst Lamp1 (488) PC2 (568) PC1 Immunogold Hoechst
J I
25 *** WT CRISPR IDUA
20 190 PC1
15 100 Lamp1 10 17 LC3 5 11 46 WT CRISPR IDUA β-actin 0
PC1 POSITIVE LYSOSOMES M (K) Lamp1 (488) PC1 (568) Hoechst / TOTAL LAMP1 PER CELL (%) r WT
CRISPR IDUA
Figure 1. PCs are autophagy substrates and accumulate in lysosomes. A, B Airyscan confocal analysis of PC1 (568, red) co-localization with GFP-LC3 (green) in (A) MEF (B) Saos2. Scale bars = 10 lm. The insets show higher magnification (A = x4.68;B=x6.76) and single colour channels of the boxed area. C Airyscan confocal analysis of PC2 (647, red) co-localization with LC3 (488, green) in RCS cells. Scale bars = 10 lm. The insets show higher magnification (x7.33) and single colour channels of the boxed area. D Quantification of GFP (A, B) or LC3 (C) vesicles positive for PC1 or PC2, expressed as % of total LC3 (mean SEM), n = 18 cells (MEFs and Saos2); n = 12 (RCS) from three independent experiments. E–G Scanning confocal microscopy analysis of MEFs, Saos2 and RCS cells treated with BafA1, immunolabelled for PC1 or PC2 and LAMP1. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst. (E, F) Scale bars = 10 lm, (G) Scale bars = 5 lm. The insets show higher magnification (E = x4.99;F = x6.49;G = x2.01) and single colour channels of the boxed area. H Transmission EM analysis in Saos2 cells, treated with BafA1, showing in detail a lysosome which contains immunolabelled PC1 (with nanogold particles), as indicated by arrows. I Scanning confocal microscopy analysis of Saos2 WT and CRISPR-Cas9 IDUA Saos2 at steady state, immunolabelled for PC1 and LAMP1. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst. Scale bar = 10 lm. The insets show higher magnification (left = x3.09; right = x3.12) and single colour channels of the boxed area. Bar graph shows quantification of lysosomes containing PC1 expressed as % of total LAMP1 per cell (mean SEM). n = 31 WT cells, n = 33 CRISPR cells counted; three independent experiments. Student’s unpaired, two-tailed t-test ***P < 0.0001. J WT and CRISPR-IDUA Saos2 lysed and analysed by Western blot. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Source data are available online for this figure.
molecules are sequestered within LC3-positive vesicles when they sequesters non-native PC1 molecules in the ER (Fig EV3B), in line are still within the ER. with previous results (Ishida et al, 2009; Cinque et al, 2015). To The collagen-specific chaperone HSP47 was excluded from the further corroborate this notion, we studied two missense mutations AVs containing PC1 in MEFs, strongly suggesting that autophagy in the COL2A1 protein (R789C and G1152D) that induce misfolding
ª 2018 The Authors The EMBO Journal 38:e99847 | 2019 3 of 16 The EMBO Journal Procollagen ER quality control by CNX–FAM134B Alison Forrester et al
A GFP-LC3 mCherry-PC2 RDEL-HALO 155s
0s 8s 34s 37s 40s 155s B GFP-2-FYVE mCherry-PC2 RDEL-HALO C GFP-LC3 CANX (647) PC1 (405) 0s
0s 6s D IF:GFP-LC3/PC1/CANX EM:PC1-Nanogold IF-EM Overlay
E
500nm 3D Electron TomographyTomographic CLEM Slice IF-ET Overlay 3D Rendering
Figure 2. Autophagy sequesters PC molecules in the ER. A, B U2OS expressing (A) GFP-LC3 or (B) GFP-2-FYVE (green), mCherry-PC2 (red) and RDEL-HALO (blue) were imaged live by spinning disc microscopy. Single and merge channels time-lapse stills at higher magnification (A = x3.93;B=x3.42) from the boxed region are shown on the right. Scale bar = 10 lm. C Airyscan analysis of Saos2 cells expressing GFP-LC3 (green) and immunolabelled for PC1 (405, blue) and CANX (647, red). The insets show higher magnification (x5.26) and single colour channels of the boxed area. Scale bar = 10 lm. D Correlative light electron microscopy (CLEM) and electron tomography of Saos2 cells transfected with GFP-LC3 (green) and labelled for PC1 (568, red and nanogold particles) and CANX (647, blue). Cells were first imaged by confocal microscopy (top left panel), and then, the same region was retraced in EM (upper middle panel) and overlay is shown (upper right panel). Arrow indicates a LC3-positive vesicle containing CANX and PC1 molecules. E Single tomography slice (left panel, taken from boxed are in D at a magnification of x2.84), overlay with immunofluorescence (IF) (central panel) and IF 3D rendering of AV (green) and the CANX positive vesicle containing gold particles of labelled collagen (blue and white, respectively) inside an AV (right panel).
4 of 16 The EMBO Journal 38:e99847 | 2019 ª 2018 The Authors Alison Forrester et al Procollagen ER quality control by CNX–FAM134B The EMBO Journal