A Walk in the Eastshore State Park Meetings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Codornices Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan
Codornices Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan Prepared for the Urban Creeks Council By Kier Associates Fisheries and Watershed Professionals 207 Second Street, Ste. B Sausalito, CA 94965 November, 2003 The Codornices Creek watershed assessment and salmonid restoration planning project, the results of which are reported here, was funded by the Watershed Program of the California Bay-Delta Authority, through Contract No. 4600001722 between the California Department of Water Resources and the Urban Creeks Council. The Urban Creeks Council is a non-profit organization working to preserve, protect, and restore urban streams and their riparian habitat. The Urban Creeks Council may be reached at 1250 Addison Street, Ste. 107, Berkeley, CA 94702 (510- 540-6669). Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................... ii Introduction Fish and stream habitat records................................................................................................. 1 Other Codornices Creek studies................................................................................................ 1 Methods: How Each Element of the Project Was Undertaken Fish population assessment methods ........................................................................................ 2 Salmonid habitat assessment methods..................................................................................... -
Major Streams and Watersheds of East Marin
Ch ile no t å V S 29 al å le y Rd I D St d Major Streams and WatershedsR of East Marin San Anto o ni i o n R o d t 9å3 S n an A A å nton io Rd n a S Ma rs ha d ll R P s e e ta y lum e a R R d t L P a a k m e lu vi ta lle Pe R d W i lso n H ill Rd SOULAJULE RESERVOIR L 4 a 2 k e v il North Novato le R d 9 48 7 6 3 ay w 0 gh 1 i H e at St r an Ma in S 3 D 7 N r ova U to n B i lv t d 7å3 e å å n d 77 L å S s d t a n v l o t e B m s STAFFORD LAKE d m H i o S o i g A w h th N d w e o e r East Marin Schools v a to a R n to y A d å Bå 55 1 v R lv t G e å d å ra 0 å Blackpoint e n å å å 63 å S t 59 a A 1 1, ADALINE E KENT MIDDLE SCHOOL 34, LYNWOOD ELEM. SCHOOL 67, RING MOUNTAIN DAY SCHOOL å v ve å r m A h D u t r l 7 D o a n å e L b t o 32 ong r å å e å s å Av a il e 2, ALLAIRE SCHOOL 35, MADRONE CONTINUATION HIGH SCHOOLP 68, ROSS ELEM. -
Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service -
Codornices Creek Fish Passage and Habitat Improvement Project
Codornices Creek Fish Passage and Habitat Improvement Project Conceptual Restoration Plan San Pablo Avenue to Monterey Avenue Codornices Creek Berkeley, California May 2005 Urban Creeks Council 1250 Addison Street, #107 Berkeley California 94702 FarWest Restoration Engineering 538 Santa Clara Ave Alameda, CA 94501 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope 1.2 About the Urban Creeks Council 1.3 Project Participants and Objectives 2.0 BACKGROUND AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Watershed and Land Use 2.2 Historic Conditions 2.3 Streamflow Records 2.4 Historic Flooding 2.5 Existing Biological Resources 2.6 Prior Stream Habitat Assessments 2.7 Prior Fish Barrier Assessments 3.0 SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS PROJECT 4.0 STREAMBANK STABILIZATION AND FISH BARRIER REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES 4.1 Existing Channel Conditions 4.2 Preliminary Design for Habitat Improvements 4.2.1 St. Mary’s College High School 4.2.1.1 Proposed Bank Stabilization 4.3 Preliminary Design for Fish Barrier Modifications 4.3.1 Culvert Modifications 4.3.1.1 Evaluation of Culvert Barrier Modifications under Flood Flow Conditions 4.3.1.2 Previous Hydraulic Analysis of Culverts 4.3.1.3 Results of the Hydraulic Modeling of Baffled Culverts 4.3.2 Albina Street Bridge 4.3.2.1 Proposed Barrier Modification 4.3.2.2 Results of Flood Modeling 4.3.3 Concrete Channel Section Upstream from Albina Street Bridge 4.3.3.1 Proposed Barrier Modification 4.3.3.2 Results of Hydraulic Modeling 5.0 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES 6.0 COMMUNITY OUTREACH 6.1 CCWRAP Working Group 6.2 Community Meetings 6.3 Homeowner Interaction 6.4 Media 7.0 NEXT STEPS 8.0 REFERENCES i LIST of FIGURES Figure 1: Codornices Creek Watershed Map Figure 2: Flood Indicator Debris Line along Cornell Avenue Figure 3: O. -
December 2012 Vol.13, No.12 HAPPY HOLIDAYS
Color Page “The Voice of the Waterfront” December 2012 Vol.13, No.12 HAPPY HOLIDAYS PIER 39 & Disneyland ® Resort Bringing in the Holidays with Style Adobe Erases the Waste Lighted Boat Parades Company Nabs Green Award A December Bay Tradition Complete Ferry Schedules for all SF Lines Color Page CRUISES Private Charters & Hop-on Bus Tours Available GOLDEN GATE BAY CRUISE® The Original for 70 Years! Sail under the Golden Gate Bridge and around Alcatraz, and discover San Francisco’s history in 12 languages. 8 -14 daily sailings starting at 10 AM. CALIFORNIA TWILIGHT CRUISE® Enjoy views of the spectacular city lights, live guitar entertainment and hearty appetizers from the buffet on this relaxed 2-hour cruise. 12 LANGUAGES Pier 43½ Fisherman’s Wharf redandwhite.com 415-673-2900 2 December 2012 www.baycrossings.com For Work. For Play. The Easy Way toCross the Bay. Vallejo CLIPPER CARD FRIENDS NOW ACCEPTED & FAMILY On Alameda, Oakland TRY IT DISCOUNT & Harbor Bay Routes FREE Angel Island TICKETS NEW SERVICE Pier 41 Vallejo-San Francisco Oakland Route TO SOUTH Details Online San Francisco SAN FRANCISCO Alameda AT&T Park From Alameda & Oakland Harbor Bay Follow. Connect. Share. Details Online South San Francisco For Ferry Route, Schedule, Ticket and Terminal Information www.SanFranciscoBayFerry.com (415) 705-8291 M-F, 8AM-5PM www.baycrossings.com December 2012 3 columns feature WHO’S AT THE HELM? 08 GREEN PAGES Capt. Dave Houghton 12 by Matt Larson Adobe Gets Top Award for Waste Reduction 17 by Bill Picture 10 SAILING ADVENTURES Having What It Takes guides by Captain Ray news WATERFRONT ACTIVITIES 18 Our recreational resource guide BAYKEEPER 14 WATERFRONT NEWS WETA FERRY SCHEDULES Water Pollution Quiz 06 20 More Cargo for the Port Be on time for last call by Deb Self of San Francisco AROUND THE BAY by Patrick Burnson 22 To see, be, do, know Tugboat Performs Rescue 07 ON OUR COVER November 2012 Volume 13, Number 11 of Man Stranded in Bay Bobby Winston, Proprietor A.C. -
Planning for Native Oyster Restoration in San Francisco Bay. Final Report to California Coastal Conservancy Agreement
Planning for Native Oyster Restoration in San Francisco Bay Final Report to California Coastal Conservancy Agreement # 05-134 Edwin Grosholza, Jim Mooreb, Chela Zabina, Sarikka Attoea and Rena Obernoltea aDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy University of California, Davis bCalifornia Department of Fish and Game Funding provided by the California Ocean Protection Council Introduction Historically, native Olympia oysters Ostreola conchaphila (=Ostrea lurida) (Turgeon et al. 1998) were an abundant and ecologically important part of the fauna in West Coast estuaries and an important fishery (Barnett 1963, Baker 1995). Unfortunately, the popularity of the fishery that began in the 1850s resulted in the complete collapse of native oyster populations along the west coast of the U.S. during the late 19th and early 20th centuries (Barnett 1963, Baker 1995). Not only was the fishery lost, but so were the key ecosystem services provided by native oysters. Studies of oysters in estuaries in the eastern U.S. have shown that native oyster reefs (Crassostrea virginica) act as a “foundation species” by creating a refuge from predators and physical stress as well as a food source resulting in increased local diversity of fishes and invertebrates (Zimmerman 1989, Lenihan 1999, Micheli and Peterson 1999, Lenihan et al. 2001). In the largely unstructured, soft-sediment habitats of West Coast estuaries, aggregations of native oysters were likely to have provided similar functions and have been shown to increase invertebrate species richness (Kimbro and Grosholz 2006). The introduction of exotic Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) from Asia in the early 20th century provided a successful replacement for the native oyster fishery. -
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Background ...............................................................................................1-1 2 Project Approach and Methodology.......................................................2-1 3 Key Issues and DC&E Qualities...............................................................3-1 4 Project Staff Qualifications......................................................................4-1 5 Recent Relevant Experience....................................................................5-1 6 Disclosure ..................................................................................................6-1 7 Fee Schedule .............................................................................................7-1 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS i DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT CITY OF ALBANY ALBANY WATERFRONT VISIONING PROJECT STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ii DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT BACKGROUND 1 Background neighbors and work towards consensus on a vision for the future. In addition to creating an The Albany waterfront is a place of paradox. environment of trust and openness, the process Although much of the land there today is must also encourage creativity and innovation artificial fill dumped and engineered over the from citizens, consultants, City staff and the past 60 years, Fleming Point is one of the last property owner. remaining natural features in this stretch of the bay shore. The views from the Albany shoreline are unparalleled, and yet the shoreline today is virtually deserted. At the edge of -
Table of Contents Meet-At-A-Glance
Santa Anita Park 2017 Spring Media Guide Table of Contents Meet-At-A-Glance . 2 The Gold Cup at Santa Anita . 28-29 Information Resources . 3 Honeymoon Stakes . 30-31 Santa Anita Spring Attendance and Handle . 4 Kona Gold Stakes . 31 Santa Anita Spring Opening Day Statistics . 4 Landaluce Stakes . 32-33 Michael Wrona Biography . 4 Lazaro Barrera Stakes . 33 Santa Anita Spring Meet Attendance . 5 Lennyfrommalibu Stakes . 33 Santa Anita Spring 2016 Meet Handle, Payoffs & Top Five Days . 5 Los Angeles Stakes . 34-35 Santa Anita Spring Meet Annual Media Poll . 6 Melair Stakes . 36 Santa Anita Track Records . 7 Monrovia Stakes . 36 Leaders at Previous Santa Anita Spring Meets . 8 Precisionist Stakes . 37-38 Santa Anita 2016 Spring Meet Standings . 9 San Carlos Stakes . 38-39 Roster of Santa Anita Jockeys . 10 San Juan Capistrano Stakes . 40-41 Roster of Santa Anita Trainers . 11 Santa Anita Juvenile . 42-43 2016 Santa Anita Spring Meet Stakes Winners . 12 Santa Barbara Stakes . 44-45 2016 Santa Anita Spring Meet Longest Priced Stakes Winners . 12 Senorita Stakes . 46 Stakes Histories . 13 Shoemaker Mile . 47-48 Adoration Stakes . 14-15 Snow Chief Stakes . 49 Affirmed Stakes . 15 Summertime Oaks . 50-51 American Stakes . 16-17 Thor's Echo Stakes . 51 Beholder Mile . 18-19 Thunder Road Stakes . 51 Californian Stakes . 20-21 Wilshire Stakes . 52 Charles Whittingham Stakes . 22 Satellite Wagering Directory . 53 Crystal Water Stakes . 23 Los Angeles Turf Inc . Club Officers/Administration . 54-55 Daytona Stakes . 23 Visitors Guide/Map of Los Angeles Freeways . 56 Desert Stormer Stakes . 24 Local Hotels and Restaurants . -
Pt. Isabel-Stege Area
Tales of the Bay Shore -- Pt. Isabel-Stege area Geology: The “bones” of the shoreline from Albany to Richmond are a sliver of ancient, alien sea floor, caught on the edge of North America as it overrode the Pacific. Fleming Point (site of today’s racetrack), Albany Hill, Pt. Isabel, Brooks Island, scattered hillocks inland, the hills at Pt Richmond, and the hills across the San Pablo Strait (spanned by the Richmond Bridge) all are part of this Novato Terrane. Erosion and uplift eventually left their hard rock as hilltops in a valley. Still later – only about 5000 years ago -- rising seas from the melting glaciers of our last Ice Age flooded the valley, forming today’s San Francisco Bay. The “alien” hilltops became islands, peninsulas linked to shore by marsh, or isolated dome-like “turtlebacks.” Left: Portion of 1911 map of SF Bay showing many Native American sites near Pt. Isabel and Stege. Right: 1853 U.S. Coastal Survey map showing N. end of Albany Hill, Cerrito Creek, Pt. Isabel, and marshes/ to North. Native Americans: Native Americans would have watched the slow rise of today’s Bay. When Europeans reached North America, the East Bay was the home of Huchiun Ohlone peoples. Living in groups generally of fewer than 100 people, they moved seasonally amid rich and varied resources, gathering, hunting, fishing, and encouraging useful plants with pruning and burning. They made reed boats, baskets, nets, traps, mortars, and a wide variety of implements and decorations. Along the shellfish-rich shoreline they gradually built up substantial hills of debris – shell mounds -- that kept them above floods and served as multipurpose homesites, burial sites, refuse dumps, and more. -
Meeting #4 June 19, 2018 San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) 4911 Central Ave, Richmond, CA 94804
Adapting to Rising Tides Bay Area Regional Working Group: Meeting #4 June 19, 2018 San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) 4911 Central Ave, Richmond, CA 94804 **PowerPoint available online at www.adaptingtorisingtides.org/projects/art-bay-area Welcome and Introduction: Carey Batha • ART Bay Area project recap, project progress to-date, rationale for organizing vulnerability assessments by Operational Landscape Units (OLUs) o Question: What are the gray areas on the OLU map? Carey: These are the OLUs we are not assessing. We are assessing ART Bay Area assets within 13 OLUs (out of 30). You can find a map of these 13 OLUs here and on the final page of these notes. However, we are also addressing certain long linear assets, such as transportation and the bay trail, throughout the region. Presentation on SFEI Operational Landscape Units (OLUs): Julie Beagle • Introduction to OLU development, scientific grounding, and intended uses o Question: What’s a polder? § Answer (Jeremy Lowe, SFEI): A polder is an area of pressurized land below normal tidal level. For example, an island is above tide line. A polder is land that sits lower than the tide line and therefore very vulnerable to flooding. o Question (from online group): Do OLU boundaries consider rivers or drainage divides? § Answer (SFEI): Yes, OLUs are the expression of watersheds at the Baylands. One of the principles for the delineation was to avoid splitting watersheds or tidal sheds. Each OLU represents the receiving end of one or more watersheds. While the OLU itself must be a manageable size (i.e. the Alameda Creek OLU can’t go all the way to Livermore), the analyses included the watershed inputs of water and sediment. -
Flood Control & Water Conservation District
Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone 3 Advisory Board Meeting May 28, 2009 6:30 – 8:30 pm Mill Valley City Hall Council’s Chambers Meeting Agenda Approval of Meeting Minutes: November 8, 2007 Introduction of New Advisory Board Member Gary Lion Review of Brown Act and Form 700 Requirements Open Time for Items Not on the Agenda Project Status Reports A) Bothin Marsh – Coyote Creek Restoration and Flood Control Project B) Seminary Dr. Pump Station C) SCADA System D) Crest Marin Creek Flood Study E) Richardson Bay Tidal Flood Study F) Zone 3 Stormwater Master Plan Update G) Arroyo Corte Madera del Presidio Flood Study Advance Flood Warning Notification - ACMdP Sea-level Rise Discussion Maintenance Activities Update Zone 3 Budget FY 2008-2009 Schedule Next Meeting Brown Act & Form 700 Requirements Brown Act – What is it? Authored by Ralph M. Brown, an Assemblyman from Turlock, and enacted in 1953 by the California State Legislature in an effort to safeguard the public's right to access and participate in government meetings within the State. o Specifies advance notice for open public meetings. o Dictates to District staff specific administrative requirements for meetings. o Sets provisions on how board members can communicate information with one another. o Board members are asked to view County of Marin – Boards and Commissions Training Video highlighting important points of the Brown Act. Acknowledgement form must also be signed and returned. Brown Act & Form 700 Requirements Brown Act & Form 700 Requirements “The Mission of the FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION is to promote the integrity of representative state and local government in California through fair, impartial interpretation and enforcement of political campaign, lobbying, and conflict of interest laws.” www.fppc.ca.gov o Forms are to be filled out each year and submitted to the Clerk of the Marin County Board of Supervisors. -
Part 4 (PDF, 793K)
Project Description 4. PROJECT PHASING Currently, funding from an Urban Parks Act Grant in the amount of $3,000,000 has been secured for the project. The East Bay Regional Parks District, in cooperation with the parties to the JPA, has also applied for a California Youth Soccer grant, a Healthy Communities Grant and a Land and Water Conservation Grant, all of which are pending, but have not been awarded. Therefore, since not all of the capital funds needed for the full project are currently available, the project has been designed so that it can be built in two phases. Phase I would involve the construction of the two soccer fields and parking lot adjacent to Gilman Street as well as the installation of the basic drainage and utility systems needed for the full project. See Figure 9. Phase II would involve the construction of the grass fields, the irrigation systems, the remaining parking lot, the tot‐lot, the field house and the rest of the lighting systems. The Phasing Plan has been designed so that the soccer fields could be placed in use after completion, whether or not construction funds are available for the Phase II facilities. As noted above, the grading work would be phased, beginning with the base for the soccer fields, drainage spine and Gilman Street parking area. Final grading for the remainder of the project could be postponed for months or years, depending on the availability of funds for development of Phase II. As noted, the grading plan anticipates that as much as 14,000 cubic yards of soil will have to be stockpiled on site between and second phases of construction.