DOCSLIB.ORG

Humor and Ethnography in Herodotus' Histories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HUMOR AND ETHNOGRAPHY IN HERODOTUS’ HISTORIES Mark Christopher Mash A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics. Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Emily Baragwanath, Advisor Peter M. Smith, Reader Owen E. Goslin, Reader Cecil W. Wooten, Reader Fred S. Naiden, Reader ©2010 Mark Christopher Mash ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT MARK CHRISTOPHER MASH: Humor and Ethnography in Herodotus’ Histories (Under the direction of Emily Baragwanath) This dissertation examines the role of humor in Herodotus’ Histories. I argue that Herodotus’ humor is best understood in the context of his ethnography, and base my analyses on the thoughts of ancient and modern writers on humor. In particular, I incorporate anthropological perspectives on humor, and most notably ethnic humor. In chapter one, I establish the groundwork for later discussions by situating my work in the context of previous ancient and modern analyses of humor. In chapter two, I examine derision and witty retorts, starting first with Herodotus’ own ridicule of mapmakers in 4.36.2. In chapter three, I discuss the role of humorous deception in the Histories. In this interplay of humor and deception, I examine three main types: tricks that are reveled in by the instigator, tricks that are uncovered, and tricks that turn deadly. In chapter four, I take up the relationship between didacticism and humor, and show how it appears as an oblique tool by which wise advisors are able to challenge the rigidity of their recipient’s thinking. What is more, didactic humor sometimes appears by negative example, as when Cambyses laughs at Egyptian religious nomoi (3.29.1-2) or when Xerxes laughs at Spartan nomoi (7.101-105). Finally, in chapter five, I discuss memorializing humor, which I find in particular relation to monuments, battles and political disputes. iii In all, I argue that by situating humor in the context of ethnography and by recognizing that it usually refers to different people’s nomoi, we are able to understand better how Herodotus uses humor as part of his narrative technique. Moreover, I find that this same humor often reveals the influence of the current historical and cultural situation in which Herodotus was writing. iv For Carrie v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Humor is a difficult topic, and I have completed this project only through the help and faith of many different individuals. I would like to thank especially my advisor, Emily Baragwanath, whose brilliance, kindness, and understanding of Herodotus continue to astound me. Thanks also to my committee members, Cecil Wooten, Peter Smith, Owen Goslin and Fred Naiden, all of whom have helped me along the way, challenged my assertions, and corrected my mistakes. Any errors that remain are solely my own. The late Gareth Morgan introduced me to Herodotus and much like Herodotus, combined playfulness with seriousness in his teaching. I think he was one of the best readers of Herodotus’ humor I have ever met. My Latin teacher, Reid Wightman, introduced me to the classical world, recognized my potential for future study, and inspired my efforts. The wonderful faculty of the UT Austin Classics Department prepared me well for graduate study and enabled me to reach my fullest potential as an undergraduate. My life over the last decade has been tied to the UNC Chapel Hill Classics Department and its outstanding faculty who challenged me, helped me to grow intellectually and personally, and graciously supported me to the completion of my studies. My family has carried me when I needed their help the most. My parents’ love and support in my every endeavor have given me strength, my older brother John always believed in and encouraged me, and my grandparents, John and Mary Flynn, vi have celebrated my successes and have been a formative part of my education. My twin sons, Ethan and Ryan, have shown me the joy of life and helped me to understand what is truly important. And yes, boys, I am now “Dr. Daddy.” Most of all, my dear wife Carrie has blessed me and made my life most fortunate indeed. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER ONE: ANCIENT AND MODERN ANALYSES OF HUMOR ......................................... 16 I. Ancient Analyses of Humor .............................................................................................. 16 II. Modern Analyses of Humor ............................................................................................ 21 A. The Psychological Perspective ................................................................................. 21 B. The Anthropological Perspective ............................................................................ 24 i. Terminology of Humor, Laughter, and Smiling ............................................... 25 ii. Humor and Language .......................................................................................... 28 III. Forms and Definitions of Ethnic Humor ...................................................................... 33 A. Definitions of Ethnic Humor .................................................................................... 34 B. Forms of Ethnic Humor ............................................................................................. 37 C. Techniques Used in Ethnic Humor .......................................................................... 39 D. Theoretical Importance of Ethnic Humor .............................................................. 40 E. Contextual Setting of Ethnic Humor ....................................................................... 42 IV. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 44 CHAPTER TWO: DERISION AND WITTY RETORTS .................................................................. 46 I. Persians/Greeks ................................................................................................................. 49 Cyrus to Spartiates about the Greeks (1.153) ............................................................. 49 II. The Spartans ..................................................................................................................... 52 A. Demaratus to Leotychidas’ messenger (6.67.1-3) .................................................. 54 viii B. Cleomenes to Crius (6.50) .......................................................................................... 58 C. Spartans and Samians (3.46) ..................................................................................... 62 III. The Athenians .................................................................................................................. 63 A. Themistocles to Timodemus (8.125.1-8.126.1) ....................................................... 65 B. Andrians to Themistocles (8.111.2-3) ...................................................................... 68 IV. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 71 CHAPTER THREE: HUMOROUS DECEPTION ............................................................................. 73 I. Reveling in the Trick ......................................................................................................... 85 A. Amasis, the footbath and the bow (2.172-173) ...................................................... 86 B. Democedes and Atossa (3.129-138) .......................................................................... 94 II. Tricks Uncovered ...........................................................................................................102 The Fish Eaters and the Ethiopian king (3.17-25) ....................................................102 III. Deadly Tricks .................................................................................................................115 Alexander and the Persian Ambassadors (5.18-22) .................................................115 IV. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................120 CHAPTER FOUR: DIDACTIC HUMOR .......................................................................................122 I. Didactic Humor in the Histories ......................................................................................125 A. The Lydians ...............................................................................................................126 i. Bias/Pittacus to Croesus (1.27.1-5) ...................................................................126 ii. Sandanis to Croesus (1.71.2-4) .........................................................................129 iii. Solon and Croesus (1.30-33) ............................................................................133 iv. Cyrus to Croesus (1.88-89) ...............................................................................143 ix B. The Persians ..............................................................................................................147 i. Cambyses to the Egyptian Priests (3.29.1-2) ...................................................147 ii. Xerxes to Demaratus (7.101-105) ....................................................................151 C. The Spartans .............................................................................................................154
Recommended publications
  • Racism As Observed by White Youth? Do White Youth Believe the Term Newfie Is an Ethnic Slur? What Are White Youths’ Views of Canada’S Response to the Syrian Crisis?

    Racism As Observed by White Youth? Do White Youth Believe the Term Newfie Is an Ethnic Slur? What Are White Youths’ Views of Canada’S Response to the Syrian Crisis?

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Memorial University Research Repository THE MANIFESTATIONS OF PREJUDICE IN EVERYDAY LIFE: AN EXAMINATION OF RACIAL MICROAGGRESSIONS, ETHNOPHAULISMS, AND INTEGRATED THREATS AS OBSERVED BY WHITE POST-SECONDARY YOUTH IN ST. JOHN’S, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR JAMES BAKER MCMASTER UNIVERSITY MAY 2017 2015-16 APPLIED RESEARCH FUND The Manifestations of Prejudice in Everyday Life: An Examination of Racial Microaggressions, Ethnophaulisms, and Integrated Threats as Observed by White Post-Secondary Youth in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador James Baker Banting Postdoctoral Fellow McMaster University Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Leslie Harris Centre of Regional Policy and Development, Memorial University, for providing financial support (through its Applied Research Fund) to conduct this research. I would also like to express sincere gratitude to those individuals who chose to participate in the interviews as well as my research assistant, Crystal Cline, who did a fantastic job in providing research support for this project. I also owe a sincere debt of gratitude to Dr. Amanda Bittner, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, who acted as a the grant holder so that this research could be undertaken. i Executive Summary With the arrival of some 250 Syrian refugees to Newfoundland and Labrador in 2015, there has been much news coverage of the crisis both at the provincial and national level. Unfortunately, over the past few months, reader comments on on-line news stories from local provincial media (e.g., CBC, VOCM, The Telegram) have expressed a very negative and often prejudiced view on whether Newfoundland and Labrador should accept more refugees.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    • ,.....-,-, ..........-- .... r(, n f / 1i' \) I '1 Cl -~-;:, .,-" ( 11 ,,/ 1C ( je: r.,'T J ! 1 ')(1' 1;) r I' , /. ,,' t ,r (' ~" , TI )' T Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte, Papyrologie und Epigraphik TYCHE Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte, Papyrologie und Epigraphik Band 19 2004 HOL % HAU 5 E N Herausgegeben von: Gerhard Dobesch, Bemhard Palme, Peter Siewert und Ekkehard Weber Gemeinsam mit: Wolfgang Hameter und Hans Taeuber Unter Beteiligung von: Reinhold Bichler, Herbert Graßl, Sigrid Jalkotzy und Ingomar Weiler Redaktion: Franziska Beutler, Sandra Hodecek, Georg Rehrenböck und Patrick Sänger Zuschriften und Manuskripte erbeten an: Redaktion TYCHE, c/o Institut für Alte Geschichte und Altertumskunde, Papyrologie und Epigraphik, Universität Wien, Dr. Karl Lueger-Ring 1, A-lOlO Wien. Beiträge in deutscher, englischer, französischer, italienischer und lateinischer Sprache werden angenommen. Bei der Redaktion einlangende wissenschaftliche Werke werden angezeigt. Auslieferung: Holzhausen Verlag GmbH, Holzhausenplatz ], A-] 140 Wien maggoschitz@holzhausen .at Gedruckt auf holz- und säurefreiem Papier. Umschlag: IG U2 2127 (Ausschnitt) mit freundlicher Genehmigung des Epigraphischen Museums in Athen, Inv.-Nr. 8490, und P.Vindob.Barbara 8. © 2005 by Holzhausen Verlag GmbH, Wien Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Intemet über http://clnb.dclb.de abrufbar Eigentümer und Verleger: Holzhausen Verlag GmbH, Holzhausenplatz ], A-1140 Wien Herausgeber: Gerhard Dobesch, Bernhard Palme, Peter Siewert und Ekkehard Weber, c/o Institut für Alte Geschichte und Altertumskunde, Papyrologie und Epigraphik, Universität Wien, Dr. Kar! Lueger-Ring 1, A-lOIO Wien. e-mail: [email protected]@univie.ac.at Hersteller: Holzhausen Druck & Medien GmbH, Holzhausenplatz 1, A-1140 Wien Verlagsort: Wien.
  • Dewald 1987. Carolyn Dewald, “Narrative Surface and Authorial

    Dewald 1987. Carolyn Dewald, “Narrative Surface and Authorial

    DEWALD, CAROLYN, Narrative Surface and Authorial Voice in Herodotus' "Histories" , Arethusa, 20:1/2 (1987:Spring/Fall) p.147 NARRATIVE SURFACE AND AUTHORIAL VOICE IN HERODOTUS' HISTORIES CAROLYN DEWALD It is a topos nowadays that an author does not just construct his text but also encodes into it a narrative contract: he writes into the text the rules by which his audience is to read it, how we are to under­ stand his performance as author and our own responsibilities and legitimate pleasures as readers. 1 Judged by the standards of later historical prose, the narrative contract that Herodotus establishes be­ tween himself, the author, and ourselves, his readers, is a peculiar one. Its rules are very odd indeed. Here I would like to explore two aspects of those rules: the construction of the narrative surface and of the authorial "I" within it. Both these aspects of Herodotus' rhetoric have generally been evaluated against the standard practices of history writing. But if we look at Herodotus' narrative surface and authorial voice on their own terms, the contract they suggest is not (at least in some essentials) a historical one. The Herodotus I would like to pro­ pose here is a heroic warrior. Like Menelaus on the sands of Egypt, he struggles with a fearsome beast - and wins. The antagonist that He­ rodotus struggles with is, like many mythic beasts, a polymorphously fearsome oddity; it consists of the logos, or collection of logoi, that comprise the narrative of the Histories. What Herodotus, like Mene­ laus, wants from his contest is accurate information.
  • Hawai'i Ethnic Humor, Local Identity and the Myth of Multiculturalism

    Hawai'i Ethnic Humor, Local Identity and the Myth of Multiculturalism

    Pragmatics 14:2/3.291-316 (2004) International Pragmatics Association “WE CAN LAUGH AT OURSELVES”: HAWAI‘I ETHNIC HUMOR, LOCAL IDENTITY AND THE MYTH OF MULTICULTURALISM1 Roderick N. Labrador Abstract Hawai‘i’s multiculturalism and perceived harmonious race and ethnic relations are widely celebrated in popular and academic discourse. The image of Hawai‘i as a “racial paradise,” a rainbow of peacefully co- existing groups, partially stems from the fact that among the various racial and ethnic groups there is no numerical majority and from the common belief in equality of opportunity and status. Hawai‘i ethnic humor is part and parcel of the maintenance and continued reinforcement of the notion of Hawai‘i as “racial paradise” with underlying racializing and stigmatizing discourses that disguise severe social inequalities and elide differential access to wealth and power. In this paper, I examine the intersection of language, humor, and representation by analyzing the linguistic practices in the comedy performances of Frank DeLima, a pioneer in Hawai‘i ethnic humor, and excerpts from Buckaloose: Shmall Keed Time (Small Kid Time), a comedy CD by Da Braddahs, a relatively new but tremendously popular comedy duo in Hawai‘i. Central to these comedy performances is the use of a language variety that I call Mock Filipino, a strategy often employed by Local comedians to differentiate the speakers of Philippine languages from speakers of Hawai‘i Creole English (or Pidgin). A key component to understanding the use of Mock Filipino is the idea of “Local” as a cultural and linguistic identity category and its concomitant multiculturalist discourse.
  • Extending Ethnic Humour Theory: Genuine Vs. Functional Ethnic Jokе Scripts

    Extending Ethnic Humour Theory: Genuine Vs. Functional Ethnic Jokе Scripts

    http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2018.6.2.takovski European Journal of Humour Research 6 (2) 60–80 www.europeanjournalofhumour.org Extending ethnic humour theory: Genuine vs. functional ethnic jokе scripts Aleksandar Takovski South East European University [email protected] Abstract Most ethnic humour that has been studied so far consists of jokes which use ethnically non- specific qualities such as stupidity or canniness in order to ridicule an ethnic group and thus to preserve and perpetuate ethnically based social hierarchies in western industrial societies. In light of this dominant logic in ethnic humour theory, the objective of this study is to problematize the relation of such non-ethnic qualities and the notion of ethnic identity, as well as their relation to a specific type of society, in an attempt to convincingly argue in favour of the need to differentiate between ‘ethnically-empty’ functional joke scripts and genuine ethnic joke scripts that are related to the ethnic identity of the target. In so doing, I extend ethnic humour theory by introducing and testing the notion of genuine ethnic joke scripts in order to motivate future research that will tackle other potential ethnic humour idiosyncrasies. Toward this end, I have collected and analysed joke material (N=369) coming from Macedonia, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Albania, societies with histories and relations very different that those in the western industrial societies. Additionally, the study incorporates two questionnaires with members of the two largest ethnicities in the Republic of Macedonia, Macedonians and Albanians, to ascertain the relation between the genuine ethnic humour and ethnic identity.
  • Campus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision Legal Theory

    Campus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision Legal Theory

    Alabama Law Scholarly Commons Articles Faculty Scholarship 1990 Campus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision Legal Theory Richard Delgado University of Alabama - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles Recommended Citation Richard Delgado, Campus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision Legal Theory, 85 Nw. U. L. Rev. 343 (1990). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles/383 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 1991 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. Northwestern University Law Review Vol. 85, No. 2 LEGAL THEORY CAMPUS ANTIRACISM RULES: CONSTITUTIONAL NARRATIVES IN COLLISION Richard Delgado* INTRODUCTION Over the past few years, nearly two hundred university and college campuses have experienced racial unrest serious or graphic enough to be reported in the press.1 Most observers believe the increase in racial ten- sion on the nation's campuses is real, and not just the product of better 2 reporting or record keeping. * Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado School of Law. J.D. 1974, U-C Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall). I delivered portions of this paper in talks at Harvard University and the University of Wisconsin in winter 1989-90. I am grateful to Kent Greenawalt, Michael Olivas, and Pierre Schlag for comments and suggestions. Anne Najem, Michael Kramer, Joan Leon, Marisa Walsh, and Bruce Bode, members of my fall 1989 first amendment seminar at University of Wisconsin, drafted major sections of this Article, and Lora Intrator and Robin Barnes performed heroically in editing and criticizing a sprawling manuscript.
  • Thesociologyofhumor Giselinde Kuipers

    Thesociologyofhumor Giselinde Kuipers

    The sociology of humor Giselinde Kuipers 1. Introduction Humor is a quintessentially social phenomenon. Jokes and other humorous utterances are a form of communication that is usually shared in social in- teraction. !ese humorous utterances are socially and culturally shaped, and o"en quite particular to a specific time and place. And the topics and themes people joke about are generally central to the social, cultural and moral order of a society or a social group. Despite the social character of humor, sociology, the discipline that stud- ies society and social relations, has not concerned itself much with humor. When sociology emerged in the nineteenth century, it focused mainly on the great structural transformations of the modern times: modernization, indus- trialization, urbanization, secularization, etc. It was not very interested in the “unserious” business of everyday life: interactions, emotions, play, leisure, private life, and other things not directly related to great developments on the macro-level of society – such as humor. In the course of the twentieth cen- tury, sociology became more diverse and increasingly concerned with the micro-reality of everyday life, but it still remained overwhelmingly devoted to the study of social problems, great transformations, and other serious mat- ters. As a result, humor came into focus mainly when it seemed problematic in itself, or was concerned with important social issues: race and ethnicity, political conflict, social resistance, gender inequalities. Meanwhile, questions about the social nature of humor were addressed by many other disciplines. Many of the classical humor theoreticians (Mor- reall 1983) touch on social aspects of humor.
  • The Joke Critical Race Theory: De Gustibus Disputandum Est?

    The Joke Critical Race Theory: De Gustibus Disputandum Est?

    Touro Law Review Volume 15 Number 1 Article 4 1998 The Joke Critical Race Theory: De Gustibus Disputandum Est? Dan Subotnik [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Civil Law Commons Recommended Citation Subotnik, Dan (1998) "The Joke Critical Race Theory: De Gustibus Disputandum Est?," Touro Law Review: Vol. 15 : No. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol15/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TIHE JOKE IN CRITICALSubotnik: RACE Joke THEORY: DE GUSTIBUS DISPUTANDUM EST?. Dan Subotnik* If ive laugh at each other we won't kill each other. Ralph Ellison' Deep down in the jungle so they say There's a signifying monkey down the way There hadn't been no disturbin' in the jungle for quite a bit, For up jumped the monkey in the tree one day and laughed, "Iguess I'll start some shit." Old African American toasr The central tenet of critical race theory - that American institutions and cultural practices not only reflect, but also maintain and create, power differentials between white men on the one hand and the powerless on the other 3 - offers unexpected benefits. Here's one. Since ethnicity and gender issues lurk * Dan Subomik is a professor of law at Touro Law Center. The author wishes to specially thank Al Kleinhaus, Ken Rosenblum, Jerry Giannattasio, Rena Seplowitz, Hon.
  • OH MY GOD, THAT NIGGER SAID GUN!”: Use of Ethnic Humor in Modern Stand-Up Comedy

    OH MY GOD, THAT NIGGER SAID GUN!”: Use of Ethnic Humor in Modern Stand-Up Comedy

    ”OH MY GOD, THAT NIGGER SAID GUN!”: Use of ethnic humor in modern stand-up comedy Master’s thesis Ville Jakoaho and Sami Marjamäki University of Jyväskylä Department of Languages English February 2012 JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO Tiedekunta – Faculty Laitos – Department Humanistinen tiedekunta Kielten laitos Tekijä – Author Ville Jakoaho ja Sami Marjamäki Työn nimi – Title “OH MY GOD, THAT NIGGER SAID GUN!”: Use of ethnic humor in modern stand-up comedy Oppiaine – Subject Työn laji – Level englanti Pro gradu -tutkielma Aika – Month and year Sivumäärä – Number of pages helmikuu 2012 117 sivua Tiivistelmä – Abstract Tutkielman tavoitteena oli selvittää, miten etninen huumori ilmenee modernissa stand-up komediassa. Tarkemmin sanottuna tutkielman kiinnostuksen kohde oli tutkia mihin tai keneen etninen huumori kohdistuu, ja mitä eri funktioita sillä saattaa olla. Tutkielmassa analysoitiin seitsemää eri stand-up esitystä viideltä eri amerikkalaiselta koomikolta, joista kaikki kuuluvat etnisiin vähemmistöryhmiin. Tutkielmassa käytetyt esitykset ovat live-esityksiä, jotka ovat julkaistu DVD formaattina. Tutkielma pohjautuu kriittiseen diskurssintutkimukseen ja keskeisenä metodina käytettiin Norman Fairclough:n kolmiulotteista diskurssimallia. Kriittisen diskurssintutkimuksen avulla pyrimme selvittämään sekä kielenkäytön tehtäviä että niiden vaikutuksia vitseissä, ja mitä mahdollisia implikaatioita koomikoiden vitseissä käyttämillä metodeilla on joko etnisten stereotypioiden vahvistamiseen tai heikentämiseen. Tutkielmassa havaittiin, että koomikoiden
  • Racial Jokes, Social Context, and the Reasonable Person in Hostile Work Environment Analysis

    Racial Jokes, Social Context, and the Reasonable Person in Hostile Work Environment Analysis

    076605.DOC 11/24/03 1:11 PM THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS: RACIAL JOKES, SOCIAL CONTEXT, AND THE REASONABLE PERSON IN HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS MELISSA K. HUGHES* Humor is laughing at what you haven’t got when you ought to have it. Humor is what you wish in your secret heart were not funny, but it is, and you must laugh. Humor is your unconscious therapy. –Langston Hughes1 I. INTRODUCTION Communicating ethnic animosity through humor has long been an American tradition. As early as the seventeenth century, Americans have utilized racial jokes2 to ridicule the culture, dialect, dress, and traditions of each new wave of immigrants.3 Images of “little black Sambo,” “the drunken Irishman,” and “the stupid Pole” have helped to define which ethnic groups are accepted and which remain on the fringe of society.4 Although racial jokes convey a wide variety of messages ranging from * Class of 2003, University of Southern California Law School; B.A. 2000, University of California, San Diego. I would like to thank my family for their confidence in me, Professor Noel Ragsdale for pointing me toward a topic, and Amber Mia Grayhorse for her enduring patience and insightful advice. I would also like to thank Professor Mary Dudziak for assisting in the drafting of this Note and for setting a high standard. 1. MEL WATKINS, ON THE REAL SIDE: A HISTORY OF AFRICAN AMERICAN COMEDY 16 (Lawrence Hill Books 1999) (1994). 2. In this Note, I use the terms “racial jokes” and “ethnic jokes” interchangeably. 3. See JOSEPH BOSKIN, HUMOR AND SOCIAL CHANGE IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY AMERICA 28 (1979) [hereinafter HUMOR AND SOCIAL CHANGE].
  • Hyperboreus Studia Classica

    Hyperboreus Studia Classica

    HYPERBOREUS STUDIA CLASSICA nausˆ d' oÜte pezÕj „èn ken eÛroij ™j `Uperboršwn ¢gîna qaumast¦n ÐdÒn (Pind. Pyth. 10. 29–30) EDITORES NINA ALMAZOVA SOFIA EGOROVA DENIS KEYER NATALIA PAVLICHENKO ALEXANDER VERLINSKY PETROPOLI Vol. 21 2015 Fasc. 1 BIBLIOTHECA CLASSICA PETROPOLITANA VERLAG C. H. BECK MÜNCHEN Сonspectus СONSPECTUS DIRK L. COUPRIE The Paths of the Celestial Bodies According to Anaximenes . 5 MARIA KAZANSKAYA A Ghost Proverb in Herodotus (6. 129. 4)? . 33 З. А. БАРЗАХ Использование разговорных идиом в трагедиях Софокла . 53 SERGEY V. K ASHAEV, NATALIA PAVLICHENKO Letter on an Ostracon From the Settlement of Vyshesteblievskaya-3 . 61 ANTONIO CORSO Retrieving the Aphrodite of Hermogenes of Cythera . 80 ARSENIJ VETUSHKO-KALEVICH Batăvi oder Batāvi? Zu Luc. Phars. I, 430–440 . 90 ARCHAEOLOGICA DMITRIJ CHISTOV Investigations on the Berezan Island, 2006–2013 (Hermitage Museum Archaeological Mission) . 106 VLADIMIR KHRSHANOVSKIY An Investigation of the Necropoleis of Kytaion and the Iluraton Plateau (2006–2013) . 111 OLGA SOKOLOVA The Nymphaion expedition of the State Hermitage Museum (2006–2013) 121 ALEXANDER BUTYAGIN Excavations at Myrmekion in 2006–2013 . 127 Статьи сопровождаются резюме на русском и английском языке Summary in Russian and English 3 4 Сonspectus MARINA JU. VAKHTINA Porthmion Archaeological Expedition of the Institute for History of Material Culture, RAS – Institute of Archaeology, NASU . 135 SERGEY V. K ASHAEV The Taman Detachment of the Bosporan Expedition of IIMK RAS, 2006–2013 . 140 YURIJ A. VINOGRADOV Excavations at the Settlement of Artyushchenko–I (Bugazskoe) on the Taman Peninsula . 157 VLADIMIR GORONCHAROVSKIY The Townsite of Semibratneye (Labrys) Results of Excavations in 2006–2009 . 161 DISPUTATIONES SANDRA FAIT Peter Riedlberger, Domninus of Larissa, Encheiridion and Spurious Works.
  • Open Banjo Dissertation2.Pdf

    Open Banjo Dissertation2.Pdf

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Communications WHAT ARE YOU LAUGHING AT? EXAMINING PREDICTORS OF WHITES’ ENJOYMENT OF BLACK ENTERTAINMENT A Dissertation in Mass Communication by Omotayo O. Banjo © 2009 Omotayo O. Banjo Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2009 ii The dissertation of Omotayo O. Banjo was reviewed and approved* by the following Mary Beth Oliver Professor of Communications Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee S. Shyam Sundar Professor of Communications Matthew P. McAllister Associate Professor of Communications Deborah F. Atwater Associate Professor Emerita of Communication Arts & Sciences and African and African American Studies John Nichols Associate Dean of Graduate Studies *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Studies of race and media have established significant negative effects of stereotype on viewers, both Black and White. Audience reception studies have also revealed that regardless of perceived offensiveness of stereotype entertainment, audience consumption is not necessarily inhibited. Whereas ethnic humor scholars purport that groups disparaged through stereotype derive enjoyment through a sense of connection and identification, few studies have examined out-group members’ enjoyment experience of the same disparaging content. The present study aims to examine possible predictors of Whites’ enjoyment of stereotype entertainment when Black and Whites are the target. According to disposition theory, this study argued that negative attitudes towards Blacks through the lens of White racial superiority would predict greater enjoyment of Black disparagement. As a competing hypothesis, distinctiveness theory would imply that White audiences may be more likely to report enjoyment of stereotype, regardless of the target.