DOCSLIB.ORG

Gel Electrophoresis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gel Electrophoresis Gel electrophoresis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Digital image of 3 plasmid restriction digests run on a 1% w/v agarose gel, 3 volt/cm, stained with ethidium bromide. The DNA size marker is a commercial 1 kbp ladder. The position of the wells and direction of DNA migration is noted. Gel electrophoresis is a method for separation and analysis of macromolecules (DNA, RNA and proteins) and their fragments, based on their size and charge. It is used in clinical chemistry to separate proteins by charge and/or size (IEF agarose, essentially size independent) and in biochemistry and molecular biology to separate a mixed population of DNA and RNA fragments by length, to estimate the size of DNA and RNA fragments or to separate proteins by charge.[1] Nucleic acid molecules are separated by applying an electric field to move the negatively charged molecules through an agarose matrix. Shorter molecules move faster and migrate farther than longer ones because shorter molecules migrate more easily through the pores of the gel. This phenomenon is called sieving.[2] Proteins are separated by charge in agarose because the pores of the gel are too large to sieve proteins. Gel electrophoresis can also be used for separation of nanoparticles. Gel electrophoresis uses a gel as an anticonvective medium and/or sieving medium during electrophoresis, the movement of a charged particle in an electrical field. Gels suppress the thermal convection caused by application of the electric field, and can also act as a sieving medium, retarding the passage of molecules; gels can also simply serve to maintain the finished separation, so that a post electrophoresis stain can be applied.[3] DNA Gel electrophoresis is usually performed for analytical purposes, often after amplification of DNA via PCR, but may be used as a preparative technique prior to use of other methods such as mass spectrometry, RFLP, PCR, cloning, DNA sequencing, or Southern blotting for further characterization. Physical basis[edit] In simple terms: Electrophoresis is a process which enables the sorting of molecules based on size. Using an electric field, molecules (such as DNA) can be made to move through a gel made of agar or polyacrylamide. The electric field consists of a negative charge at one end which pushes the molecules through the gel, and a positive charge at the other end that pulls the molecules through the gel. The molecules being sorted are dispensed into a well in the gel material. The gel is placed in an electrophoresis chamber, which is then connected to a power source. When the electric current is applied, the larger molecules move more slowly through the gel while the smaller molecules move faster. The different sized molecules form distinct bands on the gel.[citation needed] The term "gel" in this instance refers to the matrix used to contain, then separate the target molecules. In most cases, the gel is a crosslinked polymer whose composition and porosity is chosen based on the specific weight and composition of the target to be analyzed. When separating proteins or small nucleic acids (DNA, RNA, or oligonucleotides) the gel is usually composed of different concentrations of acrylamide and a cross-linker, producing different sized mesh networks of polyacrylamide. When separating larger nucleic acids (greater than a few hundred bases), the preferred matrix is purified agarose. In both cases, the gel forms a solid, yet porous matrix. Acrylamide, in contrast to polyacrylamide, is a neurotoxin and must be handled using appropriate safety precautions to avoid poisoning. Agarose is composed of long unbranched chains of uncharged carbohydrate without cross links resulting in a gel with large pores allowing for the separation of macromolecules and macromolecular complexes.[citation needed] "Electrophoresis" refers to the electromotive force (EMF) that is used to move the molecules through the gel matrix. By placing the molecules in wells in the gel and applying an electric field, the molecules will move through the matrix at different rates, determined largely by their mass when the charge to mass ratio (Z) of all species is uniform. However when charges are not all uniform then, the electrical field generated by the electrophoresis procedure will affect the species that have different charges and therefore will attract the species according to their charges being the opposite. Species that are positively charged (cations) will migrate towards the cathode which is negatively charged. If the species are negatively charged (anions) they will migrate towards the positively charged anode.[4] If several samples have been loaded into adjacent wells in the gel, they will run parallel in individual lanes. Depending on the number of different molecules, each lane shows separation of the components from the original mixture as one or more distinct bands, one band per component. Incomplete separation of the components can lead to overlapping bands, or to indistinguishable smears representing multiple unresolved components.[citation needed] Bands in different lanes that end up at the same distance from the top contain molecules that passed through the gel with the same speed, which usually means they are approximately the same size. There are molecular weight size markers available that contain a mixture of molecules of known sizes. If such a marker was run on one lane in the gel parallel to the unknown samples, the bands observed can be compared to those of the unknown in order to determine their size. The distance a band travels is approximately inversely proportional to the logarithm of the size of the molecule.[citation needed] There are limits to electrophoretic techniques. Since passing current through a gel causes heating, gels may melt during electrophoresis. Electrophoresis is performed in buffer solutions to reduce pH changes due to the electric field, which is important because the charge of DNA and RNA depends on pH, but running for too long can exhaust the buffering capacity of the solution. Further, different preparations of genetic material may not migrate consistently with each other, for morphological or other reasons. Types of gel[edit] The types of gel most typically used are agarose and polyacrylamide gels. Each type of gel is well-suited to different types and sizes of analyte. Polyacrylamide gels are usually used for proteins, and have very high resolving power for small fragments of DNA (5-500 bp). Agarose gels on the other hand have lower resolving power for DNA but have greater range of separation, and are therefore used for DNA fragments of usually 50-20,000 bp in size, but resolution of over 6 Mb is possible with pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).[5] Polyacrylamide gels are run in a vertical configuration while agarose gels are typically run horizontally in a submarine mode. They also differ in their casting methodology, as agarose sets thermally, while polyacrylamide forms in a chemical polymerization reaction. Agarose[edit] Main article: Agarose gel electrophoresis Agarose gels are easily cast and handled compared to other matrices, because the gel setting is a physical rather than chemical change. Samples are also easily recovered. After the experiment is finished, the resulting gel can be stored in a plastic bag in a refrigerator. Agarose gels do not have a uniform pore size, but are optimal for electrophoresis of proteins that are larger than 200 kDa.[6] Agarose gel electrophoresis can also be used for the separation of DNA fragments ranging from 50 base pair to several megabases (millions of bases), the largest of which require specialized apparatus. The distance between DNA bands of different lengths is influenced by the percent agarose in the gel, with higher percentages requiring longer run times, sometimes days. Instead high percentage agarose gels should be run with a pulsed field electrophoresis (PFE), or field inversion electrophoresis. "Most agarose gels are made with between 0.7% (good separation or resolution of large 5– 10kb DNA fragments) and 2% (good resolution for small 0.2–1kb fragments) agarose dissolved in electrophoresis buffer. Up to 3% can be used for separating very tiny fragments but a vertical polyacrylamide gel is more appropriate in this case. Low percentage gels are very weak and may break when you try to lift them. High percentage gels are often brittle and do not set evenly. 1% gels are common for many applications."[7] Polyacrylamide[edit] Main article: Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) is used for separating proteins ranging in size from 5 to 2,000 kDa due to the uniform pore size provided by the polyacrylamide gel. Pore size is controlled by controlling the concentrations of acrylamide and bis-acrylamide powder used in creating a gel. Care must be used when creating this type of gel, as acrylamide is a potent neurotoxin in its liquid and powdered form. Traditional DNA sequencing techniques such as Maxam-Gilbert or Sanger methods used polyacrylamide gels to separate DNA fragments differing by a single base-pair in length so the sequence could be read. Most modern DNA separation methods now use agarose gels, except for particularly small DNA fragments. It is currently most often used in the field of immunology and protein analysis, often used to separate different proteins or isoforms of the same protein into separate bands. These can be transferred onto a nitrocellulose or PVDF membrane to be probed with antibodies and corresponding markers, such as in a western blot. Typically resolving gels are made in 6%, 8%, 10%, 12% or 15%. Stacking gel (5%) is poured on top of the resolving gel and a gel comb (which forms the wells and defines the lanes where proteins, sample buffer and ladders will be placed) is inserted. The percentage chosen depends on the size of the protein that one wishes to identify or probe in the sample.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Materials and Method Immunostaining and Western Blot
    Supplementary Materials and Method Immunostaining and Western Blot Analysis For immunofluorescence staining, mouse and human cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde- PBS for 15 min. Following Triton-X100 permeabilization and blocking, cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C following with Alexa 594-conjugated secondary antibodies at 4°C for 1 hour (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:1000). Samples were mounted using VECTASHIELD Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories) and immunofluorescence was detected using Olympus confocal microscopy. For western blot analysis, cells were lysed on ice using RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma). Primary Antibodies for Immunostaining and Western Blot Analysis: Yap (14074, Cell Signaling), pYAP (4911, Cell Signaling), Lats1 (3477, Cell Signaling), pLats1( 8654, Cell Signaling), Wnt5a (2530, Cell Signaling), cleaved Caspase-3 (9661, Cell Signaling), Ki-67 (VP-K451, Vector Laboratories), Cyr61 (sc-13100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), CTGF (sc-14939, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), AXL (8661, Cell Signaling), pErk (4376, Cell Signaling), pMEK (4376, Cell Signaling), Ck-19 (16858-1-AP, Proteintech), Actin (A2228, Sigma Aldrich), Vinculin (V4139, Sigma Aldrich), Kras (sc-30, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Ectopic expression of YAP1 and WNT5A in mouse and human cells To generate YAP1S127A-expressing stable Pa04C cells, Pa04C cells were transfected with a linearized pcDNA3.1 plasmid with or without YAP1 cDNA containing S127A substitution. Two days post-transfection using Lipofectamine1000, cultures were selected in G418 (Sigma) and single clones were picked and expanded for further analysis. Overexpression of YAPS127A or WNT5A in human or mouse cells other than Pa04C were acheieved with lentivral infection. Briefly, lentivirus infection was performed by transfecting 293T cells with either GFP control, YAP1S127A, or WNT5A cloned in pHAGE lentivirus vector {EF1α promoter-GW-IRES-eGFP (GW: Gateway modified)}.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Mechanisms of Oligomer and Amyloid Fibril Formation by the Prion Protein Cite This: Chem
    ChemComm View Article Online FEATURE ARTICLE View Journal | View Issue Structural mechanisms of oligomer and amyloid fibril formation by the prion protein Cite this: Chem. Commun., 2018, 54,6230 Ishita Sengupta a and Jayant B. Udgaonkar *b Misfolding and aggregation of the prion protein is responsible for multiple neurodegenerative diseases. Works from several laboratories on folding of both the WT and multiple pathogenic mutant variants of the prion protein have identified several structurally dissimilar intermediates, which might be potential precursors to misfolding and aggregation. The misfolded aggregates themselves are morphologically distinct, critically dependent on the solution conditions under which they are prepared, but always b-sheet rich. Despite the lack of an atomic resolution structure of the infectious pathogenic agent in prion diseases, several low resolution models have identified the b-sheet rich core of the aggregates formed in vitro, to lie in the a2–a3 subdomain of the prion protein, albeit with local stabilities that vary Received 17th April 2018, with the type of aggregate. This feature article describes recent advances in the investigation of in vitro Accepted 14th May 2018 prion protein aggregation using multiple spectroscopic probes, with particular focus on (1) identifying DOI: 10.1039/c8cc03053g aggregation-prone conformations of the monomeric protein, (2) conditions which trigger misfolding and oligomerization, (3) the mechanism of misfolding and aggregation, and (4) the structure of the misfolded rsc.li/chemcomm intermediates and final aggregates. 1. Introduction The prion protein can exist in two distinct structural isoforms: a National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, PrPC and PrPSc.
    [Show full text]
  • Blotting Techniques Blotting Is the Technique in Which Nucleic Acids Or
    Blotting techniques Blotting is the technique in which nucleic acids or proteins are immobilized onto a solid support generally nylon or nitrocellulose membranes. Blotting of nucleic acid is the central technique for hybridization studies. Nucleic acid labeling and hybridization on membranes have formed the basis for a range of experimental techniques involving understanding of gene expression, organization, etc. Identifying and measuring specific proteins in complex biological mixtures, such as blood, have long been important goals in scientific and diagnostic practice. More recently the identification of abnormal genes in genomic DNA has become increasingly important in clinical research and genetic counseling. Blotting techniques are used to identify unique proteins and nucleic acid sequences. They have been developed to be highly specific and sensitive and have become important tools in both molecular biology and clinical research. General principle The blotting methods are fairly simple and usually consist of four separate steps: electrophoretic separation of protein or of nucleic acid fragments in the sample; transfer to and immobilization on paper support; binding of analytical probe to target molecule on paper; and visualization of bound probe. Molecules in a sample are first separated by electrophoresis and then transferred on to an easily handled support medium or membrane. This immobilizes the protein or DNA fragments, provides a faithful replica of the original separation, and facilitates subsequent biochemical analysis. After being transferred to the support medium the immobilized protein or nucleic acid fragment is localized by the use of probes, such as antibodies or DNA, that specifically bind to the molecule of interest. Finally, the position of the probe that is bound to the immobilized target molecule is visualized usually by autoradiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Blotting Guidebook
    Western Blotting Guidebook Substrate Substrate Secondary Secondary Antibody Antibody Primary Primary Antibody Antibody Protein A Protein B 1 About Azure Biosystems At Azure Biosystems, we develop easy-to-use, high-performance imaging systems and high-quality reagents for life science research. By bringing a fresh approach to instrument design, technology, and user interface, we move past incremental improvements and go straight to innovations that substantially advance what a scientist can do. And in focusing on getting the highest quality data from these instruments—low backgrounds, sensitive detection, robust quantitation—we’ve created a line of reagents that consistently delivers reproducible results and streamlines workflows. Providing scientists around the globe with high-caliber products for life science research, Azure Biosystems’ innovations open the door to boundless scientific insights. Learn more at azurebiosystems.com. cSeries Imagers Sapphire Ao Absorbance Reagents & Biomolecular Imager Microplate Reader Blotting Accessories Corporate Headquarters 6747 Sierra Court Phone: (925) 307-7127 Please send purchase orders to: Suite A-B (9am–4pm Pacific time) [email protected] Dublin, CA 94568 To dial from outside of the US: For product inquiries, please email USA +1 925 307 7127 [email protected] FAX: (925) 905-1816 www.azurebiosystems.com • [email protected] Copyright © 2018 Azure Biosystems. All rights reserved. The Azure Biosystems logo, Azure Biosystems™, cSeries™, Sapphire™ and Radiance™ are trademarks of Azure Biosystems, Inc. More information about Azure Biosystems intellectual property assets, including patents, trademarks and copyrights, is available at www.azurebiosystems.com or by contacting us by phone or email. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Native-Like Mean Structure in the Unfolded Ensemble of Small Proteins
    B doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00888-4 available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on w J. Mol. Biol. (2002) 323, 153–164 Native-like Mean Structure in the Unfolded Ensemble of Small Proteins Bojan Zagrovic1, Christopher D. Snow1, Siraj Khaliq2 Michael R. Shirts2 and Vijay S. Pande1,2* 1Biophysics Program The nature of the unfolded state plays a great role in our understanding of Stanford University, Stanford proteins. However, accurately studying the unfolded state with computer CA 94305-5080, USA simulation is difficult, due to its complexity and the great deal of sampling required. Using a supercluster of over 10,000 processors we 2Department of Chemistry have performed close to 800 ms of molecular dynamics simulation in Stanford University, Stanford atomistic detail of the folded and unfolded states of three polypeptides CA 94305-5080, USA from a range of structural classes: the all-alpha villin headpiece molecule, the beta hairpin tryptophan zipper, and a designed alpha-beta zinc finger mimic. A comparison between the folded and the unfolded ensembles reveals that, even though virtually none of the individual members of the unfolded ensemble exhibits native-like features, the mean unfolded structure (averaged over the entire unfolded ensemble) has a native-like geometry. This suggests several novel implications for protein folding and structure prediction as well as new interpretations for experiments which find structure in ensemble-averaged measurements. q 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved Keywords: mean-structure hypothesis; unfolded state of proteins; *Corresponding author distributed computing; conformational averaging Introduction under folding conditions, with some notable exceptions.14 – 16 This is understandable since under Historically, the unfolded state of proteins has such conditions the unfolded state is an unstable, received significantly less attention than the folded fleeting species making any kind of quantitative state.1 The reasons for this are primarily its struc- experimental measurement very difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Factor: 3.958/ICV: 4.10 ISSN: 0978-7908 192 REVIEW ON: ELECTROPHORESIS: METHOD for PROTEIN SEPARATION Shindedipa
    Impact factor: 3.958/ICV: 4.10 ISSN: 0978-7908 192 Pharma Science Monitor 7(2),Apr-Jun 2016 PHARMA SCIENCE MONITOR AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES Journal home page: http://www.pharmasm.com REVIEW ON: ELECTROPHORESIS: METHOD FOR PROTEIN SEPARATION ShindeDipa V.*, JasminaSurati Department of Quality Assurance, Shree NaranjibhaiLalbhai Patel College of Pharmacy,Umrakh -394 345,Bardoli, Gujarat, India. ABSTRACT Electrophoresis is one of the widely used techniques in molecular biochemistry, microbiology, biomedical research. It is a type of protein separation method .It is one of the highly efficient techniques of analysis and sole method for separation of proteins for western blot, RNA studies etc. It is a both qualitative and quantitative analysis technique. Separation depend upon electrophoretic mobility.Electrophoresis technique are of various type like Moving boundary electrophoresis ,Zone electrophoresis ,Affinity electrophoresis ,Pulsed field electrophoresis ,Dielectrophoresis.this technique mainly used in antibiotic analysis,vaccine analysis DNA analysis and protein analysis as well as fingerprint analysis. KEYWORDS:Electrophoresis, Electrophoretic mobility,Zone Electrophoresis, Moving boundary Electrophoresis, Dielectricphoresis. INTRODUCTION Electrophoresis is a physical method of analysis based on the migration of electrically charged proteins, colloids, molecules or other particles dissolved or dispersed in an electrolyte solution in the direction of the electrode bearing the opposite polarity when an electric current is passed through it. Separations may be conducted in systems without support phases (such as free solution separation in capillary electrophoresis) or in stabilising media such as thin-later plates, filins or gels. The electrophoretic mobility is the rate of movement in metres per second of the charged particles under the action of an electric field of I volt per metre and is expressed in square metres per volt second.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Energy Landscapes Via Calorimetric Detection of Microstate Ensembles of Metastable Macrostates and Triplet Repeat Diseases
    DNA energy landscapes via calorimetric detection of microstate ensembles of metastable macrostates and triplet repeat diseases Jens Vo¨ lkera, Horst H. Klumpb, and Kenneth J. Breslauera,c,1 aDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 610 Taylor Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854; bDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7800, South Africa; and cCancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Communicated by I. M. Gelfand, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, October 15, 2008 (received for review September 8, 2008) Biopolymers exhibit rough energy landscapes, thereby allowing biological role(s), if any, of kinetically stable (metastable) mi- biological processes to access a broad range of kinetic and ther- crostates that make up the time-averaged, native state ensembles modynamic states. In contrast to proteins, the energy landscapes of macroscopic nucleic acid states remains to be determined. of nucleic acids have been the subject of relatively few experimen- As part of an effort to address this deficiency, we report here tal investigations. In this study, we use calorimetric and spectro- experimental evidence for the presence of discrete microstates scopic observables to detect, resolve, and selectively enrich ener- in metastable triplet repeat bulge looped ⍀-DNAs of potential getically discrete ensembles of microstates within metastable DNA biological significance. The specific triplet repeat bulge looped structures. Our results are consistent with metastable, ‘‘native’’ ⍀-DNA species investigated mimic slipped DNA structures DNA states being composed of an ensemble of discrete and corresponding to intermediates in the processes that lead to kinetically stable microstates of differential stabilities, rather than DNA expansion in triplet repeat diseases (36).
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Blotting Guide
    Electrophoresis and Blotting Protein Blotting Guide BEGIN Protein Blotting Guide Theory and Products Part 1 Theory and Products 5 Chapter 5 Detection and Imaging 29 Total Protein Detection 31 Transfer Buffer Formulations 58 5 Chapter 1 Overview of Protein Blotting Anionic Dyes 31 Towbin Buffer 58 Towbin Buffer with SDS 58 Transfer 6 Fluorescent Protein Stains 31 Stain-Free Technology 32 Bjerrum Schafer-Nielsen Buffer 58 Detection 6 Colloidal Gold 32 Bjerrum Schafer-Nielsen Buffer with SDS 58 CAPS Buffer 58 General Considerations and Workflow 6 Immunodetection 32 Dunn Carbonate Buffer 58 Immunodetection Workflow 33 0.7% Acetic Acid 58 Chapter 2 Methods and Instrumentation 9 Blocking 33 Protein Blotting Methods 10 Antibody Incubations 33 Detection Buffer Formulations 58 Electrophoretic Transfer 10 Washes 33 General Detection Buffers 58 Tank Blotting 10 Antibody Selection and Dilution 34 Total Protein Staining Buffers and Solutions 59 Semi-Dry Blotting 11 Primary Antibodies 34 Substrate Buffers and Solutions 60 Microfiltration (Dot Blotting) Species-Specific Secondary Antibodies 34 Stripping Buffer 60 Antibody-Specific Ligands 34 Blotting Systems and Power Supplies 12 Detection Methods 35 Tank Blotting Cells 12 Colorimetric Detection 36 Part 3 Troubleshooting 63 Mini Trans-Blot® Cell and Criterion™ Blotter 12 Premixed and Individual Colorimetric Substrates 38 Transfer 64 Trans-Blot® Cell 12 Immun-Blot® Assay Kits 38 Electrophoretic Transfer 64 Trans-Blot® Plus Cell 13 Immun-Blot Amplified AP Kit 38 Microfiltration 65 Semi-Dry Blotting Cells
    [Show full text]
  • Western Blot Handbook
    Novus-lu-2945 Western Blot Handbook Learn more | novusbio.com Learn more | novusbio.com INTRODUCTION TO WESTERN BLOTTING Western blotting uses antibodies to identify individual proteins within a cell or tissue lysate. Antibodies bind to highly specific sequences of amino acids, known as epitopes. Because amino acid sequences vary from protein to protein, western blotting analysis can be used to identify and quantify a single protein in a lysate that contains thousands of different proteins First, proteins are separated from each other based on their size by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. Next, the proteins are transferred from the gel to a membrane by application of an electrical current. The membrane can then be processed with primary antibodies specific for target proteins of interest. Next, secondary antibodies bound to enzymes are applied and finally a substrate that reacts with the secondary antibody-bound enzyme is added for detection of the antibody/protein complex. This step-by-step guide is intended to serve as a starting point for understanding, performing, and troubleshooting a standard western blotting protocol. Learn more | novusbio.com Learn more | novusbio.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1-2 Controls Positive control lysate Negative control lysate Endogenous control lysate Loading controls 3-6 Sample Preparation Lysis Protease and phosphatase inhibitors Carrying out lysis Example lysate preparation from cell culture protocol Determination of protein concentration Preparation of samples for gel loading Sample preparation protocol 7
    [Show full text]
  • Electrophoresis SUBJECT FORENSIC SCIENCE
    SUBJECT FORENSIC SCIENCE Paper No. and Title PAPER No. 4: Instrumental Methods and Analysis Module No. and Title MODULE No. 34: Electrophoresis Module Tag FSC_P4_M34 FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No.4: Instrumental Methods and Analysis MODULE No.34: Electrophoresis TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Principle and Methodology 4. Classification of Electrophoretic Techniques 5. Common Mediums used in Electrophoresis 6. Types of Electrophoresis 7. Summary FORENSIC SCIENCE PAPER No.4: Instrumental Methods and Analysis MODULE No.34: Electrophoresis 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module, you shall be able to know about: The significance of Electrophoresis The basic principle and methodology of Electrophoresis The types and application of Electrophoresis 2. Introduction Electrophoresis may be defined as the migration of colloidal particles through a solution under the influence of an electrical field. Electrophoresis basically is the movement of distributed particles corresponding to a fluid under the influence of electric field. Electrophoresis is mostly known as еlеctro - kinеtic phеnomеna. Thе tеchniquе of еlеctrophorеsis was discovеrеd by Rеuss in 1809 whеn hе еxpеrimеntеd that soil particlеs dispеrsеd in watеr migratе undеr еffеct of an appliеd еlеctric fiеld. Еlеctrophorеsis takеs placе bеcausе particlеs dispеrsеd in a fluid nеarly at all times carry an electric surface charge. The charged molecule migrates to their oppositely charged electrodes but that electric field is removed before it reaches there completely. Passage of charged particle in an electric field provides differential motion to the sample on the basis of charge and consequently resolve them. An electric field exerts electrostatic Coulomb forcе on thе particlеs through thеsе chargеs.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformational Search for the Protein Native State
    CHAPTER 19 CONFORMATIONAL SEARCH FOR THE PROTEIN NATIVE STATE Amarda Shehu Assistant Professor Dept. of Comp. Sci. Al. Appnt. Dept. of Comp. Biol. and Bioinf. George Mason University 4400 University Blvd. MSN 4A5 Fairfax, Virginia, 22030, USA Abstract This chapter presents a survey of computational methods that obtain a struc- tural description of the protein native state. This description is important to understand a protein's biological function. The chapter presents the problem of characterizing the native state in conformational detail in terms of the chal- lenges that it raises in computation. Computing the conformations populated by a protein under native conditions is cast as a search problem. Methods such as Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo are treated rst. Multiscaling, the combination of reduced and high complexity models of conformations, is briey summarized as a powerful strategy to rapidly extract important fea- tures of the energy surface associated with the protein conformational space. Other strategies that narrow the search space through information obtained in the wet lab are also presented. The chapter then focuses on enhanced sam- Protein Structure Prediction:Method and Algorithms. By H. Rangwala & G. Karypis 1 Copyright c 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2 CONFORMATIONAL SEARCH FOR THE PROTEIN NATIVE STATE pling strategies employed to compute native-like conformations when given only amino-acid sequence. Fragment-based assembly methods are analyzed for their success and what they are revealing about the physical process of folding. The chapter concludes with a discussion of future research directions in the computational quest for the protein native state. 19.1 THE QUEST FOR THE PROTEIN NATIVE STATE From the rst formulation of the protein folding problem by Wu in 1931 to the experiments of Mirsky and Pauling in 1936, chemical and physical properties of protein molecules were attributed to the amino-acid composition and structural arrangement of the protein chain [86, 56].
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Folding Kinetics of a Small, Artificially Selected DNA Aptamer with Those of Equivalently Simple Naturally Occurring Proteins
    A comparison of the folding kinetics of a small, artificially selected DNA aptamer with those of equivalently simple naturally occurring proteins Camille Lawrence,1 Alexis Vallee-B elisle, 2,3 Shawn H. Pfeil,4,5 Derek de Mornay,2 Everett A. Lipman,1,4 and Kevin W. Plaxco1,2* 1Interdepartmental Program in Biomolecular Science and Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 3Laboratory of Biosensors and Nanomachines, Departement de Chimie, Universite de Montreal, Quebec, Canada 4Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 5Department of Physics, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19383 Received 16 July 2013; Revised 17 October 2013; Accepted 23 October 2013 DOI: 10.1002/pro.2390 Published online 29 October 2013 proteinscience.org Abstract: The folding of larger proteins generally differs from the folding of similarly large nucleic acids in the number and stability of the intermediates involved. To date, however, no similar com- parison has been made between the folding of smaller proteins, which typically fold without well- populated intermediates, and the folding of small, simple nucleic acids. In response, in this study, we compare the folding of a 38-base DNA aptamer with the folding of a set of equivalently simple proteins. We find that, as is true for the large majority of simple, single domain proteins, the aptamer folds through a concerted, millisecond-scale process lacking well-populated intermedi- ates. Perhaps surprisingly, the observed folding rate falls within error of a previously described relationship between the folding kinetics of single-domain proteins and their native state topology.
    [Show full text]