DOCSLIB.ORG

Olearia Lineata and Not-Threatened Olearia Bullata in Human-Modified Environments and Implications for Their Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Olearia Lineata and Not-Threatened Olearia Bullata in Human-Modified Environments and Implications for Their Conservation Ecology of the declining Olearia lineata and not-threatened Olearia bullata in human-modified environments and implications for their conservation Olearia lineata population in Gorge Creek, Alexandra. 1 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In ECOLOGY at the University of Canterbury By Michelle Teresa Lambert School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand 2015 2 Table of Contents Ecology of the declining Olearia lineata and not-threatened Olearia bullata in human- modified environments and implications for their conservation .............................................. 1 Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 6 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................. 9 Background .............................................................................................................................. 10 Biodiversity decline and key drivers ................................................................................................. 10 Land-use modification ...................................................................................................................... 10 Biotic exchange- invasion of exotic species ...................................................................................... 11 Interactive effects of land-use change and biotic exchange ............................................................ 12 How species differ in their response to environmental change ....................................................... 13 Biodiversity loss and plant-animal interactions ................................................................................ 13 Land-use change and species invasion in New Zealand ................................................................... 14 Demographics of native species ....................................................................................................... 15 Why study these species? ........................................................................................................ 16 Biology and ecology of Olearia bullata and Olearia lineata ............................................................. 16 Olearia bullata H.D. Wilson & Garn.-Jones 1992 .............................................................................. 17 Olearia lineata (Kirk) Cockayne 1911 ................................................................................................ 18 Importance of Olearia lineata and Olearia bullata ........................................................................... 20 Importance of Olearia bullata and Olearia lineata for Invertebrates ........................................... 21 Importance of Olearia bullata and Olearia lineata for ecosystems .............................................. 22 Importance of Olearia bullata and Olearia lineata for succession ................................................ 22 Aim of Research ....................................................................................................................... 23 Chapter 2: Population Demographics and Community Composition of Olearia lineata and Olearia bullata ......................................................................................................................... 24 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 25 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 28 Site selection and Sampling .............................................................................................................. 28 Population Demographic Structure of O. lineata and O. bullata ...................................................... 29 Abiotic and Biotic Attributes, and Vegetation Community Composition for O. lineata and O. bullata .......................................................................................................................................................... 30 RECCE plot method- Abiotic Attributes ........................................................................................ 31 3 RECCE plot method- Biotic Attributes and Vegetation Community Composition ........................ 31 Data analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Population Demographic Structure of O. lineata and O. bullata ...................................................... 32 Abiotic and Biotic Attributes, and Vegetation Community Composition for O. lineata and O.bullata .......................................................................................................................................................... 32 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 33 Population Demographic Structure of O. lineata and O. bullata ...................................................... 33 Abiotic and Biotic Attributes, and Vegetation Community Composition for O. lineata and O.bullata .......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Abiotic attributes: ......................................................................................................................... 35 Biotic attributes: ........................................................................................................................... 36 Vegetation Community Composition of O. lineata and O. bullata sites ........................................... 37 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 41 Community attributes- abiotic, biotic and species composition characteristics .............................. 41 Population Demographics of O. lineata and O. bullata .................................................................... 43 Chapter 3: ................................................................................................................................. 50 The effect of an invasive species and light availability on O. lineata and O. bullata .............. 50 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 51 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 54 Germination experiment .................................................................................................................. 55 Preliminary seed germination trial ............................................................................................... 55 Main Germination Experiment ..................................................................................................... 55 Data analysis ................................................................................................................................. 56 Competition experiment ................................................................................................................... 58 Data analysis ................................................................................................................................. 60 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 63 Germination experiment .................................................................................................................. 63 Germination success ..................................................................................................................... 63 Germination over time .................................................................................................................. 64 Competition Experiment ................................................................................................................... 65 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 69 Competitive effects of grass ......................................................................................................... 71 How do exotic grasses invade communities? .............................................................................. 74 Chapter 4- Lepidoptera and host reliance ............................................................................... 76 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 77 4 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 79 Field sampling ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae): the First Report from Turkey and a Case of Importation to Poland
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2016) 40: http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1512-22 Anatrachyntis badia (Hodges, 1962) (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae): the first report from Turkey and a case of importation to Poland Łukasz DAWIDOWICZ*, Robert ROZWAŁKA Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland Received: 07.12.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 03.05.2016 Final Version: 00.00.2016 Abstract: Anatrachyntis badia (Hodges, 1962) (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae) is an opportunistic species native to the southern part of North America. This species was given from several dozens of plants therein from many cultivable plants, such as limes, grapefruits, bananas, peaches, cabbage, blossoms of coconut, Cycas spp., and even pine cones. Thus, it was accidentally introduced to many other countries with appropriate climate with some plants. It can be considered as a plant pest in some cases (e.g., sorghum). The species quite often occurs conjointly with other pest insects, such as mealybug or honeydew mothCryptoblabes gnidiella (Millière, 1867) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). This paper presents the first report of this North American species from Turkey and a case of its importation to Poland by pomegranates deriving from Spain and Turkey. The mentioned data simultaneously constitute the first records about the species in Poland. Key words: Alien species, introduction, pest, pomegranate, first record, Poland, Turkey, Spain 1. Introduction and Sinev, 2003; Heckford and Sterling, 2004) (Figure The genus Anatrachyntis Meyrick 1915 comprises more 1). A. badia has a reddish brown head, reddish brown than 50 moths species, mostly abundant in the Oriental thorax with mixed darker brown, dark grayish posteriorly.
    [Show full text]
  • Nzbotsoc No 86 Dec 2006
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 86 DECEMBER 2006 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2006 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2006 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the March 2007 issue is 25 February 2007 Please post contributions to: Melanie Newfield 17 Homebush Rd Khandallah Wellington Send email contributions to [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word (Word XP or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Section Reports
    DACS-P-00124 Volume 54, Number 5, September - October 2015 DPI’s Bureau of Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology (the botany section is included in this bureau) produces TRI- OLOGY six times a year, covering two months of activity in each issue. The report includes detection activities from nursery plant inspections, routine and emergency program surveys, and requests for identification of plants and pests from the public. Samples are also occasionally sent from other states or countries for identification or diagnosis. Highlights Following are a few of the notable entries from this Section Reports volume of TRI-OLOGY. These entries are reports of interesting plants or unusual pests, some of Botany 2 which may be problematic. See Section Reports for complete information. Entomology 6 Bactrocera dorsalis, Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, Oriental fruit fly. Based on female Nematology 10 Photograph courtesy of Gary J. Steck, the large number of flies detected in a concentrated DPI area of the Redland Agricultural District in late Plant Pathology 12 August, a quarantine area regulating the movement of oriental fruit fly host plants was established on 4 September 2015. All entities within the quarantine area of 98 square miles that are involved with the production, sale or distribution of oriental fruit fly host material have been placed under a compliance agreement outlining operational procedures and Pseudocercospora artanthes typical program requirements. irregular leaf spots caused by the fungal pathogen on Piper auritum (Vera Cruz Pseudocercospora artanthes (leaf spot) was found pepper). infecting Piper auritum (Vera Cruz pepper) at the Photograph courtesy of Robert M. Leahy, USDA Jacksonville Zoo and Gardens in Duval County.
    [Show full text]
  • Set 3 Plains Plant List AA
    Food for native birds: AKEAKE – riroriro – ngaio, F = Fruit S = Bird Seed N = Nectar old dune ecosystem B = Bud/foliage I = Insects For lizards: L = fruit Plant Tolerances ■ = tolerates or needs □ = intolerant ½ = tolerant of some * = to establish, protect from frost t = toxic for toddlers Plants keyed to landform units, as shown in diagram: (F) = Foredune; (M) = Mid-dune; (B) = Back dune; (S) = Sand flats/plains; (H) = Swampy hollow; (E) / (O) = edge plants of back and old dunes PLANT LISTS Selected from vegetation natural to these droughty Waikuku soils Tolerances TREES & TALL SHRUBS Food sun shade wet dry wind Coprosma robusta karamu (B, O) F ■ ■ ■ ½ ½ Cordyline australis ti kouka, cabbage tree (B, S, H, O) F,N,I ■ ½ ■ ■ ■ Discaria toumatou matagouri (M, B, S, O) I ■ □ □ ■ ■ Dodonaea viscosa akeake (M, B, O)* ■ ½ □ ■ ■ Griselinia littoralis broadleaf, kapuka (B, O) F,N,I ■ ■ ½ ■ ■ Hoheria angustifolia houhere, narrow-leaved lacebark (O) I ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ Kunzea ericoides kanuka (O) N,I ■ □ □ ■ ■ Leptospermum scoparium manuka, tea tree (B, S, H) N,I ■ □ ■ ■ ■ Melicytus ramiflorus mahoe, whiteywood (B, O)* N,B,I ½ ■ ½ ½ ½ Myoporum laetum ngaio (M, B, O)* F,N ■ ½ □ ■ ■ t Myrsine australis mapau, red matipo (B, O)* F,L,I ■ ■ □ ½ ½ Olearia avicenniifolia akiraho, a tree daisy (B,O) S,I ■ ½ □ ■ ■ Olearia paniculata akiraho, golden akeake (B,O) S,I ■ ½ □ ■ ■ Pittosporum eugenioides tarata, lemonwood (O) F,I ■ ■ ½ ■ ½ Pittosporum tenuifolium kohuhu, black matipo, tawhari (B, O) F,I ■ ■ ½ ■ ■ Pseudopanax crassifolius lancewood, horoeka (O) F,N,I
    [Show full text]
  • Two Decades of Demography Reveals That Seed and Seedling Transitions Limit Population Persistence in a Translocated Shrub
    Annals of Botany 114: 85–96, 2014 doi:10.1093/aob/mcu082, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Two decades of demography reveals that seed and seedling transitions limit population persistence in a translocated shrub C. L. Gross* and D. Mackay Ecosystem Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-abstract/114/1/85/2768988 by guest on 02 October 2018 Received: 9 December 2013 Returned for revision: 10 March 2014 Accepted: 25 March 2014 Published electronically: 20 May 2014 † Background and Aims Olearia flocktoniae is an endangered shrub that was passively translocated from its natural ecosystem, where it has since gone extinct. This study aimed to determine sensitivities vital to populations persisting in human-created areas. † Methods Population colonization, longevity and extinction were investigated over 20 years using 133 populations. Seed-bank longevity was determined from germination trials of seeds exhumed from extinct and extant sites via a 10-year glasshouse trial and by in situ sowing experiments. From 27 populations, 98 cohorts were followed and matrix models of transitions from seeds to adults were used to evaluate the intrinsic rate of population growth against disturbance histories. Ten populations (38 cohorts) with different disturbance histories were used to evaluate sensitivities in vital rates. † Key Results Most populations had few individuals (30) and were transient (,5 years above ground). The intrinsic population growth ratewas rarely .1 and all but two populations were extinct at year 20. Seeds were short-lived in situ.
    [Show full text]
  • NZ BOT SOC Sept2014
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 117 September 2014 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8013 Webmaster: Murray Dawson URL: www.nzbotanicalsociety.org.nz Subscriptions The 2014 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2014 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $12 (reduced to $9 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $7.00 each. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the December 2014 issue is 25 November 2014. Please post contributions to: Lara Shepherd Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa 169 Tory St Wellington 6021 Send email contributions to [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word, as an open text document (Open Office document with suffix “.odt”) or saved as RTF or ASCII. Macintosh files can also be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Results on the Phytophagous Insect Fauna on Onopordum Acanthium (Asteraceae) in Bulgaria
    Pestic. Phytomed. (Belgrade), 25(4), 2010, 301-309 UDC: 591.617:632.51 Pestic. fitomed. (Beograd), 25(4), 2010, 301-309 Scientific paper * Naučni rad DOI: 10.2298/PIF1004301H Preliminary Results on the Phytophagous Insect Fauna on Onopordum acanthium (Asteraceae) in Bulgaria Vili Harizanova1, Atanaska Stoeva1, Massimo Cristofaro2, Allesandra Paolini2, Francesca Lecce2 and Franca Di Cristina2 1UAgricultural University-Plovdiv, Plovdiv 4000, Mendeleev 12, Bulgaria ([email protected]) 2ANEA C.R. Cassacia UTAGRI-ECO Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 S. Maria di Galeria (Rome), Italy Received: August 5, 2010 Accepted: November 3, 2010 SUMMARY The Scotch thistle, Onopordum acanthium (Asteraceae) has the Eurasian origin and represents an invasive weed in the USA and Australia. It is a serious problem in pastures, along roadsides, rangeland, etc. The weed is very common in Bulgaria and in 2009-2010 several sites with large populations of O. acanthium have been located. The weekly sur- veys of some of the sites, mainly in the region of Plovdiv, revealed a significant diver- sity of phytophagous insect species, some of which had very high population density. More than 30 species have already been identified and observations on the phenolo- gy and biology of some of them have been conducted. For some of the species, such as endophagous Larinus latus, Lixus cardui, Eublemma amoena, Trichosirocalus briesei, or ectophagous Cassida rubiginosa etc. found during our surveys, there are reports in the lit- erature describing them as having been already introduced as successful biocontrol agents in Australia. Endophagous species like lepidopteran Myelois circumvoluta and Pyroderces argyrogrammos which feed on the stems and the head, and the tephritid flies Tephritis pos- tica and Chaetostomella cylindrica which feed on the capitula, seem quite destructive for the weed, but need to be further studied regarding host specificity.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Texas Lepidoptera Knudson & Bordelon, Jan 2018 Texas Lepidoptera Survey
    1 Checklist of Texas Lepidoptera Knudson & Bordelon, Jan 2018 Texas Lepidoptera Survey ERIOCRANIOIDEA TISCHERIOIDEA ERIOCRANIIDAE TISCHERIIDAE Dyseriocrania griseocapitella (Wlsm.) Eriocraniella mediabulla Davis Coptotriche citripennella (Clem.) Eriocraniella platyptera Davis Coptotriche concolor (Zell.) Coptotriche purinosella (Cham.) Coptotriche clemensella (Cham). Coptotriche sulphurea (F&B) NEPTICULOIDEA Coptotriche zelleriella (Clem.) Tischeria quercitella Clem. NEPTICULIDAE Coptotriche malifoliella (Clem.) Coptotriche crataegifoliae (Braun) Ectoedemia platanella (Clem.) Coptotriche roseticola (F&B) Ectoedemia rubifoliella (Clem.) Coptotriche aenea (F&B) Ectoedemia ulmella (Braun) Asterotriche solidaginifoliella (Clem.) Ectoedemia obrutella (Zell.) Asterotriche heliopsisella (Cham.) Ectoedemia grandisella (Cham.) Asterotriche ambrosiaeella (Cham.) Nepticula macrocarpae Free. Asterotriche helianthi (F&B) Stigmella scintillans (Braun) Asterotriche heteroterae (F&B) Stigmella rhoifoliella (Braun) Asterotriche longeciliata (F&B) Stigmella rhamnicola (Braun) Asterotriche omissa (Braun) Stigmella villosella (Clem.) Asterotriche pulvella (Cham.) Stigmella apicialbella (Cham.) Stigmella populetorum (F&B) Stigmella saginella (Clem.) INCURVARIOIDEA Stigmella nigriverticella (Cham.) Stigmella flavipedella (Braun) PRODOXIDAE Stigmella ostryaefoliella (Clem.) Stigmella myricafoliella (Busck) Tegeticula yuccasella (Riley) Stigmella juglandifoliella (Clem.) Tegeticula baccatella Pellmyr Stigmella unifasciella (Cham.) Tegeticula carnerosanella Pellmyr
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity 13
    FAR Foundation ForFOCUS Arable Research Issue 13, July 2018 FOCUS ISSUE Biodiversity 13 • What do we mean by “biodiversity” • Eco-system services and the benefits for arable farms • The benefits of biodiversity plantings on arable farms • Biodiversity and arable soils ® ADDING VALUE TO THE BUSINESS OF CROPPING © Foundation for Arable Research (FAR) DISCLAIMER This publication is copyright to the Foundation for Arable Research and may not be reproduced or copied in any form whatsoever without written permission. This FAR Focus is intended to provide accurate and adequate information relating to the subject matters contained in it. It has been prepared and made available to all persons and entities strictly on the basis that FAR, its researchers and authors are fully excluded from any liability for damages arising out of any reliance in part or in full upon any of the information for any purpose. No endorsement of named products is intended nor is any criticism of other alternative, but unnamed product. DISCLAIMER Unless agreed otherwise, the New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited does not give any prediction, warranty or assurance in relation to the accuracy of or fitness for any particular use or application of, any information or scientific or other result contained in this FAR Focus. Neither Plant & Food Research nor any of its employees shall be liable for any cost (including legal costs), claim, liability, loss, damage, injury or the like, which may be suffered or incurred as a direct or indirect result of the reliance by any person on any information contained in this FAR Focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Olearia Fragrantissima
    Olearia fragrantissima COMMON NAME Fragrant tree daisy SYNONYMS None FAMILY Asteraceae AUTHORITY Olearia fragrantissima Petrie FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS No Heyward Point, Dunedin. Photographer: John Barkla ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE OLEFRA CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 108 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: PD Olearia fragrantissima. Photographer: John Smith-Dodsworth PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD, PD 2004 | Sparse BRIEF DESCRIPTION Small bushy shrub with many erect reddish brown zig-zagging twigs and sweet smelling small flowers inhabiting coastal areas from Banks Peninsula to Invercargill. Leaves 7.5-30mm long by 5-10mm wide, pointed, hairy when young. Flowers yellow, in small tight clusters. Seeds fuzzy. DISTRIBUTION Endemic, eastern and south-eastern South Island from Banks Peninsula to Southland. HABITAT coastal to lower montane (0-300 m a.s.l.) usually in grey scrub, on forest margins or shrublands. Sometimes on the margins of estuarine or saltmarsh vegetation in places which would be subject to saline water in extremes of tide, also found on gravelly soils often on the margins of steep gullies, gorges and in boulder field. FEATURES Small semi-deciduous tree up to 8 m tall. Trunk stout, up to 0.6 m d.b.h., clad in greyish-brown bark, this long persistent peeling in long flaking strips. Branches dark reddish brown ascending to spreading; branchlets reddish- brown to red, rigidly wiry, flexuous (often zig-zagging), interlacing, striate. Petioles up to 3 mm long, red-brown. Leaves alternate, 7.5-40 x 5-15 mm, yellow-green to bright green, elliptic-oblong, elliptic-ovate or broad-ovate to obovate, apex obtuse to acute, base cuneate to attentuate; lamina membranous, upper surface glabrate to galbrous when mature, undersides clad in soft, white tomentum, margins flat, entire.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control ASSESSING HOST RANGES FOR PARASITOIDS AND PREDATORS USED FOR CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE R. G. Van Driesche and R. Reardon, Editors Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2004-03 Department of Service September 2004 Agriculture __________________________________ ASSESSING HOST RANGES OF PARASITOIDS AND PREDATORS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION PREDICTING HOST RANGES OF PARASITOIDS AND PREDACIOUS INSECTS—WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? R. G. Van Driesche Department of Plant, Soil and Insect Science: Division of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA [email protected] GOALS FOR HOST RANGE TESTING Estimating the likely nontarget impacts of agents released to suppress invasive plants has been legally required, to one degree or another, for many decades. Similar predictions were not formally required for introductions of parasitoids or predators of pest arthropods. That is now beginning to change. This book has as its goal an exploration of how such estimates can best be made. This requires overcoming a series of problems, some logistical, some technical, some tied to an unclear theoretical framework for the activity. In this book, the editors and authors have tried to address many of these needs, in some chapters as essays on important tasks that need to be achieved, in other chapters as case history explorations of how the tasks were done in particular cases. This book will not be the final answer, but we hope it might propel the search for such an answer along. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Whether or not predicting the host ranges of parasitoids and predators is legally required varies among countries.
    [Show full text]