The Final Cover-Up Scott Camil Last Week When Richard Nixon Finally

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Final Cover-Up Scott Camil Last Week When Richard Nixon Finally The Final Cover-Up Scott Camil Last week when Richard Nixon finally died, my 14-year old daughter Laurel who is an International Baccalaureate student at Eastside High School here in Gainesville asked me, "Why is Nixon being honored?" She wanted to know what kind of message society was sending to the youth of America by paying so much tribute and honor to a person who was so totally without honor. In seeking to come up with a good answer for her, I read all of the articles I could in the days following Nixon's death to see if I could figure out this total distortion of history which could honor the most dishonorable President we have ever had. So let's take a look at the record. Nixon's 1946 "political career began as it ended, with deliberate duplicity designed for one purpose: to win."(sk/v 557) "He once confided to a friend, 'If you can't lie you'll never go anywhere'".(sk/v 557) In his first political race, he won by smearing his opponent, Congressman Jerry Voorhis, as a communist sympathizer. This was done with advertising, speeches and an anonymous telephone campaign where people were called on the phone and told, "This is a friend of yours, I just want you to know that Jerry Voorhis is a communist." (tfan/wc 55) The person would then hang up. As a freshman congressman, Nixon was assigned to the House Un-American Activities Committee. His most infamous success on the committee was the attack on Alger Hiss, a state department official who was convicted of perjury and sent to prison. According to the book A Tissue of Lies - Nixon vs. Hiss (Morton and Levitt), "It is ironic that the tactics Nixon employed to ensure the conviction and imprisonment of Hiss -- lying, news leaks, midnight searches, attacks upon the press, invoking the separation of powers issue, suppression and faking of evidence -- were the same type of activities that toppled him from power a quarter of a century later." Even Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas later concluded that Hiss was "framed". It is also interesting to note that Jack Ruby worked for Nixon during this time. By 1949, Nixon was ready to move up the ladder, the oil interest needed a friendly candidate for Senate in California, and Nixon was their man. He ran against Congresswoman Helen Gahagan Douglas. In California the election law allowed people who were running for office to cross-file, that is, to file as a Democrat and as a Republican. This would allow a person of one party, for example, to win the primary as both a Republican and a Democrat. Nixon sent out campaign literature to all the Democrats seeking their support and insinuating that he was a Democrat. The other side cried foul because Nixon did not identify himself as a Republican. Nixon also viciously attacked Mrs. Douglas as a communist sympathizer and dubbed her a "pink lady", and he won the election. In 1951, Nixon was selected as vice-presidential running mate for Eisenhower. During the campaign, Nixon was accused of receiving money from a secret slush fund amounting to somewhere between $17,000 and $20,000 a year. At this same time, editorials started appearing in pro-Republican newspapers calling for Nixon's replacement based on these claims. In a move to save his butt, Nixon gave a television address known as the "checkers speech" in which he skillfully played on the emotions of the audience and asked them to tell the Republican National Committee whether or not he should resign from the ticket. Eisenhower, who saw the presentation with a group of Republican supporters, decided the speech was great and they let Nixon know that he could stay on the ticket. In 1952, Nixon was involved in a scheme to circumvent the law concerning campaign contributions. Nixon did not get in any trouble because the way that the circumvention was carried out, no law was technically broken. But Nixon did receive funds that he was not entitled to under the regulations. As vice-president, Nixon endorsed Joseph McCarthy's witch hunts, blamed President Truman for the communist victory in China, sponsored a resolution in Congress calling for General McCarthy's reinstatement, called for the bombing of China, lobbied for the use of atomic weapons to help the French in Vietnam, and raised the possibility of sending American troops to Vietnam should the French troops be defeated. As vice-president, one of Nixon's jobs was to campaign for Republicans running for Congress around the country, and in this endeavor he sharpened his skills of labeling opponents of Republicans as communists and questioning their patriotism. In 1967 while campaigning for the presidency, Nixon promised that he had a secret plan for ending the war in Vietnam. During Nixon's campaign, he attacked Lyndon Johnson's method of conducting the war. During this time, a man named Henry Kissinger became an advisor to the Johnson administration. On the eve of the Republican convention in July 1968, Kissinger described Nixon as "the most dangerous of all the men running to have as President." After Nixon won the Republican primary, Kissinger secretly started giving information about the democratic strategy for ending the war to Richard Allen, one of Richard Nixon's foreign policy aides. "A clandestine channel was set up through Nixon's campaign manager John Mitchell and Kissinger guided the Republicans secretly on the Vietnam issue for nearly 2 months -- thus supplying Nixon with the ammunition to blast Humphrey for playing politics with the war." (SK /V 585) At the same time, Nixon supporters met with President Thieu of South Vietnam and tried to convince him to object to President Johnson's intention to halt the bombing of North Vietnam. It was explained to Thieu that he could get a better shake from Nixon than from the Democrats. Of course the purpose of this was really to foil the Democrats and help Nixon win the election. We see here that while Nixon is talking about peace, before he is even elected he is maneuvering behind the scenes to keep the war going. Nixon won the election of 1968 and Kissinger was brought on board as National Security Adviser. In all fairness to Nixon, it is impossible to really determine from this point on who really called the shots in Vietnam because both Nixon and Kissinger were devout liars and manipulators and equally had problems with their own self-esteem and ego. Since Nixon was the president and had the power to make the final decisions, he bears the responsibility for the consequences of those decisions even though he and Kissinger are both partners in the crime. In 1969 there was a peace agreement on the table for ending the war in Vietnam. The peace agreement that was formally signed in Paris on July 27, 1973 was virtually identical to the peace agreement that had been on the table since 1969. What this means is that from 1969 until 1973 absolutely nothing was gained by all the death and destruction that took place. Some of the things that took place between 1969 and 1973 that Richard Nixon was personally responsible for were: the illegal U.S. invasions of Laos and Cambodia resulting in Cambodia alone in the death of two million Cambodians, the death of 20,327 Americans, the wounding of 110,968 Americans, 81,623 South Vietnamese soldiers killed, 273,130 South Vietnamese soldiers wounded, 412, 996 North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong killed, 619, 494 North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong wounded, over 2400 third nation allies killed, and over 5200 third nation allies wounded. These figures do not include the dead or wounded in Laos . Also not included in these figures are the North Vietnamese killed and wounded by our bombing. During this same period of time, over 165,000 South Vietnamese civilians were killed, over 410,000 South Vietnamese civilians were wounded, 2 million South Vietnamese civilians were made refugees, 2 million Cambodian civilians were made refugees, and 194,000 Laotian civilians were made homeless. Also during this period, over 400 Americans became POWs or MIAs. Of the South Vietnamese civilians who were killed during this time, about 40,000 of them were executed without trial under the Phoenix program. The Phoenix program, if you remember, was a CIA-directed project to eliminate suspected enemy civilians. Nixon is also responsible for the Christmas bombings of 1972, in which for 11 days American aircraft flew 3000 sorties dropping 40,000 tons of bombs on Hanoi and Haiphong. That is the equivalent of five atomic bombs the size of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima (TTT/M page 310). The New York Times editorial referred to this as "stone age barbarism" and stated that "civilized man will be horrified." "Beyond all reason" said The L.A. Times. The Washington Post called this "savage and senseless". What the foreign press said of the bombings was "nothing is more grotesque" -- Japan, "genocide"- Buenos Aires, "a crime against humanity" -- West Germany, "not the conduct of a man who wants peace very badly" -- the Times of London. Also during this time, the Bach Mai Hospital in Hanoi was bombed, and under Nixon's watch the massacres at Mylai took place. Under the rules established at Nuremberg, the senior person in command of the troops is responsible for whatever the troops do. Under this principle, German and Japanese high officials were executed for actions that they were not at. Nixon was the senior in command during the Mylai massacre.
Recommended publications
  • Malooly, Coury- Honors Project
    WE GAVE THIS COUNTRY OUR ALL, AND WE RECEIVED LIES, BETRAYAL, AND NEGLECT! VIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR IN THE ANTI-VIETNAM WAR MOVEMENT by Coury Malooly Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors in the Department of History Texas Christian University Fort Worth, Texas May 4, 2020 1 WE GAVE THIS COUNTRY OUR ALL, AND WE RECEIVED LIES, BETRAYAL, AND NEGLECT! VIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR IN THE ANTI-VIETNAM WAR MOVEMENT Project Approved: Supervising Professor: Kara Vuic, PhD, Department of History Peter Worthing, PhD, Department of History Brad Lucas, PhD, Department of English 2 ABSTRACT The Vietnam War is arguably the most controversial war in American history. The motives, rationale, and methods used to fight the war stir great controversy within the U.S. public. To some, the United States would have won the Vietnam War if it had not “been fighting with one hand behind its back” due to the anti-war movement, but to others, the United States could never achieve victory in the Vietnam War because of the determination of the North Vietnamese state and the Viet Cong. This debate sparked hostility against Vietnam veterans in America during the war as well. American popular culture and myth commonly portray Vietnam veterans as brash, impulsive, and sometimes even violent people received with hostility by the leftist anti-war protestors like the hippies and draft card burners. However, veterans who fought in the war made up one significant part of the anti-war movement, many of whom enlisted. Though the common view is that the military is largely conservative, Vietnam veterans received hostility from conservatives as well because they were considered ineffective fighters and losers in some cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Found, Featured, Then Forgotten: U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War © 2011 by Mark D
    Found, Featured, then Forgotten Image created by Jack Miller. Courtesy of Vietnam Veterans Against the War. Found, Featured, then Forgotten U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War Mark D. Harmon Newfound Press THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE LIBRARIES, KNOXVILLE Found, Featured, then Forgotten: U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War © 2011 by Mark D. Harmon Digital version at www.newfoundpress.utk.edu/pubs/harmon Newfound Press is a digital imprint of the University of Tennessee Libraries. Its publications are available for non-commercial and educational uses, such as research, teaching and private study. The author has licensed the work under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/. For all other uses, contact: Newfound Press University of Tennessee Libraries 1015 Volunteer Boulevard Knoxville, TN 37996-1000 www.newfoundpress.utk.edu ISBN-13: 978-0-9797292-8-7 ISBN-10: 0-9797292-8-9 Harmon, Mark D., (Mark Desmond), 1957- Found, featured, then forgotten : U.S. network tv news and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War / Mark D. Harmon. Knoxville, Tenn. : Newfound Press, University of Tennessee Libraries, c2011. 191 p. : digital, PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. [159]-191). 1. Vietnam Veterans Against the War—Press coverage—United States. 2. Vietnam War, 1961-1975—Protest movements—United States—Press coverage. 3. Television broadcasting of news—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. HE8700.76.V54 H37 2011 Book design by Jayne White Rogers Cover design by Meagan Louise Maxwell Contents Preface .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sign on Letter
    Sign-on letter organized by the Climate Crisis and Militarism Working Group, Veterans For Peace Dear Honorable John Kerry: On behalf of Veterans For Peace and other peace and climate champions, we congratulate you on your appointment as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, thank you for returning us to the Paris Agreement, and applaud your efforts to lead the Biden administration’s clean energy revolution. Let us put militarism at the center of this conversation on climate. We are pleased that the Biden/Harris Administration has created this position, as a reflection of the seriousness of the climate crisis, and we are pleased that the person with that position is you. It is approaching 50 years since you, as an anti-war veteran, delivered to Congress a lengthy, articulate and devastating critique of the Viet Nam war. Some of us were already anti-war veterans or soldiers, and you spoke truth to power for us. You have had many positions of power since that time; in your present position, we ask that you summon the courage and clarity about war and militarism that you expressed to Congress in April 1971. You posed the question, “How do we ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?” Now the question we pose is, “How do we ask millions of people to die as a result of a climate catastrophe fueled by endless war and militarism?” To thwart climate catastrophe, we present the following requests: 1) Please implement the inclusion of military emissions in all reporting and data on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Zinoman & Kulik
    Misrepresenting Atrocities: Kill Anything that Moves and the Continuing Distortions of the War in Vietnam Gary Kulik, former editor of American Quarterly Peter Zinoman, University of California, Berkeley Nick Turse. Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2013. 384 pp. $30.00 (cloth), $17.00 (paper), $10.00 (e-book). Introduction While a new body of serious academic scholarship on the Vietnam War has recently broken free from the polarized battles between “hawks” and “doves” that stunted the development of the field in the 1960s and 1970s, much mainstream historical writing on the conflict continues to be consumed by a strangely dated and zero-sum form of political combat.1 Historians of the war who continue to work in this deeply politicized vein ignore many of the most critical theoretical and methodological developments in the historical study of warfare, as well as new studies of Vietnamese history that challenge old interpretations of the conflict. The academic establishment and the reading public must bear some responsibility for the survival of this mode of scholarship, since research addressing old topics in familiar ways continues to find a large audience. The enduring popularity of politicized approaches to the Vietnam War in the United States is perfectly illustrated by the commercial success and critical praise garnered by Nick Turse’s new book, Kill Anything that Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam (KATM), a New York Times best seller that has been reviewed widely and warmly in the press and discussed at length on radio and television.
    [Show full text]
  • Production/Press Information
    13 Upper Baggott Street, Dublin 4, Eire. Tel:+353 1 6776681 Fax:+353 1 6709764 E: [email protected] Web: www.stoneyroadfilms.com Production/Press Pack WINTER SOLDIER Year of Production: 1972. Length: 95 minutes. Original Format: 16mm Black & White and Color. Re-released in DigiBeta. Location: Shot on location in Detroit, Michigan. Produced and directed by: Winterfilm Collective in association with Vietnam Veterans Against the War. Distributor: Stoney Road Films Contact: Simon Hudson 13 Upper Baggott Street Gareth Lennon Dublin 4 Eire UK Theatrical Release: May 8th 2008 ICA, The Mall, London. Winterfilm Collective Frederick Aronow, Nancy Baker, Joe Bangert, Rhetta Barron, Robert Fiore, David Gillis, David Grubin, Jeff Holstein, Barbara Jarvis, Al Kaupas, Barbara Kopple, Mark Lenix, Michael Lesser, Nancy Miller Saunders, Lee Osborne, Lucy Massie Phenix, Roger Phenix, Benay Rubenstein, Michael Weil. Stoney Road Films 13 Upper Baggott Street, Dublin 4, Eire. t: + 353 1 6776681 f: 353 1 6709764 e: [email protected] Winter Soldiers in the Film (in order of appearance) Rusty Sachs, 1st Marine Air Wing Joseph Bangert, 1st Marine Air Wing Scott Shimabukuro, 3rd Marine Division Kenneth Campbell, 1st Marine Division Scott Camil, 1st Marine Division John Kerry, Costal Divisions 11 & 13, USN Steve Pitkin, 9th Infantry Division Johnathan Birch, 3rd Marine Division Charles Stevens 101st Airborne Division Fred Nienke, 1st Marine Division David Bishop, 1st Marine Division Nathan Hale, Americal Division Michael Hunter, 1st Infantry Division
    [Show full text]
  • Inmedia, 4 | 2013 “How Could You Forget That?”: Representing Collective and Traumatic Memories
    InMedia The French Journal of Media Studies 4 | 2013 Exploring War Memories in American Documentaries “How Could You Forget That?”: Representing Collective and Traumatic Memories in Winter Soldier Daniel Grinberg Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/inmedia/674 DOI: 10.4000/inmedia.674 ISSN: 2259-4728 Publisher Center for Research on the English-Speaking World (CREW) Electronic reference Daniel Grinberg, « “How Could You Forget That?”: Representing Collective and Traumatic Memories in Winter Soldier », InMedia [Online], 4 | 2013, Online since 18 November 2013, connection on 08 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/inmedia/674 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/ inmedia.674 This text was automatically generated on 8 September 2020. © InMedia “How Could You Forget That?”: Representing Collective and Traumatic Memories ... 1 “How Could You Forget That?”: Representing Collective and Traumatic Memories in Winter Soldier Daniel Grinberg AUTHOR'S NOTE The author would like to thank Brett Bowles, Edward Bowen, Derek Horn, and the anonymous peer-reviewers for reading earlier drafts of this article and providing their valuable feedback. 1 “If one dude got up and rapped all this shit, they’d hang him,” Scott Shimabukuro tells his fellow veterans in the 1972 documentary Winter Soldier.1 “But they can’t deny the testimony of all these dudes in the room.” Hoping to “remove the blinders and the blinds from in front of America’s eyes,”2 116 veterans and 16 civilians gathered at Howard Johnson’s New Center Motor Lodge in Detroit, Michigan on January 31 and February 1 and 2, 1971 to speak at the Vietnam Veterans Against The War’s (VVAW) Winter Soldier Investigation hearings.3 Over those three days, the majority of these 132 individuals4 publicly testified to atrocities they participated in or witnessed in Vietnam from 1963 to 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • Scott Camil Interviewer: Stuart Landers Date: October 20, 1992
    AL 153 Interviewee: Scott Camil Interviewer: Stuart Landers Date: October 20, 1992 L: This is an oral history interview with Scott Camil being conducted at his house in the southern part of Alachua County. Today is October 20, 1992, and my name is Stuart Landers. Tell me your full name. C: Scott Camil. L: Is there a middle name? C: No. L: Where were you born? C: I was born in Brooklyn, New York, May 19, 1946. I will also say that May 19 is also the birthday of Ho Chi Minh [1890-1969; Vietnamese Communist leader], Malcolm X [1925-1965; American civil rights activist], Augusto Sandino [1893- 1934; Nicaraguan guerrilla leader], and Kemal Ataturk [1880-1938; first president of Turkish Republic, 1923-1938]. I was actually born with the name Scott Abramson, but my mother remarried when I was four, so Scott Camil was always my name. I never changed it back to my original name because my name is who people know me by. L: Do you know anything about Abramson, your biological father? C: Yes. He lives here in Gainesville. He works for the state in the health department. He is a veteran of World War II. He has also done time in prison for marijuana. L: What is his first name? C: Sanford. L: You are Jewish, correct? C: Yes. I was raised Jewish, and I was bar mitzvahed. I had to go to Hebrew school because the family made me, but they said that after I was bar mitzvahed I would not have to go anymore.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to Climate Envoy Kerry
    April 27, 2021 NATIONAL BOARD OF Dear Honorable John Kerry, DIRECTORS On behalf of Veterans For Peace and other peace and climate champions, we congratulate EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE you on your appointment as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, thank you for returning us Adrienne Kinne - President Natasha Erskine - Vice President to the Paris Agreement, and join you in promoting a transition from fossil fuels to safe, Michael Dempsey - Secretary renewable forms of energy such as solar, wind, geothermal, and small hydropower. Miles Megaciph - Treasurer BOARD MEMBERS Let us put militarism at the center of this conversation on climate. Elliott Adams Paul Cox We are pleased that the Biden/Harris Administration has created this position, as a reflection Marti GuyDowning of the seriousness of the climate crisis, and we are pleased that the person with that position is Willie Hager George Johnson you. It is approaching 50 years since you, as an anti-war veteran, delivered to Congress a Ken Mayers lengthy, articulate and devastating critique of the Viet Nam war. Some of us were already anti- Susan Schnall war veterans or soldiers, and you spoke truth to power for us. You have had many positions of Ben Schrader power since that time; in your present position, we ask that you summon the courage and Joshua Shurley clarity about war and militarism that you expressed to Congress in April 1971. ADVISORY BOARD Edward Asner You posed the question, “How do we ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?” Andrew Bacevich Medea Benjamin Phyllis Bennis Now the question we pose is, “How do we ask millions of people to die as a result of a climate Roy Bourgeois catastrophe fueled by endless war and militarism?” Jackson Browne Paul Chappell To thwart climate catastrophe, we present the following requests: Charlie Clements Marjorie Cohn John Dear 1) Please implement the inclusion of military emissions in all reporting and data on Phil Donahue Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding and Reporting Atrocities During The
    NOT JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS: AVOIDING AND REPORTING ATROCITIES DURING THE VIETNAM WAR by CHRISTOPHER JAMES LEVESQUE ANDREW HUEBNER, COMMITTEE CO-CHAIR DANIEL RICHES, COMMITTEE CO-CHAIR KARI FREDERICKSON JOHN GIGGIE JAMES S. OLSON A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2014 Copyright Christopher James Levesque 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This dissertation develops a history of soldiers’ efforts to report war crimes over the course of the Vietnam War. Previous scholarship that addressed this issue largely dismissed GIs who alleged war crimes as political activists, dupes of the media, or individuals seeking forgiveness for their actions in combat. However, these three categories are insufficient to understand the motives leading troops to claim that they witnessed war crimes during their service in Southeast Asia. Nor do they account for how soldiers chose to make their allegations, or how their rationales or methods changed over time. By re-examining the historical record of GI involvement in the antiwar movement, media accounts of soldiers alleging war crimes, and declassified Department of Defense documents, this dissertation presents a new framework for understanding both how and why American soldiers reported atrocities. Soldiers adopted four primary venues when they alleged war crimes in Vietnam: their chain of command, the federal government, the media, or the antiwar movement. Generally, soldiers who remained convinced that the Army’s hierarchy would properly investigate atrocity allegations reported atrocities through their local chains of command. As soldiers became increasingly disenchanted with the Army and the war, they chose more public venues to report war crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • John Kerry Fbi Files
    PAPERLESS ARCHIVES WWW.PAPERLESSARCHIVES.COM VIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR - JOHN KERRY FBI FILES SAMPLE PAGES TO OBTAIN COMPLETE SET VISIT HTTP://WWW.PAPERLESSARCHIVES.COM PAPERLESS ARCHIVES WWW.PAPERLESSARCHIVES.COM VIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR - JOHN KERRY FBI FILES TO OBTAIN COMPLETE SET VISIT HTTP://WWW.PAPERLESSARCHIVES.COM Vietnam Veterans Against The War FBI Files. 19,978 pages of FBI files covering the activities of the ant-Vietnam War group, Vietnam Veterans Against the War.. Most of this material was originally released in 1999 to author and historian Gerald Nicosia, after seeking their release under the Freedom of Information Act in 1988. This set released in June 2004, contains pages of documents not released to Nicosia in 1999. The documents date from 1967 to 1976. They are composed of memos, reports, investigation summaries, confidential informant accounts, newspaper and wire service articles, and Vietnam Veterans Against the War bulletins and flyers. The files give broad coverage to activities of VVAW members such as Scott Camil, Al Hubbard, Joseph Urgo, Michael Oliver, Edward Damato, Larry Rottman, George Roberts, Craig Scott Moore and the person who has become its most well known member, John Kerry. After six Vietnam Veterans walked together in an anti-Vietnam War march, Vietnam Veterans Against the War was founded in New York City, in 1967. The investigation of the VVAW gained steam after Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara saw an advertisement from the group in the November 11, 1967 edition of the New York Times. In 1970 the group had 600 members. By the 1971 it had 6,000 members.
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Koszulinski [email protected]
    Georg Koszulinski [email protected] EDUCATION & TEACHING Associate Professor, Film Studies, University of North Carolina-Wilmington (2020-) Assistant Professor, Film Studies, University of North Carolina-Wilmington (2017-2020) Assistant Professor, Film Studies, Seattle University (2013-2017) MFA, Film and Video Production, University of Iowa (2011-13) MA, English/Film and Media Studies, University of Florida (2009-11) BA, English/Film and Media Studies, University of Florida, graduated cum laude (2003) BROADCAST, LICENSING, & DISTRIBUTION Juskatla, Alexander Street/ProQuest (2020-present) White Ravens: A Legacy of Resistance, Alexander Street/ProQuest (2020-present) Cracker Crazy: Invisible Histories of the Sunshine State, Alexander Street/ProQuest (2020-present) Immokalee, U.S.A., Alexander Street/ProQuest (2020-present) Last Stop, Flamingo, Alexander Street/ProQuest (2020-present) Continents Quiver as Memories Erupt into Earthflames, CODEC International Experimental Film and Video Festival, Online Streaming (2020-present) White Ravens: a Legacy of Resistance, distributed by Cargo Film & Releasing and licensed to Cinedigm/Docurama, available on Amazon Prime (2019-present) America is Waiting, distributed by Cargo Film & Releasing and licensed to Cinedigm/Docurama, available on Amazon Prime (2019-present) Loa: Encounters with the Sacred Spirits of Haiti, Gravitas Ventures-Streampix, Comcast/Xfinity (2018-20) Mortuary Film, Experiments in Cinema, Vol. 13.6, DVD Collection (2018) America is Waiting, GuideDoc, www.guidedoc.tv (2018-20)
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Protests
    1 Southern Protests: Scott Camil and the Anti-War Movement at the University of Florida, 1969-1975 Michael Steven Thomas 2 Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Anti-war Fervor Reaches Florida 9 III. Scott Camil 23 IV. The May 1972 Crisis 33 Pictures from 1972 42 V. The Gainesville 8 and Assassination Attempt 47 VI. Conclusion 53 VII. Bibliography 56 3 I. Introduction “There is something special about Gainesville. I cannot tell you what it is, but Gainesville is a very unique place. Gainesville is in the national news a lot, and it is not that big of a city compared to cities all over the country… A lot of things happen in Gainesville.” -Scott Camil, 1992 Late one Tuesday night in 1972, a mass of students stood outside their school’s administration building, halting all traffic on one of the busiest roads in the city. Over 1500 students gathered over the course of the day in an attempt to protest the President of the United States’ escalation of the Vietnam War and their school’s indirect support of the war effort. Some yelled obscenities at the police officers in front of them, others played guitar to the chants of the crowd, while another group stood silently in support for their beliefs. After it became apparent to the politicians and police officers of the city that these protestors would not move, officers equipped with riot gear were ordered to break up the assembly. The chaos that followed seemed like a scene out of Birmingham in the 1960s. The protestors were blasted with a fire hose.
    [Show full text]