DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 2018/0329(COD) 28.9.2020 AMENDMENTS 120 - 754 Draft report Tineke Strik (PE648.370v01-00) Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (recast) Proposal for a directive (COM(2018)0634 – C8-0407/2018 – 2018/0329(COD)) AM\1214327EN.docx PE658.738v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegReport PE658.738v01-00 2/351 AM\1214327EN.docx EN Amendment 120 Anne-Sophie Pelletier Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 Draft legislative resolution Amendment 1. Adopts its position at first reading 1. Proposal for a rejection hereinafter set out, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal. Or. en Amendment 121 Anne-Sophie Pelletier Proposal for a directive Title 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Proposal for a Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on common standards and procedures in on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally Member States for returning irregularly staying third-country nationals (recast) staying third-country nationals (recast) A contribution from the European A contribution from the European Commission to the Leaders’ meeting in Commission to the Leaders’ meeting in Salzburg on 19-20 September 2018 Salzburg on 19-20 September 2018 Or. en Justification This is a horizontal amendment, linked to amendments to recitals 6,9, 10,22, 25, 32, 40 and 47 and Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 13, 14, 15 and 22 AM\1214327EN.docx 3/351 PE658.738v01-00 EN Amendment 122 Sylvie Guillaume, Tanja Fajon, Pietro Bartolo, Dietmar Köster, Domènec Ruiz Devesa Proposal for a directive Title 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Proposal for a Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on common standards and procedures in on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally Member States for returning irregularly staying third-country nationals (recast) staying third-country nationals (recast) A contribution from the European A contribution from the European Commission to the Leaders’ meeting in Commission to the Leaders’ meeting in Salzburg on 19-20 September 2018 Salzburg on 19-20 September 2018 Or. en Justification The word "illegal" is not considered as relevant in the context of migration. It will be replaced in the whole text by "irregular". International bodies including the United Nations General Assembly and International Organization for Migration have all recommended to use instead the terms “irregular” or “undocumented”. This is a horizontal amendment linked to articles 1,2,3,4,8,10,13,14,15 and 22. Amendment 123 Laura Ferrara, Sabrina Pignedoli Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) An effective and fair return policy (2) The external borders of the is an essential part of the Union’s approach Member States are the borders of the to better manage migration in all aspects, Union. A joint return policy that is both as reflected in the European Agenda on effective and respectful of the rights of Migration of May 201511. illegally staying migrants is an essential part of the Union’s approach to better manage migration in all aspects, as reflected in the European Agenda on Migration of May 201511. _________________ _________________ PE658.738v01-00 4/351 AM\1214327EN.docx EN 11 11 COM(2015)285. 11 11 COM(2015)285. Or. it Amendment 124 Anne-Sophie Pelletier Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) An effective and fair return policy (2) A dignified, humane, rights-based is an essential part of the Union's policy should be the basis of the Union's approach to better manage migration in all approach to better manage migration in all aspects, as reflected in the European aspects. Agenda on Migration of May 201511 . _________________ 11 COM(2015) 285 final. Or. en Amendment 125 Nadine Morano, Paulo Rangel Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) An effective and fair return policy (2) An effective and fair return policy is an essential part of the Union's approach is an essential part of the Union's approach to better manage migration in all aspects, to better manage migration in all aspects in as reflected in the European Agenda on a more balanced way, as reflected in the Migration of May 201511 . European Agenda on Migration of May 201511. _________________ _________________ 11 11 COM(2015) 285 final. 11 11 COM(2015) 285 final. Or. fr AM\1214327EN.docx 5/351 PE658.738v01-00 EN Amendment 126 Charlie Weimers, Emmanouil Fragkos Proposal for a directive Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) An effective and fair return policy (2) An effective, efficient and swift is an essential part of the Union's approach return policy is an essential part of the to better manage migration in all aspects, Union's approach to better manage as reflected in the European Agenda on migration in all aspects, as reflected in the Migration of May 201511 . European Agenda on Migration of May 201511 . _________________ _________________ 11 COM(2015) 285 final. 11 COM(2015) 285 final. Or. en Amendment 127 Anne-Sophie Pelletier Proposal for a directive Recital 3 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) On 28 June 2018, in its deleted conclusions, the European Council underlined the necessity to significantly step up the effective return of irregular migrants, and welcomed the intention of the Commission to make legislative proposals for a more effective and coherent European return policy. Or. en Amendment 128 Laura Ferrara, Sabrina Pignedoli Proposal for a directive Recital 3 PE658.738v01-00 6/351 AM\1214327EN.docx EN Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) On 28 June 2018, in its (3) The rate of return of migrants in conclusions, the European Council irregular situations in the Union remains underlined the necessity to significantly too low. As stressed by the European step up the effective return of irregular Council on 28 June 2018, in its migrants, and welcomed the intention of conclusions, it is necessary to adopt an the Commission to make legislative effective and coherent European return proposals for a more effective and policy with a view to significantly stepping coherent European return policy. up the effective return of irregular migrants through the improvement of return and readmission procedures, including through the conclusion of new bilateral readmission agreements and by ensuring that existing agreements are fully applied. Or. it Amendment 129 Nadine Morano, Paulo Rangel Proposal for a directive Recital 3 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) On 28 June 2018, in its (3) On 28 June 2018, in its conclusions, the European Council conclusions, the European Council underlined the necessity to significantly underlined the necessity to significantly step up the effective return of irregular step up the effective return of irregular migrants, and welcomed the intention of migrants, and welcomed the intention of the Commission to make legislative the Commission to make legislative proposals for a more effective and coherent proposals for a more effective and coherent European return policy. European return policy. These conclusions were adopted in a context where the effective return rate was only 36.6% in 2017, which is wholly inadequate. Or. fr Amendment 130 Tom Vandendriessche, Nicolas Bay Proposal for a directive Recital 3 AM\1214327EN.docx 7/351 PE658.738v01-00 EN Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 3. On 28 June 2018, in its (3) On 28 June 2018, in its conclusions, the European Council conclusions, the European Council underlined the necessity to significantly underlined the necessity to significantly step up the effective return of irregular step up the effective return of illegal migrants, and welcomed the intention of migrants and failed asylum seekers, and the Commission to make legislative welcomed the intention of the Commission proposals for a more effective and coherent to make legislative proposals for a more European return policy. effective and coherent European return policy. (This amendment applies throughout the entire text.) Or. nl Justification The new term ‘irregular migration’ creates uncertainty surrounding the essential characteristic of illegal immigration, namely that it is immigration that contravenes the law. Amendment 131 Anne-Sophie Pelletier Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3a) On 19 December 2018, the United Nations General Assembly endorsed the UN Global Compact on Migration. States committed in this text to ensure that any detention in the context of international migration follows due process, is non- arbitrary, based on law, necessity, proportionality and individual assessments, is carried out by authorised officials, and for the shortest possible period of time, irrespective whether detention occurs at the moment of entry, in transit, or proceedings of return, and regardless of the type of place where the detention occurs. They also committed to prioritize non-custodial alternatives to detention that are in line with PE658.738v01-00 8/351 AM\1214327EN.docx EN international law, and to take a human rights-based approach to any detention of migrants, using detention as a measure of last resort only. Or. en Justification This amendment is needed as it is inextricably linked to the amendment tabled to recital 4. Amendment 132 Laura Ferrara, Sabrina Pignedoli Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3a) The implementation of joint awareness-raising campaigns in third countries on the risks inherent in irregular migration and on the Union’s return policy should be strengthened.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Lettera Sassoli Chiusura Parlamento IT.Pages
    8 marzo 2020 Caro Presidente Sassoli, Ti scriviamo per esprimere la nostra profonda preoccupazione per la diffusione della malattia infettiva causata dal coronavirus COVID-19 in Europa e per richiedere ulte- riori misure di sicurezza per salvaguardare i Membri del Parlamento europeo, il per- sonale e la popolazione locale. Come ben sai, il livello di emergenza legato alla diffusione di questo virus è note- volmente aumentato nel corso delle ultime ore: il numero di casi confermati si sta moltiplicando in molti Stati membri, compreso il Belgio, e sono state confermate nuove aree di contagio. Misure di sicurezza straordinarie sono state adottate dalle autorità pubbliche di tutta Europa e intere aree sono state messe in quarantena. Il numero di casi confermati è in costante aumento in Belgio e a Bruxelles e questa settimana abbiamo riscontrato i primi casi di nuovi coronavirus nelle istituzioni del- l'UE. Sebbene apprezziamo che siano già state adottate misure straordinarie per far fron- te a questa emergenza, riteniamo che la situazione in rapida evoluzione e i maggiori rischi per la salute richiedano ulteriori misure di sicurezza come l'immediata interru- zione di tutti i lavori parlamentari, compresa la prossima sessione plenaria, come misura precauzionale. Il Parlamento europeo, con oltre 5000 persone che vi lavorano e viaggiano regolar- mente tra la loro città natale e Bruxelles, ha il potenziale per diventare un focolaio di trasmissione del coronavirus. Con la presente ti chiediamo di sospendere tutte le attività parlamentari con effetto immediato, fino a quando i rischi per la salute legati alla diffusione del virus saranno sotto controllo.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 2016/0133(COD) 4.4.2017 AMENDMENTS 535 - 771 Draft report Cecilia Wikström (PE599.751v02-00) Establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast) Proposal for a regulation (COM(2016)0270 – C8-0173/2016 – 2016/0133(COD)) AM\1122581EN.docx PE602.908v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegReport PE602.908v01-00 2/151 AM\1122581EN.docx EN Amendment 535 Elly Schlein, Sylvie Guillaume, Josef Weidenholzer, Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Miltiadis Kyrkos, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Ana Gomes, Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Kati Piri, Miriam Dalli, Péter Niedermüller Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. The criteria for determining the 1. The criteria for determining the Member State responsible shall be applied Member State responsible shall be applied only once, in the order in which they are in the order in which they are set out in set out in this Chapter. Chapter III, IV and VII of this Regulation. Or. en Justification In order to be coherent with the Resolution on the situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration approved by the Parliament in April 2016, and with the Resolution on migration and refugees in Europe approved in September 2015, the shadow rapporteur is proposing a centralised, permanent and automatic mechanism of fair distribution of responsibilities among Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • B-1047 Bruxelles - Tel +32 2 28 45782 F-67070 Strasburgo - Tel +33 3 88 1 75782 [email protected]
    Ursula von der Leyen President of the European Commission B - 1049 Brussels Brussels, 16 May 2020 Dear President, We welcomed your proposals for the tourism compartment, presented on 13 May. The sector has been affected in severe ways by this unexpected crisis, and we need a strong support to help the workers and the families depending by one of the most important economic field in Europe. Nevertheless, we need an additional effort from the Commission in order to prevent any discrimination between Member States. In fact, the “Communication towards a phased and coordinated approach for restoring freedom of movement and lifting internal border controls” (C(2020)3250) states that “Measures to be taken at national level to gradually lift travel restrictions should take into consideration [...] the assessment of approximation of epidemiological situations in the Member States”. That could cause some discrimination, and could also give the possibility to create internal bilateral agreements penalizing some Member States. Of course, we need to keep the health security as priority, and to put in place every measure to control and prevent the spreading of the epidemic, but, at the same time, we need a strong coordination by European Commission to prevent any form of bilateral agreements against the principles of the internal market. Hence, we asks the Commission to block any form of “tourism corridors” between Member States that could affect a fair restoration of the market. Yours sincerely, Mario Furore, Member of European Parliament, Isabella Adinolfi, Member of European Parliament, Tiziana Beghin, Member of European Parliament, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Member of European Parliament, Ignazio Corrao, Member of European Parliament, Chiara Gemma, Member of European Parliament, Laura Ferrara, Member of European Parliament, B-1047 Bruxelles - Tel +32 2 28 45782 F-67070 Strasburgo - Tel +33 3 88 1 75782 [email protected] - www.europarl.europa.eu .
    [Show full text]
  • Tiziana Beghin (EFDD), Isabella Adinolfi (EFDD), Dario Tamburrano (EFDD), Marco Affronte (EFDD), Fabio Massimo Castaldo (EFDD) and Eleonora Evi (EFDD) (2 June 2016)
    (English version) Question for written answer E-004588/16 to the Commission Laura Ferrara (EFDD), Tiziana Beghin (EFDD), Isabella Adinolfi (EFDD), Dario Tamburrano (EFDD), Marco Affronte (EFDD), Fabio Massimo Castaldo (EFDD) and Eleonora Evi (EFDD) (2 June 2016) Subject: Halting the slaughter of dogs and cats in ‘perreras’ Under the law applying in most of Spain's autonomous communities, stray and abandoned dogs and cats in ‘perreras’ (animal shelters) may be destroyed only a few days after they have arrived in the shelters. The Spanish Government views euthanasia of healthy animals that could instead be adopted as a means of solving the problem of stray animals and overcrowding in animal shelters — a view that is at odds with Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, under which animals must be regarded as ‘sentient beings’ and treated as such. While in the shelters, the animals are deprived of care and often also of food and water, and the methods used to kill them are inhumane. With reference to Parliament's resolutions of 4 July 2012 on the establishment of an EU legal framework for the protection of pets and stray animals (2012/2670(RSP)) and 26 November 2015 on a new animal welfare strategy for 2016-2020 (2015/2957(RSP)), can the Commission say whether: — it intends to put an end to this slaughter; — it can put forward a legislative framework that will afford animals, in particular dogs and cats, minimum standards of protection throughout the EU and expressly ban the practice of euthanasia; — the EU intends to take practical steps to protect the lives of dogs, and of pets in general, throughout the Union? Answer given by Mr Andriukaitis on behalf of the Commission (3 August 2016) The matter referred to by the Honourable Members is not governed by EU animal welfare rules, but falls under the sole competence of the Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2016/0280(COD) 5.4.2017 AMENDMENTS 12 - 259 Draft opinion Zdzisław Krasnodębski (PE592.363v01-00) Copyright in the Digital Single Market Proposal for a directive (COM(2016)0593 – C8-0383/2016 – 2016/0280(COD)) AM\1107736EN.docx PE592.364v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegOpinion PE592.364v01-00 2/151 AM\1107736EN.docx EN Amendment 12 Rolandas Paksas Proposal for a directive Recital 3 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) Rapid technological developments (3) Rapid technological developments continue to transform the way works and continue to transform the way works and other subject-matter are created, produced, other subject-matter are created, produced, distributed and exploited. New business distributed and exploited. New business models and new actors continue to emerge. models and new actors continue to emerge. The objectives and the principles laid down The objectives and the principles laid down by the Union copyright framework remain by the Union copyright framework remain sound. However, legal uncertainty remains, sound. However, legal uncertainty remains, for both rightholders and users, as regards for both rightholders and users, as regards certain uses, including cross-border uses, certain uses, including cross-border uses, of works and other subject-matter in the of works and other subject-matter in the digital environment. As set out in the digital environment. As set out in the Communication of the Commission Communication of the Commission entitled ‘Towards a modern, more entitled ‘Towards a modern, more European copyright framework’26 , in some European copyright framework’26 , in some areas it is necessary to adapt and areas it is necessary to adapt and supplement the current Union copyright supplement the current Union copyright framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Party MEP Statement in Support of Fossil Gas Exclusion from the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)
    Cross party MEP statement in support of fossil gas exclusion from the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) To be consistent with the Parliament's climate ambition and to deliver a just transition to climate neutrality, fossil fuels should be fully excluded from EU public funds. This exclusion is especially relevant to the Recovery & Resilience Facility (RRF) which will be voted on in the ECON/BUDG committees in November. We, elected MEPs, call on the EU institutions to adopt an EU budget and recovery package excluding all new fossil fuel investments from EU public funding, including the RRF, the Just Transition and the Cohesion Funds. The EU budget and Next Generation EU will together total over €1.8 trillion in public investment. The investment decisions made within these frameworks will determine not only how and whether the EU meets its climate targets in line with limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C, it will decide whether it recovers sustainably and whether the recovery and transition is just. The European Parliament has demonstrated undeniable ambition with its recent call to raise the emission reduction target from 40% to 60% by 2030 as well as the ENVI committee’s decision to exclude fossil fuels from the €672,5bn heavy EU recovery and resilience facility (RRF). Investing further into European fossil fuel infrastructure is not cost effective and will create stranded assets, condemning regions and EU citizens to yet another, costly and difficult transition within the next 15 years. However, investing in a green recovery will boost the economy and create jobs. Solar and wind are now the cheapest source of new-build electricity generation in many European states.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 17/05/2021 Mr Guy Verhofstadt, Mr Manfred Weber, Ms
    Brussels, 17/05/2021 Mr Guy Verhofstadt, Co-chair of the Executive Board Mr Manfred Weber, Member of the Executive Board, President of the EPP Group Ms Iratxe García Pérez, Member of the Executive Board, President of the S&D Group European Parliament 60 Rue Wiertz Brussels 1047 Belgium Ms Ana Paula Zacarias, Co-chair of the Executive Board, Portuguese Secretary of State for EU Affairs Mr Gasper Dovzan, Member of the Executive Board, Slovenian Secretary of State for EU Affairs Mr Clément Beaune, Member of the Executive Board, French Secretary of State for EU Affairs Council of the European Union 175 Rue de la Loi Brussels 1048 Belgium Ms. Dubravka Šuica, Co-chair of the Executive Board Vice-President of the European Commission for Democracy and Demography Mr. Maroš Šefčovič, Member of the Executive Board, Vice-President of the European Commission for Interinstitutional Relations and Foresight Ms. Věra Jourová, Member of the Executive Board, Vice-President of the European Commission for Values and Transparency European Commission 200 Rue de la Loi Brussels 1040 Belgium Dear Co-chairs and Members of the Executive Board of the Conference on the Future of Europe, The recently launched Conference on the Future of Europe represents a moment of reflection on the part of the Institutions and the citizens that has no parallel in the Union’s decades-long history and, at the end of which, we must have clear guidelines to define what we want to be and how we want to achieve our goals. We, undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are writing to you because we believe that, in such a crucial moment, we cannot fail to include our partners from the Balkan countries so that they can once again feel unequivocally and indissolubly part of the great European family.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject: Urgent Evacuation of Afghan Staff Working for EU Missions and Programmes
    Subject: urgent evacuation of Afghan staff working for EU missions and programmes Brussels, 25 August 2021 Dear President Von der Leyen, Dear HR/VP Borrell, We write you to express our highest possible concern about the progress of the evacuation efforts of Afghan former staff of EU missions and programmes currently still present in Afghanistan. Given the rapid deterioration and unpredictability of the situation in the country, it is of utmost importance that the EU coordinates a rapid and inclusive evacuation of all persons who cooperated with the EU as they are under a direct life-threatening situation after the Taliban takeover. Especially given the potential deadline set by the Taliban for international troops to leave the country by Aug. 31, great uncertainty exists about the situation subsequent this date. Access to Kabul International Airport as well as the overall security situation in the country are likely to even further deteriorate, making evacuation efforts considerably harder, if not impossible. Therefore, the EU should use everything within its merit to evacuate as many persons as possible before this date. However, worrying signals are reaching us about the pace of the EU’s evacuation efforts of Afghan former mission staff. A concrete example is the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL), where many of the former local staff is still present in the country and under Taliban threat. We were informed that a list of 131 persons (former EUPOL staff and their family members) was submitted by the former head of mission already in July, but CSDP administration allegedly is still working on the bureaucratic requirements for the departure of these persons.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2014-2019
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Petitions PETI_PV278-1 MINUTES Meeting of 16 May 2018, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 9.03 on Wednesday, 16 May 2018, with Cecilia Wikström (Chair) presiding. from 9:00 to 10:30 (in camera) 1. Coordinators' meeting The meeting adjourned at 10.04 * * * The meeting resumed at 10:30 with Cecilia Wikström (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of draft agenda (1) The draft agenda was adopted. 3. Approval of minutes of the meeting of: None. _________________________ (1) In accordance with the committee’s Guidelines 2016, items in sections B of the draft agenda will not be discussed during the current meeting. However any PETI Member may ask before the end of the meeting for an item in section B to be kept open; it will then be automatically included in the Coordinators’ agenda for a decision on its further treatment at a subsequent Coordinators’meeting. PV\1153195EN.docx PE622.107v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 4. Chair's announcements The Chair announced that the European Ombudsman Ms Emily O’Reilly would come at 11:00 am to present her Annual Report 2017. 5. Any other business None. *** Voting time *** (electronic vote) 6. Opinion on the European citizens’ initiative (2017/0220(COD)) (for AFCO) Rapporteur : WALESA (EPP) (deadline for AM : 1.03.2018 at 15:00) - adoption of a draft opinion The Opinion was adopted with 29 votes in favour, 0 against and 0 abstentions. 7. Oral Question and Resolution on ‘Responding to petitions on tackling precariousness and the abusive use of fixed-term contracts’ - adoption of a draft question and resolution The Oral Question was adopted with 29 votes in favour, 0 against and 0 abstentions.
    [Show full text]
  • European Elections 2019
    EUROPEAN ELECTIONS 2019 Focus on Open legislat ive dossiers EDITION N°4 By FB & ASSOCIATI Rome - MIlan - Bruxelles FB & Associati - 2 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS 2019 - EDITION N°4 IN THIS DOCUMENT - EUROPEAN SCENARIO - ITALIAN SCENARIO - FOCUS: OPEN LEGISLATIVE DOSSIERS - Attachment: Legislative files FB & Associati - 3 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS 2019 - EDITION N°4 THE EUROPEANS CENARIO On April 10, the European Council decided to with 22%, the Conservat ives with 17%, the grant the UnitedK ingdom a further extension Greensw ith 10% and the Liberals with 9%. of the Brexit term until 31 Oct ober 2019. The For the political groups within the European Council accepts the part icipat ion of UK in Parliament, of the European Parliament, the t he European elect ions if, on May 23, the participation of the United Kingdom would country is still an EU Member State. In such result in a reinforcem ent o f t he Euroscept ic case, the UK wouldn ot have ratified the with- component and of t he Progressive alliance drawala greementb y May 22. In case the rat- of European Socialist s and Dem ocrat s ification procedures of the withdrawala gree- (S&D), who should both add over 20 seats ment were completed before this date, the more. On the other hand, about 15 MEPs withdrawal would take place on the first day from the UK shouldj oin the of the next month of ratification. Further- more, in the event that the United Kingdom European Conservatives and Reformists did not ratify the withdrawal agreement by Group (ECR), 8 the Greens and 6 the ALDE May 22 and did not organize the European Liberal Group.
    [Show full text]