Open Secrets Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Secrets Project Open Secrets Project Governments are supposed to defend the law and protect their citizenry. However, the lofty principles authorities proclaim to embrace can be at odds with actual agendas. Many governments secretly resort to illegitimate activities to achieve outcomes that would otherwise be unjustifiable. Invariably, many of these activities are eventually disclosed by whistleblowers or declassification of documents. Such false flag operations occurred in many countries. Nazi arsonists set the fire at the German parliament building in 1933 to justify persecution of their opposition. In 1978, Germany’s government acknowledged its secret service set the bomb it had framed on the Red Army Faction. In 1931 Japan blew up train tracks, blaming China to justify the Manchuria invasion. Britain admittedly bombed ships carrying Jews en route to Palestine from 1946 to 1948 under the guise of “Defenders of Arab Palestine”. British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan conceded that with President Dwight Eisenhower he planned attacks in Syria in 1957 attributed to Syria’s government to effect regime change. Israel admitted it planted bombs at U.S. diplomatic facilities in Egypt in 1954, blaming it on Egyptian Muslim fundamentalists (“Lavon Affair”). According to a top Turkish general, his forces destroyed a Cyprus mosque in the 1970s attributing it to their enemy. High-level American sources recently admitted that the Turkish government carried out the chemical weapons attacks in Syria and blamed them on the Syrian government. Italy’s former head of military counter-intelligence, General Gianadelio Maletti, declared in 2001 that the CIA instigated rightwing terrorism in the 1970s, including a Milan bombing with 16 casualties. "The CIA wanted to create an Italian nationalism capable of halting … a slide to the left and … it made use of rightwing terrorism." These activities were part of “Operation Gladio”, a clandestine NATO Cold War operation. Prince Bandar, the former head of Saudi intelligence recently admitted that his government controls “Chechen” terrorists. Several Gulf state officials, including the United Arab Emirates foreign minister publically conceded in 2017 their extensive financing and arming of Syrian terrorists to overthrow Assad’s government. In the United States, White House officials instructed the FBI to blame the 2011 anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda and also tried to link the anthrax and 9/11 attacks to Iraq to justify regime change. The “Pentagon Papers”, “Family Jewels“, “Iran-Contra Affair”, “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and other illicit activities have emerged. Other notorious code names include: Operations Artichoke, Cointelpro, Condor, Gladio, Mockingbird, Mongose, Northwoods, Paperclip, Phoenix, Stuxnet, Washtub and Zapata. These were variously aimed at manipulating public perception to implement policies by use of force, exercising mind control, overthrowing foreign governments, altering election outcomes, hijacking civilian planes, killing innocent civilians and assassinating leading individuals in the economy, labor and politics of many countries. While such revelations may cause a political upheaval, they rarely result in any accountability of the principle actors or implementation of fundamental policy changes to prevent a re-occurrence. Although these acts often violate national or international laws they seem to also quickly vanish from public discourse as unfortunate “aberrations”. Even when additional related operations are subsequently exposed, the combined evidence of such persistent policies is rarely scrutinized. In some cases, the original official version of events is stoically maintained despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Thus, the Kennedy assassination, a watershed moment in American history was officially attributed to a single actor with a “magic” bullet. Decades later, any alternative scenarios are still being summarily dismissed as “conspiracy theories”. It almost seems that even after disclosure, such illicit actions are permanently shielded by a veil of secrecy. The “Open Secrets Project” selects some of these seminal events to present visual mementos based on originally classified, historic documents. The first works in this series are: “Operation Northwoods”, “JFK, The Second Bullet”, and “Atomic Bombs for the USSR”. Operation Northwoods Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation against the Cuban government developed by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962. The proposal called for the CIA or other U.S. government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets that were to be blamed with phony evidence on the Cuban government to justify a war against Cuba. The plans included the assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington". A 2 February 1962 memorandum entitled "Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba," written by Brig. Gen. William H. Craig was submitted to Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the commander of the related Operation Mongoose project. The proposals were rejected by the Kennedy administration. "Appendix to Enclosure A" and "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" of the Northwoods document published online by the National Security Archive on 6 November 1998 Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba [includes cover memoranda], March 13, 1962, TOP SECRET, 15 pp. JFK, The Second Bullet Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 on October 12, 2017 is a 1964 FBI document about Oren Fenton Potito, a Christian Identity minister. The document relates claims Potito made at a public meeting citing the “Surgeon General’s report” on the assassination; he stated the first bullet entered the President’s throat below the Adam’s apple clearly showing that two persons were involved with the first shot being fired from the bridge across the park way in front of the car. To further substantiate this, Potito said there was a bullet hole in the windshield of the President’s car.” Together with the limousine’s windshield bullet hole evidence this report proves JFK was killed in a crossfire by multiple agents. “Atomic Bombs for the USSR” At the height of World War II, when the US and Soviet Union were close allies, the Pentagon drew up plans to obliterate the Soviet Union. According to a secret document dated September 15, 1945, the Pentagon had envisaged blowing up the Soviet Union with a coordinated nuclear attack directed against major urban areas. All major cities of the Soviet Union were included in the list of 66 “strategic” targets. The tables below categorize each city in terms of area in square miles and the corresponding number of atomic bombs required to annihilate and kill the inhabitants of selected urban areas. Six atomic bombs were to be used to destroy each of the larger cities including Moscow, Leningrad, Tashkent, Kiev, Kharkov and Odessa. The Pentagon estimated that a total of 204 bombs would be required to “Wipe the Soviet Union off the Map”. Were the August 1945 Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks used by the Pentagon to evaluate the viability of a much larger attack on the Soviet Union consisting of more than 204 atomic bombs? The key documents to bomb 66 cities of the Soviet Union were finalized 5-6 weeks after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings (6, 9 August 1945). On September 15, 1945 — just under two weeks after the formal surrender of Japan— General Lauris Norstad sent a copy of the estimate to General Leslie Groves, head of the Manhattan Project and in charge of producing whatever bombs the USAAF might want. The documents confirm the US was involved in the “planning of genocide” against the Soviet Union. Moreover, central to our understanding of the Cold War which started in 1947, Washington’s September 1945 plan to bomb 66 cities into smithereens played a key role in triggering the nuclear arms race. The Soviet Union was threatened and developed its own atomic bomb in 1949. While the Kremlin knew about these plans to “Wipe out” the USSR, the broader public was not informed because the documents were of course classified. Today, neither the 1945 plan to blow up the Soviet Union nor the underlying cause of the nuclear arms race are acknowledged. The Western media has largely focused its attention on the Cold War US-USSR confrontation. The plan to annihilate the Soviet Union dating back to World War II and the infamous Manhattan project are not mentioned. Washington’s Cold War nuclear plans are invariably presented in response to so-called Soviet threats, when in fact it was the U.S. September 1945 plan to wipe out the Soviet which motivated Moscow to develop its nuclear weapons capabilities. Had the US decided not to develop nuclear weapons for use against the Soviet Union, the nuclear arms race would not have taken place. Neither The Soviet Union nor the People’s Republic of China would have developed nuclear capabilities as a means of “Deterrence”. The Soviet Union lost 26 million people during World War II. The USSR developed its own atomic bomb in 1949, in response to 1942 Soviet intelligence reports on the Manhattan Project. How many bombs did the USAAF request of the atomic general, when there were maybe one, maybe two bombs worth of fissile material on hand? At a minimum they wanted 123. Ideally, they would like 466. This is just a little over a month after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This initial 1945 list of 66 cities was updated in the course of the Cold War to include some 1200 cities in the USSR and the Soviet block countries. William Burr, U.S. Cold War Nuclear Attack Target List of 1200 Soviet Bloc Cities “From East Germany to China”. National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 538, December 2015. Plans for a nuclear war devised by the US Army in the 1960s considered decimating the Soviet Union and China by destroying their industrial potential and wiping out the bulk of their populations, newly declassified documents show.
Recommended publications
  • The US War on Cuba: from Economic Embargoes, Biological Warfare to US-Backed Terrorism
    The US War on Cuba: From Economic Embargoes, Biological Warfare to US-Backed Terrorism By Timothy Alexander Guzman Region: Latin America & Caribbean, USA Global Research, August 01, 2021 Theme: History All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version). Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch. *** . Before the rise of Cuba’s Communist party, there was a US-backed fascist government under the leadership ofFulgencio Batista who ruled Cuba with an iron fist. Batista was elected in 1940 serving a 4-year term. Then Batista’s reign of terror effectively began when he decided to run for re-election in 1952, but when his political party found itself practically in last place during the election with Roberto Agramonte of the Orthodox Party who was in the lead followed by Carlos Hevia of the Authentic Party, he decided to lead a military coup and cancel the elections. The current president at the time, President Carlos Prio Socarras went into exile as a result. So what did Washington do? They immediately recognized Batista’s government and gave him financial and military support among other benefits. In the meantime, Batista suspended the 1940 Constitution that he originally supported and then made a radical move by cancelling whatever civil liberties the Cuban people had left. Batista had total control over the Cuban economy that was once on equal grounds with Italy in terms of economic growth. One of Batista’s first moves as a typical dictator in Latin America when he gave his full-support to wealthy landowners who owned basically almost all of the sugar plantations on the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 0714685003.Pdf
    CONTENTS Foreword xi Acknowledgements xiv Acronyms xviii Introduction 1 1 A terrorist attack in Italy 3 2 A scandal shocks Western Europe 15 3 The silence of NATO, CIA and MI6 25 4 The secret war in Great Britain 38 5 The secret war in the United States 51 6 The secret war in Italy 63 7 The secret war in France 84 8 The secret war in Spain 103 9 The secret war in Portugal 114 10 The secret war in Belgium 125 11 The secret war in the Netherlands 148 12 The secret war in Luxemburg 165 ix 13 The secret war in Denmark 168 14 The secret war in Norway 176 15 The secret war in Germany 189 16 The secret war in Greece 212 17 The secret war in Turkey 224 Conclusion 245 Chronology 250 Notes 259 Select bibliography 301 Index 303 x FOREWORD At the height of the Cold War there was effectively a front line in Europe. Winston Churchill once called it the Iron Curtain and said it ran from Szczecin on the Baltic Sea to Trieste on the Adriatic Sea. Both sides deployed military power along this line in the expectation of a major combat. The Western European powers created the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) precisely to fight that expected war but the strength they could marshal remained limited. The Soviet Union, and after the mid-1950s the Soviet Bloc, consistently had greater numbers of troops, tanks, planes, guns, and other equipment. This is not the place to pull apart analyses of the military balance, to dissect issues of quantitative versus qualitative, or rigid versus flexible tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the US Department of State Documents Collection, 2010
    Description of document: Index to the US Department of State Documents Collection, 2010 Requested date: 13-May-2010 Released date: 03-December-2010 Posted date: 09-May-2011 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Officer Office of Information Programs and Services A/GIS/IPS/RL US Department of State Washington, D. C. 20522-8100 Fax: 202-261-8579 Notes: This index lists documents the State Department has released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) The number in the right-most column on the released pages indicates the number of microfiche sheets available for each topic/request The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder, Arrogance of Power, and the Struggle for Social Dominance in the US
    Murder, Arrogance of Power, and the Struggle for Social Dominance in the US The moral cesspool of National Politics Introduction Since leaving a start-up company as a result of the dot-com bust, I have engaged in, among other things, reviewing the literature to try to understand the controversy regarding various, potentially linked, events, including: the murders of John Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy; Iran-Contra; the PROMIS affair; the October surprise; domestic call-boy—corruption rings; the Panama invasion, and the two Iraq wars. Note: Most people who read the following will find it extremely disturbing, since it shakes our confidence in our basic institutions and leaders. However, I believe that the material below is accurate. It represents a distillation of many books and web references which, though written independently by credible researchers, corroborate each other. Although I have footnoted many of the statements, I chose not to be even more comprehensive to make the document shorter and more readable. It is not enough to just document excesses, though. I plan another white paper to deal with correcting those excesses.1 Initially, two key remedies appear to be: Almost complete transparency in government, and declassification of almost everything over, say, 10 years old. Setting up independent review panels of any federal operations that have the capacity to commit, or allow, significant crimes. Decriminalization of drug possession and distribution. Drug money is funding almost all the illicit activities, and maintaining a web of corruption that is so pervasive that the entire government is dysfunctional2. 1 The revelations in this document are less than a few percent of that convincingly presented in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Northwoods: Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba Documents
    Operation Northwoods: Justification for US military intervention in Cuba documents libcom.org/library/operation-northwoods-justification-u-s-military-intervention-cuba Below is the complete text from the Freedom of Information Act- released US government document detailing the Pentagon plan to murder innocent civilians and blame the Cuban government as a pretext to invade Cuba. Code-named Operation Northwoods, US Navy members were also to be killed as part of a "terror campaign" This plan, which President John F. Kennedy refused to implement, had the written approval of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer, and every other member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. This FOIA-released document is archived at The National Security Archive at George Washington University (Washington, D.C.). TOP SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF WASHINGTON 25, D.C. 13 March 1962 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Subject: Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba (TS) 1/15 1. The Joint Chiefs of Staff have considered the attached Memorandum for the Chief of Operations, Cuba Project, which responds to a request of that office for brief but precise description of pretexts which would provide justification for US military intervention in Cuba. 2. The Joint Chiefs of Staff recommend that the proposed memorandum be forwarded as a preliminary submission suitable for planning purposes. It is assumed that there will be similar submissions from other agencies and that these inputs will be used as a basis for developing a time-phased plan. Individual projects can then be considered on a case-by- case basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Hope U.S
    Killing Hope U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II – Part I William Blum Zed Books London Killing Hope was first published outside of North America by Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London NI 9JF, UK in 2003. Second impression, 2004 Printed by Gopsons Papers Limited, Noida, India w w w.zedbooks .demon .co .uk Published in South Africa by Spearhead, a division of New Africa Books, PO Box 23408, Claremont 7735 This is a wholly revised, extended and updated edition of a book originally published under the title The CIA: A Forgotten History (Zed Books, 1986) Copyright © William Blum 2003 The right of William Blum to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Cover design by Andrew Corbett ISBN 1 84277 368 2 hb ISBN 1 84277 369 0 pb Spearhead ISBN 0 86486 560 0 pb 2 Contents PART I Introduction 6 1. China 1945 to 1960s: Was Mao Tse-tung just paranoid? 20 2. Italy 1947-1948: Free elections, Hollywood style 27 3. Greece 1947 to early 1950s: From cradle of democracy to client state 33 4. The Philippines 1940s and 1950s: America's oldest colony 38 5. Korea 1945-1953: Was it all that it appeared to be? 44 6. Albania 1949-1953: The proper English spy 54 7. Eastern Europe 1948-1956: Operation Splinter Factor 56 8. Germany 1950s: Everything from juvenile delinquency to terrorism 60 9. Iran 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings 63 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Culture and Us-Cuban Relations, 1945-2000
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository History ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 9-10-2010 INTIMATE ENEMIES: VISUAL CULTURE AND U.S.-CUBAN RELATIONS, 1945-2000 Blair Woodard Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds Recommended Citation Woodard, Blair. "INTIMATE ENEMIES: VISUAL CULTURE AND U.S.-CUBAN RELATIONS, 1945-2000." (2010). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds/87 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in History ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTIMATE ENEMIES: VISUAL CULTURE AND U.S.-CUBAN RELATIONS, 1945-2000 BY BLAIR DEWITT WOODARD B.A., History, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1992 M.A., Latin American Studies, University of New Mexico, 2001 M.C.R.P., Planning, University of New Mexico, 2001 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy History The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May, 2010 © 2010, Blair D. Woodard iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writing of my dissertation has given me the opportunity to meet and work with a multitude of people to whom I owe a debt of gratitude while completing this journey. First and foremost, I wish to thank the members of my committee Linda Hall, Ferenc Szasz, Jason Scott Smith, and Alyosha Goldstein. All of my committee members have provided me with countless insights, continuous support, and encouragement throughout the writing of this dissertation and my time at the University of New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spectacle of the False-Flag
    The Spectacle of the False-Flag THE SPECTACLE OF THE FALSE-FLAG: PARAPOLITICS FROM JFK TO WATERGATE Eric Wilson THE SPECTACLE OF THE FALSE-FLAG: PARAPOLITICS from JFK to WATERGATE Eric Wilson, Monash University 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is Open Access, which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the author, that you do not use this work for commercial gain in any form whatsoever, and that you in no way, alter, transform, or build upon the work outside of its normal use in academic scholarship without express permission of the author and the publisher of this volume. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. First published in 2015 by Thought | Crimes an imprint of punctumbooks.com ISBN-13: 978-0988234055 ISBN-10: 098823405X and the full book is available for download via our Open Monograph Press website (a Public Knowledge Project) at: www.thoughtcrimespress.org a project of the Critical Criminology Working Group, publishers of the Open Access Journal: Radical Criminology: journal.radicalcriminology.org Contact: Jeff Shantz (Editor), Dept. of Criminology, KPU 12666 72 Ave. Surrey, BC V3W 2M8 [ + design & open format publishing: pj lilley ] I dedicate this book to my Mother, who watched over me as I slept through the spectacle in Dallas on November 22, 1963 and who was there to celebrate my birthday with me during the spectacle at the Watergate Hotel on June 17, 1972 Contents Editor©s Preface ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Exporting Mrs. Consumer: The American Woman in Italian Culture, 1945-1975 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kv6s20v Author Harris, Jessica Lynne Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Exporting Mrs. Consumer: The American Woman in Italian Culture, 1945-1975 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Jessica Lynne Harris 2016 © Copyright by Jessica Lynne Harris 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Exporting Mrs. Consumer: The American Woman in Italian Culture, 1945-1975 by Jessica Lynne Harris Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Brenda Stevenson, Co-chair Professor Geoffre W. Symcox, Co-chair “Exporting Mrs. Consumer: The American Woman in Italian Culture, 1945-1975” examines the development and growth of a mass consumer-based society in Italy after the Second World War. Employing a gendered and transnational approach, the dissertation puts women at the center of the analysis by specifically focusing on American female consumer culture’s influence on Italian women’s lives from 1945-1975. This study, in contrast to existing literature on the topic, provides a more comprehensive understanding of the nature of the models and messages of American female consumer culture in Italy during this period, how they influenced Italian women, and the extent of this culture’s influence. Furthermore, the analysis of the intersection of the modern “American woman” (the white middle-class suburban American ii housewife), consumerism, and Italian female culture and identities provides new insight into the unique cultural relationship between the United States and Italy following the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rift Between America and Old Europe
    THE RIFT BETWEEN AMERICA AND OLD EUROPE This book strives to explain the opening of the great political rift between America and Old Europe in 2002–2003. Following the wave of solidarity with America in 2001, most of America’s European allies enthusiastically joined the war in Afghanistan, but for some of them enthusiasm soon gave way to pacifist reactions to the American switch from the common war on terrorism to regime change in Iraq, to American rejection of international treaties and to hostility to the UN. The evolution of American foreign policy from earlier multilateralism to the neo-conservative unilateralism of the Bush administration thus caused hostility in some of America’s traditional allies, among them France and Germany. French and German public opinion polls, media opinion, and the context of past foreign policy supply the background for this analysis in a year of major parliamentary elections in both countries in 2002. Early in 2003, the European-American estrangement led to an open break as Washington plunged ahead, overriding UN and allied support for weapons inspections in Iraq, to launch a blitzkrieg operation against Saddam Hussein. Ultimately The Rift Between America and Old Europe analyses how this decision, combined with the rejection of Kyoto and other international treaties, all clearly related to the conservative Republican revolution in domestic policies, widened the rift by undermining the role of America as a democratic model. The book ends with a critical assessment of the 2000 presidential election and its significance for America’s leadership abroad. This book will be of interest to advanced undergraduate and postgraduate students in international relations and security studies as well as to journalists and policy-makers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report
    The National Security Archive The George Washington University Phone: 202/994-7000 Gelman Library, Suite 701 Fax: 202/994-7005 2130 H Street, N.W. www. nsarchive.org Washington, D.C. 20037 [email protected] Annual Report for 2011 The following statistics provide a performance index of the Archive’s work in 2011: Freedom of Information and declassification requests filed – 1,626 Freedom of Information and declassification appeals filed – 500 Pages of U.S. government documents released as the result of Archive requests – 63,759 including such newsmaking revelations as Chiquita banana company payoffs to Colombian paramilitary terrorist groups; secret U.S. assistance to the French nuclear weapons program in the 1970s; CIA “friendly fire” on exiles’ planes during the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion; U.S. intelligence failure to anticipate the Indian nuclear test in 1974; and warnings in 2006 that minimal Afghan rebuilding helped the Taliban re-group. Pages of declassified documents delivered to publisher – 36,368 in two reference collections: U.S. Intelligence and China: Collection, Analysis, and Covert Action; and Chile: U.S. Policy toward Democracy, Dictatorship, and Human Rights. Declassified documents delivered to truth commissions and human rights investigators – 200 documents to prosecutors in the El Salvador Jesuit massacre case in Spain; 65 documents to Argentina’s Federal Oral Criminal Tribunal No. 5 of Buenos Aires as evidence in the French nuns case; 4 documents to Argentine Secretary for Human Rights Eduardo Duhalde as evidence for the case of the assassination of Miguel Tobias Padilla; document forgery analysis of Paraguay Archive of Terror documents distributed to legal officers and human rights organizations in Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Spain; 60 documents to Argentina’s Archivo Nacional por la Memoria for the Papel Prensa newspaper factory case; 7 documents to the Guatemalan Centro para la Acción Legal en Derechos Humanos (CALDH) for the Luz Leticia Hernandez case.
    [Show full text]