DOCSLIB.ORG

99921 FSPLT3 2440025.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
99921 FSPLT3 2440025.Pdf Fire and Fuels Specialist Report-Shirley Fire Salvage 2015 Cover photo: Burned area of Shirley Fire taken near the point of origin, showing typical conditions in project area. Compare with the photo series in Appendix A which was used in analyzing the Shirley Fire project area Contents FIRE AND FUELS SPECIALIST REPORT .............................................................................................................. 1 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Affected Environment ............................................................................................................ 1 Fire Environment .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Wildland Urban Intermix .......................................................................................................................... 1 Fire Suppression ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Fire Severity and Fuel Bed Change ........................................................................................................... 2 Fire Weather, Drought, and Topography .................................................................................................. 3 Fire History ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Fuels .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Fuel Models ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Potential Fire Behavior ............................................................................................................................. 5 Flame Lengths ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Indicators ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Indicator 1: Fuel Loading ........................................................................................................................... 5 Indicator 2: Flame Length ......................................................................................................................... 5 Assumptions ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................................................... 6 Effects of no action ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Direct Effects ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Indirect Effects .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Results ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Cumulative Effects .................................................................................................................................. 10 Proposed Action)........................................................................................................................................ 11 Direct and Indirect Effects ...................................................................................................................... 11 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Cumulative Effects .................................................................................................................................. 14 Fuels Treatment only- no Commercial Thinning ........................................................................................ 14 Direct and Indirect Effects....................................................................................................................... 15 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 15 Cumulative Effects .................................................................................................................................. 16 Climate Change and Carbon Emissions ................................................................................................... 17 References ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix A- Photo Series ............................................................................................................................... 22 i Fire and Fuels Specialist Report-Shirley Fire Salvage 2015 ii Fire and Fuels Specialist Report-Shirley Fire Salvage 2015 Summary Treatment of 142 acres within the 2014 Shirley Fire area is proposed for salvage harvest. The small scale (142 acres) proposed for treatment represents only about 5% of the Shirley Fire area within the larger landscape (2,545 acres). The proposed project would move the area toward desired conditions for forest resiliency and lower fire intensity and severity. The project would result in the reduction of the accumulation of hazardous fuels within the threat zone of the wildland urban interface surrounding the community of Alta Sierra. The project will aid firefighters in protection of the community and its infrastructure should a future fire ignite of reburn in the project area. In the event of a future wildfire, treated units are estimated to have a flame length of 1.9 feet while, if untreated, units would have 7.5 foot flame lengths. Treatments would improve wildfire control and suppression.. The project would improve the ability to suppress future wildfire within treated units. Background and Affected Environment The focus of the fire and fuels analysis is to address the effectiveness of the proposed action in meeting the needs for the Shirley Fire Salvage and Forest Restoration Project related to reducing the fuel loading from fire killed or injured trees, reducing fire intensity of future fires, improving effectiveness of fire suppression operations and firefighter, public and employee safety within the project area. Fire Environment The Shirley fire started on June 13, 2014 on the south facing slope of Cooks Peak located in the Green Horn Mountains on the Sequoia National Forest, Kern River Ranger District. The cause of the fire is currently under investigation. The Fire was contained on June 20, 2014 after burning 2,545 acres. Of the 2,545 acres that burned (1126 acres Forest Service, 972 acres BLM, and 447acres Private) a total of 298 acres (11%) burned at a high severity, 1,442 acres (57%) at moderate severity, 682 acres (27%) at low, 123 acres (5%) unburned. This was a suppression fire in steep terrain under extreme fire behavior and winds influenced by topography within the Greenhorn Mountain Range. This analysis and the discussion of the conditions are focused on those areas proposed for treatment. The proposed action covers 142 acres of mixed burned severity for recovery and restoration treatments. 2,403 acres of the fire area (94%) are not proposed for treatment. The conditions modeled in the proposed units are just those 142 acres (6%) proposed for actions. Wildland Urban Intermix The project is within the threat zone of the wildland urban interface surrounding the community of Alta Sierra. Without treatment, the protection of the community and its infrastructure will remain threatened by the potential for high intensity fire reburning or igniting in the project area. Fire Suppression The fire dynamics within the Shirley Fire Salvage and Forest Restoration Project have been altered due to the fire intensity and effects from the Shirley Fire in June 2014. The Shirley fire moved down slope across the landscape in a mosaic of intensities that ranged from full consumption of timber and vegetation to very low or unburned. This range leaves the potential for fire in the landscape at a wide range of potential fire behavior depending on vegetation burn severity, fuel loading changes from dead and dying trees and the regrowth of non-timber vegetation over time. 1 Fire and Fuels Specialist Report-Shirley Fire Salvage 2015 Public comments imply that the area was intentionally back -burned in order to burn trees to permit salvage logging. While backfiring was used, it was done to manage fire with “indirect” attack methods to reduce fire severity, not to burn more trees. This type of indirect approach is routinely used instead of downhill line construction for “direct” attack, especially when fire behavior is extreme, to avoid compromising firefighter safety. Backfires
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digitized by South Carolina State Library VOLUNTEER STRATEGIC ASSISTANCE and FIRE EQUIPMENT PILOT PROGRAM
    Digitized by South Carolina State Library VOLUNTEER STRATEGIC ASSISTANCE AND FIRE EQUIPMENT PILOT PROGRAM SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION DIVISION OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY S. C. STATE LIBRARY AUG 13 2008 STATE DOCUMENTS Certified Public Manager Project Submitted by: Sondra Senn, Manager Public Fire Education and Data Management Submitted: February 6,2008 Digitized by South Carolina State Library VOLUNTEER STRATEGIC ASSISTANCE AND FIRE EQUIPMENT PILOT PROGRAM (V-SAFE) PROBLEM STATEMENT The 2007 Session of the South Carolina General Assembly enacted the Volunteer Strategic Assistance and Fire Equipment Pilot Program Law (H3045), providing $3 million in grants to eligible volunteer and combination fire departments for the purpose of protecting local communities and regional response areas from incidents of fire, hazardous materials, terrorism, and to provide for the safety of volunteer firefighters (See Appendix A). The South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, State Fire Marshal's Office, was charged with administering the grant process to include: I) developing the grant application package; 2) establishing the criteria for the evaluation of grants as outlined in the law; 3) marketing the information to fire departments; 4) developing a tracking mechanism for expenditures awarded; and 5) reporting this information back to the General Assembly at the close ofthe funding period. As identified in the legislation, funding received by fire departments must be used to purchase equipment in the following categories: fire suppression equipment; self-contained breathing apparatus; portable air filling stations; hazardous materials spill leak detection, repair and recovery equipment; protective clothing and equipment; incident command vehicles; special operations vehicles; training; rescue equipment; medical equipment, decontamination equipment; and safety equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Facing Fire Tour Checklist
    EXHIBITION CHECKLIST Curated by Douglas McCulloh Organized by UCR ARTS: California Museum of Photography Noah Berger Kevin Cooley Josh Edelson Samantha Fields Jeff Frost Luther Gerlach Christian Houge Richard Hutter Anna Mayer Stuart Palley Norma I. Quintana Justin Sullivan FACING FIRE—CHECKLIST 1 Noah Berger Carr Fire, 2018 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum 20 x 30 inches Courtesy of the artist and Associated Press Noah Berger Delta Fire, 2018 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum 20 x 30 inches Courtesy of the artist and Associated Press Noah Berger Delta Fire, 2018 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum 24 x 36 inches Courtesy of the artist and Associated Press Noah Berger Ferguson Fire, 2018 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum 24 x 36 inches Courtesy of the artist and Associated Press FACING FIRE—CHECKLIST 2 Noah Berger Ferguson Fire, 2018 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum 24 x 36 inches Courtesy of the artist and Associated Press Noah Berger Holiday Fire, 2018 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum 24 x 36 inches Courtesy of the artist and Associated Press Noah Berger Justin Sullivan shooting low, Camp Fire, 2018 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum 24 x 36 inches Courtesy of the artist and Associated Press Noah Berger Kincade Fire, 2019 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum 20 x 30 inches Courtesy of the artist and Associated Press FACING FIRE—CHECKLIST 3 Noah Berger Kincade Fire, 2019 (printed 2020) Dye sublimation print on aluminum
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Intelligence in Emergency Management 1
    Collective Intelligence in Emergency Management 1 Running head: COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: SOCIAL MEDIA’S ROLE IN THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER Collective Intelligence in Emergency Management: Social Media's Emerging Role in the Emergency Operations Center Eric D. Nickel Novato Fire District Novato, California Collective Intelligence in Emergency Management 2 CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I hereby certify that this paper constitutes my own product, that where the language of others is set forth, quotation marks so indicate, and that appropriate credit is given where I have used the language, ideas, expressions, or writings of another. Signed: __________________________________ Collective Intelligence in Emergency Management 3 ABSTRACT The problem was that the Novato Fire District did not utilize social media technology to gather or share intelligence during Emergency Operations Center activations. The purpose of this applied research project was to recommend a social media usage program for the Novato Fire District’s Emergency Operations Center. Descriptive methodology, literature review, two personal communications and a statistical sampling of fire agencies utilizing facebook supported the research questions. The research questions included what were collective intelligence and social media; how was social media used by individuals and organizations during events and disasters; how many fire agencies maintained a facebook page and used them to distribute emergency information; and which emergency management social media programs should be recommended for the Novato Fire District’s Emergency Operations Center. The procedures included two data collection experiments, one a statistical sampling of United States fire agencies using facebook, to support the literature review and research questions. This research is one of the first Executive Fire Officer Applied Research Projects that addressed this emerging subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoia National Forest Assessment Begins with This INTRODUCTION to Provide Background on the Process and to Describe the Assessment Area
    CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Purpose of the Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 6 Structure of the Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 6 Living Assessment ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Maps of the Assessment Area ............................................................................................................................. 8 Assessment Area, History and Distinctive Features ...................................................................................... 10 RESOURCES MANAGED AND EXISTING PLAN OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 12 BEST AVAILABLE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 16 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Chapter 1: Ecological Integrity .......................................................................................................................... 18 Important Information
    [Show full text]
  • René Voss – Attorney at Law 15 Alderney Road San Anselmo, CA 94960 Tel: 415-446-9027 [email protected] ______
    René Voss – Attorney at Law 15 Alderney Road San Anselmo, CA 94960 Tel: 415-446-9027 [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Sent to: October 16, 2015 [email protected] Alfred W. Watson, District Ranger cc: Ara Marderosian Steve Anderson, Project Planner Dr. Michael Connor Kern River Ranger District Alison Sheehey PO Box 9 Joe Fontaine Kernville, CA 93238 Kevin Elliott Subject: Summit Project EIS Scoping Comments for Sequoia ForestKeeper, the Kern- Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club, and Western Watersheds Project Sequoia ForestKeeper, the Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra Club, and Western Watersheds Project thank you for the opportunity to comment. Background The Forest Service is planning the Summit Project within a 10,600 acre analysis area, located around and north of the community of Alta Sierra in the Greenhorn Mountains in the Kern River Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest. The purpose of the project is “to provide defensible space around the community of Alta Sierra and nearby structures, improve forest health and provide for ecological restoration.” The Forest Service proposes to reduce fuels on 2,500 acres, or about 25% of the analysis area, through hand- and mechanical thinning so it can eventually re-introduce fire into the area. And while the Forest Service asserts that fuels reduction, ecological restoration and movement toward the desired conditions identified in the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment are the driving influences that will dictate the end result, it proposes to sell timber “as a tool to improve efficiency and reduce overall costs to achieve its fuel reduction and restoration goals.” The proposed thinning treatments may include commercial timber harvest within the 2,500 acre proposed treatment areas, which the Forest Service expects will produce roughly 5,000 CCF of timber sale volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Committee on Agriculture House Of
    HEARING TO REVIEW THE 2015 FIRE SEASON AND LONG-TERM TRENDS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CONSERVATION AND FORESTRY OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 8, 2015 Serial No. 114–30 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Agriculture agriculture.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 97–183 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:05 Feb 16, 2016 Jkt 041481 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\DOCS\114-30\97183.TXT BRIAN COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas, Chairman RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas, COLLIN C. PETERSON, Minnesota, Ranking Vice Chairman Minority Member BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia DAVID SCOTT, Georgia FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma JIM COSTA, California STEVE KING, Iowa TIMOTHY J. WALZ, Minnesota MIKE ROGERS, Alabama MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio GLENN THOMPSON, Pennsylvania JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts BOB GIBBS, Ohio SUZAN K. DELBENE, Washington AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia FILEMON VELA, Texas ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, New Mexico SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee ANN M. KUSTER, New Hampshire CHRISTOPHER P. GIBSON, New York RICHARD M. NOLAN, Minnesota VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri CHERI BUSTOS, Illinois DAN BENISHEK, Michigan SEAN PATRICK MALONEY, New York JEFF DENHAM, California ANN KIRKPATRICK, Arizona DOUG LAMALFA, California PETE AGUILAR, California RODNEY DAVIS, Illinois STACEY E. PLASKETT, Virgin Islands TED S. YOHO, Florida ALMA S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Response Times, the Boston Globe
    Data notes: These 20,000 fire departments reported building fires to the National Fire Incident Reporting System. The NFIRS system is voluntary in most states, and many fire departments do not participate -- for example, few California departments are listed here. On-time rates (percentage of fires getting a response within 6 minutes) were calculated by The Boston Globe. Only when a department reported at least 20 files was a rate calculated; you might choose a higher threshold. Individual fire departments can be listed here more than once, because they reported fires under more than one ID number. Information on the Boston Globe's investigation of fire response times is at www.Boston.com/fires, including an Excel version of this file. For a more complete spreadsheet with information on fires in each time period, send an e-mail to Bill Dedman, [email protected], with the word "fires" in the subject line. On-time rate, building fires No. of fires No. of fires Total building receiving a response with on-time with slower fires studied in 6 minutes, responses, response, by the Globe, State Fire department 1986-2002 1986-2002 1986-2002 1986-2002 AK Adak Volunteer Fire Department N/A 0 1 1 AK Akhiok Volunteer Fire Department N/A 1 0 1 AK Akutan Volunteer Fire Department N/A 2 1 3 AK Alakanuk Volunteer Fire Department N/A 1 0 1 AK Aleknagih Volunteer Fire Department N/A 0 1 1 AK Ambulance Volunteer Fire Department 31.5% 34 74 108 AK Anchor Point Volunteer Fire Department 11.4% 4 31 35 AK Anchorage Fire Department 86.3% 3,511 557 4,068 AK Anchorage
    [Show full text]
  • 16 October 2013 Kevin Elliot Forest Supervisor Sequoia National Forest
    CENTER for BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 16 October 2013 Kevin Elliot Forest Supervisor Sequoia National Forest 900 West Grand Avenue Porterville, CA 93257 Sent via email: [email protected] Re: Draft Sequoia Forest Assessment Dear Forest Supervisor: The Center for Biological Diversity and the John Muir Project appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft Sequoia National Forest Assessment and offer the following comments. We have also submitted comments regarding the NRVs as they relate to yellow pine and mixed-conifer forest, red fir forest, aspen, and montane chaparral, as well as comments on the draft Science Synthesis and the draft Bioregional Assessment, and we attach some of those here as well for reference. We organize our comments as follows: Section 1 covers general issues, and Section 2 includes responses to specific statements in the Draft Assessment. Section 1 There should be a much more robust acknowledgement and discussion of the existing fire deficit (see, e.g. , Stephens et al 2007, Miller et al 2012, Odion and Hanson 2013), including the existing deficit of high-severity fire (see, e.g., Miller et al 2012, Hanson and Odion 2013, Odion and Hanson 2013). The fire deficit in the Sierra management region should be the foundation and basis for planning for more fire on the landscape of all severities; the Forest Service should acknowledge that the increased use of managed wildland fire and prescribed fire is ecologically appropriate and beneficial for forests and wildlife and is necessary in order to begin reducing the ongoing deficit in wildland fire. In addition: o Creating more fire on the landscape must include ensuring habitat for wildlife (e.g., black-backed woodpecker) that relies on forest that has burned at moderate/high severity in forest that pre-fire was CWHR 4D or above; o Post-fire landscapes, especially post-moderate/high severity fire landscapes, must be acknowledged as creating high bio-diversity and essential habitat for many species (e.g., Raphael et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Smokejumper Magazine, October 2002 National Smokejumper Association
    Eastern Washington University EWU Digital Commons Smokejumper and Static Line Magazines University Archives & Special Collections 10-1-2002 Smokejumper Magazine, October 2002 National Smokejumper Association John Culbertson Fred Donner Steve Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.ewu.edu/smokejumper_mag Recommended Citation National Smokejumper Association; Culbertson, John; Donner, Fred; and Smith, Steve, "Smokejumper Magazine, October 2002" (2002). Smokejumper and Static Line Magazines. 37. https://dc.ewu.edu/smokejumper_mag/37 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the University Archives & Special Collections at EWU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Smokejumper and Static Line Magazines by an authorized administrator of EWU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The National Smokejumper Quarterly Magazine SmokejumperAssociation October 2002 Inside This Issue: Jimmy ........................................................................................................... 15 Fight Fire or Fish .......................................................................................... 30 Interview with John Maclean ........................................................................ 42 CONTENTS Message from Message from the President ......................... 2 Smokejumping and the American West ........ 3 Two Montana Girls Give a the President Smokejumper a Ride ............................. 7 Featured Life Member Stephen Rhodes ........ 8 the University
    [Show full text]
  • THE VOLUNTEERVOLUNTEER Issue 2
    Volunteer Firefighters’ Association of B.C. THETHE VOLUNTEERVOLUNTEER Issue 2 June 2017 Inside this issue: Grand Forks Photos 2 Executive Director’s 4 Report South V.I Report 4 Special Event 4 Foundation Report 5 Foundation Fund 6 Foundation Members 7 OFC Information 9 Muscular Dystrophy 10 Membership List 12 The Volunteer Firefighter’s Association of BC wish to ex- press our sincere condolences to the Cassidy Family and Insurance Questionnaire 13 Friends as well as the Cache Creek and Ashcroft Fire De- Important Information 16 partment with the sudden and tragic passing of Fire Chief Clayton Cassidy Public Education Award 17 More Important Stuff 17 PRESIDENT’S REPORT Association Information 18 VFA of BC Application 19 We are all saddened to hear of the tragic loss of Cache Creek Fire Chief Clayton Cassidy and we pass on our deepest sympathies to the Cassidy family, the Cache Creek Fire De- partment and the Town of Cache Creek. This unfortunate event serves to remind us all that seemingly simple tasks can have dire consequences for any emergency responder. 2018 The best we can do is be aware of the situations around us and keep ourselves as safe as possible. Rest in Peace Chief Cassidy and thank you for your service. Spring Training Congratulations go out to the Grand Forks Fire Department for a very successful Spring Oliver Training Weekend. Participants were rewarded with some excellent training opportuni- ties, a great dinner and some fine entertainment. The weather also cooperated which TBA always makes things better. We are looking forward to returning to Oliver next Spring and eagerly await what they have in store for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants Management Capabilities and Enhanced Planning Efforts
    CHAPTER 10–ENHANCED PLANNING PROGRAM CHAPTER 10 – GRANTS MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES AND ENHANCED PLANNING EFFORTS CHAPTER CONTENT 10.1 Integration with Other Planning Initiatives 10.1.1 Legislative and Policy Integration 10.1.2 State Agency Integration 10.1.3 Integration with State and Regional Planning Initiatives 10.1.4 Financial Integration 10.1.5 Integration with FEMA Programs 10.2 Commitment to a Comprehensive Mitigation Program 10.3 Effective Use of Available Mitigation Funding 10.4 Overview of FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Programs Administered by Cal OES 10.4.1 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Overview 10.4.2 Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Grant Program Overview 10.4.3 Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Grant Program Overview 10.4.4 Cal OES HMA Program Priorities for HMA Grant Funding 10.5 Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grant Programs: Project Implementation Capability 10.5.1 Cal OES Grant Proposal Process 10.5.1.1 Availability of Mitigation Grant Funding Opportunities 10.5.1.2 Cal OES Grants NOI Eligibility Review Process 10.5.1.3 Cal OES Grants Subapplication Process 10.5.1.4 Technical Assistance and Training 10.5.1.5 Appeals 10.5.2 Cal OES Grant Administration 10.5.2.1 Grant Project Management 10.5.2.2 Monitoring of Project Process 10.5.2.3 Quarterly Progress and Financial Reporting to FEMA 10.5.2.4 Grant Project Completion and Closeout 10.5.3 Programmatic and Financial Monitoring 10.5.4 Way Forward for Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grant Program 10.6 Assessment of Mitigation Actions 10.6.1 State Mitigation Assessment Review Team (SMART) System 10.6.2 Opportunities for Other Mitigation Assessments About Chapter 10 The strength of California’s mitigation program is the diversity of efforts by various agencies throughout the state.
    [Show full text]